The Manning times. (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, March 01, 1922, Section One Pages 1 to 8, Page Page Three, Image 3
MO;IN IfO NEW TRIAL'.
Judge Shipp Reserved His Decision
and Takes Matter Uzger, Advise.
-ment.
The following article was taken
'froni Saturday's Sumter Item.
The motion for a new\ trial in the
case of the State vs. J C. Wallace,
who was convicted during the Oc
tober teri of the General Sessions
*Couart of an attempted criminal -ass
sault fn a young girl under four
tdon. years of age and , sentenced
during that term of. court to the
electric chair, 'was heard Friday
atfernoon before Judge S. W. G.
Shipp. The grounds upon which the
motion for new trial rested were
founded upon a sworn affidavit by
Newton B. Cockrill which was taken
before 'A. W. Holman, an attorney in
'Columbia, which was as follows:
"Personally appeared Newton Cock
eril1, who being duly sworn, says:
'That the testimony given against
J. C. Wallace at the October term
of, court of . general sessions for
Sumter county by himself, for at
tempting criminal ravishing was er
roneous and wholly unfounded and
was prompted by persuasion and
n-alice; and deponent further says
:that the complaints made to him by
- 'was about getting a whip
ping anti not about rape; that depon
-ent had been drinking on the night
in question and could not say posi
tively' what happened; that depon
-ent -was shocked at the verdict and
cannot hold this man's blood on
his hands any longer, and makes this
affidavit of his own free will and ac
cord.
"Sworn to before me this 13th day
.of December, A. D., 1921.
(Signed) "N. B. Cockerill."
'A. W. Holman, Notary Public for
'South Carolina.
The following affidavits in sub
stantiation of the motion for new
'trial were also read before the court
by the , defendant's counsel, Harby
.Nash and Harby -and L. D. Jennings.
The following affidavits were sub
'mitted by attorneys for J. C. Wal
lace.
This is to certify that about a
week ago Newton Cockerill made an
affidavit before me concerning his
testimony given for the state in the
case against J. C. Wallace for rape
or attempted rape deponent appear
ed to be perfectly rational and ap
peared to know what he was doing; I
advised him at the time that he would
be liable to prosecution for perjury
for making said affidavit; he signed
it after having been so advised.
:Signed: A. W. Holman, L. S.
Notary Public for South Carolina,
December 21, 1921.
-Personally appeared before me
W. H. Hatchell, who being duly
sworn says: That he has heard
read over the affidavit of Newton
D. Cockerill, signed and dated Feb
ruary 18th, 1922.
That deponent never bought any
r,
A'I
Fair ]
Come in and, let us pros
New Sprir
$15.00, $18.50,
An attractive showing
splendid
$3.00 t
Men's and Boys' Dr
prices you can afford t<
You take no chances
Our' merchandise must
refund your money.
O u l
SUMTE
whiskey for Cockerill as alleged in
said affidttvit, and tIlat while the
said Cockerill was in Columbia, de
ponent never gave hint any wvhis
key, nor did the said Cockerill ask
eponent for any vhiskey, nor was
person, so far as deponent knows.
That the said N. D. Cockerill, at
the time he signed the affidavit be
fore M. A. W. Holman, was sober,
i10 A
We have been asked
subscriptions to The
of March. So any or
us corn for the next 3
scription price of The
FARIV1
[s for your use, and it
without paying out an
:ounty paper to keep
and get a receipt for ;
>ushels of corn meant
s no limit to the amol
TH
'A
Price.
re this statement.
g Suits at
$21.00, $25.00
of Men's odd Trousers,
values at
3 $6.00
ss and Work Shoes at
pay.
when you buy here,
make good, or we will
R, S. C.
knew what he wvas doing, and the
said affidavit vas read over by the
said Cockerill, and he knew what
he was signing.
W. II. Ilatchell,
Sworn to before me this 24th
day of February, 1922.
S. K. Nash, (L. S.)
Notary Public for South Carolina.
Personally appeared before me
I
BUSHI
by a great many farir
Fimes that we have de
e wishing to take adv
0 days and we will al
Times. Remember,
E RS'
is absolutely FREE!
y cash. This being a~
up with the politician
L year or more to besi
a year's subscription,
Lint of corn we will tat
E MANN:
Mrs. Bernice C. Wallace, who being
duly sworn says: That she has
heard read over the affidavit of N.
D. Cockerill, dated February 18th,
1922.
That deponent denies that she
ever bought, or had any whiskey
bought for Cockerill, nor did the
said' Cockerill have any whiskey
when he went to Columbia. That
the said Cockerill was sober when
he left Sumter, and that he had
no whiskey during the trip, nor
was any whiskey bought for him,
to deponent's knowledge while the
said Cockerill was in Columbia.
That the. said Cockerill came to de
ponent during early part of De
cember, 1921, and told deponent
that, he had been to see Mr. Wal
lace, and had talked with Wallace,
and that he had ' told Wallace that
his testimony given t the trial
was false, and that he desired to
correct it, as he did not wish the
blood of an innocent man on his
hands; but that he, Cockerill was
sacred to make an affidavit before
any officer in Sumter, as the matter
would become known, and would
cause him, Cockerill, trouble. That
deponent was going to Columbia to
get board for her daughter, M'.
ache, So that the said Mozelle
could attend school in Columbi.,
and stated to Cockerill that he
could k.o along with deponcnt, ant
that the affidavit could be made in
Columbia, S, C., before some' per
son who did not know about the
case, and who would not nualke the
matter known.
That the said Coeckerill went
with deponent to Columbia, on his
own free will, without any urging
or prompting upon the part of de
ponent, and without any promise of
reward, That deponent has never
promised any reward, nor has she
ever given the said Cockerill any re
ward, nor has she ever offered, or
held out any offer or reward to the
said Cockerill for making any affi
davit, nor has she ever promised the
said Cockerill any money so that he
might leave the country, nor has de
pon'ent ever bought or offered to buy,
or offered to Cockerill any suit of
clothes as alleged in the affidavit of
Cockerill.
That the said Cockerill express
ed deep remorse, and stated to de
ponent time after time, during the
trip to Columbia, that he, Cock
erill had testified falsely at the trial
of Mr. Wallace, and stated that he
wished to do all that he could to
undo the wrong that he had done
to Wallace.
That the said Cockerill was so
)cr, and knew what he was doing
mnd did the same willingly, freely,
oluntarily, and of his own accord.
Chat deponent never begged, or re
juested Cockerill to go to see Wal
ace, as alleged in' his aflidavit, and
lid not know of his having gone to
ec him until he, Cockerill, told de
onent of it.
B. G. Wallace.
Sworn to before me this 24th day
f February, 1922.
S. K. Nash, (L. S.)
Notary Public for South Carolina.
EL FOI
ers to extend the tim
scided to accept corn
antage of og.r co-oper
low them $1.00 per
farmers. the column I
EX CH.
Now is the time to g
olitical year everybo
;. Bring your corn t<
weekly paper in the
Bring as many bush
e.
INC TIM
Pe:sonally apepared before me A.
W. iolnian, who, being duly sworn,
says:
That he is a practicing attorney
of the Richland County Bar, and
has been a practicing attorney for
nearly fourteen years; that on the
13th day of December, 1921 Mrs.
J. C. Wallace, accompanied by W.
H. Hatchell, came to deponent's resi
dence and reuqested deponent to pre
pare an affidavit to be signed by one
Newton B. Cockerill; that deponent
advised them to go to his office and
wait until he caine, and have the
party who was to make the affidavit
there; that said parties, along with
Newton B. Cockerill, were either at
his ofice when he arrived or came
in shortly thereafter; that prior to
writing said affidavit there was con
siderable discussion concerning the
matter, all parties being present;
that either before deponent complet
ed the writing of the aflidavit or be
fore he commenced the aflidavit, de
ponent explained to Cockerill that
such an aflidavit, would lay him liable
to a criminal prosecution for perjury,
and advise dhim to be careful before
he made such an affidavit; that dur
ing said discussion, the matter was
fully explained by deponent to New
ton B. Cockerill, and Cockerill appear
ed perfectly willing and anxious to
make said affidavit, and that there
was nothing to indicate at any time
that any outside pressure was brought
to bear upon the anhi Cockerill by
way of threats, duress or otherwise
tQ compel him to make the said af
fidavit; that he has heard read an
affidavit made subsequently by New
ton B. Cockerill that he was drunk
and in a dazed condition, but that at
said time and place there was nothing
about Cockerill's- appearance, attitude
or mentality to in any wise indicate
to deponent that Cockerill was drunk
Or under the influence of ainy intoxi
cants or anything else, but to the
contrary his conduct was that of a
rational and poised man; that de
ponent advised Cockerill that at the
time he testified against Wallace if
he was under the influence of whiskey
to such an extent that his mind was
deranged and that he did not know
what he was testifying, that he
could make an affidivit to that ef
feet and if such were true he would
not be liable for a prosecution for
perjury, but the said Newton B.
Cockerill did not wish the affidavit
made in that manner; that the said
-Newton B. Cockerill was allowed
every opportunity and consideration
of said aflidavit, and the said affida
vit was not only read over to him be
EAGLE "MKAD"
For Sale at your Dealer
ASK FOR THE YELLOW P1
EAGLE
EAGLE PENCIL CO
t CORET
e for taking corn on
through the month
ative offer can bring
bushel on the sub
1eaded
A NGE
et your county paper
:Jy should take the
> The Times offiee
State. Every two
els as you like, there
ES
Page Three
foie he signed it, but was explained
in detail.
(Signed) A. W. Holman.
Sworn to before me this the 24th
(lay of February, 1922.
(Continued on page four)
Professional Cards
JNO. G. DINKINS
Attorney-at-Law
MANNING, S. C.
DuRANT & ELLERBE
Attorneys-at-Law
MANNING, S. C.
R. O. Purdy S. Oliver O'I3ryan
PURDY & O'BRYAN
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
MANNING. S. C.
l - FRED LESESNII
Attorney.-atLaw
MANNING, S. C.
MONEY TO LOAN
On Real Estate-Small and Large
Loans. Long Terms.
. J. W. WIDEMAN
Attorney-at-Law.
MANNING, S. C.
I. C. CURTIS
Attorney-at-Law g
MANNING, S. C. ,
J. A. Weinberg Taylor II. Stukes
WEINBERG & STUKES
Attorneys-at-Law
MANNING, S. C.
Pencil No.174
Made in five grades
NCIL WITH THE RED BAND
MIKADO
1PANY, NEW YORK