The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, January 27, 1876, Image 1
RATES OF SUBSCRIPTION.?Two DoiiLkBs
per annum, and One Dollak for six months.
Subscriptions are not taken for a less period
than six months.
Liberal deductions made to clubs of ten or
more subscribers.
RATES OF ADVERTISiyG.-Ono Dollar per
square ol one Inch for the first insertion, and Fifty
Cents per square for subsequent Insertions less than
three'months. Ko advertisement counted less
than" a square. ? n t <?
Liberal contracts will be made with those wishing
to advertise for three, six or twelve months. Ad?
vertising by contract must be confined to the im?
mediate ?usines.s of the firm or Individual contrac?
ting. -
Obituary Notices exceeding five lines, Tributes
of Respect, and all personal communications-'or
matters of individual interest, will be charged for
at advertising rates. Announcements of marriages
and deaths, and notices of a religious character, are
respectfully solicited, and will ba inserted gratis.
BY HOYT & CO. ANDERSON, S. O, THURSDAY, JANUARY 27,- 1876._VOL. XI-NO. 28.
LEGAL ADVERTISING.?"Wt ars compelled 1o
require cash paym tnts /or advertising ordered by
Executors, Administrators and other fiduciaries,
and herewith append the rates for the ordinary
notices, which will only be inserted when the
money comes rlthihe oroerj , >, - ? i ;
Citations, two insertions, ' - ''- - $3.00
Estate Notices, three Insertions, i ? ' - 5.00
Final Settlement.' five insertions - - 3.00
TO CORRESPONDENTS.?In order to receive
attention, communications must be accompanied
by the true name and address of the writer. Re?
jected manuscripts will not be returned, -unle? tho
necessary stamps are furnished to repay the postage
thereon. : ? . ??? ? (
6v~ We are not responsible for the views and
opinions of our correspondents.
All communications should be addressed to "Ed?
itors Intelligencer," and all checks, drafts, money
orders. Ac, should be made payable to the order
of HOYT & CO.,
Anderson, S. C.
BY "LA CAROLINE.'
CHAPTER HI.
"All that's bright must fade,
The brightest still the fleetest."
An early two o'clock dinner had been
hastily dispatched, and in the handsome,
dining-room of Dr. St. Julien's mansion,
alTwas B?sy and gay preparation. Under
Mammy Rachel's careful supervision the
massive' silver goblets, dishes, &c, had
been brightened until they looksd like
polished mirrors *i the snowy damask
cloth had been spread over the shining
mahogany table; delicate, transparent
china, and handsome cut glass, glittering,
with, prismaiic' colors had been arranged
comme it faut, and combining with the
handsome plate presented ah appearance
afroaee tefmed'vrrrd-efegantr - A youthfab
and mer^; grjitrr> K&(t gathered in the
dining-room to assist Mrs. Maham and
Mammy in the "fixing" of 'the supper
table. Ring aller ring of the door bell
had been answered, and very soon large
hampers from "Cuisine" and "Rouget"
had laden the table with "goodies" so
beautiful to the eye and delicious to the
taste, they would seem to have been pro?
duced by the magic wand of some fairy
godmother. ' p
Reader, permit me to try and describe
that richly spread board. Be patient
with a garrulous and childish old woman,
who loves to dwell upon the days .of
'Tang syne," and recall even the trifles
of toe past. Though, verily, in those
happy days that are forever gone, the
graceful arrangement of the festive board
was a matter of serious consideration
and innocent pride to our ladies. With
due deference to their importance, places
easy of access, and conspicuous for dis?
playing the grace of the carver, were left
for the juicy wcstphalia, the well roasted
turkies. ducks, guineas, &c., the tempting
fat, stewed oysters and the' nice, brown
maccaroni,-' while chicken salad, russes,
polonaises, cusfrirda, jellies, blancmanges,
?Sic., with large ice-cakes, as rich in flavor
and as white as bridal cakes, seemed to
take their places as if by intuition.?
There, too, in decanters of exquisite
Bohemian glass were wines of every va?
riety, in quality so rich and rare, they
would have rivalled the far-famed "wides
of Shivaz" and "the bright dew from
vineyards of the Green Sea gushing."
In the centre of the table stood the
crowning beauty of the whole?a tall
and glittering uteeple of crystal fruits of
various kinds, connected, or rather ce?
mented, in form of rings of crystalized
rose-colored sugar. Within this magical
sugared palace was placed a tall wax
candle which, when lighted at night,
gave a sparkling effect to the whole.
About half way between the crystal
tower (on each side of it) and the ends
of the table were flower stands of silver,
so contrived as when arranged with
flowers to 'give them the appearance of
pyramids?-these the children, when little
ones, called "flower steeples." It was in
the artistic arrangement of those stands
that Marion, Arthur, Jessie and Harry
were engaged when Rose was writing her
letter. At a side table Walter was em?
ployed in skilfully cutting up the chick?
en salad, while Annie handed him the
crisp green lettuce from a bowl of water;
her wee bit, dainty, fingers looking the
more delicate and rosy for the cool and
pleasant work. . . .
"Another ring at the bell," said Harry,
"I hope the sugar plums are coming, I
would like to finger them myself, for
Madame Rougets are always nonpa?
reils I"
The servant entered and handed Annie
a beautiful Etruscan vase, containing one
single magnificent camelia, and a card
with, "Mr* Richard Egan's compliments
to Miss St. Julien, and begs she will wear
his flower to-night."
"Wheugh!" whistled Harry; "Miss
St. Julien 1 fate Egan'!"
"Oh! how beautiful!" cried Jessie.
"I don't like Dick Egan," muttered
Arthur. And on Walter's serene brow
an unusal look of anxious thought res?
ted.
Annie blushed slightly, but with gen?
tle dignity she bade the grinning Tom
to take the rase and flower to the draw?
ing-room.
Only three hours before Annie St.
Julien had carried to her boudoir, and
placed tenderly and carefully with her
pretty fingers in water a bunch of sweet
violets and apple geranium leaves, which
Walter had given her with the whispered
words, "Their emblems are modesty and
preference, Annie."
"Why Harry! what are you doing?"
exclaimed Marion, in. consternation;
"you are not adorning' the flower stand,
at all, but Jessie's head, which is almost
bowed down by the weight of the wreath
you have placed upon it. And only see
how Jessie has crushed the beautiful
flowers in her frolic. Oh I it is too, too
bad of you! There were so many beau?
tiful flowers, and now I fear they will
scarcely hold out to form these pyramids,
and the vases in the drawing-room need
a few more to give a finishing grace.
Oh! Harry! oh! Jessie! you are incor?
rigible! I wish Rose would come and
help u?, she has an artist's eye and a
skillful hand."
"I will run and call Rose," said Jessie,
with a pretty pout, "for I am weary of
the work. Harry tumbles over the stand
every time I get it fixed anything liko
nice; he wants nothing but red flowers
on it. He i;t a real jockey "in his taste.
Cousin Alice says because I am a school
girl, a simple white dress would be most
'becoming to-night, but Harry says I
must wear my crimson cashmere, and
then I will sport his colors?the same
with which he decorated Sken a ken
when she won the quarter race last year.
I ::eel highly complimented," she said,
casting 9t tnisChiev?us, 'glaffce^t^HttfyT;
I vfill call Rose."
"Yes,' run, pray, Jessie?a Gordon to
the rescue!" cried the 'wild^and wilful
b?y.
"A Gordon! a Gordon!" echoed all,,
catching Harry's mirthful spirit.
"Right bravely, and always would I
respond to the cry of 'a Gordon to the
rescue,' might it be ever fair Rose Gor?
don," said Arthur. "Her's are the ten
derest blue, eyes, mine ever looked into?
the light of the soul beams from them,
and her complexion is so fair and soft it
makes one think, of the.bosom of a sea
shell" in which the white and pink are so
delicately blended."
? "Yes," said Marion, "eyes that beam
with the holy light of truth are always j
beautiful!"
"Truth and love I think it should be,"
sai? Walter, iotto voce to his help meet,
over the salad.
"What sort of light do mine beam, my
^oeiicsis?" said-Harry, shutting hiseyes j
tightly, and pushing his. roguish face into
Marion's. .
"The light of boyish folly," she said,
passing her hand lovingly over the closed
eyes, and in tones of playful sweetness,
pronouncing the words, "Open, sesame!"
Wide open came the bright, frank, merry
blue eyes, and around his sister's Blender
waist the boyish arms were flung, and a
ringing, smacking kiss resounded through
the room.
"Oh! Harry I you nearly knocked over
that charlotte russe," said the blushing,
girl, extricating herself from his fervid
embrace. "But here comes Rose 1"
"Welcome, fair Rose, loveliest of Flora's
charming train!" said Arthur, with gay
gallantry, meeting Rose and his sister at
the door; "the on dit is that you well
understand the graceful art of placing
these garden and green house beauties to
please the eye of your gentle mistress,
la belle Flora. But what can we do
with this wild-wood graft?" he said,
pointing to Jessie, who was already mis?
chievously pinning Walter and Annie
together with a broad blue ribbon, while
they remained amusingly unconscious of
the trick, so earnest were they in the
engagement of a pleasant tete a Me.
Mrs. Maham now came to their aid, by
sending Harry and Jessie to feed the
canaries, which had been forgotten on
that busy afternoon. And very soon
after, Marion and Rose, with Arthur's
help, had formed the beautiful flower
steeples of the sweet-Bcented heliotropes,
crimson and white japonicas, bright gera?
nium blossoms, with their tender, fra?
grant leaves, delicately perfumed, tea
roses and many other flowers which, in
that soft and temperate climate, are not
uncommon even in December.
The arrangement of the table being
completed to their satisfaction, 'they
passed through the elegant suite of
rooms thrown open for the reception
of the guests, giving finishing touches to
curtains and vases; then, like wild birds
on the wing, the happy girls flew up
stairs to make their evening toilettes,
and, girl like, they collected in one room
?"Annie's bower," as they affectionately
called it.
Reader, have you ever been a happy,
gay, light-hearted girl? Then you have
not forgotten the delight with which
jewels, ribbons, laces and dresses were
laid out for display, previous to the wear?
ing ; how their merits were discussed and
their colors blended. You have not, per?
haps, forgotton either the quick throb of
your heart, as the pleasing form of some
manly youth rose before bright fancy's
vision, and that heart anxiously ques?
tioned: "Will he admire?"
After fully enjoying the mysterious,
undefinable and womanly pleasure of
"dressing," our young friends were all
successfully, becomingly and gracefully
attired. Jessie wore the crimson dress
to please Harry, and in the clasp of An?
nie's broach was firmly fastened Walter's
little blue violets and geranium leaves.
As was her usual custom, Annie sought
her father in his library for a kiss of
approval and a look of loving admira?
tion before the arrival of their guests.
"Papa, dear Papa!" she exclaimed as
she entered the room, "how do you like
my dress ? and is your Annie beautiful
in your eyes to-night ?"
"Your father was called out a few min?
utes since," said Walter Maham, rising
from the Doctor's arm chair.
"0, Walter! how vain and foolish you
must think me!" sho 6aid, blushing deep?
ly; "but.it pleases Papa to have me
chatter so to him."
Who could accuse Annie St. Julien of
yanity ? Surely, not one who has known
her, even in childhood, and prizes her
lowly, gentle spirit, as in very truth it is
her "gracing grace."
"I thank you, dear Annie, for wearing
my humble flowers in preference to
Egan's splendid camelia. I must con?
fess I was jealous of his beautiful japoni
ca, fearing it would prove a powerful
rival for my homely little violets. One
suit granted,- beggar-like I prefer an?
other-"
"Oh, no! oh, no 1 how could you think
so, Walter? Apart from my preference
for the modest little violet, how could
you think Mr. Egan's gift could be pre?
ferred to that of the earliest and dearest
friend of my childhood ? But what is
your request?"
"I was jealous, Annie, because I have
learned to feel for you an affection warm?
er than friendship?I would ask you to
be my wife, sweet Annie; say, darling,
will you be mine, my wee bit, bonnie
bride?"
"Have you no word for me, sweet
one?" he continued, as Annie, pale and
agitated, remained perfectly silent.?
"Life will be so dreary?joys bring no
brightness and sorrows hard to bear
without my Annie's love 1 Annie, darl?
ing, little one, pet of my boyhood, sweet
love, grant me three words, only say,
'I lovo you.'"
"Y<s, Walter, I know it how, I love
you! out papa, dear papa! my own, my
poor papa! I cannot L;ave him!" she
said, impetuously, her beautiful eyes fill?
ing with tears.
"I will not have you love your father
less, dearest. It will be one of my great?
est pleasures to assist you in making hira
happy. I would be to him a dutiful.and
affectionate son. Annie, sweet-heart, the
love I plead for cannot rob your father c>f
his child's love or duty."
"I k"ow not," she tinswered, sadly,
"papa says I am his all s ince dear mam?
ma died; and, oh, Walter, I would not
cost him, my precious papa, one sad
thought! He is so lov Lug and so good
to me 1"
"Then, Annie, !? must plead my suit
with him. I will beg hin to give me his
little girl for my darling wife. I will re?
mind him of his own young love, and
ask him if he can depri ve his child and
her lover of a life-joy so intense and fer?
vent as that of hearts ud ited by the holy
ties of wedded love."" ? ~
"No, Walter, papa will deny me noth?
ing/ but I fear 'it will grieve him r and,
oh, no, he must not tt ink it requires
anything like sacrifice "o give up even
you for his sake. You have indeed
awakened me from a dream! I called
you my best loved elder brother, bot I
know now it was no sister's love I gave;
it has grown with me from my childhood,
and I love you as a weman only once
ever loves. You have stirred emotions,
and awakened feelings to-night which
can only die with me! Yes, it is joy,
deep and intense, but there is pain and
sadness, too, mingled with the bliss?
such pain and sadness as all changes
bring. To-night I am conscious the girl
has lbecome a woman. But the bell
rings, I must meet our gt ests, and leave
these most weighty questions to be dis?
cussed another time," site said, holding
out her hand and smiling half gayly and
half sadly.
He kissed her hand, and so they parted
to meet in the brilliant assembly; to pass
the light jest and well-turned compliment,
with brows as serene and mannen, as
calm as if the warm bret.th of love had
not swept over the chords of their hearts,
and awakened their deepest and sweetest
melodies.
[to be continued.]
For tile Anderson Intelligencer.
Anderson, S. C, Jan. 17,1876.
"But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thy head
and wash thy face."?Matt. 6:7. .
Be perfectly natural. Be yourself at
Church, and at home, in worship, and in
work; for you have an inner self that
would neither carry a yoke nor an aus?
terity out of season?a substantial, na?
tive self that rebukes the shams of taste,
of morals and of piety. When thou
fastest, hunt up no sad countenance dif?
ferent from thine own, nor put on an ex?
terior* solemnity to which thy heart plays
truant. Religion is Gospel. It is not
the executioner with his axe, but the
herald with a pardon. Let us not deport
ourselves toward the munificence as we
might toward the wrath of the King.
"Anoint thy head and wash thy face."
(Jod does not propose to kill thee, nei?
ther hast thou any commission to prove
to the world that thou art more holy than
the rest of men. Never has this ex?
quisite sentiment, "who am the .least of
all saints," ever been inferred by observ?
ers from lugubrious countenances and
mysterious manipulations. v
But, then, let us not rush into the op?
posite extreme of lightness and vanity,
scarcely dissembled. How beautiful!
What unction, what fragrance hath it ?
Gravity without pomp; solemnity with?
out demureness, commingled with joy
without lightness. 0! what a mistake
to be sad, or sour, or cynical in Church I
What jarring discords these with notes
of overture and promise, with emotions
of love, gratitude and hope ! An orien?
tal did not anoint when he was mourn?
ing, but when he received a guest or be?
came a gueet. In the sanctuary we are
God's guests. The entertainment is His,
the viands from his garner. If you were
annoyed with a spot on the garment of
your fellow-guest, it would betray more
of an appetite for flaws .an celestial
food. Would yon pick a quarrel with
your neighbor in the King's chamber ?
Would it be the time to mend a rent in
his garment ? Didst thou invite him ?
Somehow, the world has got lost about
religious manners. We mourn when we
ought to rejoice, and we rejoice when we
ought to mourn. We Have levity when
we sin, and sadness when we worship
God. We go to Church to converse
about the state of the market, and our
finest expositions of Church themes are
heard amid the hurry and inspiration of
market duty. Anoint thy head and wash
thy face when thou fastest, and both at
the Church door and within, be careful
not to soil the manners or adulterate the
joy of the guest.
? A New York letter says: "Mer?
chants who have been selling largely to
the South within the past six and nine
ruontns report collections from all that
quarter as very satisfactory, except from
Louisiana, where they are rather back?
ward. There have been few or no fail?
ures of late, except in New Orleans and
Montgomery, Ala., and even these latter
were of but comparatively little account.
The people generally have more money
than they have had at any time since the
war, and the indicatioris are, therefore,
that the Southern influence will soon be
favorably felt on tho early spring trade."
? Among the many evidences of prog?
ress, during the year that has gone, .that
in political affairs should not bo over?
looked. Sixteen States have held elec?
tions the past year. The aggregate vote
is 1,923,111 Democratic und 1,907,623 Re?
publican, a Democratic majority of 15,
818. A comparison of this vote with that
of 1873 in the same States shows that in
that year the Democrats had 1,710,487,
and the Republicans 1,830,863 votes, thus
evidencing a Democratic gain of 129,094.
? The Marquis of Ripon, tho English
nobleman who recently embraced the
Roman Catholic faith, and who was at
the time Grand Master of Masons in
England, has lately presented the Pope
with 850,000. His lodge dues would
scarcely have reached : Iiis amount for
many years.
WHEPPEIfS CONDEMNATION.
His Tirade Agalust Chamberlain and
the Newspapers.
The full tex; of Whipper'a speech ap?
pears in the joarnal of the House of Rep?
resentatives for Tuesday, January 18th.
He rose to a question of privilege, and
said:
Mr. Speaker, in stating my question of
privilege, I shall not occupy the time of
this Houfie, nor annoy myself by stating,
in detail, the matter that is familiar to
you all, as it is to every school boy
throughout the length and breadth of the
land. A few weeks ago, by a vote of this
House, I and with others were elected as
Judges, and since that time theJVew? and
Courier, together with other journals,
have heralded all over this country ru?
mors ot a most damaging character.
Under ordinary circumstances I would
not make the slightest reply, but I feel it
is due to the members of this body who
supported me; it is due to myself, and I
feel that :it is d ue to the public, in whose
ears theso rumors have been ringing for
almost four weeks. I have.no other
means of replying to these defamatory
articles, interviews and speeches that
have permeated and poisoned the air
from Maine to Texas, from the Bay of
Fundy to California, as malicious as they
are unjust;. It is nothing new, it is true,
for any man, however limited his public
life may be, to be abused. It seems to be
a peculiar characteristic of newspapers to
do so; and even Washington, when ho
was President, was slandered in the worst
possible manner, and the best men, of
whom thiii country can boast have been
maligned and slandered in every possible
way. I could boar with it if it were not
a duty that I feel I owe to those to whom
I am indebted?to those who elected me
?to resent it.
Those who have thought proper to de?
fame and accuse me, and these to whom I
shall address my remarks are, first, the
Newa and Cbwier as a newspaper, and
Daniel H. Chamberlain as an individual.
Mr. Rice rose to a point of order, that
the gentleman was speaking to a question
not affecting him as a member of the
House of Representatives.
The Speaker ruled the point not well
taken,?for the reason that if the charges
made against Mr. Whipper were true, his
right to sit as a member of the House of
Representatives; could be questioned, as j
the House of Representatives has the
right to judge not only of f;he elections
and returns for its members, but also of
their qualifications, moral as well as con?
stitutional.
Mr. Whipper: I sha.ll not be surprised
at any ten derfootedness from that side of
the House. I have privileges upon this
floor, and I believe they will be accorded.
Mr. Rice: I raised the point, not out
of any personal feeling, for had I been
present I tihould have voted for you in
preference to the present incumbent, (J.
P. Reed).
Mr. Whipper: I thank the gentleman
for the kindly feeling he expresses to?
ward me, but it has passed beyond that,
and. I am not speaking particularly of
what has been said against myself; but
after what has been said, there is nothing
that I can iot discuss with impunity un?
der a question of privilege. There is not
a man in ihe Democratic party who has
not done everything in his power to in?
jure me aiid deceive those who supported
me on the 16th of December last, so that
I feel there is scarcely anything I can say
but what would be in defense of what has
been said against me, and what has come
to the knowledge of every member here,
and every member is familiar with it.
At the time I was interrupted. I said I
proposed to address myself on this ques?
tion particularly to the News and Courier
as a journal, and to Daniel H. Chamber?
lain as a man. In this fight they appear
to be strangely united, which is the last
thing that v\ e should have ?ixpected; but
this alliance is a fact well established and
endorsed, and I will show its formation,
and see upon what foundation it stands.
We have only to go back to the second
day of October a year ago, (and I have
the authority for what I say); "that same
paper sty] eel Daniel H. Chamberlain a
thief, and said he was responsible for the
issue of six millions of bonds, and
foisted them upon the people of this
State." They hurled over the country
that he who was by law appointed to
Erotect the State, instead of aping so, by
is advice and direction fis an officer of
the law, and as an officer of the special
Financial Board, placed upon the market
these bonds. I have the Newt and Cou?
rier'? authority for saying he did it. The
Neidt and Courier now lauds him to the
skies. Why this strange association, if
Daniel H. Chamberlain was responsible
for the issue of six million dollars of
bonds two years ago ? By what process
is he now an innocent man ?
How can they join hands for the pur?
pose of opposing those who have been
elacted to positions they don't want them
to occupy? It has a strange meaning to
me. One gentleman went so far, and the
Newt and Courier copied his speech, as to
say that Daniel H. Chamberlain, by his
acts, imposed on this State six millions
of bonds; and if by any proposition he
can extricate himself, let him do it. The
Netos and Courier published it, and I
have it before me now, and yet the lips
of Daniel H. Chamberlain have been
silent to this day. I only speak of this
that I may get at the character of my ac?
cusers.
Mr. Speaker, this is what they have
said about Daniel H. Chamberlain, and
it would be needless for me to say it is
from the Democratic side; but to say
what Daniel H. Chamberlain has said
about them, would be to charge them
with everything that would imply venali?
ty, corruption, and everything that his
imagination, and it is a very fertile one,
could suggest. I have not looked at
them from my standpoint, but from their
own. The only thing that pains me is,
that they painted each other so black
that I have no language that will deepen
the color.
They have charged me with corruption
generally. I make no pretentions to
being a saint. There are few men who
attain perfection in this world. I will
tell you what the offenses I am charged
with by them are, and I inteL" to talk of
those who but yesterday were opposing
each other.
They make charges about the Land
Commission. Mon in office, connected
with such an important office as the Land
Commission, are supposed to keep accu?
rate accounts of what business they trans?
act. These charges are not made specific,
and. in face of the generality of the
charges they cannot expect the answer to
be more specific. I say I have had no
connection with the Land Commissson
that I would not gladly and willingly
have made public. I never sold, so far
as *hcir records show, a piece of land to
that Commission. My transactions were
legitimate and honorable, and I am will?
ing that they ?should be subjected to a
most searching examination^ and I will
furnish them more information than the
records will. If they want examination,
they may have it; and in connection
with this examination, I will couple the
I two together?the Land Commission and
I the Sinking Fund.
I s hould be glad at this time to discuss
my individual connection with both of
them if I felt that I would be safe in so
doing. If I felt that no advantage would
be taken of my words, I would gladly un?
bosom myself so far as my connection
with those transactions go. Some two
years ago a Committee was appointed to
inquire into one of these Commissions.
I went before it and used my own lan?
guage, and that language has served them
the purpose of raising the howl that went
from one end of the land to the other,
and yet no man, not even Daniel H.
Chamberlain, much as he boasts of his
learning and legal lore, has been able to
put his finger upon one single illegal
transaction of mine, notwithstanding I
have stood and ever shall place myself in
defiance of my calumniator. I call upon
him to name one. When before that
Committee I answered every question
fairlv as it.was put, yet they have been
busiiy engaged since in spreading it over
the world that I am a defaulter. If I am,
I say they are derelict in their duty as
officers. I am aware that the machinery
is being completed to convict me and
others; that the Jury Commissioners are
being changed, and that juries are being
organized for conviction if they can get
one. I do not propose 'to put anything
in their mouths that they can use against
me. There is no transaction of mine
that I am not willing to meet. But I
pass from this. I am charged with igno?
rance and incapacity.
Mr. Speaker, that is a question that
this House passed upon in the election,
and there I leave it; but the men who
make this charge are not fearful of my
failure on the bench through ignorance
or incapacity, when I take my position,
but it is success that they are afraid of.
Could they convince themselves in their
wildest imagination that defeat would be
brought about by ignorance and incapac?
ity, they would not now raise this cry
against me, for that would be sufficient
ground, in the first place, for impeach?
ment, and. secondly, it would be the sum-'
mit of their ambition to see a negro fail,
and thus banish from their visions the
horrors of negro Judges for all coming
time.
The next charge is malignancy and
venality. Mr. Speaker, it seems to me
that it comes in bad taste, indeed, for a
newspaper like the Neios and Courier,
that has, itself, shown such an amount of
spleen, or from a man like Daniel H.
Chamberlain, who has shown such hatred
and ingratitude, to charge any man with
malignancy and venality. If the Newt
and Courier is to be believed, there could
not be a more venal man than Daniel H.
Chamberlain walking God's earth. I
hestitate not to say that the very floors of
the News and Courier's building, the walls,
the roof that protects them, were pur?
chased with money rung, illegally, lrom
the tax-payers, and will stand forth as a
monument of their venality so long as the
walls shall last. These are the men who
are talking about venality and corrup?
tion. This paper that talks about my
venality has, since reconstruction, been
bought and sold oftcner than a negro
slave in ante bellum days.
But, Mr. Speaker, I have been charged
with being a drunkard. I make no re
Ely tc that. X feel that I am too well
nowa. I have spent ten years amongst
those whom I now address. If in your
judgment it is true, give the News and
Courier and Daniel H. Chamberlain
credit for telling the truth once; if it is
not true, simply pass it by.
I am also charged with being a gam?
bler. I have been. This I place in the
past tense. I do not propose to deny
anything that is or has been true. My
gambling belongs to the degenerate days
of tho past, ana they are gone forever.
Almost one year ago, in the presence of
my minister, with the congregation
around me, I pledged my God that they
were gone forever. My :name was regis?
tered in the Episcopal Church?the vow
recorded in heaven. I feel that God has
forgiven me, and care not for the men
who are now circulating these rumors to
injure me and deceive ycu.
Now, Mr. Speaker, taking it in the
light of all they have said, the men who
have said it, and what these men have
said, one about the other, the difference
that has existed, is it reasonable to be?
lieve that these are the real causes of
their abuse? I answer, No f
Mr. Speaker, the great trouble with the
Democracy in this State is that they see
a growing power passing from their grasp.
They announced it in their resolutions at
Hibernian Hall. They admit that by the
election of Moses, Wigjrin and myself,
the loiver country, possessing more than
onc-hiilf the Republican voters in the
State, has passed from their control. In
one of those circuits, within the last year,
with a Conservative Judge, they had es
tablislled a terrorism little less than that
of Jelfries. It was not that they had
anything against any particular man, but
they had already laid their plans for
three Conservative Judges in those cir?
cuits, and through intimidation and fraud
to carry the State, but these plans were
spoiled, and they are frank enough, or
rather fool enough, to admit it them?
selves,
Mr. Speaker, the great blow was aimed.
I believe, at myself, and that Wiggin and
Moses were linked on as an apology, that
the world would not believo that they
were fighting me on account of my color.
So far as Judge Wiggin is concerned,
they know, as we all do, as we are well
acquainted with him, that the charges
are as false as they are malicious.
So far as Judge Moses is concerned, I
am not here in his defence. If he were
a member of this House he would defend
himself. I do not hesitate to say that
whatever may have been his career, they
could not paint it blacker, nor in more
glaring colors, than the News and Courier
painted Daniel H. Chamberlain. Taking
the administration of the two men, the
one they are trying to abuse and the one
they are lauding to the skies, the facts
will show that almost every measure
looking to reform in the State had its
origin during the administration of Moses.
I am not here with any bleaching pro?
cess to wipe away his sins or foibles.
With regard to him, they say it can be
proven that he was purchased, to sell out
the Republican party at an hour when
Daniel H. Chamberlain was struggling
for supremacy. They say that Moses
proved untrue, but they are the last men
in God's world that ought to make those
charges, for it could never have been
done without their assistance, and wc are
reminded in that prayer that we arc taught
to utter, that we should not lead each
other into temptation, and if they took
advantage of a weakness they should be
silent forever.
At the formation of the Republican
[>arty in this State, whsn we were at a
oss for material, F. J. Moses came to the
rescue, and wc had a right to look upon
him with suspicion, on account of his
birth, his education, his surroundings,
and the social ostracism that it would
bring upon him. There was nothing to
commend him to the hearts of the Re?
publicans, who must therefore have
found some real merit or good traits in
his character. Daniel H. Chamberlain,
on the other hand, came to U6 boasting
of his New England birth, his early edu?
cation, his war record, and his adhesion
to the principles taught by a Garrison, a
Sumner, a Wilson, a Whittier, and that
host of heroes that had adorned the land
of his birth, and yet from the hour that
he took his seat as Governor of South
Carolina he has never failed to betray a
political friend or favor a political ene?
my. Is there anything blacker than this?
Swift says: "He that calls a man un?
grateful sums up all the evil that a man
can be guilty of," and I pronounce Dan?
iel H. Chamberlain the most ungrateful
wretch that ever walked the earth, or
breathed the air of heaven.
The ghost in Hamlet, when he appear?
ed to bis son, announced that he was con?
demned to walk by night and be confined
:ln fire by day until all the crimes done
in nature were burned and purged away.
If that doctrine is true, and the edict
should go forth-that DanielH. Chamber?
lain and F. J. Moses, Jr., should expiate
their political crimes, Moses would be a
saint in heaven when Daniel H. Cham?
berlain would be in hell howling.
I pass from this. I do not believe that
the charges made were intended for ei?
ther Moses or Wiggin; the real thrust
was aimed at the negro, who has been
the source of trouble for almost a cen?
tury in this country, both in Church
and State, in the halls of Congress, in
Sabbath schools, stage coaches and rail?
road cars. He could not even walk the
streets without insult or injury. Just so
long as he stands ready with brush in
hand to black boots, or play the part of
cookjjor waiter, this prejudice will not
manifest itself; so long as he can be
called by the familiar names of Sam,
Dick or Jake. But just as soon as he
raise,? his head above the position of a ?
menial, he is made the object of Demo?
cratic spleen all over the country; It
comes from that class of men and from
that name spirit that, in 1860, brought a
war upon tnis country and cost the North
half a million of her bravest sons, and
that spirit that cost the South about an
equal number of the flower of her youth
and manhood. It .will exist, until this
class will be taught to respect real worth
and manhood without regard to race or
color. We have met this prejudice be?
fore. It was this spirit that murdered
Lovejoy on the banks of the Missouri;
that fractured the skull of Benjamin
Lundey, in the streets of Baltimore;
dragged William' Lloyd Garrison by the
:aeck through the streets of Boston. It
caused the many riots that has blackened
che history of the cities of New York,
Philadelphia, Detroit and elsewhere. We
iaave also met it here with the lust for
power added to it, which has resulted in
: he murder of hundreds, among whom
are Dill, Martin, Randolph and a host of
others.
But, Mr. Speaker, I rely upon the Re?
publican party to meet the exigency in
lihe future as it has in the past.
When this spirit became so rife as to
cause the Southern members in the Na?
tional Halls of legislation to throw off
their official robes and return to their
homes, the Republican party maintained
its dignity. They came'norae and worked,
themselves up into a frenzy, just like the
old Charleston fossils did at Hibernian
Hall a few nights ago, one of whom,
when he was fifteen years younger, no
mule team could drag into the war.
They get together and talk fight, but I .
dp not believe they mean it.
After the issues of the war were settled,
we met this same spirit, and within sound
of my voice, but not in this House, they
passed what were, known, as the black
laws, for they were blacker than the an?
gels of hell. Again the Republican party
came to the rescue, and the question was
put as to how they could best protect the
negroes, and they put them in a position
to protect themselves by putting into
their hands the ballot.
That errors have been committed, we
do not deny, but it is an historic fact that
errors have been committed in all govern?
ments. That a people situated as we
were, surrounded by disaffection, spleen
and prejudice on the one side, and on the
other by the treachery of such meu as
Daniel H. Chamberlain, that - we should
have committed errors, should naturally
be expected. With all our errore, we
have yet a Republican party in South
Carolina which they sought to destroy ;
and that it should. stand. up before them
to-day in a more powerful shape than it
has ever done, is the cause of all their
weeping and whining.
This man, Daniel H. Chamberlain, has
been placed in a position that he is re?
quired by law to commission those who
are elected officers of the State. He is
playing into the hands of the Democracy
by refusing to do that which the Consti?
tution requires of him; and many ask
what is to be done in this emergency.
I am far from having any fears tor the
result of his action in this case. I will
not enter into a discussion of the legal
aspect of this matter. Daniel H. Cham?
berlain is required by the constitution to
sign the commissions of all State officers,
and when he comes to the conclusion
that he will not perform that which the
laws require of him, he places himself in '
the position of a perjured wretch. It is
one of those cases in which any black?
hearted traitor can attempt to defeat the
will of the people, but I take it that the
will of the people cannot be defeated,
and the man who undertakes to establish
anarchy and confusion assumes the re?
sponsibility of bringing about a revolu?
tion in any government of which he may
form a part; and if the constitution re?
quires him to sign a commission, when
he refuses he places himself in the posi?
tion of a perjured villain, and in the
position of a traitor to the will of the
people. He may be able to purchase the
Democratic journals to sustain him, and
even buv the silence of Republican
journals, but this will not serve his pur?
pose.
The great cosmopolitan idea of liberty
is too deeply seated in the hearts of the
American people ever to permit one man
to set himself above the law and assume
to dictate to those who have elevated him'
to place and power. The spirit that, in
the reign of Charles I, overturned the
throne, stripped the altar of its orna?
ments, beheaded the King and declared
Cromwell Lord Protector is still abroad
in the land, and has grown stronger with
the advance of civilization, and should
be a warning to usurpers a.nd traitors.
When the time comes, I propose to be
equal to the occasion. I know their in?
tention is to drive us to the Courts; but,
so far as I am concerned, if I go to the
Courts, I will be as the respondent. We
will obtain a commission on which we
can qualify, even though hie official signa?
ture may be withheld. I care not what
the consequences may be; I will assume
the position to which I have been elected,
unless prevented by law or relieved by
death.
It has bocn said that I have entertained
the idea of resigning, but I would sooner
die than resign; not for the value that I
place upon the office, but because Daniel
H. Chamberlain has attempted to compel
it by an unholly alliance with the De?
mocracy. Can Ave resign in the face of
the charges made and circulated over the
country by Chamberlain and his Demo?
cratic allies, that wc are corrupt, igno?
rant, malignant and guilty of every vice
and crime in the calendar?
Mr. Speaker, I feel it is a duty that I
owe to myself, to the limited family of
which I am a member, to the race to
which I belong, to jxwterity and, above
all, to my God, to spurn indignantly
every proposition to resign, especially
when proposed by iiuch parties as the
News and Courier and Daniel H. Cham?
berlain.
When the low black schooner sailed
up the James River, bearing its human
cargo of thirty-six negroes, it was not
expected that one of their descendants,
or of those who followed, would ever ask
to be made a Trial Justice, much more a
Judge. They were brought here as
slaves, and slaves they were for "almost
two centuries and a half, until God in
his infinite' wisdom burst the bonds that
held them down, arid they are rapidly
rising and asserting their manhood. In
their endeavors to do so, I have been one
favored with an honorable position, not
by them alone, for in that: vote many
white Republicans joined. I appreciate
the favor and feel the responsibility that
attaches thereto. I have said all that I
desire to say about the injuries that have
been done me.
I know when I shall have concluded
my question of privilege there wiH be a
howl raised, and I know the source from
which that howl will come. It shall
hereafter pass me as the idle wind that I
regard not. I appeal from the prejudices
and vituperation of the present to the
calm and dispassionate judgment of the
future for that vindication that I feel I
deserve, and I feel assured that nothing
that a venal or corrupt press or a mali?
cious or ungrateful man like Daniel H.
Chamberlain has said or can say will
either injure me or deceive you.
So far as the Neics and Couiier is con-'
cerned, their very sanctum reeks with
the foulest corruption, and nothing truly
respectable or descent can be expected to
emanate from that source. So far as
Daniel H. Chamberliun is concerned, I
regard him as unfit for earth; to heaven
he cannot ascend' and were he to make
his advent in hell, I fear he would incur
the displeasure of his Satanic Majesty.
Veto of the Blackvllle-Barnwell Bill.
Hon. R. B. Elliott, Speaker House o/Rep
? resentatives:
Sip.?I return herewith, without ap?
proval, to the House of Representatives,
in which it originated, an act entitled
"An act to locate and establish the coun?
ty seat of Barnwell County at Black
ville."
This act is the late: t of a long series of
proceedings in the General Assembly, as
well as in the courts of the State, having
for their object the transfer of the county
seat of Barnwell County from the Village
of Barnwell to the Village of Black ville.
These efforts bei ran in the session of the
General Assembly for 1868-69, and it
may be said that they have been contin?
ued without interruption to the present
time.
At the last session of the General As?
sembly an act was passed directing an
election to be held by the people of Barn?
well County, for the purpose of determin?
ing the location of the county seat The
election was held on the 12th day of
May, 1875. The ballot boxes, with the
other evidences of this election, were de?
posited in the office of the clerk of the
court at Barnwell Village, but before the
canvass of the election was made by the
commissioners of election, the ballot
boxes were taken from their place of de?
posit, and the ballots and other evidences
of the election were destroyed. The
commissioners of the election being de?
prived of the means of canvassing or de?
claring the election, declined to take any
further action as a board, and at a sub?
sequent period the board of State can?
vassers, acting upon certain fragmentary
evidence in the form of affidavits of some
of the managers of the election, declared
that a majority of the votes at said elec?
tion had been cast in favor of the Village
of Black ville as the county seat. There?
upon some of the county officers removed
their office from Barnwell to Blackville,
and a writ of mandamus to compel their
return to Barnwell Village was asked for
before Hon. J. J. Maher, the judge of
that circuit. Judge Maher granted the
writ, holding in substance that the action
of the board of State canvassers was un?
authorized and void, and could give no
validity to the election. An appeal was
thereupon taken by the defeated party to
the Supreme Court of the State. No
judgment in this case has yet been filed
in that court, though the furtberants of
both sides of the controversy have ex
Sressed to me their conviction that the
ecision must be a dismissal of the ap
5eal, thus sustaining the decision of
udge Maher. .
The next step has, however,. been the
passage of the act which I now return.
The case thus presented has many as?
pects inviting attention, but the most
conspicuous feature which it presents is
the abandonment of the courts where it
had been carried on, and the effort to ac?
complish by summary legislation the re?
sult which had been defeated: by the
courts. Three points seem apparent:
First, that it was one year ago regarded
by the present defeated party to this con?
troversy proper and necessary to submit
the controversy to .he decision of the
people of the county at a popular elec?
tion. Second, that new, not satisfied with
the results of the election and the decis?
ion of the ablest courts of this State, it is
regarded as necessary to success by the
same party to abandon the election, dis?
regard the decisions of the courts, and
summarily take by legislation what
neither the election nor the courts nor
the existing laws have given them.?
Third, that the preseut defeated party
have a full remedy for any wrongs suf?
fered by them under the existing laws
and in the courts.
I am unable to discover how justice or
equity or fair dealing can be held to sup?
port the passage of the present act. If a
popular election one year ago was the
fair mode of controversy, it is the fair
mode now. While I should regret the
necessity of any further act of legislation
touching this question, I could certainly
give my consent to an act ordering an?
other election far more readily than to
any other mode of settling the controver?
sy. If the party whose interests this act
promoted have been robbed of their
righ s under the last election, as is al?
leged, is that a valid reason why the
General Assembly should undertake to
settle the question by summary legisla?
tion ? Is this the only election at which
wrorigs have been done? If such a view
is to prevail, then all local elections
might by the same hat be transferred to
the General Assembly. If one party to
any municipal election should feel itself
aggrieved at the result, it might ask the
General Assembly to intervene and de?
clare one party elected. All such legis?
lative action is almost universally consid?
ered unwise, partisan and exceedingly
dangerous as a precedent. It really
strikes a blow at the very princi?
ples of popular elections and the sover?
eignty of the people, in their primary
capacity, to settle their own local contro?
versies. A few yean ago a style of leg?
islation was in vogue which consisted in
transferring the powers of local officers
to be elected by the people to the central
control of the Legislature. I only state
what is the verdict of nearly all men
now, that such legislation is pernicious
in effect, and wholly contrary to the spir-'
it of our Govern men t and Institutions.
Popular elections have a thousand
times failed to express the real popular
will, owing to undue influences or dis?
honest practices. Shall we then abandon
popular elections and centre all powers
now exercised by the people at the ballot
box in a central legislative body? What
has Barnwell County done, I ask, that
she shonld now be deprived of her accus?
tomed rights ? Grant that bad men have
burned ballot boxes. Grant if necessary
that the preseni, defeated party have lost
their rights. For all this, shall the peo?
ple of this county no longer nave a voice
in settling their most important domestic
affairs ? What, I respectfully ask, do the
members of the General Assembly really
know of the real wishes or interests of
the people of Barnwell County respecting
the present question? What does the
Governor know? Leave this question
to the people, to whom it belongs, and
they will settle it by the ordinary agen?
cies of popular elections and the courts.
But all these considerations, so weighty
and conclusive, are made tenfold more
binding on me, when it is remembered
that the door of relief from wrong, to
both parties to this controversy, is still
open. If the refusal of the commissioners
of election to canvass the election or to de?
clare its result is a wrong to either party,
there is a clear present legal remedy to the
party wronged; a remedy so plain, that
nobody willmistakc it. The refusal of one
party to abide the test of the courts does
not suggest to me any increased confidence
in the justice of their cause. I havcatoo
much respect for the courts to be wilrrng
to seem to decline to abide by the result
of their decision when fairly and regular?
ly made. Up to the present time it is
an unquestionable fact that the decisions
of the courts are adverse to the decision
made by the present act.
There are other more general and per?
haps more important considerations
which induce me to decline to approve
the present act. They relate to what I
believe to be the general effects upon the'
welfare of the people of Barnwell County.
I do not think the present act, from the
best information I can gather, .will tend
to promote this best interests of that
county. On the contrary, I think it is
calculated to disturb the harmony and
hinder the prosperity of that county.?
I well understand how great is the per?
sonal and political feeling aroused by
this controversy. It would be easy to
find partisan reasons on either side, but
that is not my duty. My duty is to act
impartially in view of what seems to me
to be justice on both sides. Justice to
both sides, in my best judgment, requires
me, so far as my action can effect it, to
remit this question back to the people of
the county, there to be determined to the
end by the agencies of the courts or by
another resort to a popular election if the
courts shall finally decide that the last
election was not valid, or did not, for any
cause, express t he will of the people.
Very rjspectfully, |
D. H. Chambeblai>\
Governor South Carolina.
Blaine'fl Mischief.
Marc Antony, in the play of ''Julius
Caesar," is not a lovable character. To
his great qualities, his courage, boldness
and wit, are allied an insidious dema?
gogue ry whose cunning display is one of
the greatest triumphs of Shakespeare.
Dangling the pierced robe of the dead
Caesar before the eyes of the Roman rab?
ble, he stirs their hearts to mutiny while
deprecating any tumult He brandishes
Caesar's will; and as the inflamed popu?
lace rush off to burn the houses of the
conspirators he rushes down and cries
with fiendish exultation:?
Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot ;
Take thou whai; coarse thou wilt;
If James G. Blaine, after his' Ander
sonville speech, had sat for the picture
of Marcus Antonius, the poet would not
have changed a line. Between the
"curled Antony" and Blaine there is,
however, a striking difference. The one
held up the rob 2 of Caesar, newly'slain;
the other gesticulates as, with nimble fin?
gers, he holds tip the mouldering grave
clothes of the Union dead whose corses
he turns over in their sepulchre to get
the makings of a party flag. Outside of
the minority in the House of Representa?
tives who cheered deliriously at the wily
speech, we may ask, can Blaine awake
any other feeling than disgust as the sa?
cred cerements of the dead Union sol?
diers drop to pieces in his busy fingerst
The dead of tne Union shall never be'for?
gotten, but the ghoul who robs the graves
to' make a party flag shall not be thought
a herb. The flag to sweep the country
must be of fairer bunting than can be
woven from the "bloody shirt" of Morton
or the "grave clothes" of Blaine,
There is one other view of Blaine' pos?
turing as the Republican Marc Antony
which must not be forgotten, for it is, in
Mr. Blaine's eyes, of the greatest moment
?namely. How will it tell for Blaine?
Able, and cunning, with the. Antonien
flavor of ostentatious bluntness, he" lets
his wishes appear as the Undercurrent,'
rather than tne tide, of his speech; Like '
Antony in his most effusive sentences he
would be read between the lines. When
he fled precipitately to the clo?Jc room to
dodge the third term vote he let his halt?
ing excuse of delicacy on account .of be?
ing spoken of as a Presidential candidate
tell tne under story that he only refrained
from striking. Grant's ambition because
he loved Grant. It is the fault of such
men to reason too finely with themselves,'
and expect the world to be cozened with
a half-uttered thought. Mr. Bhrine
knows that his fight with Mr. Hill; in;
which the latter deserves to be beaten as
much as Blaine deserves to be censured,
is a doubtful advantage to himself. Bru?
tus said to Antony at Philippi:
The pasture of your blows are yet unknown;
and this may be repeated to Blaine; for
as Antony was; but clearing the way for
young Octaviii? Caesar to mount the
throne over Antony's corpse, so the blows
of Blaine may tell for Grant, whom
Blaine loved too much to destroy as a
Presidential candidate?a delicacy that
Grant is not likely to reciprocate if the
gate to a third term is but left ajar.?N.
Y. Herald.
A Useful Table.?To aid farmers in
arriving at accuracy in ascertaining the
amount of land in different fields under
cultivation, the following table is given
by an agricultural paper: Five yards wide
by 968 yards long, contains one acre; 10
yards wide 484 by yards long, contains one
acre; 20 yards wide by 245 yards long,
contains one acre; 40 yards wide by 121
yards long, contains one acre; 160 yards,
wide by 301 yards long, contains one acne ;
220 feet wide by 198 feet long contain
one acre; 110 feet wide by 396 feet long,
contains one acre; 60 feet wide by 726
feet long-contains one acre;
? Hon. Alexander H. Stephens is op?
posed to the two-thirds rule in tho Na?
tional Democratic Convention. Ho con?
siders it undemocratic and monstrous,.
The only reason it was ever adopted, ho
says, was simply to preserve the harmo?
ny of Democratic theories, .since it was-,
supposed that, if a bare mtjority nomi?
nated, it might happen that it would not
be a vote of a majority of tho States. ?' Mr.
Stephens thinks it is only a majority rule .
that will make a smooth and harmonious
nomination.