The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, June 13, 1878, Image 1
v-,. r ?*/. .?'?.?V?. >r ^ ... ; .! ,;, ??h- . i ?> . -o-.' li'-ds > .wsf/* -orti:! ?-i>; .a-iiiLjjfjji^! !fc ..Ji?i*"?.rtH?(?y? nu .,m/!.{> ; _ 4<.,*^",l7jt:_i,1Jl lS,ir, ?Jch^?niril* > j ?nfc **? ?mit?* oj tono
oAfKt or suBSOfliPriox.-oxK DOWLAS
A?is*r'Cau$T* per annum, la advance. Tdd
Dolwi? et ?ad o?rear. BBTWTX-FIYI: Cern
,0gabirlptfon? ' are ?ot Uk? for a IMS period
tH?i ri.?*S!r*4J>r**TiaiVO.-Oao lV>U?rjwr
ol ore Inch for the ?r?tla?ertloE,modFlhy
?- no?r square for subs?quent Insertions UM thia
?hreo month?. Mo advertisement* co un I o Ira
*N'iSirs3 Mntraet? ?Ul be mwlewltu thowwUhln*
.J?VertUe for three, ela or twelve months. Ad
?rii<?D* by contract must be confined to tho im
??llstebuilneosof tho arm or IndlrV* ul contrao
iliBif.ittiary Notices exceeding av? Uocs, Tribales
?f BMuect. and all personal communications or
mitton o? UdiTlduaiTntereat, will bo charged for
.t advertising rates. Announcement* o? marring**
!n<t deaths, and notices of a religions character, are
;",p"tfullV solicited, and will be Inserted gratia
THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.
Tha ramona Sherman* Lotter ?ad the Sec
retary** Visit to Now OrVsana Inside His
tory of tko xVooJaiana Election.
Tbe examination of James E. Ander
son, Ute supervisor of the election in
East Feliciana Parish, Louioi.?"..-, re
vealed copies of letters which throw a
flood of light upon the election in thal
State. Tho production of a copy ol
Sherman's letter produced an unusual
sensation among the Republicans, and
took them completely by surprise. Io
order that our readers may have a cle&i
understanding of the equation, thodocu
mcntnry evidence furnished by Anderson
is herewith append jd.
Tbe following is a copy of the le'.tei
sent by Anderson and Weber to faber
men: * ' ."" <r' ? "?? \"
NEW ORLEANS, Nov.feO, 1870.
SIR : We have carefully considered tin
argumenta advanced by you in our inter
view. Your assurance ??bat we shall ot
taken care of is scarcely specific unoagh
in case we pursue the course suggester
by you, we would be obliged to leave tin
State. Will yon. therefore, state in writ
ingwhowe sholl look to for the fulfill
ment of tnose promites f B^pcctfully
D. A, WEBER,
JAMES ANDERSON.
Ho:?. JOHN SHERMAN.
The following is a copy of the repl;
made by Sherman :
NEW ORLEANS, NOV. 20, 1876.
GE NT i.KM KN . Your note of even dat
bas just been received. Neither Mi
Hayes, myself, the gentlemen who ac
company me, nor the country at larg?
can ever 'forget the: obligatiouo undo
which j ou have placed us, should yo
stand ?rm in the position you ha?
taken. . ' j
From a long and intimate acquaintanc
with Gov. Hayes, I am justified in assun
ing the responsibility for promises mad?
and will guarantee that you will be pr<
vided for . na aoon after tho fourth <
March as may be practicable, and in sue
manner as will enable you both to lea*
Louisiana should you deem it necessar;
Very truly yours,
JOHN SHERMAN.
The following correspondence was ab
brought out in the examination of Ai
demon on Saturday. The opening letti
was forwarded in July last to the Ne
York .-Stn, inclosing copies of the for
goinm toffAi-a and thi* ess or* *"ina 1 lette
written by Anderson. The possession <
this evidence bas induced the consta!
effort? of the Sun to have an investig
tion of tho frauds in Louisiana;
Letter from Jamas E. Anderson, (und
fictitious initials):
NEW ORLT?ANB, July 2, 1877.
Sm: D. A. Weber and James ?. A
?cr&on were respectively supervisors
East Feliciana Parish during the li
election. Some time during the ps
winter Weber placed a sealed envelo
in the hands of a gentleman of this ci
for safo keeping. This envelope w
opened by mistake and found to contai
amoug other things, the following doc
menta ; which, taken iu rotation of dat
form an interesting inside history oft
last election ?rt Louisiana. Weber w
kil'sd'is Marcii csa Anderson I- SOT?
Washington. Preserve the lettr-s j
closed, as they may bs needed fur futt
use. i, W. B. F,
Letters from Anderson to Weber:
CUNTON, LA., Sept. 10,1876
DJEA?JW; Aaa fe receipt of ye
letter. Everything ia. coing smootl
with me. The Democrats are eatisf
with my official course-more *o tb
the Republicans. Payne, my Democra
clerk, is a well-educated gentleman, a
his selection shows that tha'Democr
mean nothing, more than to have af
deal, and that I propose to give thc
As for Butler-well, he ia hell on I
end of a poker, and no ia more.of a m
tery to me to-day than when I first ca
up. J. P. Harris has been here looki
after Packard's interests. He says
must return 1,000 majority from t
parish. If you were to rake this pat
with a fine-tooth comb you could
find that number of Republicans, (
how they expect me to return more o
Republican majority than there are :
publican votes is a problem I bavo as
failed to solve. Any D?formation :
can give me on the subject will be grt
fully received. It is simply imposai
to organize our party in thin pari
Powers, Da Gray, Butler* Campbell i
-company ewear>rthey trill have norh
to do. with it unless tho niggers.are b
in the background, and tho.darkies
equally..ita 'eniyudtJc' in assorting t
they will not ufBllate with the ab
named individuals, alleging that t
are bull-dowrs; and so ic goes;. In
meantime, the Democrats aro thoroug
organised, and are working like beav
You1 can say1 to E. L. that tho majo
against him. will bo about 1,203;
very condoling,''tis true, but ucvuriht
'tis true. What is the prospect in V
F.? My impression is thst we will
this State, but Hayes will go through
ask nothing more. Yours, J. ET ?
D.A.W.
. OLO?TON, Oct., 12,187
DEAR DON: Will leave on Batu:
for Nev? Orleans. Have sent .my. rt
nation to Kellogg,, Tho parties wh<
tacked mo on Saturday night havo
ried,their point from tho fact that
Democrats have unwittingly aided tl
and I shall leave tho pariah. Wt
backed by moro thau my suspicion
this matter, I might pursue a diffc
course. ! ' 1 will yet tvti at the botto;
the whole matter. I think I know
one of my assailants was and the mo
that actuated him. WiU write you
. I_ . .??-?--. ? ??
.?? v v?vv . * usn wj . .? ?
D. A. W.
NEW ORLEANS, Oct.-29,181
MT DEAR DON: I am in rece i j.
yours of the 25th instant. The vt
trouble here lies in tho fact that!
exista a conspiracy, the object bel
hold no election in East Feliciana,
to throw, the onus of tho affair oe
shoulders. Kellogg has refused to ai
my resignation, at tho same timon
ing. the Dem?crata that he desire!
rt-turo. Ac. Thu white-livered econ
has hi .-3d L. B. Jcnki to dog my
steps, and should I attempt to
would undoubtedly be arrested on
trivial pretext, i'll beat the whole c
yet, damn them. Of course aotfc
can say vriH convince the Democrat'
I am bot in thia arrangement, and t
too, am to be made a victim. I t
however, that on election day yoi
frVi me, in East Feliciana, and ?
teach Kellogg that there is ma?y i
Ac I ara convinced that Packer
no hand in ihig'dtlair, but am in
as to E., L. Packard and Campbell
always favored the Organisation <
party in tho parish. They haye als
ceded that the Democrats would, ct
by a heavy majority, and baves
desired to cut down that majority as
sa pousiblc-. Dr. Gray has always OF
this, and advocated no election ort
lng out the pariah, und in this J
h?c? seconded by Kellogg, Jewel
others. They are likely to advoca1
f-irry out any plan tiny may ace t
niay the devil take rae if I allow tl
Kiddle tho Mams- on mr. Tom
and tny*vlf will bc up in go.nl
There will be no Repuoucan tic
thc field, sod w?^quenuy f?rv, ?
Republican Totee cast. This, I think,
will ho their programme, as it will give
them & case. Tho Democrats will un
doubtedly poll about 1,600 or 1,600 votes,
and if, as yu say, they carry Wost Feli
ciana by 600 majority, E. IV? game is
cooked. Of coursa he cannot overe?me
such odds in Pointe Coupes. When I
return I shall stop at my old place, No.
144 Custom House street. Come around
as soon as you arrive. Find out who
those damned niggers were that came
over from your parish that night and
whether they were in sympathy with
their leader in his efforts to kill me.
Truly your fr? nd, J. R. A.
D. A. W. -
NEW ORLEANS, Nov. 14,1875.
DEAR DON : Meet me on royal street
at ll o'clock. Packard is raising bell
over your refusal to protest. Morgan
I bas io!'owed me like a shadow since my
return. Am in doubt as to whether he
hos been employed by the Democrats or
Republicans. I think be is playing into
tho bands of Loth. In car? he. is frith
me, do not atop, hut gu io Crops', and 1
I will follow as as soon as possible. Tnere
is no doubt but they have changed my
statement so as fo make it an intimida
tion protest. Pitkin refuses to show it
to mo. Make up your mind as to what
we had bet??r do. J am opposed to doing
their damned dirty work, even to save
Kayes, If we pull together and expose
the whole thing, Pitkin. Kellogg, nell
and the returning boara combined can
never carry this State for Hayes. Should
wc go with the right, it H ill give us i
reputation and standing that woulrj
otherwise require years to acquire. Ai
wo are hut boys yet, I incline to what ii
juet in the premises, and trust to th<
I future for our T/rard. ''.ours,
J. E. ANDERSON.
NOVEMBER 17,1876.
DEAR DON : Since answering P.'s let
ter yesterday giving Burke's proposition
I have thought that possibly I migh
have put roy foot in it. It is very powl
bio bo may be a spy or an actor and hi
letter a blind. However. I said nothim
that could criminate either of us ; merci;
stating that I had - given Burke tho in
formation os he requested and Burke'
reply. I otntod, however, that in case h
ear/ you, to show you my letter and asl
your advice os one here acting in accord
No doubt it will bring him to the cit?
and should ho call act carefully,
doubt if he is ?b!? to "rubstantiate hi
statements, and I v.ouid not give a coe
tinenta! for them unless he can. Ha?
you learned anything .about the big
I joints? They are cursing me heavily
and assert that I have sold out and ax
going to Montalda to night WU! me:
you at ll sharp, if there is anything nev
A "VT ^"pe/tW
NOVEMBER* 20,1876?
MY DEAR SIR : Como around to m
house this morning. I am not satisflei
and have no more faith in Shermai
Matthews and company than 1 have i
Pitt Kellogg. Unless we get a writte
?uarantee that we shall Lie taken care c
am unwilling to go a step furthe
Como about 10 o'clock. As to-, ]
will bo out hy that time. We ought
eeo Sherman ?gaf? and insist on a wri
?c" r'-'-*rsp.tee. ? .' Yo?re tr?!?.
ANDERSON.
Letter from Anderson to P. C. Butlc
.of East Feliciana:
? CUSTOM HO??S, NEW ORLEANS, L;
COLLECTOR'S OFFICE, NOV. 16,1876.
MY DEA* SIR : Yours of tho ll th w
H certainly a surprise I thought I fe!
I comprehended the capability of that ii
Eression. I have suspected ?nat yi
new ?nore - of certain affairs than y<
I cared to tell. I made no protest agair
I the returns-simply a statement of wh
H really occurred and what cam^ under n
? observation. The parish will be ;hrov
H out, and nothing I could have done
H can do will prevent it. Had you co
! Med in me before, we fright togetfa
\ havo accomplished . -mcthi..^. As it
? there '? no nae in butting my he
against a stone wall. I disliked tue id
ot making overtures to the Dembcra
I and was at cea as to what action to ta
H in regard to your request To-day Maj
I Burke sent for me and stated they wt
? desirous of savin? tho parish and ask
? what assistance J? could give him a
? what I wanted. I repeated your sta
H ment verbatim save as regards Packa
? which is too incredible to make uuh
? strongly corroborated. I did not, ho
? ever, mention your name, and left hi
I uuder the impression that I would sc
H stantiato the St?ter* ont made. He i
? fered me $4,000 a.-.d aa $1,800 positi
for four years. Your fears that y
? would bo obliged to leave the State
I ease you made the exposure, I think, i
I groundless.1 Tho people would ovcrlc
I your complicity in their joy at the res
I which would probably follow. But i
mitting that yeti must leave, I think t
I amount, together with the positi
I would give you a fal? start in any par?
I the country. 'Should you accept, wi
I te Burke-notify me also, sod I shall <
Elain the matter to him. Had you ;
etter come to the city ? Let me vu
H you against one thing : Do not make 1
H attempt nnleas yon have document
I evidence to prove your assertions.
H you have oimply heard Dick instr
H Tom and Harry to perform'some pico
? rascality, do not attempt to prove it
? the evidence of the latter. They j
? swear that nothing of the kind ever
? curred, and you will be regarded a
? falsifier. That is where the shoe pine
? me. Why, contd I prove all I kn
? some Of these detectable scound
? would be enjoying the hospitality bf
Baton Bongo Penitentiary instead
? running the State government of Lor
? to come up. I don't think that elia
? would be beneficial to me, especial!)
I this period.
? May the devil *ako the day X cons
I ed to go to East Feliciana. Let me l
? from you soon. Take no steps witl
I consulting me. I am anxious to bi
I down these rascals, but there is no tte
breaking our necks unless we can soc
? pl iah something. Should yon see D
I Weber, show him this letter and con
? with ulm.- Wo are acting toge!
I Truly yours,
? . JAMES E. ANDKRSO:
The following letters from Sta:
I Matthews wen; produced by the witn
? Agreement between Anderson
I Na?h, F^presentative i;n Congress, j
I Orleans, November il, 1876}, . ? ?
? Hy an agreement entered, into this
I between baines E. Anderson, Super
? of Registration for the pariah of East
brians, Louisiana, ftuti Charles E. fl
i--cw\ , of Congress from toe Sixth <
? greaaionat' District of Louisiana, j
I agreed that ?aid Anderson shall BP^I
I evidence she^ng that the said puns
? EaM Feliciana waa fairly carried by
? D?mocratie party at tie election
I NoTembar 9,1876, thereby electing
I entl rV Democratic Staie ticket and.
I gressmeii, in consider*.tiou of which
I aawNaah agrees to seciire for ?dd
I dcrton tho position of naval officer a
I port bf New Orleans, La.
? (Bunted) JAMES E. A:
? C E. N
The above agreement was ?gni
I our presence, this 2lst day of Novel
I 18'? r ,'? rrv?l?d
? (Bigned) u ? MOROAK
I ?
Letters fro ra Stanley Matthews to An
derson :
MB. ANDERSON"* Yon are at liberty to
use the note on the other page aa an in
troduction to General Harlan, who is
one of the commission, and you can talk
to him as freely at to me. You should
say to Nash, if inquired of, that I hare
the agreement,
(Signed) STANLEY MATTHEWS.
CINCMHATI, March 29, 1877.
General J. M. Harlan.
DRAB SIB : This will be presented fo
you by Mr. James E. Anderson, who may
desire to communicate with you oonfiden
Hally. Yours truly,
STANLEY MATTHEWS.
WASHINGTON, April 17, 1877.
DEAR SIR : I had an f aterviow to-day
with tho Secretary of Siaio in reference
to your appointment as consul a' Callao,
the place you desired. Unfortunately,
the Secretary is already under such com
mitments in reference to that appoint
ment as to make it impracticable to grat
ify your present wishes. ? I have, how
over, the bett reason? Tor saying.'sooner or
later, and as soon as practicable, I shall
be able-to obtain, for you a satisfactory
appointment. Keep me potted from 'time
to time of what you may have in respect to
placet you would Hie to have and feel com
petent to fill, io that I can better repre
sent yonr winne*. Yours truly, r
STANLEY MA?THEWS.
To JAMES E. ANDERSON.
CINCINNATI, April 27, 1877.
Wv nam SIB: I have *our fa ver ot
22d instant, and I hav? ateo conferred
with General Harlan, having traveled
with him from Hiloda here, arriving last
night. 1 The General told me he had as
certained at the State Department that
thc consulate at Tientsin had already
some time since been disposed of. We
both concluded it would be better to
wait until the extra session of Congress,
which will be called to meet June 4,
when I will be in Washington regularly,
and situated so that I can give the atten
tion to your application which I have
premised, and when I do not doubt X
will be able to secure your appointment
to some foreign .position which will be
agreeable, to you. Yours truly,1 .
STANLEY MATTHEWS.
To JAMES ANDERSON, ESQ., New Or
leans.
CINCINNATI, May 7, 1877.
MY DEAR SIB i l enclose letter tx
Gos. Thoraui C. Au?eison, asking his in
fluen?a in favor of your , appointment ai
deputy collector, in answer to yours o
the 5th instant, just received. Let m
hear from you at io the. result. Your
truly, STANLEY MATTHEWS.
JAMES E. ANDERSON, ESQ., New Or
leans.
/-?-.- If._ m , C\r,rt
vinuinnAii, luajr ?j iori.
MY DEAR SIR :1 The appointment o
Mr. James E. Anderson as one of th
three deputy .collectors or other plac
satisfactory to him in the custom hons
at New Orleans I would regard es in th
interest of the publio service, a deserve*
[recognition of n?itcrvites and a persona
?favor to myself. M?yr I venture to as
?our personal influence in itt favor
Toura truly, STANLEY MATTHEWS.
GEN. THOMAS C. ANDERSON.
StssUy. Matthew* ta.Sectary Bran
recommending Anderson :
CINCINNATI, May 1-L.1877.
MY DEARSIR : The bearer, Mr. Jami
E. Anderson, of New Orleans, is the get
tieman ja reference .to whom, when la
iisi Washington, I had x% private eonve
cation with you, urang bia, nppuintinci
to a conaulanip. Mr. Anderson has ha
until now a subordinate clerkship in tl
custom house at New Orleans,'which hi
{always been unsatisfactory to him, nc
i now his residence there nus become ?
,unpleasant that ha has abandoned it ac
bia clerkship. The ?ircu instances i
.which Mr. Anderson His been place
?and in which he has been compelled I
?act a very difficult part are such as 1
?give him very strong claims upon the a<
iministratioh in the publio interests, ar
j I do most earnestly urge that some sati
?factory public employment may bo four
Ifor him at once. Very truly, '?
STANLEY MATTHEWS.
Stanley Matthews to Anderson :
j CINCINNATI, May 25,1877.
MY DEAB SIB : I received yuur tel
gram to-dayv;and/very ranch regret- y<
arefuofc satisfied with tho apnobjtnte
tendered' yoii, and which : by tho pepe
I this momlng, I understan d was the co
isolate at Funchal. I am really at a k
to know vhai further to do. I ara qui
willing to do anything you may sugg<
that gives promise-reasonably of sueco
Did you see, Mr. Eva rta personal!
Write to ike nnd explain 'everything f?ll
and let me know what you think, I c
'.further do to serve you. Yours trul
STANLEY MATTHEWS.
JAMES E. ANDERSON, Esq., No. 73
: street, Washington City.
Telegrams ana letters from Anders
tc Stanley MiitthcT.s :
WAirtmoToir, June 7, ?877.
i Hon. Stardav Matthew?, Ci?sii?nati: ?
The Presidoat claims to have rec?i?
no letters. Want no more corrcspor
ence and no ?nore nonsense, Come he
and arrange this affair or you can all fe
the music. Telegraph ms at once. Ci
nothing about documents in yonr p
session. ANDERSON
Juno 27
MY DEAR SIB: General Smith i
given me the text of your letter. I hi
nothing further to ask at your hands,
of the monumental fraua who occup
tho White House, beyond Ja return
those documents. A refusal r.n yt
part to return them will justify mo
publishing (and I Will publish) your 1
tera in the statement I propose to nu
.liAuini. KAW T/Vniaiprin wu r-nrr?cu?
Hayes." I shall remain here until Frit
next, if I do not hear from you by tl
time, I promise you shall hear from
before the Ohio election.
To HON. STANLEY MATTHEWS,^
glnia.
WASHINGTON, June 19,187?
MY DEAR SIB : When any ward bi
mer, shoulder-hitter, Ac., who can
no other position, mutt be provided
in a seaport city, they are Riven a p
ttou as Inspector Of customs.' The ht
aro from G c. m. till 6 p. m. ; tho dui
tri stand Under a broiling sun and 1
vent rascally sailors from smoggl
The pay amounts to from $1,095 to !
400 per annum. This is the p?tition
feted me by General Smith. I h
told him, politely, of course, that he
take the position, and go to the d<
He has no time to attend to my want
account pf the outside rush, so 11
withdrawn from the contest and a
now proceed. to get satisfaction in
own way. If you desire to retain nu
documents given yon yon eau do sa
think it better you should, ax,by di
so it Will leave you out of future con
cations. You can use yonr own j
ment, however. In my event, you c
hear' from me.before the October i
tiona. I shall be in Philadelphia foi
week. You can address mo there
that period. Very truly yours,
JAMES E. ANDERSO
Philadelphia, Pa., care of J. R.Sy|
Attorney at Law.
! lido. STANLEY MATTHEWS.
?LI Stanley Matthews to Jame* Ander
[IIn-tonal and Confidential.)
UNITfiD GTATfc* SB*AtE CHAMBER,
WABUnroTOJi. Feb. t?. 18",
MY DEAR SIR: I havo your note of
yesterday, and in reply beg to eay that ?
do not recollect the suggestions hereto*
fore made by you to which you refer,
and which you thlutr, if adopted, might
atill prove advantageous to the public in
terest, and I would be glad to hear your
report. I have never been subjected to
so much misrepresentation in regard to
everything I have.undertaken to do, that
I do not think it wor?M he tows for mn to
go to Philadelphia ?? Baltimore ?br the
purpose of meetiug you. In case you
should find it convenient to be in Wash- (
ington / shalt be pleated to tee you.
Yours truly, STANLEY MATTHEWS.
MB. JAB. E. ANDERSON, Philadelphia.
A LEAF FEO M HISTORY.
The Bayonet Er? tn the South Carolina j
tttate Hoaaa,
In the course of bis speech on the Ar
my bili delivered in the House Of Rep
resentatives a few days ago, the Hon.
Minen I. Southard, of Ohio, introduced
?orne vory interesting telegrams and tes
timony relating to the dark days of 1877
in Columbia. We copy this portion of
his remarks from the official report in !
the Congressional Record :
On the 14th of October, 1876, this tel
egram was seut by Gen. Sherman to Gen.
Buger, who had previously been trans
ferred to Columbia, South Carolina :
HEADQUARTERS OF THE A TOY,
_W ABBINGTON, Oct. 14, 1876. ?
io ueo. ituger, Columbia, S. G. :
We are all back from California. If
you want anything, say so. I want all
measures to originate with you. Get
along with the minimum force necessary,
but you shall have all we can give if 70U
need them. W. T. SHERMAN,
General.
On the 16th of October Gen. Buger
answered that telegram, as follows :
COLUMBIA, S. C., Oct. 16,1876.
To Gen. V.. f. Sherman, Washington :,
Think I have troops sufficient unless
circumstances change. Have ni ?ateen
companies in the State now in stations
of one to four companies. Have some
companies still in reserve. No special
disorder has occurred cinco Ellenton riot
last month. If I need more troops will
ask for them. I ohall be here to-day.
RUDER, j
Notwithstanding that telegram from I
Qc~. Buger, in which he said that all I
was peaceful and quiet there, and that if
he needed more troops he would call for
them, and without further information,1
; the very next morning a proclamation >
waa issued by President Grant, from,
? Washington City, declaring South Caro
lina in insurrection, and there followed
numerous telegrams from the general of '
the army, ordering all tbs troops front I
tho Atlantic coast from the extreme;
?North to as far South aa Fortress Monroe,,
?into the State of South Carolina. Here
'is a specimen of the telegrams sent:
HEADQUARTERS OF THE ARMY,
WASHINGTON, Oct 17, 1876. .
?To Gen. W. 8. Hancock, Commanding
Military Division Atlantic :
It will be necessary to reinforce Gen.
Huger to the maximum possible, and ws
may have to order every available man.
from the North Atlantic posts.
Acknowledge receipt
W. T. SHERMAN, General.
'? In cbcJiGr.cc to ?hcj& Of dexa vom
Washington, all available forcea were
cent into South Carolina and other South
??'11 States 1?Uder pr?icucs cf pressuring
.order, but with the purpose and effect ot
ti carrying the election. Actual military
i possession waa taken of those States, ana
tho elections were controlled in violation,
?bf the Constitution of your country, in
I violation of law, and in violation of
every principio of justice and right,
i ' Not only that ; it did not atop there ;
military possession Of those Slates was
continued until long after the elections.
!Tha Legislature cf South Carolina was
organized, not by the members who were
: elected to it, but by tho Administration
herein Washington through tho uso of
Federal troops. I hold here in my hand
tho official telegrams relating io that or
ganization. There was a dispute about
certain members from Edgcfield and
.Laurens who held tho certificate of the
Supremo Court; they wore to be ejected.
Gov. Chamberlain sent this telegram to
Washington City:
COLUMBIA, S. C., Dec 1,1876.. I
Hon. J. D. Cameron, Secretary cf War,,
Washington :
i Cannot Eoge?eld and Laurens men be
removed? ,Taey are now acting as mem
bers, and have no credentials. If they
are removed the House can act and or
der be restored. Cannot we ba protected
against unlawful intrusion, when we
have no power to enforce the exclusion t
D. H. CHAMBERLAIN, Governor, j
Then followed a telegram from the
attorney-general *o Gov. Chamberlain,
sad: sis? ono to Gen. Roger, from the
Secretary of War. Here they nra :
. WASHINGTON, Dec. 2,1876.
? Gov. D. H. Chamberlain, Columbia, 8, O:
, Tho President thinks that you should
exercise ymir own resources as Goverbo-.
in behalf of the Legislature which you.
; have recognized by assisting it to purga
itself bf unauthorized persons..
If you are resisted in thia Gen. Ruger
has been instructed to enforce your au
thority. ALPHONSO TAFT,
Attorney G?n?ral.
WAR DEPARTMENT,
WASHINGTON, D. C.. Dec 2,1876.
To Gen. T. H. Buger. Columbia, &.G.i
The 'Governor of. the State of South
Carolina should exercise bia own resour
ces- to purgo the Legislatura which he
has recognized of unauthorized persons.
your duty to enforce his authority.
J. D. CAMERON, Secretary of War.
Subsequently the following telegrams
were sent in relation to the same subject :
EXECUTIVE MANSION,'^
I WASHINGTONCITY, Dec. 8, ?S76.
Gen. T. H, Rug?r, Columbia, S. C. :
Fearing your instructions maybe con
flicting and leave you in doubt as to your
duties in tho present unhappy condition
rof affairs in ?outh Carolina, I wish io
I say this : Governor Chamberlain is the
legal constituted Governor of the State,
and remains so until the Legislature
canvasses the vote and installs nia suc
cessor;, and he is entitled as such to
your support and protection. It .is a
civil duty to organise the Legislature
devolving on Slate authorities. : Ali you
can do is to prevent unauthorized per
sons' from forcibly interfering with the
Governor and other authorized officer*
ia the performance of their duties. To
be pialo, I want to avoid anything like
an unlawful use of the military, but It
will be entirely right to sustain tho Gov
ernor, or any of bia agents br officers, in
tho performance of any duty in connec
tion with the Legislature if interfered
wirb by outsiders whilo in the perform
ance of that duty. U. S. GRANT.
COLUMBIA, 8. C., Dec 5,1876.
To Hon. J. P- Cameron, Socretary of
War, Washington, D. C. ?
Gen. Roger announces this morning
that he virfll no longer guard doors of
Sute House. The city ia filled wUh
armed and violent men.- There is great
er need than ever before of protection of
State House.. Specific ornera must be
eent- tespecUng thU matter Stocco, In
. 1 1 .' j---'.?
order to avert riot and bloodshed. Va*
dilation hero now is roost unfortunate.
; Please ananer. AU X ask hi that State
Houso be protected against violence.
D. H. CHAMBERLAIN,
Governor of 8outh Carolina.
WAR DEPARTMENT,
WASHINGTON CITY, Dec. 0,1876.
To Governor D. H. Chamberlain, Co*
lumbhvS. C. :
I General Auger's instructions are to
Eotect the Legislature from ali outside
terference, and those instructions will
repeated.
J. D. CAMERON,
Secretary of 'Var.
I hold in my hand tho official testimo
ny taken in relation to use of troops at
the Presidential election before a special
committee Of the last Congress, of which
the honorable gentleman from New York
(Mr. Wood) was chairman and i was a
member. The publication of this testi
mony could not bo obtained at the time,
but I have lt as it was written. In it I
find the testimony of Gen. Ruger in plain
and unmistakable terms that he construed
these telegrams to bim to mean that the
Laurens and sedgefield members and tho
.other conservative !*>08?bersof Ibo South
Carolina Legislature were the "unauthor
ised persons." And he interpreted these
telegrams aright, for they could have no
otbtr significance ; and accordingly be
took steps to enforce these orders. The
telegrama and the testimony of General
Tin m?.* T will inc. rh in mt? remarks.
I (len. Rug?r sent word by his orderly
to the Legislature of South Carolina,
after the two houses convened tn the hall
bf the SUte House, Ullidg the Conser
vative members. that they must not be
there at 1% o'clock on the next day. In
obedience' to that order they Withdrew,
?and having withdrawn, a committed
waited upon Gen. Buger, and asked bim
If these members would be permitted.to
return the next day, and he told them
that they must not go back. Here Is the
testimony of Gen: Roger :
! Question. Did you give Gov. Cham
berlain any assurance that you would aid
his force in excluding anybody at tba!
time frdni the hall of the House? 1
mean While the two Houses were in ses
sion together.
Answer. X bsd some orders in refer
once to that subject, but I gaveGovernoi
Chamberlain no auch S-osuranie?, prior t=
receipt of auch orders, that I would nu
in excluding any members.
(i. What orders did you have ?
; A. I think you hare the telegrams. -
j Q. At a still later period than that dh
you make some order in reference to tb
exclusion of certain persons from th
houso?
I a A ... --:?.- tUj. rt--.:_
*~ v. .uw vwunci f AVIV
Legislature catted upon me and submit
ted certain propositions in writing ; Id
bot recollect now exactly the words, o
perhaps , the substance, but they askei
that they should be permitted to occup
the hall as the legally constituted Legh
lature, I told them that if their bod
went tb the ball for the purpose of entoi
ing there as the lower House of the Leg
islaturo they would not be permitted t
enter, that is, that if they were refuse
ft'?ra??sio!? by the civil officers or th
civil gdards ht tho door, and if the doo:
keeper should call upon the militai
officers there to prevent their forcibla m
trance or assist' in doing BO, the office
would prevent lt. That was after thc
had gone out in the first place and whe
'they proposed to go back, but they di
not go back.
Q. What authority did you have <
for what reason did you make that orde
j A. My reason for it was the inst ru
tiona which I bad and my undersUndirj
of my duty under thc ctrcumstan't
Governor Chamberlain called upon u
before that for assistance in cuforcir
the authority of the Speaker, I thin'
?He made a verbal application, and alto
ward modo an application in writing tl
same day. That was, I think, on tl
80th of November. I bad declined, an
bad reported tho sta to of the case i
Gen. Sherman, and the dispatch which
received in reply to that waa that I
(tho Governor)'should exercise his uv
resources to purge the Legislature 1
had recognised of unauthorised percor
and in ease be Was resisted that I sbou
assist him. I think those Were the wor
or substance.
Q. That was in reference to the mei
bera from Laurens and Edgefield Cou
ties?
A. I presume so. I had also, befo
that application by the committee of tl
Conservative House, received adiopat
to prevent unlawful interference with t!
Legislature by ouloidera.
Q. You left it to him to decide whi
was the lawful Legislature ?
A. I considered that tho ether, that
tbs one called tho Conservative Hou
should be cla???? M nntaidera. I did c
assume anything as to the legal sUti
but I considered it within the intent
my orders that X should support the s
thority Of the Governor.
Q. I thibk yon did bot quite liol
your statement as to your answer to t
committee that waited upon you.
A. The substance of it was? that
thoy appeared there, as proposed, for t
Surpose of occupying the hall of <
[ouse of Representatives, and if tb
were refused admission by tho persons
the door-the State constables or pers<
having charge aa doorkeepers-and su
persons should call on the officers
command of the troops at the St
House far assistance to prevent their <
trance, it would be hts duty under
orders to give it. If they were gran
admission, of courts I should not hi
prevented their entry.
In response to a question whether G
Roger had not sent his orderly to
eludo tho Conservative mcmbora wi
both parties Were lu tho hall, he said:
A. I did at one time send word
Speaker Wallace by Maj. Maginni* t
st twelve o'clock tho next day the mi
bera from Laurens and Edgefield sho
.or must not be there. My impress
waa that the Legislature would adjo
that evening, ana that when they ct
back at twelve the next day these ra<
be? should not come. But that 1
nothing to do with the application by
Governor. Several gentlemen had b
to see ms before that, and had as
whether I should give orders to exel
the members who had certificates sig
by the Secretary of State or pre\
their entering the ball. I said thi
should not. They asked if I would
that tho members who bad certifie
from the Supreme Court might go io
said I would not consent That wc
have brought up a new subject, at
did uot know what it might call foi
also: I did not regard ; it within my
thority. I was told by tbeae gentla
that tho members who had the car ti fi
from th? Secretary of Qi?i? would p
ably go to the hall; and when I hi
that tho Conservative Houso had {
up and taken possession of the ba
thought that I bad not been fairly ti
ed. T suppose that Mr. Wallace kne
this conversation.
. Q. While the two bodies were in
House t**gi?*;'?.cr/. and whilo tho
Speakers were on the stand, was i
sent ty you to Mr. Wallace, tho Spat
that ct it o'clock the sexl day thc 3
rena and Edgefield members munt not be
there T
A. I do not remember that I said that
they mimt not be 'here ; I think I said
either most or should not, bat which ex
pression I used I do not remember.
Q. Do you know whether that mes
sage waa repeated the second time ?
A. I think not. I told Maj. Maginnis
to say to Mr. Wallace that these mem
bers should not or must not be there at
the time of meeting next day.
< ?. Were they in the House at that
time?
A. Yes, sir ; so 1 understood at the
time. I gave the message to Maj. Ma
ginnla._
BER. POTTER'S COMMITTEE.
Ula ?Vetter to at Northern Friend About tb?
I Frauda InresUgatlon-Tho Cry of f'Rovo
lutlon" Only ? Republican Pretense for
I'artS Mn Fturposee.
Hon. Clarkson N. Potter has been ap
peau J to so generally by letter and by
representatives of the press to express
bis views-as to the investigation into tho
Presidential election frauds that he de
cided to make publie a private letter
which he wrote in reply to ono from a
clergyman in Now York, and which
covers very fully the inquiries addressed
to him, not only from that but other
Suertera. Mr. Potter shows very conclu
ively that the cry of "revolution" which
! the. Republicans have set np over this
h:restimation is eimply the cry of wolf
?when there is no wolf, and is a repetition
pf the bloody shirt business. The letter
ya as follows :
WASHINGTON, May 27, 1878.
: MY DEAR SIR: I have your letter ol
the 25th. I egree with you in wishing
i Congress would adjourn. I am one ol
I those who think the world is govorncd
too much. I should be glad to see the
power of Congress over matters of private
and special legislation entirely cut off
And Since much of tho public legislation
proposed disturbs business and unsettle:
industry, I have thought it might be well
Sf Congress, unless convened by thc
President, met but every other year, ai
is the case with the Legislatures in som<
bf the States. I accordingly propos?e
an amendment to the constitution pro
ividiog for biennial sessions of Congress
but it- h=s not been received with an;
favor. Other sections of tho country d<
not feel as we do nbout this, and wan
currency or subsidy or other legislation
! You ask me why Mr. Stephens wa
''howled" down, The "howling" was b
the newspapers. To interrupt tho pend
lng order of business by a motion or
statement requires unanimous concern
snd every ?iembs? has thc absolute righ
to object to the interruption. This ol
jeetion ia expressed by the words, "
pbject." or a demand for "tho regula
order." Sometimes one person willpn
vent the interruption, sometimes the di
siro to prevent it is general, and thoa tb
cry of "regular order*' will be from man
persons. It so h opp ?ned that there wi
a Very general unwillingness to hear M
Stephens. He bad suggested that ?
should receive and adopt the Ha
amendment. It was reported that 1
twenty-two names who wonld follow hi
in any motion of his to prevent inv?*i
gation. About this ho was'grossly ni
taken, and this made our side especial
unwilling to hear him. But you wi
observe that rhee I rose te make a pro
osition to Mr. Hale, and the Republic!
outcry prevented my being beard, it w
announced by thc press that "Mr. Pc
tor's ir juiry was interrupted." v.hilo ld
Stephens was hcad-liucd as "the venei
;ble statesman howled down by Pc* te
mob." You esk me why we would n
let the Hale amendment be attached
our resolution. Because it was not gt
mane. Au inquiry into frauda accoi
plished, and which changed the electoi
vote, ia proper, to prevent their repe
tion, but an inquiry into mere attemj
at fraud which resulted in nothing is n
First, because we understood it contain
recitals to which we could not assei
ami Wu'Cu W?li?u hu vi? "breed US ?O Vt
'against our own resolution ; second. 1
cause we offered Mr. Hale every opp
tunity to have his amendment adopt
las a separate resolution. That it was i
so offered shows it was really not desiri
Third, because its incorporation into t
! resolution might have had the effect
preventing any report apon the reso
tion. As it is, the committee will ht
: probably but one opportunity to rep
in this Congress, and this amendmi
; could, if added to the resolution, be cm
to prevent the report at that time, ti
thus to deprive us of an opportunity
report at all. Just as we got ready
report, we should be liable to be stop]
to take further testimony in some of
added States brought forward for
very purpose of preventing a report.
But you suggest that to raise. a qt
tion about the last Presidential elect
will bring on disturbance or revoluti
Not at all. About that "possess your
in peace." There ls not the eligh
chanco of revolution or distnrbai
When the whole country waa at fe
heat on the subject of the election a i
was found to establish a tribunal to \
upon the election, and every one subi
ted to that determination. The Pi
dent's title rests apon that. - -If nov
should appear that there was fraud wi
palpably affected tho electoral vote ;
which the commission did not nol
and if a legal remedy exists for corr
ing the error, you cannot believe I
such a proceeding under tho law ct
lead to disturbance. If there bc no :
?cg?? rc"*.cd7 canting, and Cor.j.
should hereafter, by tue approval of
Proaident, or by two-thirds of 1
Houses without that approval, pro
one, why should tho legal determina
thereafter bad any more produce di:
banco than tho decision of the cleef
commission did? Is it exactly bec
this is not Mexico, and because the
pie prefer determining questions by 1
methods, and if the legal methods 1
not been provided to invent legal n
ods of determining them and subs
the determination thus arrived at,
this country cannot be Mexican!
About the enumeration of electoral <
there could be no question. Eight
eight could only be counted as six
Neither could there be question tba
conceded vote of every State shoo
counted. To refuse that would be :
lutionary. Bat when there wera
bona fine returns tom a State,
claimed to be its vote, it waa a nec<
to decide between tni.te retorna b
either return could br counted,
determination could only be mat
the Vice President^ - who ?peUed tl
turns, or by. tao Congress in whose
once they wino opened. I thong
Clear from the nature of our governi
from the precedents, and from the
ions so many sUteamen had expr
that this grave power upon wale
last election did. and upon whicl
election might d?pend, could on
vested in Congress. If thia power :
ia Congress alone, then the actl
Congress was necessary before a <
could be made between conflicti.r
tarns, and to, whanaver tho two ii
of Congress C?Uld ?ol agree iii
choice of a return, on? ??oui4 pr??
one und the other the other, no ehoiee'
could ho bsd, and the vote of that State
would be lost. Not because one House
had any greater rights Or powers than
the other, hot bec?as? either or both
Houses together bad the? rigbV to reject
arbitrarily or to reicse;to reckon any cer
tain electoral.voto, but only because in
case of bona fide conflicting roturo* It?iss
a State: each claiming to represent ile
electoral vote, it was a necessity toci'cose
between the returns before tue vote pf
the State could be counted. Thia waa
the viow nt last established. For tho
electoral commission to ?'bcido tho dis*
fluted votes WA*.crea ted by Congress, and
bat was the only authority it .xxssecsed.
Now, it seemed to mo in 1870 that thia
waa BO clear, and that the leading Ito*
publican Senators had so generally com
mitted themselves to thin viaw in previ-'
ous discussions, that we ought to stand
Upon that ground to declaro that we
would abide the action of Congress,
would accept whomever the Congress
found to be elected, and that if tho two
Houses ahould fail to agree aa to-which
of the rcturna from any State from which
there were bona fide duplicate returns
should be received, whereby the vote bf
the 8tato we?-los?, and no election by ile?
electors should thus result, we would
then abide and maintain tho choice of
the House of Repr?sentatives, the body
authorised by the constitution to elect
tho President where there is no election
by the electora?, college. Instead of do
inor thia we drifted along until nt Inst lb?
Republicans, hewiug all'tho while to the
line, had got us Where Wo were ready to
accept the electoral commission. Hav
ing accented Jt, of. conreo wo were bound
to submit to its resulta, but we oughVat
least to bo allowed to show-if ouch was
the fact-that the returns upon which
tho commission passed were procured by
fraud. I admit that the Presidency. ie
not worth a civil war, but I have not be
lieved there was any danger of auch a
war. The generation who charged "tip
the heights of Frcdericksburg and ;do
fended the works at reieraburg will nor
go lightly, into another civil struggle.
We must yet y cara further on boforo that
will happen. I remember after tho elec
tion remarking to General McDoViOll
that a great mine ought to be exploded
by a spark, to which be answered, "Yes,
ir tho train be inflammable, but thin time
the ponder ia wet." He was right.
tho Republicana bluffed us. Years hence,
when it is remembered that wo needed
only ono electoral vote and that your aide
could not get on without every one of
the remaining : seventeen : fiat we had
.JIU? nari _?:"-ltu . -4 --- =
wv,wv , i/^i' ...... u?mv. ivj , ni?, ./..*. ...i-.
jorities were around tho capital, yours in
New England, the Northwest and the
Pacific coast; that the : moral sense of
the country was that our man was else-;
ted and yours not: that you had nothing
on your side but the control of an army
of which 10,000 men could not be got
together, the privates mostly in sympathy
with u:i, and commanded, by officors edu
cated to understand the supremacy of
the civil over the military authority
officers who, excepting the leaders,'Grant;
gian-? va ?u? Shsiid?s? eosl?, ? hi?Hs?o,
never bave been generally used to resist
the declaration of tho HOUHP nf KenVe
sentatives, (I am told this will appear
certainly whenever the secret correspon
dence of the War Department is re
vealed,) .and that you Were laden down
with the care of the national credit, the
first shock to which would have arrayed
against you all the. moneyed Institutions
In the country j that under such condi
tions, I say, your leaden contrived and
wero ablo to carry, through tho capture
of ali these votes, will be regarded as one
of the greatest political performances of
history. I admit the success of the Re
publican leaders. Having lain down
when the law was on, our .side and when
we ought to have stood up, it is not for
us now to stand up aa long us the law
remains against us. But you will ask
whether if there be no danger to publio
order from legal proceedings there may
aot bo from action by Congress. No;
no moro than from tue action of the
courts. Congress represents tho people
ot* tho country, but does not march be
fore them : it expresses, but does not an
ticipate their will. Should.fraud con
nected with tho electoral count appear BO
gross and palpable that you and ail hon
orable men shouid unite in denouncing
it, : CV^rress might ? then take action.
But if so. what Congress might do, beina
the result of the action of men, of ali
parties of the great body o? the people,
not of a party, would be effected quietly,
certainly ana without violence or distur
bance. In saying this I do not mean
that I expect the investigation to be
'followed by either legal or Congressional
action. What, if anything should be
Sone boca uso of the inquiry must depssd
pon the results of tho inquiry. But I
do mean that whatever action, if ?nyj
should follow the investigation, such ac
tion can neither disturb the order nor'
tbs prosperity of tho country. This cry
of wolf when there is no wolf, thia effort
to make it appear that there is danger to
peace or order from this investigation, is
a Republican pretense, like the "bloody
shirt" justification of carpet bag govern-,
ment; Uko the "public danger ' excuse
advanced for the enforcement cf Durella
infamous order and the protection of the
returning board by bayonets; like tho
cry set up after the election to prevent
sny agitation and to secure submission.
We must have a very sorry sort of popu
lar government if Congress cannot,even
inquire into frauds in the choice of the
executive with rmi. nndar.crnrinur tkn tMt&na I
and prosperity of the co?ntry7
What then, yon ask, is the purpose of
the investigation ? I answer, to ascertain
facts, BO that if frauds be established a
r?p?tition of auch frauds may be preven
ted, and if not, to clear up th it .general
belief thrcnghoat the country mat there
wero such frauds. It ls true that not
every allegation of wrong is to be in:
quired into by Congress; but when alargo
majority, of the people believe that tee
but Presidential election, was secured by
Iorganised fraud, surely an inquiry to ?s
certalu tbo facts ought to be had. The
fooling amongst many Republicans after
the election was that while we had been
cheated in the returns we had bull-dosed
the negroes as badly, so that thc accounts
of wrong we're about equal. Thia belief
in tho bull-dosing of the negro wa*
based mainly upon She fact that in cer
tain districts in tho Sooth which usually
gare Republican majorities there was
not returned a single Republican votel
Now, the people of th? North have never
Uuderefc>od'that thia condition of things
was fraudulently prepared by the Repub
licans. They ought to understand that
there never was? anything so dangerous
to a free government as a returning board. ?
i A delegation of persons vested with dla-1
j cretlcnary power to revise the votes cost j
become thus the body that elect So
long as they exercise their functions
|upcxv ?ho protection of tho c?tate clono
the jj'ilucnco and indignation of the poo
pie will prevent them from any flagrant
and enormous outrage. Tho publie pres
sure will necessitate some excuso for sub
verting the choice of the people, some
limitation opon the outraces, uswdb to '
tho popular wish. But'
. - .fa/EMi^'r-r^.???????..??!
for adrariring ?rierV??y
" Md ?iiar nduclarUJ
W]f?jjHi'
- SM.
*id?> to receive
retarn r^uale?? tia ^
Te for thu viovtaad
. utunjni
from the peopte by a, cordon of Federal
droops under the pretense W-t?fwervtog -
?rder, sair?uid them with Ptw?erci bayo- :
eta, and?they .qease, to b#mpon?iWeio
?qy ,oive but the national ad winlatrattofl ,
which protect, then.. Theij need theil
be no limit to, aa there !? ledger no check
apon, their abus?e. To throw ont the
rotes of one side and keep iu the rotes
*f"the ether. wit^aut cause, to invaat
, pretext for such wrouac, tp accept after
con?nved protests Sui* manufactured ob
JeeUon? as color for their action, to permit
Cg?r?s to bo altered, returns to be forged,
frauds .to be perfected, and generally
every mean? by which the will .of the
peoplp may be frustrated and the popular
voice stifled then becomes' possible, and '
there may be thus a condition of things.
absolutely destructive of free government.
We celiove that it was by such proceed?
I iogs we were cheated out of tho election.,
Unless the proceedings, be exposed, the
outrage Will be repeated.
. ff an administration cac defraud ita
opponents out of the results of an elec
tion at which they had seventeen electo- -
ral and 300,000 popular majority, and no
effort is made even to inquire luto the
Wrong, there ?is nothing the next time to
tirevent tho same admin filtration cheating :
heir ?ppo?ent?, wren though tho latter
have forty electoral votes and a million
popular majority. And. this will go on
time after time until tho outrage becomes
intolerable. Let ns rather, as Air. Jcfibr
ton said, "have a jealous care of the right
bf election by the people, t&A ?eek ? safe
and mild correctivo for abuses which,
where no peaceable remedy 'is provided,
are lopped by the sword of revolution." '
It has been said!that there was nothing
bore ^oowajrdly _*hao, $1,00&0$D? except
$2,000.000.. This,is natura!. Bui it is
the mistake of capital to magnify ' the
?l?ngere on the surface and overlook those
hat lie held w. JustOow yrjur capitaUcta
are troubling theraselvja about thp com
mune, and oppose tho reduction of tho
army, which they, would have kept up as
a national -police,' And yet innogleat '
cojantry of tho world fa there so little .
danger of communism as.is thia,-- for.,
nowhere is property BO generally difitrib
utcd. But capitalists stood by supinely
Iwhen the army was used to protect rc
turnip? boards in stifling tbs votes of
$tatie*- vtsd f??*traUcg the wsll of their
neohin. Rhd F*?H|e? th? ??5tess?.-if u's+z- "
bininrj order to Bubvcrt. the very priuct
Iple of free government. Believe me in
this there waa reald&nger. Govern ment? .
ate based upon principle. Tho theory of
thia government is that the poople of tho.
States shall choose electors for them
selves, and that by tho aggregate voico of
such electors the national cxecutivo eh ail
be selected. To let the party lb pover
IntnriA?-^ hy forC-0 O? *?Vif)M nrptcL't a
local board'in falsifying .tho Will of tho
localities is to subvert the theory of this
government and lead surely to its do- '.
structlon. Whatever may result, from
the proposed investigation, you may be
sure that nothing can result that will dis
turb either your flocks or yo~r balances.
The trouble to capital, property and free
dom will come,' uot perhaps in your time
or mine, but come at last' from refusing
to inquire into frauds. To confront the
evil, ff you nay not right it, la to prevent
?t? re?i?titlon. To shut Voyr ,e?es to it
supinely is to jeopard and not to preserve
the future nesca, safety and proaparlty of I
tho country.
Faithfully yours,
CLARKSON N. POTTER.
-^ 'tiew ' . ? -?
Ar?weij? ?b>\nir& As^?i?.
> At the moctingof the Board of Hoaltb
yesterday, Dr. Elwyn Waller, tho chem
ist to the board, presented av long report
of bis investigation into tho case of Ma
ry Ann Dougherty, the young girl whoso
death was reported to have beeri caused
by the inhalation or absorption into the I
.ystem of poi?on by handling artificial
flowora colored with arsauiato of copper.
Dr. Waller found that artificial leaves
are covered with a film of wes. ta pr?
tent tho colors from rubbing and to im
part to the muslin of-which they arc
composed the . necessary atiGu?d?. Sam
plea of seven di?ersut- siy.es e? leaves
were examined, With the fullering;re
sult: Two of them contained conside
rable amounts of arsenic, no doubt In
i he form of Paris .green (srsenlato of
cop:>er) ; two others contained very
Might traces of arsenic, and the other
??neb Were entirely free from it. An the
leavea ?re covered with was. or paraffina
bo danger ls to be apprehended for these
Working with the finished leaves; : Dried
gsassos aro - colored and then tied in
small bunches calle i ""piquets," and tho
operatives thed arrange them with arti-1
ficlal leaves and flowers, ? in sprays,
wreaths, &o.| which aro offered to custc-:
mere. The grass used in .the piquets ia'
known to botanists as tho Brisa media.
In itself it has no poisonous properties.
ri'?._ r^ ^<r""?-_.i t- - Jf. _f_.?
btnation of the yellow ' and blue giving
the grass a greenish tint. * An examina
tion of thea? coloriBgi?atteregave nega
tive resulte for arsenic? The other plant
(need for the piquot ia botanically known
as the Sialicc. It Is recorded that many
of th? members of this family of grasses
have very irritating properties, and ar?
?uaed by beggar* in tho south of Europe,
to produce ulcers on the. skin, in order
?thereby to excite the pity of the charita
ble. The piquets of this plant tt>ere
i found to be covered Wills; a. preparation
containing much corbenato of lead,ap
8^ lied apparently in a semi-pasty condl
on. The piquets of both kinds when,
shaken slightly gave off ? dust consist-'
ir??, jf A> ltnniriu?nn>Ail milk tl.?? <w\l/vn?.?n!.
matter used in their preparation. No
areenic was detected "iu them. The
Saesticn of how far work with those ar
eles is dangerous to the operatives
turns chiefly on tho dangers to be appre
hended from the use of picric acid. As
the hands Uko up enough of the color
ing matter to carry if. ta the brows, if tho
operatives ate their noouday meals with
nnwasbed bands, they might be exposed
to the danger of poisoning as well as the
risk of absorbing it through the skin and
lungs. . Picric acid b t^ed ca a ?add?cir ?
in many diseases, notably in intermittent
fever, as a substitute for quinine. In
large doses it is poisonous, and when
death is caused by it it results from a
steppagii of the action of the heart.
Ar regards tba fatal d?se for a human
bifdg, no t5ase of fatal poisoning by
picric acid ie yet on rocowf. In oanclu
sloU, Dr. Waller recites the facts connec
ted with the death of Mles Dougherty,
and the result of the post t*ortet* exami
nation, and says that ha must lea vs ?
fWr one skilled in the practice of modi;
jae to decide how far tho oeot?pation -th
he deceased contributed to her death -
JV. K 2W _
- OM postage stamps; *r0 b!?
prised io Chins, and a hundred csncelled
stamps will buy a baby. Acccudiagiy,
tha ltpman CMbol.c mls?h^?^JW?
collecting the old stated awipctet'-v
k.^r tho infsbti, whom they .bria* ap.**
Christians, while the Inf?*Q'0H,.?3??
arranca -hoir treesarss a* wau CKKKK?
tiona. . , .- . ???
. For all dfsessM of th- b:
know, of SOTjnj
Ball's Blo???-Hf-v