The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, April 27, 1876, Image 2
JAS. A. HOYT,
E. B. MURRAY,
THURSDAY MORNING, APRIL 27, 1376.
THE STATE PRESS ASSOCIATION.
The second annual meeting of the
South Carolina State Press Association
will be held in Spartanburg on Wednes?
day, May 10th, 1876, at 10 o'clock a. m.
An address upon the subject of journal?
ism will be delivered on Wednesday
evening by Capt. F. W. Dawson, of the
^ Charleston Ncica and Courier, who has
been selected as the anniversary orator.
Members are requested to be punctual in
attendance, and journalists who are not
members are invited to send in their
applications.
JAMES A. HOYT, President.
A. A. Gilbert, Recording Secretary.
\* Newspapers interested in the As?
sociation will please copy.
AN ADTOCATE OF COALITION.
A communication appears in another
column from John E. Breazeale, Esq.,
who comes forward as an advocate of
coalition with honest Republicans, and
cites the example of Gow Chamberlain
to prove that there ore honest Republi?
cans in South Carolina disposed to give
the people a correct government. Before
entering upon the argument, it is perti?
nent to the if sue made by Mr. Breazeale
to ask a few questions, which will indi?
cate the value of his opinions as to the
proper action of the Democrats. In the
first place, does Mr. Breazeale belong to
a Democratic Club ? As he seeks to
create the impression that others are
actuated by prejudice in advocating a
straight out fight, is it clear that he is
not acting from similar feelings? Is he
not an appointee of Governor Chamber?
lain's, and does he not hold the office of
United States Commissioner? Can a
man's prejudices not sway him fully as
far in favor of any measure as another's
will influence him against the same
measure? On the score of prejudices,
we think Mr. Breazeale is. unfortunate
in making the allusion. Now, as we
understand the custom of political parties
' in this country, unsought advice from
outsiders is not generally accepted, and
it would be better fbr Mr. B. to connect
himself with the Democratic organiza?
tion before attempting to influence the
action of that party, and we feel confi?
dent that free discussion inside the ranks
will never damage the cause. Indeed,
this is the very advice given by Mr.
Breazeale, but We cannot perceive where?
in he is to obtain a hearing, unless he
oins the party, and we are quite sure his
views will then be accorded a respectful
consideration, even by those most strenu?
ous in their advocacy of a square issue
with Radicalism in all its protean forms.
Bat we will not dwell any longer upon
the source from which this advice
emanates, and will briefly examine the
points made therein. We deny the very
first proposition laid down, which is that
"the Republicans have a majority of
thirty or forty thousand voters in this
State." We do not believe there is any
such a majority, and there are no figures
to sustain the statement. On the con?
trary, the very last "square out fight"
was made in 1868, when Gen. Grant was
a candidate for the first time, and when
the State was under a quasi bayonet rule,
at which election the Republican majori?
ty was exactly 17,679 votes. No election
since that date has been conducted upon
partisan principles, for the bulk of the
Democrats have consistently voted for
Republicans of every shade and hue.
Not only is this true, but there are thou-,
sands of Democrats all over the State
who have refused to vote any ticket in
every election, on the ground that they
would not vote for Republicans. This
class is stronger than ever to-day, and
any fusion or coalition in the pending
campaign will drive them away most
certainly. But, for the sake of the argu?
ment, let us admit that the estimated
difference between the parties is abso?
lutely correct. Does this prove the
assertion that a square fight is perfect
folly? It was a majority of thirty-five
thousand votes which the Radicals
claimed in Mississippi, and yet they were
defeated by thirty thousand at the polls!
But "experience has proven that the
colored man will vote the Republican
ticket." It is not strange that experience
has taught this lesson in South Carolina,
where only Republicans are nominated
by either party. But when did the
colored man have an opportunity to vote
any other ticket? He has not certainly
been given the opportunity of ranging
himself with the Democratic party, when
3uch a party has existed only in name
until recently. In fact, it has not ex?
isted very much in name during the last
/our years, for the majority accepted the
appellation of Conservative, which was
done as a concession to the Republicans
mainly. We have just as much right,
therefore, to assume that the colored man
will vote the Democratic ticket?pure,
unadulterated and straight-out?as the
advocates of coalition have to assume
that the colored vote will be caught in a
net by throwing out the biit another
time that we are supporting honest Re?
publicans. Until it is demonstrated?by
actual experience, not supposed?that
the colored man will not vote the Demo?
cratic ticket, we submit that all such
assertions as we are considering are
worth just nothing at all.
Now, let us examine briefly the propo?
sition that Gov. Chamberlain has given
tangible evidence of a sincere desire to
reform the State government, and is
working earnestly in behalf of the State
generally. The recent utterances of the
Governor as contained in his letters to
Senator Morton and President Grant, not
to mention his speech in the Radical
3tate Convention, show conojusively that
?is main purpose and most ardent desire
is to firmly establish the Republican
party in South Carolina, and remove the
disgrace and odium which attaches to
the party name he holds so dear to his
c>wn heart. There is not a single pre?
tence of non-partisanship in all of his
pablic utterances, nor a word of encour?
agement to the advocates of coalition.
He plants himself firmly and squarely
upon his devotion to the Republican
party, whose interest is the paramount
object in view, and never hints for a
I Editors?
moment that he has any desire to form
an alliance with Democrats-. But are
the reform efforts ttf $ov. Chamberlain
satisfactory? Has taxation been re?
duced in point of fact? True,- the veto
message of the Governor last winter
upset an infamous tax bill, and in its
stead we have a reduction of the levy
and a change of objects for which the
money is raised. But a part of this re?
duction only distributes taxation over a
series of years, and the consequence of
reducing the past levy is to carry it for
wai-d to the next year, for there is a
large deficiency to be made good, just as
in previous years. One-half the salaries
of officials and a large portion of the
sums appropriated for penal and charit?
able institutions will not be paid out of
the present year's taxes, which have to
be met at another time. We cannot
perceive the benefit to be derived from
such reform, which temporarily reduces
taxation, in view of the pending cam
paijjn. Even Gov, Scott was cunning
enough to perform this trick in the cam?
paign of 1870, and his adherents then
claimed for him great merit on the score
of economy, when the fact remains that
the people are not yet through with
liquidating the deficiencies of his admin?
istration. Where is the school appropri?
ation for the present year? Will Ander?
son County receive more than two-thirds
of the apportionment? Where is the
Solomon Bank swindle, by which the
State was defrauded of Two Hundred
Thousand Dollars, which was made pos?
sible by Gov. Chamberlain trusting so
implicitly in his party friends ?
1 his hasty glance at the financial re?
form effected by Gov. Chamberlain must
suff .ee for tbe present. It is not in keep?
ing with "the pledges that be so earnestly
made before bis election," nor is it in
consonance with the condition of tbe
people, who are made to groan from year
to year for the benefit of "the
parly." Genuine reform is a failure, so
long as the Governor depends upon the
material afforded by bis political asso?
ciates to effect that reform, and he has
opealy boasted in regard to keeping
Democrats out of office in this State.
Yet, it is undemiably true^ that iu every
measure of importance he Was dependent
upon the-- Democratic members of the
Legislature for support, and he has never
exhibited the paltry gratitude to ac?
knowledge their services, for a confession
of his reliance upon their endeavors
would be accepted by the country as
proof conclusive that the Democrats were
working unselfishly for the good of the
Stale, and reveal the fact that a majority
of his own party were seeking personal
and selfish ends.
Gov. Chamberlain is Weakening in his
own party, and recent events make it
clear that he cannot control the machine?
ry for any permanent good to the State.
Even admitting all that our correspon?
dent claims for his administration, we
fail to perceive that there is any reason
to induce an alliance with him. He has
not asked for it. nor intimated that there
is any probability of his making a fight
for good government, outside of party
lines. When the time arrives and the
opportunity is presented, it will be soon
enough to arrange such a programme as
was indicated some time ago by Ex-Gov.
Perry. But purblind Democrats will
insist upon pledging in advance the
strength and support of the Democratic
party, without knowing whether or not
the Governor is to remain associated in
bis reform character with the recognized
thieves and plunderers, whose potent
control has manipulated every movement
of the party so far. When he comes out
from amongst them, and ceases to pledge
his fealty to the corrupt organization
known as the Republican party in South
Carolina, it will be an evidence of his
patriotism rising above the strife of party,
and give encouragement to tbe idea that
he is earnestly striving to make "a con?
test, not for party, but for honesty."
Until that is done, we cannot avoid the
conviction that as Democrats we have
neither part or parcel in the plans, pur?
poses and aspirations of Gov. Chamber?
lain, who is seeking to build up and
maintain respectability as a Republican.
Others may imagine it a duty to praise
and i?atter a political opponent, whose
whole record is antagonistic to their own
feelings, but we have bad enough of con?
cession, conciliation and compromise
within the last few years, in the pursuit
of unfruitful policy and unmanly self
degradation. There is neither wisdom
nor sagacity in pressing this illusory
phantom any longer to our hearts, and
not until we perceive that Gov. Cham?
berlain has determined to sink the parti?
san in the statesman, to repress his politi?
cal prejudices for the welfare of the entire
people, will we consent to an alliance
with him in tbe contest before us, or
abate one jot or tittle of our opposition
to his pretended and unsatisfying reform.
A CARD.
Th e action of the Brushy Creek Demo?
cratic: Club, in proposing my name
among others as a suitable one to be con?
sidered at the primary election to repre?
sent Anderson County in the Legislature,
awakens gratitude for tbe kindness and
partiality exhibited by the citizens of
that locality. Yet, I am compelled to
urge most respectfully a prompt declina?
tion of the intended honor, as I cannot
consent to become a candidate in tbe en?
suing campaign. The position occupied
by me as a public journalist, advocating
the interests of the Democratic party,
renders it a matter of vital importance,
in my judgment, that my efforts be un?
mixed with personal or political prefer?
ment in any manner or form, and I am
convinced that my influence can be
wielded more effectively for others than
were I to accept any nomination for pub?
lic office. Such has always been my pri?
vate conviction of the duties of a journal?
ist, but, if in tbe past I have yielded to
the persuasions of partial friendship, my
experience teaches that the freedom, in?
dependence and unselfishness of a patriot
can best be illustrated by an editor when
he is not a candidate. I have every con?
fidence that the Democracy of Anderson
County will place able, upright and com?
petent men in the field for every position,
and it will be a great pleasure for me
to work earnestly and unremittingly for
their success. But I must be allowed to
withdraw my name from further consid?
eration in the canvass, and be left un?
trammelled to promote the harmony,
unity and ultimate triumph of Democra?
cy, for whose success I have labored in
sease n and out of season, without the hope
of fee or reward.
"Very respectfully,
JAMES A. HOYT.
?RANT'S ALLEGED CORRUPTION.
The country has been regaled with so
many evidences of fraud and corruption
within the last several months, implica?
ting prominent officials and influential
members of the Republican party, that
recent allegations against President Grant
do not excite special wonder and conster?
nation. In ordinary times, the develop1
mento made in Washington last week
Would arouse the whole people to intense
indignation. But we are becoming ac?
customed to revelations of a startling
character, in the ordinary acceptation of
that term, and the vigorous prosecution
of investigating committees into the past
history of Gen. Grant's administration
no longer furnishes food for unusual ex?
citement or sensational flourish. It is
plainly expected by the public that the
lightning will strike heavily about the
person of the President, whose intimacy
with Belknap, Babcock and other gentry
of that guild cannot fail to connect him
with doubtful practices and ignoble pur?
suits.
The Committee on Expenditures in
the Department of Justice have un?
earthed a rich bonanza in regard to the
misappropriation of government funds
for election purposes. Our readers will
remember the charges made in 1872 that
election frauds were committed in New
York, Pennsylvania and North Carolina,
in which the influence and money of the
general government were freely used to
prevent a fair election. The recent reve?
lation relate to the conduct of the elec?
tion programme in New York, where
immense sums of money were used to
secure a Republican triumph. The un?
lawful diversion of public money was
under the supervision and control of the
Department of Justice, whose chief de?
tective, Whiteley, has made the astound?
ing declaration that $35,000 of the secret
service fund under his charge went di?
rectly into the hands of John I. Daven?
port, chief supervisor of elections in the
city of New York under the enforcement
act, upon the order of Attorney-Generals
Akerman and Williams, who were acting
under instructions front the President.
Whiteley testified that he protested against
this use of the secret service fund, and
that he demanded written instructions,
which were promptly given in every in
stance^ and the Attorney-General repeat?
edly told him that it was the express
order of the President
The testimony of Attorney-General
Williams confirmed the statement of
Whiteley in every essential particular.
He was not disposed tc make the pay?
ments to Davenport, but President Grant
overcame his scruples by saying that
Davenport was engaged upon an impor?
tant work, in preparing some books which
were intended to prevent frauds in the
elections. Davenport was not required
to file any vouchers for the expenditure
of money, and his demands were honored
without question as to the purposes for
which the money was used.
Mr. Akerman was before the commit?
tee on Monday last, and acknowledged
having given money to Davenport from
the secret service fund, but when asked
whether he did so by direction of the
President, he requested further time to
frame his reply to the question.
Davenport's testimony alleges that he
commenced his system of registration
under the auspices of the Union League.
After spending ten thousand dollars, he
met up with President Grant at Long
Branch, and was assured by the Presi?
dent that he would recommend the mat?
ter to Williams. He received altogether
about $34,000, partly through Akerman
and partly through Williams. He never
considered that there was any corruption
in the business, although it is not pre?
tended that his work was authorized by
any law. Davenport is an infamous and
notorious character, whose disgraceful
conduct as supervisor of elections in 1872
was fully exposed by the leading news?
papers at the time. He received $20,000
from his Beeret service fund just before
the election in 1872.
President Grant denies the charges
made against him, and denounces the
statement of Attorney-General Williams
as untrue. He has no recollection of
Williams calling upon him in reference
to the disbursement of money under
Davenport's manipulation, and that if he
did it was represented to him in a differ?
ent light, by which he was deceived. He
is firmly resolved upon a full investiga?
tion of the charges, and has decided to
take the advice of his Cabinet in the
premises. The humiliating spectacle of
an American President under charges of
unlawful application of the public money
for election purposes, when he was a
candidate for re-election, is rather too
much of a load for the Republicans, who
are sorely vexed at the persistence of a
Democratic House of Representatives in
raking the embers of an expiring dynas?
ty, whose history is replete with every
evidence that a personal government has
been maintained during the last eight
years, without regard to the means em?
ployed in perpetuating its power and sus?
taining its woful ascendency.
Radical Strategy. ?The Abbeville
Medium, in referring to the resolutions
adopted by the Republican County Con?
vention, puts its oar on the right side as
follows:
It was by just such political legerde?
main as this that the good, honest, con?
servative people of Anderson were cheat?
ed out of a State Senator two years ago,
and by which the Radical leaders in that
County hope to secure another victory.
There is death in that cup, and we warn
?ur neighbors from having anything to
do with it. "Merits" and "qualifica?
tions" have never had anything to do
with a solitary radical office-holder in the
State. If it were so they would not be
in office. These two important things
they never possessed, and it is folly to
try to decieve the people with such stuff.
Radical politicians have no merits, and
are qualified only to lie and to cheat and
steal. Senator Cochran's little game is
decidedly thin?about on a par with his
boasted reform, and should not deceive
the people into any fellowship or com?
munion with his unfruitful works of
darkness. This is an effort at coalition
to which no true man can subscribe. It
is a firebrand, intended to create confu
siou and divide the Democratic vote?a
blind to lull the people into a false secu?
rity. It was by some such movement
that Cochran was elected to the Senate,
and it is in this way that the Anderson
Radicals hope to rescue that County from
conservative control. If the Anderson
Democrats stand together shoulder to
shouider, and give no heed to such strat?
egy, they can elect a solid ticket.
? The Blue Ridge mountains were
covered with snow ou Monday the 17th.
i
EDITORIAL NOTES.
The hall of the-House of Representa?
tives has been secured for the meeting of
the State Democratic Convention, which
will be held at Columbia on Thursday
next, 4th of May. The hour for the
meeting has been fixed at seven o'clock
p. m>, which Will enable the up-cotiritry
delegates to leave home on Thursday
morning. Everything promises a full
representation and harmonious session.
It is not expected that the Governor
will announce his appointment of Attor?
ney General to succeed Mr. Melton until
the last moment before the resignation
take? effect. We understand the proba?
bilities are that either Mr. Wr. E. Earle,
of Greenville, or Mr. Wm. Stone, of
Charleston, will likely receive the ap?
pointment. Both of these gentlemen
now occupy the position of Assistant Dis*
trict Attorneys for the United States.
It has been understood for some time
that preparations were making for the
establishment of a new daily newspaper
in the city of Charleston, and we are now
in receipt of the prospectus, which in?
forms the public that the Charleston
Publishing Company will issue the
initial number on tbe 1st proximo, en?
titled The Journal of Commerce. It will
be devoted to the commercial, material
and political advancement of the State,
and its columns will be supplied with
the latest and freshest gleanings of in?
formation from every quarter. The
political character of the paper will be
progressively Democratic, and it is prom?
ised that "the redress of public wrongs
and grievances will always find in it a
willing and sympathetic medium." We
extend a fraternal welcome to the Jour?
nal of Commerce, expressing the hope
that its career may be enduring and
profitable.
The proceedings of the Fork Demo?
cratic Club will attract attentioq. By
an unanimous vote, the Club has re?
quested Senator Cochran to "step down
and out" from the position he now fills
by the grace of the Republican party,
with the assistance of several hundred
Democrats, who Were duped into support?
ing him in the last campaign; We
warned the Senator a few weeks ago that
the sentiments of the people had changed
towards him, and that his official acts
were distasteful to a large majority of the
voting population in Anderson County.
We told him that his betrayal of the
trust and confidence so generously
accorded by many Democrats would be
repelled and resented, and the proof is
gushing out with surprising promptness*
Mr. Cochran received a handsome vote
among the best citizens of the Fork coun?
try two years ago, and the resolution
adopted on Saturday last shows the light
in which he is regarded now. The muta?
tions of time will further convince him
he is egregiously mistaken in his calcula?
tions for the future?that his cunning and
deception will not avail in the next elec?
tion. We understand Mr. Cochran pro?
poses to canvass the county this summer,
when he will explain the miraculous
statesmanship evinced in that vote for
Whipper I He might accept the sugges?
tion of the Fork Democrats, and give the
people an opportunity of endorsing or re?
jecting his marvellous sagacity as a leg?
islator.
Donn Piatt, in the Washington Capital,
tells an admirable story upon a Georgia
Congressman, who was disco in fit ted re?
cently by an occurrence of a personal na?
ture, in which he figured conspicuously
as a colored gentleman. The story is
transferred to our columns to-day, and it
reminds us of an anecdote told upon a
couple of Anderson politicians a few
years ago. It was during the reform
campaign of 1870, when colored speakers
were frequently if not profitably employed
in canvassing for the Carpenter and But?
ler ticket. A mass meeting had been ap?
pointed for Belton, and the imported
speakers of African extraction failed to
put in an appearance. But two promi?
nent and worthy citizens of the County,
who are gifted with oratorical talents, re?
sponded to the invitation which had
been extended to them, and made vigor?
ous, effective speeches in behalf of good
government. One of these gentlemen is
rather dark complected, resulting from
his contact with the sun in early youth.
After the speaking was over, the audience
dispersed to the hospitable homes around
Belton, where good dinners were awaiting
the invited guests. At one- of the houses,
when all had been seated at the dining
table, a gentleman deemed it polite to
address a remark to the hostess, when the
following dialogue ensued: "Madam,
were you out at the speaking to-day?"
"0, yes, sir," saiu the lady. "Well, how
did you enjoy it?" says the gentleman.
"Very much, indeed." Pausing a mo?
ment the gentleman again sought to in?
crease his stock of information: "Well,
madam, who do you think made the best
speech ?" This disconcerted the old lady,
but she replied : "Ah! well, sir, I hate
mightily to say, but to tell the truth, /
think the nigger beat the white man!"
She had mistaken our witty and eloquent
friend for one of the low-country darkies.
Suffice it to say, he has never been back
in the neighborhood since.
THE YOCUM TRIAL.
The trial of B. G. Yocum, County
Treasurer of Chester, for breach of trust
and larceny, has been progressing for the
past few days before Judge Northrop,
who was assigned to hear the case incon?
sequence of the recent personal difference
between Judge Mackey and the defen?
dant. Up to the last account no testimo?
ny warranting a conviction was obtained.
The most important feature of this case
is, that Judge Mackey had issued a habeas
corpus for John Lilly, an ex-member of
the Legislature, who was in the peniten?
tiary upon conviction for a felony, in or?
der to procure his testimony against
Yocum.
When Lilly was offered as a witness
the defendant's counsel objected on
account of his incompetency. Judge
Northrop sustained the objection, and
thereupon the Solicitor produced a par?
don from Governor Chamberlain for
Lilly, which contained the following
proviso: "On condition that the pre?
siding Judge shall only deliver said par?
don when he shall certify under his hand
and seal to me that the said John Lilly
has testified in the trial of B. G. Yocum
fully and in good faith." Judge
Northrop very properly decided that this
was no pardon, as Lilly could not testify
until he was pardoned, and the pretended
pardon did not pardon him until after he
had testified. This is a glaring instance
of an attempted abuse of the pardoning
power ou the part of the Governor, for it
was granted to a man who is considered
to be one of the worst of criminals in
order to get his testimony against another*
man, and the pardon is only granted on"
condition that he does actually so testify.
To say the least of it, the offered pardon
presented a very streng temptation to
Lilly to swear against Yocum whether
he knows anything or not, for by so
doing he would secure his own release
from the penitentiary. The conduct of
the Governor in this matter is very repre?
hensible indeed, for he not only attempt?
ed to turn loose a criminal upon society,
but at the same time gave him a strong
inducement to commit perjury against
another citizen if Yocum is not guilty.
The trial is still progressing.
THE WAE AMONG THE RADICALS.
Judge Carpenter's Reply to the Gov?
ernor's Speech.
To the Editor of the News and Courier :
You published in your issue of the 14th
inst. my remarks in the Convention, and
the reply of the Governor, characterizing
the former as "bitter" and the latter
"crushing." If you were right, the bit?
terness was simply that of facts that can?
not be denied, and if, for a temporary
purpose, anything was crushed, it was the
truth. As you did not publish my re?
joinder, I must ask as an act of justice to
myself that you publish this letter. My
general charge against the Governor was
that he had not only deserted the friends
who elected him, but had persistently,
with personal taunt and executive lash,
tried to drive and keep them in the
wrong, with a view to their destruction
and his exaltation. That charge was
supported by the most ample and con?
clusive proof. How was it answered?
By the statement that he had met me at
Chester, in 1870, as the chosen leader of
the Democracy,-and that I had made a
vulgar, vituperative and profane speech.
This, in whole and in part, is simply un?
true. We met there on the occasion re?
ferred to for a joint debate. The late
Mr. Jonas Byrd opened the discussion,
and Governor Chamberlain followed in
a carefully prepared speech, and when I
rose to reply, his crowd began to throw
boulders, raised a mob, fired pistols, and
broke up the meeting, and I did not
speak. The speech referred" to by the
Governor is purely the product of his
imagination. The truth of this State?
ment will be found in your paper of
August 21st, 1870, and the testimony of
every person then present. But Mr.
Chamberlain did deliver a speech which
was subsequently published, and is before
me. He asserted in that speech that
only $700,000 had been added to the
State debt since the inauguration of Gov?
ernor Scott; that the funded debt of the
State, when Governor Scott came into
office, was only $4,934,849,17 ; that his
administration was wise, prudent and
honest; that it was endorsed by New
York, the broker's board and the banker's
desk, as solvent, trust-worthy and honest,
and characterized a statement of Mr.
Byrd's, that the bonded debt was then
$14,500,000, as absolutely false. He said
he was giving an account of his steward?
ship, spoke as a state officer holding a
hign public trust, and proposed if any
fraudulent act, an instance of misman?
agement, or misappropriation of public
funds could be proved, ne would agree to
be driven from office and from the State.
[Pages 1, 3, 4 and 5.1 What were the
then existing facts ? The State debt had
at that time been increased $7,564,000
without any reference to the past preten?
ded indebtedness of the State in any
shape, and every bond making up that
increase had been issued. The items are
as follows: For the relief of the treasu?
ry $899,000. conversion bonds fraudulent?
ly issued $5,965,000, land com?
mission $700,000. The State paid inter?
est on all these bonds from Januar}' 1st,
1869, to 1871?except $500,000 which
were issued October 1st, 1869, and $500,
000 issued March 1st, 1970, and the cou?
pons since 1871 are held as a demand
against the State. The records of the
treasury show that two years' interest was
paid upon this enormous issue of conver?
sion bonds, as well as the others. These
facts were for the first time to my kuowl
edge clearly established by the evidence
in the case of the State against Parker.?
By law the financial board, of which he
was a member, had absolute control over
these bonds, and it was his duty to have
known the facts. Whether he did know,
or neglect a plain duty, is for the public
to decide. In that speech he ridiculed and
scoffed at Reform, and his eyes blazed
with as lurid a light then as when he was
making his unfounded charges against
me in the convention.
The Governor denied my statement in
regard to the contingent fund. If I
am wrong, I am misled by the laws
as published. The whole amount of
contingent funds the last year of Gov?
ernor Moses's administration was $47,100,
and in that is included $5,600 not proper?
ly charged to it. (See acts and joint res?
olutions 1873-74, page609.) I am wholly
unable to find the $32,000 additional in
any appropriation bill. He claims that
by vetoing the tax bill passed by the
Legislature in the spring of 1875 he
saved the people $375,000, that being the
estimated difference between the prpceeds
of that bill and the end he approved.?
Now it i3 a notorious fact that there will
be large deficiences under the bill
he approved in every brauch of the pub?
lic service; that the salaried officers of
the State cannot receive more than one
half of their salaries, and the penal and
charitable institutions cannot receive
much more than half the sum neccessary
for their support.
Where is the merit of leaving these of?
ficers and these institutions without funds
in mid-summer? And where, is the
saving to the State when these funds
must be supplied by a deficiency of tax
next winter? The Governor charges that
1 sowed in the campaign of 1870 "those
dragon teeth that afterwards sprung up
into the masked Ku-Klux at night," and
that subsequently I came here and gave
testimony to shield them from justice.
The first of these charges implicates all
who were acting with me, including the
News and Courier. Is it possible that any
man in South Carolina can believe that
such men as Governor Perry, Gens. Ker
shaw, Conner, Kennedy, McGowan, But?
ler, Col. Rutledge, Judge Aldridge, the
late Chancellor Dunkin, Col. Simpson,
and other distinguished leaders, ana the
whole mass of their followers, were in?
citing, the people to the commission of
such crimes? If true it must not have
been so, for they gave me a generous and
continued support to the coo ef the can?
vass. It is true, I obeyed the process of
the Court, and was examined as a witness,
not to prove any particular fact, but to
give as my opinion the primary cause of
those horrible crimes, namely, the ad?
ministration whose honesty and capacity
Governor Chamberlain had vouched for
at Chester, I give to both charges the
most unqualified denial; there is not a
shadow of truth in either. I call as wit?
nesses the columns of your able journal,
the hundreds of thousands who heard me,
and the records of the case in which I
was a witness.
No one ever heard me advocate vio?
lence as a remedy for any evil. I have
always relied, and advised others to rely,
upon peaceful and legal means, and I
defy proof to the contrary. No answer
was vouchsafed to the other charges I
brought against his administration ; but
instead we were told that there had been
times in his administration when had it
not been for the tender counsels add sup?
port of the wife of his love and his bosom
lie would have faltered on the way and
stained the record. Was that a sufficient
answer? What is necessary to be re?
formed except the administration of
which Governor Chamberlain was so
conspicuous and able a member? The
charges against the administration of
Governor Moses were not that the Legis?
lature had been Venal or corrupt, but on
account of the officers he appointed and
his personal conduct.
Reform in all departments until hon?
esty and economy prevail in each, is the
demand of the press and the people of all
parties and both races, and no matter
who is Governor, public opinion must
and will be potential enough to carry on
the good work of perfection. I have la?
bored for it, and shall continue to do so
until nothing is left to be reformed.
I do not complain of Governor Cham?
berlain's reforms. I complain that by
abandoning his friends he has accom?
plished scarcely anything, and that if he
had stood by them and worked with them,
we would have been much farther on the
right road. I am actuated neither by in?
terest or ambition, but by a sincere desire
to subserve the best interests of this
whole people.
Why does the Governor denounce me?
My attack was not upon him, but his ad?
ministration of public affairs. How can
that be defended by personal abuse ? I
have no defence to make. If my sacri?
fice of time, money, health and feelings:
if the manner in which I have discharged
the duties of the responsible positions I
have held do not constitute a complete
defence for me,.then words are useless
and unavailing.
Very truly, your friend,
April 17,1876. R. B. Carpenter.
Governor Chamberlain Declines Fur?
ther Discuislon.
Columbia, S. C, April 19.
7b t/ie Editor of the News and Courier :
Judge Carpenter having made two
speeches, while I made but one, in the
late State Convention, is, still, very prop?
erly, not satisfied with the result, and ac?
cordingly avails himself of your columns
for further discussion. I decline to fol?
low him. I will defend myself, and the
cause I represent whenever defence is
needed, but there is better work for me
than "slaying the slain."
I have never abused Judge Carpenter,
and I never shall, but, for myself, I am
heartily glad that he has, at last, ranged
himself where his sympathies have
doubtless long been.
It is true that I did not present to the
Convention, in my single speech, a full
review of all the reforms happily inaugu?
rated and carried forward, by the friends
of good government, under the present
administration; but I did repeUhe at?
tacks of Judge Carpenter, in a manner
satisfactory to me at least. That done,
I pass to other duties.
D. H. Chamberlain.
STATE CONTENTION OF THE YOUNG
MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION.
This body convened in Columbia on
the 18th inst., in the Baptist Church, and
organized temporarily by electing Mr.
A. J. Dodamead Chairman and Messrs.
W. S. P. Bryan and J. S. Davant Secre?
taries. The object of the Convention
was stated to be the organization and in?
struction of new associations and the
creation of an interest in religion among
young men. About fifty delegates were
present, and the Convention adjourned
until the next morning.
An open air meeting was held in the
afternoon, and addresses made by Messrs.
John Rothwell, H. Chisulm and A. J.
Dodamead. In the evening a devotional
meeting was held, and interesting ad?
dresses made by Messrs. C. E. Chichester,
C. C. Brown, L. Broaddus and John
Roth well.
At 9 o'clock a. m. on the 19th, a bible
reading was conducted by Mr. John Roth
well at the rooms of the Association. At
11 o'clock the Convention re-assembled,
and proceeded to its permanent organi?
zation by electing the following officers:
President, C. E. Chichester; Vice Presi?
dents, E. B. Murray, R. C. Oliver, C.
David, D. J. Winn, B. W. Edwards, T.
W. Stanland; Recording Secretaries, W.
S. P. Bryan, F. S. Dibble; Correspond?
ing Secretary, J. Rothwell.
The topic of the "Necessity and Ad?
vantages of Young Men's Christian As?
sociations" was opened by an address
from Wm. H. Lyles, Esq., and was dis?
cussed by Messrs. B. IV. Edwards and
A. G. Byars. The topic, "Proper work
for Associations in Country Towns" was
opened by Rev. C. E. Chichester, and
discussed by Messrs. H. T. Miller and
A. G. Byars. Rev. H. T. Miller, the
blind preacher, won the hearts of the
members of the Convention by his charm?
ing manners and splendid musical attain?
ments, which were displayed at various
times during the session to the great de?
light of those present. A committee was
appointed to draft a constitution and
designate the form of organization to
render the Convention permanent. The
body then adjourned until the next day.
In the afternoon there was a large open
air meeting, and at night a very interest?
ing devotional meeting was held, at which
the large assembly were entertained by
addresses from Messrs. Walker, Moor?
man, Stanland, Byars and Miller.
On Thursday morning the report of the
committee on permanent organization
was received and adopted, and the fol?
lowing officers elected: President, Rev.
C. E. Chichester; Vice President-;, E.
B Murray Rev. D. J. Wynn and B. W.
Edwards; Secretaries, W. S. P. Bryan
and F. S. Dibble; corresponding secre?
tary, J. Rothwell; Executive Commit?
tee, Mr. John Rothwell, chairman; to?
gether with Messrs. A. J. Dodamead, R.
C. Oliver, A. T. Smythe, C. David, J.
S. Davant, S. W. Stanland, F. S. Dib?
ble, C. C. Brown, S. Thomas, Jr. and
Col. Mclver.
Invitations were received for the place
of next meeting from Winnsboro, Col?
umbia, Sumter, Spartanburg and Green?
ville, and after some discussion it was de?
cided in favor of the latter. The topic
"The requisite qualifications for a presi?
dent of an association" was then opened
by Dr. Byers in a short address, after
which several delegates asked both him
and H. S. Miller questions relative to
the practical working of associations,
which were answered to the satisfacaion
of all. "How best to conduct singing
in devotional meetings" elicited some
happy remarks from the last named gen?
tleman, who sang "Waiting and watch?
ing for me" and other solos, which were
enjoyed by the large audience present.
The young people's meeting in the after?
noon was also addressed by these two
Christian workers, the church being
packed, and scores of people requesting
the prayers of God's people, after which
the Women's Christian Association had a
religious service.
At 8 P. M. the association was called
to order. A vote of thanks was then ten?
dered to the Baptist brethren, to the rail?
roads, and to the citizens.
And is the custom in farewell meetings,
the delegates then .came forward and
formed a circle by joining hands in the
pulpit, down the stairs and in the aisles,
and singing "Blest be the tie that binds,"
&c. It was a solemn and impressive
scene. After prayer by Mr. Miller, all
joined in repeating the Lord's prayer.
The association was then declared ad
journed to meet in Greenville next year,
and the farewells of those delegates leav?
ing on night trains were said.
Addresses were then made by Drs.
Pluraer, Girardeau and Byers. These
addresses were interspersed with hymns,
which were rendered with great effect.
At 10 o'clock the benediction was pro?
nounced in order that those who felt it
necessary might leave.
It is to be hoped this meeting will ac?
complish much good, and that many as?
sociations will be formed throughout the
State.
? Rev. A. N. Expcridon, the Bulga?
rian priest, is doing Darlington County.
? The taxable value of property in
Atlanta is put down at thirty millions.
? There are only about three thousand
delinquent tax-pavers in Beaufort Coun?
ty
? The snow is deeper in the Sierra
Nevada mountains than any white man
ever saw it before.
? Five hundred boys are educated at
Girard College, Philadelphia, but the
legacy has so greatly increased that
room is being made for 2,000 pupils.
For the Anderson Intelligencer.
Messes. Editors: Much lias been said
through the public journals of the State on
the course to be pursued by the Democracy
at the next State election. Some advocating
a straight out ticket, and some advocating
coalition, and as this is a free country, one
in wliich every man is guaranteed freedom
of speech, not only by the Constitution of
the State but by the Constitution of the
United States, I hope I may have the privi?
lege of advancing a few thoughts upon the
political situation of the State, and to make
some suggestions as to the most advisable
course to be pursued in the coming election,
although that course may differ from the
one that you have so earnestly advocated
through your columns.
In theory the plan advocated in your col?
umns might do, but it will never do in prac?
tice. It is all very well to talk of running
an "Independent Democratic ticket," "a
white man's ticket," &c, but an effort to do
so will only insure defeat.
The Republicans have a majority in this
State of thirty or forty thousand voters, and
to talk of overcoming them in a square out
fight is perfect folly.
We may talk of what every white voter
can do if he will only use his efforts, but ex?
perience has proven that the colored man
will vote the Republican ticket. It is natu?
ral for him to do so, and to abuse him for
using that suffrage that has been bestowed
on him, as seems to him best, will never
cause him to vote otherwise. To talk of
drawing a color line only shows that he
who so speaks does not permit his better
judgments to govern him, but is governed
more by prejudice and feeling. In politics,
especially at this day, it behooves every citi?
zen to look at the situation in its true colors,
and then to devise, if possible, the best plan
to he pursued for the interest of the whole
State; to view the condition without preju?
dice, and if finding that condition bad, then
to study the best remedies to that condition,
and when found to apply it, and it behooves
every citizen to act as he conscientiously be?
lieves the necessities of that condition de?
mand.
Here then arises the question what course
of action will be most advisable for the Dem?
ocrats to pursue in the coming election ? I
have already intimated that a square out
fight will not effect the best interest. Then
what will ? While I fail to be able myself
to definitely mark out that course, yet hy, I
hope, an unprejudiced view of the situation
I have come to the conclusion that the best
plan that I have seen suggested it the one
suggested by Hon. B. I'. Perry sometime
since. At least I believe that a stronger
fight can be made next fall for good govern?
ment in South Carolina than has been made
since the late war, and I believe that it can
be done by supporting Gov. Chamberlain in
his efforts of reform, and at the proper time,
should such an opportunity be offered, to
meet Gov. Chamberlain and all the Repub?
licans who desire reform, and to make a con?
test not for party but a contest for honesty.
But many will disagree with me. What 1
Is it a disgrace to sustain a Republican
Governor in his efforts for reform ?
But, perhaps, many will say that the Re?
publicans have fiad control of the State gov?
ernment since 1868, and that they do not
seem to desire reform.
This charge is made against them as a
party, and yet many fail to give any credit
to those of the party who have for the last
two years been working earnestly in behalf
of the State. Has Gov. Chamberlain made
no efforts for good government? Has he
not attempted to carry out the pledges that
he so earnestly made before his election?
Then why not sustain him in Iiis efforts in
behalf of good government.
But many love their own cherished feel?
ings of hatred and contempt so much better
than they do the interest of the State, that
they would advocate and support an Inde?
pendent Democratic State ticket, though
with no hope of success, rather than lend
their aid in supporting an honest effort for
honest government, mode by the better class
of the Republicans; and by so doing, unite
solidly the Republican ranks, and give them
full sway to elect whom they please to fill
the various State offices, although they may
belong to the worst element of their party,
when the balance of power might bo hold
in the hands of the minority.
Messrs. Editors, I do not propose to en?
gage in politics, yet have thought that some
good might be effected, by giving you in
these few words my reasons for not advocat?
ing a straight out fight; and have done so
with the hope that the good citizens of An?
derson County who have been aroused in
behalf of good government may thisk over
the matter, and discuss it in their organiza?
tions. I, too, believe in honest government,
and commend any and all efforts to obtain
it, and while others may differ with me in
reference to the best plan to obtain it, I am
always ready to accord them the same priv?
ilege that I take myself? that is, to think
and act for myself, and I never censure any
man for Ids honest opinions. But while I
agree with you, Messrs. Editors, in the
object to be obtained?an honest govern?
ment?yet I do not think we are likely to
secure it by a straight-out fight.
Organization will do very well, and I do
not oppose it, but let these organizations be
ready to avail themselves of whatever may
be to the interest of the State, even though
it he coalition with the honest Republicans
of the State. Let there be a free and unre?
served discussion in these organizations in
reference to the best way out of our present
condition. Let every man feel that he is a
part of the State, and he not afraid to express
his honest eonvictions. If we fight for good
government, let us fight with a hope of suc?
cess. Let us know no Democrat, no Repub?
lican, but let the all-important question be,
Is he honest?
Then, under the banner of honesty, let us
gather all of whatever name, color or con?
dition, and march on to victory. With this
banner floating above us we may hope to
drive all those from public positions who
have brought a atigma on South Carolina,
and may soon be enabled to see floating
shove our Capitol, the banner of peace,
prosperity and happiness.
With the hope, Messrs. Editors, that we
may soon realise such a victory,
I am yours, most Respectfully,
JOHN E. BREAZEALK.
Tribute or Respect.
Whereas, it has pleased the Architect of
the Universe to remove hence our Brother
S. L. W. ELROD, who departed this life in
Piercctown, S. C, January 25th, 1876. Bro?
ther Elrod was a progressive member of
Williamston Lodge No. 24, A. P. M. There?
fore, be it
Resolved, That in the death of our Brother
S. L. W. Elrod, our Lodge has lost a valua?
ble member.
Resolved, That we sympathize with the
widow and children of said deceased Brother
in their irreparable loss, and commend them
to the Father of the Fatherless.
Resolved, That these resolutions be pub?
lished in the Anderson Intelligencer, and that
a copy of the same be sent to the family of
said deceased.
J. W. CRYMES, Chm'u.
Mr. C. A. Heed Informs us'that he
still has a small amount of Cheat ham Cotton
Seed, which he is anxious to dispose of either
for cash or on the share plan. This latter
permits the farmer to experiment without
any outlay of money. He will certainly
make cotton enougii to pay for his labor,
and may make a crop which will remuner?
ate him handsomely. Specimen stalks of
the Cheatham Cotton were sold last year for
$30.00 a piece._
MARKETS.
Anderson, April 26,1876.
Cotton market dull, and unchanged. Mid?
dlings, 113 cents.
Chablertox, April 24,1876.
Cotton dull and heavy. Middling 12?<?>
12?.
New York, April 24.
Cotton quiet. Middling 131(5)13 5-16.
ANNOUNCEMENTS.
FOR SCHOOL COMMISSIONER.
3P3~ The many friends of DR. W. Q.
BROWNE respectfully nominate him as a
suitable candidate for School Commissioner
of Anderson County?subject to the action
of the Democratic party.
?&* The friends of Mr. ANDREW J.
WATT respectfully recommend him as a
suitable person for School Commissioner of
Anderson County?subject to the nomina?
tion of the Democratic Party.
FOR SHERIFF.
?S3~ The friends of JAMES H. McCON
NELL respectfully announce him as a can?
didate for Sheriff of Anderson County at
the next election.
The many friends of W. T. GR?BBS
announce him as a suitable person for the
office of Sheriff at the next ensuing elec?
tion. Help our one-arm Confederate soldier.
Stockholders' Meeting.
THE Annual Meeting of the StockholiT
ers of the Greenville and Columbia:
Railroad Company will be held at the office
of the Company, Richardson Street, Colnm
bia, at 12 m., Thursday, 27th inst.
C. H. MAN80N, Secretary..
April 27,1876_41_1
J. B. McGkk. F. A. Danieia.
J.B. McGEE & CO.,
Auction and Commission Merchants,
ANDERSON, S. C,
WILL attend to all sales of Real or Per?
sonal Property, or Goods on con?
signment.
April 27,1876_41_3m
"VTOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT ?
.131 Notice is hereby given that the under?
signed, Administrators of Thos. Parks, de?
ceased, will apply to the Judge of Probate
for Anderson County, on the 30th day of
May next, for a Final Settlement and dis?
charge from said Estate.
G. W. LESTER, \ Adm,ra
E. H. BOBO, j ra
April 25, 1876_41_5
?^TOT/ICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT.?
Notice is hereby given that the under?
signed, Administratrix of John B. Earle,
deceased, will apply to the Judge of Probate
for Anderson County, on the 30th day of
May next, for a Final Settlement and dis?
charge from said Estate.
JANE A. EARLE, Adm'x.
April 25,1876 - 41_5
8ft?i?ffAK?>.GRIS-T;tflLlS.
TOn.txe'ins.
? I Ii EB i N E WATER; WJf EEL; 7000 in vEft. ??
is ENKF.O R .CIR Cu L A RS. RA I.T I >10 R E. MD
?/ MILL ftKA HING? MADE A
H AFTJNG. fUlLEYS AH0 HANGERS
Extra Meeting of Pomona Grange.
To the Members of Pomona Grange, An?
derson County. :
HAVING been petitioned by the dele?
gates of five of the subordinate Granges to
call an Extra Meeting of Pomona Grange,'
to consider matters of importance, I do
hereby, in accordance with the by-laws, re?
quest the members of the Pomona Grange
to meet in extra session at Anderson.C. H.
on the First Saturday in May next.
R. W. SIMPSON, Master P. G.
April 20, 1876_40_3_
CASH.
GREAT REDUCTION IN PRICES
To Cash Bayers of
DRUGS, MEDICINES, PAINTS,
OILS, LAMPS,
PERFUMERY,
TOILET ARTICLES, CIGARS,
TOBACCO, and
DYE STUFFS GENERALLY,
at
WIXHITE & WILLIAMS',
April 27, 1875_A\_
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
COUNTY OF ANDERSON.
COURT OF COMMON PLE AS.
Albert J. Clinkscales, Plaintiff, against The
Pendleton Manufacturing Company, Wil?
liam Perry and others Stockholders, Wil?
liam M. Ramply and others, creditors of
the said Company, &c., Defendants.?Com?
plaint for Injunction, Appointment of Re?
ceiver, Sale of Property, Belief, &e.
To all and singular the Creditors of The
Pendleton Manufacturing Company:
TAKE NOTICE, That by an order of the
Court in the above stated cause, yon
are required to establish your several and
respective claims against said Company be?
fore me, at my office, on or before the FIRST
DAY of JULY next.
JOHN W. DANIELS,
Special Referee.
Clerk's office, )
April 26,1876. J 41?10 ^
NOTICE.
THE copartnership heretofore existing
under the name and style of R. W.
SIMPSON & Co., Real Estate Agents, has
this day been dissolved by mutual consent.
R, W. SIMPSON,
JAS. A. HOYT,
C. J. HASCALL.
Anderson, S. C.j April 8,1876.
THE undersigned have re-organized the7
Company, under the name and style of
SIMPSON, ORR & Co., Real Estate Agents,
for the purpose of buying and selling Real
Estate on commission. Parties having real
estate to buy or sell will find it to their ad?
vantage to communicate with one of the
firm, as they have a large number of valua?
ble places on hand for sale, and are con?
stantly receiving inquiries for such places
as they have not on their list.
R. W. SIMPSON,
JAS. L. ORR,
C. J. HASCALL.
April 27, 1876_41_2_
TO THE FARMERS
or
ANDERSON COUNTF.
GENTLEMEN:
THE season is near at hand when some
of you may want to purchase a Steam
Engine, and as TOZER'S ENGINE is better
and more favorably known amongst yon
than any other, it requires but little to be
said in reference to this, as you nearly all
know to be the most simple, durable and
economical Engine yet offered to the Farm?
ers of this State; and I challenge the United
States to produce its superior for the purposes
to which it is intended. I have increased
my facilities so as to be enabled to supply
the increasing demand. I am prepared to
sell them at as low a price, and on as liberal
terms as any other first-class builder. I
shall endeavor to keep an Engine always in
store at Anderson C. H., in care of my
agents, Messrs. N. K. 8ULLIVAN & CO.,
who will furnish price list and terms on
application.
RICHARD TOZER.
April 27,1876 41 2