University of South Carolina Libraries
g?????I I ( Concluded from second page.) Under these circumstances, the present Administration was called on, within the first week of its official existence, to decide what course was due to the national honor in this new attitude of things.? They could not but admit that, by the principles of public law, as recognized and sanctioned by tbe usages of all civilized nations, persons engaged in military or naval enterprises, under the orders of their lawful 'superiors, could not he held individually responsible for what was done in the execution of those enterprises.? McLeod, however, was in the hands of # the judicial tribunals of the country, and by regular judicial process only could he be discharged. The Executive authori. ty had no right to interpose its arm for his release. What, thee, was the an. swer <>f the Admimstr ition to the communication of the British Government? It was such as Jir. R. believed the Senate | would feel to be in accordance with the honest national pride of every American bosom. It was, in substance, this, for he had not the answer of the Secretarv of State then before him: You (the British Government) now avow the destruction of the Caroline as a public act of military and/naval force, done tin- j der your authority. Henceforward Mc-j Ltfod and others, who acted under your orders, must stand excused in the eye of the law. Let the courts, in the exercise i of the jurisdiction which of right belong. to them, allow his plea of immunity and discharge ; but we hold you responsib'e it his place, through all those modes of international redress which the code of na tions has provided for the prosecution o, vindication of national rights. " The - * * i *m n American P.opJe," (and here, said Mr. K I use, in part, the very words of the an *wer returned by the Secretary of State,) *' not distrustful of their ability to redres.* public wrong*by public means," is incapable of the poor revenge of pursuing at individual for a national offence, in which he was but the instrument of bis Govern ment. Mr. Rives appealed to the Senate??to the sentiment of American pride?to that Roman spirit, which he believed yet survived in the bosoms of his countrymen, to j say whether such a reply was not worthy o* | the country and the Government? Parcere subjectis ct debellare superbos" was the; dictate of a lofty and magnanimous spirit, whether in individuals or in States? Historians have recorded the conduct of Roman Senate on t e occasion of their ambassador being killed by the subjects of Demetrius one of the most powerful prince* of antiquity. Demetrius delivered the perpetrators of the act to the Romans; but the Senate suspecting that he had connived at or encouraged the crime immediately sent hack the individual offencers, notifying Demetrius that they would hold the sovereign, and not the subject, responsible. Is it in following the example of the proud Republic that the honorable Senator trom Pensvlvania nncis a ground tor imputing to the Admin stration, in the case of iVlcLeod, a want of proper national tone and spirit? But the Senator tells us, also, that he dissents entirely from the views of the administration in regard to the principle of international law involved in the correspondence b tween Mr. Fox and the Secretary of State. What is the principal thus denied ? I cite it, as the honorable Senator did, from the letter of instruction of the Attorney Genaral. It is there laid down in the follewing words; There is, therefore, now on authentic declaration that the attack on the Caroline was an aet of pnhlic force, done by military men, under the orders their superior officers, and is recognized as such by the Queen's Government." That an individual forming part of a public force, and acting under the authority of his Gov. erument, is not to oe held answerable as a private tresspasser or malefactor, is a . principle of public law sanctioned by (he usages of all civilized nations, and which the Government of the United States has .00 inclination to dispute." The Senator from Pennsylvania contends that this doctrine is applicable only to a state of open,forma I, and declared war. In this I beg leave to ditfer from him.? It is applicable to every case of a military aggression committed by military men, acting in obedience to their superior authorities, whether it be in a state of general and formal war or not. What is the reason of the thing? Let us not stick in the letter, but look to the considerations on which the rule is founded. Why are soldiers and military men not held individually responsible for acts of violence and trespass committed in military operations, on the persons and properly of citizens of another nation? Because in these acts they are the mce instruments of a higher Power, bound impera. * ?. ^ -:_u .1 lively Oy their allegiance 10 view mm services at the call of the constituted authorities of their country* and to obey implicitly the orders of their commune- t ing officers. It is not for the soldier or the volunteer (for they both stand on the same ground) to inquire into the justice i or legality of the orders he receives.? His duty is obedience, while the responsibilitv for his orders is with his sovereign, or his superior officers who issue them. And here I beg leave to refer the honorable Senator to his favorite authority, (Vatte!,) from which he read an extract which I shall presently ahow completely sustains, when proper y understood, the position he used it to assail. The passage [ am about to read refers to the -ease fa jrantV/i anfl. unjust war, of so a I I a character as to expose the sovereign i who wages it to the unanimous reproba- t tion of the whole family of nations. The ' author there says: "But, as to the reparation of any dam- ( age, are the military, the general officers ( and soldiers, obliged in conscience tore- ( pair the injuries which they have done, not of their own will, but as instruments ^ in the hands of their sovereign?" "Itis'j the duty of subjects to suppose" the orders ( of the sovereign "just and wise, <fcc ? i When, therefore, they have lent their assistance in a war which is afterwards < found to be unjust, the sovereign alone is i guiltv. He alone is bound to repair the I injuries. The subjects, and in particular the military, are innocent; they have act. ( ed only from a necessary obedience."? "Government would be impracticable, if I every one of its instruments were to weigh ' its commands," &c.?Vattel, b. iii. c. 11, j sec. 178. , In this passage both the rule and the i reason of it respecting the immunity from individual responsibility of persons em- j .Jn.rc.si in militnrv nnernfions. are laid piUVUK III I^IIMIM.J -- f down in the most comprehensive terms, j j They are regarded as mere instruments in j ( the hands of the sovereign or superior j authorities; as much so in effect, as the f bayonets they play or the cannon they discharge. The rule, too, is expressed in ( 'erms so large and comprehensive as to j apply to every kind of war, in regard to ?s character for justice; and to every j degree of war, in respect to formality, do. ( ration, and extent.' There are many Sorms and varieties of the state of war.? | n general, a declaration of war is requir- | d, to constitute a solemn or formal war. ( Jut "defensive war requires no declant. ( ion, not even, cn urgent occasions, an i ' xpress order from the sovereign." [YTat. |, el, b. iii, c. 4, sec. 68 ] So as to repris. 1 Is, and other specific and partial acts of i, !futility. They are not accompanied ! vith a declaration of war, and yet they are ] , aiblic wars, though of the imperfect sort. I flrttherforth, an able writer on the law of i j nature and of nations, has well described ' fhese various degrees and denominations of war. He says: I "If one nation seizes the goods of ano- ] ther nation bv force, upon account of some j damage, &c. such contentions by force ( are reprisals. There may he likewise oth- < er acts of hostility between two nations which do not properly come under the j name of reprisals, such as the beseiging i each other's towns, or the sinking of each other's fleets, whilst the nations in other i respects are at peace with one another. | These are public wars, because nations are i the contending parties. But as they are confined to some particular objects, they < imnorfppt ?nrl." (tp..?R, jj. C. 9. 1 ait '/I lliv ivv? ?- - - 9 -w s. 10. Of these informal and imperfect wars, I neither accompanied with a declaration of i war, nor extending into general and continued hostilities, the examples in modern i times are very numerous. Not to speak < of the memorable attack on Copenhagen, | we have had, in our own day, repeated instances of these local, partial, and isola- | ted hostilities, amounting, nevertheless, during their continuance, to a state of ' war, and carrying with them ail the legal consequence of that state. One instance < was too freah in his recollection. Mr. R. i said, having occured during the peri >d of his residence in France, and furnished < too apt an illustration of the principles i under discussion, not to justify a passing 1 notice. While the tyrant Don Migeul was on the throne of Portugal, he prac- ! ti.sed the grossest atrocities, not only on i his own subjects but on foreigners resident ' in his kingdom. The subjects of France i came in for a large share of these injuries I and indignities. Failing to obtain suit- I able reparation for them bv negotiation, I France resorted first to reprisals on the i Portuguese flag; but these, too, failing of 1 their desired effect, she despatched a I squadron under Admiral Roussin, which I forced theentraneeoftheTagus, and, pass- ! ing through the fire of the fortresses which j line its banks, anchored within gun shot I of the Itoval Palace. The required concessions were speedily yielded to this vigorous display of force, and Admiral | Roussin returned in a few days to Brest, < with the whole Portuguese fleet in nis i train, as the trophy of his sudden and sue- i cessful coup-de-main. Here was no \ formal or declared war. It was an isola- ' ted act of force. And yet will any one i contend that if a sailor of Admiral Rous- I sin hpd been afterwards found in Portu- I gal, he could have been made personally i answerable for the loss of life or destruc- ' lion of property which may haventtended I the operation in which he bore a part? i But Mr. R. said he would hasten to pre- I sent the Senate a most respectable an- ' thority on the laws of nations, which is di- ( rect and explicit to the point in question. Before doing so. he would merely premise that the legal effects attributed by puhli. < cits to a state of war related, first, to the I impunity of individuals for any injury In person or property they might commit in i the execution of military operations, and, < secondly, to the right of property acquired j' in goods taken by one belligerent from ?! another. The passages he was about to I read from Rutherforth would show that i both of these consequences applied as we 1 I to imperfect and informal wars, to re- < prisals, and to isolated acts of hostility, as ; to wars of the more formal and solemn ? kind. First, he says: < 44 The external lawfulness of what is ' done in a war, in respect of the mem- < bers of a civil society extends to public ' wars ot the imperfect sort, to a/>ts of re- < prisals. or to other acts of hostility," dec. * Rutherforth, b. ii. c. 9, s. 15. d 4 And again he says: J "Neither the reason of the thing nor i the common practice of nations will give 1 them any other impunity, or allow them < any otherwise to obtain property in what I 4 s taken where war has been declared, han in the less solemn kinds of war, vhich are made without a previous decaration." &c. "In the less solemn kinds )f war, what the members do, who act un. 3er the particular direction and authority )f their nation, is by the law of nations ?o pcrson;il crime in them; they cannot, :herefore, be punished consistently with his law for any act in which it considers hem only as the instruments, and the naion as the agent."?ldcmy b. ii, c. 9, s. 18. Mr. R. said ho would put one more case, and only one more, in order to bring * nore immediately home to the Senate the principle we have been discussing. He referred to the attack upon the frigate Chesepeake. It occured in a time of profound peace, on the bosom of one of our jreat estauries, and within the jurisdiction >f his own native Commonwealth. Would Tentlemen have held the sailors and ma-1 ines of the Leopard personally amenable j to our laws, and avenged the national in.! suit upon them? I presume not. [Mr. Benton, speaking across: I would have hanged every one of them.] - ... ti The Senator from Missouri, we an know, said Mr. R loves a summary mode ?f proceeding; hut would such an act lave been recognised hy civilized nations, ind approved by the general sense of mankind? For the sake of rescuing the conflicts of war Frc m the cruelties and bitterness of personal revenge, theprinci)!e of individual immunity has been es. ablished bv the cod? of nations; and I rather think that the Senator himself, upon reflection would have pursued a nobler course.. He would have obeyed the suggestions of a loftier chivalry, and directed his demands for redress to the offending sovereign, and not have wreaked his vengeance upon an involuntary instrument and an unresisting victim. Mr. R. said he would now proceed to show that the passage read hy tfie Senator j from Pennsylvania from Vattel and on which he so confidently relied to assail I 'd overthrow the position assumed by the Administration in relationto the principle of public law involved in the case of) McLeod, was. in truth an authority directly and expressly sustaining that position. Let us again read the passage which the jentleman cited from that auther, b. ii, c. I.g. 74 and 75. It consists of two secdons. The first is in the following words: "But if a nation or its chief approves ind ratifies the act of the individual, it then becomes a public concern; and the injured party is to consider the nation as the real author of the injury, of which the citizen was, perhaps, only the instrument." Now this describes identically the case sf McLeod, in reference to the burning 1 nf (hit Pnrnlinf*. That nun ucsi uliiwii v| art has been approved and ratified by the British Government, and, consequently in the words of Vattel, it "then becomes a public question" between nation and na. tion, in which the Government of the individual is the real and only responsible party. But the honorable Senator passed lightly over (his section, and dwelt with particular emphasis on the 75th section, which immediately follows, and is in these words: "If the offended State has in her pow. er the individual who has done the injury, she may, without scruple, bring him to justice and punish him. If he has escaped and returned to his own country, ihe ought to apply to his Sovereign to | fiave justice done in the case." The Senator from Pennsylvania read ! this section as if it applied to the same case supposed in the preceding section, to wit, wherp the act has been approved and ratified by the Sovereign. But it is per-1 fectly evident from the last sentence of i r U I the section that it ooes not; ior n wouia jo idle and absurd to apply to a Sovereign to have justice done upon his subject, when he had already ratified nnd approved the act of that subject. This section, therefore, must necessarily contemplate the case where the act of a foreign sub. ject has not been approved and ratified by his Sovereign, and affirms the principle that, in such case, the offended State may, by virtue of her jurisdiction over all persons within her territory, punish the offending individual, though a foreigner, if she have him in her power. It does not contradict in any degree, the principle laid down in the preceding section, that where the act has been approved and ratified by the Sovereign, he is responsible for the injury, and the individual is to be regarded only as the instrument. It is in universal rule of interpretation that, where there is an apparent conflict between parts of the same authority or law, ?uch construction shall he made, if possitile, as will give efTect to both. The obvious explanation given above of these two ?r>r?tinns nf Vatfel satisfies this rule, as well as the plain import of the text. The Senator from Pennsylvania put a case which he seemed to suppose would fa'rly test the principle of international law involved in this discussion. He asked if Col. McNnb 9hou!d, under the rders of the Colonial authorities in Canida, seize and rob the mail of the United States, could he set up his orders as a >ar to a prosecution for such an offence n the American courts? Tlio case put ins not the remotest analogy to the case if McLeod. Such a proceeding would be i common felony, incapable of being - ? ?i - - - c?:i!i _ i sheltered under any piea 01 iijuiutry one. iience. The duty of a military man can never lay him under the obligation of be. coming a highway robber. The capture and destruction of the Caroline, on the jther hand, however justifiable upon any wwud application of the principles of in:ernational law, is shown by all the correspondence and documents relating to t to have been a military and naval oper. ifiori, governed by all the rules and dis. jiplioe of military service and subordina. don. UMBRELLA; A Cotton umbrella with a hooked handle was mi* aid somewhere in town a we> k or two since. If the finder would bo good enough te leave it at the bookstore, the owner would receiv I it. "REV. RICHARD FURMAN ^ SERMON, DELIVERED in the Baptist Church in this place in vindicatian of the doctrine and j practice of the Baptis*. denomination, for sale at tho store of A. P. LACOSTB. | " SPORTSMANS POWDER^ ONE Case English Canister Rifle Powder, manufactured by "Pigous &, Wilks," Lon. I don, tor sale by the Canister. D. MALLOY. May 28, 1841. 29 tf CHINA CROCKERY AND GLASS WARE. THE Subscriber has on hand a good asrort. ment of the above, comprising a variety of patterns. For sale cheap D. MALLOY. May 31, 1841. 29 tf CANDLES A few Boxes Ta low and Sperm Candles for 6&le by D. MALLOY. May 31,1841. 29 tf CHEESE. FOR SALE BY A. P. LACOSTE. Octobrr 21, 1840. G1 EN. JAMES \V. CANTEY, (the presen I" incumbent) is respectfully noniinuied to tiie'tcxl Legis'ature as a conipetnl aud suitable candidate for tho offices of Adjutant and Inspector General. MANY OFFICERS. I Cheraw, Juno 2,1841. tf WOES, AC. ? MADEIRA, London D B Stout, Old Port, Philadelphia Porter | Pale Sherry, Pule Scotch Ale, | Golden " Cream 44 , Chataue Margeaux, L"mon Syrup, | Chat me La Rose, Orgeat 44 Muscatolle, Co-weberry 44 Champagne, Stn wherry 14 Togother with a superior assortment of Liquors and Cordials, for sale by EMANUEL & SOLOMONS. | June 15, 1841, 31 tf I WUITJE WOE VINEGAB Cider do For sale by AUG. P. L.COSTE Juno 7 1811 3d Punlap & Marshall EARNESTLY request all persons indebted tothemtomake an eafly aettleinent ofthci. accounts. They will invariably add theiiterest however trifling the amount on ill j accounts not paid within ten days. January 1st 1840. 8ff For sale at the Bookstore. ASERON bv the Rev. J. C. Coit, deliv. livered in the Presbyterian Church in Che. raw. 4,upon the occasion of the Se ni.ceiitenarv celebration; prepared for the press, and published by the author, as a testimony against the ostab. lished religion in the United Slates " Price *2 cents. August 4th, 810. 28?tf flour. A GOOD supply of fresh Ground superfinr flour in srorc and for sal. cheap, by D. MALLOY. June 14, 1841. 31?tf 1 ? new sijitf.tier goods! Just received bv Steam Bo.it Swin by D. B. JfcARN. ' June 26th 1841 tf cash system coiltlwed. THE TIMES are such as to compel the Subscriber to ccnthue the Cash System; Groceries and all articles in that line will be sold for Cath. only. Persons whose accts. and notes still remain unpaid, will please un. derstand that no new credits will be given until all old arreareges are settled in full. D. MALLOV. Cheraw January 4th 1841. . , 8 , tf. oiy consignment. GALS. North Carolina Whi?key fJVfFwarrantcd good proof, and to be 5 or 6 yenra old. It will be sold by the Cask on lib* ral terms to an approved purchaser. BROWN BRYAN & BROTHER. JtmalB, 18-J1 31?4t notice. THE Subscriber intends forwarding his order for Garden 8ced to Boston early in August, he intends ordering t '.he different vur.elics of the Field Grasses provided persons who are disposed to make the experiment of planting Clover, Luerrne. Ac. Ac., will hand | in their orders in time, specifying the quantity wanted Ac. Ho has now on hand Rutabaga and Flat Dutch Turnip seed for Fall plunting, warranted good. CHARLES VANDERFORD. Chersw June 23,1841 32 3t a Tist of letters REMAINING in the Post Office at Cheraw July 1, 1841, which if not called for before 1st October next will be sent to the Gwneral Pw?8t Office as Dead Letters. B?Bartctt Emma Poleen, Bryant William S. Brown R. W. Bragnw Is.iac C. ? /*? \M /ai__L A 1_ ! 1 IJ C ? Campbell ,?|iea v. 1*1. Claris /irciiHimu, Cowden Warren A. 9. Clisucey D. VV. Chapman Mrs. Mary J. Campbell Miss Katharine ! t ampbcM. D?Dodd Ransom Drako Lemuel S. Derrick | D. I E?Evans M. F. T. Edwards John E. F?Fisher Mary. G?Gallagher James J. Gronthom Henry Groves David Goodwin Harry Grisan John C. G<k1 bold Cade. H?Husbands r?ewi* D. 2 Harkness John HarrelJuines 4 Husbands Rachel Husbands J. D. Johnson Eli Jarrot John M, K?King George Keith Daniel 2 Kelly James G. M?McLauchlin Daniel McNahb Duncan Maihium M. McKay Laucbiin McKay John A. McDonald MurdockJ. McAlpiii Malcom Mun. roe Isabella K. McCall Duncan McQuageJohn McMillan John McC&skill John B. P?Pervis John Poore William Pired James ? ? .?? n Powe t. A. rogues vr ra, seu. rowei? vjr?u? , H. PosHI J. C. R?Rivers Lewis Rakestraw Isaae. S?Smith John M. 2. Smith Carolina E* Smith Msry Smith H. H. Smith Char'otte M. Smith John Smith Murtha Sweat Wm. Sweat Jessee Strotber Mary C. Soott Nancy Stafford Malcom T?Thomas Riee 3, Turner Margaret Turn, age Wm, 2. V? Vmderford C W?Wallace C. D. William* Tedford Webb Harriet Witer Miss M. Williams H H Warren Joseph. Winn Msrthn, Wallace Jackson, Wnjd Jane, Watters Harriet 2 Williams Jesse iiMMMypeii | HEAD QUARTERS. CLARENDON, June 4, 1941. Ordtrs No. ? I The following Regiments will parade for '' review and drill at the limns and places herein f stated, viz: C The 25th Regiment at Winnsborough, on a Tuesday the 13th day of July next. r The 24th Regiment at the usual parade ground on Thursday, the 15th of July. The 25lh Regiment at Chealerville, on Tues. day. the 20th of Ju y. J The 27th Regiment at Oliver's Old Field, on ^ Thursday, the <2d of July. j Tho 46ih Regiment at Ebenezer, on Saturday the 24th o July. 1 The 34th Regiment at Yorkville, on Tuesday, '' the 27th of July. * The 35th Regiment at Union Court House, on Thursday, the 29th of July. The 9th Regimen/ of Cavalry a* McPrideville on Saturday, 31st of July. The 37th Regiment at Wilkin's Old Field, on Wednesday, the 4th of August u The 36th Regiment at Tiinmon's Old Field, ^ on Tuesday, the 10th of August. , c The 45th Regiment at the Burnt Factory, on Thursday, the 12th of August. The 41st Regiment at Park's Old Fieid, on SaMirday, the 14th of August. k The 40th Regiment at Mrs. Boyd's, on Tues- ? day. the 17th of August. j. The 10th Regiment of Ca> airy at Boyd's on Thursday, the 19th ef August, i The 3rd Regiment ; t Toney's O'd Sfnfp. on The 1st Regiment of Cavalry a* Pickcnsville, on Saturday, the 28th of August. The 5th R'-girrHmt at Hunter's on Tuesday, the i 31st of August. ! The 2nd Regiment at Hall's, on Friday, the 3d 8 of September The 42d R gim-mt at Miuton's, on Tuesday, the 7ih of September. The 4th Regiment at Vcrrennes, on Thursday I the 9th of September. I The 8th R- gim nl at Morrow's Old Field, on 4 l Tuesday, the I4th of Sentembrr. Tlie 6th Regiment at Loiiiux'* on Thurdny, the 16ih of Scpteml pr. The 2nd R'giment of Cavalry at Longmire's, | on Saturday, the 18th of September. f The 9'h Regiment at Lowe's, on Tuesday the 2Lt of September. The 7th Rog'ment at the Old Wells, on Thursday, the 23rd of September. Thelllth Regiment at Richurdton's, on Satur. div. the 25th of September. The 3Sth Regiment at Killer'# Old Field, on Tuesday, the 28th of Soptembor. The 39th Regiment at the u?ual parade ground, on Thursday, tha 30th of September. | The commissioned and n'?n.eommi?sioned s I efficors will assemble at their Regimental Mus- | ' ter grounds, for drill and instruction on the day previous to their review. Major Generals and Br-g-Mlier Generals will, wi'h their staff, attend the reviews in their re- n spectiv commands. The Brigadier Generals are specially charged ??it'll the extension of so much of this order as ( relates to their own R-igades. The Commandants ?f R'Trimenls will make their annual returns to their Brigadier Generals ?t such tiinps as they may direct, to eneble them to make their Mums to the Adjutant G'eneral by 3 the fifleontli of 'ctoher next By order of the Commander-in-Chief. JAMES W. GANTRY, < Adjutant and Inspector Central. 4 June 16, 1941. [C] 0t. CONSUMPTION Sc LITER COMPLAINT. DR. TAYLOR'S . BALSAM OF LIVERWORT. ' n AS been used successfully for eight veafs in the cure of these dise;oe<. Rmneiuber! the original and genuine is rnude on"y at 375 Bowery, New York; all others are spurious and unauthorized ! Consumption and Liver Complaint! As a general remdey for th"?e diseases, 1 am . fully sa'iKfiad from Baisum oi i,iverwo't. lining purely vegetable it can bo used with the utmost safety by al1 person* it. every condition. It cleinsos the lungs by expectoration, ro'iavcs 1 difficult breathing, and seems to heal the chest. Tlicre can he no question, but this medicine is a | cortain cure for chronic coughs and colds. I have used it for four years in my practice, and always | with success. A. F. ROG ERS, M. D. Consumption! The following remarks were taken from the last number of the .Medical .Magazine: 'The surprising effect produced hy Dr. Taylors Balsam of Liverwort, in consumptive cases, cannot fail exciting a deep and thrilling interest < throughout the world.. We have so long believed \ this di*eaao (consumption] incu ablo, that it is | difficult to credit our senses when we see persons j evidently consumptive, restored to health. Yet j | th s is a fact of daily occurrence; how then can ' we question the virtue of the ahove medicine ? p j In our next wo shall be more explicit: meantime we hope physicians will make trial of this medicine an t report its effect tons." Mote?The orginal and genuine Taylor's; Bnisom of Liverwort is made and sold at 375 Bowery. OBSERVE ! Buy only that which is made at . the old office, 375 Bowery, New York, and which is sold hy Dr. A. MALLOY, Chernw. S. C. c Handbills a,id certificates giving a history of j the inedicinet accompany each bottle. P .r ? HICKORV SPRUC " Situated in she County of Chatham \orth 1 Carolina, Eighteen miles Southwest Fittsborough so well known for its medical virtues, is j now in good repair, and the subscriber is rea~ j dy for the reception of Visiters. The propri- * etor thiuks it entirely unnecessary to add j words or.i certificates to recommend the < water as the many cures which it has perI formed will sufficiently recommend to ii.valeds, ! ' the virtue of the water in many diseases par- J i ticularly dyepepsie. TER1S OF BOARD. Ninety c-nta per clay; Fum dollars per j week; Children and servants hair price.? I I Horses fifty cents porday. Warm, cold, and | e I Shower baths. Prepared at the shortest p notice. WM. BURN. a June 30th, 1841. 38 3t. DRUGS, XEDICIXES, Chemicals, Patent Medicines, / Perfumery, Paints, Oils, Dye | Stuffs, &c. &c, for sale wholesale and retail by A. HOPTOX, CHERAW, S. C. At his Drug Store, next door to Brown Bryan Brother. Where muy be had at all times a general as sort mo t of articles in the Prug line?recom mend, d to he of superior quality which w ill be ' di?po?ed of on very moderate terms?Physicians and othors wishing pure medicines, may rely a 1 on being snpn'ied with them. r May 26, 1841. 28 a RECEIVING A1VD FORWARD- j I DG BUSINESS. I TIIK Subscriber continues the Receiving ( and Forwarding of Go??C8 nnd Produce, his j Wharf and Stoie are in good order, and the room, ample. His charges are no more than j those of other Houses in the the rime lino. BENJAMIN KING. Georgetown S. C. May 24, 1841. 29 ?f 1 LAW NOTICE. I " "AMES W. Blakeney, and Alexander # kw Gregg, having formed a Copartnership i the practice of the Law, under the name of ^ Makeney and Gregg, will attend the courts of /'bestertield, Darlington, Marion, Marlborough nd Lancaster. Office, Market Street, Che& w. December 28th 1840. \ tf A CARD. OIIN A. INGLIS, Attorney at Law Vill practice in tho Courts, of Law tor ths )istrict8 of Chesterfield, Marion* Darlington, nd Marlborough. His office is in the buildig next below the Store of Messrs. Taylor 6t> 'unch. Dec. 14 1840. For Sale. 4 TRACT on the Doctrine* of Election and Reprobation, by Rev. James H. Thorn well. Llso, a Vindication of the Protestant Doctrine oncerning Justification. May 1st, 1840. 25 tf The Subscriber has just received, and wil eep constantly on hand,Cotton Yarn and Twine t wholesale, from the Manufactory of Rocking, am. GEO. GOODRICH. Cheraw. Jan. 1640. 10 tf XNES. ~~ LACK. Dark Blue. Light Blue; Red and 13 Copying Inks, in small ?Brltlrs, For ale by J"hn Wrglit at the Chernw Booketore. October 30. 1840. 51 tf Hats and Shoes. 4 LARGE and well selected stock for sal by A. P. LACOSTE. October 21, 1840. DLXLAP & MARSHALL, I AVE just received among other desirable ancy goods, the following articles, viz;? SHAWLS. Super Black Hernani, &4 and 4 4, Handsome printed Mouselin l)e Laine from 8 ro6-4. Supr. Scarlet Merino 4-4 and 5 4. M Do. Mode (Plain) colored Thy bet, ^ Belvedere & Cabyle do. 6 4 and 84 GLOVES. A good assortment I.adiep and Gentlemen's uper colored and black H. S. Beaver and Juckskin. HOSE, Ladies super white and black Merino, Cash nere and Ingrain Cotton, MOUSKLIN DE LATXJSfl. Rich Printed, Fancy black ground and Mode Colors. ALSO, Super Blue and wool dyed black cloths, " 44 ? 44 u Cashmeres ind Safinotts , Tea and Loa Svgor. SUPERIOR articles, for family use, for sala ~ by A. P. LACOSTE. October 2, 1840. 40 , if Clothing. C1LOTI! and Blanket Overcoats, Cloaks, Itc f For sale very low, A. P. LACOSTE. October 21, 1840. , 9 Saddles and Leather. A GOOD Stock for sale low, by A. P. LACOSTE. October 21,1?40. ?EH AIV10 CHEAP GOODS. IHiiVejust iccfivfld a well selected assort, ment of staple and fancy Dry GoodsoftllO [intent style and fashion for the season. PJ. axe call aud examine my stock before lurclmsing. M. BUCHANAN. May 3l, 1841. 29 tf JUST reckivjed" ETHODIST Hymns i2ino. Lfl do do 24mo. sheep, calf, ^ and Morn. co. ^ dethodist Discipline lute edition, V.ttsons Dictionary, [.ife of Wesley, jife of Dr. C'ark, amily Bible, sheep and calf, AI'of which w ill he sold at the New York rices, JOHN WRIGHT. April 10, 1941. 22 tf Dunlap Sf Marshall HEREBY give notice that they will continue to sell their Dry Goods on I), on the usual rcdil to punctual customers. I hey will sell their Groceries at the lowest rices for cash only. The very short credit at which groceries can iow be bought, amounting with the exchange Imnst io Cash, with their limited capital compels hem to the adoption of thi?. Umbrellas JUSTreceived a good sst-orfment of Silk and Gingham* Umbrellas. DUNLAP & MARSHALL 3PKRM AND TALLOVVMCANDLES tlOR 8ale by 1 A. P. LACOSTP, October 21, 1840. * 49 it LADIES SHOES! DUtNLAP &. MARSHALL have just receiv. (d direct from thp Manufactory (Phila.) 460 air Ladies and Misses Kid ana Seal Slipped ind shoes. Lard. 2000LBS*LEAF LARD> r?r ** ^ A. P. LACOSTE. Septcml*r 30, 1840. State of South Carolina. DARLINGTON DISTRICT. In the Court or Common Pleas. of W. Hunter Sur'v. Dec. oo sealed 4 - Hunter & DuBose Note, in Foreign vs. " Attachment. ? n c nt.R/uui ** &/UA/vgv? ^ rHE Plaintiff in the above stated case having Hied his Declaration in my office this day nd the Defendant having neither wife nor Attorley within the limits of the said State upon who i copy of this attachment could he served. On motion ofG. W. & J. A. Dargan PlantifF's Attorneys. It is ordered that B. DuBose de ilead or demur to the same, within a year andat lay from the date hereof or final and absoluo udgment shall be awarded and given him. It is also ordered that a copy of rhis order bo lublishetl in the Farraers' Gazette ooce every three uonths for the space of a year and a day. S. WILDSDUBOSE.C.C.P. Clerks Office, Sept. 23, 1840. 46 1 ev 13 m