The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, June 20, 1872, Image 1
HOYT & CO., Proprietors.
VOLUME VII.?NO. 50.
i???a?raiii i -
A Powerful Argument and Strong Indictment
of the Radical State GoYernmen t.
"We have before referred, says the Columbia
South Carolinian, to the proceedings instituted
3n the Supreme Court of this State by Super?
intendent Stoibrand against Treasurer Parker,
with the view of compelling the latter to pay
to the former certain sums of money due the
State Penitentiary. We have now before us.
in pamphlet form, a copy of the petition ana
motion for mandamus, together with the argu?
ment of James D. Tradewell, attorney for re
lator. We desire to invite public attention to
this matter. Mr. Tradewelrs legal argument
is able, and exhibits clearly the grounds upon
which he asks the interposition of the Supreme
Court in behalf of the special interests he
represents, as well as the general interests in?
volved, in calling the State Treasurer to ac?
count. In the course of his argument, Mr.
Tradewell is led to arraign the Treasurer, and
to comment strongly upon the condition of the
State, as affected hy the corrupt management
of its finances. Not long since, upon a public
occasion Mr. Tradewell announced his adhe?
rence to the dominant party in this State. His
strictures, therefore, upon the Treasurer, his
candid admissions of the ruinous state of our
public affairs, and his earnest demand for re?
form should have weight with the Radical
5arty of the State, although Mr. Tradewell
oes but confirm what the opposition have long
since charged against a corrupt and corrupting
State regime. No stronger attacks have been
made upon the corrupt features of the present
?regime than those embodied in Mr. Tradewell's
argument. And although the Attorney Gene?
ral, Chamberlain, presented himself as Mr.
Parker's representative, and sought to interpose
his official shield between the Treasurer and
outraged justice, yet must it be borne in mind
that he, too, in his capacity as citizen, is upon
trecord as bearing witness to a corrupt state of
affairs in South Carolina that disgraces civili?
sation and calls for prompt reform.
We have said that we desire to draw public
attention to the argument of Mr. Tradewell,
and to the quasi political points which he
makes with great earnestness, and with his
usual energy of language. Addressing him?
self to the Supreme Court whose authority he
invokes in behalf of the rights and property
of the people, Mr. Tradewell passes in review
the actual condition of oar financial and other
public affairs, and thus proceeds:
"I therefore invoke your aid with all the
earnestness of patriotic alarm for the safety of
'the Commonwealth, with the burning desire to
do something, however humble, towards the
deeply healing of wounded honor of the State,
the punishment of those who have dishonored
Iber, and the re-establishment ot the broken
fortunes of her people. Nor do I believe that
uiy invocation will be barren invocation, for to
raoy mind, hopeful of every good here, and ut?
terly despairing of any gooa elsewhere in the
State Government, it is too clear for doubt that
both, the duty to act and the power to act effi?
ciently, now pertain to this Court in this pro?
ceeding against the State Treasurer. There is
a providence in this appeal in the alarming
juncture of our governmental affairs to this
Supreme Court. With the exception of the
? Judiciary, the State Government or South Car?
olina is a mass of disgraceful ruins. With
violent, head-long plunges, the Executive and
legislative departments are seeking the deep?
est deep of anarchy and public dishonor, mark?
ing their downward progress with a reckless
contempt of private and public morals, the
like of which the civilized world has never
heretofore beheld.
''Whatever Mr. Parker may be in the public
estimation, or in his own conscience, is not the
question which this proceeding brings to the
consideration of the Court. No! No 1
"The subject of inquiry reaches to the height
and depth of a fundamental department of our
State Government?the Treasury Department,
the financial or money department upon the
intelligent and honest management of which
the whole governmental machinery depends.
Stab it, and you pierce the vitals of you r whole
governmental polity, and endanger its entire
administration. There can be no doubt, there?
fore, concerning the magnitude of the investi?
gation which tois proceeding is intended to
lnaugu rater
"If the annual appropriations by the Gene?
ral Assembly have been extravagant, the
amounts collected from the people by the same
authority, and poured into the State Treasury
annually, in order to meet them and uphold
the credit of the State Government have been
absolutely enormous. In addition to the tax
levies, about eleven millions of dollars, accord?
ing to the report of this Treasury officer, have
been added to the public debt of the State in
less than four years, by the issuance of State
bonds.
"Over eight millions of this amount, accord?
ing to this same officer's report, have been
added to that debt since the 31st day of Octo?
ber, 1870, when the public debt was less than
eight millions.
Confining myself, however, to the official
report of the State Treasurer of the 31s t Octo?
ber, 1871. six millions of bonds were issued
between the 31st October, 1870, and 31st Octo?
ber, 1871. But your enormous tax levies and
your enormous loans on bonds and millions
got by the hypothecation of those bonds, have
been inadequate to the support of your State
Government. These frightful sums, forced out
of the toils of a ruined people, all have passed
into the State Treasury and have passed out of
the State Treasury, leaving your Colleges and
Schools, your Asylums for the insane and the
deaf and dumb, your Judiciary and Peniten?
tiary, your Public Officers of every grade, to
perish and decay, because there is no money in
the Treasury to answer to their legal and fixed
demands.
"The whole fabric of government at this
minute is tottering to its fall for the want of
pecuniary sustenance, which, although libe?
rally provided, has never reached it, and when
I lift my feeble voice in this hall of justice and
law in behalf of our State Prison, for the sup?
port and continued construction of which
large appropriations have been made, but
which the State Treasurer refuses to pay, al?
though lawfully demanded, I appeal to the
Supreme Court in behalf of my poor, and
suffering, and dishonored State ?universally,
and implore you to aid this Relator in setting
on foot the most searching inquiry concerning
the causes of this horrible and disgraceful con?
dition of the public Treasury, and this utter
dishonor and decay of the public finances.
That is the grand and patriotic purpose of this
Relator.
"If he can protect against absolute disorgan?
ization and ruin the State Penitentiary, of
which be is the chief officer, he will have won
the high honor of a successful reformer of
startling and fatal abuses in the administration
of the State Government, and for his courage
and patriotic daring in the face of friends, of
party and power have secured the everlasting
gratitude of all good and virtuous men through?
out the land.
"The Relator comes before this Court with
h?8 application for this mandatory writ against
Mr. Parker, State Treasurer, fairly and square?
ly upon the ground of a great public necessity.
The construction of the Penitentiary building
has been suspended; three hundred unfortu?
nate convicts within your Penitentiary walls
are without bread; the necessary guard has
been dismissed and the whole corps of officers
and employees has been disbanded. Disorders,
riots and insurrections are imminent; the
lives aud property of our citizens are in jeop?
ardy and wholly unprotected, exposed to the
lawless outbreaks of a self-released, famishing
and naked horde of criminals, goaded to des?
peration by neglect and suffering, and only
restrained from the last extremity of violence
by the mingled courage, tact and kindness and
private means of the Superintendent, the Re?
lator.
"This state of things, may it please your
Honors, in relation to that essential, and indis?
pensable penal institution is a great crime
against public humanity, the pubbc safety, the
public honor and official respectability and
morals, a great crime against Republican re?
construction, a great crime against the law of
the land, and should be punished; and if there
be a mode of punishment within the reach of
this Court, as before high Heaven I know
there is, I cry aloud to-day for your help for
the people in the enforcement of it. The Re?
ktor, therefore, asks the Court in the form of
this writ and in the prompt and unawed execu?
tion of it in the case shown upon the facts
stated in his petition, and the tremendous facts
recorded for all time in the history of our day
of a State Government bankrupted in less than
four years, which has handled millions of rev?
enue and more millions of loans, without a
single public improvement inaugurated, much
less completed, to stretch out its great arm of
power and bring to a speedy accounting that
officer of the State, Treasurer Parker, from
whose baleful star dishonor and disaster have
been shed upon us. There is not a sane man
in South Carolina to-day, of even tolerable
observation, who is not impressed with the
conviction that this reconstructed State Gov?
ernment will perish within the next two years,
unless great reforms are at once achieved in
the financial department of its administration.
"May it please your Honors, the Govern?
ment at Washington will be compelled to de?
molish it. The great Republican party in its
just pride and its love of free institutions, go?
ing again into power, as it will, will seize the
rotton and miscreant monster and cast it away
in its unutterable shame as unworthy of its
{>ro tec ting care and support. It will not much
onger tolerate a State Government which is
daily dishonoring its illustrious achievements,
and seriously endangering its further triumphs.
This is not politics, but alarming apprehen?
sion, founded on facts whose force this Court
must feel and respect in the adjustment of the
judicial question of granting or refusing the
inquiry which the Relator asks you to start.
Will your Honors stop short of that investiga?
tion ? Will your Honors be content and com?
mand your own people, the Government at
Washington, the great American people and
the people of civilized governments every?
where to be content with this miserable abor?
tion of a return and answer to the most grave
and vital application of the Relator ? Con?
tent?satisfied with this thing, saturated with
a moral death-sweat and reeking with moral
putridity, in so great an affair as the cause and
purpose of this petition? God forbid! God
forbid 1 I fervently ejaculate.
"May it please your Honors, it is true that
you do not sit in the great hall of William
Rufus, in which acclamations at the inaugura?
tion of Kings and Queens for ten centuries
have resounded. Nor are you encompassed
with the g\>rgi30us pageantry which signalized
the trial of the great British despoiler of Eas?
tern Princes and Princesses. It is true that
this modern ravager of a Southern province of
our great Republic may not be reached by my
humble powers, as Verres and Hastings were
consumed by the immortal invective of the
Roman Cicero or the British Sheridan and
Fox and Burke.
"But, nevertheless, this hall, with its modest
drapery, is the temple of justice and the law,
and the seats your Honors fill are their throne
equally with the ancient Westminster, where
the virtuous Lord Somers received his merited
Crown of Innocence, and the corrupt Lord
Bacon his just sentence of eternal shame, I
therefore invoke to-day British justice admin?
istered according to British law, re-ennobled
because Americanized and administered by
American Judges, on this occasion and oppor?
tunity of doing a great good for the State, and
of winning for yourselves a just and great re?
nown. React the office of Ithuriel:
"Search through this Garden, leave unsearched
no nook,"
and with your judicial spear touch the intru?
sive toad which squats at the door of your
Treasury. And if it be he whom the?
"Almighty Power
Hurled headlong, flaming from the ethereal
sky,"
up he will start into his own likeness, "for no
falsehood can endure touch of heavenly tem?
per." Do what the law, truth and justice call
upon you to do, and you have the power and
opportunity to do, and the present generation
of our people will pay the tribute of their
gratitude to your lofty judicial virtue, and pos?
terity will name your names with ever-increas?
ing applause." _ _ _
About Marriage Rings.?Giving rings in
marriage ceremonies is supposed to indicate
the eternity of the union, seeing that a circle
is endless. The Jewish bridegroom puts the
ring on the forefinger of the bride's rignthand,
and this is the rule in the Greek Cburch also.
In the Roman and Anglican, the ring is placed
on the fourth finger of the woman's left hand,
the origin of which has been much disputed.
Sir Thomas Browne appropriates a chapter to
this inquiry, observing: "An opinion there is,
which magnifies the fourth finger of the left
hand presuming therein a cardinal relation,
that particular vessel, a nerve, vein or artery,
is conferred thereunto from the heart and,
therefore, that hath especially honor to bear
our rings." Sir Thomas theu refers to this
Eractice as common not only in Christian, but
eathen nuptial contracts. Pliny states in the
portraits of the gods, the rings were worn on
the finger next to the thumb; that the Romans
wore them on the middle finger, as the ancient
Gauls and Britons, and some upon the fore
fingers, as is deduciblc from Julius Pollux, who
names that ring Corlonas. Since, therefore,
the practice differs in various countries, we can
scarcely refer it to any natural cause which
would alike affect all. Sir Thomas next exam?
ines the anatomical details of nerve, vein and
artery; adding that inspection does not "con?
firm a particular vessel in his finger," and that
"propagations being communicated unto both
hauds, we have no greater reason to wear our
rings on the left than on the right." The La
ram Manual, as old as 1805, says: "The ring
should be so placed, because in this medicine
fiuger is a certain vein which goes directly to
the heart."
Among the Jews, there sometimes was an
exchange of rings, the bride first giving a plain
ring of silver, aud receiving back a ring of
gold. The difference of metal was understood
to symbolize an acknowledgment of inequality
' on the part of the woman.
Ex-Qov. Perry's Reminiscences of Public Men.
Thomas J. Withers.
Judge Withers was a man of distinguished
talent and ability. His intellect was keen and
bright as a Damascus blade, and he wielded it
on all occasions, in public and in private, most
effectually. Every word that fell from his lips
in conversation, on the Be' ii, or in public
speaking, had a telling effect. No one was left
in doubt as to his meaning wLen he discussed
any question. He had moral courage in a high
degree, and cared not whom he pleased or of?
fended. He was very sarcastic and bitter :in
his denunciations of men and measures. No
one ever possessed less of the demagogue than
Judge Withers. No one ever more conscien?
tiously did what he thought was right, regard?
less of consequences. He was in bad health
all his life, and some what misanthropic. He
never courted popularity, and scorned the base
means which others resorted to for this purpose.
The high public offices which he filled were
confered on him for his talents, ability and
honesty, and not on account of any personal
popularity which he possessed. There was a
spice of malice in his composition which de?
lighted in wreaking itself on unworthy men
and measures. He was as open as the day, and
if he disliked any one,, he showed it in a man?
ner not to be mistaken. Frankness was his
characteristic.
Judge Withers was. born in York District.
He told me his parents were "poor, obscure
and honest." In early boyhood, he displayed
great promise, and became the protege of Judge
William Smith, who was, at that time, United
States Senator. He was well educated, and
graduated in the South Carolina College with
high distinction. Immediately after his grad?
uation, he took charge of the Columbia Teles?
cope, and edited that paper with great ability,
for two or three years. In the meantime he
read law, and was admitted to the Bar. He
was a fierce Nullifier, and when Governor Mil?
ler was brought out by the Nullification party,
in opposition to his old patron, Judge Smith,
he resigned the editorialship of the Telescope.
He would not abandon his political principles,
and he could not enter the canvass against his
old friend and patron. He therefore, actuated
by the most honorable motives, stepped aside,
and took no part in the contest. Governor
Miller was, at that time, the only man in South
Carolina, who could have beaten Judge Smith.
He did beat him a few votes, which gave en?
couragement and success to the Nullification
party in South Carolina.
Judge Withers commenced the practice of
law at Camden, and soon acquired a lucrative
practice and a high reputation as a lawyer.
He was soon elected Solicitor of his circuit
over Chancellor Dargan, who was the opposing
candidate. The duties of this office he dis?
charged with great ability and impartiality.
His health became bad, and he resigned the
office, after he had filled it for many years, and
was several times re-elected. He continued,
however, in his profession till he was elected
Circuit Law Judge of the State. He first took
his seat on the Bench at Spartanburg, and de?
livered a most admirable charge to the grand
jury. When court adjourned for dinner, I
complimented him on his self-possession in
taking his scat for the first time on the Bench.
He said to me, "I was utterly confused and
embarrassed, but the beauty of it was, I let no
one see it."
As a Judge, he was always clear, able and
learned. On the circuit he despatched busi?
ness with great promptness, and his opinions
in the Court of Appeals will compare well
with those of any other Judge. He acquired
considerable reputation as a writer whilst edit?
ing a paper, and it increased through life.
There was great force and point in his style as
well as beauty of composition. His speeches
at the Bar were always logical and lucid, some?
times fiercely denunciatory. He was a very
high-toned and honorable man, and no one
was more apt than himself, to denounce and
expose all meanness and dishonorable conduct.
He seemed to take great pleasure in doing so,
where he might sometimes have passed it over
without notice. He was by nature very pas?
sionate, and his health made him irritable and
peevish. This sometimes occurred on the
Bench, and made him appear wanting in prop?
er courtesy.
In the trial of a case at Anderson for retail?
ing without license, the Hon. J. P. Reed was
defending, and Judge Whitner, then Solicitor,
was prosecuting. The Town Council had re?
fused to grant any license to retail spirits to
any one. This measure became very unpopu?
lar, and defendant set it at defiance, hoping
that he could appeal to popular prejudice, ana
be acquitted. The Solicitor, in order to prove
the retailing, put the defendant's counsel on
the stand, who stated that he did, on some oc?
casions, call for a drink, and paid defendant
for it. In the argument of the case, the defen?
dant's counsel declaimed forcibly and at great
length on the injustice of the indictment, un?
der the circumstances, and argued an acquittal
as a rebuke to such petty tyranny, &c. In
charging the Jury his Honor said: "There is
only one question, gentlemen, for your consid
j eration in this case, and that is, whether the
defendant's counsel who proved the retailing is
to be believed on his oath ? If you think him
I worthy of credit, you will lind a verdict of
guilty, otherwise your verdict will be not guilty.
Give the record to the jury, Mr. Sheriff."
The Judge told me of a piece of malice and
passion on his part, which I did not think al?
together well founded. He was going from
Camden to Sumter court in an old sulky. It
was late in the evening and raining very hard,
the weather, too, was quite chilly, and he
thought he would stop for the night at the next
house. He drove up, find the gentleman who
was pacing back and forth in a long piazza,
took no notice of him till he asked if he could
get to stay all night with him. The gentle?
man replied promptly, that he did not keep a
public house, and continued his promenade.
This cold, inhospitable reception nettled the
Judge, and he said to the gentleman : "I did
not mistake your residence, sir, for a hotel, but
I thought your kindness and humanity would
prompt you to give shelter in such weather as
this, to a wet and suffering fellow creature like
myself. If there had been a public house any
where on the road, I should not have called on
you." By this time the gentleman ascertained
who he was, and very politely asked him to
light, and said he would be happy to have the
pleasure of his company for the night. "No,"
said the Judge, "I will drive in the night
through the rain to Sumter Court House, be?
fore I will take shelter with such a man as you
are," and he drove off. "Thin fellow," said the
Judge, "was a wealthy man, and a shining
light in the Presbyterian Church. He after?
wards became a candidate for the Legislature,
and I took great pleasure in telling about his
inhospitable conduct, which damaged his elec?
tion considerably, and he was defeated."
Judge Withers was, for a number of years, a
member of the Board of Trustees of the South
Carolina College. He told me, that a young
brother of his was represented to him as b'?Dg
very talented, and no determined to educate
him. He gave him money, and sent him to
the South Carolina College. The young man
thought he needed a great deal more clothing,
&c, than he had money to purchase. There?
fore, he opened accounts with sundry mer?
chants in Columbia, who all sent their bills in
due time to the Judge for payment. His
brother had given him no notice of his indebt?
edness, and the Judge was shocked at the
amount of these various bills. He immediately
sat down and drew up a bill for the board of
trustees to request the Legislature to pass, mak?
ing it indictable and punishable with a fine
and imprisonment for any merchant to sell
goods to a student of the College, on a credit.
This bill provided further, that if any lawyer
Bhould sue on or attempt to collect any such
accounts, he was also to be imprisoned, and,
perhaps, stricken from the roll. When submit?
ted to the board of trustees, the extraordinary
features of this bill excited some mirth, and
the Judge could get no one to second his mo?
tion for sending it to the Legislature. The
Judge was so much disgusted with the recep?
tion his bill met in the board of trustees, that
he swore he would never attend another meet?
ing of the board, and never did to my remem?
brance.
J^dge Withers married the sister-in-law of
Governor Miller, a Miss Boykin, who owned a
valuable plantation in Kershaw District, and a
large number of slaves. His treatment to his
slaves, and management of the plantation, was
so kind, indulgent and humane, that it dis?
pleased some of his neighbors, who said it was
a bad example in the neighborhood, and de?
moralized the slaves on the other plantations.
This determined the Judge, as he told me him?
self, to sell out and invest the proceeds in bank
stocks and bonds and mortgages. With all his
temper and instability, Judge Withers was a
very kind-hearted gentleman, and most indul
fent and affectionate in all relations of life.
Iis house servants did pretty much as they
pleased, and he did not pretend to watch over
them. On one occasion, he told me, that his
carriage-driver, in whom he placed great con?
fidence, was caught in a theft, and he thought
it was a good opportunity of having a general
confession of all his roguery and rascality.
He asked the fellow if he had not been stealing
his corn and fodder, and selling it. The boy
declared that so far from having done so, he
did, on one or two occasions, when the Judge
was short of fodder, steal a few bundles of one
of the neighbors to feed his horses withl
Judge Withers was a man of great wit and
humor, and most scathing sarcasm. He told
me an amusing incident between him and the
pastor of his church. The Rev. gentleman ap
{ilied to him to receive into his house, a young
ady for twelve months or so, whom he repre?
sented as amiable, accomplished and pious, re?
ally a most lovely and charming person. The
Judge said to me, the idea, of making a stran?
ger a member of his family, was what he could
not think of for a moment. He hesitated
what to say, and at last, the idea suggested it?
self of turning the application into a joke.
He replied very seriously: "Ahl I see what
you are after, you want to make mischief be?
tween me and my wife." The clergyman was
so much shocked at his interrrvtation, that he
simply bowed and passed on to seek quarters
for ois protege elsewhere. j
Judge Withers was a gentleman of ordinary
height, delicately slender, with Grecian face
and features in character with his mind, sharp
and keen. He was a great talker and talked
well.
Grant's Letter of Acceptance*
The following is a copy of the official letter
notifying President Grant of his nomination,1
which was handed to him by the president of i
the Philadelphia Convention:
Washington, June 10. j
To the President:
Sir?In pursuance to our instructions, we
the undersigned president and vice presidents
of the National Republican Convention, held
in Philadelphia on the 5th and 6th inst., have
the honor to inform you of your nomination
for re-election to the office of President of the
United States. As it is impossible to give an
adequate idea of the enthusiasm which pre?
vailed, or the unanimity which hailed you as
the choice of the people, we can only add that
you received the entire vote of every State and
Territory.
Regarding your re-election as necessary to
the peace and continued prosperity of the
country, we ask your acceptance of the nomi?
nation.
Thomas Settle,
President of the Nat. Rep. Convention.
[Signed also by the vice presidents of the
Convention.]
president grant's reply.
Executive Mansion, )
Washington, D. C, June 10,1872. j
Hon. Thomas Settle, President National Repub?
lican Convention; Paul Strabach, Elisha Bax?
ter, C. A. Sargeant, and others, Vice Presi?
dents :
Gentlemen : Your letter of this date advis?
ing me of the action of the convention held in
Philadelphia, Pa., on the 5th and 6th of this
month, and of my unanimous nomination for
the Presidency by it, is received.
I accept the nomination, and through you
return my heartfelt thanks to your constituents
for this mark of their confidence and support.
If elected in November and protected by a
kind Providence in health and strength to
ferform the duties of the high trust conferred,
promise the same zeal and devotion to the
good of the whole people for the future of my
official life as shown in the past Past experi?
ence may guide me in avoiding mistakes inevi?
table with novices in all professions and in all
occupations.
When relieved from the responsibilities of
my present trust, by the election of a successor,
whether it be at the end of this term or next,
I hope to leave to him as Executive a country
at peace within its own borders, at peace with
outside nations, with a credit at nome and
abroad, and without embarrassing questions to
threaten its future prosperity.
With the expression of a desire to see a
speedy healing of all bitterness of feeling be?
tween sections, parties, or races of citizens, and
the time when the title of citizen carries with
it all the protection and privileges to the hum?
blest that it docs to the most exalted.
I subscribe myself, very respectfully, your
obedient servant,
TJ. S. Grant.
Tomatto Beer.?Gather the fruit once a
week, stem, wash and mash it; strain through
a coarse linen bag, and to every gallon of the
juice add a pound of good brown sugar. Let
it stand nine days, and then pour it off from
the pulp, which will settle in the bottom of the
jar. Bottle it closely, and the longer you keep
it the better it will be. When you want to use
it, take a pitcher that will hold a gallon, fill it
nearly full of sweetened water, adda half tum?
bler of the beer and a few drops of the essence
of lemon, and you will have a delightful bever?
age, costing almost nothing.
? If a spoonful of yeast will raise fifty cents
worth of flour, how much will it take to raise
funds enough to buy another barrel with ?
Do Laboriris; Men hare Time to Study?
"All work and no play, makes Jack a dull
boy," is a true; saying, if not a modei of litera?
ry excellence. Its meaning is, tbat mind and
heart, as well as muscle, need exercise. Man
is a complex being. Body, mind and soul need
to be mutually and harmoniously developed, or
the human machinery becomes out of balance,
and speedily shakes itself to pieces. A certain
class of social philosophers have taken it upon
themselves to assert that the laboring classes in
this country, albeit they who perforce cultivate
muscle enough, do not and can not, for want of
time, cultivate soul and mind as they ought.
A distinguished essayist, hailing from Boston,
the American Athens, has taken up the pen to
urge that the laboring classes play too much
and study too little?that the nature of the
case hardly admits of much effort at mental
improvement. So many hours' labor and such
hearty meals to get through it all are required,
that any attempt at intellectual improvement
on the part of the working-class is, in our Bos?
ton philosopher's opinion, necessarily as the
gait of the ox to that of a trotting horse.
We have a word to say on this subject, and
we shall begin by agreeing with our essayist,
that workingmen, especially young working
men, study too little; but we dissent totally
from the statement, that there is anything in
the nature of their labor to prevent them, as a
class, from successful study, if they could be
induced to undertake it systematically.
It is asserted that they eat too heartily?that
they must eat too heartily to be fleet-minded.
We admit, because our experience, as well as
physiological science, proves it, that a hearty
meal can not be followed immediately by vig?
orous mental application. The attempt to do
it must inevitably work ill to body and mind.
But we also know, from theory and practice,
that the last meal of the day should be, espe?
cially to the laboring man, a light one. Tnis
meal precedes the nours of leisure generally
possessed by laboring men?the hours which
are too generally spent in smoking, theatre
going, billiard-playing, drinking in many sad
cases, or, what is scarcely better, a season of
mental and physical inanity by the fireside,
slowly but surely degrading all the faculties.
Now, let it be distinctly understood that we
do not object to harmless amusement per se. If
workingmen will not study, they had better
play than sit and mope. We believe in the
duty of recreation. But we also believe that
study itself is recreation to a man whose mus?
cles have been in active play for ten hours of
the day, and the best kind: of recreation, too,
when the last meal has been, as it should be, a
light one. Then the body rests while the mind
is fresh and vigorous^ and two or three hours of
profitable and most interesting intellectual en?
joyment can be had at far less expense than
the pipe, the billiards or the theatre demands.
Let us now look for a moment at the ques?
tion of time. Suppose a laborer to work ten
hours, and to devote two hours per day to meals
and going to and from work. There remain
twelve hours out of the twenty-four. Allow
nine of this for sleep?an hour more than ne?
cessary for most persons?but say nine hours ;
three of leisure remain. But suppose one of
the three to be spent with the family, there are
still two hours of the time for quiet study.?
Now exclude Sundays from the calculation, and
allow one secular evening for amusement sole?
ly, there remain ten hours per week for study
?an amount of time that would, with ordinary
intelligence, answer to master the rudiments of
the French or German language in a single
year, thus opening a new ana rich field of
amusement and culture. Ten years of such a
course would give a man the mastery of the
French and German tongues, a fair knowledge
of mathematics pure and applied, an outline of
the physical sciences, and skill as a draftsman.
Let any mechanic at the age of twenty con?
sider how much advantage the above acquire?
ments would be to him at the age of thirty,
should he obtain them, and then go to work
and get them.
One Method of Reform.?The Greenville
Mountaineer says: It requires a two-thirds
vote of both branches of our State Legislature
to pass any bill making an appropriation of
ic mouey. Our main hope for a reform
n our State Government, and the relief of our
people from oppressive taxation and reckless
expenditures, is, that a better class of men will
be elected next Fall to the General Assembly,
from those portions of the State uuder Radical
control. This is acknowledged by the leaders
of that party to be a necessity of its existence,
even in South Carolina.
The House of Representatives is composed
of 124 members and the Senate of 32, and
whenever we can get one-third in either House
of true men, no matter of what party, they
will he able, in a great measure, to protect the
rights of the tax-payers.
In the present House of Representatives,
there were twenty members who were elected
as anti-Radicals, from the eight counties of
Greenville, Pickens, Oconee, Spartanburg, An*
derson, Lexington, Marion and Horry. These
twenty members voted almost unanimously
against every corrupt and extravagant measure
which was passed during the last two sessions.
The county of Chesterfield also elected Dem?
ocratic members, who were unfairly unseated
l by a partisan vote in the House; while in some
other counties the anti-Radical ticket was de?
feated by small majorities of less than 100
votes.
From those facts arises the hope we have,
that in one branch, at least, of our next Gen
I eral Assembly may be found one-third of the
I members who will steadily oppose extravagant
' and corrupt legislation. The infamous Blue
I Ridge Bill, which was passed at the last ses?
sion, is a case in point. This bill required a
two-thirds vote to pass it. In the House, every
Democrat present, and four Republicans, voted
against it. In the Senate, the vote was twenty
two to six. A change of two votes in the Sen?
ate would have saved the tax-payers of this
tax-ridden State $1,800,000, or $450,000 a year
for the next four years, which Is to be paid to
a "ring" of speculators and lobyists. The bill
provides for an annual tax of three mills on
the dollar of all the taxable property of the
State during the next four years to meet this
appropriation ; and we commence footing the
bill at our next tax paying.
HOW to Quit Tobacco.?Hearth and Home
says the best thing to hold in the mouth is a
mouth full of cold water, renewed every few
minutes. It will take away the craving for
tobacco quicker than anything else and is
wholly unobjectionable. A pine stick is the
best of anything to chew, but the objection to
that, and to anything that is chewed, is that it
over exercises aod weakens the salivary gland*.
In quitting the use of tobacco, quit at once and
not attempt to leave off gradually.
? The people of Wyoming don't know
whether to call their female judge, a Justicess
of the Peace, or a Justice of the Peacess. This
can be decided after it is seen whether she
makes peace or pieces.
? Dolly Varden neckties for gentlemen have
appeared. Well, a Dolly Varden around one's
neck isn't so baa after all.
"Too Much Preaching"?Too Much Praying,
Editors Clironicle & Sentinel: In your issue
of Sunday appeared an extract from an ex?
change, which, with some limitation, I believe
will be endorsed by a large majority of church?
goers in this country. I allude to the article
entitled "Too Much Preaching." Now, whilst
I do not go so far as to raise an objection to two
sermons on the Sabbath day, I most heartily
agree with the writer of the extract referred to
that in very many cases the sermons are too
long. It is freely admitted that there are oc?
casionally to be met with men of rare intellec?
tual and oratorical powers, who, in their finest
efforts, will hold a congregation enchained by
their eloquence for an hour or more; but even
preachers possessed of such unusual endow?
ments should be very careful not to presume
too often upon their powers of entertaining and
edifying an audience throughout such lengthy
discourses.
It is well known that all public speakers vary
in the vigor and force with which they present
their subjects, at different times; and it is a
fact quite as well established that a congrega?
tion, as a mass, will not uniformly hear with
the same pleasure sermons of equal merit.?
The philosophy of this it is not my intention
now to inquire into. It is sufficient for our
present purpose to state the facts, and let others
I discuss the reasons. In the opinion of the
writer (in which he confidently believes that
nine-tenths of those who are in the habit of
attending our churches will sustain him), no
preacher can safely rely upon the unwearying
attention of the masses of his bearers, from
Sabbath to Sabbath, if he makes a practice of
speaking over thirty-five or forty minutes.
Not only does the reputation "of the preacher
suffer by long sermons, but r~any a man is de?
terred from attending church a1 together by the
fear of being subjected to them. How often
do we hear young men, when asked to go to a
certain church, reply: "I can't; Mr.
Sreaches too long." If the preaching of the
rospel to all men he of such vital importance
as we believe, should not our ministers be ex?
tremely cautious to avoid driving any from the
House of God, where the sacred word is ex?
pounded ? The writer believes that tried and
faithful Christians are frequently surfeited?
not with the Divine word itself, but (not to
speak irreverently) with the number and tedi
ousness of the courses served. If, then, full
grown men in Christ are some times satiated
with religious pabulum, how can the babes of
the church be expected to partake so freely of
it without nausea?
But whilst the writer deprecates long sermons
in general, and think they are hurtful to the
very cause they are intended to promote, he
would not conclude these remarks without de?
voting just a few words to long prayers. What
shall he said upon this subject, of course, does
not apply to those petitions that are offered up
from prayer-books, or other prescribed forms.
With those we have nothing to do now. It is
of the long, extemporaneous prayer we wish to
speak at present
We frequently hear in our churches petitions
in which are incorporated the idea if not the
words, "We are not heard for our much speak?
ing ;" and yet that very prayer, perhaps, will
be drawn out to such length as to weary even
the most devout worshipper in the assembly.
Now I would not compare those who are lea
into this error with the Pharisee, whose "much
speaking" was so severely censured by our
Saviour; for I know that many earnest and
sincere Christians fall into it almost uncon?
sciously ; but I submit whether such verbose
and wearying prayers are calculated to induce
a spirit of devotion; or whether they are not,
on the contrary, apt to produce a feeling of im?
patience in the listener?especially if ne be a
worldling ?
Our Divine Master, when upon earth, gave
his followers a petition which, if not intended
itself to be used on all occasions, was certainly
recommended as a model to be followed as
closely as possible. And what human being
can hope to frame a prayer so all-expressive
and all-embracing as that which fell from the
lips of Christ? And yet the Lord's Prayer is
remarkably brief and simple. What a contrast
in these respects to some of the petitions that
go up to the Throne of Grace from many of the
churches of the present day I Yes, even from
the lips of good and holy men!
A Revolution in Type-setting.?This ii
the age of progress. A correspondent of one of
our exchanges, writing from New York, gives
the following description of a new invention:
Eureka 1 Just as the great Morse, forty
years ago, was developing his system of tele?
graphy in secret and alone; just as Fulton
created his steam engine in the solitude of an
humble apartment, so have I to-day seen a man
in New York who, for thirty years, has given
his life to one grand idea, and at last exhibits
the happy consummation of his labors?to wit,
the setting of type by machinery. Old, wrin?
kled and beut with thought; unable to speak a
word of English ; poor in this world's posses*
sions ; the inhabitant of an attic, and snaring
bis room with the curious creature of his brain,
there he sits at this moment in front of a row
of piano keys, sending a type into its place at
each touch, and reproducing the column of a
newspaper at the rate of six thousand "ems"
au hour, or in other words doing more than the
average work of four compositors. To describe
the machine in detail here, is impossible. Suf*
fice it to say that it occupies not more space
than an ordinary bureau, is operated by a
treadle and is simple in construction. Attached
to it is an apparatus for "justifying," aud ac?
companying the whole is a machine for "dis*
tributing." Each of these processes is per*
formed rapidly and correctly. The beauty of
the invention is its utility and economy?the
estimated cost not more than four .hundred
dollars?a sum that will enable well-to-do com?
positors to own the apparatus, and thus save
wear and leaf of both body and mind. None
have yet been manufactured for sale, but the
largest publisher in New York has given his
order for forty as soon as a company is organ?
ized for their introduction. It may be months
or years before practical use is made of the lit?
tle revolutionary entirety?but here it is, the
successful solution of a problem that has wor?
ried the minds of men for a century.
? The Milwaukie (Wisconsin) News has a
letter from a traveling correspondent, who gives
a glowing account of the Greeley strength in
that State. He says : "I met a zealous Re?
publican who had been at Beaver Dam for a
few days and in response to my inquiry as to
the feeling there, he said there were but three
Grant men in the place. One was the Post?
master, another the Assessor, and the third was
a d-d fool."
? If it takes one hundred years for a hurd
shell clam to hop one mile on one foot, avoir?
dupois measure, how long will it tak* a loco?
motive, going forty miles an hour, U reach its
destination, apothecaries' weight.
, - The best way to\^^^rgTU?
fend off hydrophobia u^,.i?res von.
violence at the dor w