Keowee courier. (Pickens Court House, S.C.) 1849-current, March 01, 1905, Image 2
ON COMPULSORY Kfll.
REPRESENTATIVE VERNER ELABORATES
HIS EDUCATIONAL VIEWS.
"mm m_ FMDIENCY"
Two Head? 'nder Which He Bases Opposi
tion to UL cation by Command.
[CoUit Ma 8tato.j
In a recent it i e of your paper I
am invited thron. . its columns (1)
to state my reasonb for opposing tho
compulsory school i w ; (2) to jus
tify my statement, r? < >ntly mado ou
the floor of the House f Representa
tives, with reference o the condi
tions prevailing in Ms 'aohusetts, in
.entrust with those o this State;
(3) to be more specific ii my declara
tion that a certain odu. ated olass,
??from the exeoutive down,1 is largely
responsible for the non-en orcement
of the law ; and (4) to state whether
I am opposed to eduoation. While,
Mr. Editor, I am naturally a\ )rse to
becoming involved in a now ?aper
controversy, still I wish to than you
for the opportunity to give a i ore
extended ontline of my remarks m
the floor of the Rouse than was put
lished in your paper, because I fee.
that I am giving expression, not
merely to my own sentiments in the
matter at issue, but also to the senti
ments of a considerable majority of
thc zueuubers ot that House, as well
as the people of '.he State. I wish
to preface also the remark that it
seems to me rather unfortunate that
the opponents of compulsory educa
tion should bo classed indiscrimi
nately as "fools and demagogues" by
those who happen to differ from
them. On the contrary, I feel that
that appelation is both unfair and
unjust to men who are as honest and
sincere and patriotic in their devo
tion to their duty and their Stato as
any of their opponents." ' It might
also bo well to add that by no process
of logic can it be inferred that the
opponents of a compulsory school
law aro opposed to educatiou ; be
canso I feel perfectly sure that tho
cause of education can find no better
champions or more sincere advocates
than among their ranks.
But to the subject: (1) My rea
sons for opposing a compulsory
law. I oppose it (a) as a matter of
principle, (b) as a matter of expedi
ency.
As a matter of principle, I believe
this government to be founded on
and resting in tho v iii of the people,
and that it derives ail of its powers
from the consent of tho governed.
Seeing, then, no indication, either ex
pressed or implied, that they desire
such a law, I hold that until wo have
an expression of the will of a majori
ty of the people we havo no authority
for enacting a law Which touches
every home in South Carolina. Al
though I know the constitutionality
of such legislation has been main
tained by thc courts, still I am of the
opinion that legislation of this kind
frequently does vastly more harm
than good, for it invariably breeds
dissatisfaction and opposition. Laws
that touch personal and family rela
tions, before their enactment, ought
to bo the object of tho maturest
thought and deliberation, because the
greatest care ought to be exercised
not to infringe or abridge any of
those sacred rights which tho Anglo
Saxon people have, sinco time im
memorial, regarded as dearer than
lifo itself. South Carolina, be it said
to her honor, has repeatedly refused
to follow the lead of other States in
enacting divorce legislation, but it
seems to me quite as unsafe to force
tho child from the homo as to sanc
tion the. separation of husband and
wife. It is also rather^ remarkable
and pertinent that divorce laws and
compulsory school laws aro found
sido by side in thc samo States. Al
most every State ir. the Union that
has enacted ono has enacted the
other.
Legislation to take tho control of
the child out of the hand? of tho
parents, however, I hold to bo per
nicious in principle, becauso at the
same timo the State would hold thc
parent responsible for its support and
conduct. The right of the parent
over his child is tho most sacred of
all rights, and henoe abovo all other
rights. The Stato is but the crea
ture of the people, and such legisla
tion would tend to make thc rights
of the people secondary, and the
thing created, therefore, greater than
the creator. It has a tendenoy un
doubted!*/ to give strength to the
building at the expense of the
builder, when we all know this to be
a philosophy that is false, both in
theory and in praotice.
I am opposed to such legislation |
again, because it would tend to)
lessen parental responsibility and
cause dissension and strife in the
home, the place where, above all
others, there should be peace and
concord. I am opposed to it
because it substitutes force for
reason, dependence for independ
ence, and would seize upon the
most sacred right, the most precious
gift from the hand of a gracious God.
To reason for a thing is better than
to fight for it, to lead a people than
to drive them. Tolerance, patience,
reason are far preferable to intoler
ance, spite, malice, vindictiveness,
hate, force. I hold to freedom above
all things in our domestic life, and
would cultivate that everlasting, God
given longing in every human soul
to have something of its own to do
ns it pleases with. Any legislation
which interferes with domestic rela
tions and tends to abridge the rights |
of tho parent invariably breeds dis
satisfaction and distrust of the gov
ernmental authority.
Again the training and control of |
tur children bas already, to an
ai "ming extent, slipped from the
ham. of the mother, and the ten
dency t ima more and more to sad
dle the te., -hers with such grave and
unnatural rt *?onsibility, and this, it
seems to me, L S had m nob to do
with cultivating u d inculcating dis
regard and disrespiut on tho part of j
the child for parental rule and gov
ernment.
It is at least certainly apparent to
all that children nowadays are far
more disrespectful and unruly than
formerly, and seem to regard them
selves as possessed of certain privi
leges of speech and conduct which do
not comport with their age and posi
tion. This trouble would be greatly
augmented by any law where tbe
parent would bo forced to send tho
child from home, whether he is able
properly to clotho or feed it or not.
No, I conscientiously fear and believe
that the tendency of such legislation
is very unfortunate, and that in its I
enactment it would cause vastly
moire harm than good. I heartily
subscribe to that wholesome old re
publican doctrine that our govern
ment is of tho people, by tho
people, and for the people and by thc
family and for the fnmily as
the foundation of all good gov
ernment, and not of the news
papers, and not by tho school teach
ers and for the office holders. The
above appears to mc sufficient reason
for the faith that is in us ; and per
mit me to gay in concluding this part
of the subject that I believe any man
or set of men who would take the j
control of the children out of the
hands of their parents would, if the
opportune moment over came, take
the control of tho State out of the
hands of the people.
(2.) Of course if such legislation
be wrong in principle, then nothing
more need be said, but as there are
many of us who are opposed to and
voted against it as a matter of ex
pediency, I need not apologize for
stating that we are satisfied that
the most potent factor that seems to
prevent regularity in school attend
ance is not an indifference and indis
position on the part of the people to
send their children to school, but a
lack of means. Wc have moro
confidence in the people of the
State than to believe that there arc
any great number of thom who are
so mean, and neglectful of their own
interests, as not to send their chil
dren to school when they are able to
do so. There are many other causes
that operate to keep children from
school than tho mere indisposition on
the part of their parents to send them,
l'ovorty, a sparsely settled country,
lack of a sufficient number of school
houses, poorly constructed buildings,
inefficiency of teachers, all of theso
causes are at work. Self-preserva
tion is tho first of nature's laws, and
whore poverty is there is frequently
need for the active assistance and
co-operation of every member of the
homo to keep the wolf from the door.
It is only too wei! known that in
many of our rural sections it is neces
sary for the schools to dose in order |
that the children may assist in plant
ing and harvesting the crops. If all
of tho people were above the reach of
poverty, if the population wero suf
ficiently dense to support a school
bouse within reach of each home, if
ill of the school houses were proper
ly constructed to keep out the win
ter's blast, and if the teachers were
all efficient, then there, would be no
necessity for compulsory eduoation.
Although, Mr. Editor, indifference
may be, and doubtless is, a factor
operating to keep children from
school, still we maintain that it is but
insiguifioant in oomparison with those
I have just enumerated. No. It ap
pears to us that the defeots of our
educational system needs a far more
radical treatmeut than that afforded
by a compulsory sohool law. The
system should be so perfected, so
developed, so manned and thereby be
made so attractive and inviting that
every individual in the State would
be drawn irresistibly by thirst for
knowledge to the Bohools of the
State. Where force is necessary
to or?ate a desire for education then
aducation is, and always will be, a
failure. The two cannot go together.
Moreover, with such conditions
prevailing, the law if enacted would
be but a dead letter. Unpopular in
itself, and meeting with such in
mperable obstados in the way of its
mforoement, the result would be in- :
svitable. This view, indeed, ?B con
Srmed by the report of the United ,
States Commissioner of Education,
who in nearly every report of recent
fears has had to make thc comment
Amt the law is not and iudeed oan
10t be enforced in States as sparsely
populated as this ; but the best ex
imple of its enforcement is to be
found in the more densely populated
States of the North, and even some
if these, notably Massachusetts,
(ind it necessary to make exemptions
in favor of certain thinly populated
counties. Of course it is unnecessary
for me to elaborate the argument
that laws when unenforced, whatever
the cause, arc positively harmful in
their effect, tending as they do to
breed a disrespect for all law and
authority ; it is well known that our
statute books already contain too
many laws that invito defiance. In
fact, I know of no one thing that has
Baused more disrespect for the law
than that of enacting such legisla
tion.
(3.) I am asked to justify or ex
plan my remark about tho devil
ment in Massachusetts." The state
ment I made was brought out by tho
claim that "the schools, the churches,
Ibo small per cent, of crime, and the
wealth of that State were the result
:>f compulsory education," and I spoke
in substance as follows : Massachu
jetts is not the State for us to copy
awe from, a State that burned
witches, that tratlicked in slaves,
jelling them to us, and then being
foremost to take up arms ?b*r their
freedom and placing upon us the
greatest burden the South ever had ;
i State that has never lost an oppor
tunity to enrich itself at our expense.
South Carolina and Massachusetts
lave always occupied antipodal posi
tons on matters of public policy, and
[ am yet to learn that South Carolina
s wrong. Of course I would not be
io ridiculous as to argue that an edu
ction does not increase a man's
?arning capacity and better equip
rim for discharging tho duties of
3itizenship, but at the same time
none of us are blind to the fact that
the laboring classes of the South,
iespite its lack of compulsory school
awB, is to-day and always has been
happier and better satisfied than
those of Massachusetts. Our labor
ing classes aro contented and happy,
those of Massachusetts are restless
ind wretched, involved in strikes and
*iots and labor agitations. Massa
?husetts has always taught tho doc
omo that the citizen is not bound to
lo anything for bis State or render
my service to it unless he is paid for
t, and that tho Stato is an institution,
lot for thc protection of life, liberty
ind property merely, but an organi
zion that can be used to put money
n tho pockets of those who can con
sol it. Teaching this doctrine, ac
iording to "Frenzied Finance," it ,
ias become thc most corrupt State
n the Union and tho prey of cor
porations and greed. The opposition ,
?eld up and emphasized our poverty,
mr ignorance, our orimes and claimed i
hat illiteracy was at tho bottom of
t ai!, and that education was the
mly remedy and compulsory eduoa
ion the sure panacea for all our ills ; \
md I held that there was no more
ense in that claim than in the ?
?laim that the advantages of Massa- j
b lisette over this State were at- i
ributable entirely to eduoation, or I
,hat our disadvantages como from i
TOCCOA, GA.
28-inch Bellows
30-inoh Bellows.
32-iuoh Bellows.
84-inch Bellows
30-inoh Bellows.
40-inch Bellows.
Buggy and Wagon I
Buggy Harness, $5.50 per Bet up to $
Wagon Harneas, $2.50 per set up to f
Collars aud Collar Pads.
Poultry Nettin
3- foot Netting, per 150 foot roll.
4- foot Netting, per 150 foot roll.
5- foot Netting, per 150 foot roll.
Builders' Suppli
Our stock of Builders' supplies is
particular. Sash, Doors and Blin
anybody. Qive us a call.
MATHESON h
lack of a compulsory school law. I
said" furthermore, and say now, that J
all the ills to which the flesh is heir
cannot and should not be ?aid at the
door of illiteracy, and that tho^n who
would so charge them ought to sweep
about their own doors ; that, they j
should first cast the beam out of their
own eyes, and then they would see
more clearly to pull the moto out of
their brother's eye ; that eduoation
alone could not auswer for all things ;
that character was paramount, and
that a certain educated olass, from
Governors and judges down, was;
largely responsible for the non
enforcement of tho law, the distrust
of tho people, and a loss of conlV.ence
in the Government. This brings me|
to my fourth division.
(4.) That the burdon for the re
sponsibility for existing conditions
rests with the educated class is evi
dent to the most casual thinker.
Jury duty is evaded, courts sus
pected, and a prodigal uso made of
the pardoning power. Again it is
notorious that through the evasion of
jury duty by the educated classes,
and the shrewdness of educated law
yers, the ends of law are frequently
controverted and the criminal goes
unwhipped of justice. I do not feel
called upon to cite particular cases
to justify this statement; they will
occur to every reader. Moreover)
the violation of our usury laws by [
the banks and money-lending cor
porations is the subject of too fre
quent comment and complaint to.
need more than a passing refeicnce. j
All of this surely is not to be laid at f
the door of the poor and illiterate,
and because I enumerate sulb viola
tions of tho law by the educated
olass, I am not surely to be classed
as an opponent of education. There
is a distinction between education
and compulsory education. Such
conduct on the part of the educated
olass in this Sta e has done more
barm in the last .wenty years than
the illiterate in a hundred years.
(5.) This brings mo to your fourth
and last request-that I state whether
I am opposed to education or not.
While, Mr. Editor, I deem it un
necessary, if not ridiculous, to com
ply with such a request, I beg leavo
to refer you to a recent 1. sue of your
papor and tho News and Courier
which contained tho following com
ments on a speech made by me in
favor of the university bill : "Mr.
Vernor mado decidedly the mo
thoughtful speech delivered on thc
floor of the house this session." "Mr.
Vernor made ono of the most elo
quent speeches made this session."
E. E. Vernor.
To Extend Cotton Trade.
Washington, February 22.-In ac
cordance with his statement to tho
delegation of cotton planters yester
day, tho President to-day had a talk
with Sonators Foster, of Louisiana,
and Clay, of Georgia, concerning the
oroation of a commission for the in
vestigation of trade conditions in the
Orient with tho viow to developing
the trade in cotton goocls. Tho
President regards it as important
that tho far Eastern trade in cotton
goods should bo enlarged, if possible.
The Sonators thought it very proba
ble that it would not be possible to
provide, by legislation, for the pro
posed commission at this session. At
noxt session, however, they will press
for such legislation as may be neces
sary to promote tho cotton trade.
E LEA
OTHERS FOLLOW.
-THREE STORES-^*
MARTIN, GA. - W
kCKSMITH
.$4 80
. 4 60
.4 75
. 6 00
. 6 75
.7 60
larness.
io.
.6.
.$2 25
. . 2 75
. 8 25
es.
complete in every
de oheaper than
SUPPL
100-pound Cast A
100-pound Wroug
24-inoh Daoksmit
Hi il id Steel LI am m
Hui id Hf el Cleave
Everything in BU
Heymon Cirole
Georgia Bateho
Extra No. 1 Plo
Bar
Barb Wire, $2.00
Wire NnilB,|$2.50,
It will pay you to
Buggy
Hickory Buggy R
I. Oak One-Hor8e W
P Oak Two-Horse V
?ARDWARE CO., "
?a#ip^WiJ<$i1W^d?y^^^T^?
Shooting in Columbia. |
Columbia, February 21. Jehu
Hunt, of Hunt Bros., restaurant keep
ers on Gervais street, was shot and
probably killed this afternoon by
Chas. Walker, said to be an employee
in the Columbia Duck Mill. Some
time ago Walker, with Ott Collum
and Jim Collum, half brothers, entered
the restaurant and created a disturb
ance. They were put out. The
three went to the restaurant again
this afternoon in an intoxicated con
dition, and they were again ejected.
The three, returning later, Jim Cul
lum called Hunt out. While they
were holding a colloquy the other
two came np and Walker, without a
word, drew a pistol and, placing it on
Hunt's stomach, fired. Hunt grabbed
his assailant and held bim until
others arrived. Hunt then collapsed.
The other two men were also arrest
ed. Hunt was taken to the hospital
and physicians expressed little hope
of his recovery.
With ten Circuit Judges and with
eaoh Supremo Court Justioc provided
with a fund for a stenographer, we
may hope that tho legal business of
the State will bo much more expedi
tiously disposed of than heretofore.
Tho State has incurred heavy ex
pense to comply with the demands
of the bar and bench. It is now for
the legal profession to discharge its
obligation to the commonwealth.
Columbia State.
imDovBrlsfted Soil
Impoverished soil, like impov
erished blood, needs a proper
fertilizer. A chemist by analyz
ing the soil can tell you what
fertilizer to use for different
products.
If your blood is impoverished
your doctor will tell you what
you need to fertilize it and give
it the rich, red corpuscles that
tire lacking in it. It may be you
need ti tonic, but more likely you
need a concentrated fat food,
and fat is the element lacking
in your system.
There is no fat food that is
so easily digested and assimi
lated as
Scott's Emulsion
of Cod Liver Oil
It will nourish and strengthen
the body when milk and cream
tail to do it. Scott's Emulsion
ia always the same; always
palatable and always beneficial
where the body is wasting from
any cause, either in children
or adults.
We will send you a am m pis fi-ve.
Bo sure that this nic
turo in tho form of a
label is on tho wrapper
of every bottle of Emul
sion you buy.
SCOTT & BOWNE
CHEMISTS
?09 Kan St., Hm Tort
60c. and $1.00.
All Druggists.
ESTMINSTER, S. C.
IES.
nvil.M 00
ht Anvil, $8.60 to. 10 00
h TOUR?. ?? -
iere, 25o. and up. %
ra and Hardios, 30o. and up.
koksmitb Suppliea.
Plow Stocks.
Foot Plow Stocks, OOo.
t Plow Stooks, 80o.
w Handles, 25o, per pair.
b Wire and Nails.
per 100 poundB.
Keg base,
buy from xis.
and Wagon Repairs.
?mn, 86c. per sot.
ragon Kims, $l per set.
(Tagon Rims, $1.26 per set. ,_
/ESTMINSTER, S. C.
4
What a Barrel of Whiskey Contains.
A barrel of headaobes, heartaches, of
woes,
A barrel of ourses, a barrel of blows;
A barrel of sorrow from a loving, weary
wife,
A barrel of care, a bro rel of strife;
A barrel of unavailing regret,
A barrel of cares, a barrel of debt;
A barrel of hunger, of poison, of pain,
A barrel of bopos all blastod and vain ;
A barrel of poverty, ruin and blight,
A barrel of tears that run in the night;
A barrel of crime, a barrel of groans,
A barrel of orphan's roost pitiful moans;
A barrel of serpent* that hiss as they
pass,
That grow from tho liquor in the hoad of
the glass.
A barrol of falsehoods, a barrel of ories,
That falls from tho mauiao's lips as he
dios.
WTPll
After oatlng, persons of n bilious habit:
will derive great benefit by taking one
of these pills. If you have been
DRINKING TOO MUCH,
they will promptly relieve thc nausea.
SICK HEADACHE_-.
and nervousness which follows, restore
the appetite and remove gloomy feel
ings. Elegantly sugar coated.
Take No Substitute.
What is Sympathy?
Sympathy is food to a starving
heart.
Sympathy is two hearts pulling at
one load.
I Sympathy is the staff on which
trouble leans.
Sympathy is thc cream that rises
on the milk of human kindness.
Sympathy in sorrow's hour is like
the gentle rain to drooping flowers.
Sympathy is the least the rich may
give, the most the poor can offer.
Sympathy is the blossom grown
from the costly bulb called personal
suffering.
1 Sympathy is a well toned instru
ment that readily responds to notes
of weal or woe.
Sympathy is the most powerful
humnn|? magnet for attracting and
holding friendship.
Sympathy is perfect forgetfulness
of oneself in true feeling for the un
happiness of others.
Sympathy is love's healing balm
sproad by pity's tende, hand on sor
row's heart wound.
Who Should Not Marry.
The woman who expects to have
"a good, easy time."
The woman who wants to refur
nish her house every spring.
Tho woman who buys for tho mere
pleasure of buying.
Tho woman who thinks that cook
and nurse can keep house.
Tho woman who would rather die
than wear last season's hat.
The woman who expects a declara
tion of lovo three times a day.
Tho woman who marries in order
to havo some one to pay her bills.
Thc woman who thinks she can
get *f>,000 worth of style out of
$1,000 income.
The woman who proudly declares
that she cannot hera a pocket hand
kerchief and novor made up a bed in
her lifo.
Grayce-They tell me she's not a
bit pretty. What docs she look like,
anyhow ?
Gladys-Well, my dear, shu re
sembles you as much as anybody I
know.-Louisville Courier-Journal.