" Sipi tftttHer ln?dn)M< ?hcoptkrt.onhc JthxrtfxHMM* no ttofottlMttfiii xnu rtot ri cJCll mh*?qu*M i Journal pf a UMr and i*?l ty a French traveller. with remarks on tb* totfnury, It# orU, literature, and poll, ties, an?lWMWOrM ario custuni* of itt initabi ?anta. in ?*>. ?5,iiviM*m?7 ThiaU the most entertaining-Journal tliat wo have perused for * Ions time* Not with Minding the ettbrtsof a-few malignant scrib* SsTaSSSSytfa:sufMms. Easi^swjViSKs of a common form of commonUn guftge* similar habits, and <119 tamo principles of public and municipal law JKencn the inter eat which is excited by a plain and sensible journal) like .the boob before us. We travel Or Ws temarKi. It ia not unworthy of note* that' this friendly oflico of bringing together John 9oli arid Brothfer Jonathan, is performed by a Frenchman. Would that all the individu al* of th*se nations were thus kindly disposed! He inform* u? that he apeut nearly two year* in Great-Britain without any other object than to see the country t that he was born in Franco, and had resided more than twenty years in the United gtates before ho made this voyage. Hence he H),fble,to compare the customs of the different countries; and hp does it with perfect mod humor and without any appearance of pre judice or partiality. In the following extract the reader will find three nations introduced : " If I was a*Kow$ to take Voltaire ?t 1 said they were mo We tin,fit it 1 ** Tho lower Efiglahd hpid other nft.| ?ion? In thorough contempt. Tito samo rank in prance, In the interior of the country at leastd scarcely know there are other nations?their I geography is that of the Chinese* I " (Mr all the various merits claimed by the prqud fslsndors, I believe none is less disputed I ed thing tli [meaning politeness ana mere snow 01 s< imsnts, the othur for simple and blunt genci ty. The fact Uf M to giving substantially, it is much easier for tho English to do so ? that an Englishman has always plenty I of money, and gives it away very freely, out nol sacrifice of higher kind is supposed to be above his magnanimity. I have to remark on thisl subject, that those who give n little, after oro-l mising much, appear to havo given nothing, while those who, without promising auy tiling, give a little, have credit, on the contrary, lorl giving a gJeat deal. This accounts, in part, for the two opposite reputations, the one for un meaning politeness and. mere show of senti *m4' * ncrosi y, that I ? English to do so than the French, ami accordingly much more is giv-l 'en in money bv the former than by the latter )| but 1 doubt oxtrcmcly whether the English arc more disposed, than their neighbors, to bestow I their time and personal attention upon their i friends in sickness or misfortune, ana upon tho distressed in general. There is in England a sort of fastidious delicacy, coldness, or pride, which stands ajgpod deal in the wayof active bo* nevolence. . The ties of blood are also, 1 think, weaker than in France. People seem to calcu late witk mrtre strictness hew far the claim of kindred extendi,! and even the highest degree ef consanguinity, that of parent* and children, Kleins to command rather less deferenee and respect. A cousin may certainly net be more I to you than another man, yet it Is an amiable er ror, end a useful one, to think yourself obliged to show some kindness and feel some particular I aymnathy for the man vrhom nature has placed nearly in the same rank of Hfo with yourself, and whom you are ,Hkely to meet oftenest Mi your journey through life. ? ?/ 44 The English a^ better reasoners titan the French, and therefytfe more disposed to be juit ?the first of moral anilities f and yet tho pro pensity to luxury ami Ostentation is ho strong, as well as so general Here, as to expose this same sense of justice to hard trials. I never knew pi prodigal Who was just, nor lndcc4 truly gonejrftUS -4* never has it in his power. ? I do not conceive It possible for some of the most horriblo scenes of toe French revolution to bo acted here, in any evtut. Tho people \u France are capable of greater atrocities than those of England, but I should think tho latter sternefv?less prone to cruelty, but lest suscep tible of pity. ** There* are perhaps* at thie moment, mor* distinguished men of Science at Paris than In I?ondoi?p andl think it is admitted by the Eng lish themselves. But there are certainly better scientific materials here* and in tho long run, accuracy and depth should prevail over quick ness of parts. However the account may stand between the t wo nations* as to tho higher scien ces* 1 am convinced that cultivation of mind l? more general in England than in Franco: it is indeed the bright side of English society* That conceited ignorance* forward loquacity* heed less and round argumentation* which All the common intercourse of men in France* is com paratively unknown here; and with so much better reasoning faculties* I do not think there it half ao many logical attempts. A man of sense once remarked that he never heard tho concluding formula JOonc introduced fn a Pari sian conversation* without oxpccting something excessively absurd to follow immediately. / " There is undoubtedly in tho English ubnrt a coldness and reserve wnich discourse and re pel at first sight I in the French* on the contra ry* a warmth anu openness which Invite confl uence* ami put yon at ease Instantly* The hit* torian* (Jihhon* said once* in sneaking of French aociefy* " I know that generally there it no de pending much on their professions* yet, as far oh I wrw concerned* I really believe they tiNfi sincero." The exception the historian made in Ills own favour may well excite a smile j yet his error was in the general opinion ho had formed* not in tne individual one. The kindness shown to strangers* and the exprettions of interest lavished upon them, are really felt at the roe ment. Tnelt feelings might not last long* nor bear tho test of ant greet sacrifice of private Interest or convenience. Those who express them are Inconsiderate and frivolous* but nq insincere. Ido net know whether 1 might ?* choose to live with the BngtlMt* but J shoul undoubtedly find more pleasure In visiting the French. The reserve and coldtcss of the for mer wear off 1a time | tho frtvmth < cools* and the two manners meet at tUJexr, which it the common an * i ui ins ?or rtSfwt r, nrtonl Iocs not p t *>e drawn frfBchman , .'as might show* tfie *4o ftimilar ones in fb ?ccasionally in this jour fcfllTOWfjww&JW ?eyw W attention wastaltod this work. I can only gay for myself, tliat I prefer the EoglUh Ktcrature to (he French, up on most of .those subjects with which I nm ac ?uaintcd. I am aware of the dancer to whidi expose inysolfby this rash declaration| and **hall not deprecate the national resentment of toy Jftench reader#, by common-place ctfnfcgai ons of my own unfitness to judge. Many tyi doubtedl v havo a more genera! knowledge than I hate of the literature, not only Of their own cooritry,-but of both countries. Few, howev er, of ray countrymen choose to make arty fo reign language so far their own, as to be fuir judges} and on this last qualification moatly, I venture to rest my right to form an opitdon of my own, and avow it. My French readers be injr uow informed that the English have du (Jout, will hear with less surprise than they would ??? tlicrwise havo felt, tiiat they have de la Gniet?. They do not certainty possess tKo gaMe of manners of their neighbors?they have not the happy faculty of being amused without amuse mant, 1 tlnnk also that English spirits would not have survived the trials fwWhicn the French have been exposed f the latter have this buoyan cy ii| their blood, the former in thei'. mind on* lyj but mirth b by no means so foreign to Eng manners as is supposed in France. Indeed 9 not kitow whether alaugh, a true joyous laugh, is not as common in the one as in the o ther country: less animattoi ther country i and althoeth there is infinitely less animation, 1 doubt whether there irlesa; cheerfulness. 44 Upon the whole, I believe the national dif Terence to have less reality than appearance.? 'lite same vices, and the same virtues?the same propensities and views, under very different forma, are found in both countries, and more nearly alike than is generally supposed."?Port Folio. FORKWN LITERATURE, SCIPA'CR, fee. By English papers, it Appears that I?oroylc< gave them all their liberty, and rewarded esc Mcottliug to the services m Imd rendered, fact is relateJ of ens of thoee tinrroes which serves a place in this rapid otitjifie. A Mi man wb? belonged to one of the princtpal niardst and who wa*deepfy in love with a * man or his own complexion, by whom he Mi veral children, was obliged to see her tora f?| his arms and forced to comply with the shl ful desires of his master, lie made severs* effectual effort4 to obtain Justice from the 1 nals of the island, and received nothing punishment from his proprietor, tie < venues nco against the wretch who had thi orcised upon him such unfeeling tyranny/ the descent of the ftngliih nffWdc'd a f?t