The Camden confederate. (Camden, S.C.) 1861-1865, May 01, 1863, Image 1

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

" ' % . % ^ , 4 . _ I)C (Eambcn Confederate VOLUME II CAMDEN, SOTCAT, FRIDAY, MAY 1, 1863. NUMBER 27 fi)( Cainbrn (Confckraif, AT THREE DOLLARS A YKAfl, PAYABLE INVARIABLY IIALF-YEARLV IN ADVANCE Terms for Advertising: For ono Square?fourteen lines or less?ONE DOLLAR ANI) TWENTY-FIVE CENTS for each insertion. Obituary .Notices, exceeding one Square, charged lo at advertising rates. Transient Advertisements and Job Wor* MUST BE PAID FOR IN ADVANCE. No deduction made, except to our regular advertising patrons, v .r. T. ITERSmtiA^^Editor. FRIDAY, MAY 1, 1863 " Slicei? for tlic manufacture or Cotion Curds. If our enterprising citizens who oro engaged in ranninrv f 1*a ? 1-' * w.u uiwuauu, wouiti import snooting used in the manufacture of cotton cards, they would confer n blessing, and one affecting the welfare of tho mass ol our people, infinitely beyond that received from all tho " assorted cargoes" yet arrived. Tstblcaux Vivaiil. Tho young ladies of Camden and vicinity proposo a soi ios of Tableaux this ovoning, for tho benefit of tho soldiers. Tho object is one that commends itself to evory mind?whilst the manner of celebrating the immemorial festival of May Day is such as befits our present circumstances. Conscripts. Tho following is a statement of the conscripts enrolled in Kershaw District, and tho disposition mado of them : Total number enrolled, 163 Exempt by law, 82 Accepted by Surgeon, 33 Rejected by Surgeon, 48 'Captain K. B. Cantey, the enrolling officer of tho District, has executed his task with fidelity to the gov erumcnt, and with urbanity and consideration towards thoso coming under his jurisdiction. Surgeon Dan* nelly, by bra polite quiet demeanor, his businoss-like v directness and perfect impartiality has well and ac* coptably performed his part of tho rather ungracious 1111 f r\(* />Anenr!r\tlA? MUVJ VI WliCVI tpvivii. ITCeri-iiiiae. " I am nothing, if not critical It is pleasant to turn for a moment from gazing at tho gigantic and thrilling drama of war?whoso stage extends from tho Chesapeake to the Rio Grande, whose curtain is the sulphurous smoko of battle, whose music is tho loud cannon and rattling musketry?to contemplate tho quiet and pleasant Held of iictiou; and to listen to the voico of criticism in elucidation of its mysteries, in praiso of its beauties, in rccommeni dation of its utility. It makes us long for tho days of peace, when the crabbed professors of strategy and international law and the learned doctors of taxation, tinanco and kindred thorny subjects, will descend from the critic's chair, and givo place to the sweet toned accents of tho accomplished Belles Lettres lecturer. A vwrceau of this now rare luxury?a rose in December? we are pleased to 4. ffer to our readers this week. Recommending it, however, on.account of its elementary character, not so much to the admirers of the Merchant of Venice as to our young friends, who contemplato an acquaintance with that much admired play. Wo could no where lay our hands upon so compendious a description of the central character in it?the celebrated Jew. For tho further information of any such tyro, we would state that it is the decided opinion of the most acute critics and learned commentators upon this author. that. Rhvloolr wno n rrn/titntf A ? w J .? V* vw?wr \Jb iimuuiu that he held the bond of his debtor?that he attempted to enforce his contract in a most unusual and unconscionable manner. And we would also stato to our young friends that it is not uncommon to denominate as Shylocks, those creditors (the term would bo inapplicable to other persons) who, for their own gratification (whether by the way of revenge, money-making or money saving) demand from their debtors tho performance of the very letter of their contract, even though such performance should involvo the cruel and unnecessary destruction of the debtor or ruin of tho State. "We would impress upon their minds that it is not so much tho fact that he was an "intense Hebrew"?a hater of pork?a broker, and rovengoful; it was not one nor all of these that raised him to the " bad imminence" of becoming a type of a certain classs of creditors. There are those who eat pork and v^ho follow other callings than that of the broker, who yet resemble him in their disposition to tako ad van tage of the very letter of the law, let the consequences be what they may, an^ who, though they demand not the "pound of flesh", require the specie to pay their debts, though every man is as unable to furnish it as poor Antonio to produce tho ducats he owed. By the way wo would rescue the reputation of the the stately and generous merchant from the imputation of being fast, (unless the term is applicable to every borrower of money for any purpose whatever) t > t v k which is a 44 confusion of persons and ideas essentially unlike," and which wo did not expect from tho acumen and discrimination of 14 Merritnac," whoso test of theso qualities (if thero is aoy forco in frequent quotation) must consist in distinguishing a "hawko from a liand-saw." And then as to tho oft-recurring 44 egg" illustration? 44 Then why is your man so pertinacious in trying to transfer his eggs to the account of his creditor, who lent him good eggs yonrs ago? "Why does ho stir up this 4 unseemly squabble' ? Can it bo because tie think* hii eggs are unsound and would liko -to get rid ol thom as sound ?" Let all men judge who first 6tirred up the squabble, and who first implied, by their conduct, unsoundness The payment of debts is and has been, according to the abundance or scarcity of money, moro or less of daily occurrence. Nor is this done nor has it been done always in specie or notes convertible into specie. Debts were paid in 1857-8 in the notes of suspended banks, and tho creditors wero g'ad to receive them, though such notes were not specie nor convertible into it. Why were creditors willing to recoivo what was 44 confessedly not money" in payment of a specie debt ? Beeauso they believed in tho ultimate solvency and good faith of tho Banks of this State, whose bills wero tendered them. Twelve month ago?six months ago, nay, as far as wo aro awaro to the contrary, up lo within a month ago this process of paying dobts in tho ordinary currency of the conntrv was un interruptedly carried on. The debtor glad to be able to paj', and the creditor willing to receivo Treasury Note?. But objections have lately been raised to the continuance of a practice, uninterrupted before, in the whole history of tho community, Viz: the practice of receiving tho ordinary currency of the country in payment of debts And it lies upon tho part of the objectors to assign sumo satisfactory reason for a proceeding so extraordinary. Their refusal to continue a course of conduct which had universally prevailed heretofore, raised the squabblo. The creditors commenced it. And as currency, both State and Confederate, which "confessedly is not money," has been received in payment of apecio debts until very recently, this novel and unlooked-for refusal is calculated to produce alarm and inflict injury. Why were tho bills of suspended banks received in payment of debts ? Because the solvency and good faith of these institutions .were implicitly believed in. Why are Treasury notes now refused? Is it not because "there is such a thing as repudiation of debts by individuals and governments ?such a thing a? scaling them?such a thing as rofusaltopay interost on them promptly?" We are forced to believe from the conductof "my man" that he has very serious doubts upon tho subject of Confederate ability and good faith in this regard. Wo deprecate tho wholo of this discussion. The idea of repudiat.on should no moro bo entertained and discussed, than tho idea of subjugation. Wo" know the latter never will bo our fate?why this uneasiness and restlessness in regard to tho other? Let Treasury Notes be received, as they have been up to this time. * CARD. Having heard various reports connecting us with tho manufacture and salo of sixteen barrels of whiskey, delivered in Columbia, about the 20th day of March last, said to be marked " Te>ebcbe Oil," and seized by tho Medical Purveyor, Dr. J. J. Chisholm, for tho Confederate States of America?wo have examined, by permission of Dr. J J. Chisholm, those barrels, and find nn snr>h mnrt mori-o *1,0..,-. Wo therefore beg suspension of public opinion until tho case is heard before the court. Wo shall, in proper time, substantiate to tho satisfaction of at least unprejudiced minds, that we have not and never did have any counection with any person or persons, directly or indirectly, in the manufacture or sale of whiskey. or in any other way. We therefore pronounce the abovo assertions false and malicious. HOCOTT & SUTHERLAND. Camden, April 25, 1863. SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND DISTRICT. Personally appeared Phineas P. Frazeo before me, and makes oath that the sixteen barrels of whiskey seized by Dr J. J Chisholm, Medical Purveyor for Confederate States of America, woro not marked or labelled " Terebene Oil," but appear to be what are known as cogniac brandy barrels. This deponent does not know D D. Hocott or J. F. Sutherland, either personally, directly or indirectly, or in anywise connected with tho solo or purchase of the said whiskey. PHINEAS F FRAZEE. Sworn to before me, this 22d April, 1863. A. G. BASKIN, C. C. C. P. & G. S. Lincoln's Late Visit to a hl ? ? - w m waom 19 rviii x 11 X IIO Richmond Examiner has learned, from good authority, that Lincoln's late visit to the Army of the Rappahannock was fur the purpose of inducing the soldiers whose terms of enlistment are about to expire, to re-enlist. Old Abe made speeches without number, and whisl^ flowed like water, untill .the wholo army got drunk; but for all that, the men would'nt re-enlist. In view of this state of affairs, the Examiner is hopeftil and jubilant exceedingly. [for tiik camden confederate.] Mr. Editor: However mal appiopoa your citation from Shakespeare, yet if it proves that you have taken to tho study of that {front author, in real earnest, I auger good to come of it. II you will read and inwardly digest tho thoughts of Shakespeare, he will toaoh you to observo the injunction I gave in the outset, e, to avoid confounding things, or persons, or ideas, essentially unlike; in fact he will teach you to distinguish 14 a hawke from a hand-saw." I am obliged to pronounce, that your proficiency, thus far, in studying tho " great deliueator" is not satisfactory. Shylock, you say, is a well-known prototype, and drawn by a master hand. Agreed, say I. But a prototype ol whom? That is a question that draws upon your powers ol discrimination, and "delineation," if you please. He is tho prototypo of nobody I have spoken of, or mean to speak of. Consider and read: Shylock represents an intense Hebrew?a genuino and implncnblo hater of such persons as you arc, Mr. Editor, (and I hope I am) that is, "a pork eating Christian,'' (though God knows tho pork, if not the Christian, is scarce enough now) Ho was an unsparing usurer?an enthusiastic admirer of tho morality current between Jacob and Laben, (somewhat like the jugglery of this happy day,) a sharp broker, who paced tho Hialto to calcli such ftist young men as Antonio and his cronies, tho owners of Argosies and hunters of Heiresses. lie received their sneers, their kicks and their ends, and becamo their sleepless aud revengeful enemy. Ho even joined them at supper, consented to smell their pork, " iu hate" (says he,) 41 to feed upon tho prodigal Christian." The fast young men were resolved on his ducats, aud for security, the celebrated " pound ot flesh" tvas pledged ot mortgaged. Shylock meant to humble the King of the Exchange, tho shipnabob of Veuice, (tho chief runner of the blockade for ought I know,) and ho demanded, from deliberate hate and roveuge generated by personal insults, reinforced by Theolocical odium !?? ?? ' u , vnu ucicuiutry una exaggerated resentment of his race, tho execution of his contract in its penal part, even in lieu of his ducats ; thus showing how strong is rovengo in such a character, even when in conflict with tho Ducat of Venice, or tho almighty dollar of our regions. Now, pleaso show where there is, in tho creditor T hnvo spoken of, a single characteristic that draws him into the likeness of Shylock?that standard which your Belles Lettres reading has supplied ? My man has not sought out tho fast young inen of tho Rialto?has no special or general hatred of the " pork-eutiug christian'?no revengo towards his debtor, theological, personal, national, or otherwise? domands neither ducat, dollar, nor pound of floph, not even a pound of his debtors ox or hog, tainted or fresh?demands nothing, "nominated in tho bond." or not nominated?demands not oven tho eggs, though ever so fresh or nddleu, which his Antonio has in tho common basket?nor is there any shrewd Daniel coino to judgment, to rendor to my man any right, or any ; redress whatsoever Have wo not a stop-law ? I wait for you to trnco tho likeness between your man, the corn and bacon seller, and that other cli.irnctor drawn by tho " master baud," I mean that Vcnitinn debtor, tho gentle and chivalric Antonio. It you cau show the relation of typo and prototype between them, then, I shall proceed to refrosh my views of tho " Merchant of Venico." Certainly there was a court open to Shylock, and it pretended to give him his strict right. Revenge led him to over-reach himself by an impracticable mortgage?and yet the court tried 10 pay a decent respect to tho terms of tho contract. (,)h! what a relief to the travail of that remarkable tribunal, if it could have known tho equality of Vouitian Treasury Notes, when to be paid by a debtor, .and only then, with ducats! . All our egys aro in the sumo basket, are they ? T think so?and I have a strong belief that they will not all be brokon. Then why is your man so pertinacious m trying to trnnsit-r his eggs to tiio account ol his creditor, who icnt him good eggs years ago? Why does he stir up this " unseem y squabble ?" Can it be because he thinks kis eggs are unsound, and would like to get rid of them as sound ? Why not take the venture of his etrca ermn.i j * ~ pl,^ v/i unsuuiiu, in mo uonlcderato basket? Why did he not lot his creditor have his eggs at a fair price when he knew they wero sound? W hy has your man such a fresh born zeal to pay his debt now? "Why was ho so torpid years ago? Here's the rub; answer; and answer from your conscience and knowledge; and not from,a very careless reading of Shakespeare. Your notion of Shylock leads you to sneer at tlio idea that attributes sacredness to the obligation of contracts; I mean fair contracts; contracts, made under no duress, and no circumvention, and therefore, requiring none of that ''special pleading," which you attribute to mo; though, 1 confess, I don't know what you mean by special pleading, as contradistinguished from any other pleading. You know I am no lawyer; and all I know about the science of ploading, as understood by lawyers, is what I have heard them say? to-wit: that it is a science based on the closest logic; an infallible means of sifting grains of wheat from bushels of chaff; a certain delineator of a precise proposition; and a total loo and exterminator of confusion of tdens. things or persons; that horrible sin of looso thinkers, writers, preachers and printers. But to return to tho idea that concerns the obligation of contracts, and Shylock's connection therowith: " Render unto Caesar tin* things that are C'tesars." t)id Shylock invent that injuueti n ? No State shall ...... d.ii - F?o0 juiu 01 uuainaer. ex post Jacto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts " Is that language invented by Shylock, or whose language is it? It' the ? corn and bacon seller, or if any debtor may violate the obligation of contracts, by omission or commission, j whenever he finds his gain in such violation, in ono j mode or the other, and skulk under the flag of patri- i otisro, or Shakespeare, or the Scriptures as a guiso ? j then we had botter remove tho above cited restraint j on State power, and allow tho Legislature td prescribe, i when, where, and by whom, that delightfully, moral, religions and patriotic exercise shall be indulged, viz: violation of the obligation of contracts by debtors, for their own advantage?to define who is Shylock, and how he shall be punished. If you be yet blind to the dinerenoe between " a hawke and a hand saw," between " a weazle and a whale," (pardon me for drawing an idea and a word from Shakespeare,) why then, I fear, I may be driven ' to a still higher authority than the Bard of Avon, and exclaim, " Ephrnim is given to his idols; let him alonei' But beforo pronouncing such a sentence, I invoke again solid, reasoning upon a real case, not windy declamation?-any sort of pleading, special, general or any othct sort, that shall eliminate the very truth, and not a vain or mischovious and delusive fiction. More anon. Mebkimac. [for the camden confederate.] Mr. Editor: I have not the remotest idea of becoming a party to the controversy now going on between yourself and your correspondent " Merrimac but there is a single remark made by your correspondent which is calculated to oxcite deep and anxious inquiry in the public mind. I will quoto the #holo paragraph in which the remark occurs, that its forco and connection may bo better understood : " Instances of this misohievous error are found in many quarters?in legislative halls and in your columns, where the seller, or possessor of the necessaries of life for people and armies, tho extortioner, the speculator, tho enemies of I he cause and country who refuse the Treasury Notes, or hold back their surplus, because they distrust that currency, or moan to force famine prices still higher, are all blended in the samo category with tho creditor, who lent his coin, who lias patiently waited, who asks 110 payment, but simply declines to receive what he never lent; what, confessedly, is not money; and what will pay no more than one-fourth of his debt."' This remark shows first, that there is such a thing as money, and second, that Confederate notes are nut money. Such an announcement as this naturally creates alarm in tho public mind, aud properly excites the , spirit of earnest inquiry into the facts of tho case. Tho Hist inquiry is, what is money? "Morrimac" has evidently taken the legal tender only as money. That tho legal tender of a country is money, there is no doubt whatever, but that thoro is other money than the legal tender, is equally free from doubt. Monty is a pieco of gold, silver, copper, or paper, marked by government with certain insignia stamped or printed upon it, and is used in payment for the purchase of produce and merchandize, and also for the payment of debts created by the previous purchase of these things, and for liabilities incurred by the barroiving of money. The legal tender was enacted by government for tho relief of debtors, and not a moro ketch for tho benefit of creditors, which would evidently be tho case, if nothing is money but ' tho legal lender." In the oldor countries of Europe, where, in the course of time tho accumulation of money capital exceeded the objects of profitable investment, tho rate of interest was naturally depreciated; the legal tender law bo came a public necessity, otherwise the debtor could never have relieved himself from his obligations, but would havo been forced to loan his money, which he designed for the payment of his obligations, at a loss rate of interest than he was paying, or to employ it in some other wuv nt n vo^.>-iil..o In this country no such necessity, ot anything like public character, bus ever existed. The legal tender law with us was purely imitative. It cniuc to us from lingland, with many other laws both nsefhl and useless. It diu not havo its origin in our real wants and necessities. Until England had paper money she had 110 legal tender law; but when her trade and commerce demanded more money to carry it on than the gold and silver mines could furnish, she instituted paper money. When paper money became common, and money capital had accumulated to an undue extents the rate of interest depreciated, and monej' lenders becamo loatb, and even refused to tako money of any kind for the good interest payiug notes, bonds ana mortgages they held, to the manifest injury of the debtor. Then the legal tender became a necessity, and it was enacted that the debtor, by tendering certain eoius bearing certain insignia, iho creditor, was obliged to take them in payment of the obligations be held, or his claim was forfeited. This had the desired effect; it raised the rate of interest, and restored things to their proper equilibrium, tyoro recently a similar state of thiDgs arose, trade and commerce again increased; more paper money was required to meet its ^ wants; money capital again increased unduly, and the ^ rate of interest again fell ; a new necessity arose, and was met by making the paper money notes of the Bank of Knglauti a legal tender, and again we see in* terest rise, and things restored to their proper relations. With us, notwithstanding the remarkable facility with which paper money has beon manufactured, since my earliest remembrance, and especially during the last thirty years, the almost unlimited property invest ments, with its continually advancing prices, and its profitable returns, have prevented an undue accumulation of money capital, kept tho rate ot interest up, and has heretofore rendered the 44 legal tender law," I may say, perfectly obsolete. The cry has been universal with the creditor, pay me, pay me; and with the debtor, indulge me, indulge me. Now, from causes well understood, money is in excess of the objects of Drofitable invostmAnt* and ix* the first time in the history of t>ur country, "the legal tender law" is becoming a necessity, and as that law, as it. at present stands, only applies to the gold and silver coins of the United States, it is likely to prove rather an injury than a relief to the debtor, for whose benefit it evidently had its"origin. For the creditor now to claim that tho debtor shall pay him in nothing but "the legal tender" of the country or continue to pay former rates of interest against his will, is monstrous in the extreme, and a total perversion of the objocts and origin of that law. There has been no time certainly in the last thirty years, out what the money of the country has exceeded that portion of it made "the legal tender," at least IS nr 90 frvnnrv anil it ifi nnnn onnh tooia !.?* __ ... ? -J tuav Hit UIO indebtedness of tlie country has been created, and if the doctrine taught by the remark under review, that Confederate notes are confessedly not money, be persevered in, and obtain anything like goneral currency, then the government will have to follow the example of England, and extend the legal tender act, to its paper money issues, or a sufficient amount of it to secure relief to the debtor. I would remark that I have not these various acts creatings the legal tender before me, nor am I familiar with their phrazeology. but that the origin and objects that I have attributed to them is correct, I think, oan. scarcely admit of doubt. Y** %' ? *