The daily phoenix. (Columbia, S.C.) 1865-1878, May 26, 1868, Image 2
*r >'*^m*t>m *****
FOB ?I8TBIOT OIWIOEBS
A. L??SQ^$0-N.
For Clerk cf Court.
D. B. DEsAUSStmE.i
For Tax-Collector.
P. H, SHULER.
fir Coroner.
HARRISON.
For Probate Judge.
F. H. ELMORE.
For County Gommissittners.
JOHN SCOTT. N. J. D?BARD.
B. O'NEALE, JB.
For School Commissioner. .
H. O'NEALE, JR.
MUNICIPAL OFFIOEBS- CITY COLUMBIA.
For Mayor.
COL. J. P. THOMAS.
For A/<&r^n!-WAKD NO. 1.
T. T7. XVAJLTUJUIJJJJ ri.
CLARU "rVARING.
JAMES CLAFFEY.
WAiiD BO. 2.
?. A. BEDELL.
R. Ii. BRYAN.
O. Z. BATES.
TV ABD KO. 3.
W. P. GEIGER.
\V. T. "WALTER.
JOHN AGNEW.
WARD BO. 4.
EDWARD HOPE.
W. O. SWAFFIELD.
L. P. MILLER.
COLUMBIA.
Tuesday Morning, May 26,1868.
Tb? Democratic Meeting In Charles?
ton.
The Charleston papers give us an
account of the Democratic meeting
in that oity on Saturday last. The
News states that about 250 persons
wore present, and adds:
"It is a note-worthy fact, that of
the many gentlemen, prominent in
Charleston city politics, whoso names
were attached to tbe call, only two
Messrs. J. B> Campbell and O. H.
Simonton-were observed by our re?
porter, in the assemblage."
Col. Simonton was the Chairman,
and made an address in good taste,
which wo shall take pleasure in pub?
lishing.
Col. R. B. Rhett, Jr., introduced
the re solutions, and these were se?
conded by J. B. Campbell, Esq. The
resolutions affirm tho policy of unit?
ing with the National: Democratic
Party, and tender to the Democracy
and to the faithful conservativo Re?
publicans of the United States, the
grateful acknowledgments of tho peo?
ple of Charleston, for the zeal and
earnestness with whioh they are strug?
gling to save us from the barbarism
of military and African despotism
under which we uow are, and for
their efforts to restore the Constitu?
tional liberty established by the
blood of a common ancestry. So far
so good. We heartily approve these
resolutions. Bat the remaining reso?
lutions are made ap of a repetition
of tho same charge, that we have be
foro heard, of Charleston not being
allowed a chanco to be represented in
the April Convention. What, now,
are the facts? The facts are, that
Charleston received an earlier invita?
tion than auy of the tweDty-one Dis?
tricts that were represented. She re?
ceived notice of lite meeting as soon as
Richi- . herself. For notice of the
intended Convention was telegraphed
to the Charleston papers as soon as
tho step was agreed upon in Colum?
bia, and tho morning papers of
Charleston gave the notice that ap?
peared in the Phoenix of the same
day. As to tho duty of a special
consultation with auy ono Charlestou
gentleman, outside of the public
cull, wo are not satisfied that this
was incumbent upon tho Columbia
Committee. We admit that Charles?
ton is a valuable and esteemed ele?
ment in the State, and we know that
ono of Clio Govornors of our State
once said that, "os the head to tho
body, so is Charleston to the State."
But we submit that this is not tho
case uow, though it may have been
so ouce. At least, we of the upper
und middle country claim for our?
selves a portion of the brains nf kb?
?tate.
But Mr. Rhett's resolutions go
further, viz: That whilst they of
Charleston (at least those whom they
ropresent) express their (hanks to the
late Convention for their statistical ex?
posure of tltose forced upon us as legis?
lators and voters, yet the resolutions
say:
"Wo regret that some parts of their
proceedings do not ooinoido with our
views; and while we regret, also, that
they should have thought it proper
to appoint a representative of this
District who has never been a re?
sident thereof, and while we do not
j think it ^ia* ot considerate to
' ?r?tirely excluded tho old oit?, os.
Oharlostou, and tho wtiiolo. Iow*?mn
j trfBfr?aa jpjtjriicipaUoa in fc&efr 'ifcoift
tivfcorganij?ation foe tho whole State,
y et'wo ar? .Wiking to aooepfc the aug*
gestion that* those causes of regret
were tbe result of inadverteneo orr
acoident."
The sum and substance of which is,
that they thank tis for tho statistics
given in the ..appeal," but, beyond
that, thoy do not approve, of the ac?
tion of the Convention, nor of the
action of the Executive Oormnittee
appointed to be the executive agent
of the Convention. Perhaps the
conservative proposition on the ques?
tion of suffrage- docs not suit those
Finally, the r?solutions suggest
another Convention, and provide for
Charleston taking care of herself, in
case the above proposition falls still?
born. Upon these resolutions, wo
offer no comment. Tho people will
answer for themsolves.
As to Mr. J. B. Campbell's spoeoh,
it was but an endorsement of Mr.
Rhett's propositions. Tho only fea?
ture wo care to notice, was that he
excuses Gen. Wade Hampton from
any connection in the mis-doings of
that presumptuous committee that
omitted to call into its counsols the
weighty suggestions of the honorable
gentleman himself.
He exouses General Hampton, but,
at the vsame time, pays that distin?
guished soldier and statesman the
doubtful compliment of suggesting
that he was made the instrument of
doing Charleston what he calls a
wrong.
We have this to say, that it is a
matter of regret that these gentlemen
should disturb the harmony that pre?
vails in the conservative ranks in this
Stete.
The Convention that assembled
here, in April last, announced a mas?
ter policy, and initiated a statesman?
ship suited to the times. The move?
ment has been followed np through?
out the whole ' State, and attained
significance abroad. We scarcely
think that the adherents of that Con?
vention, and its policy, will yield to
the unreasonable demands that come
from the Charleston meeting. We say
the Charleston meeting, because we
do not believe that the two hundred
and fifty persons present on the occa?
sion referred to, justly represent the
sober feeling of that city. Going as
far as any one iu the appreciation
of the noble characteristics that be?
long to Charleston, we believe that
she will not commit herself to
an antagonism against the Demo?
cratic movement that hos gained so
much gronnd in this State, and se?
cured so many followers.
Statement from thc State Central
Executive Committee.
We have been requested by the
State Central Committee to state, that
inasmuch os they are the officers of
the late Convention, they do not re?
gard it as their duty to call any other
Convention. If the dissentients do
siro a new Convention, let them call
it. These geutlemen are citizens of
tho State, and havo tho sumo rights
that all others oitizeus have. If it is
supposod that tho lato Convention
did not represent the sentiments of
the people of tho State, then let them
try that sentiment, and thev will
thou, wc trust, bo satisfied; they will
then, wo trust, unite cordially with
the people, and not disunite them by
groundless complaints. It may bo
that theso gentlemen are correct, but
wo aro prepared to abido tho issue
and tho trial. Our advice now to
South Carolina is expressed in one
word, UNITY ! UNITY !! UNITY 1!!
and not division at homo among our
own people. This is no time to di?
vide, but it is tho timo to act har?
moniously, for tho beat interest of
our grand old St aie, humiliated as
she is, and sitting in her garments of
cc, ~c?pii>g for her emidren and
asking to be comforted.
A letter from Gettysburg denies
the statement that the Confederate
dead are to be buried in the National
Cemetery at that place. Tho act
incorporating tho Cemetery specifi?
cally sets apart the ground in per?
petuity for the burial of the remains
of the Union soldiers.
??? -
Reports come from Virginia that
the wheat crop of that State never
looked more promising than now.
Similar accounts como in frou North
Carolina.
The Political Cr?ate of the ?a y-The
Extrcnu? Radical?.
Wit?f no disposition tc exaggerate,
bot with tbe intention ' to adhere
striotrwt? the troth, we say, in all
sinoerity, that the history of parties
no where shows snch an unreason?
able, vindictive, factious spirit, as has
been exhibited by the extreme men
of the radioal party of this country.
When'the South laid down her arms,
at the close of the late war, and
accepted, with manliness aud catidor,
the result of her defeat, the magna?
nimity of Grant and Shermau, and
the course of those North who advo?
cated the samo generous and con?
siderate policy, promisflil an oarly
restoration of the peace and unity of
the land. All were disposed to for
i o, if they could not forget. But
soon did the malignant spirit of the
extremists North show its purpose.
Not enough for them was our surren?
der of slavery, our acknowledgment
of defeat on tho question of the
peaceful right of secession; not
enough for them our ruined homo
steads, our ravaged fields, our broken
fortunes, our struggle for bread, our
disappointed^hopes; not enough that
we mourned for the flower and pride
of the land we love, fallen upon tho
field of battle. But we aro called
apon to spit upon our past record,
aud, in the celebrated amendment
article, ourselves to sot tho seal of
condemnation upon the honored
names of the war-the names con?
spicuous either in the cabinet or the
field. The South almost unani?
mously refused thus forever to put
upon her own brow the brand of a
shameful repudiation, and we honor
hor for the rejeotion of the proposed
amendment to the Constitution. But
this is not the great charge upon
which the radioal party might be
arraigned before tho high oourt of
civilized nations-and arraigned,
too, to certain conviction. That
party bas done what was never done
before. Its party crime is original.
We have heard of Jewish vengeance,
of Grecian and Boman conquests, of
Gothio outrages, of Moslem tri
umphs. Bat it was reserved for tho
radical party of this country, under
the inspiration of the Puritan mind
of New England, to perpetrate, or to
seek to perpetrate, aa enormity
heretofore unparalleled in tho world's
history, in the case of either civilized
or uncivilized peoples, in ancient or
modern times. We mean the put
ting, or the effort to put, the domi?
nant rate under the foot of the info
rior-the subordination of the wealth,
the integrity, the worth, the brains
of a {section to the control of au
inferior race, lately slaves, aud want
ing, for tho present at least, iu all
the elements of a governing class
ignorant, poor, weak ia mind and
morals, with no political experience,
and utterly .?oficient in the attributes
that should attach to those who are
given the exercise of political control.
This is the great crime of the day
This tho work of extreme, insane,
hate-blinded radicalism. And for
this violation of the laws, both of
God and man, and for other enormi?
ties, which timo would fail us wero
we to attempt to recount, that party
is doomed; and even now muy be
discerned in it signs of approaching
dissolution. Let it go down, aud
with it sink into political death its
Southern adberonts, and over its
gravo wo may bo enabled to raise
again the fabric of auother Union,
which shall bo tho objoot of a com?
mon regard, and bo a uuion <>r
hearts, us well as a Union of States.
Tho New York Tribune declares
that nothing now prevents ?tue Pre?
sident from annulling every law
passed by Congress relative to recon?
struction. He has only to declare
void tho military bill, recall the de?
partment commanders, dissolve and
?i?p?fec tim Southern State .Legisla?
tures, and summon new Legislatures
to bo elected by tho white vote ouly.
If Gen. Grant refuses to issue or
transmit such orders, the President
may annul the bills placing the con?
trol of the army under Grant, and
order him to report for duty at
Galeua, Illinois. Having had new
State Governments elected in tho
Sooth on tho white vote only, he
may call, a special session of Con?
gress, and by military force require
it to admit the Southern Senators
from his Johnsonized Governments
to their seats.
M.mff?-,\- 'il "' ? ?
A. SjtilMMi? Article?.
I^^BjBBt?erenees by tho newspa
iHv n/st?cles of impeachment
sro ushk??y ?nado to them by their
numbers, aud^ae; tho final vote is
likely to bo telegraphed to the press*
in the same way, it will be con?
venient for Onr readers to have a brief
synopsis of the articles:
ARTICLE I-Declares that the Pre?
sident issued an order for the re?
moval of Mr. Stanton from the office
of Seoretary of War. the Senate then
being in session, intending thereby
to violate the Tenare-of-Oflice Act.
ABT. II-Charges that the Presi?
dent, there then being nc vacancy
in the War Office, authorized Gen.
Thomas in writing to act as Sec
k olary w* inier tm, the ?Senate then
being in session, and with intent to
violate the Tenuro-of-OIBce Act and
tho Constitution.
ABT. III-Is liko tho second, ex
copt that it alleges that tho President
appointed Thomas Secretary of War
without the advice and consent of
the Senate, and without authority of
law, and with tho intent to violate
tho Constitution.
ART. IV-Alleges that the Presi?
dent conspired with Thomas and
other unknown persons to prevent
Stanton, by threats, from neting ns
Secretary of War, thereby violating
the GouBpiraoy Act of July, 18G1, aud
tho Constitution.
ART. V-Charges that the Presi?
dent conspired with Thomas and
others to prevent the execution of
the Tenure-of-Ofllce Aot; and that in
pursuanoe of this conspiracy, ho and
they attempt to hinder Stauton, by
unlawful means, from actiug ns Sec
rotary of War.
ART. VI-Alleges that tho conspi?
rators intended by force to get pos?
session of tho publio property in the
War Department, contrary to tho
Conspiracy Act of July, 1861, and
with the purpose of thus violating
the Tenure-of-Offico Act.
ABT. VII-Is very much like arti?
cle VI, merely adding that the con?
spiracy to get possession of tho pro?
perty in the War Office was formed
with* the intent to violato the Tenure
Act, omitting all allegations as to the
Act of July, 1861.
ABT. Viii-Declares that the ad in?
terim appointment of Thomas was
made with the intent on the part of
the Presideut to control the military
appropriations for the War Depart?
ment in an illegal manner, intending
thereby to violate the Tenure Act.
ABT. IX-Charges that tho Presi?
dent, on the 22d of February, 1868,
instructed Gen. Emory, (the com?
mander of the troops in Washingtou,)
that tho Act of March, 1867, which
requires all military orders tc be
given through Gen. Grant, was un?
constitutional; and that the Presideut
tried to persuade Emory to disregard
this low and receivo orders directly
from him.
ART. X-Relater to tba speeches
made by the President at Washing?
ton, in August, 1866, about Congress
hanging on the verge of tho Govern?
ment, and at Cleveland and St.
Louis, iu the following t>cptembor,
while "swinging around the circle."
ART. X-Charges that tho Presi
dent declared in a speech at Wash?
ington, in August, 1866, that the
Thirty-ninth Congress was not a eon
stitutioual body, but a Congress ol
only a part of the States; that he
thus deniod that its legislation wa:
valid and obligatory upon him, ex
oept so far as he approved the same,
and also denying its power to pro?
pose amendments to the Constitn
tion; aud, in pursuance of this donia],
unlawfully dovised means to prevent
tho execution of tho Tenure Act, bj
trying to prevent Stanton from re
sn i niug his duties as Secretary o!
War; and also devised means to pre
vont tho execution of tho Act re
quiring army orders to bo given
through Geu. Grant, and also devisoc
means to prevent the execution o
"tho Act to provide for tho mon
efficient government of tho robe
States," commonly called tho ltecou
struction Act. These offences an
popularly called misprision of per
jury-?. e., trying to induce o?lieer?
to violato their oaths, or devjsiuj
plans to violato ono's own oath, bj
refusing to execute theso laws.
This is tho substance of all tlx
articles, omitting their technicalities
aud paying no regard to their verbi
age.
-
M Aili ARRANGEMENTS.-Tho pos
office open during the weok from 8>i
a. ta. to 6 p. m. On Sundays, fron
4?? to 5)? p. m.
The Charleston and Western mail
are open for delivery p. m., r.:;;
close at 8\.? p. m.
Northern-Opon for delivery a
8'.j a. m., closes at 2.45 p. m.
Greenville-Open for delivery 5,S
p. m., doses at 8 p. m.
There was quite a serious affray ii
Mobile on the 9th inst., between tb
newly appointed- colored polioe ii
that place, and the United State?
soldiers stationed there. Some eu
Saged in it were bayonetted, somi
eaten, and one man killed.
A young man named Wilban
Brown had his arm out off betweei
the wrist and elbow by a buzz-saw
at Andover, Moss., last Saturday
It fell at bis feet, and he picked i
up, stopped the mill and went hom
alone.
Tomato soup will be ?erred np to?
day, at tho Exchange Restaurant, in
rear of Gregg's store, at ll o'clock.
Thc Uekets for the "Black Crook"
are being rapidly disposed of. Re?
served seats can be secured at Messrs.
Wea rn Sc Hix's.
Wo call attention to an important
suggestion from the State Central
Executive Committee. It is proper
to state that this paper was prepared
before the action of the Democratic
meeting in Charleston, and has not,
therefore been prompted by bald
action.
EXCURSION ON THE COLUMBIA AND
AUGUSTA RAILROAD.-Wo are re?
quested to state that au excursion
train will be rnu over the Columbia
and Augusta Road, to Sheely's, on
Saturday next-leaving Columbia at
8 o'clock A. M., and returning, leave
Sheely's at 5 P. M. Pare for round
trip from Columbia $1, and from
Lexington Court House 50 cents.
Sheely's is tho present head of the
road, and is thirty miles from Colum?
bia, at a point near old Leesville, on
the lines of Edgefield and Lexington
Districts. It is understood that tho
residents of the vicinity contemplate
getting up a demonstration-pic-nic
fashion; and as spring chickens uve
plentiful in that section, a good time
is anticipated.
COURT OF APPEALS-May 25.-Tho
Court met at 10 o'clock A. M. Opin
ious were pronounced as follows:
S. M. Smith aud wife vs. John
Caldwell. Wardlaw, A. J. Motion
for new trial granted. Separate
opinion filed by Inglis, A. J.
W. B. Merriwether ads. A. M.
Smith, Executor. Dunkiu, C. J.
Appeal dismissed.
James S. Guignard, et al, ads. Mary
S. P. Gibbes, el al. Glover, J. De?
cree reaffirmed.
Lucy A. Mobley vs. Edward D.
Mobley. Wardlaw, A. J. Motion
dismissed.
Mary A. McPherson, et al, vs. Ed?
ward Lynah and James W. Gray.
Wardlaw, A. J. Decree affirmed.
W. J. Magrath vs. the Bank of
South Carolina and Agnes Calder.
Dunkin, C. J. Decree affirmed.
James Cosgrove ads. Richard M.
Butler. Glover, J. Motion dis?
missed.
Francis L. Wilson ads. the State.
Glover, J. Motion dismissed.
Agnes Calder, Executrix, et al, ads.
Amos F. Eno, et al. Dunkin, C. J.
Decree reversed.
Patrick Laffan vs. John D. Kenne?
dy and Daniel Mcsweeney. Ward
law, A. J. Motion dismissed.
The case of John W. Colburn vs.
P. J. Holland, Exeoutor. J. S. Col?
burn, et al, was resumed. Mr. Lord
concluded his argument commenced
on Friday. Mr. Rutledge was heard
for P. J. Holland, Executor, until 3
o'olock, P. M., wheu the Court ad?
journed.
A CAMPAIGN PAPER.-Tho proprie?
tor of the Phonix has received seve?
ral communications from prominent
and influential gentlemen of the up?
country, asking that ho publish, for
the benefit of the conservative peo?
ple of the State-black and white
alike-a cheap campaign paper, de?
voted especially to political informa?
tion and suggestions aud truths, to
the end that tho cause of the Demo?
cratic party bo strengthened, and
that whites aud blacks alike may
realize that tho peace and prosperity
of thc State depend npou tho adop?
tion of the conservativo principles
set forth in the platform of tho De?
mo ilic party of this State. He has
conferred with the State Central
Executive Committeo of the party
here, nnd they advise that, inasmuch
as tho Phonix is already carrying out
tho views which our friends of the
upper country desire enforced, tho
Weekly Gleaner, issued from this
offico, and containing tho matter of
our daily issues, be directed to the
en m lin i rr r. purposes u?ludud io. He
proposes, therefore, to devote one
half of tho Gleaner to political mat?
ters, and to mako it, ?mr excellence, a
paper for the political nso and pur?
poses of the conservative movement
in this State. Tho Weekly Gleaner,
for the next six mouths, will, there?
fore, be furnished at the following
rates :
To sing'e subscribers.$1 50
" clubs of 25 " . 1 25
*. ?? ?? 50 *? . 1 00
Tho proprietor may add, that the
Phonix will continuo to do the best
it can for its patrons, and as its pros?
pects improve, will elements of new
interest be added to the paper.
From Gen. Cnnby's order, it will
be Been that only the municipal elec?
tions are postponed.
MUNICIPAL EliSCTION POSTPONED.
It bas been already mentioned in
the Mercury, tba?' Governor Orr bad
writteb a strong letter to Gen. Cunby,??
on the subject Of postponing thc^
municipal elections. On Saturday,
a number of citizens presented a
petition to tbe General, on the same
subject, and the following order was
issued from the headquarters Of this
Military District, on Saturday after?
noon:
[General Orders No. 87. j
So muoh of General Orders No. 77,
of April 28, 1808, and the Circulars
of May 1 and May IA, 1863. from
these headquarters, as provides for
the electiou of municipal officers in
cities and incorporated toWns in
South Caroliua, on the 2d of June
next, is hereby revoked; and tbe
officers to bo chosen at that election
will be only tho County officers
named in Paragraph III of General
Orders No. 77, above* referred to.
Tho Mercury presumes that the
reason of the distinction made be?
tween municipal and County elec?
tions is, that County officers are
regarded as belonging to tho Execu?
tive Department of the State Go?
vernment, and according to an order
already issned, will not be allowed to
assume the duties of the offices to
which they may be elected, until
after the State is admitted to repre?
sentation in Congress. Then tho only
oath necessary for them to take in
order to qualify, will be the oath pre?
scribed by tho Constitution recently
carried by the forms of au election
in this State.
NEW* ADVERTISEMENTS.-Special at
teution is called to the following ad?
vertisements, published for the first
time this morning:
D. C. Peixotto & Son-Auction.
Cantwell's-Pig Hams.
G. Diercks-Hams, eto.
Jacob Hussung-Declination.
It Impeachment Knited!
Mr. Bingham says it is yet pend?
ing. Mr. Stevens declares the same.
And some of our radical cotempo
raries are eagerly discussing the
chances o' conviction on the second
and one or two of the other articles.
It is not the intention of the mana?
gers, evidently, to allow the affair to
drop; though whether they have
adopted the Springfield Republican's
suggestion, and propose that the Se?
nate shall carry about the verdict in
its belly, or whether they believe that '
a verdict of guilty may ultimately be
had, because of their importunity, we
are cruelly left to conjecture
The Senate itself will have some?
thing to say on the subject. For
though it is understood that new
articles may be presented at any time
before the close of the trial, the Se?
nate, on resuming, may decide that
the proceeding shall close forthwith.
It cannot decide otherwise, without
making itself a party to the unscru?
pulousness whicn bas brought dis?
credit on the prosecution. Apart
from the managers and a few extrem?
ists, the trial is considered already
over, and any attempt to press the
remaining articles, or ta prolong the
proceeding, is deprecated as inex?
pedient. The Tribune admits that
"the eleventh was deliberately, and"
it doubts not "judiciously, selected
as the article that would command
most votes. This /ailing, all fail."
In the same spirit, the Albany Even?
ing Journal-which wo are sorry to
find echoing tho current slanders
against Mr. Chose aud the seven Se?
nators-remarks:
"We regard the voto upon the
eleventh article of the impeachment
charges, as tantnmount^to acquittal
upon all. Some partiel _ profess to
believe that there will still be a ma?
jority for tho second article-but we
cannot conceive it possible, nor would
conviction, accomplished by B change
in the attitude of any Senator, work
good to tho country, or the Republi?
can party. Impeachment is n fail?
ure, and as such we most meet it,
howover disagreeable the conclusion.
It is indeed to be regretted, that in
tho excitement of tho hour, a vote
upon tho remaining articles was post?
poned until the 26th. The case should
have been closed by the Senate ou
Saturday."
Delay will make the failure more
conspicuous, and the humiliation of
tbe impeachers moro complet*? Thc
iriai, per se, may be defended. We
always doubted its expediency, and
still doubt the sufficiency of the
proofs adduced in 'support of the
charges. The most that can at pre?
sent bo alleged against it, however,
is, that it was unwisely conceived
and not wisely managed. But if tho
prosecution, having selected the
strongest article, will not abide by
the verdiot, but on tho contrary seek
to continue the contest, by engineer?
ing votes on other articles, or by re?
opening the case, and introducing
new charges, it will convict itself;
und the Suncte, in tolerating the tac?
tics, will sully tho honorable record
earned during tho progress of the
trial. Such a course is certainly
possible, bnt we consider it very im?
probable.-New York Times.