BT E. B. MUKRA TeJ??hj}^1 Column, J. G. CLINKSCALES, Editor. Prof. W. S. Morrison, who conducted our Institute last year and the year before to the great satisfaction and delight of all concerned, will be with us at Wil liamston, and, though not ono of the in? structors this time, will favor the Insti? tute with two or three of his interesting lectures. Prof. Morrison has very great* ly endeared himself to our teachers, and all will be pleased to meet him again. There were some bad papers presented i to the Examining Board at the last ex? amination. It is passing strange that some persons who spell so poorly and write so badly wonld think of trying to teach school. Having made that asser? tion, it gives us pleasure to say that Prof. Ligon considered Mr. Mitchell's paper the finest ever presented to our Board. Mr. Mitchell is teaching at Shady Grove, and is giving entire satisfaction to trus? tees and patrons. It is worthy of men tion, too, that the next best paper was presented by a young lady who has never been taught ia any other than the public schools of this county. With her own hands that young lady and her mother have supported an invalid father and . seven younger brothers aud sisters. Her education was gotten by snatches! when she could be? spared from the field. We are always ready to lift our hat to .any lady,, but it gives us peculiar pleasure to bare our head iu the presence of a woman "of such sterling worth as this. This young woman; who is as modest as she is intellectual, deserves the success, she has achieved. Children will be safe in her hands. ^_ Mr. J. P. Smith strikes the key note when he says,~^The demand is for better ttchook and better teacher*" Give us bet* tor teachers and we will have better schools. We have pleaded long and patiently for better teachers, better patrons, (more thoughtful, more earnest, more deeply interested patrons), better houses, and better schools. Our friend is right again when he says that public interest in the cause of education is on the up grade. Especially is that the case in the neighborhood of historic old Slab* town. What criticism we had to make of the school-house at that place was prompted by the kindliest of motives, and we are certainly gratified to learn that the good people thereabouts took it in that way. ..Our plain duty is to turn every possible, stone to improve the schools, let the public school system be what it may. If what we said has at all shaken the sleeping energies of the in? telligent citizens of Slabtown and vicinity, we are grateful. And, now, in behalf of "W. P. H.? wethank Mr. Smith for his timely exhortation. A good sermon has been followed by a good exhortation. Let the ball roll i Who next ? Mr, Editor : I think "W. P. H." is correct when he BayB that the interest in schools .is daily increasing; and we should all hai?. the awakening with de* light, and by proper agitation keep the j ball in motion, until a system of schools is developed that will meet the wants of the people. In our section of the county greater interest is being manifested in the cause of education than has been done for some time past. Without en* tering'into any discussson of the defects the free school system, but simply taking it as it is, I think that there is much that can be done to improve onr schools, and ^ elevate our profession. The demand is . for be tier schools and better teachers, and we, wht> expect to meet the requirements of the times, must bestir ourselves. We must lay hold of every advantage offered ns for improvement, or we will be called upon to give place to others better pre* pared to meet the needs of the case. In view of the above facts, I think the out* , look for one profession is brighter than it has ever been before, if we will only "play our part," Thanks to you for your suggestion in regard to our special needs iu the way of a beAter building. Our people are now discussing the matter seriously, and I feel assured that at no distant day, we will enjoy an academy second to none in the county. J. P. S. Section 1012 of the school law says: "T&iei Boards of Trustees shall have authority and it shall be their duty * * * * fo-ftorploy teachers, etc." Trustees have not observed this im* portant matter as they ought to have done. : It has been the custom all over the county to allow the people to select the teacher; and that selection has beeu made generally just about in this way .?? Someaman, or woman concludes to'teach'at a certain place. He goes around among the patronB and gets ss many as possible to promise to send to him. Nine out of ten of the patrons are indifferent as to who teaches, just so some? body keeps the children out of their Way, and", consequently, agree and prom? ise to send to the first man or woman .who asks for patronage. The teacher, having the promise of twenty or thirty pupils, announces that he will open school on a certain day, without once consulting the' trustees about it. Fre? quently a very Inferior teacher gets pos? session of a school in this way. The trustees pay no attention to the matte? un?i'/thei teacher comes op with his papers for approval. All this is wrong, and grew out of the dereliction of trus? tees. No teacher ought to be allowed to teach a day without being able to show a written statement, or contract over the signatures of the board of trustees, and no such contract ought to be signed by the trustees until after the applicant's moral character and past record have undergone a thorough examination. But, you say, the mau has a certificate from the County Board of Examiners. Very good?suppose he has. A man may have a good moral character and pass a satisfactory examination before the Board, and yet be objectionable as a teacher. Bnt, again, we are confronted with the suggestion that trustees get no pay for their work, and that they can not reason? ably be expected to do much of it. The law does not expect, or require, mach Y & CO. work of the trustees, but what it does require ought to be paid for. Still they are not paid, and we must deal with things as we find them. Bather than half do the work required of them, or reduce their actual labor to the minimum, on account of no remuneration, it would be better for the trustees to resign and let some body else try it. Each board of trustees ought to have at least one meet? ing each month during the school session, and one meeting a month before the session begins. At the regular monthly meetings they should require all the teachers in the township to be present, with their reports properly made out, givi Dg special attention to the total en? rollment and the average attendance. When the papers are overhauled in the presence of the teac hers, then they should be approved. Not only this: at these regular meetings, which might be held at some school-house in the township, the whole day should be spent in regular school room work. This plan has been tried in two of the townships and works well. The trustees and teachers get better acquainted with one another, and the fraternal feeling existing among the teachers is deepened and widened. At the meeting held one month, or longer, before the session begins, propositions of applican ts for schools should be consid? ered and contracts drawn. This seems to be asking but little of trustees, and we are sure auch a plan would bring good results. The Williamston trustees, who have had regular monthly meetings, propose to employ their teachers for the next gessioD, and to do it in time to get good ones. Their purpose is to stop the prac? tice of approving the claims of any teacher who happens to suit the whims of a community, however loose his meth? ods (want of method), or however worth? less he may be as a teacher. Not only so; they propose to provide a nice little library of two or three, dozen books for the exclusive use of their teachers, and to take for each one or two papers.: In other words, Lander and Hogg and Rich? ardson are wide awake and are moving op things. Lander is a Professor in the College at Williamston?he gives his attention to this matter freely and cheer? fully ; Hogg and Richardson are two of the best firmers in their district?they give their l;ime cheerfully and are grow? ing in interest. Other trustees in the county are just as able and willing as these. We do hope they will lay some plans and exe? cute them. Mr. Peterkin's Method of Procuring Pare Cotton Seed, I take this method of replying to the numerous letters, asking how to improve and keep cotton seed pure. We must first decide upon the kind of cotton we want. You n.ust have an ob? ject in view. If you want a prolific cot? ton, select from small or dwarfed stalks that are not highly fertilized; but such a selection will not stand a drought when full of fruit. My idea is to have stalk, leaf, limbs and fruit in proportion, and roots will be there to penetrate the earth to feed it with fertilizer and moisture. It is a mistake to select seed from a highly fertilized pet patch. It should be on lands that are not cotton sick. It should be after grain or one or two years rested, and lightly fertilized, then pick or select such stalks as have bolls on every limb and of uniform Bize. If you can get a stalk three feet high and as broad as it is tall, with three bolls to the limb, each boll the same dimensions, you would have a fine selection to start with, but such a stalk is hard to find. Bolls all of one size is one of the prin? cipal points in selecting. Cotton that has been selected for its many bolls are not uniform. The first boll on the limb, we will say, is one and a fourth inches in diameter,, the second is one inch and the third is three-fourths of an inch, and the fourth sheds off. The largest boll makes by far more lint than the second, and we can't measure our crop by the second and. Bay it is an average of the three, any more than we can say three twelve-inch logs will make as much lumber as one thirty-six inches in diameter. When you find a stalk that suits you, drive a stick by it, and plant it by itself the nextyear. One stalk is enough to start with. Be sure not to fertilize your patch too highly. When you get a good cotton let it alone. Don't take every peddlers's seed that comes along. I have no doub t but that every man thinks his seed is the best and is honest in what he says, but some of them are mistaken because they don't know a good cotton from a bad one. Seed are often mixed at the gins, also by fertilizing with seed. I don't gin for my neighbors, and allow but one kind of seed to be planted on the farm. Cotton is not apt to mix or cross from the polin, as the bloom is always up and follows the sun around, and is shortlived. It opens after sunrise and shuts up as the sun goes down never to open again. It is also well coated with honey, which holds the polin in. It is never blown about as corn polin, and is only carried by bees or man. As the bees gather the honey the poliu sticks to their legs. Honey was not made for man alone, but for the purpose of carrying the polin down into the seedmaking depart? ment of the flower. The dew absorbs it, I and it then carries the polin to its needed place.?J. A. PeterHn, in Weekly Nexus and Courier. The Length of Days. At London, England, and Bremen, Prus? sia, the longeut day has sixteen and a half hours. At Stockholm, in Sweden, the longest day has eighteen and a half hours. At Hamburg, in Germany, and Dantzic, in Prussia, the longest day has seventeen hours. At St. Petersburg, Russia, in Tobolsk, in Siberia, the long? est day has nineteen hours, and the short? est five. At Tornea, in Finland, the longest day has twenty-ono hours and a half. At Ward hurs, in Norway, the day lasts from the IJlst of May to the 22ud July without interruption ; and at Spitz? bergen, the longest day is three and a half months. At New York, the longest day, June 10, has fourteen hours and fifty-six minutes; at Montreal, fifteen and a half hours. BILL ARPS LETTER, In Which he Denis In Facts and Figures. It seems very strange that young men who come from good stock and have been brought up with proper ideas of the proprieties of life shoulds eek to fight a duel. I wonder where they get such a foolish idea of honor. It used to pre\ '.!, I know, but we thought that modern civilization had about wiped out that stain?that stigma upon our humanity? that Sancho Panzo seutiment that would fight a windmill because it turned. The question that concerns society is, how do young men acquire such notions? Of course they do not acquire them at home, for I do not suppose there is a respectable parent in the State who would teach his son that it was right under any circumstances to send or accept a challenge. Duelling has had its day and is now under the ban. Ben Hill gave its hideous corpse the last kick in hi3 memorable reply to Alex. Stephens, and he deserved a monument for that if for nothing else. But when college boys run off to fight a duel, it is a damaging reflection on that institution and upon our system of edu? cation. Thore is already a suspicion pervading the public mind, that a college course is a risk, a peril, a hazard and I have heard many a reflective father say: "I am afraid to send my boy to college 1" So many of the graduates return home with bad habits or bad principles or exalted self esteem or a chronic indolence that parents are discouraged and disap? pointed. If the boys come horn* as the family ornaments, they soon become the family expense. Their indolence is established and they are drones in the hive. They read all the modern novels and can talk critically and learnedly, but they are of no account. They are capa? ble but there is nothing for them to do that corresponds with their mental culture and physical reluctance to work. They will not go back to the farm or the workshop and the professions are already overcrowded. Of course there are many bright and honorable exceptions, but our people are taking notice that, as a gener? al rule, the successful men of the day are not college graduates and those ho are the sons of poor parents. A boy who never did any work at home is in a bad fix to go to college. Work is the thing? a habit of work?chop the wood, make the fires, feed the stock, plant the garden and cultivate it; help all around and about the house and black his own shoes;-use the hammer and the saw, mend the broken chairs and bring rvater, do something that will save expense and that will help?help is the word. Every child should be taught to help, that it is a duty to help. When the boy has been raised this way and is ready for college send him for one year, and if he is get? ting too uppity and biggoty then let him stay at home a year and work some more and then send him back again. He can just drop back to the next class and lose nothing. But if you send a boy to col? lege who never worked at home, and let .him stay three or four years, in nine cases out of teu he will be no account. He is a finished gentleman. The perils of education are alarming. I mean education without moral and industrial training. Teachers and pro? fessors have but little to do with this. Their sole business is to (each from the books,. If the pupil stands well in math? ematics, in Greek and Latin and logic and rhetoric and philosophy, he is doing splendid. That is the big thing. In fact, it is everything so far as the teacher is concerned; and almost everything with the parents. The result is that thousands of boys are being educated as experts in indolence, in avoiding work, and in many cases they resort to forgery and embezzlement and obtaining money under false pretences. It is now an open secret at the North that education increases crime, not just a little but immensely. As illiteracy decreases crime increases in a geometrical ratio. They are almost met with the startling question which is the best, comparative ignorance with honesty or high culture i with dishonesty ? Let us look at the figures as furnished by Mr. George R. Stetson, of Boston, a philosopher, a thinker, a patriot. In 1850 there were, in round numbers, one million of people in Massachusetts and 1,236 prisoners?1 prisoner to 804 of the population. As education progressed crime progressed. Education walked and crime ran?until in 1884 there were (65,000) Bixty-nve thousand arrests, or one arrest for every 29 of the population ; and assuming that five persons constitute a family, we have the alarming result of one arrest to every six families in the State. The criminals in the house of correction of Hampden County increased from 363 to 1,131 in les3 than twenty years. The population increased only 100 per cent while crime increased 312. In the last five years it increased 96 per cent., and the sheriff in his report says this condition will proba? bly continue. Continue how long, I wonder. Will it be until, like Sodom and Gomorrah; there be Bot ten righteous men left ? In 1883, there were 1,100 commitments more than 18S2. Mr. Stetson shows that in this rapid increase of crime the native population is just as bad as the foreign. Then, again, look at the divorces?a class of statistics from which the foreign element is eliminated. In 1863 there was but one divorce to 3,134 persons. In 1880 there was one to 1,537. In 1880 there was one to 1,537. In the last ten years divorces have increased more than twice as rapidly as marriages, and more than three times as rapidly as popula? tion. Dr. Dorchester says: "The most liberal view of the question can but awaken concern for the permanence of social order and the stability of public virtue. 'In Massachusetts there was in 1882 one divorce to every thirty-four marria? ges, and the ratio increasing every year. In Rhode Island, one to fourteen and in Connecticut one to eleven. Hut the number of divorces does not represent half the number of unhappy marriages or broken marriage vows, cases that do not get into the courts, and hence it can be safely estimated that no more than eight families in ten have preserved the purity and honor of the ANDERSON, S. C, 1 family relation. Upon the purity depends not only the welfare of society, but the perpetuity of the nation. Mr. Stetson Bays: "Public morals are now so low that vast conspiracies are entered into to defraud whole communi? ties?corporations organized to defraud the innocent and unwary?public office prostituted to personal gain and the cap? ital of banks gambled with by persons high in social position. 'We find the public press pandering to a low vulgar curiosity in disgusting details of crimes against public order and decency, to satisfy a morbid public crav? ing. "We find that the books of the least value have the greatest circulation. 'We find that the largest number of the regular attendants go to church in search of amusement and intellectual gratification, rather than lor worship or instruction." These admissions are alarming to every lover of his country?to every parent who feels parental solicitude for the welfare of his children. We congratulate our people?our peo? ple of Georgia and the South?that we are still far removed from this lamenta? ble condition. Our county of Bartow is an average county, perhaps no better, no worse, than the general population of the South ; and here we have a population of 25,000, two thirds white, and only ninety-eight arrests for crime in the past year. Seventy-two of these were negroes, but we will draw no race dis? tinctions, and it is one in 250, while in Massachusetts it is one in twenty-nine. If we estimate the whites alone it is one in 650. Then compare the divorces. There were only three suits for divorce the last year, that is one divorce to.more than 7,000 people and only three divorces to every 190 marriages. No wonder that Carter Harrison de? clines to run again for mayor of Chicago. He says he needs rest and he fears that if he should again accept the office he would have no rest for be would not dare to leave Chicago for a week for fear of a communist uprising and a river of blood in the streets. There is one other very damaging assertion and it is as true at the South as at the North, and it is this: As high mental culture increases our sensibility and self-esteem it also increases our ability to accumulate wealth by ques? tionable means and to escape the conse? quences of criminal acts. Only a small portion of the iniquity in high places finds punishment. It is mainly the poor and the friendless who fill the prisons. "The conclusion of the matter," says Mr. Stetson, "is that intellectual culture without moral education rather increases the ability to escape the consequences of criminal acte, but does not prevent their commitment. Professor Sewall says 'the effect of increased intelligence without accompanying moral principles is either to invent new forms of vice or to cover up those crimes which the ignorant cannot so cunningly conceal." In all our public schools good morals are to some extent enjoined, but this is voluntary and not required. Obedience to parents is not taught, nor is the observance of the ten commandments. The duties that appertain to citizenship ?honesty in trade, troth, industry, respect for the Sabbath and for the church?are not included in any school curriculum, and yet these things are the very foundation of society and good gov? ernment, and