^ ^ ^ ^ ISSUED SEMI-WEEKL"^ , l. m. grist & sons, Publisher.. j %^atnilj ficu:spa(!erj_ <#or_ fhf gromotion of Iht political, Social, Sgricultural, and (Komroetitial gntygte o| the gtoglt- {TERM93iNQ^L0coPTYF*?E'cEANTVaANCE' ESTABLISHED 1855. YORKVILLE, S. C., WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 19QQ. NO, 19. ? ? ? ? ? ? @ (sJ1 @ IcAsi I-II3- Sfc. J* J5t iXt 55lt Jlftfc Jnl Jftt ^nt fr& fr? fri% iftl ************** *n CHAPTER V. SHE Archangel hotel, Mmc. Gipsy's asylum, was the most elegant building on the Qual St. Michel. A person who paid her fortnight's board in advance was treated with consideration at this hotel. Mme. Alexandre, who had been a pretty woman, was now stout, tightly laced, always overdressed and fond of wearing a number of flashy gold chains, falling in cascades over her fat bosom. She had bright eyes and white teeth, but, alas, a red nose. Of all her weaknesses?and heaven knows she had Indulged in every variety?only one remained; she loved a good dinner, with plenty of wine. She loved her husband, and about tbe time m. i'airigent was leaving the hospital she began to be worried that her "little man" had not returned to dinner. She was about to sit down without him when the hotel boy cried out: "Here is monsieur!" "Why, how late you are, my little man!" she cried as she dropped her knife and fork and rushed forward to embrace him. But he received her caresses with an air of abstraction. "I'm tired." he said. "1 have been the whole day playing billiards with Evarlste, M. Fauvel's valet, and allowed him to win us often as he wished. 1 became acquainted with him yesterday, and now I am bis best friend. If I wish to enter M. Fauvel's service as a messenger. I can rely upon M. Evariste's good word." "What, you be an office messenger? You?" "Of course I would. How else am I to get into M. Fauvel's house for the purpose of studying my characters?" "Then the valet gave you no news?" "Nothing that I could make use of, and yet I turned him inside out like a glove. This banker is a remarkable man. Evarlste says he has not a single vice, not even a little defect by ??which his valet could gain 10 sous. He neither smokes.' drinks nor plays? in fact, be Is a saint He is worth millions and lives as respectably and quietly as a grocer. He Is devoted to his wife, adores bis children. Is very hospitable, but seldom goes into society." "Then his-wife is young?" "She must be about fifty." Mme. Alexandre reflected a moment "Did you Inquire about the other members of the family?' "Certainly. The younger son Is an officer in the army. The elder son, Luclen, lives with his parents and Is as proper as a young lady." "And this niece of whom you have spoken?" "Evarlste could tell me nothing about her." Mme. Alexandre shrugged her shoulders. "If you have discovered nothing, it Is because there is nothing to be discovered. Still do you know what I would do If I were in your place?" "What?" "I would consult M. Lecoq." At the mention of this name Fanferlot Jumped up as if he had been shot "That's pretty advice! Do you want me to lose my place? M. Lecoq does not suspect that I have anything to do with the case except to obey his orders." "Who told you to let him know you were investigating it on your own account? You can consult him with an air of Indifference, as if you were not at all interested, and after you have got his opinion you can take advantage of It." The detective weighed his wife's words. "Perhaps you are right." he said. "Yet M. Lecoq is so devilishly shrewd that he might see through it all." "Shrewd!" echoed Mme. Alexandre. "Shrewd! All of you at the police office say that so often that you have made his reputation." "Well, I will think the matter over. But in the meantime what does the little one say?" The "little one" was Mme. Nina Gipsy. In taking up her abode at the Archangel the poor girl thought she was following good advice, and. as Fanferlot had not shown himself, she was still under the Impression that she had obeyed a friend of Prosper. When she received her summons from M. Fatrlgent, she admired the wonderful skill of the police In discovering her biding place, for she had established herself at the hotel under a false or, rather, her true name. Palmyre Chocarellle. Artfully questioned by her inquisitive landlady, she had without any mistrust confided her history to her. Thus Fanferlot was able to pose before the judge as a skillful detective when he pretended to have discovered all this information from a variety of sources. "The little one is still up stairs." answered Mme. Alexandre. "She suspects nothing. But to keep her in her present ignorance becomes daily more difficult. I don't know what the judge told her, but she came home very angry. She wanted to go and make a fuss at M. Fauvel's. Then she wrote a letter, which she told Jean to post for her. But I kept it to show you." "What!" interrupted Fanferlot "You have a letter and did not tell me be ry ^=^<5=^^=^: if fc< By- if Emile it Gaboriau iif ^=?=^^=5ie domineering I will make him know t lis place." o Nevertheless the detective passed an j, ineasy night, and at 6 o'clock the next b norning he was up?it was necessary u 0 rise very early if he wished to catch r if. Lecoq at home?and, having re- ? freshed himself by a cup of coffee, he s llrected his steps toward the dwelling t >f the celebrated detective. e TO BB^ONTINUED. e THE COMING CAMPAIGN. P e L Warm Time Asanred?The Effort 0 to Change the Rules of the Party, ii In accordance with the constitution P f the Democratic party of this state, 8 ays the Columbia Record, a conven- " Ion of the party will be held In this P ity on the second Tuesday in May. tl 'he convention will be called by Chair- ti trmi. t I_ j .1 H let11 wilie juuca in uuv lime. ? Ordinarily the convention possesses * Ittle significance, but this year It may e of portentlous Import. The conven- b Ion may do anything It pleases with 0 egard to the rules and regulations of ? he primary, and, indeed, may abolish 0 t altogether, and return to the con- v entlon system; but there is no chance tl or any desire that anything of that A :lnd will be done. The significance of he convention lies in the fact that an tl ffort will undoubtedly be made to b hange the oath so that Senator Mc- 8 ..aurin may not be a candidate in the enatorial contest. ll The executive committee wanted to s; o something of the same kind when 1 t was expected that a primary would 1< e held last summer. g That the same question will come up 81 n the convention goes without saying, e Ihould the convention change the oath ^ o as to keep Senator McLaurin out, r< he action will not only affect him, but iiany hundreds of other members of 8 he party. tl There are ncfW lots of men who are r' ot McLaurinites, probably, who do not b .'holly endorse the Kansas City platorm, and the conscientious ones will t< ot subscribe to an oath falsely. n Should the convention then take the P ction referred to, it appears now that b t would be the opening of wedge to- a . ards disrupting the party. All con- S ention Democrats hope that no such Ci ?1 r, 111 K.i. thnl auiv.ai atiiuit ?m uc laivcu, uul mat 11 differences will be fought out In the e arty. tl There Is some discussion about limit- 11 ng the number of campaign meetings. J1 'here is to be an army of candidates, ^ o much so that it will be beyond the S< ower of physical endurance of the ^ nost rated political enthusiast to lis- ^ en to them all In one day, however ^ hort their time may be. The convenIon may tackle this question, and It ias been suggested that one or two neetings, or maybe three, be held in ach congressional district, and coninue two days, if necessary, in order h o let all the candidates have their n ay without wearying the people to si eath. Still, the county to county can- t] ass has been so engrafted on the rules ? f the party that it will be hard to nake a change. e This state has always been noted for Ii ne of warm political campaigns ^ nd fights between candidates in pub- .. Ic are no unusual circumstances. If he Tillman-McLaurin slugging match b 3 to be taken as an ofnen of what is to b appen this summer, it would be well j, n nn 11 nut tVio inillt'trv fit OQ - ng for the purpose of preserving order. b ^or, if all the candidates get to a crapping among themselves, it will d ake a military company to quell the lot among them alone, so numerous dll they be. Or, if calling out the^ni- is ilia is too costly, it has been suggested d hat a sufficient number of deputies be ti worn and armed with the new style , f pistols?one that weighs three ' ounds and is 20 inches long. " A company thus armed would be g bout as effective as a military com- t( any. But, seriously, all the indlca- , Ions are that there will be warm imes ahead. DON WITH THE DISPENSARY. Powerful Appeal to Those Who Think. LAII, PfiACTICAL, FEARLESS TfllTE tesponslbllltj For ' Blind Tlgera" Kent* Dpnn Thnu Whn Snnnnrt Them, and Red ponslblllty For tlie Dlnpens*ry Rents Upon Tliose Who Advocate It With Their Votes ?The Plea That Whisky Brings Happiness, Business or Prosperity a Delusion and a 8nare?Materialisation of the Calamity Threatened, Will Retard the Moral Progress of a Generation. Rev. W. G. Neville, pastor of the i'lrst Presbyterian church of Yorkvllle, reached last Sunday morning against he establishment of a dispensary In forkvllle, In accordance with a prevlus announcement. There was a large ongregatlon In attendance; but It lnluded only a few avowed advocates of he dispensary, the greater majority ielng women, children, and well known pponents to the whisky traffic. By fay of preliminary explanation, Mr. Jevllle said that although It was his urpose to speak so plainly that there ould be no misapprehension of his neanlng, he wanted it understood that ie did not bring his pulpit down to peronalities. So far as the recent dlspenary petition was concerned, he had lot read It. He felt very well assured hat It contained the names of church lembers, and that was one reason why ie had refrained from the reading; ut, nevertheless, this fact had no bearng on what he would say. Even if he iad read the list he would not refrain rom saying what he intended to say, nd such caps as he would make would lave to be worn on the heads they fere best calculated to fit. He spoke lso of having been slandered In coniection with the matter; but he would save his detractors to reap their own eward. After reading Proverbs xxlii, 9 to 32, Mr. Neville spoke as follows: We are again confronted with a pracical issue in which the best interests f our community are involved. This ssue Is far-reaching in its influence, ioth as to time and direct results. And inless this question is settled in the ight way, we will have to suffer for it. For whatsoever a man soweth, that hall he also reap." You sow intoxlcaing liquors, and you will reap drunknness and crime and poverty and mlsry. The question Is: Shall we have a dlsensary In Yorkvllle? Shall we delibrately and wilfully open the legal gate f our town and invite whisky to come n, promising it the protection, the suport and the encouragement of the trong arm of the law? Are the qualfled voters of our town going to the oils and deliberately vote to bring hfa cr\ era ntlp onH iinmfHcrntpH Avil In o our midst and give it permission to o its hellish work? That is the issue fhich confronts us. When I vote to bring whisky as a everage into Yorkville, or into any ther place, you may know that I have ither lost my reason, or my religion, r both. I have reached the point 'here I can, and do take a stand on his subject which I will never give up. ind let me say to you, my friends, that here is liberty and infinite satisfaclon in this position. I am unalteraly and persistently opposed to the ale of whisky as a beverage in every arm. I detest the blind tiger; I abomlate the saloon; I abhor the dlspenary. There is no good in any of them, 'hey are all potent for evil, and help;ss for good. Each one of them is a ateway to hell. There is certainly omething radically, intrinsically, and ssentlally wrong with a business that recks men's bodies, dethrones their eason and damns their souls. And do you ask me to cast my vote nd use my influence for a business hat is just as sure to accomplish these esults as the sun shines in the heavens jday? What are the arguments for the esiblishment of a dispensary? They lay be reduced to three: 1. The disensary will bring revenue. 2. It will ring trade. 3. Blind tigers abound nd flourish. There may be other ar uments; but these, I think, practially cover them all. The first two may be handled togethr as they are both based on a moneiry consideration. Has it come to tils, that men will barter away the applness and prosperity of their fel>ws?yea, the very souls of their fel>ws?for a little money? Yes, with ome, it has come to this. In order to icrease their own business (which I eny) and avoid paying a mere pittance 1 the way of taxes, there are men who ave descended so low in the scale of lorals that they would prefer to see ur boys and our men debauched and lade drunkards and some of our omes filled with strife and poverty, ather than to miss the opportunity to ave or make a little money. Such is tie grasp which mammon has on them. The love of money is a root of all vil." The dispensary brings trade! t saves taxes! Yes, and what does tod say? Let the Almighty speak: Woe unto him that buildeth his house y unrighteousness, and his chambers y wrong." "Woe unto him that giveth is neighbor drink, that putteth thy ottle to him and makest him drunken Iso." The man who votes to put a ispensary in Yorkville is using his inuence to establish an institution that i just as sure to bring crime and runkenness into our community as ,vo and two make four. And, if he oes not bring down on his own person le curse of Almighty God, then I have iven a false interpretation to the ;achlngs of the Bible. And all this is one to save or get a little money. But they say that blind tigers abound and flourish, and this being the case, we had Just as well open the dispensary and get the revenue, etc. That is, because one place of evil exists, therefore, we ought to open another. Blind tigers do exist. They exist In Torkville. They exist where the dispensary exists. Go to Charleston, or Columbia, and you will see. The dispensary does not kill the blind tiger. Even, if it did, that would not Justify me in voting for the dispensary. I am not responsible for the blind tiger, and, therefore, am not responsible for the evils which flow from It But when I vote for the dispensary, then It becomes my agent, and I am just as responsible for the evils that flow from It as If I had given the whisky out with my own hands. If a man Is made a drunkard by the dispensary, he Is made a drunkard by my vote. If trouble comes Into a home through the dispensary, then I am responsible for It. You may try to shift the responsibility and clear your own conscience, but it Is simply impossible to escape the moral logic of this position. There is a very serious feature of this question, which I desire to emphasize Just here?it is this: When you vote for the dispensary you place your responsibility in a sphere where you can have no control over it: When I vote for whisky, I not only put my endorsement upon; but I take the bridle off of it, turn it loose in the field and give It license and liberty to accomplish all of its diabolical purposes. You do not destroy the sin that'is connected with the business by legalizing it. You can't eliminate the evil by making the business respectable. Yea, we sometimes Increase the evil by giv ing the business a kind of respectability; for in this way we give the gigantic evil opportunities for accomplishing its hellish designs which It would not otherwise have. Thus, instead of decreasing the evil, we increase it. But the most alarming feature of the business in connection with the issue before us is this; The man who votes for the dispensary deliberately assumes all the fearful responsibility of the dreadful results which necessarily flow from the sale (ft intoxicating liquors as a beverage. He is like the enemies of Christ who persisted in demanding the Savior's crucifixion, and when told what a fearful sin they were committing said: "His blood be on us, and on our children." So the man who votes for the dispensary says by his conduct: I am willing to assume the responsibility of all the results which are sure to follow the establishment of a dispensary. Let me now call your attention to some positive arguments against the establishment of a dispensary In our midst. 1. This business has a bad look. WlfVi oil ttio offnrfa tn matra fVio hiia. iness respectable, still it has a bad look. I know there are men who seem to have no consciences and no moral perception. These men can see no more harm in selling whisky to men and making them drunk than in selling them corn and meat. They can vote for a dispensary and see them get drunk on dispensary whisky and never have any moral misgivings or compunctions of conscience. I trust, however, that this class of men is at least comparatively small. But men, who have a moral sense, even though they do advocate the establishment of a dispensary, must have some trouble with their consciences. These men are on the defensive. How can they be sure about their position from a moral point of view? When a man is forever trying to Justify himself, it is good evidence that he has doubts himself about the righteousness of his position. When I vote against whisky, my conscience places its endorsement upon the act; I have no doubts about the righteousness of my cause. I know that I have done right. There is a moral instinct in my very being which heartily approves my course. But, if I should vote for whisky (and I can't vote for the dispensary without voting for whisky), my conscience would whip me for the act. In fact, I would never hear the last of it, and I ought never to hear the last of it. God I has placed the conscience within our being to reward us when we do right and to punish us when we do wrong. In this connection, let me asy, Why is it that the authorities who have been so zealous in establishing dispensaries over the state have had a special law enacted which prohibits the establishment of a dispensary within a certain distance from Clemson college? It is because they believe it will be against the best Interests of that institution. Blind tigers may abound and flourish, but no dispensary is to be established anywhere in the community. They will protect the boys at Clemson against the evils of the dispensary; but they don't care what becomes of your boy and my boy in Yorkville. I understand the administration has never been in favor of establishing a dispensary in Rock Hill. Why? Because Winthrop college is there. They know the dispensary can be of no benefit to a community, and its very presence in Rock Hill would injure Winthrop college. The dispensary has a bad look even to men whpse moral perceptions are not very keen. It has nothing in Itself to recommend It for our approval. Therefore, it is the part of wisdom and prudence to use our influence against it. 2. The dispensary will increase the sale of whisky?Just as sure to do it as it is established. I know there are men who will on account of the paucity and weakness of their arguments maintain that there will be less whisky sold where a dispensary is located than where one is not; but I don't suppose there is any one who has any sense at all that will believe such a statement. Such a position as this is simply puerile?it is absurd. Oh, how some of the advocates of the dispensary are mortified (?) when they see a few little Jugs come into town. They profess to be great advocates of temperance. But hold on a minute before you form your estimate. You watch these men closely, and, as a rule, you will flndthat they will not lift their little finger to suppress the blind tiger business. . More than this. You get the dispensary here and you will never hear them open their mouths against whisky coming in by the barrel. They strain at a gnat, but they can without difficulty swallow a camel. Direct descendants of the Pharisees! in case a dispensary is esiaDiisnea here, instead of seeing a few jugs coming in on the express, you will see it coming in by the barrel. Instead of seeing Ike pushing the little two wheeled cart up from the depot with a few Jugs, you will see a man sitting on a two-horse wagon hauling it up by the barrel or case. Last year the dispensary at Chester sold $57,681.87 worth of whisky. Year before last the same Institution sold $57,707.39 worth of whisky. According to statistics furnished by the National Temperance society and secured from the commissioner of internal revenue, during the first five years existence of the dispensary in this state the number of gallons of spirits has increased from 37,843 to 84,926, and the number of barrels of fermented liquors from 5,270 to 71,900. Let me give you some more statistics from the same source. "Of criminal cases in 1893, the year preceding the adoption of the dispensary system, there were in the courts 1,686, while in 1898, there were 2,687; admissions to hospitals for the Insane in 1893 were 315, in 1898, 424." "So it appears that after five years' trial of the dispensary system the number of criminal cases in court is nearly twice the number under the last year of license and the number of insane one-third more." Again, let me say that while social drinking may be decreased by the dispensary, yet the total amount sold is Increased for the reason that you can't buy by the drink from the dispensary. You have to buy by the bottle, in larger quantities than by the drink. This has a tendency to increase the sale of it. Then the very fact that the dispensary is an institution of the state gives a kind of respectability to the business. For this reason many will buy from the dispensary who would not buy. from a regular saloon or blind tiger. Another point In this connection: The dispensary seems to be much worse on the home and home-life than the saloon system. Men buy from the dispensary and then they go home to do their drinking, and thus the evils of this curse are carried directly Into the home. I heard just the other day of a sad and distressing case. A young man who lived with his mother near town was the town dispenser. The mother who had been an exemplary member of the church became a degraded sot through the whisky brought Into the home by her own son. I tell you, it becomes us to realize what we are doing when we settle the issue that is before us. If Yorkvllle should permit this evil to enter her borders, she will take a step backward from which she will probably never recover in this generation. As we are interested in the boys and young men of our town and county, as we love our homes and are interested In the homes of our friends and neighbors, we had better be up and doing. There Is certainly enough whisky consumed In our midst already. By placing a dispensary here, we will greatly increase the volume of this stream of Iniquity. We will practically put It In easy access of every person In the community. We will open the door and Invite them to come In. 3. ip a dispensary should be established in Yorkville, it is here to stay. There Is no provision In the law for its removal. It will be saddled on us forever. It can't be established as an experiment. We can't have the privilege of trying It and then abolishing, provided It is not acceptable to a majority of the people. In other words, we can't put in on probation. If the advocates of whisky are successful In this struggle, we will hand down to our children and to our grandchildren an institution that manufactures drunkenness,, misery and poverty. What a legacy to transmit to posterity! You read the law. The framers of this law never contemplated the removal of a dispensary. I have great respect for the right kind of law; but I say deliberately that this feature of the dispensary law ought to be spurned by every liberty loving citizen. For it completely takes away from us that principle of self-government which is so dear to us all. And for this very reason the establishment of a dispensary ought to Be resisted by us all. Let us bear in mind that if a dispensary is established In Yorkville, that it Is here to stay. You may groan under your burden; you may pray to the powers that be to remove it; but your cries will be in vain. Let the case of Tirzah be a warning to us. You remember liow It was there. When the people realized what the dispensary really was, when the whole surrounding country was feeling the 1 nt atnnonHnim PftllfSP mpn UUIUCil VI VlllO uiuFv..uvUU ?v?.. ... getting drunk who had not been drunk before, labor on the farms demoralized ?then the people went to work to get rid of this unmitigated evil. Every voter in the little town, except the dispenser, signed a petition to have this nuisance removed. Prominent people in the surrounding country signed the petition. They went before the proper authorities with these petitions. But those men turned a deaf ear to them. And I don't suppose the dispensary at Tirzah ever would have been removed had it been a good paying institution and had there not been such a strong sentiment for prohibition manifested in (Continued on Fourth Page).