The Abbeville press and banner. (Abbeville, S.C.) 1869-1924, July 05, 1918, Image 4
I the people of South
| forever from the
slean and decent DemoBbility.
He could have
leader and could have
)0<L But he chose to
s ability to gain an
se and gratify an insatr
for power. Once he
jTow there are none so
him reverence.
Iirest the people of South
know.what Blaese did to
j|fall of 1916 Beard had
gat an independent tickjfeneral
election, prompted
V'to this course by
site/ appeared no chance
iss of thi3 ticket, howGfe&y
-V ' .
tease drew away from it.
jhis matter I have a letfrd,
under date of March
jr>which he says that
and even named the
" ticket of 1912, and
FBlfiase^encouraged me
lat ticket at the followgeneral
election?which
yised me against Then
feet and left me in the
he has deserted me."
r" South Carolina has
> :
i as Beard has. Beard
goard in 1910, pron
the stump, and was
beck and call.
t'A' a- j i? t.:?
Iljns xo sluuu uy uia
rdia in the penitentia
resuitu of following
*fcd /and yet, as I can
ird's letters. Blease had
]p him in any way, and
n$h as given a dollar to
fty?fo;r Beard is no
-/
k when I learned that
loncerted effort all over
la to get me into the
oinor as a Blease can
ISsttned. I knew that I
tftider any circumstances
H&e to be used in cons'
this man who was a
as party and an outny
of the government in
IbHe^C x'
ic will rceall my correaith
certain Blease memV'
.
Anderson county delegaih
I refused to ally my?had
a great work ahead
qrk that was bigger than
lIMao .And pofnaorl to
BBlwith either the Blease
faction, choosing ra|Hter
the campaign as a
a supporter of prinEbly
put into
Aull at the
i secret use
lought that
helping him,
was to get
work, as he
that when I
I Bid expose CoopHiery
and destroy
Ry hoped by. tiiia.
by me, and to^Cse
Die5?troyHig~ ooper
H Richards, their
Railed. The treach
I to unmask CoopBne
the opportunism
at an earlier
Ihn Aull hopes for
Seel sorry for him,
by when away from
nee of Blease.
KTDRS M^T.ATTRIN
IBs. c.
He under a doctor's
be back on the camay
if possible.
V-;
? Entered
'm ,;V
lease and Aull
ECRETARY KNOWS
OF McLAURIN'S> ALH|"TRAP"
LETTERS.
HUnts were issued yesterday
Aull and Cole L.
Ri: answer to the McLaurin
ro the people of South CaroAkished
in The State yesterjBpg.
The statement by Mr.
Editor of The- State:
ffhnfeel it necessary for m?
^Tany comment on the letter
McLauriij, which you
|^?this moraihg. I am satisSKr.
McLaurin'a past con-'
IBvtttb Carolina politics,
"? ? " m
|tion. ... A few disgruntled per- ^
sons may vote against Mr. Manning ^
and against President Wilson but
there is no likelihood that Mr Blease ^
will lead a party mutiny." gg
And the Greenville Piedmont, the n(
editor of which is a very close friend j
of Mr. McLaurin, said editorially in ^
his issue of November 8, 1916: fr
"Just as The Piedmont predicted,
the regular Democratic ticket in ja
South Carolina was elected yester- n(
day with practically no opposition, p(
though some hot-headed friends of ai
ex-Governor Blease did not listen to a?
him and distributed tickets on which w
his name appeared as a candidate ^
for governor instead of that of the ej
regular nominee, Richard L Man- m
ning. There was lots of talk of a w
bolt, but it ended in talk. The Piedmont
felt sure that it would so end, ao
S?l
because "no bolt in this State has w
ever come from the class of peo- jn
pie who furnish the bulk of the gy
strength of the Bleaseite faction, and pj
because the suggestion of a bolt re- ?
fli
~celve3 no encouragement frouTefcf^
ther Blease or any of his lieutenants."
that he is too honorable a gentleman ?j
to betray any trust reposed in him. ge
He served the old Eighth circuit as aj
court stenographer for eight years,
and has been made court stenographer
of this circuit, a position of gF
honor and trust, and I know that he
would be willing to leave his reputation
for square dealing in the jy
hands of the members of the bar
__1 1__ 1 nnJ
among" wiiuni n? uw wumcu, quu
with the supreme court and circuit f
judges who have presided over the gf.
many courts which he has reported.
The statement that I encouraged n(
Beard in putting out a ticket is as m
black a lie as has ever been put in
print. On the contrary, I warned ta
Beard against any such step, and
told him not to do it, and when he
came to me complaining that he had
spent money to have tickets printed
and wanted me to help reimburse A
him. I absolutely refused to have T<
anything to do with it; and there
isn't a man in the State of any hon- Sc
or who will say that I ever men- Jc
tioned the matter of an independent lis
ticket to him, except to discourage se
it. wi
As to my "desertion" of Beard, I ev
think it only necessary for me to ev
say that I warned Beard frequently m:
about articles that he was writing, of
and told him that if he was not ag
careful he was going to get into fa
serious trouble. It ?9 unnecessary pi;
foAme to gay what__*hia reply was, gi1
ing himself to run for governor, and
in reply to one of these, signed bycertain
members of the Anderson
delegation, he takes occasion to ex
coriate these gentlemen who had
paid" him the highest compliment
they could; cusses out Tillman and
Blease and sets out to create a McLaurin
faction in South Carolina. He
(Continued on Page 5, Col. 2.)
i
I
V? a
s secretary; but on the contrarj
Iter his election, he came into m
fice with Mr. Aull and said h
dn't see how he could run the bus
?ss unless I would let hiriS hav
ull to help him. I remember th
>nversation distinctly. And I sai
* Mr. Aull, "John, I don't like t
ve you up; my business is in sue
lap'e now, winding up the affairs o
ie office; but I don't want to de
*ive you of a good position, bf
luse I will have nothing to offe
>u after I leave the governor's oi
:e, and while I do so with much re
* -C 4-ry o,
nation which too often leads him to
believe that those who are trying to t
serve him have some double purpose.
My recollection of the senator's position
in the race is that he wrote
Mr. Blease urging that the Blease
candidacy would elect Cooper, and
that Blease should get out of the
race in favor of Manning; that he
then played to the Manning regime
until Manning threw him down in
the State convention and Fred. Dominick
and I, in that convention, came
to the rescue of the State warehouse
system. Then he came out actively
and openly for Blease, and made
speeches in his behalf. When Blease
was defeated, he then drops Blease,
He then has petitions circulated ask
he destroyed, in order that Blease
might be led into a trap through me.
That is about all there is to the
whole matter. Mr. Capers' statement
to "my dear Mac," as to any
overtures made by me is absolutely
false. Mr. McLaurin's statement
that I was "keeping Blease inform- *
ed" as to anything going on in Mr.
McLaurin's office is also absolutely
untrue. As I say, in view of later
developments, I have no doubt that
| Senator McLaurin was endeavoring
to use me as a tool; but he succeeded
only in so far as securing from
me the best work of which I was
capable for him and the State warehouse
system.
As to any change in my attitude
on account of McLaurin's frequent
changes of position in the gubernatorial
race of 1916, that is simply
an evidence of the senaotr's imagi
not mention the name of McLaurin
nor of Capers, nor did I say anything
about any correspondence between
McLaurin and Capers, of
which I learned only this morning.
As the matter in controversy was
the incident here in Columbia, with
regard to which the newspaper conference
had taken place in the office '
of Governor Manning's secretary,v
participated in by the News and - _ '
Courier and State representatives.:
and myself, and at which Governor '
Manning stated what he felt would '
be the injury resulting to South
Carolina if the fisticuff should be
published at that time?in which I
agreed?I furnished a copy of the
letter to the city editor of The State
the Columbia representative of the
News and Courier, and to Governor
Manning. It was from one of these
sources that Mr. Cooper must have
secured the copy of the letter and
"not from me.
Had Mr. McLaurin requested a '
copy of the letter, I would have
gladly furnished it to him, and he .
would have saved Mr. Capers a
search of his files and saved himself
all that far-fetched rigmarole about
letters to Mr. Ciapers, dictated to me*
and the originals of whcih he says
better for him to come to Columbia
and make certain satemente face to
face rather than' to be publishing'
them from long range, and also
warned him that "none of the newspaper
men involved is subsidized by
a candidate for governor, as you
are, and none of them is supporting:
a man, who, in the face of his pre-v
vious record, went to Washington,!
after the campaign of 1916, and offered
to carry the State 'Republi- -
can' if $1,000 for each county was
put up by the Republican commit
tee." '*
. That's all I said, and it was in a
letter to Cheshire, in which I did
1 : on
authority which I did not question,
my name was constantly being
rung in, and I knew that the charge
to be made, and which had been
made, that I had played any double
part, or had anything to do with any
Washington conference, or any bolt
from the party, was absolutely and
unequivocally false, and I was getting
tired of being drawn into the
political mess which Senator McLaurin
was stirring .in the pot which
he always has handy, it seems, downin
Marlboro. In order to put both
Senator McLaurip and The Tirbune
on notice, I wrote the editor of The
Tribune, about the time I calculated
Senator McLaurin was to start for
Charlotte to give out his great political
annunciation, and told Cheshire
that I thought it would be
\J b ailCCU iliVj KJ VVH M fcJ W -
!ut along with all these other things
was constantly receiving informaion
of Senator McLaurin's asserions
that while I was his secretary
e had used me as a tool to get
ther people into traps, and that he
ras going to "show up" certain
(lings, and tell how a certain politi
- - .. ... I
ewspaper correspondents of Colum
ia to task for suppressing the news.
would have paid no attention to
his, except for the fact that I had
een noticing that The Tribune was
ublishing a good deal of inspired
tuff, which I was convinced was
ased upon financial considerations,
had learned the inside of how its
ditor had secured the socalled "enorsement"
of Senator McLaurin for
overnor by certain members of the
inderson delegation. Even that did
nffnnt ma Vtanaiiao T Hirln't rflTfi.
JclStSllIg* Xig uao uv v mviiwtviiw .?
ace to me, nor have I mentioned
he campaign to him, either directly
?r indirectly.
It seems to be necessary that I
rive a brief recital of the reasons
trhich actuated me in writing a leter
to the editor of the Anderson
Mbune in1 January of this year,
rtiich seems to have aroused the
re of Mr. McLaurin, and brought
bout the confession asNto how he
iras trying to use everybody conlected
with him, for his own person1
political ambition.
During the sesion of the general
just passed-. tWp .waa_Sisticuff
between a State official and
, military officer, which was really
nore amusing than serious. At the
equest of Governor Manning, who
irged it as a war measure of conern
to the State at the particular
ime, the newspapers did not pubish
it, and I agreed not to mention
t because I was appealed - to upon
he proposition that it might interere
with the securing of funds necssary
to equip the home militia,
/hich was an organization for the
irotection of the homes of the State
mring the absence of the National
iuard at the front. Rightly or
n-ongly I yielded to the appeal and
aid nothing about it. Nobody had
een seriously hurt, anyway. A
loody nose comprised about the
ntire casualty list.
The Anderson Tribunee heard of
he affair and undertook to take the
AlkXt I'UIUClCUtc ao an imivsent
onlooker, who did not even
enow there was going to be a con'erence,
and the records down here
n the State house will show that it
vas a very few days afterwards
;hat I ceased to draw a salary from
he State warehouse system. And
ny disapproval of that conference
vas the cause of my resignation.
I have never given Mr. Cooper
iny political letter at the request of
tlr. Blease or any one else; nor have
ever furnished him with any letter
it all in any of his' campaigns for
fovernor. From the inception of this
ampaign, I have seen him only once
ir twice, when we have spoken in
~ XI/* lias nnt mantinnort Vila
;r Governor Blease, is a letter I
ivrote the editor of the Anderson Tribune
last January, and which, had
Vlr. McLaurin seen, he would probibly
have kept silent as to letters he
wrote Mr. Capers, of which I knew
ibsolutely nothing until the Columjia
State reached my home this
norning. I never even knew before
that Senator McLaurin had ever
suggested to anybody here that
noney might be secured from Capjrs
in Washington to finance a bolt
?rom the Democratic party. I never
cnew before that Senator McLaurin
lad taken me to Washington to get
ne into another trap there. I do
enow if that was his purpose that
le failed, because after I heard that
conference my resignation as secre;ary
went to Sen. McLaurin the
^ery day the official auditors finished
their check, and however much
Mr. Capers may address Senator Mc
Laurin as "My Dear Mac," there is
ibsolutely no truth in any assertion
jy anybody that I took any part in
* 6
f entious service as I was capable of. p
r If I was being used as a tool to lead r)
Blease into a trzlp I knew nothing; jr
t of it; and if I had had any such idea f
r that Senator McLaurin would use jj
h the State warehouse system for any w
t such purpose I never would have ac- p,
_ cepted a position under him, in the 0
3 first instance. e<
s The letter which Mr. McLaurin ir
e says somebody has told him has been is
i seen in the possession of Mr. Coop- ai
b er, and which he charges that I gave di
Mr. Cooper at the reqiwit^.of Form- st
e * it
^ ords checked up by official account- ^
ants, following some statement
^ which the governor had made in the ^
^ public prints in regard to the management
of the system. ^
Mr. Capers may save himself the q
r trouble of searching any files in an v
effort to find any letter a copy of g
which I may have. t.
:- Mr. McLaurin says that in order b
d to win the support of the Blease e
i, faction to his warehouse measure
I, during the extra session of 1914 he ?
e agreed to. make me his secretary. n
it His letter in this morning's State is ^
,t the first I had ever heard of that, j
e Governor Blease called the extra ses ?
y sion mainly for the purpose of get- b
ting a warehouse measure through, p
e how little tnat comerence met wnn n
lt my approval is shown by the fact a
that immediately upon my return
y J^eveEed-JEy-jggT^ g
nection with the State warehouse ^
y system on the very day that I was g
given a balance sheet upon my n
jj books by State Auditor Wideman p
r W. Bradley and Mr. Walton, special v
accountant, who were checking up c
the system, by appointment of Gov- t
I ernor Manning, upon request of j.
Senator McLaurin, who had asked .
e ii
^Avornnr fn Kvnp flip PTltlTP rGC
' his secretary as a tool to lead Blease ?
into a trap. If that was his game g
he failed, because none of Mr. Mc- c
^ Laurin's letter were ever mentioned c
by me to Mr. Blease or anybody p
else; and the Capers correspondence r
need give him no further concern, t
so far as I am affected, because I 0
can assure him that I have no copy
of any of it, nor any recollection
" of any of it. His letter in the Co- v
l~ lumbia State this morning is the t
n
first I ever heard of it. q
j_ I was present in the Evans build- v
e ing, in Washington, at a conference ii
he had with John G. Capers, in a
. which I took absolutely no part; and v
e -
McLaurin think I was charging him
1' with this is more than I can under^
stand. He may have given me dic^
tation for letters to Capers, but I
have no recollection of any letter to
Capers of any special significance,
and during my course with the
18 State warehouse system, as secre^
tary to Senator McLaurin. I never
s' tiied to secure copies of any of his
n letters and never mentioned to a
16 living soul any letter that he had
tS ever written to anybody.
ir
^ I am sorry that Mr. McLaurin felt j
that he was using me while I was j
)r In the first place, I desire to say
id that Mr. McLaurin gives some facts
which are absolutely news to me,
ly and which I had never even dream;d
ed of. He says that he "frequenter
ly called John Aull to take dictat
tion for letters on this subject ad3t
dressed to Capers," referring to seis
curing money for a bolt from the
s, Democratic party, in order to lead
Id Blease into a trap. Mr. McLaurin
states that I wrote the letters and
al retained carbon copies, but that as
h- soon as I was out of sight he destroyed
the originals.
!y This is the first time I have ever
s even heard of his writing any such
13 letters to Mr. /Capers. He seems to
ie think that I have a copy of some
^ such letter that he wrote to John G.
ie Capers in Washington. I know absolutely
nothing of any such letter
d or letters, and have never said or
13 written that I did, and I have no
^ letter purporting to be a copy of
*" any such letter. What made Mr.
his effusion which make charge
;ainst me, and t^iat you do me thi
irness to give it as prominent i
ace in your paper as you hav<
yen Mr. McLaurin's address. ,
. : Z . * ' . - * \'
.v
The statement given out by Mi
all follows:
j the Editor of The State:
The address to the people o
>uth Carolina by former Senato
?hn L. McLaurin, which you pub
ihed in your issue this morning
ems to be inspired by a lette
ritten by me last January, whicl
idently Mr. McLaurin has not ye
en seen, and I ask that you per
it me to make reply to the portion
ctance, l am wnuug xui pu w ?
spt the position." And I turne
lmediately to W. F. Blackburr
ho was in the room, 'and saic
?rank, I will appoint you privat
cretary, and I guess we can ge
ong." Mr. Blackburn replied tha
e could, because "John would b
mdy if we needed him on an
lecial matters."
I regret to have taken this muc
: your space; in fact, I though
ist as good idea as any was not t
ly any attention to. this man'
ivings and hallucinations, but fo
:ar my silence might be misundei
ood, I would be glad if you woul
ve this article the same promi
:nce that you give the article thi
orning, in which, as you put i1
McLaurin Flays Blease" and A1
cks R. A. Cooper."
COLE L. BLEASE.
Columbia, June 30,
jr he is now serving a sentence f<
le charge which was prefem
jainst him.
As to the matter of having ir
ame and McLaurin's names place
n the electoral ticket, I have nev<
eard of that before, and as a ma
>r of fact, Duncan Adams was n<
le Republican State chairman, j
perybody with any sense know
ut Joe Tolbert of Ninety-Six he!
len and holds now, that position.
As to Mr. McLaurin's personi
pinion of me, that is quite laugl
ble, after his very devoted servic
nd expenditure of time and mone
ying to put me in the governor
ffice for a third term. If I w?
ich a very bad man as he says h
new I was. whv should he attemi
> foster me once again upon tli
eople of the State?
Of course everybody knows an
is been knowing for many montl
ist that I was not supporting an
ould not support John L. McLai
n for governor. That . is wh*
akes him mad and what mkes hin
i his desperation, attempt to dra
e into his class of political deser
rs.
Referring to what he says aboi
is warehouse commissionershi]
irely the man must be out of hi
ind or have taken something whic
tused him to have hallucination:
ame of my friends talked to me i
(ference to running for warehoua
>mmissioner after the position wa
itablished, and I said that unde
) conditions or circumstances coul
accept it. And Claud N. Sap]
ten a member of the legislatur
om Lancaster County, almost spo
_ i- .j. xL
neously, you mignt say, jusc ai in
st moment, arose in his seat an
)minated Mr. McLaurin for thi
jsition. It came to him withou
ly solicitation on his part, so fa
i I am informed, and I think h
as about as much surprised whe
r. Sapp nominated him as any'ood
se was, and I addressed a con
unication to the legislature, i
hich I said:
"I congratulate you upon the pas
,ge of the acreage bill and th
arehouse bill, and upon your elect
g as manager of the warehous
stem, the logical man for th
ace?he who understands it bea
id who, if it can be made a sue
jss, surely is tKe one~to Kave~ Tfa
edit." 1 y /
Therefore, the public can readil
:e that there was absolutely n
>al with McLaurin to make Au
As to the transactions between ge
Mr. Aull and Mr. McLaurin on their ^
Washington trip, Mr. Aull reported *
this matter to me immediately upon ^
his return, for the reason, as he
stated, that he felt that it was due ^
me that I should know, and he told n(
me then that he was going to resign ^
from the warehouse commission and
cc
have nothing further to do, with it,
which he did. I saw Mr. Aull very .
gi
seldom while he was Mr. McLaurin's ^
secretary, and he has never yet said ^
one word to me. m reference to the pj
personaJX^public transactions of cg
^p/jlcLaurin as warehouse commis- y(
"sioner, except when he told me about
the Washington trip and said he was ju
going to get out immediately. And C?
there isn't a man in South Carolina
who knows John Aull but knows w
h When it came to him be promptly is
it signed it. Later Senator McLaurin | ^
o came to me and offered me the po- i
s sition of his secretary. I told him e
r I was inclined to accept it, but j
- would have to consult Governor g
d Blease, under whom I then held the ^
i- position of secretary to the govern- n
s or. Next day Mr. McLaurin came j
t, into Governor Blease's private office j
and mentioned the matter to him, in tj
my presence. I know from the con- ?
versation that ensued that that was h
the first time Mr. Blease ever knew 0
of it. I accepted the position, and v
' for two years, until I resigned fol- t]
lowing the Washington trip, I gave c
My IWnT.anrin no lnvnl and ponsci-1 _
peat a wora xnat ji nave evw ajpvnui ?
encouraging any bolt on that occa- aI
sion. This was so plain that even to
you yourself wrote an editorial, in
which you stated in your issue of si
October 13, 1916: ta
"Weeks ago The State expressed *c
unqualifiedly the opinion that exGovernor
Blease would not lead a
! bolt from the Democratic party in
I the State in the approaching general p!
election. The State adheres to that ^
opinion. ' "
m
| "The great mass of Bleaseites are
honest men who would scorn the
m
suggestion of repudiating their oaths ej
to support the nominees of the party,
State and national . . . There
will be no bolt in 1916 with the
si
aow/?Hnn nf t.he Bleaseite oreraniza
pecially as a member of the senate ^
of the United States, is such that no tl
honest-thinking man would give ere- al
dence to any statement # which ht
might make in reference to my at- n;
temptnig to bolt the Democratic 01
party, in view of my service to the 111
party in the past, and in view of
the further fact that every friend tl
that I have within the State of ei
South Carolina knows that I dis- *>'
couraged any effort at a bolt in 1916 *1
and no man can show a line that I
have ever written, or honestly re- ?]
i iL.i. r i _ al
lan had used me in an attempt to
et money to bolt the Democratic
arty, and how he was going to
lise merry political cain generally,
1 all of which I was to be the goat,
hen I heard that he was down in
ennettsville laboriously preparing
hat he considered was the greatest
olitical annunciation in the history
f South Carolina, which was former
to retire Blease and Tillman
ito oblivion, and that when he finhed
it he was going to Charlotte
nd give it to the press. That also
id not affect me, but in all these
;atements that were coming to me