The telescope. (Columbia, S.C.) 1815-1818, January 09, 1816, Image 3
mcf to enforce their execution according
r true iutont awl meaning;-' And in order
rtain that, cur courts do permit the lawn
country, where the Contract wu made* to
. ved to the itirv> of the coUrt ef chancery,
case may he. m fact* entering essentially
ie Nubstuiice of the contract. But* in do
th'u, thny di? not act under the <qpmmnridt
Jie authority of the sovereign of that na*
Nor arc tliey exercising any portion of
licial puwers. They are only expounding,
ng and superintending the execution of
v of thfir own statu which authorises that
if proceeding.
ttiou^.i tiierw arc the bent reasons for per
; our courts to sustain t?uUt? of thin i lo
in, there i* no good reason why ono na
ould authorise It* judiciary to carry the
nws of another into execution, and it is
d, that no nation hmrever done so. And,
il readv l?een stated, there is n.? orinriple
?ml law which auth inset one sovereign
ower or 'direcf the judiciary of another to
Such a right can he acquired by coin*
nly. And wo shall presently nee whether
esttha**o'ncpuired it Witlmutsuch com*
fu/ilive from justice cannot even be de*
?d, as of riyht, to he delivered up to the
iln oi"t'?e nation whose lajvs he has violate
cli Irs,, can he he tried mid punished by a
tribunal for violating them.
c'i a syrttem shall once beudopted it will
ij.*e a strange kind of mosaick war lUtotho
ry of nations. Here a Cadi sitting in
?nt upon nit Italian denying thpl'opes in
ty. There the stern leathers bf the Ho
iSsition, putting a poor Ttyrk to the rack
ft he denies that Mahomet 1* the Prophet
I. The judges of liiDiwb|{(?ltLJ(liviiiia
ig an Knglishinan for libelling Rovstty ?
o court of king*# bench inflicting the same
nent upon an American for libelling the
niiwt of thft United Htates, for tlic late
ttlnnofwafc' * r
til v? ? ' That tlie government of the United
although it |?v llll mcnilH pOHSeSSCS tllU
sovereignty of Otis vast empire, tint groat
en thereof \till remaining with the states
ivoly, is nevertheless* as to all the pur*
or which it was created, am! onto all the
\ i' -toil therein, it ii I t*HH whc/c it is other
-ovided bv the Constitution, completely
gu.? - Ami that its sovereignty is an en
epnratc ami distinct from the sovereign*
e respective states, as the sovereignty of
to i? nenarate ami district from that of
r. Mii that, unless an before expected, it
exercise the powers that belong to tlie
?verument, nor can any state government
0 the power* which belong to it. Ami
ere is no tine thing to which this prior i
>lies with more strength than to tho reve
tho United States ami thing* appertain'
veto. It being notorious that a uasire to
injures# complete ami entire control ovur
iject'was the yreat anil moving principle
culled the pronent Constitution into (lic
it is admitted, however, that there art
ccntions to this Ia4 principle, they are
owevcr, a* only prove the. rule itself,
?v t"P second section of the third article
'(institution, among other things it is de
that "the judicial power of the Uuitcd
shall extend to controversies! between
< of different states, Itetween citizens of
c ?tat?, claiming lands under grants of
it states," #cc. ? These powers in the na*
flints belonged to the state sovereignties,
?v were, at the time of the adoption of the
tution, in complete possession of them,
ild the courts of the United States, mere*
ich, by any principle of construction have
1 them : lint there were seasons, at that
?cmcd siiHieient to justify the extending
ioial power of the united States to them,
v were extended to them, without, how*
'iking n way the jurisdiction of the state
so that, as respects those matters, the
urts and the courts of the United States,
urut rent jurisdiction, by compact.
? things being premised, I return to the
i : fan Congress, by any act which ij
b, authorise the state courts to exercise,
in them* any portion of the judicial pow
e United State* : more especially that
of it which is employed in enforcing their
tws ? ,
ll not stop here to prove that the act in
ni is, us respects this case, a penal law, or
enforce the payment of its penalties, in
y or form whatsoever, would be to exc
? enforce it. . These are self-evident pro
is which would only lie obscipcd by any
? to elucidate them,
?Imll I waste 'much time in considering
?our courts can resist an unconstitution
Tti^t question, as it respects our state
ts lorilKHinro been settled in Virginia,
dee|*Totb?of her courts have lieen occtii*
? by the General Assembly, v/lth that
and magnanimity which belongs to it.
trgument It murft stronger as respects
i of f.'ongrefe, the legislature of a sepa
I distinct sovereignty) by whose laws wo
bourtd, unless, to use the very words of
ktitutioh, they are 11 mad? in pursuance
M Was It otherwise, were the state
blijp.-d to execute every law which Con
ight pass, without enquiring whether it
vas not made in pursuance of the consti
t is most manifest, that the justly dread*
of consolidation would not only lie be
thai, in principle, it would be complot
I that state sovereignty and Mate indo
le would soon ceaso to'oxist,
ave already teen that the government of
ited States, is, as to the pufynses for
t was created, a separate and distinct
rtfy, having rights, powers arid diitie-,
is Imund (o exercise and discharge it
I which it cannot communicate to the
er whieh it presides, and which they
intermeddle with, and that the Judicial
irms a portion, and a most important
t is, of its sovereignty.
ove seen that there is nothing in univer
or the usave of nations winch will an*
* ?^|J>vcr','*nt<>' J^nveit >u
newer, or anypartofit, in the court* of another,
or direct them to execute it i more especially
that portion whlchrespccts its penal code.
If then Congress luu n right to vest that, or
any other portion of the judicial po\Ver Of the U.
States, in the state court*, it mutt be to virtue ?
oCaome compact* Hut there if no other instro-|
ment from which such a compact can be infer
red but the constitution of the United States.
Let us then a*e where it hat deposited the iudU
cial power of the gouersl government, for, where
it tioM placed it, thereit must remain.
That instrument does not take tlv# least notice
of the Htate coilHf respects this subject.. But
it declares, section 1st of the Od article, that
" the judicial power of the United States shall
I h\ vested in one supreme court* and in such in*
ferior courts as Congroas mar from time to time
ordaiu and establish " Ann by the 8th section
of tho 1st article power in given to congress " to
constitute tribunals- inferior to the supreme
court.0
This judicial power then, the whole Of it, with
out any exception, la given to this supremo court,
and those ihwrlor courts to be ordained and e
stablislied by ^congress. It haf tiejter yet been
contended that cohgrea* can comjiel or author
ise the stfttetourtsor any of tlicm to perform
the functions of this supreme court, fly what
kiq4 of rcoHon'm- then can it support a claim to
exercisesuch a power with respect to the func
tions of those Inferior courts ? Did congress or*
d*fa and establish thestoto courtt? Did it de
cree tlieir existence ? Did it appoiut their judg
es ? Did it Institute, did it settle, did k consti
tute them ? Most certainly it has done none of
those things. It found them already ordained
and e*tablishCd,and finding thorn so ordained
and established, it has by its. law directed them
to exercise this portion of the judicial .power of
thp United States.
But the judges of these inferior courts are to
have olllces which they are to hold during good
behavior. No^w 1 take it for grnnted tlmt the
man who holds an office, is an officer, and an of
ficer too of that government whose business it Is
the duly of Ids office to perform. And by the
fld section of the 3ri article of the Constitution
44 all officers of the United States arc to lift com
missioned by tho President," which the state
judgett tire not.
liut who dot* the Constitution intend shall
decide upon tho goad behavior of the judges ol
these inferior courts ? Most unquestionably tho
Sojnttoof the United States, upon impenchmeut
bv the House of Representatives. So great an
absurdity cannot be supposed, as that the t '(in
stitution intended to put tho judicial power ol
thn United State*, or uny part of it, into tho
hands of judges in no wise responsible to its gor
ver lime lit. Vet no man can pretend that the
state judgos can be impcached and tried by that
government.
$??!
Hesides. the Constitution of the United States
does not provide that the state, judges shall hold
their offices during good behavior. Congress
cannot direct that it htmll We n?hy law, In
feet, some of them arc elected for n llmlttCd pe
riod, and others may be removed br
their state legislature*. So that If ?
grew should be -very tin
states, the judges cf ' *
risk of their comml,
Moreover, the iud^_
called upon by fhissct to exercM
cr, which they hold s.t the will ol ,
Which may be taken from them" by Wftf very
breath which gave it-? and which, it is. almost
certain, will lie taken from them, whenever by
a Ann and independent exercise of their own
judgments they shall much Olfend that honorable
body. So that under this aystcm, neither the
people or the government of the United States
would have that security for the uprightness of
tl.iir judges which the constitution contemplates.
Hilt the judges of these inferior courts are al
so to receive for their services, a. compensation I
which shall not lie diminished during their con- 1
tinnance in office, nor during tho existence of aj
particular law, culling for particular servicos.
Prom whom aro they to receive this compen
sation ? Certainly from the general government,
to which these services are to be rendered. Hut
do the sfnte judges receive, or are tliev to re
ceive, any compensation for these services to be i
rendered, to the United States ? Kvcry body |
knows thut they do not. And we know*, that if)
uny judge of (his state was to accept either
commission or compensation from tho general i
government, ho would by that act vacate his of*
fice.
Bat it is nni<t, that the atatexourts do fake
cognizance* of suit* brought to enforce contract*
made in foreign countries, nml that they will
take notice of lljose foreign law*, under the
faith of whi<h' such contracts were mndn, nfltl
enforce, them agreeably thereto, and t'?at thi*
xuit wounds in contract. |fut ho\V does it sound
in contract ? Jfa* the defendant oontro tn*| f??
nay the amount of thin penalty to th?> phiintilVr
No, it i 4 answered. it in not precikulv ?n. Hot
it is understood to ho a principle of universal
law, -that every citizen anil subject him entered
into an implied contract, that fie will obey the
law* of hi* countrv ? that the law* of hi* coun
try, subject the defendant to the payment of
?this penalty?that this suit in founded on that
contract, ami the state court has for that reason
jurisdiction over it. Indeed! Hut In'fore we
vield o?tr assent, let us *ee how far this reason
ilig will carry oh. It is sometimes said, that
an argument' 'which necessarily proves too much,
proves nothing.
V)v t'ti* same implied contract, every citicen
ft suhjigt of every government, has agreed to
submit his head to the block, or his neck to the
cord, whenever the law* of his country require
him to do mo. If therefore, this implied Con
tract will give us jurisdiction' over this penal
law, and justify u* in enforcing its sanction, the
same principle will give us jurisdiction over the
entire penal code of every nation on earth, which
no man can pretend to say we have.
Upon the whole, however painful it may he,
and actually la, to uh all to be brought hy amuse
of duty Into conflict with the opinions and acts
of the'IiVgulaturo of the t\ Btatea, for which
we entertain theliighest respect. and the con
fctUutionft) }*w? of which we Ceerlt our duty to
obey and execute with cheerful new, \>hen their
execution devolves upon us | yet we cannot re
^uttho conviction* that thin lew is, in this res*
pect, unconstitutional.- It in the unanimous opi*
Lion of thbrcourt? that to i??ume jurisdiction
Over thisca^e would beto cxercise a portion of
tli6 judicial power of the tTnited States, which
by tho Constitution* in clearly and clintincly dc
poetted.in other hands j and tnat by ?o doing
we should prostrate that very instrument which
we have taKefi a solemn outli to nupport.
"^COMTMMl .1.
JAWt'tRV 9. 1H1<T
Suvun. rytf t\rcign AVw^Tlrc *hp Ain.abie MkVl*
(la, arr i vcd'at New-York, on th? $4th litem 30 <tyr? from
li verponl, has brought London pai>cr*tO Nov*r 20 and
L?. papfcr* to the 22d.?? -Tlio trial of Marshal Ncy,'it
appears hail cloicd' before tlio council ol* war,, where it
had been to long pending ? that council, adopting the
plea advanced by the councel of tho marshal, declared
the.r incompetence to try luni, alledg.ng that m ho wan
/peer of Franco, he could Ikj t r ed only by the chamber
? of 'peers i consequently, on the 11th of Noveinlter, tic
king oT Franco' issued an ordinance to the chamber of
pc*M, directing them to proceed without delay to the
fr nl of marshal Ney, accused of lugh treason, kc^?
The pruva ling opinion was that the chamlxv of peer*
would coiideitin hun. The partition of some of tht
minor State# of Europe hy tho Congress of Vienna had
ven much offence, and much time muiit elapse l>cfotv
tlio satisl action of nil pnrtics, which can alone restore
peace a-id good order, will manifest it>elf amidst the
clashing interests of the numerous Continental Na
tions.? dreadful explosion took place .u.l/mdon on
the 1 5th ult. hv (he buri?t ng of n ateam Ixulcr, u*ed by
Messrs. CSonstadt and Co. Hiigrir refiners, Well street,
;n n new process lately discovered for the qu.ck re
flncmcnt of augur.? The explosition bur.eil m the heap
of runts it pr?Hluccd, the bod.es of more tliuh twcnlj
t>ersoii* i nino only of ?hi? mimlier were cxtne. ted fron?
the ruin* with l.fc?Tlie hws of pro|>ci ty estimated fct
?35, W |>otmds stcrl.ng.? ? The London 8un of the 2Uth
November rltttcs, that uctive exert >on? were making to
ohla.n teamen fur the Niger frigate, capt. 8. Jncfoon j
and that the moment the wa* ready, the lion. Mr. Infant,
uin ster to the I'n.tcd 8(a.tes, would embark mid pro- 1
ccdon hiit embassy .??Tlio great City ol Cxs\n, ,n
H'issia, has Iktcii almost destroyed hy fire.? ? IV.cc <?
cotton, Prime Upiatul, Is. 7d. ? New-Orleans Is. 8d
? Hca-Idand 2*. 5d. a 3*. &l.
? ?
W.lliam W, Ilitndfnot, was, on tho first in?t. elected
a Director of tite8ouUi<CarolinaliiMirance Company. 1
I. yV loiter received at Charleston, by the Kditorof tlic
' Southern l'utr.ot, froin lim correi[x?i?lctH, at Wash.
ngiOti City, dated Dcccml>er the 24-h, says ? " <ieiK-i.il
.I *cx*ox ha* l<ft Washington lor the South Western
Country, lie was much indisposed, n.id suflcrcd i giMx'.
deal from a wountl -in hi* arm for several days, hut tip.
' peared quite recovered previously to h.s departure. ? lie
?tale* A Imtdf, without Imitation, to be a nulive fivuth
whieb, of cour*, putt an em\ to tvory doubt
it point."
British Picket, with a King's Messenger, carry.
? mttlfod Treaty, nailed from Ncw.York on the
lit. dnect for Falmontb, England.
Liverpool pjipcr of the 3 lit of Octoltfr, it is
that gvtod* to the Minotuit of fit teen in.il on* ster
ling, have Ixren shipped fromCJ. IJmain aince the pcao
Tlte l^egistiUnru of North-Carolina, previous to ;u
adjournment [the 21st nit.) d tecicil the Coventor *?? .
purchase on l-chalf of the ntatc, a Hut tie ( of fimrrtt' I
lI'mhinqK/n, and cause the same to be erected m the
iduiii passage of tlic Slate-House.
It litis l>ccn propo?ed, m the legislature of l'enn*yl?
vitn ?, to " d ssolvc the chartered pr.vilegc* of all or any
of tlic IT. nk s w i tli m the rommnnwtiiKli, that have re
fused <o piy s|?ccie for their Notch."
M.?Jor CSencral Hiri.tr, of tho Army of the United
St.ttCM, it now oil a visit to the City of Washington,
where ho arrived on Chrmt ma* l>ay.
Attempt* air now m.ik ng to eflrct a ?ett lenient of
? he il .pti'c ulnmt the Imnndnry I ne l-.etwnen the states
of Tennessee ami Kentucky. .Mr* lliimphttvs, la'r
J meinlicr of Conjfi est from 'tYnneM.ee, has lieen deputed
l.v the Governor of that nt.ite, a coinnii?iM>ncr for the
pnrpo?eto go to Kcntnrky.
Mr. P.nkney, (vivs tiie llilt.tnorc !":** riot of the 2tith
nil.) tin* not re* fjned ? * sc?t m <.'<ui(frCM, 04 li.nl I tern
?iiMiort"!. Cup'. .. d^cly, O'te irtiuft p per kta'Ci) .h I/.
l>r*ieeod to tlip Mt '.terrene <11, i> the M.iccdonan IV jf.ite
f'/iiwrWiV# J TiicwUy l.ni four of tht
i voting jrenUeinen who arc ii'ioiit proceed tig faim tit >
owrt 10 India, ;>* tnv.oniriM, d.veat.njf thetmclve* ??? |
t'i? common preju I.cch of the age, partook ?f (he lienr.
fit*, Mid were in 'lie mo?t vdeinn manner, initated .nto
'ic m>*ter e? of fi-ee mnnonry, in St Pe'.cr'n Isidgc .
'??it prtide-ilnl ?'ep, no will lw? of cs?ent al ?* .
v re, n t lie r 'n'orco'irne with tin- nat.omofcn' 1 whc!?*r
il'Jioufh tlirv nriy :?rt.oi|:it?? a Widely different dnlert*
? ?' e <nnoi f?tl to l?e understood, for mmonry i|ie.iki tin
<ime lungoa^e ull over the Iwhi'.-thle ^tilx;
VOe/ the conclu* on of t lie eerenion.ei, one of tlw
jfii'lcmen in le'inlf ol' !i niwdl u*wl the other thru* .?!.
Iie?-ed the l/vl;f? in u wry aHcctioTvili fcnd |iertt|M"it
.'weeli, in which lie cxpmweil tlie liffh citiifactmn the)
felt n their imtiat on, and acknowledged tlie rrroneoit*
?pinion* they had formerly cn'ertamed of the nature of
Prcc Masonry. .\'rwhwy[n>rt HtraUl
Commodore Decnlttr. nn?l Oovernnr Holme*
of the MinHiAsijipi territory, ore nmong the din*
tinxtii*h<wl victor*, at pivHcnt at the hc.iI of
overnment.
Otorftia Ititm. ? The rnpid pro#rcM of our
itate toward real independence, i? highly grati?
Uing. Alonjr with thenample of ftuuar*, we r?
rriveil a ffnw day* ainc? from (!ol. M'C'orinlck,
a Hoiall quantity of Kvm? of I"* own making,
it i* at t onic, h?* a Rood flavor and appear* to re
nothing hut ay;o to make it c?|unl to what
in tiHiiall y imported. It in calculated by the
\Vest*Indla planter^ that tl??* Hum and Moia*ftc?
which are coii*?*lcr??il the oflal of thft crop, will
rrtv all e?p<wicc*of the plantation, leaving the
u*ar ndiftrofit-*? <Jeo. Journal.
rM9M TflS TINJM.
The committee who hud the honor of being
appointed by the citi/.ens of this place, to pre*
sent a Hwiml to Lieut. Tiiomas IIoldvp, of
the Navy of t!ie United 8tate*? an an exnres
Hion of their approbation, of hi* conduct on
Luke Krio, inform their fellow-citizen* that
thev have discharged the duty antdgnml them }
and submit to their perusal, *tho Letter which
accompanied the present, together with Lieu
tenant IIoloupN answer.
Charlctltit, AVr. 16.
Sir? Your fellow citizens of Charleston view
ing with marked approbation, your zeal in the
service of your country $ your patriotism and
manly conduct, which lifts been so particularly
distinguished, at to merit the friendship and oh
l*our brother officer*, and your fellow
jnieperal ly | and justly appreciating the
^Ejrou took in tho memorable battle of
JHmgMfcr, 1816, on Lake Erie, un
<TeFlltBt?|Hi a??l generous hero, Commodore
l*erryf atw aif'i public testimony ofthe great
respect they entertain for your character and
service*, WHju'eat your acceptance of a 8word.
In performing the itgreeable duty assigned us,
in presenting yort, in the name <?f your fellow
citizens with this Sword, be assured we f?cl
great pleasure, from a consciousness of your
talents, integrity, and bravery as un officer und
your worth as a citizen.'
Our best wishes attend you, wherever your
Country may call you i ana we beg you to ac
cept the assutances of our high esteem*
With great consideration we are, &c.
I) A N I I'.I, STKVENS,
THOMAS LER,
w WM. JOHNSON, jun.
? iohn rot*r??.
17. S. Frigate Jitvrt, A*. Tor**, JWr. 2C. 1815.
I Qtntiemeu ? Your Nattering letter of the l6t|l c
inst. conveying o Sword, voted me ;iby my feWig
low-citizens of t Charleston, I have the lionoj&l
of acknowledging the receipt of. Such a dfof|>
tinguished mark of their- approbation for any
service* I might have rendered my country, v|l|&
ever l>e recollected with the lUost lively feeling? V
of gratitude ; and in the course 0f my uro.f&|
sional duties, 1 hope 1 shall evince how highly I
appreciate this token of their esteem. (
Vor the handsome manner in which yon hflVe
made known to me their sentiments, I ueg your
acceptance of my warmest thanks.
\> ith the highest respect, &c..
THOMAS IIOI.DUr.
rOMMHIHIAL.
Prices Ciirrrnt, Churtftt'M, Jan. 9. ? Cotton (8.1.) 45
rent* i 1'p1 .ml Cotton, 25 ienu? j lt.cc, new, pr :ne,
W 50 75 cciiIh tir .k, n demand s 2d tpi.ltv.
Il.ee, R3 t> ft;} 25 cent* i Flour, (|?|? I.) Mi|>e> fnivt R8
5') u ftOt tkiuntry Flour, ft8 50. :? R'j ? Corn, HO .. 85
ctnii j Toharrrt, pr mc, ftll .. ft 12 ? Hujpir, Mu?cova?
do, prime, ftl6 * ftl8j Brown ll.wnnna 8ity.?r, ftlO
a ftl7 ? Wli U* llHV?nnali 8titfur, ft23 ? Green Colli-c,
ii- tne, 25 i OH Ooirec, 24 1 Course Lvevpool S.dt,
R4 70 ; F ne ft* 60 1 8t. Ul>ei, none j Iron, assorted,
85 50 ft ftO.
Hf'!F? ? Oi' priinenual.'v is in demand.
COTTON? aeWiUlBwl it <lull ? sale* of Upland arc
icfl'efcsl t pr.ee quoted.
SIICAIl it on the ri?e, owinjr to t?ie jrrowSnfc scarcity
? /!o<Tec continue* mntonary, a* well ;i? Knm? Mol:.,,?.ci
!:?h il'.prc??ed con?.dcrul)ly, 6J cents i* outumcd w.tlt
d.fHrnii t .
DRY (JOODS? Pr<c?< rein?.;n stationary ow n|j io the
??xt;enie low pr cc# of H.'.tidi Good*, ?oinc paixeli lute
Im-iti rt'.ili pjicd totl^? iS?rtliW:inl t and lit yj ckuj/e -.sic*,
*|Hvulati?r* liavo fxim'tit up to hold i.ver 'or iw -icxl
seuvm. Fiencli (iwrli Will ..vi-rajfe hlxnit 30 a .11 ?-cntrt
franc ? German Goods arc scurrc, witlt tl;e excep
tion of tlie ?-.i.irvcr kind.
I'O'ri'ON NAGGING ? The advanced stott of tho
sen .on ?>?'????.?? I ut little tint 'i?l
M\I.T ? llai declined viicc la>t week, ami *alci very
heavy.
I>1 Kit,
In th ? |>luri\ a few day* Mr Peter 1?. TVmt't.
I 'v.\, ii lite fui l? -r. nil. . . ?. Dr
Rknuhix H'in'ii R\n-r?i , P. iff v>r oi 'l.r Tiics. y and
Pr.iCt if c o' Mc<l ?? no, n:l ?? ' Xainral ll.ajoiy and llo
tonv, n> 'lie l'i?. vcr* ly ?n IVv?y|v;?n a.
.111 ? 1 1111 1 111
TO COIUIKSPOMlKNTS.
Tlie little p'K'in coiiiiihiii c .tad l?y "nu-iu," h wt
cJ w.tli |)lou-.'iio, mid w II Ik; read UMli deep nrv?t.
I do not icnr tlir nrciinul on ol p irl.ality wl.cn I -ay 1
'i 11k 1 mer ti coin|><ir mm w tli the ri-fchp. tod Monody
>f ls?rd l.yttlc'on, and tin- '?oiulh udm red reive* ?>i Mu?
ton on 4 111. 1 <r urc.Hions. The decp*toncd feci nj( v.li cli
ntninuin culCt is thrill. n^f <?cii<c?t .out tocver) tllticnfo'ir
'? moiiik, U rciiihikaMe n them all ? but it tliit poem it it
mo*t ron>picnon< ami cflitl.vo.
\V?i rn?.wN "Ode to Mclunrliuly," s r t ee. vtd cmd -dial 1
apj*. T.
HALK8 AT AU' hoNT
WIU. cotnmciirc, on TucmImv morn hi? '*#*'. (O h
n?t.) at 10 o'riurk, at t|ie Htniv l)n ?f
liifrnN luif ir? ili'ncc, ilia ^iilo ??!' ilirwcn l>alr- ,?nd
packaifct ??' MKItnilANIIlSK ? ron?.*t ng of tl? |t?|.
low .ifticlei ?? Ilrmvn, (iici-n, Hrnrlci, fllnr, l.ti?d find
llUi-k Ifftmbaxetu*. ? lldii, lei/. nc? t>n?l 8h:dlc.oi>?, wl/to
Vpj?.?fCiotl?, Miir Korrc/ii Clotli, common and Mt|>crfir?
CIoiIih iM-rcn, <*?-4 Co?tinpf-, clojrant VeMeoxt.
n(C>, f>-4 .'.ml .1*4 I) in u.Juror.et Cambric, Cambric Mo*,
i ii, lln rCord Mui(i<i, Hook Mu-dn, wb.tc
I AU>n II. mlkrrctliCf*! (*>mmon niiii fii'l- M.?ddir?*?
'o. common and >?%i{h.'i Hite Mallabai- do. Cotton I), ndun
i do. fl.lk lltnibmu do. H Ik Phffft do. I>l.irk ll.trcclo
>i.i tin. sofMM-flnr Ciiifthum*, II i.o do. ?ii|M>i-tinc and com
mon Calir?toi, elr^tnt Kilk HlnuvU, <<b-<fnnt H Ik ll.jid.
itrvcli .*'??, Oitioit lin tution ll.ifulkmli et's Ilcd, Wh 'c.
Yellow Flannels C ?!o>cd Thread*, Stork ncto, Itoilui
Cords nli?rk Crape, K Ik Hto<rk ntfi, l.tiu-n* mul I .awn*.
Mock Turtle (Jomb?, Kd mul lienor <?love?, (j.p ana
\prnn Tupei, Ni'ifro Stock njfi, Cotton l^tcs,
md llr.dle*. Thewbole to be anlil n lot* to an>t |?tir?
.It^erv Condition*? All itim* under ft .50, cn?hi over
?hut mho, approved endorsed paper at ii not y <U?y? will
l?c t ikcn. Mtvcbciitalilo Cotton. rece.ved t.\ 03 ceota.
C.bvbl , .1 tii 5
JOH Pill NT! NO. " m
T'IP. " Tli? ToW?p<?,4* U fHrn' *1i?! *'iiL /
inairr #U ?? w <*f ?i?nwu*l >**/ .
Hooks f?4tnphl?1*? il1<ANKH, (,|tl ?MySfcPi^l
\2lV*L9? ftl*?*1- ' ?",orM for ?
TUB RTA(iK^,m<;Rf?r?|| ,h? Staijr, that
Columbia .. k?|tt ?i lira ?? Culumliiii fiottl "
?I..,. 1 <????>* 1