The clothmaker. [volume] (Clinton, South Carolina) 1952-1984, October 15, 1990, Image 10
Blueprints for Industry
Committed To Memory
Vote As You Please
BUT VOTE!
Tuesday, Nov. 6 is election day.
You have a lot to lose if you don’t
vote. By failure to vote you will not
be able to express yourself on—for
instance—schools, law enforcement,
etc., candidates and the issues they
stand for. You will be letting those
who DO VOTE decide these impor
tant matters for you.
The right to vote is a priceless
heritage of a free people. It is your
ticket to continued freedom and the
kind of government, local and na
tional, that you want.
Maybe you think your vote won’t
matter in the final results. But you’re
wrong. Your vote could decide an
election.
The winner of many a statewide
contest has been decided by a dif
ference of one vote per precinct—or
less.
Historically, one vote had a lot to do
with things in the U.S.:
Thomas Jefferson was elected by a
single vote in the electoral college as
was John Quincy Adams.
Just one vote elected California,
Idaho, Oregon, Washington and Texas
to statehood.
The Draft Act of World War II pass
ed the House by one vote.
So don’t throw away the vote you’re
entitled to cast in election. It may
elect your candidate to office.
Intelligent voting is a basic act of
good citizenship. Be a responsible
citizen. Make up your mind. Vote as
you please—BUT VOTE!
Textile Industry Hurt
From Imports
The U.S. textile industry celebrates
its bicentennial this year, noting a long
record of economic and social contribu
tions to this country.
In 1790, the United States was a
young nation, still struggling to become
an established country. But that was
soon to change with the birth of the U.S.
textile industry and the start of
manufacturing.
An English textile mechanic named
Samuel Slater had a great influence on
the beginning of industrial progress
United States. He arrived in America
200 years ago this year, having been
trained in the production methods of
Richard Arkwright. Arkwright was
responsible in 1771 for producing the
first all-cotton fabric in England.
Competition in textiles was so intense
at that time that skilled workers in the
industry were not allowed to leave
England. Slater left anyway, taking in
his memory the details of textile
machinery and methods for spinning
cotton into yarn for weaving.
Moses Brown, owner and manager of
serval manufacturing and trading
enterprises, hired Slater in hopes of
making a success of machanized yarn
production. Slater started his opera
tions on the Blackstone River in Rhode
Island, building the first U.S. spinning
factory, which earned him the title of
the father of American manufacturing.
In December 1790, a work force of
nine employees began spinning cotton
with Slater’s machinery. Three years
later, the Slater Mill was built and
became the first English-type cotton
spinning mill on this continent.
A series of inventions helped to ad
vance the U.S. textile manufacturing
industry even further. In 1793, Eli
Whitney perfected the cotton gin, which
cleaned as much cotton each day as it
had taken 50 people to do in the past.
Francis C. Lowell of Boston visited
England in 1811 and observed the
power-loom industry. Two years later
in Massachusetts, he began manufac
turing cotton goods by power looms for
the first time in America. His mill
became the first in which all
operations—from cotton bale to finish
ed cloth—were not only mechanized
but carried out under one roof.
Textile manufacturing had become a
large-scale industry.
Cotton good companies began to
spring up in this country. Ring spinn
ing, the first great American invention
in the textile industry, was perfected in
1828 by James Thorpe.
In 1846 Isaac Singer designed a sew
ing machine more sophisticated than
earlier models. His machine, when
mass produced, led to the textile in
dustry’s biggest offspring, the apparel
industry.
By 1847 more people in the United
States worked in textile plants than any
other industry.
The first synthetic dye entered the
picture in 1856, when it was accidental
ly discovered in a solution of coal tar.
Before that time, fabric dyes had been
obtained from such sources as
shellfish, insects, plants and wood. To
day more than 1,500 dyes are produc
ed in the United States.
By the 1870s, textile manufacturing
began to become established in the
South and continued to gain strength
there.
The first rayon plant opened in the
United States in 1910, signaling the
(See BLUEPRINTS, page 11)
The U.S. textile industry, one of the
largest manufacturing industries in the
country, is being hurt by growing
volumes of textile and apparel imports.
As imports have increased, the market
share for the U.S. industry continues to
decrease, which translates into a loss
of jobs for people in this country.
Consider several alarming trends.
Textile and apparel imports have been
growing at a rate of almost 12 percent
a year for the last decade. During that
time, however, the U.S. market for tex
tile and apparel goods has increased by
only 1 percent a year.
More than 400,000 works in the U.S.
textile complex have lost their jobs in
the last 10 years because of rising im
ports. Within the last 12 months, the in
dustry has lost more than 70,000 jobs.
The U.S. textile industry lost $47
million in the first quarter of 1990 as 89
textile and apparel plants closed their
doors this year.
In the first half of this years, the tex
tile and apparel trade deficit was at a
record level—accounting for 27.7 per
cent of the total U.S. merchandise trade
deficit for that period.
U.S. textile companies are not only
competing with low wages paid by
overseas producers but with subsidies
by foreign governments, protection of
foreign markets, fewer environmental
and safety and health regulations for
foreign workers, and manufacturing
under conditions that would be illegal
in the United States.
All Americans have a vested interest
in seeing that the U.S. textile industry
survives. Manufacturing jobs provide
the foundation of the U.S. standard of
living. More than two million people
work in the U.S. textile, apparel and
fiber industrial complex, which
generates about $50 billion in gross na
tional product annually.
A domestic textile industry is vital
for a strong national defense. The U.S.
Defense Department, which has some
10,000 textile items in its inventory,
ranks textiles second only to steel in
importance to the national defense.
The textile industry is the best and
most reliable customer for U.S.—grown
cotton and consumes virtually all of the
U.S. wool clip.
The industry employee more women
and minorities than other manufactur
ing industries. Unlike textile industries
in numerous foreign nations, the U.S.
industry supports education at all
levels as well as employee safety and
protection of the environment.
The U.S. government must take on
the challenge of effectively addressing
the import problem. The employees of
the domestic industry and the nation as
a whole deserve no less.
U.S. TEXTILE AND APPAREL TRADE
C.I.F. Import Values, F.A.S. Export Values
Calendar Year Totals
Millions of Dollars
36,000
IMPORTS
32,000
28,000
24,000
20,000
DEFICIT
16,000
12,000
4,000 -
EXPORTS
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90*
* Annualized based on the first six months of the year.
page 10 - Cloth Maker