The Lancaster news. (Lancaster, S.C.) 1905-current, July 22, 1913, Page 8, Image 8

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

1 8 FARMERS AND THE TARIFF i REVISION IS IN Til Kilt FAVOR, i i1 Senator Simmons Says New llill is , a Satisfactory Answer to 1 tell mud for Downward Revision. "Washington, July 20.?Debate on j the tariff in the senate began in earnest yesterday with Chairman Simmons of the finance committee, pro- j claiming the new bill a satisfactory nnowor to thp dpnin ml for down Wftfd revision, and Senator Cumtnins, | speaking from a Progressive-Republican standpoint, predicting that it would carry the Democratic party to defeat. Senator Simmons replied to con- 1 tentlons that the bill discriminated against the farmer. Senator Cummins asserted that the Democratic : party had treated the farmer as an outlaw and vigorously assailed Pres- J ident Wilson for his participation in framing the bill. This he characterized as abuse of power that had been "coercive " Senator Simmons recounted the farm products the mesage would place on the free list, such as wheat, (lour, cattle, sheep, swine, sugar, wool, eggs and potatoes, and said: "Every man, whatever his occupation, will be the beneficiary in some direction, to a greater o; less degree, of this general system of reductions. In this respect the farmer has been shown special consideration. Practically everything he buys has been put on the free list or the duties have been greatly reduced. TO BENEFIT FARMERS. "For his special benefit cotton bagKing and tics and materials out of which sacks for grain, wool, fertilizer, etc., are made, wire for fencing and baling purposes, and similar articles of farm consumption, have been put on the free list. For his special benefit ploughs, shovels, hoes, rakes, mowers, reapers, planters and agricultural implements of overy , kind and description have been put ' upon the free list. He will be, in a large degree, the beneficiary of free listing of building materials of various kinds, materials used in con- 1 structlon of roads, school text books, i boots and shoes, low grade blankets, harness, saddles, wagons, carts, sewing machines and other like products. "He will share general benefits from the reduction of duty on sugar and Its ultimate abolition, and finally he will share benefits of the heavy reductions this bill makes on wearing apparel of every description, crockery, hardware, hardwood and kitchen furnishings and utensils." Chairman Simmons declared the free list under the present PayneAldrich law was In the Interest of the protected manufacturers. A Woman Wan The Home I | MAKE HER HAPPY BY TAI IT THE YEAR F raKe a about c 1st? B Heads, MAIN STRE1 = ; I IN INTEREST OF CONSUMERS. Jw "The free list in the bill is a free " list in the interest of the consumer r as well as for the manufacturer," said he. "Undoubtedly there will be in creased Importations under mis diii. That was intended and provided for s in the reductions in rates it makes, j You cannot revise the tariff so as to give relief from present tariff bur- o dens, except by enlarging opportu- p nities for importations. v "Undoubtedly, on the other hand t there will be increased exportations a under this bill. That was also in- c tended by its framers and is provid- c ed for in such ways as was found u possible and practicable. e "To this end it untaxes the things n the farmer employes in making the i products he sells abroad. It untaxes i the raw materials of the manufac- g turer. t "In short, it seeks in such ways as are open to establish upon a broader t basis that spirit of comity on which ti international good will rest, to re- n move hampering restrictions, to r broaden the basis of international v trade and enable the American pro- t ducer to take advantage, in greater v measure than has been possible un- v der existing conditions, 01 our givm v national opportunity in the market s places of the world." 8 HOW DEMOCRATS WON. "In the national campaign of 1912," said Chairman Simmons, "the _ Republican party nominated Mr. Taft j, for President and the Democratic ' party nominated Mr. Wilson. In that campaign the tarlif and the record of the two parties as exemplified by j their action in Congress with refer- j. ence to these schedule bills, and of ; President Taft in his veto of them s became the paramount issue. Out j of the 631 votes in the Electorlal j. College President Taft received only 8, and Mr. Wilson received 43 5. The * Republican party in the senate was superseded by a Democratic majority of six, while the Democratic majority in the house was increased from 68 ! to 146. "The bill now presented to the s senate, it is confidently believed, is a t fair Interpretation of the will of the r people and is an honest compliance i with the pledges of the Democratic t party with respect to the revision of 1 the tariff. The conditions under c which the schedule bills of 1011 and c 1909 were drawn and submittted to g Congress were radically different in \ many respects from those which now . obtain. These schedule bills were submitted as individual pieces of leg- r islation and only as a part of a gen- 1 eral system of customs taxation, r Moreover, at that time, on account of f constitutional limitations upon the t power of Congress with respect to 1 taxing incomes, revenue from this s source except from Incomes of cor- i porations, was not available. The 1 extension of the power of Congress i with respect to taxing Incomes, as < T 'apcr I \ UNG tO'iND Eight look and >ut. Have [ow about Receipts, ST 1 THE LANCASTER NEV ell as the enlargement of the scope tl f the proposed revision, has made it n ossible under this bill to make fur- Ij her reductions in the rates In the t< resent law than was possible under a he conditions under which these ii chedule bills were framed and preented. v UNTAX LIKE S NECESSITIES. A "I wish to say that amendments ffered by the committee are not proosed in a spirit of disagreement 1 rith the house, or to its theory of ariff revision. On the contraiw. they s re ofTered with a view of further J arrying out and perfecting the prin- J' iples of a revenue producing tariff " ipon the basis of competitive rates " nunciated by the house ways and " [leans committee as a just and fair ? nterpretation in the light of existng conditions of the platform pled- " ;es of the Democratic party upon ^ ariff. | "Like the house, we have sought * o find a basis of action which would intax the necessaries of life as far t s is consistent with the revenue g leeds of the government, wnicn > vould lay the heaviest burdens upon d he luxuries of the rich, and which f rould Impose upon those things e ^hich were neither prime necessities d >r luxuries and which were proper ? ubjeets of tariff taxation, a rate ufticiently competitive to yield reve- e iites adequate to meet the needs of d he government on the one hand and u in the other operate as a regulation v if domestic prices, by making out- t ide competition at all times poslble." d Senator Simmons analyzed the va- s ious changes in the schedules at t ength. The metal schedule in the a louse bill carried an average ad- ] ance of 21.22 per cent, which the E enate reduced to 18.38 per cent, ron ore, he said, was placed on the i ree list in the house bill to aid inde- a ?endent producers of iron and steel, j md for like reasons the senate com- d nittee free-listed ferromanganese s nd pig iron. THE WOOL. SCHEDULE. a Of the wool schedule, in which the p enate committee retain raw wool on \ he free list and cut rates on manu- t actures, Senator Simmons said: t "For more than a third of a cen- t ury the dutieB on wool and wool- e ens have remained practically un- 1 hanged. That these duties are not f inly excessive, but indefensible, is y :enerally admitted, even by the advocates of protection." "No class of our people has reap- t >d as little benefit from the re- ( mblic's tariff system and suffered as i leavy irom us fxacuuns as nin uir- i ner. No class of our people under- I itand the practical operation of our ariff better than the farmer. He ! inowB that under the Republican lystem he has had to buy in a highly | >rotected market and sell most of 1 lis products on a basis of free com>etltion with the world. The studied ?fforts to mislead him. with respect to lie La ?L Pages and C see if yoi 3 you pier your Lett Etc.? L< 1 HE I rs, JULY 22, 1913. ie effect of this bill upon him will ) ot succeed. He will study It close- i r, us Is now his custom with respect i > ull questions affecting his Interests t nd the common welfare. There Is f 1 my mind no doubt that hlB verdict i 'ill be one of approval, especially in t lew of the fact he will be among the rst to feel the beneficent results of 1 he transition from a tariff in the In- l prests of the classes to a tariff in the < :iterest of the masses." i " -? - WILSON INFLUENCE COERCIVE. Besides pointing out many things hat he considered destructive and | ;ntlrely unwarranted in the bill, Senltor Cummings criticised the Presi- 1 lent for his influence exerted upon nembers of Congress concerning the tariff bill, an influence, he said, "so persistent and determined that it be- 1 ame coercive." "I do not charge, nor do I be- j lieve," said Senator Cummins, "that the President, in terms barters this power for legislative subordination, 1 but I do say that without barter the incastei 50 a "V ^ I * T^?*TT ' uiiics xi/vciy ir Printe< lty Bill ? er neaas, Bt us have NEW' c v f ^ f5M{ /, The income section of the hill, < enator Simmons said, was not fram- 1 d upon the theory that the chief ob- < ect of an income tax was to supply 1 eficit in revenue, "but it is based 1 ipon the theory that property should 1 ear its just share of federal as well ] s state taxation, and that, there- , ore, the rate of this tax should be xed with a view to requiring the wealth of the country, as reflected in he income of the well to do to con- 1 ribute equitably to these expenses. Senator Cummins, opening the ariflf debate yesterday for the T'roxessive 'Republicans, declared thnt he Republican party lost the conflence of the people and "was driven rom power largely because it insistj * i- - (jmmama ii upon nit* lUUiiiifiimii c wi iiiijiui i luties. many of which were unnecesarily an 1 oppressively high." "The Democratic pnriy," he assertd, "will soon be overtaken with like lisaster because it is about to inflict ipon the country a tariff law which, kith respect in many thinRs, invites )]< perils o? free trade, and which, vith respect to many others. Imposes luties that are dangerously and detructively low. and which, from end o end. Rrievously discriminates iRainst the West in favor of the Cast, that is to say in favor of the nanufacturers against the farmer. "The Republican craft went down n the whirlpool of Seylia in 11112 md its Democratic successor is steeriiR straight for the rocks of Charvblis, where it will go to pieces in the tress of 1916. "There is a passageway to safety tnd prosperity. The Progressive Remblicans charted it in 19 09 and they trill charter it again in 1918. Some ime the 'American people will make he trip under these pilots, but. in he meantime we must suffer another ihipwreck, bearing its hardships, as hope we will, with patriotism and nrfitiulo M V \ cnowledge of the consequences that nay follow legislative Independence ; vlll bring about all the evils of ac- 5 ual wrong-doing, unless the most icrupulous care Is. exercised In com-4 * nunications between the President " md members of Congress." Senator Cummins declared he be- 8U' ieved the bill would be modified If "J* members of Congress voted their of :onviotlons, but that it would not be modified, "largely because the Presilent of the United States, assuming Lo interpret and apply the economic e loctrlne of his party, has laid the P3* heavy hand of his power upon a branch of the government that ought jV1 to lie co-ordinate, but wnicti, in iact, liave become subordinate." ba TARIFF FOR REVENUE OHSO- sh I,ETE. | Tariff for revenut, Senntor Cum- da mlns said, he regarded was obsolete, unjust and Intolerable, and that "the moment protection becomes unneces- ? sary. free trade is demanded by every i consideration of justice and equality." "I would hold myself an enemy of mankind," the senator continued, "if : through import duties, 1 were to p. raise the priee of any commodity which the people generally use, and 8U ought to use. simply to put money a(j into the treasury of the United States. "We produced in the United States a(j commodities competitive in their re character, and upon which duties are ce i new rear 4 Tuesday and ] 1 Station?] leads for j i rjiiveiupc 3 your ord* R LANC 1 ^}k&auKI., 1 mu' v levied in this bill, of the value of not f0 less than $18,800,000,000. If the average rate of duty upon these c, things is 25 per cent and that. I be- pt] lieve. is ?he estimate of the promot- th ters of the bill, the duties will in- th crease the price of one year's pro- ti< duct, in the aggregate, $4,700,000.000. If those who consume, as well da as those who produce, 'hese commo- i dities, share the benefits of the in- I creased price, the general good will he promoted, but if our Democratic I ~~ friends are right in asserting that i those who produce the dutiable articles are the only beneficiaries, they' ought to shudder when they contem- gj( plate what they are doing, for they ^ are not only taxing the people upon their consumption, the $250,000,000 Ar which arc collected at the custom gr houses on Imports, but they are taxink them the $4,700,000,000 for the p, sole benefit of the domestic produc- BC ers of these commodities, and It will , shock the country when It is fairly flfl appreciated." e] The senator submitted figures de- ' a( signed to show that, according to the e] Democratic view, prices are raised by re the pending bill upon 60 per cent of tt the enormous production east of the c? Mississippi river, while it raises the gl prices of but 39 per cent of th^ | lesser production west of the river. p< The senator declarod the Demo? el crats had treated the farmer as an outlaw in making up the bill; that many of the products of the farmers were entitled to protection. V Naiu CITATION. 3TATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, . . . County of Lancaster y J. E. Stewman, Probate Judge. Wheras, J. P. Allison has made It to me to grant him letters of adnlstratlon of the estate and effects Edward C. Allison. These are, therefore, to cite and monlsh all and singular the kind1 and creditors of the said deceas, that they be and appear before >, In the Court of Probate, to be Id at Lancaster court house, S. C., July 30th, 1913, next, after pubation hereof, at 11 o'clock In the renoon, to show cause, If any they ve, why the said administration ould not be granted. Given under my hand this 15th y of July Anno Domini 1913. J. E. STEWMAN, Probate Judgo. CITATION. VflJ, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. County of Lancaster. r J. E. Stewman, Probate Judge. Whereas, Ben Morgan has made it to me to grant him letters of ministration of the estate and efrts of D. T. Hough. These are. therefore, to cite and monlsh all and singular the kindd and creditors of the said deased, that they be and appear here me, in the court of probate, to nein at i^ancaster court nouse, B. , on 25th July 1913, next, after ibllcatlon hereof, at 11 o'clock In e forenoon, to show cause, if any ey have, why the said admlnlstra>n should not be granted. Given under my hand this 11th iy of July, Anno Domini 1913. J. E. STEWMAN, Probate Judge. Notice of Election. Wheras, one-third of the electors id one-third of the free-holders reding In Osceola school district. No. Lancaster county, have petitioned e county board of education to or>r an election to determine whether not an additional 2-mtll levy shall ! placed on all real and personal operty In said school district for hool purposes. We hereby order the trustees of ild school district No. 4, to hold the ectlon on Thursday, July 31, 1913, . , ; Osceola school house, at which ^4 J ectlon only such electors as return :oi UI irariHiuiu yroperiy lor UU Eton and who exhibit their tax r?>lpts and registration certificate* mil be allowed to rote. Rules for opening and closing of jlls to be same as In all general ectlons. V. A. LINGLB, J. K. CONNOR8, J. O. RICHARDS, County Board of Education. s t 1 ri F riday ry isn't August s9 Note 3r now. ;aster, s. c. I I