The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, April 17, 1879, Image 1
BY E. E. MURRAY & CO.
VOL. XTf-HO. 40.
?-t77?v OP SUBSCRIPTION.?Ose Dollar
and Fifty Cents per annum, In advance. Two
Dollars at end of year. Seventy-Fivk Cents
for six months.
Subscriptions aro not taken for a less period
than Ax months.
RATES OP ADVSRTISINO.-Ooe Do|larper
Squat o ot one Inch for the first insertion,and Fifty
Cents per square forsubscquentlnsertionslessthan
three months. No advertisements counts less
than a square.
Liberal contracts will be made with those wishing
to advertise for three, six or twelve months. Ad
vorlUng by contract must bo confined to tie im?
mediate business of the firm or individual contrac?
ting.
Obituary Notice? exceeding five lines, Tribntes
of Respect, and all personal communications or
matters of individual interest, will be charged for
at advertising rates. Announcements of marriages
and deaths, and notices of a religious character, are
??incetfullv solicited, and will be inserted grntis
"THE FIGHTING ALSTONS."
A Carolina Family Whose Members Must
All Die With Their Boots On?Strange
and Violent Deaths of the Alstons
Through Many Generations.
Atlant i letter in New York Herald.
The killing of Robert A. Alston in this
city on last Tuesday revives the memory
of the most famous family probably of the
old-time chivalry days ? the fighting
Alstons of Carolina. The history of this
audacious strain of blood is interwoven
with the history of these turbulent days
when gentlemen fought at the drop of a
bat, and a slight: movement of the pistol
finger was the answer to all insult or in?
sinuation?the close of all argument.
Tl e Alstons were gallant men of gentle
blood and usually large fortunes. They
were free livers and reckless fighters, and
frequently became involved in difficul?
ties and drained their estate with costs
and forfeitures. Probably the best known
of them, Col. Ben Alston, bad several
affairs of honor, and wounded bis antag?
onist every time be went to the field.
He was an inperious, passionate man,
and as cool under fire as he would be in
his drawing-room. His most notable
duel was with Hayne, whom be wounded
in the knee. On one occasion be was
visiting in Augusta, when a gentleman,
mistaking bim for au acquaintance,
tapped him across the shoulders with a
riding whip. Alston wheeled as quick
as lightening. The gentleman apologiz?
ed iu the most ample terms. Alston
took the whip from bis bands, lashed
him across the back, and then said:
"Now, eir, your apology isaceepted." Of
course a meeting followed, it is said
that Alston once fought a gentleman who
disputed the age of some wine of which
Alston had been boasting, throwing some
of the wine in his face that be might get
its full flavor.
Col. Bob Alston came of the family
known as the Halifax Alstons. Their
estate lay about Halifax, X. C, and tbey
dominated that whole section for years.
They were enormously wealthy, and
traveled from one of their estates to an?
other in almost regal state. They had
hundreds of slaves, and always traveled
with a coach and a small army of retain?
ers. The men were princely in their
habits of expense, and put the "code"
above the Bible. The women were high
strung and spirited. Mrs. Bub Alston,
the grandmother of the subject of
this sketch, always carried her own
sheets and pillows with her wben she
traveled, and a case of loaf-sugar.?
"I have known her," says Colonel
Tom Howard, a connection, "to put $100
on a cock fight, with her own birds, and
then stand and watch the struggle to the
death." Colonel Willis Alston, known
as "Honest Willis Alston," the grand
uncle of Bob Alston, fought a dozen
duels in one winter, numberless quarrels
haviug sprung from hisassualts on a de?
faulting State Treasurer. He killed two
men and was himself frequently woun?
ded. His favorite weapon was an old
fashioned "yager," which is a sort of
blunderbuss, carrying a double handful
of buck-shot, and of fearful execution.
A volume might be filled with the bloody
exploits of these two brothers, but I
shall deal only with the sons of Colonel
Bob Alston, who were the later Alstons'
immediate ancestors.
AN ALSTON MUST DIE WITH HIS BOOTS
ON.
Old Colonel Alston, who was himself
killed in a duel, bad three sons?Willis,
Gideon and Augustus. Willis Alston,
was the father of Colonel R. A. Alston
Euch of these brothers came to his death
by violence, or died, as the family tradi?
tion runs, "in his boots." Gideon Al?
ston, the first of the three to die, was
killed in a peculiar manner. His brother
Wills was in Nashville, on a lordly frolic
when he became very much enamored of
the lady who afterward married Sam
Houston?a Miss Trimble, I believe.
He paid her assiduous suit for several
months, and, while engaged in this dalli?
ance, formed au attachment for a young
Spanish boy, named Pelat. This boy
was friendless and poor and Alston
adopted bim, taking him with him
when he left Nashville. It appears that
there was some feeling between Pelat
und Gideon Alston; at any rate tbey left
the bouse at night and went into the
yard for the purpose of "practicing with
their pistols." Gideon was then a col?
lege boy having just turned sophomore
iu the State University. In a few mo?
ments after he left the house with Pelat
lie was found in the yard, with a pistol
bullet through his brain. Pelat said
that he had shot himself accidentally,
and this is all that was ever known of
the matter.
A FLORIDA TRAGEDY.
And now comes one of the mast re?
markable tragedies iu the history of this
section so full of tragedies. There was
living in Florida, then a primitive region,
young Leigh Beed, a man of great abil?
ity, gentleness and courage. He was |
almost idolized by the people of that
State for bis gallant services in the fierce '
Indian wars, having by his skill and
fearlessness several times saved the little
colony from destruction by the Seminoles
and their allies. A story is told of
him that will illustrate bis character and
at the same time show how delicate was
the sense of personal honor at that time.
General Beed was a political opponent
of Govenor Call's son and at the same time
his personal friend. Political feeling ran
very high, and on election day a Mr. White
made some reflections upon the integrity
of Govenor Call. Reed at once chal?
lenged him for a duel. The men went,
were both desperately wounded, and be?
haved with great gallantry, fighting I
believe, with bowie knives, their left,
hands being strapped together. Some
time afterward Beed became involved in
a difficulty with the Alstons. I give
the story as it was given me by Colonel
R. A. Alston himself. He said that an
article appeared iu a newspaper reflec?
ting on Govenor Call. Colonel Augus?
tus Alston, who was the leader of the
Call faction, demanded the name of the
author. He was furnished with the
name of General Reed, who was the lead?
er of the opposite faction. He at once
challenged General Reed, and a meeting
was arranged. The weapons selected
wre "yagers," this deadly weapon being,
it* I have said, a lavorite with the Alstons.
Colonel Alston was attended by Mr. Kc
iiuit his brother-in-law. At "the word
??One" Colonel Alston's gun exploded, it
being hair-triggered. The contents were
discharged into the air. General Reed,
aiming with deliberation, fired, and
Colonel Alston dropped dead in his
tracks. His sNter, a most spirited woman,
was nearly crazed at the news of his
death. She secured the lead that had
killed him, and with her own hands she
molded it into bullets and sent them to
her brother. Willis ANton (the father of
R. A. Alston), and implored him to
come and avenge the death of his broth?
er She wrote that be had been murder?
ed* and the Alstons adhered to this be?
lief, although the general statement is
that the meeting was a fair one, General
Reed using on I v his just right in firing
after the explosion of Alston's "yager."
At any rate it was very well understood
tint Willis Alston would seek revenge
for his brother's death as the family for
generations had made one of all their
quarrels. The first meeting between
Alston and Reed was dramatic. The
Legislature had just met and Reed bad
been elected Speaker. He was a young
man, of exceptional power and popularity
and his life promised to be brilliant and
illustrious. He had invited his friends
to the usual legislative supper, and the
banquet was in progress, everything J
going merrily and well. Suddenly a tall
figure, muffled in a swinging cloak and j
with a slouch hat drawn down over the
face, stalked through the open door. !
Without a word it made for the bead of
the table, where General Reed was sit?
ting. Instantly cries of "Alston! Al?
ston !" arose and ran down the table.
At these cries the cloak was thrown back
and Alston was recognized. Reed rose
from his seat, and, whipping a pistol out
of his pocket, leveled it at his assailant
and fired. The bull struck Alston in his i
uplifted hand, carrying away two fingers.
Tbiadidnot stop him, but brandishing
a bowie-knife, he closed on Reed. Be-1
fore the men could be parted Reed was
cut pretty severely, and Alston, I believe,!
wounded again. Alston was taken from
the room, and for some months nothing j
more was heard of the matter. One
clay General Reed was walking down the
streets of Tallahassee when he was fired ;
upon by Colonel Alston. The contents :
of one barrel of a shotgun was poured
into his shoulder, and as he turned to !
confront his assailant, the other load
went into his heart. He fell and died.
Colonel Alston's friends say that he had
given Reed notice that he intended to kill
him on sight.
killed by a mob.
Willis Alston went to Texas, where he
lived for some time. He settled near
Brazoria. There was a Dr. Steward, who
for some reason or other pursued the
matter of the Reed killing, and used
remarks derogatory to Alston. Alston
hearing of it wrote the remarks down, and
meeting Steward on the prairie one day,
asked him to say whether or not he was
responsible for those remarks. Dr.
Steward took the paper, and while pre?
tending to read it, put his hand into his
holsters and drew his pistol. He jumped
off his horse on the side opposite Alston
and fired into him. A desperate fight
ensued, in which Alston was shot twice,
and his stomach so cut that his bowels
protruded. He killed Steward, however,
pouring a load of buckshot into him after
he was prone upon the earth. He was
taken to jail almost dead. He was a
famous fiddler, and procuring a^fiddle,
sat there "with his entrails protruding,"
as be wrote to a friend, playing the old
tunes of his boyhood. His body servant
gained admission to his sell and had a
coil of rope wrapped about his body.
With this be was going to try and escape.
Suddenly a mob assaulted the jail, over?
powered the Sheriff, broke in the doors
and seized Colonel Alston. He was
game to the last, and fiddled up to the
very instant he was seized, his dauntless
face looking full upon his assailants. He
was tumbled into a blanket, the ends
twisted, and he was then hustled out of
the jail. Once out ia the street he was
thrown to the ground, still enveloped in
the blanket, and a hundred bullets were
poured into his body. Thus died the
last of the "Halifax Alstons." Tbey
were a remarkably athletic and hand?
some race of men. Gideon, who was
killed by Pelat, is always cited as the
hadspmest youngster of his day. It may
be said here that the young Castilion who
killed him was put into the navy as a
midshipman, and was drowned in the
Mediterranean. Willis Alston was a man
of wonderful strength. He once shoul?
dered a load of 800 pounds dead weight,
and carried it through the streets of
Sparta on a bet. His life was a stormy
one.. His feud with the Ingrams, a
brave and powerful family, was the
sensation of Georgia for the time it las?
ted. He always carried his "yager"
with him, and escaped the whole difficul?
ty witb only one finger shot away. This
feud was dramatized under the title of
"The Watch," and sold largely. Its
authors were never discovered, or they
would have been killed, as the heroes of
that day did not tolerate the publication of
their troubles. The manuscript was dis?
covered one morning in the yard of a
fearless widow, who published it herself
and sold it, making a great deal of money
by it.
colokel robert a. alston'.
Col. R. A Alston was a remarkable
man. Filled with all the chivalry, fear?
lessness and hot-headednessof his race, he
dreaded, above all other things, meeting
an end like bis ancestors. It was not
fear, for an Alston does not know what
fear is. He was as brave a man as ever
lived. Iu the army, as one of Morgan's
lieutenants, he was the most reckless and
daring of them all. He once actually
bad a biscuit shot from between his
teeth, but with a laugh be continued his
breakfast. He said to your correspon?
dent once: "I have a boy who is a not
headed fellow himself, and I have taken
my wife's hand in mine many a time
and knelt with her by bis bed side and
!)rayed to God that I might bequeath
lim a legacy of peace and a quiet death."
It was his highest ambition, as he has
ofton said, to break the old tradition that
"an Alston must die in his boots."
Once again, I was with him when he
was going to the field to meet Col. E. Y. I
Clarke, of a rival newspaper. The chal?
lenge had been issued, and he was just
going to take the midnight train. Sud?
denly, he turned to a dark wall, and
leaning his head on his hand, prayed
aloud that God might spare him the
death his people had died, and allow
him to live in peace till a quiet death
could claim him. He never believed,
however, that this would be granted him.
It made him gloomy to talk of it but to
his friends he would say that he knew
his destiny was to "die the Alston death."
He even had superstition that a certain
man was going to kill him. There had
never been any trouble between them,
but Alston always said, "That man is
my fate." The man whs his friend, and
never became anything else. Despite
these gloomy thoughts, Alston was a
devout believer iu the code. After be
had joinpd the church he still adhered
to bin belief. "It is a peacemaker," be
?nid. In South Carolina, where the
code stood above the State law, there
never was so quiet and decorous a commu?
nity. In Charleston county there was
not a murder in eighteen years, and the
files ot the Charleston Courier for
nearly twenty-five years do not show the
use of the word "liar" or "scoundrel" or
any similar epithets a single time.
There were no streets fights or rows,
and no assassinations. A high code or*
honor was established, and it made even
cowards brave men. He used to tell ol
a Carolina Judge (Mr. Petligrew), who,
having two men before him for trying to
fight a duel, said : "Gentlemen, it will
take me an hour to write out these War?
rant?. In the meantime there is a
steamer at my wharf that can take you
out of my jurisdiction, so that you can
conndete your work before I could hold
you." Col. Alston fought a duel himself
though he issued and accepted several
challenges. The conservative spirit of
these latter days almost always settles
these matters without the exchange of
shots. While Alston would have died
before he would have submitted to a dis?
honorable compromise, I know what
I stubborn heroism it required to carry
I him into an affair of honor. He shrank
with horror from such test. His whole
life was overshadowed by the memory
of his ancestors and their bloody ends.
He was a recognized authority on mat
| ters of the code, and was usually called
into all prominent affairs. While he
was tenacious of the honor of his princi
i pals, he never stickled for technicalities,
and usually succeeded in adjusting the
differences. Only once was he second
in a fatal meeting. He attend young
McGraw, of Charleston, and loaded the
pistol that killed Tabor. There had ap?
peared in the Charleston Mercury a com?
munication assailing Judge McGraw
signed with a non de plume. Contrary
to the usual practice of demanding the
name of the author of the offensive arti?
cle Alston demanded for McGraw satis?
faction of Tabor and his two editorial
associates, holding that gravamen of the
offence was in the publication. The
name of the author was offered and de?
clined. Tabor then announced himself
responsible. McGraw, through Alston,
challenged the three editors, naming Ta?
bor first. The parties went to the field.
At the second shot Tabor jumped straight
into the air, fell upon his back, shivered
and died. McGraw was unhurt, and the
affair stopped there.
his last meeting.
Alston had been engaged in many
presonal enconters, but never bad beeu
seriously hurt. It was harder for him
to take an insinuatiou of insnlt than for
almost any one else; but he always re
repressed his anger, if possible, avoided
truble. He was a fine talker, a genial
gentleman, of winning address, and those
saved him from many difficulties that his
impetuosity would have led bim into.
His favorite maxim, however, was saying
of Sir Boyle Roach, "The best way to
avoid danger is to meet it plump]y I" and
his boldness often sufficed where tempo?
rizing would have failed. In the trou?
ble that led to his death, after he had
been sent off by Cox to arm himself, his
first impulse was to .get a double-barreled
shot-gun and go and look Cox up and
kill him. He was thoroughly acquain?
ted with the violent habits of his enemy,
and knew best how to meet them. He
was dissuaded from this course, however
by Govenor Colquitt and others. He
was very much depressed at the idea that
Cox was hunting him down, and
seemed to have a premonition of what
was coming. He said throwing himself
into a chair in the Treasurer's office, "It
is awful hard to know that a man is
dogging you and that you have got to
kill him or be killed." Instead of going
off to arm himself, he went to a restaurant
to get some dinuer. He ate heartily,
but was very much worried. At length
he was persuaded to take a pistol,getting
one that he had never seen before, a
s. lf-cooking-six shooter. When he en
tei -*! the Treasurer's office he seemed
relieved to think he had found a retreat
from the trouble. No sort of personal
fear moved him, but the idea of blood?
shed seemed to sicken him. When ho
saw Cox enter and half draw his pistol at
a man evidently mistaken for him he
seemed to know that his time had come.
He grew a shade pale and his face har?
dened and grew stem. His first word was
an appeal:
"I am not going to have any difficulty
with you," he said; "you must let me
alone." Cox still persisted, however,
growing angrier all tho time. At lengh,
when he stepped back and closed the
door and said, "I will force you, sir," he
seemed to give up all hope. Capt. John
Nevins, his friend, who witnessed it all,
describes the scenes that followed:
"Colonel Bob rose quiet and calm, just
like he was going to make a speech
There was not a tremor about him. 'All
right, he says, we'll have it out right
here. Are you armed?" With that he
drew his pistol. Cox's was already out.
I threw myself between them and said,
'No you don't, gentlemen !' Colonel
Bon thrust bis hand over my shoulder
and fired, striking Cox in the mouth. At
the same time Cox fired and tho ball
went through my whiskers. Their hands
nearly crossed as they fired. I still held
them apart. They fired again by me and
I then turned them loose. Cox was
jumping and dodging around, but Colo?
nel Bob never moved. He stood straight
as a statue. After he had shot his fourth
shot he turned his face to me and smiled
I that peculiar smile he has. As he turned
[ he pulled trigger again and his pistol
snapped. Then Cox fired again, and
I saw a red spot ooze out in Col. Bob's
temple. Cox was trying to cock his pis?
tol again when I jumped in and threw
him back, catching Col. Bob. He sank in
my arms. When I turned, Cox wan sit?
ting in a chair spitting blood, with his
pistol on a table. He said, 'I am a
dead man.' I cut Col. Bob's shirt open."
State Treasurer Raynor says that Alston
put both his hands on Cox's breast and
said. "Ed., for God's sake let us have no
difficulty. I don't want to kill you;
you shouldn't want to kill me."
the alston destiny.
Alston had a peculiarly winning and
handsome face, and a semi-military man?
ner. He Btood like a statue while shoot?
ing, his handsome face set and stern
with the old Alston fire blazing from his
eyes, turning his erect figure by military
half wheels to present his side always to
his shifting enemy. After he had been
shot down Mr. Ed. Mercer, who knew
of his foreboding about dying with his
boots on, said, "He shall not die in his
boots, by, God!" and tenderly took them
off. "The scene at the death bedside
was affecting in the extreme. Only the
most intimate friends and the lamily
were admitted, a force of police beating
back the host that surged against the
doors. As it was evident that he must
die in a few moments, Mrs. Alston asked
Govenor Colquitt, who was kneeling by
the bedside and who was devotedly at?
tached to the dying man, to pray. With
a Aoice broken with emotion, holding
Aslton's hand, the Govenor prayed.ilouu
while every head in the room was bowed
and every eye streamed with tears. And
thus without a shudder, with hardly a
moan, bb face peaceful and half smiling
he died. In his bed, his wife and friends
about him, prayers going to God with
his fleeting sou", and only the ghastly
blue-red hole in his temple to tell thai
the old Alston destiny had overtaken
him and that he had left the old Alston
heritage to his son.
Stant. Alone.?Dr. Price's Cream
Baking Powder is free from all substances
detrimental to health. In these respects
it stand* ahme. Who can tell how many
invalids and tender children have fallen
victims to the dangerous adulterations
practiced upon food? Obtain pure ar?
ticles only.
The Truth.?In the whole United
States there is not a flavoring extract
that is so valuable, so positive, so effect?
ual in producing the most delicious, de?
sirable, and delicate flavored cakes,
pastry, ice cream, etc., as Dr. Price's
justly celebrated SpcJal Flavoring Ex?
tracts.
Radical False "Pretenses.
In order to show "the true inward?
ness" of the Republican revolutionists,
who now so diligently disturb the public
peace by crying "revolution" at the heels
of a Democratic majority of both houses
of Congress, we extract from the New
York World a recitation of the proceed?
ings of the session of 1872, when the Re?
publicans had a majority in both houses.
Here are the extraordinary scenes which
occurred on June the 11th, 1872. This
was the last day of one of the cast-iron
sessions of Grant and Blaine, immediate?
ly preceding the .second Grant Presiden?
tial campaign, the new term beginning
on the 4th of March, 1873:
"A sundry civil appropriation bill had
been passed by the House of Representa
fives several weeks previously which had j
duly reached the Senate, where the fiat |
of Conkling, Chandler, and others, had
added the ameudatory provisions author- i
i izing bayonets at the polls in the South 1
J and supervisors and deputy marshals
upon election day in the North. When
this amended bill was returned to the
House, which alone can originate appro?
priations, the Democrats resisted the
amendments. The bill reached the
House on Saturday morning, June 8, and !
I Mr. Garfield immediately moved that it
i be referred to the Committee on Appro?
priations. Mr. Brooks, of New York, |
opposed the motion, on the ground that
it would facilitate the passage of the civil
appropriation bill with the objectionable
amendment known as the enforcement
act. In reply to a question by Mr. Eld
ridge, Speaker Blaine stated that the bill
could not he reached without a two-thirds
majority, while it would require only a
majority vote to pass it if Mr. Garfield's
tactics prevailed. In order to respect
the necessity for the appropriations, Mr.
Kerr moved that all the Senate amend?
ments upon appropriations be passed
upon by the majority vote, except as to
the objectionable amendments, and that
these should take their chance of a two
thirds vote. Mr. Hoar made the point
of order that the House had no right to
adopt such a resolution, which Speaker
Blaine sustained.
"Mr. Beck then offered a resolution
which asserted that the objectionable
Senate amendment was unconstitutional
because inserted in an appropriation bill,
and that therefore it be returned to the
Senate. Every Republican voted that
the course was constitutional. The reso?
lution of course was lost, and the prece?
dent stands upon the parliamentary re?
cord.
"Mr. Garfield then pressed his resolu?
tion to a vote, but although the latter
stood 97 Republican yeas to 79 Demo?
cratic nays, the motion was lost because
two-thirds did not favor it. Other busi?
ness intervened, but when the morning
hour expired Mr. Garfield renewed the
conflict. Mr. Garfield moved to proceed
to the business upon the Speaker's table.
This was a motion that required only a
majority vote, and its object was to lay
aside measure after measure until the
civil appropriation bill was reached and
referred to a conference committee. Im?
mediately the Democrats commenced
dilatory motions, and alter six hours had
been wasted with them, Mr. Garfield
made an appeal to the House from what
he called the dead-lock, and moved to
non-concur in all the Senate amendments
and refer them to a committee of con?
ference with a recess until Monday morn?
ing, which was agreed to without a
division. Speaker blaine then appointed
Messrs. Garfield and Palmer, Republi?
cans, and Niblack, of Indiana, Democrat,
as the members of conference. During
the 'filibustering' it was repeatedly stated
that 'President Grant is going openly
into Congress to-day to press this bill for?
ward to its passage, and he is prepared to
force it through into a law by an extra
session if he fails to secure its enactment
to-day.'
"What occurred over Sunday was
stated the next morning by Mr. Kelly, of
Philadelphia, who with Farnsworth, of
Illinois, were the only Republicans who
opposed the arbitrary legislation in ques?
tion. The conference committees had
met and, of course with a Republican
majority upon them, had agreed to re?
commend the Seuate bill intact. But in?
asmuch as the rule had always been that
reports from conference committees were
subject to dilatory motions, no danger
was apprehended by the Democrats, but
to their surprise it was soon intimated by
the Speaker that he could hold the report
to be a privileged question. And accord?
ingly, when the House met on Monday
morning, the Speaker so decided and the
report was received. This brought Mr.
Kelly to an attitude of indignant elo?
quence, and he said:
"I move to recommit the conference
report. I make this motion under a deep
sense of responsibility. I am constrained
to make this by a proper sense of self
respect. The bill has attained in its
present state what, so far as my con?
sciousness is concerned, appears to be a
false pretense, characterized by all the
features of that offense which the law of
Pcunsylvania punishes. On Saturday
last the minority of the House, in virtue
of parliamentary law and the usages of
the House, not by the weakness of the
Republican party or of the members of
that party, held this bill in their power.
'Take from it one amendmeut aud you
may have all the rest without objection
on our part,' was said. Take from it one
provision and you may have your ad?
journment and appropriation. There
came on this floor a Senator, a member
of the conference committee, (Cole, of
California,) and he gave assurance to
gentlemen around me that if the bill
could go to a conference committee the
Senate would recede from that amend?
ment. It was known that he would be
chairman of the conference committee of
this House, and that he disapproved of
that amendment and had given open
and public assurance that he disapproved
of it as heartily as any gentleman on the
other side of "the House. There had to
be, according to parliamentary usage,
two Democrats on the conference com?
mittee?one from the House and one
from the Senate?and there would, there?
fore, it seemed to me and others, be no
possibility of the objectionable amend?
ment being adhered to; and land others
as radical as I am went not merely with
me, but in advance of me, to gentlemen
on the other side and said: 'The circum?
stances are such as to guarantee the with?
drawal of this amendment. You cannot
be deceived.' Nor yet did they yield.
They hesitated and inquired and did not
yield until from the Speaker's chair they
received the assurance that the report of
a conference committee was subject to all
the dilatory motions that any other mat?
ter was subject to. I had gono to them
meanwhile and iiad given them assurance
that if they lost position or power I
would co-operate with them in regaining
their lost power and their lost rights;
aud I make this motion in redemption of
my word. If it brings upon me condem?
nation 1 shall not heed that.
"Mr. Garfield said that he would not
speak as to the merits of the proposition
before the House, except to say that no
one regretted more than he did the fact
that the House had been brought to a
j dead lock on this question. The qucs
' tion which had arisen was far above the
I bill. It was whether the majority had
the right, and could insist upon their
right, to consider a great appropriation
bill the moment that any minority, how?
ever large, said no to that proposition.
If not, then they were in the midst of a
parliamentary revolution, out of which
there was no legislation of any sort pos?
sible forevermore until that proposition
was abandoned. He regarded it as most
unwise and unfortunate that the gentle?
men on the other side of the House had
seen fit to say that unless this amend?
ment were struck out this great public
measure, without which the government
could not go on, could not become a law.
He would never give way in any form of
compromise until that assumption was
utterly abandoned. He recognized the !
right of dilatory motions where a mi*'
nority was being oppressed by any an
parliamentary proceedings, but where j
the proposition was to proceed according
to parliamentary law, and where the mi?
nority said that should not be done, then
if the minority was to prevail there was
the end of parliamentary government.
It was a simple, plain denial of the right
of the American people to make laws,
speaking through the majority of their
representatives.
"Mr. Brooks made the suggestion that
the enforcement bill was unconstitu?
tional, and was proceeding to establish
that point by reference to the fourth
article of the Constitution, but was in?
terrupted by Mr. Bingham, who had ob?
tained the floor, and who insisted upon
proceeding with his remarks.
"An exciting scene ensued, during
which Mr. Bingham had to withdraw
offensive words and Speaker Blaine to
apologize, when the matter was recom?
mitted to the conference committee.
Several hours later Mr. Garfield, from
the reconvened conference committee,
reported an inability to agree and moved
a new conference. This was merely a
technical proceeding, but gave the Re?
publicans a way out of the dilemmas into
which the speeches of Messrs. Kelly,
Garfield and Biugham had placed them ;
and a new conference committee was
ostensibly appointed, but it consisted of
the former members of the first commit?
tee. Meanwhile the sessions of both
Senate and House had been prolonged a
few hours by joint resolution, and the
Republicans had agreed to take out the
enforcement clauses which the Senate
had inserted in the appropriation bill,
and the Democrats agreed to withdraw
'filibustering.' This left merely the Da?
venport amendments, with a withdrawal
from supervisors of the right to arrest
without warrants. Upon the new report
being presented, Mr. Garfield explained
it. He said:
"The efTcct of the proviso that super?
visors shall not have the power to make
arrests was that those officers should
stand by and witness any proceedings of
the election and should have the ollicial
right to do so, 80 that if frauds were per?
petrated the United States government
might have witnesses. In answer to a
question by Mr. Brooks, Mr. Garfield
stated that the supervisors of election
would have nothing to do officially with
challenging illegal voters or deciding
such challenges or with giving or with?
holding certificates of election or returns.
Mr. Kerr asked Mr. Garfield whether
there was anything in the enforcement
of the amendment which touched the
matter of the qualifications of electors.
Mr. Garfield replied in the negative and
said that there was nothing in it that
could touch or change the qualifications
of electors as now provided by law. Mr.
Niblack, the Democratic member of the
conference committee, made a statement
as to the enforcement amendment. He
had declined signing the report solely on
the ground of his objection to that
amendment as interfering with the Staes.
But the compromise reported was In; con?
fessed a mere sketch of the original Sen?
ate amendments. The supervisors pro?
vided for were to be mere official witness
to elections with no other power thau to
make complaint if the election laws were
violated. Although he was opposed to
the amendment in any shape he did not
feel justified in carryiuy on factious op?
position to it, but was disposed to let the
vote be taken on the proposition. He
believed that was the best policy, and he
said so frankly to his frieuds.
"Mr. Kerr said that he looked with
complete abhorrence on any attempt on
the part of the Federal government to
extend its jurisdiction over the conduct
of elections in the States, as he thought
it a most dangerous innovation in the
rightful power and jurisdiction of the
State. Still the amendment was so far
clipped of its dangerous influeuce and
power as that these additional super?
visors, in the language adopted, should
have no power or authority to do any?
thing except it be in the immediate
presence of the election officers, and to
witness all their proceedings, including
the counting of the votes and the making
a return thereof.
"Mr. Potter regarded the amendment
as unconstitutional, dangerous and un?
called for, but still he did not feel justi?
fied in resorting further to dilatory mo?
tions, but would submit to have the vote
taken and would record himself, as he
was most heartily against it.
"Mr. Holman undertook to initiate
dilatory motions, declaring that this was
the most fatal project ever brought be?
fore Congress and that it was infamous
in its character. He had not, however,
enough supporters to order the yeas ami
nays, only fourteen members voting to
order them.
"Mr. Garfield moved to suspend the
rules and vote immediately on the con?
ference report. Agreed to by 132 to 23.
"The conference report itself was then
agreed to?yeas, 102; nays, 79?a party
vote. It only remains to add to these
references to history that the same Gen?
eral Garfield who in 1872 so strenuously
insisted upon retaining amendments to
an appropriation bill is the same General
Garfield who is now leading the same
party on a platform that to repeal those
amendments in an appropriation bill is
revolutionary."
AnoL'T Gold.?It is now just thirty
one years since the grand discovery of
gold was made in California. During
that period there has been produced in the
States and Territories west of the Miss?
issippi River bullion to the value of ?1,
980,527,930. Of this amount aboat
$1,581,443,003 has consisted of gold and
$405,094,540 of silver. Besides this
there has been produced to date in the
several Alantic States, something like
$80,000,000, the most of it in North Car?
olina, Virginia and Georgia. If to this
be added the entire yield of British Col?
umbia to date $33,000,000, San Francis?
co receipts from the Northwest coast of
Mexico, $9,000,000, and the product of
the Atlantic States $30,000,000, we have
a total of $2,857,527,939 produced from
the above sources, all but 42,000,000 be?
ing from mines within the limits, of the
United States.
Delightful Bouquets.?Dn. PaiCE's
Concealed Delight, Pet Rose, Hyacinth,
Alista Bouquet, Ladies' Favorite, and
his other handkerchief perfumes, arc
truly delightful bouquets. They are cer?
tainly the most exquisite scents that can
be imagined?the odors of dainty buds
and rich blossoms.
"What Northern Men Say of the South.
This is a pamphlet of some sixty-three
pages, containing the proceedings of the
convention of Northern residents of the
South which assembled at Charlotte on
the loth of January. 1S79, at the invita?
tion of Mr. Dumont, of Charlotte, who,
in a most admirable and patriotic circu?
lar, inaugurated the assembling of these
Northern settlers to "speak the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth,"
as to the South, her people, her laws and
her resources. The pamphlet also con?
tains the proceedings of a second con?
vention held at Raleigh, on March 1,
1879.
The South, or rather the old residents
of the South, can but feel grateful for
the manifestation of the high sense of
esteem in which they are held by their
fellow-citizens from the North, who have
come to dwell amongst them. The
pamphlet contains also many varied and
valuable communications of Northern
settlers who were unable to attend the
convention at Charlotte. Truly these
communications touching the relations,
political, social and industrial, from
every part of t'ie South, should be of au?
thority among.'t good, well-meaning citi?
zens everywl.re in the broad Union.
Without knowing positively the social
relations of these Northern residents, we
were not prepared to see a relation of
the facts so creditabh to our people from
all directions. For we knew that owing
to the terrible misrule under which many
portions of the South have groaned, there
was in certain quarters more or less an?
tipathy existing to the live Yankee.
That our people should have mastered
this desire to inflict the wrongs they were
forced to endure, or. Northern settlers, is
highly creditable no less to the Southern
born portion of our communities, than to
the good sense and manliness of North?
ern residents.
Wc find much valuable information in
the pamphlet as to the varied industries
now existing in the South as well as the
vast resources awaiting the full advent
of progressive free labor. We presume
wc have to thank our contemporary, the
Charlotte Observer, at whose steam job
print establishment the pamphlet is pub?
lished, for the copy kindly furnished us.
We have only space this morning to
give the report of th 2 committee on reso?
lutions, consisting of: 1
Rev. Dr. Mattnon, President of Bitldle
University, Charlotte, N. C, formerly of
New York.
A. J. Curtis, of San Mateo, Fla., form?
erly of New York.
II. Coykendall, of Black's Station, S.
C, formerly of Des Moines, Iowa.
W. B. Middaugh, of Danville, Va.,
formerly of Pennsylvania.
H. D. Ingersoll, of Loudsville, Ga.,
formerly of New York.
To the People of the Several Common?
wealths comparing the United States of
America:
We, the representatives of Northern
settlers in the Southern States, and being
ourselves immigrants from localities in
the Northern States to the respective
States following our individual signa?
tures, in convention assembled, do call
your attention to the following, feeling
assured that cool judgment upon the
facts shown will set in flow the currents
of reason, and action w;U follow reason?
ing without prejudice. We prefer to
make findings specifically and at length,
and we find:
That in the States of our former homes
there exists an active prejudice against
the South and its people; that by it and
through it the conditions of the country
are largely disquieted; that it is foment?
ed and kept alive for ends ulterior to the
common weal; that the real interests of
the nation arc kept out of sight in keep?
ing alive this prejudice. That much of
this prejudice, if not all of it, is due
mainly to wrong information concerning
(and partial and total ignorance of) the
facts existing in a large portion of the
South.
That in the portion; of the South in
which we reside, the right of any man,
from no matter where, to express pub?
licly as well as privately his opinion
upon any subject and of every nature, is
nowhere and in no manner restrained.
That all laws are well administered and
as truly enforced against the wrongdoer
as in any part of any State of the Union.
That any man who has so conducted
himself at his former home as to win the
regard of honest men and decent people,
by pursuing the same course of life in
the South, does gain and keep the regard
and respect of all people, regardless of
any question of politics or religious faith ;
and we further find that being a North?
ern man is certainly no disadvantage.
That every citizen recognizes that he
is amenable to the lav,-, and that local
self-government is as much required and
encroachments upon these as much de?
plored as in any State North, East or
West.
We find, too, that persons foisted them?
selves upon the polity of the South, and
by their conduct cast discredit upon the
Northern name.
Those of us who were in the army of
the Union never for a moment pretended
to think of denying our uniform-or the
old cause. The Confederate soldier has
always evinced the true soldier instinct
in the grasp of those who were his ene?
mies in war.
That considering reputed outrages, if
these weie carefully sifted, it will be
found that the complainants for like acts
would have suffered at the hands of any
people under like provocation.
#****?
We find that no man is ostracised for
his opinions or on account of the laud of
his birth ; but, as elsewhere, for his bad
acts and dishonest failure to meet his
trusts and obligations. We find, too,
that it is a mistake to treat suspiciously
or to ignore the kindly offices of neigh?
borly friendship in all cases extended to
a stranger, and that sometimes persons
have repelled kindness and then com?
plained of being let alone.
We find that the Southern native ex?
pects Northern people to have notions
on politics and other topics different from
his, and views with as much contempt as
is elsewhere done any man who truckles
or toadies for simple gain.
We find that to the people of the other
sections of the United States the South
is an unknown land so far as relates to
knowledge of its soil, its climate, its
healthfulncss and its people. That it is
i libelled for partisan ends, and we present
this document in all conscience and
honor, to give honest knowledge and cor?
rect wrong reports.
In a document of this kind we cat .lot
give detailed figures of products per acre,
nor the yield per ton of ores, nor the
assay value of minerals, nor the monthly
thermal range for each point, nor many
other special facts, but we, each of us,
invite correspondence and will furnish
facts and figures regarding our several
localities on application.
To the truth of all this we pledge our?
selves and stand upon its truth by our
signatures hereto.
Here follows the signatures ef mem?
bers of the convention, from thirteen
original localities, viz.: New Hampshire,
1; Vermont, I; Massachusetts, 6 ; Con?
necticut, 1 ; New York, 21; New Jersey,
!?; Per ylvania, 15; Maryland, 3; Dis
trict of Columbia, 3 ; Ohio, 2 ; Michi?
gan, 1; Wisconsin, 1; Iowa, 2.?Colum?
bia Register.
Bill Arp's Sunday Chat.
Its a thrillin time when a country
family have invited their city cousins to
visit 'em, and are fixin up to receive 'em
in a hospitable mauner. My wife, -Mrs.
Arn, she were not at home and so the
girls took matters in charge, and for sev?
eral days the exciting episode went on.
It was like clearing the deck of a man of
war for a fight. The house has been
scoured, and scrubbed, and sand papered.
Fverything in it has been taken down
and put up again, and moved to a new
place, and I can't find anything now
when I want it. The old faded carpets
have been taken up and beated, and
patched all over, and curtailed and put
down again. They get smaller and
smaller, which they say, is a good wav
to wear 'em out without taking cold.
The furniture has been freshly varnished
with kerosene oil; the window glass
washed on both sides, and the knives and
forks, water buckets, wash pans, and
shovel and tongs brightened up. The
hearths have been painted with Spanish
brown, the family portraits dusted cas?
tors and spoons and napkin rings pol?
ished as fine as a jewelry store.
I surveyed the operations from day to
day with affectionate interest for it does
me good to see young poeple work dili?
gently in a meritorious cause: neverthe?
less my routine of daily life seems to be
somewhat demoralized. On the first day
our humble dinner was dispensed with
and me and the boys invited to lunch on
bread and sorghum at a side table. The
next day we were nllowed to lunch in the
back piazzer for fear we would mess up
the dining-room, and the next we were
confined to the water-shed to keep us
from messing up the piazzer and after
that I meekly prepared myself to be
showed out doors on a plank, but we
wasent. Ive been doing some more
work on the front yard to surprise Mrs.
Arp when she comes, but theyve locked
the front door to keep us from tramping
through the hall and we have to go
around about a hundred yards for a drink
of water. This is allcoreect I reckon for
theres no malice in it and they praise
up our terraces so gushingly Ive a mind
to keep on with em down into the pub?
lic road and cascade that to the branch.
Delicate hints have been given that it
ain't polite to set down to dinner with
one's coat off, or to drink coffee out of a
saucer, or eat hominy with a knife, or
smoke in the parlor. The wash bowl has
been turned upside down to keep us
from using it. With this side up it
holds about a pint and a half, and as I
was washing my face with the tips of my
fingers they surveyed me with looks of
unutterable despare. When I raise my
workin' boots on the banister rail for an
evening rest they wipe it oil' with a wet
rag as soon as I leave. I musent step on
the purty red hearth to make up a fire
or to put a back log on that weighs 50
pounds. Theyve put pillows on about
half as big as a bale of cotton and fringed
all round like a petticoat. They are to
stay on in day-time and be taken off at
night. Whem Im tired and feel the
need of a midday nap that bed was a
comfort, but the best 1 can do now is to
sit up in a chair and nod. The dogs
don't understand the new system at all.
Old Bows has been coming in the house
to the fire or lying in the piazzer for 14
years, and it does seem impossible to
break him of it in a sudden though dog?
matic manner. Broom-handles and fish?
ing poles move em out at one door, but
they slip in at another. Theyl enter an
appeal when Mrs. Arp comeR home. Im
waiting patiently for her advent myself,
but am going to conform to the new or?
der just as long as I can in reason.
Shed take care of me and restore my
ancient privileges. She never would
allow anybody to regulate me but herself,
company or no company. Shes over?
stayed her time two days trying to decide
what to buy with two dollars and a half.
Poor thing I I wish she had a hundred.
Id foller her about from store to store all
the day long. Then she wouldnt buy
nothing for herself but a pair of specks,
and she'd buy them on the sly, for she
dont want it generally understood she
has to use them. I woke up one night
about midnight and discovered her sit?
ting by the fire with my glasses on, read?
ing Molly Brown. Im reveliin now at
her delight, when she sees all the im?
provements that we have made in her
loug absence, for it seems like she has
been ofTto Europe, or Jeruselem, or the
Suez Canal. We've turfed all the ter?
races with blue grass sod. They run
round the form of a snake with two
crooks in him but which our poetic girls
speak of as Mr. Hogarth's line of beauty.
We've leveled off another yard for cro
kay ground; she loves to play some?
times, and it does me good to see her
throw the mallet after the ball when it
misses the wicket two or three times in
succession. She's is a comin'. The
flowers are waiting for her, and the
chickens and colts, and the dogs and
cats, and the children and me. We'erall
a waiting.
Bill Arp.
Evolution.
In 1824, Daguerre commenced experi?
menting. In 1839, he gave to the world
the process of making Daguerreotypes.
By patient industry, the art has evolved
into the perfect pictures of the present.
He who views the fast fading pictures of
his ancestors, and compares them with
the almost living and lasting photographs
of to-day must acknowledge an advance?
ment. If au advancement has been
made in photography and other sciences,
is it asking too much, simply because it
cannot be ocularly demonstrated, that
the doubts and uncertainties of Sir Ast
ley Cooper's time be set aside, and an
equal improvement granted in the science
of medicine? Must the ability of the
studious and experienced physician be
doubted, simply because the negligent
and inexperienced fail ? But a few years
since, the diseases and weaknesses peculiar
to women were regarded as incurable.
Now Dr. Pierce's Favorite Prescription
is sold under a positive guarantee to cure.
Ladies, if afflicted, and you wish to avoid
painful examinations and useless local
treatment, and employ a medicine that is
scientifically prepared; that is chemical?
ly pure, that is regularly graduated in
strength, and that will never disappoint
you in its action, use Dr. Pierce's Favor?
ite Prescription.
? On Saturday afternoon a young
heifer, owned by Mr. Ryan, gave birth
to one red calf and thirty-one monstrosi?
ties. Mr. Ryan described the monstrosi?
ties as about the size of large mice.
Their beads, legs and bodies resembled
those of calves, only there was no hair
upon them. The probable weight of
these unnatural animals was from two to
three ounces each. The red calf is liv?
ing, while the others were dead when
born. Mr. Ryan is one of our substan?
tial business men, and has the reputation
of being truthful and honest, so there is
no cause to doubt the above statements.
?Cor. Indianapolis Journal, 1
LEGAL ADVERTISING.-We are compelled fo
require cash payments for advertising ordered by
Executors, Administrators and other fiduciaries
and herewith nppend the rates for the ordinary
notices, which will only be inserted when the
money comes with the order:
Citations, two Insertions, - S3.00
Estate Notices, three insertions, - - 2.08
Final Settlements, five insertions - - 3.00
TO CORRESPONDENTS.?lit order to receive
attention, communications must )>c accompanied
by tho true name and address of the writer. Re?
jected manuscripts -Till not be returned, unless the
necessary stamps arc furnished to repay the postage
thereon.
Wc are not responsible for the views and
opinions of our correspondents.
All communications should he addressed to"Ed
Itors Intelligencer," and all checks, drafts, money
orders, Ac, should be made pavalde to the order
of E. I). MURRAY A CO.,
Anderson, S. C.
A CRUEL FATE.
General Slocum on th<> Murder of .Mrs.
Surratt.
General II. W. Slocum, one of the most
distinguished brigade, disvision, corps
and grand division commanders of tho
war recently delivered a lecture in
Brooklyn on events of the great struggle,
during the course of which he expressed
the opinion, always held by the Union,
that Mrs. Surratt was a murdered
woman. He said:
I am going to speak to you one word
about tho execution of Mrs. Surratt at
the close of the war, for I think some
good lessons can be learned from the
story of her trial and death. I believe
any people situated as we were ought to
be cautioned against placing implicit
confidence in evidence given at a time of
high excitement. I could stand here to?
night and relate to you fifty incidents
that would serve to caution everybody
against taking evidence against others
when the people were all in a state of
intense excitement. There never was a
day, there never was an hour, that I did
not believe Mrs. Surratt was as inno?
cent a woman as there is in this hall.
[Applause.] She was the keeper of a
boarding house in Washington. She
boarded Wilkes Booth and a naif dozen
other rebel sympathizers, and she had a
son, John H. Surratt. Wilkes Booth
was cuilty of shooting Mr. Lincoln, and
this poor woman was brought to trial in
connection with Wilkes Booth, and
through the excitement of the times her
neck was brought to the halter. Her
daughter, a young girl 18 or 19 years of
age, on the morning of the execution
went to the President's room and beg?
ged permission to say few words to him
on behalf of her mother, and a United
States Senator from our own State, who
acted as door tender, repulsed her saying,
"No, no; you cannot go in." Worse
than that, meaner than that, the poor
girl three or four years afterward married
a clerk in the Treasury Department.
No charges were made against him, but
because this clerk had married the
daughter of Mrs. Surratt he was dis?
charged. Let us brag of our achieve?
ments, but at the same time let us learn
to look our faults and errors squarely in
the face and acknowledge them whem
we have cause to."
The murder of Mrs. Surratt was tho
most cruel and cowardly act ever com?
mitted in any civilized country. It is
a curious and suggestive fact that all who
were responsible for the execution of
that innocent woman have felt the un?
seen hand of the Great Avenger. Stanton
Secretary of War, who was, perhaps, the
worst of the number, committed suicide
in a fit of remorse, although the fact was
sought to be concealed. Preston King,
the Senator from New York, who repul?
sed Annie Surratt from the President's
door, in like manner ended his own life
by deliberately jumping from a ferry
boat in the North River, at New York,
and drowning himself. Andrew Johnson,
who signed the death warrant and des?
potically suspended the writ of habras
corpus that had been granted by the
court, was stricken suddenly with death
upon his return to the Senate after he
had left the Presidency. Judge Advo?
cate Holt, who couducted the prosecution
long ago disappeared from public view
and whether dead or alive nobody knows
and nobody cares. And John A. Bing
ham, who assisted Holt, was driven from
Congress in disgrace as one of the Credit
Mobilier bribe takers, and sought relugc
in Japan, where, we believe he now is
?Rochester [N. Y.) Union.
Women Voters vs Kansas.?A
Hoosier sees in Kansas many new and
unfamiliar sights, but none more inter?
esting than that of the ladies voting.
They have the privilege of voting in all
matters pertaining to schools. As far as
my observation goes, the ladies here
have minds of their own. They neither
vote for the "handsomest man" nor the
one their husbands tell them to vote for,
unless the candidate is, in their own
opinion, the proper one. Their votes
can not be bought. They are universally
on the side of morality and temperance;
hence the workers in the cause are warm
advocates of equal suffrage. Election
days pass quietly. If there is any drink
irje; or fighting* done, it is not at the
polls. Everything is orderly there not?
withstanding contrary reports circulated
by anti-suffragists in the Eastern States.
Candidates keep carriages running for
the accommodation of the ladies, but
a great many walk up and deposit their
votes. As the result, so far, has been
very satisfactory, even to the men (the
brutes), it will probably be but a short
time until equal suferage is granted.
The gentlemen show their gallantry and
faith in the ability of the ladies by ap?
pointing them to office. The enrolling
clerks of the Legislature are ladies; also
a large proportion of the county super?
intendents, who, in every instance dis?
charge their duties in a manner that gives
universal satisfaction. We have in this
city among the ladies a physician, a
printer and numerous clerks, agents and
women carrying on business successfully
in various ways. One of them is a
barber, who supports herself and chil?
dren comfortably. Ladies are not so
plenty here as in Indiana. Perhaps that
is the reason they are so well respected
and protected. They are scarce enough
to be precious. In proof of which wo
often see advertisements for wives, by
some of the yountr men who took Gree
ley's advice some time ago, and now
have handsome farms and homes of their
own. I noticed in a paper a few days
since the offer of a fine horse to the per?
son who would assist the advertiser in se?
curing a "good, industrious wife."?Sali
na letter to Indianapolis Herald.
A Boy's Hard Sunday.?The head
of a boy about ten years old might have
been seen stickng through a picket fence
on Beaubien street Sunday evening as a
loud "yanhoo!" singal was given to
some one in the house. A lad of "there?
abouts" finally opened the door and
came out and asked:
"Is that you, Jim? What ycr
want?"
"I didn't see ye down where we was
riding on cakes of ice in the ship," re?
plied the other.
"I know ye didn't. This has bin the
hardest Sunday I ever put in on earth."
"Dad sick ?"
"No, dad's in Saginaw, but ma'm got
some gold in her lront teeth yesterday,
and she was bound to go to church to?
day if it killed her. I had to run all
over and borry things for her, and then
stay home and take keer of sis."
"Is it real gold, Jim?"
"I guess so, for she went in the morn?
ing, then in the afternoon, then to a
lecture, and she's now gittin' ready for
tho eveniu' sermon, an' practicin' on
showin' her three front teeth. I'm goin'
to run away as soon as grass starts."?
Free Press.
? Rowel, the English pedestrian, sailed
for home on the 1st, accompanied by his
attendants. Ae takes back about $19,
000, the champion belt, a valuable dia?
mond ring from a lady admirer, a dia?
mond scarf pin, a gold watch and chain
and other gifts.