Yorkville enquirer. [volume] (Yorkville, S.C.) 1855-2006, July 12, 1912, Page 4, Image 4
PUBLIC'S RIGHT
Diversity of Judicial <
Issue and Conct
Damagt
A consideration of the rights of a
passenger on a railroad, to the end
that has rights may be clearly delineated,
demands first an understanding ot
what a passenger really is from the
legal '?oint of view.
* While it is not necessary to depend
either on haphazard guesses or mere
speculation, it Is extremely difficult to
discover a consistent authoritative
definition of the term "passenger."
In one state a court will define the
word with a shade of meaning that is
contradicted by a court of a neighboring
state. In a few essential things,
however, the courts seem to agree.
Up to 1909 no fewer than 53 volumes
of railroad cases had been collected,
compiled, Indexed and digested
by law reporters. These, of course.
represent uui a. smun ihkuum \??
road litigation, for they are only those
cases which have be n carried to a
final decision.
Estimated roughly, these 63 volumes
contain 20,000 cases, covering abstruse
variations on every conceivable issue
that can arise between a railroad and
its patrons. Some knowledge of these
issues is necessary to an understanding
of the prerogatives oi a passenger.
The lay mind will encounter much
that is bewildering, for, unfortunately,
there Is a diversity of contradictory
opinions handed down by the different
courts of the various states. It is deplorable
that on some issues there
seems to be no clearly defined law, and
this renders it possible to so garble the
issue that tiresome protracted litigation
often results.
A suit against a railroad, like any
other suit, rests largely in the hands
of counsel, and often resolves Itself into
nothing more than a battle of legal
wits, with the real issue thrust into
the background.
Waiving the many uncertainties, an
accepted legal definition of a passenger
at present is: "A person whom a
railway, in the performance of its
duty as a common carrier, has con
tr&cted to carry' from one place to another
for a valuable consideration, or
whom the railway, In the course of the
performance of that contract, has received
at Its station or In Its car or
under Its care."
This seems to be simple, lucid and
comprehensive; but It is surprising1 how
many exceptions can be made to so
plain a proposition, or how much It has
been necessary to amplify the obvious.
* For example, the supreme court of
Pennsylvania has laid down the dictum
that "every person in a passenger
car is, prima facie, presumed to be
there lawfully as a passenger, having
paid, or being liable, when called upon,
> to pay his fare; and the onus is upon
the carrier to prove affirmatively that
such person is a trespasser."
The Georgia supreme court has said
that one who has a railroad ticket and
is present to take a train at the ordinary
point of departure as a passenger,
although he has not yet entered
the cars.
The supreme court of New York has
gone still further, holding that neither
the actual payment of a fare nor entry
into the cars upon a railroad is necessary
to create the relation of carrier
and passenger. To be within the waiting
room of the company, awaiting a
train, renders one a passenger as effectually
as if he were within the body
of the car.
As a matter of fact and law, one need
not either be in a train or a waiting
room to be a passenger. The courts in
several states have often held that the
relation of carrier and passenger does
not cease until the journey, expressly
or impliedly contracted has been
concluded. It does not terminate when
the passenger has alighted from the
train, but only after he has left the
company's premises.
This point Is illustrated in the case
of a Kentucky woman who bought a
ticket from Louisville to Shepherdsville.
On reaching her destination she was
obliged to alight in a violent rain and
hail storm. She could not pass to the
waiting room, because a long freight
train stood on the track between her
train and the platform.
She was obliged to stand in the rain
for ten minutes. When she finally
reached the waiting room she was
drenched and her clothing was soiled.
She sued for damages and received
them. The supreme court ruled that
she was still a passenger. Though she
was no longer on the train, she was unable
to leave the premises through the
fault of the railroad company.
An Illinois stockman, taking a car
of sheep from Nil wood to Chicago, left
the caboose at Bloomlngton, a division
point, to obtain lunch. While walking
through the yards in the darkness in
company with some other stockmen he
was struck by . a passenger train, and
one of his legs was amputated. The
supreme court of Illinois ruled that he
was a passenger and entitled to damages
as such.
If a man should leave the car and
clean the headlight of the locomotive
at the request of the fireman and Is
injured while doing so, he does not lose
>?la chorontor r\f naaQpncpr Wa ifl An
titled to damages, as a certain railroad
learned to its sorrow when the matter
was carried to the highest court of
Alabama.
On the other hand a man who has
actually purchased a ticket and is In
the waiting room of a railroad may not
be a passenger. A citizen of Massachusetts
who had bought his ticket, but
had missed his train, lingered in the
station, waiting for a street car on
which to return home.
Shortly afterward a locomotive
crashed through the wall of the waiting
room and he was injured. He sued
for damages, but the courts decided
that he was not a passenger because
he had not left the company's premises
"within a reasonable time," and therefore
could not recover.
A still more aggravating disappointment
befell an Iowa man who purchased
a ticket and boarded a train
to which his ticket did not give him
admission. He was ejected by a railroad
man, and sued for damages.
When he admitted knowledge of the
fact that his ticket did not entitle him
to ride on the train he lost his case.
In litigation of this sort there are
some rather fine distinctions. An Ohio
man who acted as did the Iowa man
triumphed over the company, because
the conductor punched his ticket, al- (
ON RAILROADS
Opinion Often Clouds
>als Outcome of
e Suits.
though the limited did not stop at the
station indicated by his ticket.
The courts of various states have
often ruled that railroads can order
certain trains not to stop at certain
stations, but it was the punching of the
ticket that won the Ohloan's case.
The court regarded it as evidence that
the company had accepted him as a
passenger in violation of its own rule.
While the courts have many times
held that the actual payment of faro
is not necessary to make a person on
a train a passenger, they have also
held that an offer to pay fare to a railroad
emDloyee not authorized to re
celve It Is not an offer to the company,
and hence does not entitle the person
making: the offer to the rights of a
passenger.
To board a train In utter disregard
of a rule requiring *he purchase of a
ticket places one on the same legal
basis with one who refuses to pay.
Railway patrons are bound to comply
with all reasonable rules and orders of
the company or its agents.
Even the possession of a ticket does
not entitle one to transportation if it
Is stamped, "Not good after date .?f
sale," or If the limit has expired. A
person who presents such a ticket, void
on Its face, and refuses to pay fare,
is a trespasser.
The cases which have been mentioned
cover but a few of the many diverse
opinions as to what constitutes a passenger.
Next to be considered are the
rights of a passenger. These are far
too numerous for thorough treatment
in a limited space, but a few examples
will give s>me idea of the attitude of
the legal mind toward the subject.
The supreme court of Mississippi has
decreed that a carrier or railroad is
not required to assist passengers to
board trains or to alight.
But the court also held that if a
carrier stops Its trains where passengers
cannot enter or leave the cars
without difficulty. It is the duty of the
conductor to assist them.
Regarding the time and place to detrain
the courts In different states
have handed down a bewildering variety
of decisions. In many cases It has
been decided that the announcement
of a station is not In itself a notice to
alight
An Alabama man leaving a train fell
from a trestle and was hurt The supreme
court held that as it was night
the passenger was warranted In thinking
the train was at the station, when,
as a matter of fact, it was at a water
tank 75 yards from the platform.
A man of 76 years boarded a train
at Staunton, Va., to secure a seat for
his daughter. He lingered in the car
until the train was in motion.
The brakeman, realizing the old
man's danger, tried to prevent him
from jumping from the car, but the
old man tore himself from the brakeman's
hold, fell under the wheels and
was killed. His estate sued for damages
and the case was carried to the
supreme court.
AUhAiinrk or* ottnmnt U'QQ ma H p tn
show that the old man might have
alighted in safety if the brakeman had
not interfered, the ease was decided in
favor of the railroad, the court holding,
first, that as the deceased on
boarding the train did not notify the
trainmen that he meant to alight before
It started, they were justified in
assuming that he was a passenger;
and, second, that the brakeman did his
duty in trying to prevent him from
alighting. %
A North Carolina man who boarded
a train to find a seat for his daughter
and her three children, broke his leg
In leaping from the car after it had
started. He sued for damages and secured
them.
In this case the man had taken the
precaution to notify the trainmen that
he was boarding the train only to find
a seat for his daughter. He hurried
from the car without delay, but the
train started with such a violent jerk
that he ha3 to jump.
It is a curious relic, for the possibility
of a railroad refusing to check
baggage In these days Is altogether too
remote to be considered.
Some railroad men do not even know
of the existence of this statute. One
general counsel went so far as to declare
positively that there was no such
law in existence. He marveled greatly
when it was shown him.
Idaho has Identically the same law,
except that the railroad must forfeit
$20 instead of $10 to the passenger
whose baggage it refuses to check.
A railroad In that state became involved
with this law. A man with his
wife and daughter, having purchased
tickets, boarded a train at Shelley at
2 o'clock In the morning. As there
was no night agent at Shelley the passengers
could not check their baggage,
which consisted of a trunk and a roll
of bedding. It was customary for the
train baggageman to check baggage
UIIUCI SUtll L'llCUlllOiqilVVO.
In this case the trainmen became angry,
put the trunk on board the train,
but abandoned the bedding. They refused
to give the man a check for thi
trunk.
He told the 'conductor that he had
tickets, but refused to surrender them
until he had received a check for 'he
trunk. The conductor ordered him
from the train.
He swung on to the rear platform as
it passed. A hrakeman loosened his
hold with a kick. He fell to the tracks
and was severely hurt.
He sued for damages and obtained
a verdict awarding him 56,000. The
case was carried to a higher court. It
sustained the baggage law in emphatic
terms and affirmed the verdict.
A valuable right of the passenger is
that which entitles him to have baggage
carried on the train on which he
travels. This right has been upheld
by the highest courts.
A drummer took a sample trunk to
the station in St. Paul an hour before
train time. He checked it to Rochester
and asked the baggageman, whom
he knew, to be sure to put it aboard
the evening train. <
When the drummer boarded the
train he found that his trunk had not
arrived. It did not reach him until the
afternoon of the following day.
He sued for damages and won. The
verdict was affirmed by the Minnesota
supreme court. In a similar instance
the courts of South Carolina upheld a
verdict for punitive damages awarded
to a drummer whose sample trunk was
delayed for six days.
Sleeping car companies are also legally
bound to guard the baggage of
passengers. The courts have so held
in a number of cases.
One case, Involving the theft of
Jewels valued at $1,600 from a sleeping
car in daylight, wa? "arried to the supreme
court of Georgia. It affirmed a
verdict for the full value of the property.
In another case the same court ruled
in favor of the sleeping car company.
In this Instance *he circumstances
were unusual.
As the train was leaving a station, a
thief standing on the tmss-rod under
the car reached through an open
window and seized a handbag.
The owner sued the company for the
value of his baggage, but the court
held that as this particular form of
theft could not have been anticipated,
the company was not responsible for
the loss.
Some uncertainty seems to exist as to
what constitutes baggage. It is established
that Jewelry for personal use is
baggage, while Jewelry for sale is not.
Samples are not baggage, but If the
road checks his samples as baggage
the presumption is established.
The courts have held that the road
knows what the trunks contain, and
hence if they are lost they must be
considered as baggage.
The passenger must not expect the
railroad to care for his baggage indefinitely.
If baggage is not claimed
within a reasonable time it is the duty
of the railroad to store it properly.
Then its liability as carrier ceases.
The courts seem unable to agree on
what constitutes a reasonable time. If
baggage arrives at night the next
morning is generally considered a reasonable
time.
In a number of instances courts
have held that the morning of the
second day after the passenger's arrival
is "a reasonable time" in which
he should claim his baggage.
In a New York case it was decided
that a passenger arriving at his destination
on a Sunday, during which
secular work is forbidden by law, was
not excused from calling for his baggage
until Monday.
Another valuable right of the passenger
is protection against dogs.
A woman in a train in the state of
Washington was bitten by a dog carried
into the car by another woman.
Instead of suing the owner of the dog,
the injured party sued the railroad.
The case was decided in favor of the
bitten passenger. The court declared
that the railroad company had no
right to carry dogs in passenger cars.
The passenger has no protection
from draughts. This contention has
been settled by the highest courts of
Kentucky.
An elderly woman on her way from
Memphis to Bowling Green was obliged
because of a wreck to transfer
from a sleeping car to a day coach
during the early morning. The time
being August, some of the windows
in the coach were open, causing
draughts which were alleged to have
been a contributing cause of her death,
which occurred soon after.
Her estate sued the railroad company
for damages, but the court held
that the railroad company was not liable
to a passenger because of matters
which are ordinary incidents of
travel, such as exposure to draughts
from windows opened by, or at the request
of other passengers.
The highest court of Pennsylvania
has declared that more than reasonable
care and prudence are required
of a carrier for the safety of passengers,
and this position has been sustained
by other courts.
A careless porter crushed the hand
or" a woman passenger Deiween me
wall of a sleeping car and a table.
The passenger sued the railroad for
damages and obtained a verdict for
(2,000.
The verdict was affirmed by the
highest court of Alabama, which declared
that a railroad could not escape
liability on the ground that the
Injury was inflicted in a car owned by
another company, and that the porter
exercised control over the sleeping car
with the assent of the railroad.
On the other hand, the passenger
Is bound to exercise reasonable care
in protecting himself. A Massachusetts
man, unable to find a seat on a
train, remained standing.
Unfortunately, he chose a place In
the open door, from which he was
hurled to the ground by an unusual
lurch of the car. He sued for damages,
but the court decided against
him on the ground that he was guilty
of contributory negligence in standing
In the doorway.?Railroad Men's Magazine.
It Must Be White Republic.?Cuba's
race problem will prove harder to solve
than our own?which is quite difficult
enough?because the Cuban negroes
and "men of color" can back their
claim to complete social and political
equality with the accurate assertion
that they did much to earn it. All
through the island's struggle against
the domination of Spain they formed a
considerable part of the patriot army,
supplying both officers and privates as
efficient as it contained, and during
the latter years of the war its prosecution
depended very largely on their
courage, energy and devotion. They
were good fighters of their kind, and in
those days, naturally enough, the white
Cubans drew the color line hardly anywhere.
With independence attained
the situation changed. Nobody denied
the value of the services which the
blacks had rendered, but of necessity
the fraternizing of the two races became
gradually less close, and as
gradually there have been established
distinctions approaching, though still
at some distance those which prevail in
other countries, with mixed popula
tions. The plain truth is that Cuba had
to decide whether she would be a black
or a white republic, and a black republic
meant in time another Hayti. What
the negroes want, chiefly and first, is
their proportionate share of the public
offices, from highest to lowest. This
has been denied to them, partly for the
fairly good reason mentioned and partly
because the number of officers w 3
far from adequate to meet the eager demand
of the whites. With the negroes
in arms, it was inevitable that the
whites would forget for the moment
their own jealousies and animosities,
and unite in defense of "the government."
Of course, in one way or another,
Cuba will be saved from going
the lamentable course of Hayti, but
even while recognizing how hopeless is
the ambition of the Cuban negroes, one
can understand and sympathize with
their resentment of the smallness of
their share in the fruits of the victory
to the winning of wliich they contributed
so largely. Their grievance is real
enough.?New York Times.
A Difference.?"Don't cry, dear,"
said the kind gentleman to the little
boy who was leaning against the pasture
fence and alternately kicking at
the gate and squalling. "Look at the
little calf. It never cries.'
The weeping youngster gave the
gate another kick.
"That's all right," he said. It doesn't
hurt the calf when its mother licks it."
pisctllanrous grading.
THE 8EA GENTLEMEN OF CHANCE
Trans-Atlantic Linara Afford a Good
Field for Profeaaional Gamblers.
The trans-Atlantic liners afford a
fair field for the professional card men,
and it cannot be said that they fall to
make the most of their opportunities.
A card expert rarely works alone,
for, In order to win, he must manipulate
the cards on his own deal, and If
he wins every time he deals it will
look suspicious to say the least. For
this reason, while sometimes they travel
In pairs, they generalW work In
what they term a "combination" of
three men.
In such a combination there are generally
two "mechanics," or expert manipulators
of the cards, while the third
member is frequently a young man of
good appearance and address, and consequently
valuable because he is a
gyod "mixer" or steerer. He does little
or no cheating, but wins all the
money, as his confedeiates deal the
crruiri hands In him
As the result of such an arrangement
the money Is won by a person to
whom no suspicion can attach. The
ones who do the actual cheating and
who might therefore be suspected. If
any question as to the players should
arise, are almost invariably the losers.
The fact that a player is a loser necessarily
will generally give him a clean
bill of health and prevent any thought'
that he has been cheating.
The general course of procedure is
for the three grafters to reach the ship
by different routes, giving each other
no sign of recognition when they meet
on the boat. Their code of signals for
use at the card table, as well as their
methods at all other times, have been
carefully rehearsed In advance, and It
is not necessary for them to talk to
one another. By posing as strangers to
each other, thereby preventing their
fellow-passengers from establishing
any connection between them, they will
be able to work to better advantage, as
they will not be suspected of collusion.
After reaching the boat the sharpers
circulate among the passengers, engaging
in conversation with such as will
tolerate the Intrusion, and there are
few who will not, for on board ship
passengers whom it would be impossible
to meet ashore are generally quite
democratic and easy to approach. The
man leaning over the rail, the one investigating
the wireless apparatus, the
lone drinker at the bar, the neighbor at
table?all will reply to the commonplace
remark of a fellow-traveler, making
it simple to open the way for a
conversation. This is known as "cultivating
the boat."
The experienced card man is never in
a hurry to get his game started; on the
contrary, he refrains from playing during
the first day or two after sailing,
even refusing invitations to take a hand
in a game, thereby making strong his
assertion that he does not care for
cards, is an inveterate loser, and plays
only on rare occasions.
By pursuing this course, he prepares
for bigger profits later on, as the winners
in the early games are always
anxious to play again and will bring
their accumulated winnings into the
later games. The shark is thereby enabled
to win Just as much money on
the trip without playing with as many
persons or for as many hours if he
Joined In every game. The early winners
simply act as collecting agents for
the really clever card sharper.
In some instances a combination of
sharks will collect all the loose money
on a ship and then unknowingly get In
?Avnarf nnmhtnA
a game w mi a muic . w...*.?
tlon and loose at least a goodly portion
of their winnings before they realise
that their latest "victims" are really
past-masters of the business. Ordinarily,
however, It does not take one
sharper long to discover that there Is
another cheating In the game. Even
If the work is done so expertly as to
make It Impossible to detect, there Is
always one sure way of knowing that
the other man is cheating. His work Is
made manifest by the result. If one
man is cheating in every way he knows
and in spite of this, another man wins,
It is a certainty that the latter is doing
the same thing and doing It better. The
fa-Jt that he wins makes this clear, for
no amount of good luck or skilled play
will overcome the work of the first
sharper. Therefore If the second man
is winning it follows that he is also
cheating.
"Cultivating the boat" is not the
only preliminary arrangement made by
the combination; there is another very
important matter?the steward must
be "seen," provided his co-operation is
desired.
In the smoking room, where the card
games are always played, there is generally
displayed a sign, printed In black
Ink and reading "Beware of Gamblers."
If the card shnrp falls to establish an
entente cordiale with the steward, that
official is more than likely to enter the
rOom and replace the customary sign
with one printed In red ink and bearing
the warning "Beware of Card Sharks,"
at times going so far as to add a second
line reading. "There is One on
This Boat." Such a change of signs is
very apt to result in the game being
broken up; at best, it will last only until
it becomes evident what direction
the chips are taking.
In case *rhere a complaint is made,
if the gambler has a working arrangement
with the steward, that official
tries to smooth matters out or "square
the knock." He asserts that the gentleman
in question (Mr. Card Shark)
"is a reputable business man, who goes
over with us at least once a year; always
plays poker; was never before
known to win. There surely must be
some mistake if he is suspected of doing
anything wrong, as he is above that
sort of thing." If there has been no
working agreement thfe official may
possibly try to force a settlement or
otherwise make trouble.
The sharks having onoe entered a
game they begin work at once, and one
of the combination usually succeeds in
annexing Tne visible supply of money
in the first session. Following this,
the winner is "always willing to give
the losers a chance to get their money
back," while the other two sharks, who
apparently lost, express a desire to
play "in order to get even."
If this subterfuge induces no one
else to re-enter the game they will
start n three-handed one among themselves
and play as if in dead earnest.
This is apt to deceive the other passengers,
as it does not seem reasonable
that there can be any connection between
the three men, when they are
playing for each other's money and
with no one else in the game.
Right here is where the work of "cultivating"
the ship may prove profitable.
If a passenger enters the smoking
room any one of the trio who has
exchanged words with him on deck will
nod to him and make some commonplace
remark. This generally brings
the passenger over to the table to look
on at the game. There Is always a
good chance that he will ask If there
is any objection to his joining the play.
Naturally there never is.
Another and another man is thus
liable to stroll into the room and eventually
Invite himself into the game.
This is all mapped out in advance, the
sharps making every effort to land a
victim without actually asking him to
play.
There is fine logic in this. It is seldom
that a shark is directly accused
of cheating. If a player suspects that
all is not right he generally leaves tin
table without making any accusation.
If he should accuse one of the trio,
who is actually cheating (and losing),
the confederate, who is not cheating
(but winning), immediately turns on
the accuser and proceeds to administer
a verbal walloping, thus diverting attention
from the accusation and putting
the other on the defensive.
"I don't see what Justification you
have in coming into our game and Insulting
a gentleman!" he declares with
every show of indignation, and without
pausing for a reply, continues : "I
am the only winner in this game, while
the gentleman you assail Is a heavy
loser! If there Is anything wrong I
must be the guilty man, and I don't
propose to allow you or any one else to
make statements that directly or Indirectly
reflect on me! Who invited you
to play, anyhow? Nobody! You butted
In without being asked and now
you kick because you have lost a few
paltry dollars! If you can't afford to
lose by all means get out of the game!
Don't force yourself into what was a
nice sociable party and then make remarks
reflecting on a gentleman, who
has been losing constantly without
making any complaint whatever!"
Such a tirade will generally silence
the "knocker," especially as one or
more of the other players may express
a conviction that everything is all
right. The other sharks, quite naturally,
make manifest their approval of
the speech.
There are times, however, when, as
the result of carelessness or accident, a
shark does something that unquestionably
marks him as a cheat, and the report
of anything of that sort spreads
over the ship like wildfire. In fact, the
gamblers refer to such an act by one of
their number by saying that so-and-so
"set the ship afire." This is a great
disaster, from the viewpoint of the
sharp, especially if it happens at the
beginning of the voyage, as it makes
the prospective victims suspicious of
I every one and tney reruse 10 gamoie i
I for big sums.
One of the favorite tricks of the I
sharps Is to "work the spread." If one I
of the trio has four hearts, for instance I
he flashes the information to his con- I
federates. If either one of them has a
heart in his hand, he signals "Go I
ahead," and the man with the fourl
hearts plays his hand Just as if he held I
a pat flush. The fifth card in his hand
he palms and when the other players I
throw their discards on the board he I
makes a move as if pushing them away I
from his side of the table, at the samel
time dropping the palmed card.
He Is then playing with only fourl
cards in his hand, stands pat, bets the I
limit, and when finally called he throws I
down his four hearts in the center of I
the table without opening them up to I
view. As the cards drop In a pile his I
confederate who gave the "Go ahead" I
signal, and retained in his palm a
heart when throwing the balance of his I
cards in the discard, now reaches in I
with the remark, "Let's see what it is," I
and spreads open the four hearts, at I
the same time depositing the fifth I
heart from his own palm. Thus a flush I
is shown, the fifth heart being spread I
in. This trick can also be worked tol
make full houses, straights, and, In I
fact, any poker hand. It is also used
in pinochle in making big melds.
A short time ago a well-known gam-1
bier, whom we will know as Glllen, as I
that is one of his many aliases, had an I
amusing experience on the trip from I
Liverpool to New York. There was, In I
addition to Glllen's combination, a|
combination of three Frenchmen on thel
boat. These Frenchmen were not I
known to the officers of the ship nor to I
Gillen's two companions as being card I
sharks, as they were making their first I
trip. It so happened that two of thel
Frenchmen took seats In a game in
which Glllen and one of his partners I
were playing. In addition to these fourl
there were three other passengers.
They had played but a few hands when I
Glllen signalled his partner that he held I
two pairs, aces and tens, and the part- I
ner signalled that the spread should be I
worked. One of the Frenchmen oppos- I
ed, and the two players bet their hands I
up quite freely. Evidently each man I
was quite sure of winning. When the I
call was finally made Glllen threw
down his two pairs and his partner!
spread in the third ace, making an ace I
full. The Frenchman dropped four I
spades on the table and his partner I
spread in the fifth spade, making &|
flush. The spreads were made simul- I
taneously and of course the four I
gamblers all knew at once what had I
happened.
It was too rich. The wise players all I
burst into laughter. The three others!
also laughed, although they had nol
idea what had actually transpired. Thel
Frenchman who had spread in thel
spade looked at Gillen, who lmmedl-|
ately gave him the signal that every-1
thing was all right, and the four sharp-1
ers accordingly worked thereafter to-1
gether, dividing the profits equally af-|
ter it was all over.
There is a regular general code of
signals in use among all high-class
gamblers, and it was, therefore, possible
for the Americans and the foreigners
to communicate across the table.
Another plan for separating the public
from its money when aboard ship
is to make a pool on the number of
miles the ship will make In twenty-four
hours.
This Is done every day on practically
every line that crosses the ocean,
and in many cases is an absolutely fair
gamble. Sometimes it is not fair, and
in such cases the sharks insist upon
the amount put up by each player being
a considerable sum in order to
make the aggregate worth winning.
There are frequently pools in which
250 or more people put up $10 each,
making a total of at least $2,500, while
pools with 100 members who put up
$100 each, or a total of $10,000, are not
uncommon.
Each member of the pool makes a
guess as to the number of miles that
will be covered during the ensuing
twenty-four hours. The card sharks,
who "stand in' with the navigation officer
and the engineer, guess along with
the others, but their guesses are based
on the indications as they present
themselves to the officers of the ship,
and are therefore likely to be much
closer to the mark than guesses made
at random. I
That this arrangement works out 1
quite satisfactorily to those in the deal ,
is proved by the fact that on a recent |
trip thre? card sharks played in the
pool each day. One of them won twice,
while the other two each won one
pool?the other passengers divided the
others.?New York Telegraph.
ALL KINDS OF GASOLINE.
And the Motorist Should bo Careful
What He Buys.
With gasoline and oil "for sale"
signs peppering the motorways of the
whole universe, garages springing up
like mushrooms alluring brands of
lubricating oil more numerous than
breakfast foods, the motorist is apt
to fall Into a careless custom of feedIng
and lubricating his engine wherever
he chances to stop.
Manufacturers endeavor of course
to put out machines which will stand
a great deal of abuse, says The
Michigan Manufacturer, but it Is very
unwise for an owner to see Just how
many different kinds of oil and gas
oune nis motor win stana wunoui
balking.
Gasoline and lubricating oil come
from a mysterious source and by the
time these commodities reach the
consumer, particularly If he purchases
from the small outlaying dealer,
they have been Juggled quite as much
as any of the "pure foods" that have
caused Dr. Wiley so many sleepless
nights. Even scientists do not know
whether the base of oil and gasoline
is vegetable or mineral.
In the United States there are nearly
a dozen states widely separate
from which these "crudes" are obtained,
namely Pennsylvania, Ohio,
California, Texas, Oklahoma, West
Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia, and
a few isolated districts where a minimum
amount of oil has been taken.
Pennsylvania of course leads as to
quantity, but West Virginia is the only
state which has produced direct' from
the ground a natural lubricating oil.
The oil taken from other parts of
the country must be treated generally
very elaborately in order to bring It
to a state of refinement where it can
be used for fuel or lubrication.
Gasoline is one of the first products
taken from crude oil, and the higher
the density the quicker it vaporizes.
Pennsylvania crude, as it is termed
in the trade, is considered of high
quality and possesses the lightest
gravity. At a density of 90 degrees
refiners get a very light naphtha and
the lower the density goes the heavier
the oil until it finally reaches the
distillates, petroleum jellies, tars and
paraffins. In order to produce a large
quantity at a density of about 76 degrees,
which is excellent for motors,
refiners start their process at approximately
90 degrees density.
It is almost impossible for an owner
to make a private test of the
quality of his gasoline or oil, as expensive
Instruments and testing paraphernalia
are necessary. Probably
the only simple test to determine the
amount of carbon in the gasoline or
oil is to burn it in a pure white plate
and note the amount of soot left on
the surface of the plate.
Comparisons can be made between
kerosene and gasoline, and it will be
found that the kerosene will leave a
great deal of carbon, which is one of
the important elements In creating
light. Gasoline of 76 degrees density
will not leave much carbon. So
far it is not known that even the most
unscrupulous dealers have attempted
to adulterate gasoline. There is nothing
which will mix with it except
kerosene.
Gas is usually tested by professional
analysis by means of a hydrometer,
a glass instrument which must
be handled by experts. It Is used to
take gravities, and the process is not
a safe one to carry on within a building
unless one has had considerable
experience. If the test is made in the
open air a false state of density Is
obtained. What is commonly called
neutral oil Is supposed to be decarbonized
as far as possible.
As has been already remarked, the'
market is filled with oils with attractive
names, some culled from the
Greek and some from the vaudeville.
Names, of course, mean little unless
they are backed by firms which represent
both honesty and skill in manufacture.
Experts can detect the
quality of fuel largely by the odor
coming from the exhaust There is
what they call "the sweet odor,"
which sometimes denotes high quality,
and this is graded down to something
which resembles a breeze from
Bavonne. Poor fuel gives oft a rather
sickening odor, while what Is known
as "sweet fuel" has little or no odor,
although the exhaust is emitting a
dense smoke.?New York Sun.
8hooting Murderers.?Convicted murderers
in Nevada may choose whether
they shall be hanged or shot. The law,
which became effective last January,
will be applied next Sunday in the
case of Andrew Mlrcovlch, a native of
Austria, who replied to the court which
sentenced him: "I prefer to be shot." A
third method, that of administering a
potent poison, was discussed in Nevada's
legislature, but not enacted.
Hanging is a relic of the mediaeval
punishments by public exposure. As
men are no longer put in stocks, no
longer drawn and quartered, and as
their heads and other members are not
now considered omameits in public
places, we suppose that nooner or later
the ceremony of har.glng will be
dispensed with in all civilized coun- 1
tries. Shooting is also spectacular,
and the condemnation to swallow poison,
though honored by the illustrious
example of Socrates, Is revolting to J
modern sensibilities. Under a military
regime shooting would be an appropriate
form of punishment, but we hardly
think that the Nevada substitute
for hanging is fitting under a civil ad- 1
ministration of the criminal law. It 1
mlgnt tend to mane ine convict ieei
like a hero and to pose as one, thus
robbing the execution of the effect of a
bad example. New York's electric
chair, being certain, scientific and prosaic,
is better than the hangman's
noose and trap, and better than the
unsteady aim of riflemen.
Saving the Day.?Clergymen's wives
must have one quality above all others
?tact. The wife of Dr. Locke, a popular
London preacher, had tact and,
what was quite as valuable in one instance,
at least, quickness of wit.
One day Dr. Locke noticed a lady,
whom he much disliked, coming up his
front steps. Hurrying upstairs and
taking refuge in his study, he left his
wife to entertain the caller. Half an
hour later he emerged from his retreat,
listened carefully on the landing, and
hearing nothing below, called down to
his wife, "Has that horrible old bore
gone?"
The objectionable lady was still In
the drawing room, but Mrs. Locke
proved equal to the situation.
"Yes, dear," she called back, "she
went long ago! It is Mrs. A. who is
here now."?Youth's Companion.
"MUNCHAUSEN OF THE WEST."
How Davy Crockott, Amarican Pionaar
Acquired Hia Famous Nickname.
Davy Crockett, one of the most picturesque
characters In the early political
history of this republic, was called
the "Munchausen of the West," for the
reason that he was somewhat famous
for his eccentricities, but with a rare
fund of humor, much common sense
and addicted not infrequently to the
telling of improbable storlea.
Baron Karl Munchausen was a German
soldier in the Russian service
against the Turks. A collection of
stories ascribed to him, written by R.
E. Raspe, was published in England in
1785 as "Baron Munchausen's Narrative
of His Marvelous Travels and
Campaigns in Russia," since which
time his name is proverbially associated
with absurdly exaggerated stories
of adventures." For this same habit of
Crockett's he has received his famous
nickname.
Crockett was the uneducated son of
an Irlah Immigrant, who, after fighting
In the Revolution, had settled In the
Tennessee forests and there opened a
backwoods tavern not far from Knoxville.
During his early years "Davy"
worked as teamster, hatter's apprentice,
trapper and huntsman. When he
was 16 he went home, found his father
deep in debt and toiled for another
year or two to wipe out every dollar of
the indebtedness. Then he went to
school for a few months, but had barely
learned .some of his letters when the
"call of the wild" started him out in
search of new adventures.
By 1812 he had acquired fame as one
of the most daring huntsmen and Indian
fighters in the southwest So
when he arose to address his fellowpioneers
he was listened to with eager
attention. In a few rough, forceful
sentences this backwoodsman, who
could scarcely write his own name, set
clearly before his audience their duty
to their country. His speech, more than
any other man's eloquence, is said to
have carried the victory. He concluded
with his immortal advice to the
wavering element of the frontiersmen:
"Be sure you're right, then go ahead."
The simple maxim spread like wildfire
through the southwest. It was the
sort of talk rough men could understand;
an axiom to live up to. It was
on the lips of hundreds who hastened
to enlist In the War of 1812.
Davy Crockett's whole life was in a
sense wildly romantic, and yet there
was a fine conservative balance in his
makeup which won for him the confidence
of all men. He was probably as
great a hunter as Daniel Boone, but he
had a broader vision than the latter
and was more ambitious.
Two years after the war he lived In
quiet contentment on his frontier
farm. Then he began to mix up in
politics, first by being appointed mag
iatrate and then squire. In the latter |
position, as he was obliged to write!
out his warrants, he took to the study I
of writing, for he could Just barely I
write his name at this time. In a I
short time he was able not only tol
write these warrants, but also to keep!
his own record books. This led later!
to his announcing himself as a candldate
for the legislature. 1
When he plunged Into the campaign I
his methods were so unique that he I
easily defeated his opponent. He had!
barbecues and shooting parties and]
dancing parties, and his witty speeches J
at these events became the talk of the!
state. He would travel on horseback!
with a big "twist" of tobacco In a|
pouch on one side of him and a big!
flask of whisky In a pouch on the oth-1
er side. If he met a man on the road I
he offered him a drink. As all the!
backwoodsmen chewed tobacco the!
man usually had to throw away the!
chew before he took the drink. After!
the drink Crockett offered the man a I
chew from his "twist" of tobacco. "Sol
I always left a man as good as l|
found him" was Crockett's naive way!
of putting it I'
After he was defeated for a fourth!
term in the legislature and took again I
to the wild Is when Crockett develop-11
ed his greatest faculty for story tell-1
ing. During his hunts he averaged a I'
bear a day, and would almost meet!
them In a hand-to-hand encounter. I
These stories as told by him of his en-11
counters were hair-raising and almost 11
blood-curdling. It is stated that dur-11
ing his first fall and winter's hunt!
Crockett killed 105 bears.
Finally growing tired of this wild!1
life, Crockett returned home and was!1
elected to congress when he was 411
years of age. In 1827. This had been 11
his ambition for a number of years. 11
With this election "Davy" became a! 1
national figure. When he reached the 1
national capital in his crude dress he I'
attracted no end of attention. The! 1
most absurd stories were told of his 14
prowess with gun and knife, and there 11
was scarcely anything said of him tool'
wildly improbable to believe. The ad-l1
ventures of the German officer, from 11
whom he obtained his nickname, were!'
not duplicated in those told by and of!'
the Munchausen of the West. "Davyl(
Crockett Almanacs" and lives of "Col-11
onel Davy Crockett" were sold broad-11
cast, and he was credited with sayings I \
of which he never dreamed.
For two terms Crockett served inl
congress, and was re-elected for the 11
third. Then he decided upon a visit Jc
to the north, and when he started on 11
his famous tour he was probably the!1
most-talked-of man In the country, I'
and he was lionized as have been but 11
few men. % 11
This tour was begun on April 25,1'
1834, from Washington, Baltimore be- !
Ing the first step, then Philadelphia. 11
New York, Boston and then Lowell, 1
and upon his return he went as far as I '
Philadelphia and then west to Pitts-|c
burg, where he was warmly received, I *
and went down the Ohio, touching at JT
the various cities, and thence down 11
the Mississippi to his home in the *
woods. ,
He had had a great time In the!
north, but his constituents did not like!1
the Idea of "the plain Davy" mixing!'
with the aristocrats, nor did they like
His UlIICI atvovno vn * * vutv>v?? ?? ?son,
and when he came up for re-elec- *
tlon he was badly defeated.
The Munchausen of the west was *
now 50 years of age. His defeat for a
fourth term In congress completely
stunned him for the time being, and 8
realizing that his political career in '
Tennessee was ended he set to thinking
as to where he should go.
The disturbed condition In Texas 1
inswered this question for him. That v
was the land of opportunity, he felt. y
for the adventurous. When he reached
that country he had been preceded v
by at least 20.000 dare-devils from all
parts of the south and west. His first t,
ocation was at Ft. Alamo, in San An- h
tonlo, where he was warmfy welcomed.
Probably no more desperate and adventurous
a band of men was eve* n
gathered together than the 185 men
who sold their lives so dearly when ?
his fort was reduced by Santa Ana. j _
The Mexicans day after day stormed
the fort, and for eleven days the brave J|
men were able to repel the attacks,
until they were completely exhausted
and without provisions.
Finally the eventful 6th of March
came and the brave little band who
so gallantly defended the fort saw the
sun rise for the last time. The Alamo
was carried by assault Colonel Bowie,
dying of disease, fought to the last.
Five Mexicans were dead at the foot
of his bed. One lay dying across
Bowie's body, slashed by the dying
man. whose terrible knife carried
death at every blow, Travis, another
of the heroes, had been killed the day
before. Of the whole garrison only
six remained when the Mexicans Anal
ly gained admission to the Alamo? %
Crockett and five otheru.
Where Crockett stood when he was
taken there lay about him at least 20
Mexicans, dead or dying. When unable
to use his rifle Davy had used a
bowie-knife. At last bayonetted and ^
weak from many wounds he had been
overcome. The following day he and
his Ave companions were shot to death
by order of Santa Ana. Within one
year of what he thought was his
crowning disaster Davy Crockett had H
become one of America's immortals
Thus was rung down the curtain In the
picturesque career of Davy Crockett,
whose life makes very much more interesting
reading In its realities than
the fictitious stories of the adventures
of the Baron Munchausen, for whom
he was nicknamed?the Munchausen
of the West.?New Orleans TimesDemocrat
BARBARY PIRATE8 *
These Fiends Terrorized the 8ea For
Five Centuries.
Those pests of the sea, the Barbary
pirates, who defied the civlized world A
for 600 years, had at one time 40,000
Christian slaves In bondage In Algeria.
The methods by wbich they were obtained
and how treated are described
by Sir Henry Norman in Scrlbner's
Magazine:
"Ships were seised in all European
waters, even off the coast of Ireland.
and their crews taken into slavery. So jpP
were the creWs of vessels which came
to trade. When any state attempted
punishment the consul of that country flH
was sent to the galleys, and Sir Lam- 9H
bert Playfalr, British consul general
and erudite author of Murray's 'Handbook,'
tells us that in one Instance on
the approach of a French fleet their
representative was blown toward them
from a mortar. Cervantes himself was
a slave there in 1566.
"In the seventeenth century the Algerine
pirates held prises worth 20,000,000
francs. Again and again the
Christian powers of that and the next
^iiiui/ ioiicu iu lUUit'i ? IHSUIIK urfeat
upon this 'scourge of Christendom.'
The British parliament passed ?.
an act to *undertake the Chri a
work of the redemption of the captives
from the cruel thralldom they lay under,'
but its intention exceeded its
power, for not long afterward S60 Engllsh
ships were captured and ?, <) <
English slaves brought into Algiers in
the space of seven years, and when after
Ave years' war between England
and the pirate state a peace was signed
the dey refused to surrender a single
English slave, and the treaty had a
clause to the effect that "the king of ^
Great Britain shall not be .obliged by
virtue of this treaty to redeem any of
his subjects now in slavery,' probably
the most degrading treaty, as Sir Lambert
Play fair remarks, ever signed between
England and a foreign power. 4
"At one time 40,000 Christian slaves 1
were in bondage in Algeria, of all the
nations of Europe, many of them men
of rank, learning and piety and all of
them suffering dally the most cruel
hardships, starvation and torture. One
would have expected the Christian nations
to join forces for one object at ^
least and wipe this puny pirate state
off the earth, yet for 500 years Barbery
held them at bey.
"Just as the c'i sailors' chantry
about "the coa'it of tie wild Barbaree'
took its orlgl-i <n the terrors of that %
coast, so the religious order of the
Fathers of lh" Itcden. ptlon was originally
foun ie\ to colirjct alms for the
ransom of ie Algerian slaves, and (
many A its members, with perhaps
the nobl. at Christian charity on record
voluntarily shared the lot of the captives
for the comfort they could give
and the services they could render in
negotiations of ransom.
"One ghost of all these unhappy
thousands takes literally concrete
shape. An Arab Christian named Geroulmo,
taken as a baby hy Spanish
loldiers and educated by the vicar gen-^ *4
sral, was captured by the pirates during
a raid. As a renegade he was, of
course, the subject of the utmost per-i
secutlon, and when no inducement or
suffering could make him apostalixe
lie was at length offered by the dey 1
the choice of being thrown alive Into ?
\ mold of concrete which formed part
if the foundation of a new bastion or
if embracing Islam. He choose the
martyrdom and was flung Into tht?
mold with his hands tied behind him
md the concrete poured over him.
Thia waa in 1569.
"In 1612 a Spanish Benedictine fa:her
wrote a history Of Algiers in the f
course of which he narrated at length ^ '
he martyrdom of Oeroulmo and de- _.
icribed particularly the situation of the
>aatlon in which his body lay. In 1647
L translation of this passage was pubished
in an Algerian newspaper, and t,
n 1853, when the old fortress was
itroyed, search was made. Exactly as
iad been described the skeleton was
llscovered, and on plaster of parls be- ^
ng poured into the impression in the
:ement the figure of the martyr
emerged, the hands tied behind it.
nuch as he had been three centuries
>efore. The pastor cast Is today in
he Bibllatheque musee."
Worth All It Cost.?Commander R.
I. Greene of the G. A. R. was narratng
war stories In Phoenix. *
"In a Phoenix hotel smoking room
ine night," he said, "a number of vet- ^
srans got into a dispute ou the battle
?f Bull Run. The veterans?all men of
ilgh rank?argued very turbulently.
"But a quiet man spoke up and said: y
"Gentlemen, I happened to be there,
tnd I think I can settle the point at
Bsue.'
"And settle it he did. He settled it
n a masterly manner^ The hotel proprietor,
much impressed, said to him
irhen he got through:
"My dear sir, what may have been
-our rank In the army?*
"I was a private, sir, a full private,'
yas the calm reply.
"A short time afterward the full priate
asked for his bill, as he was about ?
o depart, but the proprietor said to
iim:
" "Not a cent, sir! Not a cent! You
we me nothing.'
" 'Why, how is that?' the other demanded
in bewilderment
" T couldn't dream of charging you. ^
ir,' said the proprietor warmly. "You
.re the first private I have ever met.'"
-Los Angeles Times,