The herald and news. (Newberry S.C.) 1903-1937, December 29, 1911, Page SIX, Image 6
REASO"NS PARDOMNG RU-NTE.
Blease Explains Action in Lauren
Murder Case-Governor Goes
Into Details.
The reasons moving Governc
Blease to pardon G. Wash Hunter, a
which have been placed in the papei
in the case and, therefore, a part 4
the public record of the office will 1
of general interest. Governor Blea
will transmit these reasons to the lel
islature along with those in each ca.
in which he has exercised executih
clemency. The reasons follow:
"Hunter, G. Wash, (white.)
"Convicted of manslaughter at t1
November, 1908, term of court f<
Greenwood county, and sentenced I
eight years' imprisonment in the Stai
penitentiary.
"The defendant was charged wii
-murder for the killing of one Elbe:
F. Copeland, in the county of Laurent
was tried, found guilty of manslaugl
ter and the verdict set aside prompt]
and immediately. He was afterwar
tried three times in the same count
and soon after the mistrial was orde:
ed, a motion was made to change t
venue, which was heard by the san
judge who had ordered the mistri
and forced the defendant to trial; wa
argued during the session of the civ
court at Laurens and the change i
venue was granted, which, In m
opinion, was one of the greatest tra
estles on justice, because of the weal1
and influence of the deceased, that h
ever been perpetrated in this State.
Taken to Greenwood. .
"The case was transferred to t1
county of Greenwood, in preference
any other county in the circuit, no
withstanding Greenwood's well-knov
prejudice in regard to drinking whi
key and gambling, which to my ce
tain knowledge, among some of tl
citizens, is hypocritical, yet it had i
weight in this case. The case w,
brought to trial in that county. T]
relatives of the deceased, with the
wealth and influence, employed, ,
their counsel in that county, a mc
who it was publicly stated could ma
a jury of Greenwood county do an
thing that he told them to do. A ve
dict of manslaughter was the resu
The case was appealed to the supren
court and, in both courts, in my hui
ble opinion, the defendant was givt
a raw deal and his case was not give
that consideration which should haa
been given by these courts.
"In deliv'ering the opinion of tl
State supreme court, and I beg you
very carefully observe the words que
ed here, Mr. Justice Woods said:
"'The contention that the judgme>
should be reversed ibecause the reco:
does not show that the grand ju:
had found a true bill, requires no fu
ther notice than to say that no su<
position was taken in the circuit cour
and, therefore, can not be considere
on appeal.' 63 S. E. Rep., page 686.
"That opinion was delivered Fehr
ary 23, 1909. July 19, 1909, the sat
judge, writing the opinion in the ca;
of the State against Lazarus, said:
In Lazarus Case.
"'Under this exception to the rul
it must be held that where the law r
quires the presentment of the gra2
jury as a condition precedent to tV
trial of the crime, the grand jury is ti
constituent part of the court, and wit]
out its presentment the court has
jurisdiction of the cause; hence,
appellate court will declare void
conviction obtained in such cast
without the presentment of the gral
jury for lack of jurisdiction of tl
subject matter in the trial courts..
In such cases this very lack of jurn
diction, in the trial court, will decla:
the conviction of no effect even whe:
the .point is not made in the tri;
courts.'
"Now, by reading the two decisioi
of this very distinguished, conscie:
tious and Christian judge, you will si
that in the Hunter case he says 'ri
quires no further notice than to se
that no such position was taken
the circuit courts.'
"In the Lazarus case he says, 'wi
declare the conviction of no effec
even where the pcint is not made
the trial courts.'
"Now, why is it that in the Hunt<
case, what has been the law of th
country ever since the Declaration.
Independence must be set aside, at
in the Lazarus case, only a few wee]
later, he returns to that well estal
lished old principle of law and di
clares what is and has been the la
-namely, that the question of juri
diction can be raised at any time, ev<
in the s1m;re21e court?
Says Court Reversed !Itself.
"I do not know why it was niece
sary for the court to reverse this lot
standing principle of law in the Hu:
ten case, and then immediately
back and rev'erse itself by reversji
the Hunter case and declaring on'
my opinion, and as individual have of-i
ten expressed it privately and public
s ly in no uncertain terms, but as chief
executive of the State I will not criti
cise a co-ordinate branch of the gov
ernment-to wit, the judiciary, be
ir cause, were I to say here what I be
.d lieve in regard to the matter and what
*s I hav'e said both in private and public
f conversations as a, -private citizen, it
>e might by some be construed discour
;e teous to the court. In my opinion, as
- a criminal lawyer of 22 years' exper
.e ience, and a practice which has made
e for me a handsome living and paid
for several State campaigns (as I had
no other. income,) I most positively
e assert that if the original and well
r known principle of law had been fol
o lowed and recognized in the Hunter
e case, he would have been granted a
new trial. Then, again, he comes to
a justice of the supreme court and
asks that the case be held up until he
can appear in the lower court to make
a motion for a new trial. Even that,
Y which had been extended to. many
others, was refused him and he was
informed that he would have to go
on his term of service, and that there
was nothing to prevent him from
L making the motion on circuit after
Le
a3 he had begun his service .in. the peni
tentiary. See 70 S. E. Rep., Page 306.
- This was refused Hunter. but we no
A tice, as late as December, 1911, when
a rehearing was asked in the supreme
court, certain wealthy and influential
defendants walked about at their leis
ure even for some time after the su
preme court had refused a rehearing.
Why this very sudden change in the
rulings of the court just at the time
e he Hunter case i..peared again?
to
t- Petitions From Your Counties.
"In view of the hisILry of this case
s and strong pctitions signed by about
r- 700 people and coming from four
le counties, viz., Laurens, Newberry,
ts Greenwood and Abbeville, and signed
by such men as Col. Thos. B. Crews,
Senator J. H. Wharton and Hon. David
ir H. Magill; also signed by several of
the jurors requesting a pardon, I par
Ls 2
doned the defendant, and I thank God
that I was in a position to save this
boy and his relatives fro mthe hu
miliation and the disgrace that was
it. attempted to be heaped upon him.
I"I submit herewith the entire case;
the brief in the first case on the ques
tion of change of venue, which will be
found in 79 S. 0., -page 91; the brief in
the appeal from Greenwood county,
which 1Will be found in 63 5. E. Rep.,[
685; the brief as submitted to the sux
ipreme court of the United States and
to the arguments of counsel in the State
tand United States su-preme courts, and1
I beg and .beseech of all honest and
ait impartial citizens to read the records
rthoroughly before they criticise me!
for granting this pardon and to parti
rcularly compare Judge Woods's lan
guage in the Hunter case and Judge
Woods's language in the Lazarus case,
and then find out if a very near rela
tive of any of the supreme court jus
a tices married a Copeland, and I am
ie satisfied that after you hav~e given
se careful study of the case, as I have
done, that you would have done as I
did, but, see Judge Woods in February
*e, and in July, so short a time and so
e- different.
id "In conclusion, I think this a proper
le time and place to call your attention
lto the dissenting opinion of Justice
i- Jeremiah S. Black, in the case of Hole
10vs. Rittenhouse, 2 Pbila, 411, in which
tn he speaks as follows:
a Justice Black's Opinion.
asi "'When a principle of law is estab
id ished by a long series of decisions,
le without a single case on the other side,
.to carry it out in plain good faith is
s- as sacred a duty as any judge has to
re perform. His notion that it ought to
re be otherwise is not entitled to a mo
a.1j ment's consideration. It is no part
of our office to tinker at the law, and
is patch it up with new materials of our
i- own making. Suitors are entitled to
sit just as it is. Bad laws can be borne;
ebut the jus vagum aut incertum--the
y law that shifts and changes every time.
in it passes through the courts-is as
sore an evil and as heavy a curse as~
11 any people can suffer, and no people
:t, who are fit for self-government will
in suffer it long. Even a legislaitor, if he
is wise and thoughttal, will make no
achange which is not absolutely neces
isary. ,Legislative changes, however,
af are prospective, ~and disturb nothing
d that is past. i>ut judge-made law
s sweeps away all the right which may
Ihave been acquired on the faith of
eprevious rules. For such wrongs even
w the legislature can furnish no redress.
s- When the scales of justice are shaken
Sby the hands that hold them here,
there is no power elsewhere to ad
'just them. . . . If each new set of
3judges shall consider themselves at
iliberty to overthrow the doctrines of
a- their j,redecessors, our system of jur
tisprudence (if system it can be called)
ig would be the most fickle, uncertain
e1 and ;'icious that the' world ever saw.
ninistration would be an immortal
:hing in comparison to the short-lived 1
>rinciples of Pennsylvania law. The
'ules of property, which ought to be
is steadfast as the hills, will become
is unstable as water. To avoid this f
,reat calamity I know of no resource
ut that of stare decisis. I claim
aothing for the great nen who have
7one before us on the score of their
marked and manifest superiority; but
[ would stand by their decisions be
.ause they havie passed into the law
a,nd become part of it, have been re
lied and acted on, and rights have
grown up under them which it is un
ust and cruel to take away.'
"If the supreme court of our State
would follow this principle possibly
t would be easier for the citizens, in
cluding the members of the 'bar, to
form some opinion as to what its de
ision would be in important matters,
r at least determine what the law 1s."
ROUND TRIP WINTER TOURIST
FARES
NOW IN EFFECT
...-via
SOUTHERN RAILWAY-"PREMIER
CARRIER OF THE- SOUTH."
Tickets on sale daily including April
30, 1912, with final limit returning May
31, 1912. For complete. information as
to schedule, sleeping car service, etc.,
call on nearest Southern Railway
ticket agent, or
F.- L. Jenkins, T. P. A.,
Augusta, Ga.
J. L. Meek, A. G. P. A.,
Atlanta, Ga.
Attacks School Principal.
A severe attack on school principal,
Chas. B. Allen, of Sylvania.,Ga., is thus
told by him. "For more than three
years" he writes, "I suffered indescrl
bable torture from rheumatism, liver
and stomach trouble and diseased kid
neys. All remedies failed till I used
Electric Bitters, but four bottles of
this wonderful remedy cured me com
pletely." Such results are common.
Thousands bless them for curing stom
ach trouble, female complaints, kid
ney disorders, billiousness, and for
new health and vigor. Try them. Only
5c. at W. E. Pelham's.
Now is the time to subscribe to
The Herald and News.
CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY RATES.
Account the Christmas holidays, the
Columbia, Newberry and Laurens rail
road announces very low round-trip
rates from all points on its line, tick
ets on sale December 15, 16, 17, 20,
22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31 and January 1,
1912, with final limit to return Janu
ary 8, 1912.
For full information regarding rates,
etc., call on Ag*ents or write J. F. Liv
ingston, S. A., Columbia, S. C.
ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROP
ERTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1912.
I, or an authorized agent, will be
at the following places n:amed below
for the purpose of taking returns of
personal property for fiscal year 1912:
Newberry, January 1 to 9, inclusive.
Kinard, Wednesday, January 10.
Whitmire, Thursday and Friday,
January 11 and 12.
Jolly Street, Monday, January 15.
Pomaria, Tuesday, January 16.
Walton, Wednesday, January 17.
Glymphville, Thursday, January 18.
Maybinton, Friday, January 19.
Prosperity, Monday and Tuesday,
January 22 and 23.
Little Mountain, Wednesday, Janu
ary 24. -
O'Neal1, Thursday, January 25.
St. Lukes, Friday, January 26.
Longshores, Monday, January 29.
Silverstreet, Tuesday, .)anuary 30.
Chappells, Wednesday, January 31.
And at Newberry until February 20,
after which date a penalty of 50 per'
cent. will be added against all persons,
firms or corporations failing 'to make
their returns.
The law requir.es a tax to be charg-'
ed on all moneys, notes and mort-'
gages, also an income tax on gross in
comes in excess of $2,500.
There shall be a capitation tax of
fifty cents on all dogs, the proceeds
to be expended for school purposes.
Dogs not returned for taxation shall1
not be considered as property in any
of the courts of this State.
All male persons between the ages
>f 21 and 60 years are liable to pay
poll tax, except Confederate soldiers,
or those persons incapable of r-aaing
aiapport :from a:being maimoed of
Nothing but personal property is to
>e assessed this year, but all persons
vho have bought or sold any real es
ate since last return are required to
iote such transfers on their returns
or 1912.
All property must be assessed "at
ts true value," which is construed to
nean "the sum of money for which
,uch property, under ordinary cir
-umstances, would sell for cash."
Please do not ask that your prop
,rty be Itaken from the auditor's du
Dlicate the same as last return, for
,he law requires that all property
nust be listed on regular tax return
3lanks and signed and sworn to by
person listing same.
Name of township -and school dis
xrict must be give on every return.
EUG. S. WERTS,
Auditor Newberry County.
Newberry, S. C.
DON'T DELAY.
ome Newberry People Have Learned
That Neglect Is Dangerous.
The slightest symptom of kidney
trouble is far too serious to be over
Looked. It's the small, neglected trou
Les that lead to serious kidney all
ments. That pain in the "small" of
your back; that urinary irregularity;
those headaches and dizzy spells; that
weak, weary, worn-out feeling, may be
nature's warning of dropsy, or fatal
Bright's disease. Why risk your life
by neglecting these symptoms? Reach
the cause of the trouble while there
et is time--begin treating your kid
neys at once with a tried and proven
kidney reinedy. No need to experi
ment-Doan's Kidney Pills have been
curing kidney trouble for over 75
years. Doan's Kidney Pills are used
and recommended throughout the civi
lized world. Endorsed at ho;ne. Read
Newberry testimony.
John W. Reagin, 2015 Eleanor stree.,
Newberry, S. C., says: "I can strong
ly recommend Doan's Kidney Pills and
I advise their use in all cases of kid
ney trouble. My back was weak and
there were pains through my loins
and kidneys. Doan's Kidney Pills
brought me entire relief."
For sale by all dealers. Prica 50
cents. Foster-Milburn Co., Buffalo,
New York, sole agents for the United
States.
Remember the najme-Doan's-and
take no other..
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF NEWBERRY.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
Walter L. Herbert, Thomas'G. Herbert,
C. C. Herbert, Mary Bryce Herbert,
Lillie Haynes McMullen, Hattie Lee
Haynes Morris, Abba Haynes and
L. B. Haynes, Plaintiffs,
against
Campbell Bryco Haynes and Hilliard
Galbrath Haynes, Defendants.
By virtue of an order of the Court
herein, I will sell to the highest bid
der, before the court house at New
berry, South Carolina, within the legal
hours of sale, on Tuesday, salesday,
January 2, 1912, all that piece, parcel
or tract of land lying and being situate
in No. 8 Township, County of Newber
ry, State of South Carolina, containing~
four hundred and fifty (450') acres,
moe& or less, bounded by Beaver D)am
creek, land of W. I. Herbert, land of
estate of I. H. Boulware, the Bouk
night Ferry road, land of Hannah
ohurchl and others. Also, all that other
piece, parcel or tract of land lying
and being situate in No. 8 Township,
County of Newberry, State of South
Carolina, containing sixty (60) acres,
more or less, bhounded by Beaver Dam
Creek, land of W. I. Herbert and the
Schumpert mill road.
Terms of sale: One-third cash, and
the balance in one and two equal an
nual payments, with interest on the
credit portion from day of sale at the
rate of 8 per cent. per annum, interest
payable annually, said credit portion
to be secured by a bond of the pur
chaser and a mortgage of the premises
sold, said bond and mortgage to pro
vide for 10 per cent. attorney's fees in
case of collection by suit or by an at
torney, with 1-eave to the purchaser to
anticipate the payment of the credit
portion in whole or in part. Purchas
er to pay for papers and recording of
same. H. H. RIKARD,
Master for N. C., S. C.
Master's Office, Dec. 11, 1911.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF NEWBERRY.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
Corrie Kennedy and Rufus Eichelber
ger, Plaintiffs,
against
Jesse Eichelberger, Louise Eichelber
ger, Cannon Eichelberger, Fred
-Eichelberger and Earle Eichelber
ger, Defendants..
By virtue of an order of the Court
herein, I will sell to the highest bid
Jer, before the court house at Newber
:ya & . Car.nMn. "within ethe lasral
January 2, 1912, that lot of an ly
and being situate in the town of New
berry, County of Newberry, State of
South Carolina, described as follows;
all that piece, parcel or lot of land ly
ing and being situate in the town of
Newberry, County and State aforesaid,
containing one-half (1-2) of an acre,
more or less, bounded on the north by
a street separating it from land of
estate of William Langford, deceased,
east by lots numbered 1, 2 and 3, west
by lot No. 19, and south by lot No. 7.
This being lot No. 20, of a plat of land
surveyed by James F. Glenn, survey
or, on the 15th day of December, 1890.1
The said plat is now of record in the
office of the register of mesne convey
ances for Newberry County, in Book
No. 6, at page 407. The said lot of
land was conveyed to Lucinda Eichel
berger by Thomas F. Harmon, execu
tor of Cora B. Harmon, deceased, on
the 7th day of January, 1902, and the
said deed is now of ecord in the of
flee of the register of mesne convey
ances for Newberry County in Deed
Book No. 12, at page 6.
Terms of sale: One-half cash, and
the balance in one year, with interest
on the credit portion from day of sale
at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum,
interest payable annually, siid credit
portion to be secured by a bond of the
purchaser, and a mortgage of the
premises sold,s aid bond and mortgage
to provide for 10 per cent. attorney's
fees in case of collection by suit or
b an attorney, with leave to the pur
chaser to anticipate the payment of the
credit portion in whole or in part.
Purchaser to pay for papers and re
cording of same.
IL H.RIKARD,
Master for N. C., S. C.
Master's Office, Dec. 11, 1911.
STATE OFSOUTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF NEWBERRY.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
The Newberry Real Estate Company,
Plaintiff,
against
James J. Lane, the First National
Bank of Clinton, S. C., the Palmetto
National Bank, Carolina National
Bank of Columbia, S. C., the Bank
of Columbia, S. C., South Carolina
Loan and Trust Company, Georgia
Chemical Works, M. S. Bailey & Son
and Wallace B. Todd, Defendants.
By virtue of an order of the Court
herein, I will sell to the highest bid
der, before the court house at New
berry, South Carolina, within the legal
hours of sale, on Tuesday, salesday,
January 2, 1912, all that piece, parcel
or tract of land lying and being situate
in the County and State aforesaid,
containing ten and 71-100 (10 71-100)
acres, more or less, bounded by a
public road known as the "Columbia
road," by land of S. P. Crotwell, by
land of Henry M. Sligh and by a tract
of land containing six and forty-two
one-hundredths (6 42-100) acres, more
or less, conveyed to the said James J.
Lane by Henry M. Sligli on February
15, 1907. Also, all th&+ other piece,,
parcel or lot of land lying and being
situate in the town of Newberry, Coun
ty of Newberry, State of South Caro
ina, containing 'seven and fifty-eight
one-hundreds (7 58-100) acres, more
or less, and bounded ot. the north by
other land of J. J. Laue, east and
south by a branch whicb separates, it
from other land of the Newberry Real.
Estate Company, and n~u the west by
Glenn street. Being the same tract
of land conveyed to the said James J.
Lane by the said the Newberry Real
Estate Company on the -1st day of
February, 1906.
Termis of sale: One-third cash, and
the balance in one and two equal an
nual payments, with interest on the
credit portion from date of sale at
the rate of 8 per cent. per annum, in
terest payaJble annually, said credit
portion to be secured by a bond of the
purchaser, and a mortgage of the
premises sold, said bond and mortgage
Ito provide for 10 per cent. attorney's
Ifees in case of collection by suit or
by an attorney, with leave to the pur
chaser to anticipate the payment of the
credit portion in whole or in part.
Purchaser to pay for papers and re
cording of same./
H. H. RIKg..D,
.Master for N,. S. C.
Master's Office, Dec. 11,/911.1
ISTATE OF SOUTH CARLINA,
COUNTY OF NEWB 'RY.
COURT OF COMMON PLANS.
H. L. Parr, Plaintiff; vs. Nannie W.
Davenport, Marth( M Hipp and Ola
E. Wilson.
By an order oil the Court herein I
will s.ell to the Nighest bidder, before
the Court hous$ at N3wberry, S. C..
within the legdAl hours of sale, Tues-!
day (salesday) January 2, 1912, all
that lot or lyarcel of land situate, lying
and being in the town of Newberry,
State of E%outh Carolina, containing
fifty-seven one hundreds, (57-100) of
an acre,Jmore or less, .id bounded.by
Coesreet,' Ny -lotf'Z --W B
land, known as town coui.l lot, th, I
5ame being the identi aA! lot of land
3onveyed to Nanii.: W Da-enport by
Wfartha C. Schump!:t by er deed dat
Ad, the 7th day of October, 1903.
Terms of sale: Onc-ha'J of the pur
:hase money to be paid in cash, the
)alance in twelve months, at the rate
Af 8 per cent, per annum, to be se
ured by a bond of the purchaser an
3. mortgage of the premises sold with
leave to the purchaser to pay all his
bid in cash, said bond and mortgage.tO
ontain a stipulation of 10 per cent.
f the amount due thereon, as attor
ney's fee in case said bond and MO
gage is collected by suit or placed in
the hands of an attorney for collef-I
tion. The purchaser shall be requi.
to pay $500 immediately when said
property is kpocked down to him, and
shall be required to insure house on
said lot in the amount required by the
master, and assign the policy over to
the master as required by said order
herein, and in case of failure of' the
purcbaser to , insure said hiouse," the
master will insure the same at the
purchaser's. expense, in sich amount
as he may deem proper and ciArge
expense of policy to purchaser *fth.,
interest on S=e at the rate per
cent. per annum and charge same to
the purchaser when be pays inhb
bond and mortgage. The purihaser
to pay for papers and recording of'
same. H..LRTK RD,
Naster.
Master's Offiee Dec. 11, 1911.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
COUNTY OF NEWBERRY.
COURT OF COMMON PLFAS.
The Newberry Savings Bank, Plain-7
tiffs, vs. Frank G. Spearman, Jr., and
John R. Spearman, Defendants.
By an order of the Court herein I
will sell to the highest bidder before
the court house at Newberry, S. C.,
within the legal hours of sale on Tues
day, January 2, 1912, all the interest
and estate -of Frank G. Spearman,. Jr
in all that tract or plantation of land
situate, lying and being in the Coun
ty of Newberry, State of South Caro
lina, containing three hundred and
forty-seven (347) acres, more or less,
and ibounded by lands of Mrs.'Fanlie
Maffett, A. J. S. Langford, Thoma
Henry Spearnman ,d Sallie R. Hud
son, (formerly 3. S. Speaarman, J. I.
Spearnan and G. C. Wilims.)
Also all the interest and estate in
all that other tract or plantation of
land lying and being situate in the
county of Newberry, State of South
Carolina, containing two hundred and
forty (240) acres, more or less, and=
bounded by lands of, or formerly of,
Will Sanders, Charlotte V. Spearman,
and others, being sometimes known
as Little River Place, of the' late John
R. Spearman, the said interest in said
lands, both tracts, being derived un,
der the terms of th-e last will and tee
tament of the late John E. Spearman)
deceased,' the grandfather of the de
fendant Frank G. Spearman, Jr.
Terms of sale: One-balf the pur- 4
chase money to' be paid in cash, the
balance on credit of twelve -months~
the credit portion to be secured by the4
bond of the purcha'ser and a mortgage
of the premises sold with interest atj
the rate of 8 per cent per annum, and[
in case said bond and mortgage is col
lected by suit or put in the hands of
an attorney'for collection, 10 per cent,4
must be added to the amount dues
thereon, as attorney's fee. Thle pur
chaser may pay all his bid in cash if
he so desires. Purchaser to pay for
papers and recording of same.
H. H.RIKARD, ~
Master..
leaster's Office, Dec. 11,. 1911.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF NEWBERRY.
COURT OF COMMON PLERA-S.
The Newberry Real Estate CompanyK
Plaintiff,
.vs.
Hannah B. Leitzsey, Defendant.
By virtue of an order of theC
herein, I will sell to the highes
der, before the court 'house at
berry, South Carolina, 'within thl
hours of sale, on Tuesday, sa
January 2, 1912, all that piece,
or lot of land lying and being
in the Town 'of Newberry, Count
State aforesaid, known sand designate~
as Lots Nos. 101 and 102, Block "6D,2
fronting 50' feet each on McCaughr3in
avenue, and running back thereformn
two hundred and nine feet each, wif
a width in the rea.r of fifty feet each;'
said lot being more fully described on;
a plat of a portion of the land of Thei
Newberry Real Estate Comnpany, made
by F. W. Higgins, surveyer, on the.
18th day of October, 1905, and now g
rcord in the office of the register of
mnesne conveyances for Newberry
County in Plat Book "D," at page's23)
and 211.
Trmns of sale: Cash. Pur
pay for papers and recording or