The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 29, 2006, Page 5, Image 5
monKS • conTinucDFRomi
their monastery.
^ According to Carolina
P Productions, the mandala
has “outer, inner, and secret
meanings.”
According to a news
release, “on the outer level
they represent the world
in its divine form. On the
inner level they represent a
map by which the ordinary
human mind is transformed
into an enlightened mind.
And on the secret level
they depict the primordially
perfect balance of the subtle
energies of the body and the
clear light dimension of the
• i n
The creation of the
mandala is said to purify and
heal on those three levels.
The opening ceremony,
which according to the
monks’ Web site consists of
about 30 minutes of prayer
and chanting to consecrate
the area that the mandala
will be constructed in, was
at noon Monday.
The monks are
constructing the mandala
using thousands of grains.
Each monk has a metal
funnel called a chak-pur.
They run a metal rod on its
* grated surface, which causes
the sand to pour out of the
funnel.
They will continue
construction until Thursday
at 2 p.m., when they will
hold the closing ceremony.
Mandalas are usually
destroyed shortly after
completion, representing
the impermanence of life
— a founding principle of
Buddhism.
During the closing
ceremony the sand from
the mandala is swept up and
placed in an urn. Half of the
sand is distributed to the
audience, and the rest is put
into a nearby flowing body
of water. The idea is that the
water carries the blessing to
the ocean, and from there
it spreads throughout the
_1 J
W U1 1U.
After Thursday’s closing
ceremony, the monks will
head to the College of
Dupage in Illinois, the next
stop on their tour.
Hillary Gillis, a first-year
anthropology student, was
happy about the mandala
being built.
“I think this is so awesome.
It’s a visual representation of
a prayer encouraging all the
followers to keep on their
path to enlightenment,”
Gillis said. “I can’t even
describe it.”
Comments on this story? E-mail
gamecocknews@gtum.sc.edu
Need Help?
V
U.S. Supreme Court hints at concern
in presidential wartime powers case
Gina Holland
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON — Supreme
Court justices appeared
troubled Tuesday by
President Bush’s plans
to hold war-crimes trials
for foreigners held at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
And several seemed
outraged by the
government’s claim that a
new law had stripped the
high court of authority
to hear a case brought by
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a
Yemeni who once worked
as a driver for Osama bin
Laden.
Hamdan has spent nearly
four years in the U.S. prison
at Guantanamo, and the
supreme Court has been
asked to decide if he can be
put on trial with fewer legal
protections before a type of
military tribunal last used
in the World War II-era.
The appeal could set
the stage for a landmark
ruling, and the courtroom
atmosphere was tense.
“The use of military
commissions to try enemy
combatants has been part
and parcel of the war power
for 200 years,” Solicitor
General Paul Clement told
justices.
Two years ago the
Supreme Court ruled that
“a state of war is not a blank
check for the president
when it comes to the rights
of the nation’s citizens.”
Hamdan’s lawyer, Neal
Katyal, told justices that
the Bush administration
is seeking a “blank check”
to do what it wants
with foreigners held at
Guantanamo Bay.
The U.S. prison has
been a flash point for
international criticism
because hundreds of people
suspected of ties to al
Qaida and the Taliban —
including some teenagers
— have been swept up
by the U.S. military and
secretly shipped there since
2002.
At first, the Bush
administration would not
let the detainees see lawyers
or notify family where they
were, and interrogators
used aggressive strategies
to extract information.
Only a few weeks ago, in
response to a victory in a
lawsuit by The Associated
Press, did the administration
release names or detainees.
Justice Stephen Breyer
said that lawyers for
Hamdan, who faces a single
conspiracy count, argue
there is no emergency to
justify the special trial.
“If the president can do
this, well then he can set
up commissions to go to
Toledo, and in Toledo pick
up an alien and not have
any trial at all except before
that special commission,”
Breyer said.
Without Chief
Justice John Roberts,
a conservative Bush
nominated last year, the
argument seemed lopsided
against the government.
Roberts supported the
Bush administration as
a lower court judge and
had to withdraw from
participating.
Justices Antonin Scalia
and Samuel Alito gave
hints that they support
the administration, both
suggesting that the high
court should delay a
decision until after the trial
is over — much like courts
do with regular criminal
defendants.
Roberts was on a three
judge panel of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia
Circuit that signed off
on the military trial for
Hamdan.
Scalia Jiad been asked
by five retired generals to
" withdraw from participating
in the case because of
remarks he made in a recent
speech in Switzerland about
“enemy combatants.” Scalia
said foreigners waging war
against -tne unitea states
have no rights under the
Constitution.
The outcome of the case
will likely turn on moderate
Justice Anthony M.
Kennedy, who questioned
Clement several times *
about the legal safeguards
for the trials. Kennedy said
that historically, prisoners
have been able to challenge
their detentions in court.
It was unclear whether
Clement resolved Kennedy’s
concerns. Clement brought
up the 2001 terrorist attacks
and said that presidents
going back to George
Washington used military
trials.
The Bush administration
has tried to scuttle the case
on grounds that the new
law stripped the justices’
authority to consider it.
The law passed late last year
•
bars Guantanamo prisoners
from filing petitions to fight
their detentions, and the
administration claims this
law retroactively voided
hundreds of lawsuits.
Justice David H.
Souter said it would be
“stupendously significant”
for Congress to
retroactively close courts to
constitutional challenges.
Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg said “it’s an
extraordinary act, I think,
to withdraw jurisdiction
from this court in a pending
case.”
Hamdan claims the
military commissions
established by the Pentagon
on Bush’s orders are flawed
because they violate basic
military justice protections.
i ms is a military
commission that is literally
unbounded by the laws,
Constitution and treaties of
the United States,” Katyal
told justices.
Hamdan, who was
captured in Afghanistan in
November 2001, is charged
with conspiracy to commit
war crimes, murder and
terrorism. He claims he
is an innocent father of
two young daughters and
worked as a driver for bin
Laden in Afghanistan only
to eke out a living for his
family.
Hamdan is among about
490 foreigners currently
being held as “enemy
combatants” at Guantanamo
Bay. Ten of the men,
including Hamdan, have
been charged with crimes,
but justices were told that
as many as 75 will be tried.
USC’s Totally
NEW Off-Campus
Housing Site
0 Searchable Off-Campus
Housing Listings
0 Pictures & Maps
* 0 Email/Web Site Links
0 Roommate Listings
0 Furniture to buy/sell
0 Summer Sublets to list for rent
www.sa.sc.edu/offcampus
i i k 4 $