The Manning times. (Manning, Clarendon County, S.C.) 1884-current, June 13, 1894, Image 1
VOL. IX. MANNING, S. C, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13,
THE CAMPAIGN DATES.
AS ARRANGED BY THE DEMOCRAT IC
STATE COMMITTEE.
t
Schedule for the Politieal Fight in South
Caroina-Big Discusion over Weaver
ites and Batkelttes-AII to be Allowed
to vote.
COLUMBIA, S. C., June 8.-The meet- 1
ing of the State Democratic Executive
Committee last night was an inteest
ing and important one. Besides the
fixing of dates for campaign meetings, t
tbe question of allowing the men who
voted for Weaver in 1892 to vote in the
coming c impaign was a live one. It
excited the warmest talk of the eve
ning.
By instruction of the chairman, Sec
retary Tompkins read the roll of mem
bers. The majority of the regular mem
bers who were absent had telegraphed s
and had substitutes in their places. t
The following was the roll as made up: 1
Abbeville-Y. J. Jones. t
Aiken-John Gary Evans.
Anderson-W. A. Neal.
Barnwell-F. M. Mixon, (substitute.) C
Beaufort-Henry D. E!liott. N
Berkeley-T. W. Stanland- t
Charleston-J. M. Kinloch.
Chester-A. E. Cunningham.
Chesterfield-D. T. Redfearn.
Clarendon-S. A. Nettles.
Colleton-M. R. Cooper, (substitute.) s
Darlington-T. E. Early. t
Edgedeld-H. H. Townes. '- t
Fairfield--J. Ui. Kirkland, (substi
tute.)
Florence-R. M. McKeown.
Georgetown
Greenville-J. W. Gray.
Hampton-T. J. Russell.
Horry-J. P. Derham.
Xershaw-T. J. Kirkland.
Lancester-Ira B. Jones.
Laurens-J. L. M. Irby.
Lexingtoni-J. L. Shuler,(substitute.)
MarionJ. D. Montgomery.
Marlboro-W. D. Evans.
Newberry-Dr. Sampson Pope. t
Oconee-J. R. Earle, (substitute.)
Orangeburg-J. H. Claffey, substi- I
tite.) t
Pickens-T. C. Robertson.
Richland-C. A. Douglas
Spartanburg-D. L. Bennett.
Sumter-Frank Mellette.
Union--A. C. Lyles.
Williamsburg-Wm. Cooper. C
York-D. E.Fmley. I
The chairman announced that a
quorum was present and that the com- C
mittee was ready for business.
Chairman Irby thought that the first
business would be the fixing of dates
for the campaign meetings. On mo
tion it was resolved that the ensuing
Democratic State campaign meetings r
be held as follows:
Yorkville, Tuesday, June 19- h
Chester, Wedneaday, June 20th.
Lancaster. Thursday, June 21st.
Camden, Friday, June 22d.
Sumter, Saturday, June 23d.
Chesterfield, Tuesday, June 26th.
Bennettaville, Wednesday, June 27th.
Darlington, Thursday, June 28th.
Florence, Friday, June 29th.
Marion, Tuesday, July 3rd.
Conway, Wednesday, July 4th.
GeorgetownFriday, July 6th- C
Xingstree, Saturday. July 7th.
Manning, Tuesday, July 10th.
Bonneau's, (Berkeley) Wednesday. a
July 11th.
Careston, Thursday, July 12th. t
Walterboro, Friday, July 13th. t
Beaufort, Saturday, July 14th. 0
Hampton, Monday, July 16th. r
Barnwell. Tuesday, July 1'7rh.
Aiken, Wednesday, July 18th-.
Edgefield C. H., Thursday, July 19h-b.
Lexington C. H., Friday, July 20th-.
Winnsboro, Tuesday, July 24th-.
Colmba, edesdJuly 2th.
Oanur, aturday July 26th.
Union, Tuesday, July 31st.
SpatabtigWednesday,August 1st.
Greenvile Thursday, August 2d.
Pinkens C. HFriday, August 3d.
Osonee, Monaay, August 6th- 1
-Andersonl,Tuesday, August 7th.
*Abbeville, Wednesday, August 8th.
. Mr. Kirkland,of Kershaw,introduced
the following resolution i agazd to I
voting at primary elections:
"Besolved, That In the ensuing Dem
ocratic primaries the following pledge
shall be exacted by the managers ot I
each yoter before he casts his vote:
"'I solemnly swear that I am ebtitled r
to vote in this primary election and 1I
. will abide the result of the same.'"
Secretary Tompkins, by request, read
the oath enacted at the last primary. r
It was practically the same as that pro- r
posed by Mr. Kirkland, and the lattet I
withdrew his resolution.
Chairman Irby remarked that therea
was some misunderstanding as to the 1
qualifications of a voter. He then
spoke as follows:
"Gentlemen and the Committee:
"There is one question that is being 1
agitated in South Carolina and hass
been agitated for several months to
which I would call your attention. Soe
far as 1 am concerned, as chairman ofc
the Democratic party, I do not propose
to dodge the question. In its consider- I
ation I shall not undertake to infit
ence or dictate to any member of the
committee, and I repeat it most em-t
phatically, that I will not dictate toa
the committee, but to suggest to you,c
gentlemen, that we marcn right up to
front and take our position upon this1
question. So far as I am concerned, as t
the member of this committee from
Laurens and the chairman of the Exe-]
ctive Committee of the party of this1
State, I shall not hesitate (even should I
it be necessary by a tie vote to give my
opinion by my vote) to express my own
convictions on this question.
"The question I refer to is this, and
1 am unwilling to evade it., for I see a
disposition to dodge it, though Ido not
use the word dodge in its offensive
sense-whether men who participated I
in the primaries of 1892, in the nomina-I
tion of State officers and other candi
dates, who voted in the club and sent
delegates to the State convention which
elected delegates to the national con
vention at Chicago to nominate a Pres
ident-whether these men who are l
known as Third party ites, shall be per
mitted to participate in the general
primary to be held in August next. As
your chairman I feel it to be my dutyj
to say that we should take some posi
tive, decided, outspoken action on this
question. I say, I repeat, that we, as
representatives of the Democratic party:
of South Carolina-and I am glad to1
see that every county is represented<
here-ought not to dodge that impor
tant question. If we believe that thei
men who participated in the primaries
of '92 and who voted for Weaver should
not be permitted to vote- at the ap
proaching primaries we ought to say so.
If we believe that they are Democrats
within the meaning of the Constitu-I
tion and rules- of the Democratic party,
then we ought to say so and permit
them to participate. What I wish to
emphasize is that we should not evade
or dodge this questIon. We ought to
discuss it fully whether it be in public
or In private, but we should declare
whetner or not they can participate
under our rules. If we do not take
such action we lay ourselves open to
the charge that we have dodged the
quaestin and that this committee was
inable to solve it one way or the other. t
thought, gentlemen, that it was my z
luty tosay this much to you on this
ut'ject which is now open to you for
liscussion."
Chairman Irby's remarks brought on s
he hottest discussion of the evening N
Lfld made things lively for a good t
vhile. Immediately afttr the Senator c
iad concludrd Mr. Mellette, of Sumter, x
ifered a verbal resolution that the men
vho voted for Weaver in 1892 be ex- C
luded from voting.
The motion had no sooner been made
han a half dozen memders were on
heir feet ready to offer some kind of t
resolution or to make a speech. Mr.
)erham, of Horry, was recognizsd by I
he chair and offered the following res- <
lution as a substitute to Mr. Mellette's
esolution: t
"Rtsolved, That those white men I
wio voted the Weaver ticket in 1892
hall be allowed to vote in the coming
rimaries."
Dr. Sampson Pope made a strong i
peech in favor of the substitute. He
akl that this committee had allowed
he Haskelites to vote in 1892 and the
aen who voted for Weaver had a right
o be treated in the same manner. The
)emocratic party needed white voters
ond did not want to throw any of them
>ut of the party. (Applause.) The men
vho voted for Weaver were no worse
ban who voted for Haskell. (Ap
plause.)
2r. Kirkland, of Kershaw, offered as
.n amendment to the substitute the
vords: "Upon taking the oath pre
cribed by the party." He said that he
iad no speech to make but thought
hat this provision was wise and pro
oer.
Mr. T. C. Robertson, of Pickens, J
bought that the proposed amendment
vas an insult to the men who had
roted for Weaver. There were good t
ad true white men in his county who
roted for Weaver.
Mr. Townes, of Edgefield, asked the
uestion whether the men who violat
d thir oaths and pledges by voting for
Veaver in 1892 would keep their oaths t
f allowed to vote this year.
Colonel Neal, of Anderson, did not
hink any more should be required of
he men who violated their pledges in t
892 than of the men who did the same
hiog in 1890. t
Col. F. M. Mixson, acting as the rep
'esentative from Barnwell, moved to
ay on the table the amendment of Mr. t
Cirkland.
National Committeeman Donaldson,
if Greenville. thought that the amend
nent should be adoptei so as to pre
rent any misconstruction of the action
if the committee.
Just before Mr. Donaldson's remarks,
Lowever, the motion of Colonel Mixson
o lay on the table the amendment of
Ir. Kirkland was put and carried by a
'ote of 21 to 8, thereby calling out the
emarks from Mr. Donaldson that he t
bought some amendment should be ,
nade to Mr Derham's substitute. t
Senator W. D. Evans said he thought t
very party desired to increase its i
aembership and its stregth. He wished E
hat every man in America was a Demo
rat. He for one would like to ask
very man to come into the party.
Mr. Robertson said that there had
een a good deal of talk about the viol a
ion of pledges, etc. The men of his
ounty who voted for Weaver did not
onsider that-they had violated any t
ledge, unless it was a moral one. The t
reat majority of them had not taken
ny pledge In the primary.
Dr. Pope declared that the oath
broughout the State had been adminis
ered to few voters and that not many
f those who voted for Weaver had a
aken any oath in the primary. 1
Mr. Mellette said that the chairman
.nd the committee had misunderstood
i motion. He meant to exclude onlyt
hose who had taken the oath, partici
ted in the primary and then voted for
Veaver.
Hon. S. A. Nettles of Clarendon, to<
top the discusion and to please the
tifferent minded committeemen, intro
nced the following resolution, which f
ras accepted by Mr. Derham in place
f his own resolution;
"Resolved, That no-white man shall t
excluded from participating in the ]
)emocratiprimaries who shall take the
math required by the Democratic
>arty."
Speaking to tnis resolutien C. A
)ouglass, of Richiand, made the long
st speech of the session, and one of the
ost eloquent. He said he was glad
hat Mr. Nettles had introduced the
esolution. Itt was along the line of
iberality and kindness and would tend
o increase the membership of the party.
le declared, however, that he could not
emain silent after all tne unkind re
narks which had been made about<
)emocrats. He said that the Haskellite 1
nvement may have been inexpedient, 1
d he had condemned it at the time,
it say that Judge Haskell was not aC
)emocrat was to controvert nistory.
Ie asserted that Haskell was a Demo-1
rat and ;had alwrays been one. In the
Leat of political discussion men might]
ay he was not a Democrat, but in the
uiet of the home circle there came a
hange in that feeling and all must re- 1
gnize nim as a Democrat. In 1890.
&r. Douglass said, there had been no
ledge in the primary. The men who
loted for Haskell-had taken no pledgeI
nd had violated no oath and it was
heir right to vote in 1892 without the
anction of the Democrai~ic exe-cutive
ommittee. He said that he would be,
mtrue to himself and to his convictions
f he stood by and did not draw a dis- I
inction between the men who voted1
or Weaver and those who voted for
Easkell. He asserted that there was a
rast difference, and all his words inti
nated that the Weaverites were the
orst of the two.
Mr. Douglass was interrupted by
nembers of the committee who asked
rm what about the HaskelLites who
nad voted for Ensor for Congress and if
askell himself had not voted for En
or. Mr. Duglass said that he did not
mow what Haskell had done, but as
or himself, he hoped that his right arm
ould lose its cunning when he voted
?or a Republican over a Democrat.
Mr. Douglass concluded with a pat
-iotic appeal for peace and laudatory
Ld pretty remarks about the farmers.
de wanted to see the people happy and
anted to see Mr. Nettles's resolution
arried.
Dr. Pope spoke of the panegyric of
sir. Dougless and of his insinuations
gainst the Weaverites. Then Dr.
Pope declared that there was a take be
ind the action of the committee two
rears ago in allowing Haskellites to re
urn to the party. It was to keep from
lisrupting the party and to bring about
aarmony. White men were at work
ogistering riegroes. He declared that
Lf any one would show him a
Weaveite who had tried to vote ne-1
groes he would be in favor of turning
um out of the party. The liaskellites
uad voted negroes against white men,
ut no Weaverite had done so. (Loud
applause.)
After this the question was quickly
sett led. Mr. Mellett's resolution was
et down on by almost'a unanimous vote
and Mr. Nettles' substitute was carried.
The Weaverites and the Haskelhites and
nd all kinds of "ites" will be allowed
to vote in the next primary provided
they take the oath prescribed by the
Dr. Pope said that he had been in-I
tructed by the Demnocrna of his county
o inquire whether cmbs having a
nembership of less than twenty-ive
bould be disbanded.
Chairman Irby said that it was his
mpression that no county convention
hould allow a delegate from a cluj
which had a membership of leS3 than
wenty-flve. It was the business of
ounty conventions, however, to pass
ipon that question.
On motion of Mr. Douglass the rules
if 192 were adopted as the rules for
his year, a few changes being maae in
lates, etc. The first primary will take
>lace on the last Tuesday in August,
he28th.
A resolution was. introduced author
zing the treasurer to pay the mileage
if the members of the committee.
No election of officers was held, as
hat is not done until the counties se
ect new members of the committee.
On motion of Colonel Neal, Secretary
[ompkins furnished each county with
00 copies of the rules and Constitu
ion of the party.
CR:P CONDITIONS.
he Tuteresting Weekly Balietin ct the
State wt e har Service.
COLUMBIA, June 7.-The following
s the weekly bulletin of the condition
f the weather and the crops thi-ough
ut the State, issued yesterday by State
)bserver Bauer:
The temporary condition varied
reatly during the week, being favora
le and nearly normal for the last days
if May, but on June 1st there came a
old wave that carried the mercury
ow enough for very light frosts in ex
osed places in the Piedmont country.
)amage done by the frost to the har
lier plants was inconsiderable, scarcely
vort noticing, but the low tempera
ure damaged cotton very much and
ecked the fine recovery it was mak
og from the previous cold weather.
aturday and Sunday were warm and
easonable. There was a plenty of
unshine, with a percentage of from 80
o 90 for the whole State. The rainfall
vas generally light or wanting, except
n the range of the counties bordering
)n North Carolina, two tiers deep, ex
ending also along the upper coast.
Chere were showers in Beaufort coun
y. Florence county reports too much
ain, and Williamsburg a plenty. The
eed for rain is widespread throughout
he State a1d the drought Is becoming
erious in localities with sandy soil.
Ll crops would be much benefitted by
general, soaking rain, gardens stand
ng in especial need of it.
Of cotton it can be said that its con
ition is not as good as it was two
reek's ago,taking the State as a whole,
nd during the past week the best that
an be said of It is that it remained at
standstill as the direct effect of the
ew cold nights, but at the present
ime it is next to impossible, and the
ttempt will not be made in this bulle
in to make an estimate predictive of
he crop a month-or two ahead. While
is reported that the stand is dying,
xcept In favored localities; and infest
,d with lice; and developing "sore
hank;" and the ground ickinir mols
ure for growth or germination of late
>anting; and the large leaves shrivel
ng and dropping off and the stalk turn
g red; and fields being replowed and
eplanted; and the crop generally from
wo to three weeks late, yet with plen
y of rain and a continuation of the
varm nights of the past two days, or
general terms,with favorable weath
r the condition of this staple would
mprove rapidly for it is not yet in
uch a hopeless state but that a full
|rop may be made. Much depends
ipon the weather of the next two
reeks.
Corn continues to keep a good heal
by color, but does not gro w much.
Varmer weather will, however, make
Svast improvement in a short time. A
L. little damage by worms noted. Rice
Ioing very well, 'although these cold
ights were not favorable for Its
growth. Oats harvest continues or is
inishig in different parts ot the State',
ad wheat harvest well begun with nn
yen yields of both crops. No change
be noted from. previous reports.
rish potatoes being dug In eastern
ortions of the State. The yield ia
>oor and the potatoes small, but they
ring satisfactory prices. A large yield
o uld have made this a very paying
rop for truck farmers and planters
rear shipping points. Too cool for
weet potatoes. Tobacco doing fairly
tell. Meloms not growing much, and
n localities show a touch of frost.
Lhey are in blossom in some places.
31ackberies ripening with promise of
arge yield, and will be about the only
ruit of any abundance. Second crop
if figs promises an immense yield along
he coast. The few apples left in the
restern counties are .dropping badly.
UIl field crops are well worked and
lean and could stand a great deal of
an. The following places report an
cch or more of rain during the past
reek: Georgetown, 1.00; Beaufort 1.70;
affingham 1 28.
*Chariestoni to Augusta.
The Times and Democrat has within
he last few weeks published several
~rticles, giving at some length the ru
nor that the Atlantic Coast line and
.ousville and Nashville systems pro
>osed to build a new road between
ishley Junction and Augusta. It w as
ctualy known tuat Mr. H. Walter, of
he former system, had ordered a pre
iminary survey of such a line to be
nude with all possible dispatch and
,hat the work had been begun and was
yeing pushed rapidly forward. A con
irmation of all that has been said in
LEhe Times and Democrat on the sub
ect comes from an unexpected quar
en. The Baltimore Sun or June the
kh publishes locally an account of the
ame enterprise and on the night ore
edng a press dispatch was sent out of
hat city covering the same ground.
Ithe Baltimore paper treats the matter
t an actual enterprise and not merely
. a rumor of one. Where it obtained
.s information is not known, but the
ecount which it gives will be read
with interest. The San says: 'The
tlantic Coast Line system and the
[ouisville and Nashville Railroad
0mpay are jointly making a survey
for a ne w road from Ashley Junction.
S. C., to a connection with the Georgia
[ailroad at or near Augusta. The At
antic Coast Line now has a route from
&shley Junction into Charleston, con
ecting with the terminals in Charles
:on which were recently purchased in
:he interest of the Louisville and
bashville Road and which formerly
:elonged to the South Carolina Rail
way. The Louisville and Nashville is
malf owner of the lease of the Georgia
Lairoad from Augusta to Atlanta,
with which the new road will connect.
Lhe other half of the lease is owned by
:he Central Rilroad of Georgia. The
&tlantic Coast Line will make its con
ecton with the proje'ctedl road at or
aar Barn well Court House. The con
truction of this road will give the
[ouisville and Nashville Ratilroad a
erminus on the Atlantic Ocan at
harleston. The Jetties have already
secured twenty-two feet oi water at
low tide, and it is said that this will be
ncreased to t wenty-tive feet within a
year, giving Charleston excellent ship
ping facilities. The new connection
will also make the Atlantic Coast Line
the shortest route f com all points in the
East to Augusta and to nearly all inte
1CREANT DEROCRATS.
SEVENTY-FIVE OF THEM REFUSE TO
RESPECT THEIR PLATFORM.
The State Bank Tax Bill Kiled-The An
nour cement in the House Received With
Cmnfuslon and Applause.
W ASHINGTON, June 6.-Immediate
ly after the routine morning business of
the House Sesterday Mr. Catchinga re
ported from the committee on rules an
order respecting the further considera
tion of the bill to repeal the State bank
tax. It provided for discussion through
out today's eassion under the five-min
ute rule, the vote on pending amend
ments and passage to be taken immedi
ately after assembling of the House to
morrow. Lave toptint remarks on the
bill was granted to all members, the
rivilege to extend over a period of the
ten following days. After a short de
bate between Meosrs. Reed and Catch
ings the resolution was agreed to-93 to
71.
Mr. Springer presented the Eubstitute
of the committee on banking and cur
rency for the original Brawley bill as
follows:
"That the operation of Sections 3,412
and 3 413, Revised Statutes, and Sec
tion 19, 20 and 21 of the Act to amend
existing customs and internal revenue
laws, and for other purposes, approved
February 8, 1875, and all other sections
of said Revised Statutes, and all Acts
and parts of Acts imposing a tax of 10
per cent. on the amount of certain notes
when used for circulatioa and paid out,
be and are hereby suspended as to any
such notes which were originally issued
between Angust 1, 1893, and October
15. 1893, and no such tax shall tue col
lected on the amount of any such notes.
Provided, that nothing herein shall sus
pend the operation of such Acts as to
the tax on amount cf any such notes
paid out and used for circulaton after
January 1, 1894."
Mr. Cox offered his amendment re
pealing all the laws and parts of laws
which impose a tax cn State bank circula
tion.
Mr. Bowers, Republican, of California,
said the bill was intended as a premium
upon the violation of the law; it was a
notification to the banks having made
their pile that the penalty of the law
would not be enforced against them for
subsequent violations, and a notice to
the country that the New York banks,
like the New York newspapers, were to
run the Government.
Mr. Grow, Republican, ot Penns1l
vaia, said a nationil bank was just as
much a local bank as though it had been
chartered by a State.
Mr. Livingston, Democrat, of Georgia,
said the 10 per cent. tax law should be
repealed, because it was intended as a
measure of protection to the naticnal
bank system, and that system no longer
needed protection.
Mr. Talber t, Democrat, of South Caro
lina, said that he would vote for the Braw
ley bill and for the repaal of the 10 per
cent. tax for the reason that the. latter
was in the Democratic platform. For
him, he said, party platforms were made
not only to get in on, but to stand on af
ter he got in. Gentlemen who came
into the House after having been elected
on a Democratic platform and repudi
ated the platform, "spreading them
selves over the face of the earth and not
knee-deep' any where," need not be sur
prised if the people cepudiated them and
the D.emocratic party.
Mr. Q aigg. Republican, of Ne w York,
spoke agaiast t~he proposition to repeal
te existung tax on State bank issues
Mr. Harter, Democrat, of Ohio, de
sird an hcur in which to present his
reasons why the State bank tax should
be repealed, and Mr. Cox, Democrat, of
Tennessee, asked that it be given him
some gentleman on the other side to be
accorded the same privilege. Objection
was made, nowever, and Mr. Harter de
cined to prcceed, saying he had no ambi
tion to rise simply to have his remarks
extended in the Record.
Mr. Kane, Democrat, of Illinois, said
be was a hard money man, believing all
except gold and silver was make believe
money only. He desired to bear witness
to the fact that the paper money, how
ever, cf the United Siates was ,he best
in the world. It was a fallacy to assert
that the money was issued by banks; it
was issued by the Gavernment tbrough
the banks. A alan who Lappened to
have a State or county bond had no more
right to issue notes upon that security
than he had to issue them upon the
security of 400 acres of good firm sand.
Mr. Broderick, Republican, of Kansas,
said the bill was obnoxious, it was class
lenislation of the worst sort. If the tax
ws a good thing when passed, it should
be enforced u-itil the law bad been re
peled.
The arrangement songht to be made
earlier by Mr. Cox was then agreed to.
The late hours, from 3 to 5 o'clock,
were divided between the two sides, Mr.
Harter, Democrat, of Ohio, to occupy
an hour in I avor of the repeal of -the
State bink tax and Mr. Dingly, Rtepubli
can, of Maine, to control an hour in op
position to the report.
Mr. Campbell, Democrat, of New
York, had read a letter from Conrad N.
Jordan, ex-United State treasurer and
president of the Western National Bank
of New York, tavoriug the repeal ot the
tax law.
Mr. Gear, Rsvublican, of Iowa, gave
a leaf or two from his personal experi
ence with the issues ot State banks in
ante-war time as reasons wgy in his
~pinion the people of that country would
not return willingly to that system of
currency.
Mr. Harter said that the trouble with
the country was not that it suffered an
insufficient volume of currency. but from
tbe quality of the currency, its infiexibi
lity and mnability to perform promptly
the purposes of money at the places
where it was needed. A new eystem
.as essential to the rene wed and con
tinued prosperity of the country, and
his belief was that if proper system of
State banks was established, by the end
of he century the country would do its
busess uponl a volume of currency of
css per capita than the volume of cur
rency today.
Soeakingr of the work accomplished by
the State banks in the past, Mr. Harter
said the Government never had such a
iriend nor such an efficient ally as the
Sate banks ot 1860. They were stron
er than the Government, maintaining
gold payments long after the latter had
sus)ended. The national banking sys
tem, he said, was based upon the State
banks, but unfortunately for the country
since the best features of the State banks
had not been taken in establishing na
onal bangs. In conclusion Mr. Harter
pleaded with Republicans, upon patriotic
tax law, asserting that with the accom
plishment of that purpose would disap
pear the greenback craze and the free
silvercraz5.
Mr. Bland, of Missouri: "Not a bit
of it."
Mr. Harter: "I want to say that no
man on the floor of the House gives up
so much in voUng for this bill as does the
gentleman from Missouri. A candidate
for the e'resideaev, [cheers and applause]
the moment he votes for this bill his
platform disappears from beneath his
feet, never more to appear." [Laugh
ter and applause.j
Mr. Newlands, Populist, of Nevada,
said the disease which was sought to be
remed-ed by the proposed legislation
was a world-wide disease, due to fallinz
prices, due to the appreciation of gold.
He criticised the bill because it was in
competent to do that which was ex
pected of it.
Mr. Williams, Democrat, of Missis
sippi, and Mr. Wheeler, Democrat, of
Alabama, spoke briefly, and at 5 35
o'clock the House adjourned until to
day at noon.
After some farther discussion today a
vote was taken on the Cox amendment
to repeal the 10 per cent. tax outri2ht.
The vote was announce& as yeas 102;
nays 170. The following is the vote in
detail on Cox's amendment to repeal
the 10 per cent. bank tax law:
Yeas-Abbott, Alexander, Arnold,
Bailey, Bankbead, Bell (Tex), Black
(Ga.), Bland, Boatner, Bower, Brancb,
Breckenbridge (Ky.), Bann, Cabaniss,
Campbell, Catchings, Clark (Mo.), Cobb
(Ala.), Cockrell, Cooper (Fla.), Cooper
(Ind.), Cooper (Tex.), Cox, Crain, Craw
ford, Culberson, Cummings, Davey,
Dearmond, Denson. Dinsmore, Ed
munds, Ellis (Ky.), English. Claif, En
loe, Esper, Fithian, Fyan, Geary, Gor
man, Grady, Hall (Mo ), Harter, Heard,
Henderson (N. C), Hutchesor, Izlar,
Jones, Kyle, Latimer, Lawson, Lester,
Livingston, Maddox, Mcguire, Mallory,
Marshall, McCulloch, McDearmon, Mc
Laurin, McMillin, McRae, Meredith,
Money, Montgomery, Morgan, Moses,
Neill, Oates, Ogden,O'Neill, (Mo.), Pas
chal,Pattiso,Paynter,Pendieton, (Tex.)
Robbins, Russell (Ga.), Sayers, Shell,
Snodgfass, Stallings, Stockdale, Stone
(Ky.), Strait, Swanson, Talbert, Tate,
Terry, Tracev, , Tucker, Turner
(Ga.), Tairner (Va.), Turpin, Washing
toB, Wheeler (Ala.), Williams (Miss.),
Wilson (W. Va), Wise, Woodsrd and
the Speaker-102-all Democrats.
Nays-Republicans: Adams (Pa.) Al
drich, Apsley, Babcock, Baker (N. H.),
Bartholdt, Belden, 11ngham, Blair,
Bowers, Broderick, drosius, Cannon
(111.), Chickering, Cooper (Ws.), Cousins,
Curtis (Kan.), Dalzell, Daniels, Ding
ley, Dolliver, Doolittle, Draper, Ellis
(Ore.), Fanston, Gillet (N. Y.), Grout,
Grow, Hager, Hainer, Harmer, Hart
man, Haugben. Hepburn, Hermann,
Hicks, Hitt, Hooker (N. Y.), Hopkins
(Pa.), Honk, Hulic, Hall, Johnson
(Ind.), Johnson (N. D.), Kiefer, Lacey,
Linton, Loudenstager, Lucas, Mahon,
Marsh, Marvin, McCall, McCleary,
Meiklejohn, Mercer, Murray, North
way, Payne, Perkins, Pnilips, Pickler.
Post, Powers, Quigg, Ray, Reed, Rey
barn, Rbinson, Settle, Shaw, Smith,
Stephenson, Stone (C. W. of Pa.), Stone
(W. A. of Pa.). Sweet, Tawnev, Taylor
(enn.), Thomas, Updegraff, Vanvoor
his ((Yaio)" -Walker, WMs ger, Waugh,
Wheeler (Ill.), Wilson (Ohio,) Wilson
(Wash.), Woomer, Wright, (Mass.),-89.
Democrats-Baldwin, Barwig, Bretz,
Brickner, Brookshire, Brown, -Bryan,
Bynum, Cadmus, Capeheart, Causey,
Cannon (Cal) Clancy,, obb, (Mo.)
Cockran,.Coffen, Conn, Coombs, Cor
nish, Covert, Dunn, Dunphy, Durbor
row, E rdman, Everett, Fielder, Forman
Greissenhainer, Gold zier, Griffi. Haine,
Hall (Minn.), Hare, Hay es, Hendrix,
Holman, Hunter, Irkirt, Lane. Lap
ham, Layton, Lynch, Magner, Martin,
McDannold, McEttrick, McGanh, Mc
Nabny, O'Neil (Mass ), Pearson, P'n
deton (W. Va.), Ifigott, Rayner, Reilly,
Richards, Ricnardson, (Mich ), Richie,
Rusk, Ryan, Sibley, Sickles, Sipe, Sorg,
Sperry, Springer, Stevens, Talbert,
Tarney, Taylor ([nd ), Warner, W ea
dock, Williams (Ill.), and Wolvertoni
Populists-Baker (Kan.), Bell (Coin.)
Davis, Harris, Hudson, Kern, Mc1Eei
ghan, Pence-8.
The substitute of the Committee on
Banking and Currency for the original
Brawley bill, suspending the operation
of the 10 per cent, tax as to the isues
of the certilicates, etc., by cleariug
houses and other organizations last year
merely changing the verbiase so as to
make it more explicit, was ~defeated on
a viva voce vote. Then the oriainal
bill was loat. This was the end of ten
days debate and a result that occasioned
some surprise, and the. announcement
was received amid much confusion and
applause.
The defeat of the bill would seem to
lay the banks once more open to the
assessrent of the penalties provtded in
the law. Cox's amendment to this bill
which was defeated by so decisive a
vote, provided for the total repeal of the
law, instead of a mere suspension of its
provisons.
It Was Uncie Sam's Money.
SAN FRANCISCO, June 6.--The claim
of $1,000,000 filed against the Stanford
estate by Attorney General Olney as a
preliminary step to enforce the Gov
ernment's claim against the original
holders of tbe Central Pacific grant has
awakened much interest here. It is
now learned that the Governmenlt's
claim was presented on May 26, but
that an attempt was made to keep the
proceeding quiet in order that the fi
nancial operations of the estate need
not be embarrassed. The late Senator
Stanford's estate was recently apprais
ed at $17,600,000. Since the appraise
ment heavy obligatians have been met
and it is stated now that the enforce
ment of the Government claim would
practically wipe out the est-ate,not only
leavinr the widow penniless, out cut
ting off all the beneiciatica under the
late Senators will, including the en
dowment of $?,500,000 to the Stanford
University. It is even said that the
estate, after the liquidation of its ac
knowledged debts, may not equal the
amount of the claim of the Govern
ment. In this event Senator Stanford's
deed of trust, under which Stanford
University was fo-.mded, would not
stand in case the decision of the Courts
should be its favor of the Government
and the University would necessarily
be sacrificed to satisfy the judgment,
Mrs. Stanford in an interview has sta
ted that the Government's claim will
be resisted to tbe fullkst extent of her
ability. Today is the last under the
law which Mrs. Stanford has to accept
or reject the Government's claim. It ik
believed she will simply ignore the
claim, which in law amounts to rejec
to. It will then be in order for the
Government to institute suit, either In
te United States Courts or the Su
preme Court in San Francisco. At
torney General Olney's claim was fled
in te Probate Court in San Francisco,
before Judge Coffee, Nvhere the Stan
ford estate is now undergoing settle
ment.
Kiled by aicar.
ATLANTA, GA., June 4.-Garnet Ar
nold, a ive year-old child, was run ov-r
and tilled by an electric car on the
onsodated Line today.
BRAYTON'S REASONS
F.r Trylriz to Overthrow ihe Iteo14tra10o
Laws.
COLUMBIA, S. 0., June 7.-The fol
lowing lbtter was published this morn
ing:
As I am the one mainly responsible
for the institution of the proceedings
in the Supreme Court to have the con
stitutionality of the registration law
of the State teeted, it may not be amiss
to state the reasons which have gov
erned my action.
This law enforced according to its
provisions is more harsh, restrictive
and obnoxious to funaamental princi
ples than is generally known. It dis
franchises every voter who passes one
registration period without getting bis
certificate, regardless of the causes. If
absent, sick, crowded out or indifferent
he is subjected to the same penalty. It
aisfranchises every voter not previous
ly registered, who moves into a county
after the first Monday in July preceed
ing a general election. Thus, though
he may actually have been a resident
in the county four months before the
election and the constitution declares
that but sixty days residence in the
county preceding an election is re
quired, his right to vote abrogated and
he is remediless.
The law bases the rigat of electors to
vote, not upon the registration, but
equally upon the presentation at the
polls of the certificates of registration.
It is anomalous and un-American to
say that the inalienable and sovereign
right of suffrage must be confined to a
filmsy piece of paper liable to be lost,
destroyed, mislaid or stolen. The put
ting of the closing day of registration
on the first Monday of July is contrary
to the spirit and understood meaning
of registration and is sabversive of the
franchise, making registration close
before it should, and in other States
does, begin, and before the excitement
of the campaign and the nearness of
the election have directed the atten
tion and aroused the interest of the
voters, cannot have for its object the
purpose inherent in registration as de
clared essential by the courts and au
thorities, or abridging suffrage, but its
effect is clearly to deprive voters of
the possession and exercise of their
constitutional rights.
The making secret the registration
records is only destructive of the fun
damental rights of voters and subver
sive of the princinles inherent in regis
tration. A registration to be constitu
tional must Le easy, free, impartial and
public, and its purpose 'should be to
provide for the regulation of suffrage
and to prevent repeating. Some States
and courts consider even this kind of
regulation an illegal restraint and in
fringement of the right of suffrage.
Besides tbe registration books having
been in use twelve years are dilapida
ted, confused and unreliable.
To these constitutional provisions of
the law there are added the irritating,
expensive and unnecessary exactions
of forcing voters to go to the Supervi
sor's office and the getting of new cer
tificates in case of their loss or bhe
moving from the county precinct or
change of residence. Under the oper
ation of this law it is estimated there
are one hundred thoasand negroes and
thirty thousand .whites either disfran
chised or disqualified from voting. In
addition to tne constitutional defects
in tue laws are to be considered the
capabilities it affords for evasions and
oartisan manipulation. Heretofore the
Republicans have had to encounter and
endure these. Those who have not
studied the law or practiced its inii
ties can not comprehend the advanta
ges afforded to those in control of the
machinery or the helplessness of those
victims to Its unfair rexecution. The
division among the Democrats pre
sents a ne w situation. It foreshadows
the time when one faction will be treat
ed as the Republicans have been. This
white men will not submit to aud
when the crisis comes there will be
bloodshed and anarchy. Is It not but
ter to forestall and avert this calamity
by uprooting a law wnich has outlived
the purposes of its creation? It is not
necessary, for elections were carried be
L een 1876 and 1882 witnout it and
and now there is the eight box law to
supplement old agencies. It is h-azard
ous to depend upon the law -being used
for the benefit of the Democrats, be
cause when they divide at the polls it
will afford a weapon for the dominant
side to scourge their hostile brethren.
Besides it is demoralizing to be de
pendent upon these sworn hupervisors
being subjected to the need of commit
ting perjury to favor their partisans
and mane those citizens thus accom
modated and illegally favored parti
ceps criminis.
Such a law, beaides being a badge of
shame to a state, is a serious impedi
ment to its growth and prosperity. To
a self-respecting and independent man
there would be well grounded objec
tions to moving into a State dominated
by such a law and where constitutional
rights are so easily lost or abrogated.
The court can safely set aside the
law, for, if the eight-box election law
is not considered sufficient, there is
time for the Legislature to D.e conven
ed and other laws passed, while if this
law stands and a new' Constitution
is adopted upon the vote at the next
election, wherein not over one-quarter
of the citizens of the State can vote,the
question will some day be raised, and
the new Constitution will itself be held
illegal and void.
ELLERtY M. BRAYTON.
Columbia, June 6, 1894.
Te xas' Cot Con Orop.
HousTON, Tex., June 6.-Tomorrow
the Post., whose crop report last season
proved to be accurate as to. the acreage
and yield will Dublish the first report
of the crop of~1894. The reports are
from every cotton growing county in
Texas and are full and complete.
With scarcely an exception there is a
general increase in acreage, aggregat
ing, on a conservative estimate, at
least 10 per cent, some of the largest
cotton producing counties in the State
showing an increase of 25 per cent. In
one county where no cotton was
raised last year 10,000 acres are under
c ultivation this year. Fabulously high
prices for cotton seed last season-Sl4
to $18 a ton-stimulated prices so that
7 cent cotton meant 10 cents a pound
on old methods where the seed was
wasted. Besides this the immigra
tion has been very large, the new com
ers cultivating cotton througir-necessi
ty and adding to the acreage. At no
time in the State's history has there
been promise of sucn an enormous
yield. In the past few days seasonable
ris have fallen over large area of
country. All reports give conditions
as being from fair to the best ever
known, the latter being in the majority.
Te plant is healthy and vigorous and
the fields are clean and in a good state
of cultivation. No destroying insects
or worms have made their appearance
and the outlook is generally for an
early crop. From present indications
the yield should exceed 52,250.000 Dales
The crop of '98 94 is bet ween 1,900,000
on 2,000,000 Dales and was gro wn un
der the most unfavorable weather con
ditions. This season's crop will be
difficult to handle by Janutary with an
open fall. Ten days ago nolls from
Fort Bend and Bose.eria county planta
tionns wre exhibited here.
SENATOR BUTLER REPLIES
To Ailmanceman's Critcim c Ma Leter
to Chairman Mitchell.
Editor Registor: In your issue of
May 31 a correspondent signing him
self "Allianceman," referring to my
letter in reply to Mr. Mitchel, says: "Sen
ator Butler thinks the subtreasury plan
is unconstitutional, and, of course, it
never occured to the learned Senator
that the Constitution might be amended.
He says the subtreasury has been
abandoned, but fails to give the time
when it was abandoned."
It seems to me "Allianceman" gives
his case away when he impliedly ad
mits that the Constitution must be
amended to make the subtreasury plan
constitutional, and confirms my view.
It is gratifying to be reinforced in my
opinion by "Allianceman," who is evid
ently a man of intelligence, and, I as
sumed, speaks by authority.
In regard to the abandonment of the
sub treasury, it is only necessary to state
what will not be disputed, that two
subtreasury bills were introduced in the
House in the Fifty-first Congress, which
were never reported from the commit
tee, and therefore never acted on. in
the last Congress there were a number
of members belonging to the Alliance,
and in the present Congress there are
quite a number, four or five from
south Carolina. If any one of them
has introduced a subtreasury bill I have
failed to hear of it. I think, therefore,
I was justified in saying it had been
abandoned.
Further along "Allianceman" says:
"He can see no way of the govern
ment owning and operating railroads
except by the government buying
those aiready in existence. Of course
it has never occurred to the versatile
Senator that the government has the
right to build and equip such roads as
are needed. Millions of laborers would
be glad of the job at very reasonable
wages to be paid in legal tender green
backs-building two, three or five
thousand miles a year. Oh, no; the
Senator is too good a railroad attorney
to see any other way of having govern
ment railroads except by purchase of
his client's properity at enormously
inflated valuation of watered stock.
But the people have been thinking
along this line a little in the interest
of the people rather than of the rail
road wreckers and manipulators."
Of course if the government is going
into the business 6f buildsng railroads,
to give empolyment to "millions of
laborers," a very different proposition
is presented. My observations were
based upon the assumption that one of
the Alliance demands was that the nat
ional governmeat should own and op
erate all the railroads and telegraph
and telephone lines, now inexistence,
or hereafter to be built. Such, at least,
was my understanding of it. It seems,
however, "Allianceman" proposes to
change tne issue and have the govern
ment "build and equip such roads as
are needed." Has it occurred to "Al
lianceman" that the Constitution
might have to be amended to enable
the Federal government to "build and
equipt" railroads through the States,
without the consent of the States, in
time of peace? In time of war the gov
ernment might build railroads, as a
military necessity, but I should doubt
whether it had this constitutional
power in time of peace. At least it is
an open question, with the weight of
the argument against it.
"Allianceman" says, "Oh, no: the
Senator is too good a railroad attorney
to see any other way of having govern
mentrailroads except by purchase of
his client's property at enormously in
flated valuation of watered- stock-":
Perhaps it will suprise "Allianceman"
to be told what is a fact, that I never
had a railroad for a client in my life,
except on two occassions, many years
ago, and then for a very shesrt time. It
has usually been my fortune to be on
the other side in railroad cases, so that
my clientage of railroad could not have
been very heavy, and 1 could not hiave
a very large interest in the purchasd of
railroads by the government. Let "Al
lianceman" "pick his flint and try it
again." Very truly yours.
M. C. BUTLER.
Washington, June 2.
Civil War in Ilinots.
PEORIA, Ills., June 6.-One dead
body, several men on the verge of the
gr'ive, a numbsr of others seriously in
jred, $30,000 worth of property abso
ltely destroyed any many homes made
desolate, was the result of an attempt
made to-day by the miners of the Peoria
distfict to close the mine operated by
Little Brothers In Taze well County, a
mile or more back of Wesley City. The
dead man was Edward Blower, of Bar
tonvile, married, shot in the side of
rck and kill instantly. The injured
are James Little, sho'. twice in the
body, thought to be fatally injured:
Peter Little, secretary, shot in the left
eye and in right arm, not seriously in
jured; Peter Little, Jr, shot in the lef t
side; Wm Diedon, colored, shot in right
arm and through left shoulder, may die.
Several miners were shot, out they
were taken away and no one could se
cure any information from them about
anything. The tragedy was tbe sequal
of 6he meeting held at Bratonville the
other day about which there was so
much secrecy. No one could get the
faintest inkling of what was done at
the meeting. Now everybody knows.
It was decided at that time that the
Little Brothers mmnelmust close. There
culd be no equivocation, no half-way
measure. It must close and remain
closed. Inconsequence of the concl us
ion arrived at the meeting abont four
hundred miners started out of Barton
yille at 1 o'clock this af ternooh. They
came from nearly all the mines in the
district. Without anything being pre
viously said on the subject, except in
the utmost secrecy, every man appar
ently came armed. They were desper
ate and were ready to use desperate
means to accomplish desperate ends.
Sheriff Frederick, of Pekin, Tas well
County, having teen advised of the
trouble went to the mines with a posse.
The strikers crossed the Illinois on
boats and were me t on the side by the
sheriff who commanded peace end rea
oned with them In vain. Led by a
stalwart miner with a revolver in esei n
hand, crying, "Follow me." they
charged on the mine. The two Littles
and tneir sons and a colored man re
treated into the tower over the shaft
and opened fire on the besei gers, some
of whom fell. The fire was returned
and the men in the tower hoisted a
white ig for surrender. rhe firing
was hotly continued and the tower rid
died. The shaft was set on fire and the
aid shaft closed. The crowds ied mf
dismay, as it was feared the powder
house would be ignited. Later accountS
show that of the party besiege - JanlL
Jackson, a negro, was killed. E i Lit
tie was shot in the breast and may die
There were eight or ten miners im the
shaft and it is teared all were suffocat
ed. Among~ these are Gas and Fred
Morit z and John Rockey. Ed Blour,
one of the afttacking party, was killed
and half dozen othe~r strikers were
wounded, It is believed two more of
the strikers will die. Tne Sheriff and
posse have returned to Pekin. They
were una ble to handle the mob. The
milds exitement exists.
TILE PROilIBITIONIS US
WILL NOT PUT OUT A STATE TICKET
THIS TIME.
All Catddidates to be asked How They
S.ard Upon the Prohibition Question
Much Fo1!tlcs IDj.ctfd Into the Dis
cuseloas.
COLUMBIA. June 8.-Te State Pro
hibition Convention was called to or
der yesterday afternoon at 6 o'clock by
State Chairman Childs, who made a
speech to the members. Col. J. A.
Hoyt, of Greenville, was elected Chair
man and Rev. W. J. Herbert and T. J.
Lamotte were elected 3ecretaries.
Nearly all the counties in the State
were reDresented. After the transac
tion of considerable routine business the
committee on platform reported the
following platform of principles, which
was unanimously adopted:
We, the reiresentatives of the prohi
bition sentiment of South Carolina, in
convention assembled, thanking God for
his mercies and praying his blessing
upon our efforts in his cause, issue the
following declaration of principles:
1. We believe the use of alcoholic
liquors to result in an enormous in
crease of the death rate of our country,
adding aboat 100,000 annually to the
death roll.
'2 We believe alcoholic liquors used
as a beverage to be one ot the most
potent ageacies in the ruin of moral
character.
3. We believe at least three-fourths
of the crime committed in our land to
be traceable to alcoholic liquors,
4. We believe the liquor traffic to be
one great cause of the fearful financial
depression now generally felt in our
country, since it annually drains about
8900,000,000 from the pockets of the
masses and instead of giving value in
return paralyzed productive energy of
an equal amount, ($900,000,000) thus
making an annnal loss of nearly $2,000,
000,000 to the legitimate trade.
5. We believe traffic in that which is
against the peace, good health, safety,
commercial prosperity, and moral char
acter of a community, State or nation
to be in violation of the real rights of
men and thecefore inherently wrong.
6. We believe all forms of license of
the sale of liquor as a beverage to be
morally wrong, and in vilolation of the
highest purpose for which government
exists.
7. We believe the State should pro
hibit absolutely the sale of liquor as a
beverage and should provide for its
sale only for medicinal, mechanical
and sacramental purposes, with such
regulations and provisions for enforce
ment and penalties for violation, as
may be expected to prove efficient.
S. We believe that to make any pro
hibitory law effective, the executive
and other officers of the law should be
in full sympathy therewith.
Joel E. Brunson, Chairman.
J. R. Gibson,
Chas. P. Wroy,
R E. Mason,
E. L. McGowan,
Arthur Kibler.
A motion was made to put out a state
ticket, which provoked a long dises
sion, but it was finally voted down.
A resolution was adopted that the
State porhibition executive committee
be authorized and lastructed to forma
late ques'.ioas to be put to candidates
tor State offices and for the Legislature
and Senate in accordance with the plat
form adopti d by this convention, as to
tneir position upon the same, in order
tb.at the friends of prohibision through
out the State may vote intelligently in
the primary.
The following resolutions were also
favorably reported by the commtittee
and adopted:
Whereas. We believe that the cause
of prohibition will be best advanced at
this time by the election of members
of the Legislature, who are pledged to
tue enactment of a prohibitory lawL
rather than by the nomination of a:
State ticket.
Resolved, That it be the policy of the
Prohi bitionists of South Carolina in the
coming campaian to use every effort to
secure the election of members of the
Legislature who will make prohibition
paramount to every other issue before
the people.
RvsoIved, That each candidate be re
quired to pledge himself for prohibi
tion before he receives our vote.
The election of the State prohibition
executive committee was entered into
and one member chosen from each
county present as follows, the vacan
cies to be filled by the local organiza
tions in the counties not-represented:
Abbeville-B. L. Stuckey.
Aiken-Rev. 3. C. Brown.
Anderson
Barnwell-D. L. Wooten.
Beraeley-Peter Klintworth.
Beaufort- -
Clarendon-Joseph Sprott, Jr.
Charlestonx-O. S. Thomas.
Darlington-G. T. Grisham.
Cnester-- .
Edgeiield-John Lake.
Fairtield-R. H. Jenning.
Florence-..
Greenvill:-J.A. Hoyt.
Hampton
Harry- --.
Lancaster-W. C. Thcmson.
Laurens-J. W. Shell.
Lexington-J. J. Fox.
Marion-W. J. Montgomery.
Marlboro-J. P. Gibson.
Newberry-A. H. Kahn.
Oconee-R. E. Mason.
Oraogeburg-R av. R. P. Golphin.
Richiand-L. D. Childs.
Pickens-.
Sumter-E. 13. Smith.
Spartanburg-J. L. Sifley.
L nion- -.
Williamsburg- -.
The committee held a meeting and
organized, electing Mr. Childs, chair
man.
The convention adjourned sine die
at 2 o'clock this morning
The'Or~her side.
COLUM3An, S. C., Junie 7.- The press
dispatenies a few cdays ago gave the
impression th-at the Governer had talk
ed to au unsvmpa'uetic and. unappre
cative audience. Information has
reached here from private sources that
the' Governor macde a fine impression
and that when he had tinished ne took
a himd primary of the convention. TLhis
resulted in anr ove-rwhelmiflg majority
in favor of the Dispensary iaw. The
majority was on tue strength of the
Gjve-rnor's sp"'ch. The New York
Times says: "Governor Tiliman's de
caru~irns were constantly greeted
with a storm of dissenting voices and
applause. Wuen he closed his speech
he aisked all who wanted prohibition
or uoing to raise their hands, and
then be asked those to vote who would
favor a State Dispensary law if they
could not have prohibition. It was 3
to 1 for a Dispensary law, and with a
parting 'OYi, I got y ou!' the Governor
left the plattorm." "Governor Tillman
had several times when stopped by dis
seniog cria, delare I thet he would
win the audience for the Dispensary
law, anrd whvn, at the close of his
sp-ech, he polled the audienee, as al
ready describwd, it was with him by an
evenvriemmin majority."