The herald and news. (Newberry S.C.) 1903-1937, July 07, 1905, Page 2, Image 2
the signatures of the Commissioners
subscribed to such certificate.
8th. Tha: the Chairman of the
State Board of Canvassers did not
forward addressed to the Governor
and Secretary of State, by messenger,
the returns, poll books and all papers
appertaining to the election.
9th. That notice of the election
was never published in any public
newspaper or county newspaper in
the county of Pickens by-authority of
the proper Board of Election Com
missioners as required by law.
ioth. But that said election was
held by the County Supervisor of
Pickens county and his Clerk, they
appointing the Managers of Election,
and if the votes were ever counted
and the election declared, it was done
by the County Superviscr and his
Clerk without warrant of law and not
in accordance with the Constitution
and Laws of this state as provided in
Chapter 1o, Code of Laws of South
Carolina, 1902, Volume i. page 97,
regulating the manner of holding
general and special elections which
states, "All general or special elec
tions held pursuant to the Constitu
tion of the State shall be regulated
and conducted according to the rules
and principles and provisions 'herein
_rescribed."
ith. That your relator refused to
take part in the said election or to
vote on the grounds above mentioned.
12th. That the said election was not
conducted as other special elections
for the following reasons, (a) That
the Managers of Election were not
appointed by the Commissioners of
Election for Pickens county. (b) That
the return was not canvassed by the
County Board of Canvassers of Pick
ens county, nor the result of the elec
tion declared, nor did the County
Board of Canvassers keep any records
or minutes of the returns or results.
(c) That the Commissioners of Elec
tion of Pickens county took no part
in the said election in any manner,
shape or form. (d) The said Board
was not requested to appoint Mana
gers of Election by the County Super
visor, or to take charge of said elec
tion in any manner whatever. (e) The
Polls were opened at nine o'clock A.
M., and closed at four o'clock P. M.,
when the Law requires that they be
open at seven o'clock a. m. and kept
open until four o'clock p. m.
13th. That the County Supervisor
of Pickens county and his Clerk at
tempted to appoint the Manage:o of
the~ said special election and to de
clare the result of the election, if it
was ever declared at all, and if it was
ever declared at all, your relator is
not aware of it.
14th. That the result of the said
special election was never declared or
published as required by law.
z5th. That the Supervisor of Reg-'
istration did not furnish the Managers
with the Registration books, nor did
the County Supervisor or Supervisor
of Registration file a list of the quali
fied electors with such Managers.
16th. That no complaint of irregu
larity or illegality in the said election
was made .by your relator or anyone
else because there was no one to make
it to, as the Managers of the election
that was held, were not legally ap
pointed, and that no protest or con
test was filed either with the .Mana
gers or any one else because the elec
tion was never legally declared nor
the ballots legally counted. And
furthermore that there was no one
for your relator or any other citizen
to legally protest or contest the elec
tion before, as tie election was held
in an unlawful manner by parties un
authorized to hold the same.
17th. That the returns were not
dated or sworn to, nor signed by the
Managers of Election who attempted
to hold the same.
18thl. That the result of said elec
tion was not declared and published
as required by law.
Igth. That the County Board of
Canvassers did not approve the return
and certify the results, with the nec
essary papers to the Secretary of
State. neither did the Secretary of~
State certify and publish that the said 1
certificate and other papers had been
filed in his office.
20th. That there are three thousand
registered voters in the county of
Pickens who are qualified voters, out
of the said number of voters less than
one thousand voted in the said elec- 1
nion, for the reason that they along
with your relator did not desire to I
take part in this unlawful election.
21st. That your petitioner has not
to form a belief as to the other alle
gati::s of the Reply, and therefore
denies the same.
For a further and additional reply,
your relator alleges:
21 1-2 That persons were allowed
to vote at this said special election
who did not present their certificate
of registration and their poll tax re
ceipt, as required by law.
" 22nd. That Section 7 of an Act en
titled "An Act to Provide for the
election of the state board of control,
and to Further Regulate the Sale,
Use, Consumption, Transportation
and Disposition of Intoxicating and
Alcoholic Liquors or Liquids in this
State, and Prescribe Further Penal
ties for Violation of the Dispnsary
Laws, and to Police the Same," Ap
proved March 6. 1896; and as amended
by the General Assembly of South
Carolina at the regular session of 1904
and approved the 25th day of Febru
ary. 1904. is unconstitutional and void
in that the said section of the said Act
is in direct violation of the constitution
inhibition contained in article 3 Sec.
34. Clausei1 of the Constitution of
South Carolina of 1893. which is as
follows. "In all other cases, where a
general law can be made' applicable
no special law can be executed." That
the said secion 7 is an attempt on the
part of the General Assembly to pass
a special law to limit the operation of
the "Dispensary Law" to certain spe
cial localities, and the Act being de
prived of its character as a general
law becomes a special or local law.
That the alleged election was attempt
ed to be held under the provisions of
the said Section, and is therefore i'
legal and void.
23rd. That by virtue of the provis
ions contained in Article 8, Section ii,
Constitution of 1895, the General As
sembly has the right to prohibit the
manufacture and sale and retail of al
coholic liquors or beverages within
the state, and may license persons or
corporations to manufacture, sell and
retail alcoholic liquors or beverages
within the state under such rules and
restrictions as it deems proper, or may
prohibit the manufacture and sale and
retail of alcoholic liquors or beverages
within the state under the exercise of
its police power, and your petitioner
avers and so charges that it cannot
delegate this power to its citizens in
special localities to be determined by
their votes as to whether they shall
be subject to the exercise of the said
police power. That the said section
of the act is an attept to delegate
said power and is therefore uncon
titutional, null and void.
Wherefore, the relator, your peti
tioner prays tahat the said return here
n be dismissed and election be de
:lared illegal null and void, and that
:he prayer of your petitioner *be
granted.
J. S. Wilson,
W. Boyd Evans,
Att's for Relators.
Personally appeared before me J. S.
Wilson, relator herein, and makes
>ath that the foregoing is true of his
>wn knowledge, except so much as is
stated on information and belief, and
ts to that he believes it to be true.
J. S. Wilson
W\hen the pleadings had been read
Thief Justice Pope stated that there
sere at least two constitutional ques
ons raised and that tihere were ques
:ions of fact upon which there should
e some testimony and he sug
ested to the attorneys that he might
-old after hearing their arguments
hat it would be necessary to have
some testimony, and therefore the at
:orneys might be saved the labor of
irgument by agreeing to submit the
natter to a referee to take testimony.
I'he weather was very hot to make
irguments and to listen to them.
Mr. Carey stated that his side was
-eady to go on with the hearing and
sas willing to admit practically every
:hing that was charged in the reply
md to show that even if what is
:harged is true that it came too late.
Mr. Justice Pope thought, however.
'hat there were nytters or facts in dis
>ute and which were not admitted
md upon which it was necessary to
ake some testimony.
Mr. Carey said that he was prepar
d to showv that it makes no difference
vhat the facts are now that the elec
ion must stand and he would show it
v decisions of our supreme court.
Mr. Melton said that they were pre
>ared to show that thcre had been no
egal election.
Chief Justice Pope said that he did
o thi-k on judg should be called
on to pass on these constitutional d
questions as either side had the right c
of appeal and it would be best to have
the case heard by the full court. He
thought an order of reference to take h
testimony as to disputed matters
would be the better plan and in a case
of this kind the question should be I
probed to the bottom not as a politi
cal question but as purely legal and
let the decision fall wherever it might.
That the best plan was to grant an
order of reference to take te.imony
and let the whole matter be referred
to the full court. There is no whiskey
in Pickens now and it can't be sold
there and no harm of a moral nature
can come. He said he had no right
to call the supreme together but there
would 'have to be testimony and the :
whole matter could come up before
the supreme court in November. Mr.
Pope said his mind was running in
that way and indicated that that might
be his decision even after hearing
argument and he made the sugges
tion to save the time of the lawyers. I
Mr. Melton thereupon moved that
a referee be appointed and that the
matter be referred to him to take tes
timony and report.
Mr. Carey insisted that in his opin
ion such a proceeding was .useless
and that it seemed to him that the
case would have to be heard before
Judge Pope unless the other side
abandoned their case and started
anew. As to the constitutional ques
tions they will have to be passed upon
and the Chief Justice would have jur
isdiction. Mr. Carey said that he had
set forth in affidavits in their reply
suc!h testimony as they would have
if it went to a referee and that the
reply of the respondent was simply
an argument as to the appointment
of managers, etc. The whole history
of the case is set out in the papers
and a referee could do no more. He
said that they admitted that the ap
pointment of the managers and the
management of the election were all
under the direction of the supervisor
and that he was prepared to show
by Justice Pope himself that the su
pervisor had a right to do so. Mr.
Carey said that he was ready to sihow
that Justice Pope has held that the
managers are the sole judges of the -
qualification of voters. That after
the election it was held too late to
raise these collateral questions. Ac
cording to his view everything vital
to the question was stated in the pa
pers and that he admitted there were
irregularities.t
Justice Pope said that it would be
a long time before he would as a
judge hold that fraud in election is a
mere irregularity.
Mr. Carey said that he admitted
that fraud would annul an election
b)ut that no fraud was charged in this
:ase.
Mr. Melton stated that they had
stated facts in their reply showing
fraud; that an illegal vote is not ir
regularity. They stated that not one
fourth of the qualified electors had
signed the petitions and it matters
not how the election was held that
being a condition precedent to hold
ing the election no legal election can
be held without it.
Justice Pope had his mind made up
not to hear the case but to refer it to a
referee so he granted the motion of '
Mr. Melton and asked who counsel
would suggest as referee. In doing
so he remarked, "If one-fourth of the
qualified electors did not sign the pe
tition it should be known."
After conference the attorneys
a.greed to suggest A. 3. Boggs, Esq.,
Clerk of Court, of Pickens county,
as referee and the following order
was passed.
On hearing the petition for man
amus and the return to the rule to
sI ow cause and the reply thereto and,
Bz appearing that certain facts are dis
puted and constitutional questions
raised and all the issues being such
s should be heard hy the supreme
c.urt and not a single justice thereof
t is ordered:
That the proceedings herein be re
ferred to A. 3. Boggs, Esq., as special
eferee to take such testimony as
ither side may desire to offer on the;
ssues of fact herein and report the'
aid testimony to the supreme court
with his conclusion of fact thereon
and that said report be filed on or by
me second Tuesday, in September
ext, with the clerk of the supreme
ourt, copies thereof to be furnished
o counsel on both sides and that mat
uesti)n is decided by the supreme
Curt.
Y. J. Pope. Chief Justice.
Mr. Chief Justice Pope stated that
e 1uld ask the suprene court to sit
I September immediately after the
1ing of the report to hear this case,
ut he could not say of course
vhcther they would do so or not. 1
.HE NEW IDEA WOMAN'S
MAGAZINE.
August Number
The Passing Of The Blouse.
Noting the wayward tendencies of
ashion in the New Idea Woman's
Jagazine for August, Charlotte Mill
vard says: "While the name of
blouse' has been retained as a con
enient term to designate a bodice
>r shirt-waist not having a skirt of
ike material, the garment itself is no
onger as loosely fitted as formerly.
Elhe exaggerated pouch is a discarded
eature, and a strong tendency is as
erting itself toward the draped or
lart-fitted bodice. Last year the
eparate blouse was a blouse, properly
peaking, and the dart--fitted effects
vere reserved for costumes. But
)ame Fashion is a fickle jade, and
mong the smartest blouse -models
ire numbered several of these new
lesigns. A novelty is certain to have
.omething of a vogue, and as the
:losely fitted bodice is dressier than
mne of the loose order, t'he advancing
eason is likely to find this style the
ad for theater or restaurant waer.
3ut just as surely a fad they are cer
ain to remain, in spite of the threat
;ned invasion of the high-busted cor
et. Whether this last fact has any
thing to do with it or not, the Louis
Lnd Directoire coatee bodices are
reatly admired, and the combination
>f wide revers, flare cuffs and jaunty
ittle peplums achieve some charming
esults. Particularly when made of
brilliantly flowered brocade or taffe
as, and worn with a lace or plain
:olored silk skirt, the coatees give that
ld-picture look so sought after by
ur devotees of fashion. In fact, quite
number are exact copies of the bod
ces depicted in the portraits of the
>eriods mentioned."
Season Tickets Via. C., N. & L.
The Columbia, Newberry and Laur
ns railroad offers Season Tickets to
he following points, limited until
)ctober 31st, 1905:
Asheville, N. C. $7.05
Alexander 7.35
Arden 6&75
Biltmore 7.0o0
Brevard 7.90
Flat Rook 6.30
Fletchers 6.65
Hendersonville 6.4o
Hot Springs 8.0o
Murphy 11-30
Saluda 6.oo
Swannanot 7.35
Tryon 5.6o
Waynesville 7.80
Lake Waccamaw 9.30
Wrightsville II.70
Carolina Beach .5
Georgetown 8.30
Conway 10.10
Isle of Palms 7.90
F'OR BARGA
FURNI
HOUSEHOL
KihIer, Dc
NEW BER
Sullivans Isin:3 7.90
Waterloo '.95
Cross Hill 1-95
Glenn Springs 4.45
Spartanburg 4.10
Greenville 4.05
Parties wishing to purchase tickets
to points beyond Spartanburg will
lease notify me before the trains are
:ue, that I may arrange to have tick
Dts ready on their arrival.
For schedules or further informa
tion phone or write,
T. W. Denning, Agent.
Dr. R. M. Kennedy,
DENTIST.
Newberry, - - S. C.
OVER NATIONAL BANK.
Best Mineral As
phalt Roofing.
C. H. CANNON,
Near C.. N. & L. Depot
Just received
2 car loads' of
Buggies.
I car load of
Wagons.
and a lot of up
to-date and first
class Harness.
All to be had at
REASONABLE PRICES at
A T. BROWN.
W ORK
BY A
ROE ENISE
Newberry
Steam*
Laundry Co
INS
TUR E
.D GOODS
RY. S. C.