The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, April 13, 1876, Image 1
RATES OF SUBSCRIPTION.?Two Dollars
per annum, and Ose Dollar for six months.
Subscriptions are not taten for a less period
than six months. ?
? Liberal deductions made to clubs of ten or
more subscribers.
HATES Of ADVERTISIXG.-One Dollar per
square ol one Inch for the first insertion, and Fifty
Cents per square for subsequent insertions less than
three months. No advertisement counted less
* hau a square.
Liberal contracts will be made with thos^ wishing
to advertise for three, six or twelve months. Ad?
vertising by contract must be confined to the im?
mediate business of the firm or individual contrac?
ting.
Obituary Notices exceeding five Unas, Tributes
of Respect, and all personal communications or
matten of individual interest, will be charged for
at advertising rates. Announcements of marriages
and deaths, and notices of a religious character, are
respectfully solicited, and will be inserted gratis.
9'
BY HOYT & CO. ANDERSON, S. C, THURSDAY,. APRIL 13, 1876. VOL. XI-NO. 39.
LEGAL ADVERTISING.?Wo are compelled to
require cash payments for advertising ordered Iry
Executors, Administrators and other fiduciaries,
and herewith append the rates for the ordinary
notices, which will only he inserted when the
money comes with the order:' * ;
Citations, two insertions,. ? ? >- ? ? $3.00
Estate Notices, three Insertions', - ' - 2.00
Final Settlements, five insertions ? ? 3.00
TO CORRESPONDENTS.?la order to receive
attention, communlcaffons must be accompanied
by the true.name and address of.Uio writer. Re?
jected manuscripts will not be returned, unless the
necessary stamps are furnished to repay the postage
thereon.' .'
45*- We are not responsible for the views and!
opinions of our correspondents.
All communications should be addressed to "Ed'
itors Intelligencer," and all checks, drafts, money
orders, etc., should bo mode payable to the order
of HOYT 4 CO.,
Anderson, 8. C.
BERKLEY HALL.
BY "LA CAROLINE."
CHAPTER XV.
"Farewell! a word that must be, and hath been:
A sound which makes us linger?yet, farewell!"
Hubert Gray retired to his chamber
the night after Marion's rejection of his
snit with a heart full of contending emo?
tions, which made him too restless to
sleep. Had his proffered love been
scornfully or even coldly refused; bad
there been no room for hope, the young
soldier could have returned home, and in
a few short months or years, perhaps the
love which then so absorbed his whole
being that it seemed to have been born
with him might have been crushed out
of his manly breast, and the "Lily
Santcc" recalled to memory only some
fair, sweet flower, whose rare beauty and
delicate fragrance had conferred exquis
ite delight in a dimly remembered past
But she loved bi^ j' xbe proud South
era girl, the peerless Marion Mabam bad
confessed S?e }oved him with a passion
s?e tfas helpless to control. It was true
she bad denied bis suit. She bad even
spoken of her love as a bitter sorrow and
a deep reproach. "But she loves me
and her grief only proves how strong her
love," thought the young, man, exulting
ly; and hope, radiant, heaven-born hop
thrilled bis heart with exquisite joy.
"She loves me! she loves me! and
shall not love, holy love, conquer??
Sweet heart, poor little fluttering heart
do not struggle so wildly to be free
Turn from me those soft, pleading eyes
I cannot, I will not let you go! You
are mine; in the chains of love I hold
you mine; and, oh! Marion, love's tyran
ny is so sweet! 'Go, forget,' you say
I canuot forget; I must cease to live ere
I forget the priceless treasure of your
love, my peerless 'fieur de Its.'"
In such ecstacies of hope did the exgi
ted young man murmur as he paced with
hasty strides the narrow limits of his
chamber until memory recalled the look
of earnest resolve upon the face of
Marion, and the passiouate exclamation
which burst from her quivering lips: "
do love you, but I will not be your wife
Hubert Gray!" Then the bright flush of
hope which had lighted with momentary
glow the fine features of Col. Gray was
succeeded by an expression of angry de?
spair,
"No, no, she does not love! She is a
woman politician! Woman, gentle wo
man, loses her dearest charm when leav
ing tne safe limits of her empire?home
?and casting aside the royal prerogatives
of mother, wife and daughter, she seeks
with her frail strength, and in her untried
armour to do battle on the rough and
dusty highways with man, declared by
omnipotence creation's lord. Then from
her pure, fair brow falls the diadem of
modesty, which had cast around hex such
a halo of uneartfily grace and beauty
that proud man himself was constrained
to bow before her who, in her humility
alone, could conquer. Ah! it 13 of such
as these it has been written : 'The heart
of her husband doth safely trust in her.'
"But no, Marion, dearest and loveliest
of your sex, it is not for fame you strive;
you do not seek to tread ambition's dan?
gerous paths. 'My country! my people!'
is your cry. It is upon the altar of pa?
triotism that love must be sacrificed.
Liberty and patriotism?words of power,
sentiments of grandeur, embodiments of
a beauty and a glory worthy indeed of a
poet's dream, a hero's life and a woman's
devotion! Bnt alas, alas! in this poor
stricken land of ours, it is, I fear, a senti?
ment cherished by a few?a very few?
the pure in heart who, conscious of their
own integrity of purpose and firm adhe?
rence to principle, scorn to deal with
brethren as traitors. Thus the magical
words liberty and patriotism become the,
strongest wires held in the greedy grasp
of the wily politician, 'whose thoughts,
tending only to ambition, they do plot
unlikely wonders,' and the faithful devo?
tee of patriotism is left worshipping with
blind idolatry the image only?the life?
less image of a grand reality. Thus, the
patriot becomes a fanatic, and shall I
without a struggle yield a life time of
happiness to wild fanaticism ? No, uo; I
must woo the gentle enthusiaste so earn?
estly and tenderly she will be constrained
to say me, 'Yes.' But she does not love!
she cannot love, or Hubert Gray would
be all to Marion Mahara?home, country,
kindred, friends! Her words, too, were
full of scorn and pride: 'Go, forget me!
a daughter of Carolina may not wed a
Federal soldier!' 0, no, she cannot love,
for ungentle pride and holy love cannot
dwell together. Haughty girl, I will
obey your proud mandate; I will go, and
shame my manhood into forgetting the
scornful Southerner! Proud, Bcornful,
did I say ? O, Marion, forgive the angry
words, the ungenerous thought!
"How pale she looked; how deeply
marked the sorrow lines in her sweet,
young face, and even now I hear the ring
of bitter grief in her voice: '0 Hubert,
Hubert, your people have robbed us of
our glory! A cry of sorrow echoes
through the land, mothers and daughters,
wives and maidens weeping for their
loved and slain. Little children, too?
helpless orphans, whose cherub beauty
never won the smile ot love from a fond
father's face?reflect in their infant faces
their mother's .grief. But they are the
children of heroes, of patriots whose
memories are all that is left us of our
departed glory, and we must, we will
cherish them, as a precious heritage
which will in years to come shed over
our land a beauty and a grandeur which
will seem not born of earth !'
"While listening to her earnest words,
I thought truly patriotism is a reality.
Liberty still lives, and has found a hiding
place in a pure woman's heart! Can I
hope to win the gentle enthusiaste to
forget her country, on whose altar she
has placed hei heart with a devotee's
passion? Would, my Marion, that I
could restore the fair beauty of your
land, the happiness of your people!
But the past must remain a thing of the
past, and iu that valor which is born of
Christian endurance and belongs only to
noble nature's, must our whole people
find a redress for their sorrows and their
wrongs, for are we not one people, and
will not, in some not far distant day, the
whole body suffer for the blow dealt upon
one, even one of its members? God
speed the day when the good and true
through the length and breadth of this
great country, united in one holy brother?
hood, taking for their motto, :in omnibus
charitca' shall raise once more the watch?
words 'Liberty and Patriotism.' Then
may we look for the promised blessing
happiness. 'Happy is that people that
is in such a case, yea, happy is that
people whose God is the Lord.'"
It was long past midnight before Hu?
bert's eyes were closed in sleep, and even
his dreams were shadows of his waking
thoughts, clothed in fancy's vain but
brilliant hues, or in the dark shades of
dull despondency.
At first his dreams were all of music
and of mirth. He walked through bril?
liant saloons, filled with throngs of happy
faces. He listened with rapture to the
soft music which echoed through tho3e
halls of pleasure, ever and anon the ten?
der melodies, interrupted by a merry,
girlish laugh, whose trilling, gushing
notes became a quick, and lively inter?
lude. Ever and anon by his side, her
white band resting lightly on his arm,
was the gentle Southern girl into whose
willing ear he whispered love's soft noth?
ings. There, too, he saw friends and
kindred whose faces beamed with kind?
ness. The loved and lost had returned
to earth again, wearing the forms and
features of time's children, upon whose
fair but fading beauty we read inscribed
the touching wordB, "Passing away, pass?
ing away." In Walter's warm grasp, his
hand rested, and Annie's sweet, low voice
breathed affectionate congratulations.?
Mrs. Maham shone as when he had first
known her in her summer beauty, and
the good Colonel was again the genial
host of the gay assembly.
But suddenly the scene changed. Iu
an old, old church, beside the altar rails
stood a young coupje to plight their troth
and receive the nuptial blessing. The
altar was lighted by numerous tapers,
whose dull and glimmering light only
served to make more sombre the deep,
deep darkness of the other parts of the
church in which there was no light at all.
The darkness so deep and black, was that
of a starless midnight, and all along the
narrow aisles were low echoes of unearth?
ly sounds. The dull light of the tapers
revealed the earnest faces of the youth?
ful pair, beaming with love and hope.
The beautiful marriage ceremony of the
Episcopal Church was nearly concluded.
The mutual and solemn vows so sweet
to the listening ears of love had been
spoken. In the usual short, deep pause
which followed th,e minister's asking for
the ring, the air seemed to be buzzing
with strange sounds which dulled the
sense of hearing, and misty visions made
the sight dim and wavering. The cere?
mony continued, and Hubert, holding
the glittering pledge of love and trust in
his hand, proceeded to repeat slowly and
distinctly the words, "With this ring I
thee wed," but ere the ring had touched
the maiden's finger, there was a quick
flash of glittering steel?a phantom sword
cut in twain the golden circle, and a
stern voice exclaimed: "The blood of
heroes forbid that the daughter of a
Maham should wed her country's foe!"
Under the influence of those sepulchral
tones, the blood of Hubert Gray seemed
to freeze in his veins. A3 the cruel words
echoed from the dark walls and sank in
low whispers along the deep aisles, the
hand of his bride slipped from his arm,
and vainly did Hubert seek to grasp it.
Vainly, too, did he essay through the
increasing "darkness to recognize the fea?
tures of the shadowy form from which
the voice had proceeded. The bride, the
minister, the lights passed away into im?
penetrable gloom, and Hubert with a
violent start, awoke pressing his finger
and thumb closely and painfully together
to secure the half of the severed ring
which had been left him, and murmuring
audibly: "It could have been none other,
it was, it was the hand of the old hero,
Hezekiah Maham, that severed the gol?
den circle which would have bound in
dissolubly my love to ray life!"
With a violent and painful effort, Hu?
bert cast off the terrible nightmare which
had disturbed his slumbers, and spring?
ing" from his bed, he exclaimed: "What
a horrible dream ! But, in the language
of Hamlet, 'a dream is itself but a
shadow,' and shall I, a soldier, be scared
even by such ghostly shadows as have
darkened the* visions of this troubled
night! If ever I am fortunate enough
to be a guest at Berkley Hall again, I
I will plead for another chamber, for this
one is surely haunted, if not by ghosts,
by strange and ghostly dreams. My
head throbsysod my blood, which a little
while ago seemed to have stopped its
flow, is now burning and coursing rapidly
through my veins. 0, that the daylight
would come! I ?vill go and sit by that
eastern window that I may cool my brow
and watch for the first gleam of morning
light."
The morning's sun shone brightly on
field and wood ; even the old swamp, in
its grey morning drapery seemed to smile
softly beneath the warming influence of
the gay sunshine; but the sad faces of
the irfmates of Berkley Hall wore a still
deeper shade of sorrow, when the Federal
soldier said good-bye.
Hubert, watchful for an opportunity,
(although Marion, with womanly tact
and adroitness, sought to evade him)
found himself a few moments alone with
her before leaving Berkley. Eagerly he
questioned: "0, Marion, why do you
shun me ? Is your answer still the same ?
Have you no word of hope for me this
morning?"
"None, none," broke in trembling ac?
cents from the quivering lips of the girl.
"0, Marion, think what you do, when
you deprive a hman heart of hope. One
request I make: that you will for two
years at least encourage no other attach?
ment, and that you will not banish me
from your thoughts, but cherish my im?
age, as one whose life-time of happiness
is wrapped up in your love and your
fidelity. I will not urge you to be my
wife now, but be my dearest friend; per?
mit to visit you, to correspond with you ;
let us reason together, and when time
has, soothed your sorrows and healed the
wounds of your bleeding country, let me
hope to win to my heart and home my
beautiful Southern flower: I cannot say
as you do, 'Forget me,' even if it gives
you pain; I would be remembeted.?
Will you promise theu to cherish my
memory ?"
Slowly, and with painful effort, Marion
replied: "Col. Gray-"
"Call me Hubert, not Col. Gray!" ex?
claimed the young man, excitedly, inter?
rupting her. "Call me but love, and
henceforth I never will be Romeo!"
"Well, then, Hubert, my friend, I dare
not promise what you ask. I may never
unlearn love's lesson ; I may never teach
this poor, weak heart to still its wild
commotion when it hears the name of
Hubert Gray, or when memory, overleap?
ing all barriers, careless of curb or bridle,
recalls the image of our faithful friend.
Yet, I dare not bid you hope. Duty
should be the soldier's, the hero's and the
Christian's watchword. I will strive to
think of Hubert Gray only as a noble,
generous friend, and in the effort, even if
unsuccessful, I will find happiness, be?
cause mine will be the path of duty. 0,
Hubert, as Christians, let us, guided by
reason, seek to act rightly in all things."
"Love talres not reason for Counsel?
lor," said the young man, pettishly.
"Then, take him for physician,"* said
the girl, quickly replying to the quota?
tion, while a smile, full of arch raillery,
for a few moments beautified her sweet
countenance.
Hubert sighed as he gazed admiringly
upon the bright young face, and thought
of the happy past, when no shadow of
sorrow ever lingered there, except a sor?
row for the woes of others. "You use
cold, hard words," he replied. "Reason
and duty, words not written in love's
vocabulary; and with them you seek to
scare young love away. But you cannot
deprive me of hope. Wrapped in the
soft, bright folds of hope's warm warmth,
my love shall fear neither the hammer?
ings of duty or the frost of reason. You
will let me write some times, and-"
"Come, Hubert, the buggy is ready,
and if you will not stay longer with us,
it is time to go, or we will miss the train,"
said Harry, entering the parlor, wholly
unconscious of the interesting tete a tete
he had interrupted.
"Then, good-bye; / will hope that we
may meet very soon again," said Hubert,
taking Marion's cold and passive hand in
his, and emphasizing the words, "I will
hope." Her only reply was a glance
from her tear-dimmed eyes, which spoke
eloquently of constant love, but firm
denial; it entreated, too, forgiveness for
pain given. Hubert understood only too
well the language of that earnest look.
Mrs. Maham wept to part with Walter's
friend, and would not let him go without
a promise to make another and an early
visit to Berkley Hall.
"O, yes, Hubert," said the warm?
hearted Harry, "you must not entirely
forget your poor Southern friends."
As they drove from the door, the dis?
carded Federal soldier looked up to the
window for another glance at the sweet,
pale face of the Southern girl. But she
was gone! In the quiet of her own
chamber Marion Maham battled bravely
with a love she deemed unworthy a
daughter of crushed Carolina.
"Harry," said Hubert, just before they
reached the depot, "I have never known
the love of sister or brother. I delighted
in calling Walter both friend and broth?
er, but he is gone now, and except my
dear mother's claims, I am bound by
none of the sweet ties of kindred. Har?
ry, will you be my brother? Let us
throw across the deep, wide gulf created
by sectional prejudices and party strife,
a bridge of love. Harry, can you do
this? Can you forgive and forget? Can
you give me a brother's love ?"
"Yes, I can; I will, Hubert. I have
always loved and admired you. Your
nobility of character compelled my es?
teem the first visit you made to Berkley
Hall. I have nothing to .forgive in Hu?
bert Gray, and only great obligations to
remember, which entitle you to my
warmest gratitude. O, if all of your
people were only like Hubert Gray, both
brave and generous, there could have
been no strife between your people and
my people. But let bye gones be byc
gones, between us at least; and, believe
me, I am proud of my brother Hubert!"
said Harry, warmly grasping the hand of
the Federal soldier.
There was a short pause, and Hubert
spoke again, but this time hesitatingly,
while a crimson flush suffused his fine*
features: "I sec, Harry, that you and
yours, in common witli your suffering
people, are, and will probably be for
some time, pecuniarily straitened by the
unsuccessful and terrible struggle through
which you have passed. I have means
and money more than enough for my J
wants. Will not my dear brother share
my abundance with me? Harry, you
have promised me a brother's love-"
?"Though love use reason for Iiis precision,
he admits him not for counsellor." Most
probably the poet wrote "physician," in?
stead of "precision." Sec Stevens' notes on
I "Merry Wives of Winsor."
"I did not purpose to sell my affec?
tions," said Harrj', interrupting him ab?
ruptly, and speaking in a hurt voice.
Hubert observing the same proud look
on Harry's face which had glowed with
momentary anger on that of his sister
the evening before, hastened to say in a
voice of apologetic entreaty: "Take my
aid as a loan, only as a loan, to return
whenever it suits you." Then, reproach?
fully, he continued: "Am I not your
adopted brother? Would you refuse aid
from a Southerner ?"
The proud look was gone from Harry's
face, and he answered very gently: "I
thank you, dear Hubert, and appreciate
your noble and delicate generosity, but I
cannot accept your offer. I do not think
I would accept it under the present cir?
cumstances from a Southerner, for I have
no prospect now of ever repaying a loan
of any considerable value. But I must
be truthful, Hubert, and confess that
although I love and esteem you as a man,
a friend, a brother, yet I would not will?
ingly place myself under pecuniary obli?
gations to a Federal soldier. Our wounds
are still fresh and bleeding, and we natu?
rally shrink from every touch. Time,
with its healing, soothing power, in
scarring over these wounds, may change
my feelings; I know not, for I cannot
fathom them. Indeed, in these things I
know not my own heart, so filled it seems
to be with contrary emotions. But, Hu
hert, my friend, my brother, I know I do
esteem, honor and thank you! But-"
"The chasm is still too wide and deep
for human hands to bridge. The love of
God only operating in the hearts of
erring men can impel us to leap the
yawning gulf, whose dark waters, seeth?
ing and foaming, cast up perpetually the
mine and dirt of our corrupt hearts?em?
ulations, wrath, strife and bitter envy
ings," said Hubert, interrupting Harry,
and speaking sadly. "But, Harry, should
the time ever come that I can assist you,
and you are not still too proud to accept
a brother's aid, will you appeal to Hubert
Gray?*
"I will, Hubert, I will most surely!
But I do not fear poverty, for am I not
rich in youth, and strength, and hope,
and love?" said Harry, his face glowing
with manly pride and courage.
Hubert sighed; how gladly he felt
would he have exchanged his gold for
Harry's wealth of hope and love.
"Yonder, yonder comes the train! We
are just in time to catch it," cried Harry.
"Good-bye, Harry I"
"Good-bye, Hubert!"
The friends had wrung each other's
hands hardly, and parted. *
The train had come and gone. The
crowd of busy, anxious, eager faces which
had gathered at the depot, were gone,
too. Harry stood alone as if rooted to
the spot on which he had said good-bye
to his noble friend. Harry, the once gay,
light-hearted, carelsss Harry Maham was
lost in reverie. His heart was crowded
with thoughts and feelings which, as he
himself said and said truly, he could not
understand, so contrary were they in
their varied and varying emotions.?
Love, gratitude, respect and admiration
were the sentiments he entertained for
Hubert Gray; but he grieved that his
friend was on the wrong side, as he called
it. "Strange, strange, indeed!" said the
young man, musingly, "four years ago, I
would have sworn it impossible that
truth, honor, magnanimity and heroic
courage could adorn the character of one
who would take up arms against us. But
so it is. All these are Hubert Gray's.
'He is a man, take him for all in all; I
shall not look upon his like agaiu ;' and
sure I am, among his people there are no
more like him. His virtues are the op
posites of their vices. He would not
trample upon the weak!" Softly, inter?
rupting the harsh words, and mingling
with the solemn dirge of the old majestic
pines, came a gentle whisper, "Charity
hopeth all things, endureth all things."
But the gentle whisper fell unheeded, for
lifting his eyas towards the old church,
undcr-whose shadow the dust of genera?
tions of loved ones rested, he thought of
them?those brave old fathers, whose
courage and endurances, with God's
blessing, had won so fair a heritage for
their children; and .e gentle mothers
of the past who had rocked heroes in
their arms. The thought, too, of his own
loved father, brother and comrades whose
graves, scattered throughout the weeping
land, were watered by the tears of loving
but stranger hearts. Then a feeling of
inexpressible bitterness swelled his breast,
and he murmured angrily and audibly:
"Their children's right is freedom ! To
wrest it from us, is the work of ill gotten
power in the hands of envious, greedy
tyrants, cowards and false-hearted trai?
tors !" Then again came the same sweet
and solemn voice with the pine tree's
moan: "Bless your enemies."
The sweet, low voice of admonition
touched a responsive chord in the impul?
sive heart of the young soldier. With
deep reverence, and in holy awe, Harry
bowed his uncovered head, until the
whispered words seemed to have died
away among the white stones of the old
grave-yard. Then in a voice from which
pride's harsh, discordant tones were driv?
en away, he exclaimed : "I hope in Thy
word, therefore shall my heart praise
Thee, because of thy righteous judg?
ments."
? The most beautiful girl in the Uni?
ted States lives in Fulton, Missouri.?
She was at the college soiree on Friday
evening last. Her eyes send forth a light
so effulgent and magnetic that strangers
become spell bound under its influence,
I and stand rudely gazing. Her checks
bear a bloom like the sunny side of an
early peach. A pearl would seem almost
black beside her teeth. Her form is so
graceful that men worship before seeing
her face. Her hands suggest the idea of
waxen fingers, tipped with vermilion.
Her smile seems actually to illuminate
her presence, and when she laughs the
listener fancies he hears sweet music in
the distance.
THE ENFORCEMENT ACT.
Full Abstracts of the Supreme Court
Decisions.
. The Supreme Court of the United
States has recently made important de?
cisions in the Kentucky Election case
and in the Grant Parish case, both
arising under the provisions of the En?
forcement act of May 31, 1870. In the
Grant Parish case, the Supreme Court
sustains the order of Judge Bradley, in
arrest of judgment upon the verdicts, and
the causes are remanded with instructions
to discharge the defendants. The Ken?
tucky election case is likewise decided by
the Supreme Court adversely to the En?
forcement act. This was the case of the
inspectors of elections who refused to re
ceive the votes of two citizens of African
descent.
These decisions have been awaited with
great interest not only by members of
the bar, but by Congress and the people
generally throughout the country. Last
spring, when the Grant Parish case was
argued before the Supreme Court, such
eminent lawyers as the late Reverdy
Johnson and Mr. David Dudley Field
took such interest in the matter, and re?
garded the questions dependent upon the
deision of the court as of such vital
moment to the best interests of the coun?
try, that they went tb Washington and
argued for what they considered the con?
stitutional rights of the people without
money and without price.
The enforcement act of 1870 was the
beginning of the series of the acts by
which Congress undertook to control the
whole machinery of the elective fran?
chise, and to take from the States the
protection of the rights of the citizens.
It has been considered that upon the
validity of the initial act depends the
validity of the subsequent acts, as they
are all based on the same idea of the
paramount power conferred upon Con?
gress by the late constitutional amend?
ments. Hence the interest with which
the decision of the Supreme Court has
been awaited on all sides, and the anxiety
experienced in consequence of the long
delay of the court in announcing its
opinion. The opinion in both cases was
written and delivered by the chief justice.
In the Grant Parish case the opinion .is
confined almost entirely to .the discussion
of the different counts of the indictment
under which Cruikshank and the others
in the' case were apprended. It is de?
creed that the counts of the indictment
are defective, because the specifications
are too vague and too general. But the
opinion nowhere gives expression upon
the constitutionality of the enforcement
act itself. It was said by members of the
bar that it was very evident the court
wished to avoid a direct decision upon
the act. In the Kentucky* case the court
is not so guarded in its language. It
here sets forth its doubts as to the power
of Congress to enact such sweeping legis?
lation, and hints at the dangers to follow
from such a power.
This much may be deduced from the
opinion of the Court in the two cases,
that although it does not positively de?
cide the act unconstitutional in such
terms as to estop any further prosecutions
under it, yet that in all cases which are
likely to arise under the act, the Court
can do no less if an appeal is taken to it
than to dismiss them, as it has the two
cases in point. Practically this makes
the enforcement act a dead letter, and it
can hardly be avoided in some of the
cases which may hereafter come in re?
view before the Court that it must decide
unequivocally as to the constitunality of
the act.
HISTORY OF THE GRANT PARISH CASES.
The cases grew out of a riot in Grant
Parish, Louisiana, in 1873. A number
of negroes were killed, and indictments
under the so?called Enforcement act,
were found against certain white persons
charging them with conspiracy to deprive
colored citizeus of their rights, &c, and
with murder. Ninety-eight whites were
indicted, and nine of them were tried in
the United States Circuit Court. The
first trial resulted in a disagreement of
the jury, and the second in a conviction
of the accused. A motion was made in
arrest of judgment before Judge Bradley,
of the United Scates Supreme Court, and
Judge Wood. In an elaborate opinion,
holding the indictments to be illegal,
Judge Bradley argued that when any
rights or privileges of the citizen are only
secured in the Federal Constitution by a
declaration that the State or the United
States shall not violate or abridge them,
it is at once understood that they are not
created or conferred by the Constitution,
but only guaranteed against impairment.'
The thirteenth Constitutional amend?
ment, he argued, clothes Congress with
the power to pass laws for the prosecution
and punishment of those \s ho.deprive any
person of the rights it confers. The fif?
teenth amendment, while securing to the
colored people the right to vote, "does
not," says, Judge Bradley, "confer the
right to vote. It only confers a right not
to be excluded from voting by reason of
race, color-or previous condition of servi?
tude, and this is all the right that Con?
gress can enforce." The real difficulty
in the cases before the court, was to de?
termine whether the amendment has
given to Congress auy power to legislate,
except to furnish redress where the States
violate the amendment. On this point
the Court inclined to the opinion that
Congress had the power to secure that
right, against the unfriendly operation of
State laws, and agaiust outrage and com?
binations, &c, on the part of individuals,
irrespective of State laws. The question
was then considered whether the four?
teenth constitutional amendment em?
powered Congress to pass laws for direct?
ly enforcing all privileges and immuni?
ties of citizens of the United States, by
original proceedings in the United States
Courts, and Judge Bradley held that the
legislation required from Congress is
only such as will provide a remedy or
duo punishment for trespasses, and will
provide appeals from the State Courts to
the United States Courts in cases that
come up for consideration. In his opin?
ion, therefore, the indictments were
fatally defective. The cases went up to
the Supreme Court and were there elabo?
rately argued.
The following arc abstracts of the
opinions:
THE LOUISIANA CASE.
The United States, plaintiffs in error,
vs. Wm. J. Cruikshank, Wm. B. Irwin
and John P. Hadnot, in error to the Cir?
cuit Court of the United States for the
district of Louisiana Mr. Chief Justice
Waitc delivered the opinion of the court.
This case comes here with a certificate by
the judges of the Circuit Court for the
district of Louisiana that they were
divided in opinion upon a question which
occurred at the hearing. It presents for
consideration an indictment containing
sixteen counts, divided into two scries of
eight counts, each based upon section
six of the enforcement act of May 31,
1870. That section is as follows :
"That if two or more persons shall
band or conspire together, or go in dis?
guise upon the public highway, or upon
the premises of another, with intent to
violate any provision of this act, or to
injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate
any citizen with intent to prevent or
hinder his free exercise and enjoyment
of any right or privilege granted or
secured to him by the Constitution or
laws of the United States, or because of
his having exercised the same, such
person shall be held guilty of felony, and
on conviction thereof shall be fined or
imprisoned, or both, at the discretion of
the court, the fine not to exceed $5,000 I
and the imprisonment not to exceed ten |
years, and shall, moreover, be thereafter
inelligible to and disabled from holding
any office or place of honor, profit or
trust created by the constitution or laws
of the United States."
The question certified arose upon a
motion in arrest of judgment after a ver?
dict of guilty generally upon the whole
sixteen counts, and is stated to be
whether the said sixteen counts of said
indictment are severally good and suffi?
cient in law, and contain charges of
criminal matter indictable under the
laws of the United States. The general
charge in the first eight counts is tnat of
"banding," and in the second eight that
of "conspiring" together to injure,
oppress, threaten and intimidate Levi
-Nelson and Alexander Tilman, citizens of
the United States, of African descent,
and persons of color, with the intent
thereby to hinder and prevent them in
their free exercise and enjoyment of
rights and privileges granted and secured
to them in common with all other good
citizens of the United States by the con?
stitution and laws of the United States.
The offences provided for by the statute
in question do not consist in the mere
banding or conspiring of two or more
persons together, but in their banding or
conspiring with the intent or for any of
the purposes specified. To bring this
case under the operation of the statute,
therefore, it must appear that the right,
the enjoyment of which the conspirators
intended to hinder or prevent, was one
granted or secured by the constitution
or laws of the United States. If it does
not so appear the crimiual matter charged
has not been indictable* by any act of
Congress. We have in our political sys?
tem a government of the United States
and a government of each of the several
States. Each one of these governments
is distinct from the others, and each has
citizens of its own who owe it allegiance,
and whose rights within its jurisdiction
it must protect. The same person may
be at the same time a citzen of the United
States and a citizen of a State, but his
rights of citizenship under one of these
Sovernments will be different from those
e has under the other.
The duty of a government to afford
protection is limited always by the power
it possesses. The opinion here elaborates
the character of the government under
the constitution and its relation to the
States, showing that it was erected for
special purposes and endowed with all
the powers necessary for its own preser-1
vation and the accomplishment of the
ends its people had in view. It can
neither grant nor secure to its citizens
any right or privilege not expressly or I
by implication placed under its jurisdic?
tion. The people of the United States
resident witnin any State are subject to
two governments?one State and the
other National?but there need be no
conflict between the two. Thus, if a
marshal of the United States is resisted
and an assault made, the sovereignty of
the United States is violated by the re?
sistance and that of the State by the
breach of the peace in the assault. So,
too, in the case of counterfeiting. The
citizen owes allegiance to the two depart?
ments, so to speak, and within their re?
spective spheres must pay the penalties
which each exacts for disobedience to its
laws. ?
The government of the United States
is one of delegated powers alone. Its
authority is defined and limited by the
constitution. All powers not granted to
it by that instrument are reserved to the
States or the people. No rights can be
acquired under the constitution or laws
of the United States except such ?s the
government of the United States has the
authority to grant or secure. All that
cannot be so granted or secured are left
under the protection of the States.
The indictment is then examined at
length. The first and ninth counts state
the intent of the defendants to have been
to hinder and prevent the free exercise
of the right to peaceably assemble with
each other for a peaceful and lawful pur?
pose. This right existed long before the
adoption of the constitution of the United
States. It was not therefore a right
granted to the people by the constitution.
The right was not created by the amend?
ment to the constitution, neither was its
continuance guaranteed, except as against
congressional interference. For their |
protection in its enjoyment therefore the I
people must look to the States. The
right of the people peaceably to assemble
for the purpose of petitioning Congress
for a redress of grievances, or for any?
thing else connected with the powers or
duties of the national government, is an
attribute of national citizenship'. If it
had been alleged that the object of the
meeting was lor such a purpose the case
would have been different. The second
and tenth counts are equally defective.
The right there specified is that of bear?
ing arms for a lawful purpose. This is
not a right granted by the constitution.
The third and eleventh counts are even
more objectionable. They charge the in?
tent to have been to deprive the citizens
named, they being in Louisiana, of their
respective several lives and liberty, with?
out due process of law. It is no more
the duty or within the power of the
United States to punish for a conspiracy
to falsely imprison or murder within a
State than it would be to punish for false
imprisonment or murder itself. * The
fourteenth amendment prohibits a State
from depriving any person of life, liberty
or property without due process of law,
but this adds nothing to the rights of one
citizen as against another.
The fourth and twelfth counts charge
the intent to have been to prevent citi?
zens who were of African descent in the
free exercise of thejr several rights, &c.
There is no allegation that this was done
because of the race or color of the persons
conspired against. Stripped of verbiage
the count means nothing more than that
certain citizens of the United States,
bciug within the State of Louisiana, were
prevented from enjoying the equal pro?
tection of the laws of the State and of
the United States. The - fourteenth
amendment prohibits a State from deny?
ing to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws ; but this
provision does not any more than the one
which precedes it, and which we have
just considered, add anything to the
rights which one citize? has under the
constitution against another. The equal?
ity of the rights of citizens is a principle
of republicanism. Every republican
government is in duty bound to protect
all its citizens in the enjoyment of this
principle, if within its power. That duty
was originally assumed by the States, and
it still remains there. The only obliga?
tion resting upon the United States is to
see that the States do not deny the right.
This the amendment guarantees, but no
more. The power of the national gov?
ernment is limited to the enforcement of
this guaranty. No question arises under
the civil rights act of April 9. 1866, (14
stat., 27.) which is intended for the pro?
tection of citizens of the United States in
the enjoyment of certain rights without
discrimination on account of race, color
or previous condition of servitude, be?
cause, as has already been stated, it
is no where alleged in these counts that
the wrong contemplated against the
rights of these citizens was on account of
their race or color. Another objection is
made to these counts that they are too
vague and uncertain.
The sixth and fourteenth counts state
the intent of the defendants to have been
to hinder and prevent the citizens named,
being of African descent and colored.
In the United States vs. Reese, just de?
cided we hold that the fifteenth amend?
ment has invested the citizens of the
United States with a new constitutional
right, which is exemption from discrimi?
nation in the exercise of the elective
franchise on account of race, color or
previous condition of servitude. From
this it appears that the right of suffrage
is not a necessary attribute of national
citizenship, but that exemption from dis?
crimination in the exercise of that right
on account of race, &c., is. The right to
vote in the States comes from the States,
but the right of exemption from the pro?
hibited discrimination comes from the
United States. The first has not been
granted or secured by the Constitution of
the United States, but the last has been.
Inasmuch, therefore, as it does not ap?
pear in these counts that the intent of
the defendants was to prevent these par?
ties from exercising their rights to- vote
on account of their race, &c., it does-not
appear that it was their intent to inter?
fere with any right granted or secured by
the Constitution or laws of the 'United
States. We may suspect that race was
the cause of the hostility, but it is not so
averred; th' is material to a description
of the substance of the offence, and can?
not be supplied by implication. Every?
thing essential must fee charged positively
and not inferentially. The defect is not
in form but in substance..
The seventh and fifteenth counts are
ho better than the sixth and fourteenth.
The intent here charged is to put the
Earties named in great fear of bodily
. arm.. There is nothing to show that the
elections voted at were any other than
State elections, or that the conspiracy
was formed on account of the race of the
parties against whom the conspirators
were to act. The charge as made is
really nothing more than a conspiracy to
commit a breach of the peace within a
State.
We are, tberefore, of the opinion that
the first, second, third, fourth, sixth,
seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth,
fourteenth and fifteenth counts do not
contain charges of a criminal nature
made indictable under the laws of the
United States, and consequently they are
not good'and sufficient in law. They do
not show that it was the intent of the dc
fendants, by their conspiracy, to hinder
or prevent the enjoyment of any right
granted or secured by the constitution.
The fifth and thirteenth, the "eighth
and sixteenth counts are now considered.
The intent in the first two is to hinder
and prevent in their rights as citizens of
the United States and the State of Lou?
isiana, for the reason that complainants
were persons of African descent and race;
and in the other two to hinder and pre?
vent them in the exercise of rights grant?
ed by the constitution and laws of the
United States. The conclusion - is irre
sistible that these counts are too vague
and general. They lack the certainty
and precision required by the established
rules of criminal pleading. It follows
that they are not good and sufficient in
law. They are so defective that no judg?
ment of conviction should be pronounced
upon them. The order, of the Circuit
Court arresting the judgment upon the
verdict is therefore affirmed, and the
cause remanded with instructions to dis?
charge the defendants. Mr. Justice
Clifford dissented from the opinion, but
concurred in the judgment.
THE KENTUCKY CASE.
The United States, plaintiff, vs. Hiram
Reese and Matthew Foushe, in error to
the Circuit Court of the United States for
the District of Kentucky, Mr. Chief Jus?
tice Waite delivered the opinion of the
court. This case comes here by reason
of a division of the opinion between the
judges of the Circuit Court in the District
of Kentucky. It presents an indictment
containing four counts, under Sections 3
and 4 of the act of May 31, 1870,16 Stat.
140, against two of the inspectors of the
municipal election in the State of Ken?
tucky, for refusing to receive and count
at such election the vote of Win. Garner,
a citizen of the United States of African
descent. All the questions presented by
the certificate of division arose upon gen-1
eral demurrers to the several counts of
the indictment.
In this court the United States aban?
don the first and third counts and ex?
pressly waive the consideration of all
claims not arising out of the enforcement
of the fifteenth amendment. The power
of Congress to legislate at all upon the
subject of voting at State elections rests
upon this amendment, and the inquiry
arises whether the act now under consid?
eration is "appropriate legislation" for its
enforcement Every man should be able
to know with certainty whether he is i
committing a crime, and it remains to be
considered whether a statute so general
in its provisions as this can be made
available for the punishment of those
who may be guilty of unlawful discrimi?
nation against citizens of the United
States while exercising the elective fran?
chise on account of their race, &c.
The question then to be determined is
whether we can introduce words of liui
tation into a penal statute so as to make
it specific, when as expressed it is gener?
al only. It would certainly be dangerous
if the Legislature could set a net large
enough to catch all possible offenders and
leave it to the courts to step inside and
gay who could be rightfully detained
and who should be set at large. This
would to some extent substitute the judi?
cial for the legislative department of the
government.
Congress is supreme and beyond the
control of the courts; but if it steps outside
of its constitutional limitations and at?
tempts that which is beyond its reach,
the courts are authorized to, and when
called upon in due course of legal pro?
ceedings must, annul its encroachments
upon the reserved power of the States
and the people. To limit this statute
in the manner now asked for would
be to make a new law, not to enforce an
old one. This is no part of our duty.
We must, therefore, decide that Congress
has not as yet provided by appropriate
legislation for the punishment of the of?
fence charged in the indictment, and that
the Circuit Court properly sustained the
demurrers and gave judgment for the
defendants.
This makes it unnecessary to answer
any of the other questions certified, since
the law gives the presiding judge the
casting vote in cases of division, and
authorizes a judgment in accordance with
his opinion. (Rev. stat., sec. 620.) If
we find that the judgment as rendered is
correct, we need not do more than affirm.
If, however, wc reverse all questions cer?
tified which may be considered in the
final determination of the case according
to opinion we express should be an?
swered. The judgment of the Circuit
Court is affirmed.
Dissenting, Mr. Justice Hunt. Mr.
Justice Clifford dissented from the opin?
ion, but concurred in the judgment.
What Constitutes a Good Fertilizer.
No ordinary cultivated plant can thrive
without a sufficient supply of each of a
number of substances needed for its food.
With an abundance of all of these in
forms in which the plant can use them,
and with other circumstances favorable,
the plant will flourish and the yield will
be large. But if the available supply of
one of them be too small, a light yield is
inevitable. Every ordinary soil contains
all of the ingredients of plant-food. In
"worn out" soils the available supply of
one or more of these is generally insuffi?
cient.
Fertilizers supply the plant with food
which the soil lacks. Barnyard manure
not only does this, but also improves the
soil as a living place for plants. Lime
and plaster (sulphate of lime) are neces?
sary as plant food, but, as fertilizers they
are chiefly valuable in rendering other
plant food available to crops. The in?
gredients of plant-food generally most
lacking in our cultivated soils, are nitro?
gen, phosphoric acid, and potash. The '
usefulness of guanos, superphosphates,
bone manures, poudrettes, potash salts,
and .other similar fertilizers, depends
mainly upon these ingredients. Such
fertilizers are generally more or less val?
uable in proportion as they contain larger
or smaller per centages of nitrogen, phos
phoric acid and potash, and as these are iu
form more or less available to the plant.
If all the other conditions for a profitable
crop of corn or turnips are fulfilled in a
soil, except that phospheric acid is difi
cient, then phosphoric acid must be sup?
plied. This may be done with bone,
which contains a large percentage of
phosphoric acid combined with lime as
"phosphate of lime."
Now, brother farmers will wish to
know what fertilizers to select. To de?
cide, he must first learn what bis soil
lacks, and then see where he can obtain
the needed ingredients in the best form
and at the lowest cost Whether his
land needs nitrogen* or phosphoric acid,
or potash, or all of these, he can best
learn, unless he has the experiments, on
a small scale, with high-grade phos?
phates, nitrogenous fertilizers, or potash
salts.
If he desires simply to enrich his land,
and is in no special hurry for ' a return,
let him select those which furnish the
largest amount of nitrogen or phosphoric
acid, or potash for his money. But if, as
be says, he wants a fertilizer to act quick?
ly, and bring bis crops'forward so as to
keep them out of the way of frost/ or
prepare them for an early market, let
him select superphosphates with a good
percentage of soluble phosphoric acid;
and nitrogenous manures, with the nitro?
gen in a readily available form, as nitrate
of soda, or sulphate of ammonia, or Peru?
vian guano; or if these are not easily to
be had, dried-blood, fish-scrap, or finely
pulverized, steam bone-dust.
Judge Mackey Charged With Be?
ing c0nspicuo8ly Inexact.?The Lan?
caster Ledger accuses Judge Mackey of
downright falsehood in. the statement
made by him to the Chester grand jury
of the facts and circumstances connected
with his discharge of the Lancaster grand
j ury. The Ledger says:
1st. The Court was not in session)when
the difficulty occurred, nor did the pre?
siding Judge know anything , of it until
about one hour after it did occur. And
he was then informed of it by the clerk
of the Court
2d. Consequently there was noycrowd
rushing from the Court House or through
the streets.
3rd. The editor of this paper visited
the wounded man in company with the
sheriff about one and a half hours after
the occurrence, and found his wound
dressed, and he comfortably sleeping in
his room at the hotel. There was no ex?
citement on the streets, and but very lit?
tle at the time the affair occurred.
4th. Gardner, who tbe Judge says is a
notorious desperado, is a young roan
about twenty years old. This is the first
difficulty we have ever known him to be
engaged in. The young man who was
shot was about the same age of Gardner,
and were intimate acquaintances. They
were both under the influence of liquor
at the time of the occurrence.
5th. The ball did not enter the head,
but entered the right side of the face, and
tame out on the left side of the nose.
6th. The facts (?) recited by Judge
Mackey were never made known to the
grand jury, and tbe Judge must have
picked them upon the streets or in his se?
cret caucuses.. '
7th. As to the dogs "licking tbe blood
of Gardner's victim*" such an expression
is characteristic of Judge Mackey. It is
unnecessary for us to contradict such a
statement. Every sane man knows that
it is not so.
8th. The Judge charges the grand jury
of Lrncaster with "a deliberate violation
of a most solemn oath." In other words,
that tbey have perjured themselves. . The
grand jury of Lancaster are made out of
different material from what we think
they are, if they do not give Judge
Mackey the opportunity to prove this as?
sertion in the Courts.
Cheer up.?Don't spend your time in
groaning over dull times, nor feel dis?
consolate over the future. Don't cross
the bridge until you come to it.
Don't growl but keep a cheerful coun?
tenance, speak encouragingly to your
neighbors, and thus seex to encourage
rather than depress those with whom you
come in contact.
If you are in debt, pay as much and as
fast as you can. No reasonable man
ought to expect more than this. But to
lock up money and refuse to pay your
honest debts, is a foolish and a wicked
thing; and this sort of work has done
more than anything to cause general dis?
trust, and to keep it up. This distrust of
one another is the real cause of the pres?
ent stagnation of business.
Finally let everybody do his best, pay
his debts as fast as he can, live economi?
cally, and wait for the good time. It
will come; money will begin to circulate
and business revive. Help to bring it
about by all you can do, and urge your
neighbors to do likewise and then watch,
wait and pray for the "Good time com?
ing."
? The grand jury of Polk Couuty,
Ga., besides attending in a faithful man?
ner to numerous other duties, thus ad?
monishes two editors: "We also feel it
our duty to censure the course and con?
duct of our two newspapers toward each
other, and urgently request the two edi?
tors to cease wrangling about themselves
and branch off into agricultural articles,
or others that will tend to develop the
interests and welfare of our cduntry."
? A few years ago you could sit up
and talk philosophy with a girl all night;
but now if you stay after one or two
o'clock in the morning the old people
begin to pound on the floor up stairs for
you to go. We don't mind it ourselves,
but we can't help feeling for the girls.