The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, September 29, 1949, Image 14
< I
7
r
\
Pag* Six
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29. 194»
T!’e answer is to be found in the formal complaint “they” have filed with the court.
By “they” we mean, of course, the anti-trust lawyers from Washington who are out
to destroy A&P.
They say ... and these are the anti-trust lawyers’ own words... that we “have reg«
ularly undersold competing retailers.”
t
To this charge we plead guilty:
We confess that for the past 90 years we have constantly
stepped up the efficiency of our operations in order to give
our customers more and more good food for their rnc^.ey.
The American people have seen nothing wrong in this. By their ever-increasing patronage for 90 years
they have shown that they like this low-price policy.
# *
Apparently the people still see nothing wrong in this today. All during the past week - since the anti
trust lawyers made their charges — we have been deluged with ph^ne calls and left^s from men and
women in ail walks oi me who want us to know they are op^oeu tcTlms cfaCrt to p^t A&P out of
business.
An enormous number of customers are telling our store managers and clerks that they want to con
tinue to enjoy our low prices for quality foods.
Farmers and other suppliers are asking what they can do to preserve this efficient outlet for their
products.
. «
Our 110,000 employees are asking us to protect their jobs and pensions.
Labor leaders are wiring us their opposition to this threat to labor’s living standards.
If all these people will be hurt, why then do the anti-trust lawyers want to put A&P out of business?
Low Prices Don’t Hurt Anyone
Do You Want Higher Prices?
The anti-trust lawyers say because we are able to sell food cKeapet
than other grocers, \ve make it impossible for those grocers to
compete with us.
If this were true, we should Have all the food business in the
United States by this time.
t
Just the opposite is true. In 1933 we Had 1 1.6 per cent of the
nation’s food business.. Now, according to the anti-trust lawyers,;
our share Has decreased to 6.4 per cent in 1948. Anyone can see
we have nothing even approaching a monopoly.
As a matter of fact, there are about 30,000 more individual
grocers in business today than there were ten years ago.
There are about 273 more food chains in business today than;
there were ten years ago.
In other words, we have more competitors in the food field and
do a smaller share of the nation’s food business than before.
Where is this alleged destruction of other grocers? Where is
there any evidence of their inability to compete with us?
As anyone can see, the only purpose that would be served by
putting A&E out of business would be to raise food prices.
JWKo would this Benefit?]
/
SVe were the first merchants to set the pattern for low-cost, low-
profit distribution. Our example and our competition has led other
grocers to keep their prices down..
/
Remove A&P from the picture and food prices are
bound to go up.
Remove A&P from the picture and the way will be
cleared for the destruction of every other efficient
large-scale distributor.
Is this what the American people want?
b this in the public interest?
I
THE GREAT ATLANTIC &
/
\.
I
i -
\
V .
\
/
L
PACIFIC TEA COMPANY
V