Camden gazette and mercantile advertiser. (Camden, S.C.) 1818-1822, December 13, 1821, Image 2
?* - mrnrnm . " ? IJII. Jl>
! J K ES 1 1) E N r 8 M E s - A G E.
WAhW*fcT<W, ULCKMBfcU ? J
At t* o'clock this (I a\ , the Pr?si-|
dent of the L'nited States tians
mitted to both Houses of Congress,
by Mr. ?. L. Gouverneur, the
fallow ing
MESSAGE:
.'W/ow Citizen * of the Senate,
and of the House of Rcfireaentativea :
The progress of otir affairs since
the last session has heen such as may!
justly I hi claimed and expected, un
der a government deriving all its
powers from an enlightened people,
aivl under laws formed by their re- !
preservatives, on ?reat consideration, ;
for the sole purpose of promoting tUe:
welfare and happiness of their con-;
stitueuts. In the execution of those
laws, and of the powers vested by
the constitution in the Executive, un
, ' j
remitted attention has been paid to
the great objects to which they ex-1
tend. Iii the concerns which arc!
j
exclusively internal, tbt<* is good
cause to be satisfied with ine result.
The jaws have had their due opera-!
tion and effect. In those relating to!
foreign powers, I am happy to state, j
that peace and amity are preserved j
with all, by a strict observance, on
both sitH?, of the rights of 'each.?
In matters touching our commercial
intercourse, where a difference of
opinion has existed, in any case, as
to the conditions ou which at snould
be placed, each party has pursued:
its own policy, without giving justj
cause ot offence to the other, in:
this annual communication, especial-;
]y vhen it' is addressed to a new?
Congress, the whole scope of our
political couceras naturally comes
into view ; thai errors, it such have!
heen committed, may be corrected ;
that defect's, which have become
manifest, may be remedied ; and on'
the other hand, that measures which1
were adopted on due deliberation,
and which experience hf*s shown are
jual in themselves, and essential to
the public welfare, should be perse
vered in and supported. In per
forming this necessity and very im
portant duty, I shall endeavour to
place before you, on its merits, every
subject that is thought to be eutitled
to your 'particular attention, in ajf dis
tinct and clear ajight as 1 may be
able.
By an art of the 3d of March}
181.), sq much of the several acts as
imposed -higher luties on the tonnage
of foreign vessels, and ou the #ian
ufuctures and productions of foreign
nations, w hen imported into the tiuit
ed Urates' in foreign vessels. than
when imported iu vessels of the
United States, . were re|n*ale<^ so
far as respected the manufactures
and predictions of (he Datiriji to
which such vessel belonged, on the,
conffjrio.i, that the repeal should
tike effect only in favor of any for
eigu nation, when the lixedutive
? ? u * ' r II "
should bo satisfied that such discri
. ftinating duties, to tl^e disadvantage
of the United States, had likewise
beernre ptaied by suchpatioo. By
this act a proposition wps marie to ail
tiaiioiis to place onf commerce with
each tm a basis, which, it was pre
sumed, would be accejpta He t<* all
Kvejry nation was allowed to brina;
its manufactures and iroductiott* in
to our ports, in their *own vessels,
on the same conditions that thr\
tna^ltt (>e tyansported in vrs?elsA>f
tin* United States; and# in^ rotuffr,
it was repaired that a Iilie aonommo
dation .should be granted tolhe ves
sel* of the ? nited States in the ports
of other powers. The articles to be
admitted, or prohibited, on either
side, formed no part of the propos
ed arrangement. Each pjfrty would
retaiu the right to admit m prohibit
such articles, from the other, as it
thought proper, and on its owu con
dition. V /' *
When the nature n t tire commerce
between the United States and ever$
other country was takwn into view,
it u as thought thirl this proposition
would he consiihred fair, and even
liberal, by emy power. I he ex
ports ol thr. United Htates rcn?i?*l
^cuc rally of articles of the Hist ue*
ccssitv. nnd of rude n?alerials in de- 1
in a nil for foieigu ma i u;?u lories, of
peat bulk, requiring foi their trans
portation many vessels, the return
for w hicb, i? the manufactures and
productions uf any foreign country,
even when disjnwed of there to ad i
vantage, roaj be brought in a single
vessel. This observation is more
especially applicable to those coun
tries from w^di manufactures alone |
are imporieu^iut it applies, in a I
great extent, to the European do- I
minions of every European power, I
and, in a certain extent, to all the I
colonies of those powers. By plac- I
ing, llieiu the navigation precisely I
on the same ground, in the trauspor- I
tat ion of exports and imports^ l>e- I
countries, it was presumed that all 1
was offered which could be desired, I
It seemed to he the only proposition |
which could be devised, which would I
retain even the semblance of equali- I
ty in our favor* ? ? _. * I
Many considerations of great I
weight gave us a right to expect that 1
this commerce should l>e extended to I
the colonies, as well as to the Euro- I
pean dominions, of other powers. I
With the latter, especially with I
countries exclusively manufacturing, I
the advantage was manifestly on I
their side. An indemnity for that I
loss was ex|>ceted from a trade with I
the colonies, and, Willi the greater]
reason, its it was know ? tlnuoe snp- |
(dies which the colonies derived fioui
us were of the highest importance to I
tltem, their labor being bestowed I
with so much greater profit in the I
culture of other articles; and be- I
cause, likewise, the articles of wl'ch I
those supplies consisted,, forming so [
large a pro|Kirtion of tins exports of I
the L direct btaies, were never ad I
mttted into any of the ports of Eu- I
rope except in cases of great enter- |
gency, to avert a serious calamity. I
When no article is admitted which is |
not required to supply the wants of |
the party admitting it, and admitted I
then, nut in favor of any particular I
country, to the disadvantage Of oUiars* |
but on conditions equally applicable I
to all, it seems just that the articles I
thus admitted and invited should be ]
carried thither in the vessels of the 1
country affording such supply, and I
that the reciprocity should be found I
in a corresponding accommodation on
the- other side. By allowing each I
party,. o participate in the transporta-l
tion of such suppliis, on the piiy-l
nif.nl of equal tonnage, a. strong I
proof was afforded of an arrommo- I
dating spirit. To abfthrffttl to it the I
transpot latino oOlfe whole would 1
be a sacrifice w hich ought not. to lie
expected. i he demand, in tl?e pre- I
sent instance, wonld be the more nil- J
reasonable, in Consideration of the j
inequality existing in the stale with I
the parent country. > ??.
bucli was- the hagis of onr sysftnh, I
as established by the net of 1815, I
and such its ttnfc character. In the ]
eat* in which this net was pfissedj a
treaty tyas cttitclufled wilU Griyti
Britaitf, in strict conMimlfy uithjits
punciples, in regai d lo her' Ktiro
peaii dominions;
however, in tlte West" Indies and
on this continent, it was not extend
ed, the British government claiming
(lie exclusive supply of those colo
nies, and from our own port*, ami
of the productions of the colonies rn
return, in her own vessels. To this
claim the^ij liiinl bt*tes could not
assent, and# in consequence, each
party suspended the intercourse in
the vessels i?f the other, hy a prohi
bition, which still exists. ;
The same conditions weft offered
to trance, hut not accepted. Her
Government has demanded other
conditions, . mote favorable to her
navigation, and \\ hicli should also
$ive extraordinary encouragement to
tier manufacture* and production*, m
the polls of the United States. To
these il wns thought improper to ac
cede* and, iu CoftJttyUeoic, the re
strictive regulations, uiiuli had lieen
adopted on tier pari, lieing counter*
mailed on thr part of the United
states, the Anect commerce, he <?
ween the two countries, in the Ves
af each |)aity# ha* teen m a
-rent moaiiire suspended. It U
much to rrfcrfllt'tl, thai, although u
negotiation has l*en pending,
such is x he diversity of view* enter
tained, oil tin4 various points, which
have been brought into discission,!
that there does not apjK-ar to Ikj any
reasonable prosj>eci of its carl} con
clusion.
It is my duty to Mate, as a cause
of very great regret, that very serious
diflefences have occurred, in this ne
gociation, respecting the construction
of the 8th artic le of the Treaty 4C
1803, whereby Louisiana was ceded
to the United States, and likewise
respecting the seizure of the Apollo,
in 1820, for a violation of our reve
nue laws. The claim of the Gov
ernment t>f France has excited not
less surprise tliau concern, because
there does not appear to he a just
foundation for it in either instance.
By the 8th article of the Treaty re
ferred to, it is stipulated that, after
the expiration of twelve years, dur
ing which it was provided, hy the
preceding or 7th article, tlrat the ves
sels of France and Spain should l?e
admitted into the ports of the ceded
Territory, without paying higher du
ties on merchandize* or tonnage, 4hanj
such as were paid by the citizens of j
the U. States, the ships of France;
should forever afterwards he placed j
011 the focting of the most favored
nations. Bj tfie obvioufc construc-l
Hon of this article, 4H? pie sinned that
it was intended, that no favor should
he granted to any power, in those
ports, to w hich France should not he
forthwith entitled; nor should any.
accommodation be allowed* to an
other power, on conditions, to whipli
she would not, also, he entitled upon
the same conditions. Under this
construction, no favor, or accommo
dation, could he granted, toaoyspow*;
er, to the prejudice of France. >
allowing the equivalent, allowed to
those powers, she wonhjt'. always
stand, in those ports, on the footing
of the most favored nit ion. Rut if
this Article should he so construed, as
that France should enjoy, of right,
and without paying the equivalent*
.all the advantages of such condi-j
tions, as might he allowed to other
powers, in return for important con
cessions made hy them, then the
whole character of the stipulation
would he changed* ?. She. would not
!?e placed on the footing of the most
? favored nation, but on a footing held
hy no Other nation. Hhe would qn
joy all the advantages allowed "to
"them, in consideration of like advan
ces allowed to us, free from eveijy,
and any, condition, whatever.
2 As little cause : has the Goveiin
1 ment of France to complain, of the
seizure of the" Apollo, and the remo
val of other vessels, * from the waters
of thf St. MarvV . "ft will hot W
i 9 ' 1 ? ' 4 l 4 ' 1 ' ' ' ^ ' ' . ' ?
denied, that every nation baa a right
to resume its commercial system, fis
?i* thinks fit. and to Enforce the colletN
tion of i*s revenue, provided it he
dore, without an invasion of the
fighltcof other powers, The violn
lion of its revenue laws is an offence,
which all nation# punish the ptm
ishtnent of w hich, gives no just caifae
of compUhrt, to the |rt>wer to which
^ the offewlers belong# i^wrlKled it he
extended to nil equally'. In ( his
case, every circumstance which oc
f^Kiri e?1, indicated a fixed purjmse to
violate our revenue lawn. Had the
fwirfy intended to have pursued a fair
. rade, he wonld have entered oar
ports, nnd paid the duties; or had be
intended to have carried on a legiti
mate circuitous commerce, with the
United Htates, he would have enter
ed the port of gome other powir.
landed his goods at the custom hoiise
iTCCiWltng hrtatv, and reshipped a|d
sent them In the vessel of s*ich pow
r, or some other power which mi^ht
lawfully hrin$ them, free from.such
duties, to a port in the United States.
But the conduct of the party ill this
case was altogether diflVrent. He
entered the fiver St. Mary's, (he
boundary between the United State*
and Florida, and took his position
on the 8pan??h side, on which, in th<
whole extent of the river, there wa?
no tow n, no port, or custom
atiti scarcely any settlement*
house
Hi*
purpose, thrieiore, was not to
hi* goods Ui (lie inhabitants of Flor
ida, hui lu cilizciM of the U. Stales^
in exchange for (heir ptoductious,
which could nut be done Without a
direct and | ?a I pnble breach of our
Uv\s. It is known that a regular
systematic plan had beeu fornu^ by
certaiu other persons for the'vidiKion
of oor revenue system, which made it
more necessary to check the proceed
ing in its commencement.
Thai the unsettled bank of a river
so remote (rum the Spanish garrisons
aixl populiuinn could give no protec
tion io any party, in wit'h a practice,
is believed to be in strict accord w ith
the law or nations. It vxould uot
have comported with a friendly poli
cy^,to Spain herself, to have_?Htab
llsWd a raston housethere, since it
could have subserved no other pur
pose, than to elude our reveuue laws.
Hut the Gemmuent of Spain did not
adopt that measui$. On ttie contra
ry, it is understood, that tl?e Captain
General of Ciiba, to whom an appli
cation to that effect was made, by {
these adventurers, had not acceded to ]
it. The condition of thuse provinces
for many years before they were ced
ed to the United States, need not,
now , be dwelt on. Inhabited by dif- j
ferent tribes of Indians, ail Inroad Cor '
e very-kind of adventurer, the juris
diction of Spain may be said to have
been, almost exclusively, confined to
her gam^mru It certainly could not
extend to places where she bad no |
authority. The rules therefore, ap
plicable to settled countries, governed
by laws, could not lie deemed so, to
the deserts of Florida, ?nd to tha oc
currences there. It merits ?ttntffiSl |
slso, that the Territory had been
ceded to the Ubited,%fctates,;? by a;
treaty, .the, ratification of which had
not refusal, and which has sine*}
been performed, tinder such cir
cumstances, therefore, Spain became
less responsible for such *acts com
mitted there, and the United States^
more at IHierty tq exercise authority,!
to prevent so great a mischief. The'
conduct of this Cjoverntrient lias, in
every instance, been conciliatory and
friendly to France. The construc
tion of our revenue la*r?. ill its appli
cation to the cases, which have torm
ed the ground of such serious com
pl*kit-on her part* and theordsr, to
the Collector of St. Mary's, in ac
cord with it, were given two years
l>efore these cases occurred, nnd in
reference to a breach* which wits at
tempted by the subject i of another
power. Its application therefore, to
the yises in question, \vn a inevitable.
As soon as the treaty, hy which these
provinces w ere ceded* to the United
States, was ratified, all danger
of further hfyach or oqr teveuuc laws
ceased, au order w*s given fqr jhe
release of tittl vessel, which had
t>een seized, And for the dismission
of the libel, , which, had been if is ti
tqtod ?sa?wtfcln i ? f-'l
The princi pies of this system of
reciprocity, ^ founded (Hi- "the law of
the ?l of^ Match, <#?.
Hiuce enmed into effect . with .the
Kingdom of the Netherlands* Swe
den, Prussia, and with JJamburg,
Bremen, Lubeck, and Oldenburg,
Mtli a provision made by mlin>
quent laws, in regard to theNtither
lands, Prussia, Hamburg, and Bre
men, that such produce and manu
facture, *as could only be, or most
usually were, first snipped from the
Kris of these, countries, the same
lug inn Kir ted *D vessels, wholly
belonging to tlieir subjects, should
be considered and admitted is their
own manufacture* and productions.
Th? government of Norway lias,
by an ordinance, opened the ports
of that part of the dominions of the
King of Sweden, to the vessels of
l tie United States, upon the. |iay
ment of no other or higlier duties,
han me paid hy the Norwegian ves
wis, from whatever place arriving,
tnd with whatever articles laden.
I hev have requested the reciprocal
allowance for tlie vessels of Nor-' I
way in Ihe ports of the United,
?Mates. As this previlcge is not
viUiitr the scope e I lie a< t of the
, id of March, 181;% and I can only
i oc prattled hy i'ougress; and as it
way involve the commercial relations
of th* U ition with olUct .t*n?s
the subject is submitted lu the >s u
dom of Congrvss.
1 have presented thus fully to your
view our commercial rtl.it ion* \%ith
Imbiber powers, that, teeing them in
| detail with each power, and know
ing&lMjptiasis on which they rent,
Congress may in its wisdom dei ide,
whether any change ought to he
?arte, and, if any, in what respect.
If this basis h unjust or unreasouu*
hie, surely it ought to l>e abandon*
ed ; hut if it be just and reasonable,
and any change in it w ill make n il
cessions subversive of the principles
of equality,, aud tending in its con*
^sequences to sap the foundations of
I our prosperity, then the reasons am
equally strong, for adhering to the
pound already taken, and support
ing it by such further regulations as
may appear to he proper, should
any additional support hi fouud ne?
cessary. - *
The ? question concerning the awfi
struction of tike Arst article of the
treaty of Ghent, has been, b\ a
joint act of the Representatives of
the United b tales, and of (it eat
Britain, at the court of St. Peters
burg, submitted to the decision of
his Imperial Majesty, the Emperor
of Hussia? The result of that sub*
mission has ^not yet received,
j The Commissioners under the 5tli
article oL the treaty ndt^having ln en
able to agree upon tlieir decision,
their reports to tka two Governments,
coutoraiably to the provisions of the
treaty, may be expected at an early
thetrefctyof Febru
ary ??d, 1810, has beeq partly <**?
rie*- into execution. Possession of
East aud West Warty* Jim teen
given to the United States, lint the
officers charged with ihnt service. I>y
an order from bis CatltoUe .Vlpjesty,
delivered, by his Alinisie*,tathe S?.
cretury of tetate, and tr(Hi?wiitt'(V liy
.?special agent to. the Captiao Gene
ral of Cuba, , to whom it was direct*
ed, and iajgtaa the gov???mw?t of
L those provinces was .vested, b?V?
I not only. emitted, in contravention of
the orders of , tlieir sovereign, tho
performance of the express stipula
tion, to deliver over the archives and
?l i_ < ? ?- - * *
^ all of * which M wn expected would
when the troop* were withdrawn, bat
defeated, aince* every effort of -the
United States lo obtain them, espe
cially those ot the greatest imj
ance. This omission Iim given
toaeveral ^inckleitt* of a painful oat
tore, the ' character of which will (na
fuWy disclosed, by*' the dorcmetjjfc
which will hereafter be eommuuicat
i i/
m
?PT,
m
in every other circumstance 'tM
law of the 3d of March lawt, fr>r
carrying into eff.ct that treaty Jian
hecn ilnly attended to. AW the ex*
ecotif rr of that part Which pro-sen rd
in force, for the government ?fj tfc4
inhabitants, fbr the'ltertW' Rifled,
all the civil, mithary,' and judicial
(towers, exitoise'd hy the existing
government of those provinces, nil
adequate nnmlier of olncers, as was
presumed, wen appointed* and' be
itered to their rttjtetfKd station*. -
Both provinces wei*e formCt} into onO
territory, and a governor appointed
for it, hut, in consideration of ilia
pie-existing division, and of the dis
tance and difficulty of communication,
between Pensacols, the residence of
the Glovetrnof of West lTlorida, and
8t. Augustine, that of the Governor
< the considerallie population of each*
?province was print ? pa I J celleckd,
| iwi? ftectetarie* were af^ioiuled, one
b Made at Pensacota, and tfe? o bcr ,
at 81. A ugutuine. Due attention wa?
i likewise paid to the execution of the
laws of the United &tatcft renting lo
the revenue, and the slave trade,
which were extended to thfefte pro?
vitices. The whole territory wat
divided into three collection di?t?icta,
thai part lying between tlie river 8u
Mary's and Cape Florida, forming -
one, thai from the Cape |o (lie Api?
lachicolsp another, and that frwn this