The Clinton chronicle. (Clinton, S.C.) 1901-current, January 31, 1946, Image 9

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

Thursdoy, Jonuory 31, 1946, THE CLINTON CHRONICLE Poge Nina NEW BATTERIES Wc hove o good supply of heavy duty batteries. Get yours while they last; TIRE RECAPPING NEW TIRES — USED TIRES MOTOR REPAIRING " NEW MOTORS — REPAIRS — ALL MAKES FOR SALE- 1941 BUICK SPECIAL 4-DOOR SEDAN New Tires. Low Mileage. Motor Perfeet (Within OPA CrUInt) FOR SALE- 1938 DODGE STATION WAGON A Good Buy.'— Can Haul 10 Passengers (Within OPA Celllnil FOR SALE —USED OIL HEATER In Good Condition — Very Reasonable Timmerman Meitor Co. Oldsmobile — Cadillac —• (4MC Trucks Phone 119 y^ales and Service ■ Ipcal hospital Lonnie B. Tinsley, local and Interior decorator, woo mark throush * Eastman Col received 80, and Robert S Mr. Tinsley has been employed at the rorphanage' for the past 18 .... Surviving bert Lyda and .Mrs. till husband, Andy W. Lyda, • 27 last year. Shy Is also Southern Methodist ‘church to de- "Southern Methodism on the March." and ahould be helpful to those who CRAMPS UnNSIHSIOII A Letter to the President of the United States January 18, 1946. Hon. Harry S. Truman .President of the United States The White House Washington, D. C. Dear Mr. President: Your proposal to me in Washington last eve ning that the wage demand. of the United Steelworkers of America-CIO b* settled on.the basis of a wage increase of IS',4 cents an hour, retroactive to January 1, 1946, cannot, I regret to say, be accepted by the United States Steel Corporation for the reasons set forth below. As you must be aware, your proposal is al most equivalent to granting in full the Union’s revised demand of a wage increase of • IS 1 /* cents an hour, which was advanced- by Philip .Murray, the President of the Union, at our collective bargaining conference with th< Union in New York a week ago today. In our opinion, there is no just basis from any point of view for a wage increase to our steel workers of the large size you have proposed, which, if put into effect, is certain to result. in great financial harm not only to this Corporation but also to users of steel in general. As I have tried to make dear to you'and other Government officials during our confer ences in Washington over the past few days, there is a limit in the extent to which the Union wage demands can be met by us. We reached that limit when we raised our offer to the Union last Friday from a wage increase of 12V4 cents an hour to one of 16 cents an hour. This would constitute the highest single in crease ever made by our steel-making .subsidi aries. Our offer of 16 cents was equivalent to meeting 60%-of the Union’s original excessive demand of a 62 a day general wage increase. Our offer met 76% of the Union's- final pro posal Of a wage increase of 19V4 cents an hour. A wage increase of 16 cents an hour, such as we offered, would increase the direct labor costs of our manufacturing subsidiaries by approximately 660,000,000 a year. That is a most substantial sum, and does not take into account the higher costs we shall have to pay for purchased goods and services, when large . wagb* increases generally become effective throughout American industry, as is inevitable after a substantial increase in steel wages.. As you know, collective bargaining negoti ations with the Union broke down at the White House yesterday afternoon, because Mr. Mur ray then refused to budge from his position that a counlry-wide steel strike must take - place, unless steel workers are granted a gen eral wage increase of 19V4''cents an hour. Our offer of a wage increase of 15 cents an hour was again rejected by the Union. The Union threatened to go ahead with its program for a national steel strike at midnight 0 next Sunday, although such a strike will be a clear violation of the no-strike provision con tained in our labor contracts with the Union, which continue by their terms until October 16, 1946. From the outset, we have recognized how injurious a steel strike will be to reconversion and tq the economy of this whole country. Most industries are dependent upon a supply of steel for their continued operations. We have done everything reasonably within our power to avert such a strike. If a strike oc curs, the responsibility rests with the Union. When the Government at the eleventh hour informed us dbout a week ago of its willing ness to sanction an increase in steel ceiling' prices, we at once resumed collective bargain ing negotiations with the Union. Such price action by the Government was a recognition by it of the right of the steel industry s to ’ft* - ceive price relief because of past, heavy in creases in costs, jomething.which the steel in dustry for many months has unsuccessfully sought to establish with OPA. ' . ’• I'should like again to point out some perti nent facts relative to - the wages of'our steel workers... Since January, 1941, the average straight- time hourly pay, without overtime, of our steel workers has increased more than the 88% in crease in the cost of living during that period, recently computed by Government authorities. Steel workers' wages have kept pace with in creased living costs. Such average' straight- time pay in our steel-producing subsidiaries was 8L14 ah hour in each of -the months of September, October and- November 1945, ex cluding any overtime premium and any amount for correction of,possible wage-inequities. An .increase of 16 cents, in accordance with our offer, would raise such average straight-time pay to 61.29 an hour, placing such pay among the highest today in all of American industry. Under oirr offer of a 15 cent increase, the average weekly take-home pay of our steel workers for a forty-hour "week would amount to’ 661.60, assuming that no overtime is in volved. This figure is only 64.'54 less than ther. actual average weekly earnings of these, em ployees, including overtime, in the last full war year of 1944, when the average work week was 46.1 hours. The difference is really less, because we will undoubtedly continue to have overtime in the future, just as we have at the present time. In November, 1946, overtime premiums to our steel workers aggregated more than 61,300,000. Such reduction of 64.54 in weekly take-home pay- is the natural conse quence of a shorter work week of forty hours, and therefore one of lower production. Much as we desire to avoid a steel strike, we cannot overlook the effect both on this Cor poration and on our customers and American business in general, of the 18V4 cent an hour wage increase, which you have proposed. Such a wage increase must result in .higher prices for steel than have previously been proposed would be obliged to pay higher prices for their steel, higher wages to their employees, and still have the prices for their own products sub ject to OPA control. Such a high and unjusti fied wage scale might well spell financial disas ter for many of the smaller steel companies ; and for a large number of steel fabricators and ^processors. The nation needs the output of these companies. Increased wages and increas ed prices which force companies out of busi ness can only result in irreparable damage to the American people. In our judgment, it js distinctly in the public interest to take into account the iiijurious ef fect upon American industry- of an unjustified After a full and careful consideration of your.proposal, we have reached the conclusion Respectfully yours, Benjamin F. Fairless United States Steel Corporation