t~t aot .avILd1n'tt~,Ct "WVe will cling; to the Pillars of the Temple of our U rS , amid if it must fall, we wil' rs mds h un. W. F. DURISOE & SON, Proprietors. I JEtIELU, 0.1., JOL. 18NO I80 NEOS EPISCOPOS, Editor. " He that is first in his own cause seemeth just, but his neighbor cometh and searcheth him." SOLOMON. Cor. SzKIs,-My dear Sir: Although this article is in the form of a communica tion, I prefer, for several reasons, to occupy the corner to which I have been accustomed for some months past. You were not more surprised, I appro hiend, at seeing my endorsement in the issue of the 4th inst., of Rev. Mr. TUCKER'S letter than was your editorial associate in reading your article of the 11th inst., headed " Per sonal ;"-which party had the best cause for .surprise will perhaps be seen in the sequel. Allow me then first to correct an impres sion which your piece may have made on the minds of some who "Know Nothing" (in the natural way) of the manner in which I became connected with the paper. It is very true as you state that " a .friend of ours voluntarily offered his services to conduct a ' Religious Department' in the paper ;" but unless my memory plays the traitor, that friend did not know you in the transaction. We did indeed have some conversation on -the subject, but not until after the arrange ment was effected between myself and the Junior Proprietor. It is much to be regret ted that this thought did not occur to you, as it might in some degree have tempered the tone of superciliousness which charac terised a part of your article. But that which has occasioned the most surprise to myself, and to every one else with whom I have passed a word on the subject, without distinction of party, religi ons or political, saint or sinner, was, that the letter to which. I -gave a " downright and hearty approval,". should have presented it self to you as such a monstrum horrendum informe, in all tihe hideousness of Anti-Catho. lie Know Nothingism. ' I have however worked out a solution of the Matter which to myself at least is satisfactory, and to which in the spirit of charity I shall ad e, until a"_raft___ tit' that.is,. that when you penned the article you had not read Mr. T's letter, but simply glancing at it, and seeing that it called in question the ccuracy of some statement made by Mr. STEPHEN'S, you concluded it to be "Know Nothing" and hence your " personal" re flection. I shall not stop here to offer any com ments on the document which has given .offence to you and perhaps to others. That :has been widely published, and become part .of the history of the times; it can be seen and read of all men where a free press sends the light of knowledge throughout our happy country, and the flag of freedom waves "O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave." Thanks be to God, that flag still displays its :ample folds high above the sectarian stand ards that would displace it, and under the shade of the Palmetto all can meet and build the altars of their religious faith.' Esto per petua, be the prayer of every Christian, the sentiment of every patriot. All that I submit in reference to the letter and my own "approval," is, that the matter discussed in it was of a religious and not a political character. 'The question at issue was in relation to a point of priority and historical fact, respecting the establishment of religious liberty in America, and in proof of this I offer not my word, but refer you to the document contained in the Advertiser of the 4th July. -But Sir, the next thing which is presented for your consideration, as an act of injus tice to one who had a right to expect better things, is not a mere matter of inference