The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 05, 2006, Page 10, Image 10
Page 10 Wednesday, April5, 2006
i _
AMECOCK
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor ;
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Assistant News Editor
JACKIE ALEXANDER
The Mix Editor \
ALEXjS ARNONE
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Sports Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Assistant Viewpoints Editor
AARON BRAZIER
IN OUR OPINION
Cutting patriotic garb
shows grade-A idiocy
Fashions come and go, but supporting your country
in dicey times is never out of style. Too bad that
wearing patriotic clothes at one Colorado school is so
five minutes ago.
The principal at Shaw Heights Middle School
informed parents last week that students could no
longer wear patriotic clothing, including camouflage
pants, on school grounds over fear that tensions
related to the ongoing immigration snafu would
spark violence, according to a CBS Denver TV report
detailed online.
rslext up on the bhaw
Heights curriculum: How
to be a Wuss 101.
An attempt to block
kids from wearing the
colors of any country —
be it the U.S., Mexico or
other sovereign nations
— is a fatal free-speech
1 tit XT4- nnlir aI- a
k/ivy T T • i ^ k k/iik * kliu kj kltv
school is teaching fresh young minds that backing off
in the face of possible confrontation is respectable.
Spinelessness earns an A+, cowering in the corner a
pat on the back.
Patriotism in any color should not be silenced —
especially when pandering pundits find that rolling
over like a stooge is a much more agreeable reaction
to a threat than action itself. The immigration debate
concerning the rights of illegal immigrants could
drag on indefinitely, and displaying one’s flag is every
citizen’s Constitutional fashion statement.
School safety is — and always should be — a
paramount concern to parents and educators, and
two kids scrapping in the cafeteria over foreign policy
makes milk money woes sound mundane. No one
wants American and Mexican kids crushing each other
into pulp — especially when, for better or worse, our
countries will forever be intertwined.
But taking a risk is inherent in the First Amendment.
It will often be dangerous to freely speak your mind.
How it has become dangerous to tote an American flag in
an American school is a disturbing rhetorical question.
Displaying
one’s flag is
every citizen’s
Constitutional
fashion statement.
IT’S YOUR RIGHT
Voice your opinion on message
boards at wuw.dailygamecock.com
or send letters to the editor at
gamecockopinionsQl>gwm.sc. edu
CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know
about it. E-mail us at gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
i-1
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
AARON KIDD
News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Assistant News Editor
JACKIE ALEXANDER
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Assistant Viewpoints Editor
AARON BRAZIER
Uje Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Assistant Mix Editor
KRISTEN TRUESDALE
Sports Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Assistant Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Assistant Photo Editor
KATY BLALOCK
ROSE GREENE
Page Designers
MIKE CONWAY, KATE
FENWICK, MEGAN SINCLAIR
StaffWriters
AJ. BEMBRY, TOM
BENNING, JESS DAVIS,
TIM MCMANUS, MARJORIE
RIDDLE, GINA VASSELLI
Copy Editors
CAROLINE DESANCTIS,
BETHANY NICHOLS,
ELIZABETH PARHAM,
JAMISON TINSLEY, KRYSTAL
WEBBER, LIZ WHITE
(
UUNIAUI INrUKMAIIUN
Offices located on the thirdfloor of the Russell House
Editor’s office hours are from 2-3 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays
Editor: gamecockeditor@gum.sc.edu
News: gamecocknews@gum.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm. sc. edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gum.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@gum.sc.edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPR@yahoo.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726 ; Sports: 777-7182
Editor’s Office: 777-3914
Fax: 777-6482
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
SCOTT LINDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COLLINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
Adi. :ng Manager
SARAH SCARBOROUGH
Classifieds Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
C. NEIL scon
Advertising
APRYL ALEXANDER,
KATIE CUPPIA, BREANNA
EVANS, MARY RACHEL
FREEMAN, DEIDRE
merrick, McKenzie
WELSH
Creative Services
MIKE CONWAY, JOSEPH
DANNELLY, LAURA JOYCE
GOUGH MARGARET LAW,
MEGHAN WHITMAN
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South Carolina.
It is published Monday,
Wednesday and triauy . o
the fall and spring semesters
and nine times during the
summer with the exception of
university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in
THE GAMECOCK are those
i of the editors or author and
• not those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher 0/TH E
GAMECOCK. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspaper’s
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported
in part by student-activity
fees. One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchasedfor $1 each from the
Department of Student Media.
ii'.
IcysroDjr^ATHr^J
Courtesy ofKRT Campus
TV cant rot brains if babies dont have them
Sesame Street videos
aimed at mere infants
would do some good
According to an. article
by The Associated Press,
the creators of Sesame
Street are catching some
serious criticism for
launching a new line of
videos Tuesday geared for
children as young as six
months.
Experts are claiming
that too-early exposure to
television is bad for babies’
brains. Parents, of course,
are in accord.
This is a ridiculous
debate.
I question whether
babies have brains. Making
fun of babies is one of my
lavv/iiLV paouinwi
Babies are worthless.
Toothless, hairless and
loud, they cannot move
properly or control
their impulses. Helpless
little flesh balls, they are
completely reliant on
others.
I didn’t get the maternal
gene.
Monday, my friend and
I were doing our regular
evening walk, we passed a
house with a huge banner
on the porch.
It proclaimed the arrival
of Rachel and Russell.
The people that live there
are now the
parents of
twins.
How
unfortunate.
I cannot
TECLfl tninK or a
mflRHOSKV ™orse ,fate.
c , iwins! A
Second-year
public llfe sentence
relations times two!
student The
decision to
breed children is akin to
voluntarily accepting a
life sentence in prison.
Yet countless numbers
of bright adults willingly
subject, themselves into
this bondage every year.
I can’t get excited for
Rachel and Russell’s
parents. I appreciate their
enthusiasm, but mv brain
can’t wrap around the idea
of such a commitment.
Contrary to what my
friends say, I do not hate
children. I like kids. I just
do not understand them.
In this case, ignorance
is bliss. In no way am I
interested in furthering
my understanding.
Kids have germs like
the Sahara has sand. They
produce an endless stream
of thick, milky mucus.
They eat dirt. They have
fungus. They are snot
dribbling, cookie-eating
monsters whose native
language is a shrill so ugly
it makes my ears bleed.
Babies are emotionally
unstable and short.
The only good thing
about babies is that you
can make them go to
bed at unreasonably early
hours and easily hide them
because of their size.
My heart goes out to the
persecuted Sesame Street
producers. Functioning as
a mob, overly-enthusiastic
and protective parents are
too much to bear. And
the professionals? Well,
the term “child rearing
expert” is an oxymoron.
All this hype over a 15
pound human? Parents
foolishly believe their
babies like them because
infants respond well to
food and smile when they
have gas! It’s a trick!
While they are
necessary, children are not
the precious gifts so many
parents think they are.
They have a long way to
go before they can prove
themselves of being worthy
of so much attention. In
the meantime, I have no
qualms of putting those
flesh balls in front of the
tube to enjoy Sesame
Street. Television is an
essential part of American
culture. The sooner they
integrate and shut up, the
better. It’s not like we’re
giving them whiskey.
Silence does not imply consent for sex
Rape victims need not
feel ashamed, guilty
after 1-night stands
For the past few weeks,
people told me to “sex
it up.” So, now that it’s
April, love is in the air and
it’s sexual abuse awareness
month, let’s talk sex. More
specifically, let’s talk rape.
The word itself is
harsh, dissonant and even
a little cacophonous.
When most people think
about rape they picture
“Law & Order: SVU”
episode: a testosterone
driven man attacking a
woman in an alley. Most
people wouldn’t say a
friend taking advantage of
a passed out drunk girl at
a party would be rape and
probably because most
of us have been in that
vulnerable position. We’re
quick to say, “I didn’t rape
anyone,” or “I didn’t get
raped.” Anyone that has
been there knows how
terrifying it can be.
And soon it starts to
feel like your fault. Maybe
you said
something.
Maybe
you wore
something.
If you came
forward.
Ill (Unlit! " . . ’
c , that is what
Second
year print everyone
journalism would
student think. Every
two and a
half minutes someone
in America is sexually
assaulted and most likely
by someone they know. Of
those, 80 percent are under
30, and only 42 percent of
assaults are reported. That
is a scary statistic.
Why don’t victims report
these crimes? Because
people are quick to blame
victims. But passing out
drunk, slurring your words
and stumbling across a
party isn’t the same thing
as a consensual one-night
stand. Rape is defined as
forcible sexual intercourse
without ponsent. But
newsflash, if someone is
unable to give consent,
i.e. legally intoxicated, she
:annot have consented to
sex.
When people get drunk,
usually — or hopefully —
they are with people they
trust. Rape is the biggest
violation of trust.
Why do we immediately
blame the victim or say
she’s lying? It is not
because she was drinking
or because she put herself
in that situation. When she
started drinking, I don’t
think she wanted to have
sex and completely forget
it the next morning.
Guys, if she really
wanted to have sex with
you, she’d do it sober.
Don t run the risk of
putting her in the position
of waking up in a daze of
“what happened?” If you
take care of her, put her
in bed alone and give her
coffee in the morning,
she’ll be thinking about
you when she’s coherent.
Girls like to be cared for,
not raped.
I’m not saying every
girl that’s had a one-night
stand thinks it’s rape. But
do you really want to take
that chance?
Winners & Sinners
Michael Blank
organized a group in
Texas called Jail Bait
X Justice, which helps
police capture online
sexual predators.
Supermodel Naomi
Campbell was charged
* with assaulting her
housekeeper with a cell
phone, her 2nd charge
against an employee. i
Subcommittee
demonstrates
how to make
better excuses
State representatives
offer sneaky maneuvers
for relationships, life
Are you looking for an
easy way to push a political
agenda without anyone
knowing?
--—, Our state
government
may have the
I answer you’ve
been looking
k for.
The House
TIIH education
mcmnnus subcommittee
Fifth-year Monday
print amended a
journalism bill to say the
student state Board of
Education can only approve
textbooks that “emphasize
critical thinking and analysis
in each academic content.”
On the surface this seems
like a great way for the
government to step into our
lives to teach our children
to have open minds.
Underneath, however, it
is part of the nationwide
movement to teach
intelligent design alongside
evolution — intelligent
design, of course, being the
politically correct version of
creationism.
To some, what’s under the
surface may seem obvious.
Rep. Ken Clark said, “I
think it’s pretty obvious,
given all the talk about
intelligent design.”
But Rep. Bob Walker
came up with the perfect
defense to such criticisms:
denying the obvious.
“This has nothing to
do with intelligent design
or creationism,” he said.
“It’s a way to help young
people look at things more
realistically.”
This defense can also
work well in your personal
life.
If your significant other
catches you being unfaithful,
say that you were trying to
“emphasize critical thinking
and analysis” about your
relationship.
She may suggest you’re
doing it for sex, saying, “I
think it’s pretty obvious,
given that you’re having sex
with another person.”
It is true that you just
wanted to have sex with
another person, but you
need to say that it isn’t the
reason.
While the response
“it’s a way to help young
people look at things more
realistically” may not be
annlicable, you could come
up with a more applicable
defense, saying you’re trying
to teach cheap floozies
to “look at things more
realistically.”
And if you’re late to
you’re 8 a.m. class tomorrow
because you wanted to sleep
in, you can “pull a Walker”
and tell your teacher that you
were “thinking critically”
about the “theory” that
showing up for class will
give you a better grade.
Should he point to how
obvious it is that you slept
in because you were lazy,
say you were trying to look
at things more realistically.
And so, my fellow South
Carolinians, if certain
representatives get their
way it may be hard to
learn anything in school,
but we can learn from the
representatives themselves.
If you need an excuse,
remember the phrases
“critical thinking” and “look
at things (pore realistically/j
_onrl inn’ll Kp in —