The Greenville enterprise. (Greenville, S.C.) 1870-1873, September 04, 1872, Image 1
THE GREEN VILLE - ENTERPRISE.
lj? ' 5 g - - - v. f ' "'" m '
<ir>alf i >v ^ ^,^1 " t^LM **a) ^Ut4^iMHjjlV
Dcuolci) to Heu)s, Politic, ^irfgUtyntcr, flttir % 3mprotwnntt of % Stoto onb Coimtrij.
"loaTTBAILEY; EIMTOT^RO^"" ^^RIEENV^LE,^8oilTB C A RO LIN^ ^^5^"^:irWl'^sCafc'ia=i*^'^
i i ii i i l?*fc*^dMlfcd'i ??p?^?? i i+m*tm*mmm i i i ?
7 . _ ^ eer^X _ - ' --m. V ^ viJ %!^ ^ k?t? .? ' - ' ? * ? '
tfVMOHFTioif Two Dollar? par annum.
Advbrtiskxknts inserted at the rates of
one dollar per square of twelve Minion lines
(this sise I type) or lees for the first insertion,
fifty oenta each for the soooud and third insertions,
an J twouty-flve cents for subsequent
insertions. Yearly contracts will be made.
A'< advertisements must have the number
of insertions marked on them, or tboy will be
insiruiii till ordered oat, sad charged for.
Unless ordered otherwise, Advertisements
will invarialily be " displayed."
Obituary polices, at.d all matters inuring to
to the benefit of auy one. are regarded as
Advertisements.
POETRY*/ It
Noter Pays
It never pay* to Tret and scold
Wben fortune seems our foe ;
The Hotter bred will push ahead
And stride the hoarier blow.
For luok Is work.
And those who shirk
Should not lament their doom ; .
Hut yield the play,
And clear away,
That better tnon have room.
It never pay* to wreck the health
la drudging alter gain ;
And he ia eold who think* that gold
la cheapen bought with pain.
A humble lot,
A oosey cot,
Have tempted even king* ;
For station high,
That woalth will buy,
Not oft contentment brings.
REMINISCENCES
OK
PUBLIC MEN.
Bt EX QOVKKNUK B. F. FEltKY.
[CONTINCKD KltuM LAST week.]
JAMES KENT.
Chancellor Kent is known to
the wliolo civilized world a? a distinguiohed
jurist and coiniiieiiia^
tor on English and American law.
Llis decisions are quoted and his
Coinmeiitai ics read wherever the
common law is kuowi. and practiced.
Jb ew uihii ill America or
England have let; oeinnd liiem a
inure enviable reputation as a
Judge, Chancellor and judicial
writer. lie presided in lite Jaw
Court of Mew Vork sixteen years,
and leu )ea>s a> (Jlnot Justice.?
lie was liieu elected Chancell ji' ui
thai great blatc, and cuiiliuued to
serve in that lugu oiiice till he arrived
at the age ut sixty, wLeu he
had to retire truiu the bench, under
the provision ot tne iSuue Constitution,
limiting the judicial term
tu that age. Lie then became I'lotessur
ui Law in Columbia College,
Mew York, and delivered a series
ot lectured to numerous classes tor
several ) ears. Those lectures were
aher winds published in lus ' Cum
inentaries on Aineiican Law."?
Mo law work ever published in the
United bluU-s had such a run us
these coin men tut'lea? ihev passed
through ten edil.ons before the
deatii ot ttioir author, i'liey be
came to ilie American lawyer what
biackstuiicV v>t)imneinai les bad
been to the English lawyer.
Chancellor Kent was born in
(lie 8iate ot Mew York. i'uiiiaui
Count), J ulj 3i, 1703. Uis father
was a lawyer, and tor.a number of
yearn Surrogate or i'robaio Judge
of Jttcnaaeluer (Jounty. lie graduated
ai Yale College, iu his oigh
teetitl) year, aud wan admitted lo
tbe liar in 1785, being tiieu twenty-two
years old. it la said that
lie *'60011 became remarkub-e
among bis contemporaries for bis
legal learning and literary attainments.'
lie was elected a member
ot tlie Legislature iu 179U
ainJ 1792,'aiid became an active
and leading Federalist. Tbe iieX?
year be was a candidate tor Congress,
in Dutchess County, and defeated.
Thereupon, be moved to
tim City of New 1 ork, and in X79U
be was again elected a member ol
(be (State Legislature from that
city, in early lite be was tbe fa*
vurhe of such men aa Cbiet J uatieti
Jay aud Alexander Hamilton, lie
died in tbe eighty-tilth year of bis
age, aud remaitjed in full posses
sioii of his health aud mental posy
era up lo the period ot his death,
In 1821 be was a member of the
Slate Convention of New York
and took an active part in tbe do
bates on their. uew Constitution.
In 1886 there was considerable
discussion in South Carolina or
the subject of our judiciary. J
was then a mem her oi the l*egiela
ture, and thought it would Ibe t
great mailer to have the opinioi
of so distinguished and e*perienc
ed a Judge as Chancellor "Kent oi
the question of atnalgauiatiug tin
Courts oi Equity and Law ; and al
so as to the propriety ot a sepurah
Court of Appeals. I was tnysej
in tavor of blending the jnrisdic
tion of Law and equity in om
Court, but keeping the practici
and proceedings in Law and Equi
ty separate and distinct, thougl
administered by the same Judge
1 was also in favor of a separai
Piiiirt .it' A uiw?ala tA IioQl* all an
vwu > ? v? AA^I'VWIV^ vv I1VMI OH up
peals in Law and Equity, instem
i>f the Circuit Judges meeting t
Hear appeals at law, and the Chan 1
cellors meeting to dispose of ap- t
peals in Equity. I thereiore wrote c
to Chancellor Kent, asking him to \
give me hie views on these impor- i
tant questions. Iu reply to my a
letter, lie kindly wrote me as foi- e
lows, but with the injunction that r
I was not to publish his letter at r
th^t time; but I can see no ftnpro a
(iriety now in giving publicity to s
the views which he then express a
ed. They will be read with inter i
est by those who have given any e
consideration to the establishment e
of our judiciary system. Mr. Pet- tj
igrn was a member of the Legisla- a
ture at that time, and bitterly op- d
posed to uniting the two jnriedic o
tiona in one court. He was em- h
phaticnlly a conservative in all I
things and had the highest regard t
for the Englislfrsystetn of jnrispru p
deuce I well remember the dis- o
satisfaction l-e expressed as Chair t!
man of the Judiciary Committee, 6
when my Bill to blend tne Courts i
of Equity and Law came up for ti
consideration before his Commit* n
tee. He said, u Have we at last v
come to the humiliation of consid- ii
cring ilie question ??t "amaigama h
ti >n !'" What would this proud t<
??ld conservative lawyer say now, a
it* ho weie alive, to the Radical ii
changes which have been made in i a
our luws, our practice and our g
courts, under the present regiino c
in Soui h Carolina ? t
Nkw York, Aug. 4, 1836. v
Dear Sir: 1 have the pleasure v
ol acknowledging your obliging 11
letter of the 20th tilt, and I should h
have d<?no it sooner, had riot my a
absence from the city for some ^
weeks declined the letter from me *'
until a day or two ago.
1 have attended to the questions ^
you state, but I have a ver> great.,,*
reluctance to give my opinions, c
unless confidentially and privately, ^
"on great political and constitution ^
al points, and measures which are \
to undergo public discussion. If J
sue!) questions came before mo in 11
any situation and under any char- ;8
ac er in which it became adutj' to 11
speak, no person would do it witli 8
more promptitude and frankness; 8
but I do not like to be intrusive, r
or appear to set any great value 11
on iny own speculations. The two 8
questions you state are very grave 1
and debatable questions The first a
question is, whether the Couits of ?
Law and Eunitv ought, in sound 8
wisdom and true policy, to he ^
blended in the same tribunal,
though under the restriction of r
keeping the suits and proceedings ^
in Law and Equity distinct, as r
though they were tno records of
two distinct jurisdictions ; or whether
they ought to be totally distinct
tribunals, as on the English model.
Now, I do'not think it would be ;
come me to bo dogmatic on this
question. Statesmen are much divided
in oninion concernincr it. and
our opinions are very much the
creaturea of education and practice.
. i
I \vn6 c located in a State which t
followed closely the English model i
until 1823. and I have tried prac 8
tically both systems, when kept (
perfectly separate, being ten years t
Chancellor without any chancery r
power in the Supreme Court any 8
more than in the 0. B., and being c
ten years Chancellor without any i
more connection with or influenced bv
Courts of Law than the English I
Chancellor. It was to be exacted c
that I was for that system, and 8
would be adverse to the scheme 1
introducer! by the New York Con- f
font ion, in 1821, of blending the *
systems in a partial degree. My t
speeciiefl in that conventi^h were j
against it, and they are to be eeen I
in the debates of New York Con- t
ventiun, published in 1321. That t
' convention left the Chancellor as i
he now axists with much abridg- I
1 tnenf of his sole and vest Equity t
1 powers, and with a deposit of part 'J
1 of it concurrently in circuit Courts, t
held hy common law judges. This t
mixed iurisdietioii urevails to this t
"r"pf ' " 1
day ; but, wbatover be the cunse, <
' the administration of justice in t
1 this State in Equity is extremely t
dilatory. and not popular with the I
profession. Nor is the adrninis i
5 t rat ion of justice at law so efficient j
! and influential and popular as it <
1 was formally under the nisiprius ]
system, when the Judges of the '
1 Supreme Court rode the circuits, i
1 There is 6o great a diversity in the <
organization of ttie Courts of Law j
1 and Equity in the several States, j
3 that wecatinot resort for authority I
' to the practice in oue State, for in i
3 the very next State, perhaps, wo
1 meet with a contrary authority.-*- ,
1 There are but very few States in
3 which Equity jurisdiction resides i
3 so absolutely in one tribunal as in
|N England, to a great degree ; and i
J as itdid iu New York most entire
- ? ? J ?ci tlm uiLaIa t i mo
IV HUU ?U*VIU?W/, ?M? ? ? ?
6 I was Chancellor.
It is certain, that 1 am for the
11 old system, both as to chancery
o and as to the nisi frit* system at
aw; and it is equally certain that
ho current of the times has set detided
ly the other way, and it we
vere to have another convention
n this Siate, I believe they would
ibolish the conrt of chancery as a
eparate tribunal. The times aie
evolutionary?alarmingly so. All
>ld principles of law abd liberty,
,nd all the notions of the ancient
ages In this country and elsewhere
ira H inoo rrtort ann Haantaa<t onrt
iltraium is the spirit of the day in
verythin^. I endeavor to stand
uper aurtquas view, and adhere to
he notions of Severn men t.and contitutional
ptdicy, and jurisprulence
that swayed the wise men
f. this country from 1787 to the
aginning of the present century.
Jut 1 stand iu comparative soliude,
and almost all my containtorariee
who entertained the same
pinions that I did, and imbibed
hem from the same fountains, are
wept away.
I perceive that I hate anticipaed
your second question also; and
iow, as to what I would do If I
pere in your place, I should bo i
nfluenced by circumstances, and
trive for the best practicable sysem
The mixed tribunal of Law
nd Equity prevails in Scotland, i
u the English Court of Exchequer,
nd iu the Courts of most of the
hates; and I should not be tena*
ions ot my .own views, if I found
hat they were not palatable ana
rould not be adopted. Just so
virh the nisipriua system. I have
10 doubt that Judges ot the Sn>remo
Court riding circuits, and
cting singl), gives vigor and des?atch
to business, and adds weight
o the Court and saves ereat tron
>le and delay when they are at the
3ar to explain on motions for new
rials, and on points reserved. It
ertainly worked admirably in
"few York, not. only under the
)olotiy administration, but since
he Revolution, down to 1823, and
udgcs of the Supreme Court had
nuch greater influence and re
pect than the loeal circuit judges
mw have. However, I am not
tire that we could go back to that
ystem, if we had a convention to
eview our system. The other ;s
note popular because more diffuive,
weak and accessivo. It is
trobably as good as the doctrines
iiid impulses of too times will tolirate,
and I should be willing to
Lcquiesce in any plan that will
:eep us from more radical changes.
I write confidentially for the
.easons already suggested, And I
>eg leave to add the assurances of
ny respect and esteem.
JAMES KENT.
B. F. Pkkby. > ^
[OONTINGED NEXT WEEK.]
FARM AND HO?E.
from me i,uurti\4v\iu iieruia.
What wo Need in the South.
Mr. Editor :?I expect to deal
n Some unpalatable truths, but if
heshofe.tifS us we ouj?ht unflinch
ugly to bear the pain, until we
ire wise enough to reform. We
Jarolinirtii8 have been affected
vith monomania In our agricultu<<
nl pursuits. We go into a thing
md rnn it to the extreme. We
lo not have great enough variety
n our crops. If our main Btaple
?cotton and corn?fails, we are
>adly injured, not having any
>ther food crop to fall back upon,
md no money to purchase with.?
iVe depend upon the corn-crib to
bed our horses, hogs, (if we have
my,) poultry and hands; the coton
to buy bacon and flour and
>ay taxes, Doctors* and guano
>ills. Ilow can we stand up
inder such a continual drain upon
liese two crops? We must sow
nore small grain?wheat, oats,
parley and rye, nnd grasses to
eed our stock, hands and families,
fbese crops will not be near so
ixpeusive to cultivate, and so
ix'iaustive to our lands. Wc can
;hen dispense with some of our
?xtra mules and hands, and lessen
ho expenees. We keep entirely
ioo much stock on our farms, uii
oss we improve them by introduces
better breeds. Wo must
plunt a greater variety of root
>rope and fruits. Tbero are
plenty of these small crops that
will pay us more money to the
aero than cotton, with less expense
jf cultivation. I have now in
mind a good old farmer who has
not, to iuy recollection, in the last
twenty years made but one hale
ol cotton iu a single year ; always
baa plenty grain, milk and butter,
and good fat stocknever in debt
?pays as he goes, Take ope
small item. Lie sells annually, I
will sa>, $50 worth of seed potatoes.
1 never kppw him to fail jln
keeping seed, and his yams are
renowned Jbr sweetness and size.
What is the cause ot his continued
success iu farmiug t It is
this: tie has never dabbled
much in cotton, and has alwaye
'
uiade his own grain and maat,
with a good surplus to sell.
Next, we have as good water*
powers as there is in the world ;
and agriculture and manufactures
should go band in band. Our
land ought to be filled with machine
shops and cotton factories.
We have the timber and cotton,
and ought to work it at home, iif
order to lessen expense of trans-!
portation and encourage emigration
of uMIImI lnhni*
Every farm of any size, qhogki
have a workshop attached, to put
up their own tools, aud learn the
young men good trades. And
during the winter months and
r?iny days, tbey can always be
profitably employed. N<?w, I see
young men rooming through the
country, fishing, hunting, visiting
orchard and watermelon patches
?have nothing to do.. The crops
are laid by, and they.are patiently
waiting tor gatluering time, and
all expenses have to come out of
these crops; while if tfaey would
roll up their sleeves and go into
some honest occupation they
would make it profitable, instead
of being a nuisance to their work-'
ing neighbors. Their parents Are
Badly to blame for this state of affairs?for
not encouraging their
children to labor. Work never
has, nor never will be, a disgrace
to any man. I recollect before
the war it was almost considered
a disgrace to be seen at field labor
that nobody but negroes ought to
do such drudgery 1 .Times have
changed?the reality of honest
labor is upon us. We will have
to go in with a willing heart, or
be counted worthless drones upon
society. Our agricultural tools
and stock are a disgrace to any intelligent
farming community.?
Horses so poor that we are ashamed
to bo seen in public riding
them. How can it be bettered ?
Only by commencing a revolution
in our farming. Our cows are
still the long horned, sway-backed
and slab sided stock, our fathers
had forty years ago. In wintor,)
unsheltered?so poor they can
hard/y stand up?-nothing to f^ed ]
them on but shucks.
Mr. Editor, it would take a
man of powerful stomach to
drink this milk, if be would only
take a peep at the cow that gives
it. During the war I counted 26
calves in passing one of -my neigh
bor's, and saw the milk-maid returning
with two blue buckots,
not full of milk. In the natno of
common sense 1 what is the rise in
keeping such stock ? No milk,
no butter, no beet, save a little
unsavory stuff in grass time.
Now, for our hogs. Tho same
old-time breed?long-nosed, landpike
stock, that, look like the last
running ot shad. Why are they
so poor, and such a nuisance to
crops? Because we don't have
good pastures to keep them regu
larly. In the winter we put up
tho frames to fatten. It takes just
twice as much corn as it would
to fatten a close, round made
breed of hogs 1 A deep drain
again upon the corn crib. Is this
economy and good farming ?
Again, why are we paying such
exorbitant prices for fertilizers!
It is because we do not pen our
stock, and save their manure.?
How can we succeed when we are
so wasteful, and will not take advantage
of the means that kind
Providence has so lavishly thrown
in our way ? It makes tne sick at
heart to see our indolence and
wastefulness, and hear the continued
complaint of hard times.?
The times are inst as good as they
avap wafa. Wa nrn tnnnrl want.
ing ourselves.
A word on the education of onr
childrenJ Now, farmers, quit
making slaves of yourselves to
raise np yonr children in indolence.
Learn them to labor regularly
as well as send them to
school. Qnit the old role 6t sending
them to high schools two or
three years, and to college three
or four years?keeping them at
school from infancy nntil they are
grown ; and when thoy come out,
they are not fit lor anything but
aotuu profession. No health, no
muscle, no training in agricultural
pursuits, We cannot all live
iu the shade- Some must live by
the sweat ot the brow- What an
amount of money has been spent
on education 1 .Jrarenta have stinted
themselves for dm purpose of
making their children shine in society.
who come out so fine and
polished that they are really
ashamed of their old-fashioned
ancestors.
I am highly in favor of education
't bur mix a little of the phya
ieal in with tbo intellectual?make
ihciu fit for the occupation you
wish them to follow. Don't try
to make them all John 0. Calhoun's?brains
or no brains. It is
uselessly throwing tnonev awav.
I was talking not long since
with a yonng man who wa* edu
catod in the beat inatitution of the <
land, who unhesitatingly affirmed
that the monejr, expended ou his
i education bad better been thrown
into the sea. Lost health,, bad ,
morals were no compensation for. i
the outlay. One of tbe most eeti- i
uiable ladlca in tbe country baa '
often told me she neror looked tor
?? > mn.k I I
*? ?/ "vi ?v wmv vi u?r uaugui^n
when tbey return froro college.? '
They were ashamed of honest la?
bor?only thought of dressing two
or tbfte times a day, and reoeff*
Sm, ddtypany. . Ooght these;
things to .be so? Who are to
blame! Thfe parents, for tl?e
manner in wfriah they have their i
children instructed 1
" By sending children to school 1
so much from home, one ' may
make them highly iiftelftgent; but
it is not worth, much for the prac
1 tieal elide of life." vIf WO would
jndickuisly nse some of this
1 money in adorning and beautify
ing our homes ana improving our
farms, we would make thorn .at- '
tractive, and a home'indeed to
tlnim: but by laying it ont in college
learning, fine clothing and
jewelry, we are sorely laying the
ground work of discontent in their J
minds, and rendering tbein dissatisfied
with their old homes.
. There is too much of the repeat 1
er style and whisky-bottle fi urisli 1
in our young men. Too much encouragement
in our young ladies I
to such conduct. The hind will
mourn until there is a reformation.
SALUDA.
What Next??In the upper
part of Leo county lives a gentle- r
man who had a bull dog of the
female persuasion which nad five
puppies. In a fight with a huge
moccasin she was bitten several
times and died of the wounds.?
The pups were only twenty days
old. lie prized theui muchly, and
devised the following fur their support.
He had a female goat which
had lost her kids. He caught the
goat and taught the pups to draw
their daily lecteal rations from her.
But he had to catch her first with
another uog 8he became shy and
wouldn't come about the house, so
he had to go with his dog after her,
in a few days she learned what
she had to do and now all he. does
is to see her, whistle for his dog
and she makes for the house, leaps
i.1. . I t - ?'
me yuru ienco ana cans up uer
strange nurselings, and while in
the yard she will not allow the
dog to approach them and appears
very much attached to them.?
The pups should be uatned Romulus
and Remus.?Swnter Repub
lioan.
Guard the Weak Spot.?All
incn, however ..strong, have a
weak spot, like the rhinoceros,
which, though planted like a monitor,
is vulnerable to a spear
thrnst below the places. Satan
is not such a fool as to attack the
Strong defences ; he would be sure
to thrust at the vulnerable points.
Some, indeed, think they have no,
weak place; and such people are
right, for they are weak all over^
and no part, therefore, could be
called weak in particular. The
J>olar bear has a weakness, which
s for blubber, and his hunters
knowing this, coil a piece of
whalebone like a watch spring,
wrap it in blubber and freeze it.?
They then drop the tempting morsel
in the way of a bear, who
swallows greedily ; but as soon as'
the blubber melts in bis stomach,
the whalebone springs oat. The
bear then rolls over in agony, and
*- j I'll i _ mi
mey, come up arm kui uun. Anus
it is when a man yields to an easy
in, it will Cut them asunder.
[Dr. H. M. Set'dder.
An exchange eays that it knows
of a boy who accidently swallowed
a silver half-dollar. They gave him
warm water i\pd tartar-emetic, and
antiinonial wine, and poked their
.'fingers down his throat, until the
boy thought he would throw np his
toe-nails. After awlnle a doctor
came along who nnderstood such
caSes. lie administered a small
dose of patent medicine, and in less
than ten minutes the boy threw
up the half-dollar in five-cent pieces.
Science is a great thing.
Toe seven wonders of the ancient.
world, were the Colossus at
Rhodes, the Temple of Diana at
Bphostts, the Sepulchre of Mausolus
Ring of Caria. the 8tatne of
1J rifnter by Phidias, the Great Wall
of Babylon, the Pyramids of Egypt,
aud the Palace of Gyrus.
"?* Avoid those who tako pleasure
in exposing others to contempt by
jeering, mocking or caiinicing.?
K..Ark nflf from snoh as from the
Iioui?ot? horse that kick* all noar
I r'?'
i General Kil pat rick \b stumping
for Greeley and Brown,
1 i
T-1 1 '
Proceedings of United States Court.
Mowsay, Avgut 58th, 1875.
n>? Court vu opened at 11 o'olook A. M.
Frtittit t Hod. Coo. 8. Bryan, DUtrfct Judge,
presiding. The Jhrere ana wo red to their
MmM'a* on prarrtoaa day*. The Qrand Jury
returned into Court with the following
rrue Bllla t
The United State* *. WOllaua Hrana?retail
liquor dealer without paying special tar.
The Untied States ti. Fanny Kelt;?retail
ltftuor dealer without paying epeelal tax.
The United Statee *. laham Moeeley?rea.ft
en? -a- ?
urn nquor ?Min without paring epeoial tax.
Tba UoiUd BUtfi vs. Herbert Germany? !
distiller without paying special tax.
Tha United State* vs. Ooinell?
wholaaala liquor doaler without paying spes
ofal tax.
Tha "Wlte4 8tataa ve. By 0. Haok?illegal
removal and eonooalment of diatilled spirit*.
Tha United State* ve. John Mull and Marlon
Britton?fraudulent removal of diatilled
spirits--W. A. Stone, Aasiatant District Attorney
for United State*; flon. 1). F. Perry
for Defendants. Motion was made for eontinuaaaa,
which waa resisted by the Government.
After hearing argument, the Oourt ordered:
That continuance be allowed on ?ondition of
testimony of United States soldiers being ta- I
ken da ban* aaaa.
The United 8tates vs. W J Harbin, $200, 1
Principal; J U Barns, $200, Ball; J M Brown, j
|200, Bail?default of recognisance to testify.
Scire Facias discharged, witnesses reporting
before service of writ.
The United 8tates vs. J H Burns, $200,
Principal; J M Brown, Bail, $200; W J Harbin,
Bail. $200?default of rocognisanee to
testify?same order as above.
The (Ailted States vs. J M Brown, Principal,
$200; J if Burns, Bail, $200 ; W J Harbin,'
Bail, $200?default of reooguisaace to
testify?same order as above.
The United States vs. B F Qant, Principal,
$200 ; W D Holland, Bail, $200?defanlt
recognisances to testily?same order a* above.
The United States vs J A Gaines, Principal,
$250; E N Bynnin, Bail, $250?default on re?
cognisance to answer, and not appearing to
receive sentence. The Defendant baviDg
failed to comply with condition, on motion ef
District Attorney, Ordered; That a writ of
8cire Facias Issue, returnable September ?,
1872.
The United States vs Jocoph McJcwell?
distillation without paying special tax. Verw
diet, Not Quilty. On motion of Arthur for
defence it is ordered : Tbat Defendant be discharged,
and his reooguitance be marked satisfied.
The United States ex parte John J ilousoal,
creditor, in re Motte A Tarrant, debtor?Petition
of involuntary bankruptcy?Baxter A
Johnston pro pet. Ordered ; That debtors
shew eauso 9th September whey they should
not be declared baukrupts.
The United States vs Isham Moseley?retail
liquor dealer without paying special tax.
Verdict, Guilty. Sentonced to six months'
imprisonment and to pay a fine of (fl,000)
one thousand dollars.
The United States ex parte J T Peterson,
Assignee, in re M Chapin, Bankrupt?petition
for salo. Fair, Pope A Pope pro pet. Ordered:
That the Assignee pay the Creditors as
roported by Register.
Court then adjourned till to-morrow at IX
s'elook A M.
Tuxauar, August 27, 1872.
The Grand Jury returned into Court with
the following True Bills :
Th# United States vs Jas II Jennings?illegal
concealing ot distilled spirits.
The United States rs Willis Bruce?illegal
removal and retailing of distilled spirits.
Tb? United Statos vs Jeremiah Tinsley?
obstructing revenue officer.
No Bill was r?turned in tbe following cue;
. Tbe Baited Statee re Jne Scott alias Jack
Scott?retail liquor dealer without paying
peeial tax.
' Tbe United States ?? Wm Erins?retail liquor
dealer without paying special tax. July
charged with this cue returned verdict of
Guilty. Ordered: That a Bench Warrant issue
to bring Wm Bvins into Court, and that
scire facias isiue on his recognizance to an*
ewer.
The United States vs Fanny Kelly?retail
ltqnor dealer without paying special tax.
Verdict, Not Guilty.
The United States vs John Foster?distiller
without payiog special tax. Jury rendered
ysrdict Guilty. Sentence?aix months' imprisonment
and one thousand (1,000) dollars'
flue.
| The United States vs Mcrida Trammel?
I elding in the fraudulent romoral of distilled
spirits. Verdict, Guilty.
Wkd5xsp.it, August 23th, 1873.
The Orand Jury returned into Court with
tho following No BUI*:
The United States vs Jacob Scott?illegal
removal of distilled spirits.
The United States vs Thomas L Binder?
retail liquor dealer without paying special tax.
Truo Bill Wat returned In the follow lug
oaae :
Ths United States vs Darld Davis?Illegal
eodeealmeot of distilled spirits.
The United State* ri Joel Hughe*?found
guilty ti)d MOteeced for violation of Internal
Revenue Law.
The United Statea va Willie Druoe?retail
liquor dealer without paying apeoia) tax. Verdict,
Guilty.
The United Statea va Terril J. Pott*?fraudulent
removal of diatilled spirit*?Section
36, Aot July SO, 1WS. Verdict, Guilty.
Th* Onxiow aim Fxkliso Nobtii ?Col.
Wm. Johnaon ha* returned home, after en
nheenea af aome tan daja. He vialted tht
Greeley Executive Committea lo Wathiogton
and New York, They are active, en<
. urge tie, and confidant of aueeeea. Th<
whale North ie ablaxe with enthueiaam foi
Greeley. He met very few, Indeed, wh<
were for Grant; one oL the few, a ah odd)
millionaire, gave aa a reaaon for oppoeta|
Mr Oreeley that he he* always favored th<
noor man and Uhnn* 1K? Unntli In St
poverty, will not object to him oa tha
Mora. Tha Colonel that a atraogai
oonW malic* tha change* going on. Th
deaaat man of tha Republican party ar
rapidly leaving Grant.
[CharlotU (AT. C.) Southern Horn*.
i That Kythioal "Armed Force."
In February, 18(59, the Qeneral Assembly
puwJ resolution authorising the Governor
| to arm and eqnlp a company of ono hundred
I wen for the defence of the Stat*. Under this
resolution a body ef constabulary Was organised,
and a large sun of money was expended.
There being no further use for the " armed
force," If there ever was any, It was supposed
to be disbanded. It appears, however, that
sinoe the first of November last $82,423.30
have been drawn from the 8tate Treasury on
account of this very armed fores; this huge
disbursement being made, as Judge Willard
vt ui oapreme court says, "in a year which
ao necessity f or a resort on the part of the
State to military " foree la known to have existed,
and when the resources of the State are
inadequate to meet the current expenses of
the government, or to provide for a proper administration
of Joatioe."
For our own part, we do not believe that
the Armed Force is in existence. We believe
that the money was oorruptly used by Governor
Soott in staving off the linpeaehtnont resolutions
last winter. The list of persona who
received the money tells the talo only too
plainly :
J. Mooney, (unknown) .$25,545 00
D. H. Wilson, (unknown) ... 12,500 00
F. J. Moses, Jr., 8peaker Ho. Repp., 11,000 00
J. Leggett, (unknown) 10,000 00
R. B. Elliott, col., Mem. Congress, 10,500 00
John B. Hubbard, Chief of State
Constabulary 5,800 00
Employees of Adj. General's office.. 1,015 00
8. L. Hoge, ex-Congressman, exJudge,
Ao 1,000 00
U. Q. Worthington, Hoge's law
partner 600 00
Mqjor Louis Merrill, Fourth United
States Cavalry, Brevet Lieutenant
Colonel United States Army, 500 00
Robert Smalls, colored 8tate Senator
from Beaufort County 500 00
C. L. Anderson, Assistant Adjutant
General 380 00
Greenville and Columbia Railroad
VUlupHDJ ?... 316 25
T. Sullivan, (unknown) 321 00
J. Kennedy, (unknown) 300 00
Prince R. Rivers, colored Repres
scntative from Edgefield County.. 300 00
E. Cain, colored Representative
frou. Abbeville County 270 00
Rev.Wm. M. Thomas, colored Rop.
rosentutive from Colleton County, 125 00
F. J. Maddocks, colored Represent
tative from Colleton County 125 00
R. W. Cousart, Radical Representative
from Lancaster County 100 00
Sam'l J. Keith, colorod Representative
from Darlington County.. 100 00
J. A. Green, Radical Senator from
Orangeburg ; Chairman Senato
Finance Committee 100 00
Dr. Patten 00 60
John Lilly CO 00
C. D. Lowr.des 50 00
M. W. Allen .. 50 00
W. J. Whipper, colored Representative
from Boaufort; Chairman
House Finance Committee 48 00
South Carolina Railroad Company, 19 65
C. M. Wilder 19 60
D. A. Jones 16 25
F. Y. Harper 13 50
C. H. Greeno 10 50
John C. Dial 5 89
Total $82,423 30
So the Spoaker of the House gets $11,000.
Congressman Elliott gets $10,500. Chief Constable
Hubbard gets $5,866. Ex-Congressman
Iloge gets $1,000. Members of the Leg*
islaturc get from $500 to $48. Unknown persons,
presumed to be men of straw, receive
sums ran a in <? fmr* eot m *- *""*
0?? 10 ijuu. vvtint
did those men?the reel men?do (or this mom
ey f Is Moses, or Hoge, or Elliott, or Whip.,
per, or Wortbington, a member of the Armed
Force? We do not believe a word of it.?
They have now the opportunity of explanation.
Let each man of them come forward
and show what service, If honest service, ho
has rendered. But they can't do it. Tbey
will await in trembling the vigorous proseoution
which will prove, by the reeords, who
was the briber and who vera the bribed.
In Columbia it is universally believed that
nearly all the " Armed Force " expenditures
were consumed in bribery. And, with the
names and figures beforo them, it is hard to
see how any scnsiblo person can reach a different
conclusion.? Charleston A'ctcs.
- - ? ? -* ?
STATS AND OTHER ITEMS.
Mr. Britton Allabrooks, a citizen of Cla*
rendon coonty, was born in 1777, is conset
qoenlly in his ninety-flfth age. lie is hale
and strong, being able at this Jimc to put
op a wagon, cart or any other vehiole unassisted.
Dakota advices tell of grasshoppers in
sueh vast swarms as to obseure the sun, cov.
er the earth an inch thick, and eat up
twenty five aere crops clean in a single afternoon
They ara no better than eaterpillera
or carpet-bagger*.
There were forty deaths in Charleston
for the week ending (he 17th?whites 13 ;
colored 27.
M?j. T. Jarinan Elford died at Union, on
the 9th inak He was a member of the Palmetto
Regiment during the Mexiean war,
and will be remembered by the members of
Jenkins' Biigade at the efficient commissary
of that command, during the late war.
A nombti of tha Orant ore?n? ?? *? -1
ready aeleeted Oharlea O.Conor, of Now
York, as their oendidata for the Presidency
at the coming 8tr?it-o< t Convention at
1 Louieville. These Grant organa, by the
1 way, oannot find warda auffiaiently expreaaiteof
their admiration of the magnitude
and importance of this atraigbUout ocheme.
Mr. Wa?. Petty, of Union County, 1o?t
hie four children within eight day*. The
flret, aged nine year* died on Saturday, the
8d inet; (he aeaond, aged eleven, on
Friday, the 9th ; the third, aged four, died
the eame day about an hour after the around
; and the fourth, aged fourteen, died
the day fo'lowtng. The laat three were bu-j
ried on the eama day. The dlaeaae waa
, probably Cerebraipinal Meningilia.
Cotton picking hi* commenced in dead
earnest ahont Barnwell.