The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 22, 2006, Page 6, Image 6
Some profs: Informal, oddball
e-mail blurs lines of etiquette
Gina Uasselli
STAFF WRITER
According to a New York
Times article, it might not
only be e-mail that leads
students to be informal with
their professors.
“I don’t know if students
have become more informal,
demanding, inappropriate
with the advent of e-mail,”
said Neil Levens, a USC
psychology professor. “I
suspect that if e-mail did
not exist those students
would still find ways to be
inappropriate.”
Levens agrees with the
article’s sentiment that
American culture might be
U!_
tv t/iauivi
“E-mail feeds into the
whole ‘consumerism’ culture.
We want and often get our
consumer goods right now,
so students may assume that
it is appropriate and even
their right to have ‘access’ to
their professor right now,”
Levens said.’’(students)
don’t understand that we
are people who teach other
classes, conduct research,
participate in committees,
and have families.”
E-mail might be helping
students to be informal with
their professors, but for
some, that is the goal.
“My goal in using e-mail
with students is to have
them be more informal,”
said Kent Sidel, a journalism
professor. “My intro mass
comm classes can reach 200
students. In-class student
participation and questions
are limited by the size of
the class, so e-mail becomes
a way in which I can get to
i; know and relate to student
issues and concerns.”
However, most professors
have rules for their students
when it comes to e-mail.
“My guiding rule in
replying to all students is,
would I be comfortable
seeing what I just wrote
in tomorrow morning’s
Metro section of The State
newspaper?” Sidel said.
Chemical engineering
professor Edward Gatzke has
a few rules for all students
ranging from etiquette to
suggestions for the business
world.
“Always assume anyone
and everyone will see your
e-mail or IM message or
posting. E-mail can be
forwarded and IM logs get
copied,” he said.
He also suggests that
students wait until tomorrow
to send'angry e-mails. “You
generally cannot get e-mail
back once you hit send,” he
said.
io avoid conrusion and
uncomfortable situations,
Gatzke suggests students get
a “business account” to use
for e-mailing professors or
looking for work.
“ ’Super—sexy—mamma®
yahoo.com’ may not
be appropriate for class
communication or when
looking for a job,” Gatzke
said.
When it comes to
contacting professors
directly, students should
“avoid forwarding racy e
mail to your professors. This
puts them in an awkward
position,” Gatzke said.
English Professor Thomas
Rice agrees. Rice said he
could think of one instance
where a student took e-mail
too far.
“Some student sent
me an inane link to some
ultra-conservative, right
wing political Web site,”
Rice said. “I used this as an
opportunity to discuss with
the student the importance
of developing some
analytical insight, or just the
ability to think for oneself.”
Despite the risks, e-mail
can be a big help to students
outside of the classroom.
“I did have one student
in the past who was having
some serious issues outside
of class involving domestic
violence,” Levens said.'
“She was afraid to use her
phone, but she was able
to communicate with me
through e-mail. I got her in
touch with people to help
her. I don’t know what the
final outcome was, but I
would like to believe that
she received the help she
needed.”
E-mail might cause
headaches for some
professors, but most
students don’t think about it
too much.
“I think it’s great that I can
e-mail professors because
due to my schedule I can’t
make any of my professors’
office hours, so it’s really
convenient,” said first-year
international studies student
Mike Perlmutter.
However, most students
also try to maintain
some kind of formality
when speaking with their
professors.
“I try to be formal with
them because it seems kind
of rude (to be informal)
when asking them for help,”
Perlmutter said.
Gatzke suggests students
remember that things are
not thrown away on the
Internet.
“Your ‘web presence’
can be used against you.
Employers sometimes
‘Google’ your name looking
to see what tracks you have
left,” Gatzke said.
Gatzke said he is not
bothered by informality,
but believes “it is good
practice for students to act
professionally.”
Comments on this story? E-mail
gamecocknews@gwm. sc. edu
Lfllil • COflTIflUED FROfTl 5
W. Wilkins in response to
Barghaan’s comment.
The final case, Clem
ente v. Roth, involved an
improper but consensual
sexual relationship between
a plastic surgeon and a pa
tient. Joseph Clemente, on
behalf of his deceased wife
Paige, contended that Dr.
Charles Cardany was medi
cally negligent and that the
National Health Institution
was at fault for credentialing
Dr. Cardany as a contract
physician.
After taking questions
from the audience, Judge
Shedd said students did
USC proud by attending.
“I just wanted to say you
did yourself proud and the
USC Law School proud to
day,” Shedd said. “I’ve been
to many oral arguments at
other schools and only a
dozen students show up.”
Approximately 300 people
were in attendance. Judge
Karen J. Williams said that
she was happy to be back at
her alma mater.
“I have a great love for
the USC School of Law,”
Williams said.
Comments on this story? E-mail
gamecocknews@gwm.sc. edu
HILBOURDG • CODTiniiGD PRO(Tl S
Jerry,” she said.
Kilbourne presented
several slides with ads
from magazines targeting
corporations in the
advertising industries
magazine.
An ad sponsored by
Family Circle magazine
read, “To alcoholic beverage
marketing executives:
Women make up 48 percent
of your market. You need to
reach our 16 million to earn
your market share.”
Kilbourne said the
audience shouldn’t trust
advertising-reliant news
sources.
“You can’t get accurate
information from a media
which is dependent on the
goodwill of advertisers,” she
said.
Kilbourne encouraged the
audience to look at the ads
that target them daily.
Comments on this story? E-mail
gamiXocknews@gu>m.sc. edu
SSmrMII
■Bi
I I
n 1 v J W- fl j|ii^^j 1 ■JTTT3 j• kf■ 11>'I7 I j '|fl
I