The clothmaker. [volume] (Clinton, South Carolina) 1952-1984, February 15, 1959, Page 2, Image 3
2
<?MSftr?SS CLd
.t, i Published
irC r~3l for empl
I and Lyd
J Clinton, !
1 " direction
Crocker.
Member of South
Atlantic Council of Xior
Industrial Killtnrs
Calwin Cnnr>o?
E. C. Huffstetler
The publishers of 1
items of interest fro
to your departn
per;
GREENVILI
Serving The Ti
Pride in
Those who examine Ai
whether our people, gem
pride in achievement.
As a nation we continu
resourcefulness, technical r
good many places that as
little interest in, or respec
Dr. James R. Killian, P
adviser, took note of this m
cans need to develop a higl
pride in achievement.
What counts, he said, i:
to the "factor of excellenc
Disquieting signs exist
enough about excelling in
ning a business, making a
in a store, holding down a
There are at least a cov
One is how we as indiv
to do what we may vaguel
clear standards of excelleni
necessary to succeed by tl
plishment is indeed sadly
The game of getting th
month, of drawing pay for
us all at times. But nothin
that way.
The day that becomes
of life, the Russians can lie
The second thing is ho1
Do we respect them for tl
downgrade and belittle tl
because they are ''not like
If we should ever n
that to be superior in any <
ing of scorn and ridicule,
tents. For this world will
More than ever, the rac?
had better be swift, but if
better learn to think well c
?Reprinted with
Piedmont (issue
Re
Many customers are dei
service. But they're also d
formance. Thev expect us
You only buy products
That's the way our custom
Just What i.
It has nothing to do wi
is a way of living in which
Little things make up this
would lose if you ever sun
i ilt r.i it_Tpn.se is inc ri
store or buy a farm, if y<
change your job if you dor
Free Enterprise is the r
Free Enterprise is the r
blow it on a good time if 1
Free Enterpi ise is look
protect you, on a judge as ;
Free Enterprise is the i
think best.
Free Enterprise is the r
you wish.
Free Enterprise has not
you have or don't have, nr
Enterprise means the right
is the sum of many little th
if someone stole it from y<
monthly by and __
oyees of Clinton /
ia Cotton Mills, L
S. C., under the
of Claude A. Sj
Industrial Rela- w .
,e Dirpptnr Member of American
IS Uirector. Association of
Industrial Editors
Editor
Staff Artist
'he Clothmaker will welcome
?m its readers. Turn them in
lental reporters or to the
;onnel office.
_E PIEDMONT
Center of the World
Achievement
merican life closely today wonder
?rally speaking, take a sufficient
e to get high marks for ingenuity,
nastery. Yet there is evidence in a
individuals some Americans show
t for. solid accomplishment,
resident Eisenhower's top scientific
latter recently when he said Amerihier
regard for learning and a fuller
5 the importance Americans attach
e" in our society.
that a lot of us don't worrv nparlv
the things we do, whether it's runproduct.
trying a law suit, clerking
government job. or keeping house,
jple of things involved in this,
iduals feel about trying not simply
y define as "our best," but to meet
ce. If we do not think it is good or
hat test, then our pride of accomlimited.
trough the day, the week, and the
routine effort, is one that may lure
g great was ever built or sustained
the American's general philosophy
k us without firing a shot,
w we look upon others who excel,
leir attainments? Or do we try to
tern, to treat them with suspicion
us"?
neonle. serionslv pntoHam
endeavor is to bo odd, to be deservthen
we might as well fold up our
prove too tough for us.
? today is to the swift. We not only
we wish to gain that end we had
>f those among us who already are.
special permission from the Greenville
of Jan. 12, 1959).
liability
manding not only good quality and
emanding reliable, every lime perto
be consistent.
on which you depend every time,
lers buy.
s Free Enterprise
th politics nor wealth nor class It
vou as an individual are important.
,.f i ?--- ?
wi living, uui ininK wnat you
'endered it:
ght to open a gas station or grocery
ou want to be your own boss, or
ft like the man you work for.
ight to lock your door at night,
ight to save money if you want, or
that's what you prefer,
ing on a policeman as someone to
n friend to help you.
ight to raise your children as you
ight to speak freely about anything
hing to do with how much money
>r what your job is or is not. Free
to be YOURSELF. Free Enterprise
ings ? but how miserable you'd be
3U.
THE CLOTHMAKER
THE S A '
THE Cl'RTIS PIT H 1. I S II 1 N O COK
AMERIC/
(Reprinted by special permission
of THE SATURDAY
EVENING POST, Copyright
1958 by The Curtis Publishing
\
V^V/M C pU U If . )
Most Americans respond favorably
to the general purpose
behind the Administration's
effort to expand international
trade. However
when you get down to cases
and understand how the reciprocal-trade
program works
in specific instances, approval
is considerably short of unanimous.
The plight of the textile-manufacturing
industry
which involves an investment
of $8,000,000,000 and provides
employment for more than a
million workers and $4,000,000,000
investment in the apparel
industry, is a case in
point. The threat to the cotton-textile
industry is a weird
combination of obstacles before
which any American industry
might quail.
First, thp lovtilo mnnnfn^
turer who uses cotton yarn
must buy his raw cotton at
the price fixed under the
agricultural-support program.
In the meantime the Government,
stuck with cotton which
it has accumulated at the support
price, sells it in the world
market, where the price is
about 20 per cent under the
American "kept" price. Thus
the manufacturer in Japan,
Italy or Indonesia is able to
buy his major raw material
for 20 per cent less than his
American competitor has to
pay.
Whv, it may be asked,
doesn't the American manufacturer
go into the world
market for his cotton? The
cotton Farmer's lobby and its
political henchmen have taken
care of this possible loop-hole
by placing an import quota on
High Impc
This chart shows two reasons
for the unemployment
problems within the U. S. textile
industry. The chart indicates
clearly that there has
been a decrease in exports ol
textiles produced in this country
and an increase in imports
of goods made in low-wage
foreign countries. In 1948. U
kj. cApwi is *?i icAiiit's amounicd
to about 800 million dollars.
Imports in 1948 were
worth about 800 million dollars.
In 1957 we exported only
498.8 million dollars worth oi
textiles while importing 486.fi
million dollars worth. Current
information on 1958 exports
shows that a further
decrease in U. S. exports of
textiles is in prospect, with
shipments of cotton goods
more than 84 million square
yards behind 1957. In 1948
when exports were high and
imports were low. tin? textile
industry emplyoed 1.868.00(1
persons. Latest information
shows that employment in the
TURDAY EVEN I
IPANY ^111111^^^8^^
i'S TEXTILE II
raw cotton. Although most
raw-cotton imports arc prohibited
bv the quota, the prcr
sent duty on cloth dresses,
shirts and underpants made
from our exported cotton does
not close the gap between the
world price and the higher
American legislated price.
Anotlior mainr <r? llm
; textile industry is the difference
between American high
; wages, to a large extent com[
pulsory under various laws
and regulations, and the low
wages prevailing in competing
areas, especially Japan
and Hong Kong, The classical
; free-trade position?advanced
i bv supporters of the General
Agreement on Tariff and
Trade?is that consumers arc
i entitled to the benefits of
low costs in other countries
I and that, if the American producer
cannot meet the competition,
he ought to go into
some other trade. But, argue
the American producers, even
i if it were desirable to junk
the American standard of living
in order to boost standards
_! ?? ? * - " "
oi living cisewnere, it couldn't
be done without the repeal
of minimum-wage and maximum-hours
and other protections
which the American
; worker now enjoys.
Furthermore, the U. S. Tex;
tile man points out. our International
Co-operation Adi
ministration and other distributors
of foreign aid have
i made the lot of our foreign
competitors even easier by
helping to equip them with
brand-new plants and the latest
machinery to go with
1 them. Modernization of the
American industry, while im;
pressive. has been hampered
i bv inadequate depreciation
allowances,
i As of now. imports of all
)rts Equal Low Ei
U. S. Imports and Exports of F
Manufacture
Million Qollars
eoop
"! 111
4??- | |^(i
^ H 'sports ^
JImI
1348 49 50 51 52
i
I industry has dropped to 951,i
000 in 1958, a year of lower
exports and higher imports.
FEBRUARY. 1959
N G POST
RUS II. K. CURTIS. Pmidrnt, IKS3-19.12
MDUSTRY
textiles are but a small fraction
of the total textile production
in this country. Furthermore,
the American industry
exports more textiles
than it imports. However, the
manufacturer of one category
of textiles, ginghams or velveteens
for example, heavily
hit by lowcost imports, does
noi oeneiu because the manufacturer
of another variety,
like industrial webbing, is unscathed.
The ratio of textile
imports to exports is far less
in favor of exports than it
once was, for the obvious reason
that our foreign customers
are being taken from us
by competitors blessed with
the advantages already mentioned.
Obviously we cannot build
a nonscalable tariff wall
around the textile industry.
However, it does not seem
unreasonable to suggest a
compensating import duty on
goods made from the cotton
which we supply to foreign
processors at a 20-per-cent
discount. After all. American
flour mills are protected
against imports of flour made
from wheat sold abroad for
less than the support price. A
little less enthusiasm for set
ting up still more textile
industries abroad with American
money would also contribute.
There would still remain
the wide difference between
American and Asiatic wages
in the affected industries.
Probably there is no cure for
this except an enforceable
quota which should be liberal
enough to give the Japanese
and foreign industry generally
a reasonable share of the
market, but drastic enough to
prevent disaster to the domestic
industry.
mplovment
m m
abrics, Apparel and Related
s, 1948-1957
Pereer*
Imports
e*Por, os PCfc?nt
53 54 55 6 6 6/
Thus, American textile jobs
are threatened bv continued
high imports of textile goods.