Iitbtpcitkiu Jkm% $0?riml---gd) to the report of the Joint Com? mittee on Reconstruction. Washington May 2.?Mr. Dixon-offer? ed an amendment to the reconstruction proposition of the committee. It declares that when any of tho lately rebellious States shall present itself, not only its at? titude for loyalty, but represented by men capable of submitting to the consti? tutional test, it shall be admitted to the right of representation. v The House defeated the bill for reor? ganizing the army, and will next consid? er the one which has passed the Senate for that purpose. An order has been issued from the War Department, by direction of the Presi? dent, declaring that military commissions and courts martial are not authorized; therefore, they wi'l not assume jurisdic? tion in the trial of persons other than those belonging to the army and na? vy of tho United States, camp followers, contractors and others as are indicated in the articles of war and Acts of Con? gress. Washington, May 1.?It is understood that at a Cabinet meeting to-day, the members present, upon the invitation of the President, expressed their opinions re? specting the recent report of tho Recon? struction Committee. Secretaries Seward, Wells, Stanton and McCulloch arc reported to have been em? phatic in oppositiou to the plan proposed by the Committee, and to be in favor of the President's policj- of restoration. Harlan was rathor reticent. Denison was in favor of the President's policy, but undecided as to the proper time for the admission of the Southern represen? tatives. Tho President declared himself em? phatically against the plan of the Com? mittee, and opposed all conditions prece? dent to the admission of the loyal repre? sentatives, in the shape of constitutional amendments, or the passago of laws on that subject} and remarked, in general terms, that if the organic law is to he changed at all, it should be dono. at a tirao when all the States and all the peo? ple can participate in the alteration. The correspondent of the Baltimore" Sun writes: The new project of reconstruction from the committee of fifteen is the subject of much remark. It was desirable to mat y to know wnatthe President thought rf it. That is well ascertained and known. Tho President and at least some of his friends aro more opposed to it than they were to the first plan of tho committee. The Democrats in and out of Congress are all hostile to it, because it excludes their party from power for the next sev? en years, at least. Some of them say that it will not go through both houses of Congress by the requisite two-thirds vote. But that is to be seen before long. The Republican party hi Congress is a unit upon it, and they command both houses. The next question is whether tho joint resolution proposing the amendment will be ratified by three-fourths of the States. There will be opposition to it from those "Northern States which will lose some representation by it; but, as the Legis? latures aro Republican, it may receive the assent of all of them?making twen? ty-five, exclusive of Colorado. Tennessee may accept it, making twenty-six; but if Colorado be admitted, it will rcquiro the ratification of thirty States. The Republicans oxpress surprise that any opposition should be made to the scheme, except by tho Sutnner radical*, for it takes the negro suffrage question, as they say, out ef politics. The District negro suffrage bill is to bo modified so as to qualify the right, inas? much as the plan of forcing universal suffrage upon States and communities has been abandoned even by many of the extreme radicals. -?-: Perfectly Right.-?An editor in Iowa has been fined S200 for hugging a girl in ch urch.?Exchange: Rather expensive for a -single token of p^ass-work.?Watertown Democrat. vy*o see nothing wrong in that case that it should be distributed through the press. . ?Exchange. Neither do we, considering that prin-. ters are used to handling such forms in chapels.?Buffalo Courier. That kind of press-work in. church would be all right if a friar or a monk were present to lock-up the parties in tho cbase^of matrimony. Then it would not matter if they should have small editions of their work.?Alliance Monitor.. Correct. But break the matter off [ here, and pick out no more sorts or slurs on that poor editor's work. Somebody, if \ they do not keep in measure, may get in a squabble from certain .quarters, and re? ceive a double broadside that will knock their forms into pi? Salem Republican. We are opposed to abbreviating the record of this editoi's over-work in church. If ho failed in making his work register, ho should be noticed at length, and the matter have an extensive circulation.?? Northwest. -;-;-o ? It is wisdom, in a case that is doubt? ful, to take another man's judgment than ono's own.