The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 30, 2005, Page 7, Image 7
VIEWPOINTS
AMECOCK
EDITORIAL BOARD
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Viewpoints Editor
BRINOY McNAIR
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
IN OUR OPINION
During logo legalities,
recall who came first
The University of South Carolina. The University of
Southern Cal. Both USCs. Both major collegiate powerhouses
in athletics and academics. Both causing a whirlwind of debate
in terms of what is used to represent them.
Southern Cal is in the process of litigation with South
Carolina over the mark of the Gamecocks’ baseball squad.
Carolina’s current symbol is a script-style interlocking “SC,”
resembling the style of the Yankees symbol. The Trojan nation
seems to have issue with the design, saying it resembles their
baseball symbol too closely.
The problem with the situation — we’ve already changed this
symbol once.
Carolina’s baseball program used to be associated with a block
style “SC” that Southern Cal now uses for all its other major
letters “SC” and who should have the right to use them. The
I U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is handling the dispute and
will ultimately resolve the issue, possibly as soon as next fall.
But why wait? Lets see who has the advantage in head-to
head competition.
USC-West has won 12 national championships in baseball
alone, the latest coming in 1998. This is a far cry from USC
East’s two national titles in the entire athletics department.
Edge: USC-West.
However, South Carolina represents an entire state, while
Southern Cal is a private school representing only a portion of
California. Edge: USC-East.
The ultimate tiebreaker — South Carolina was established as
a university long before California was a even made into a state.
USC-East wins.
But only time, and the patent offices Trademark Trial and
Appeal Board system, will tell who gets to keep the mark.
sports programs. University offi
cials looked into the resemblance
and found the need to change,
adopting the current symbol
worn by our beloved Gamecocks.
The debate is over use of the
South Carolina was
established as a
university before
California was even
made into a state.
IT’S VO UR RIGHT
Exercise your right to voice your opinion.
Create message boards at
www. dailygamecock. com
or send letters to the editor to
gamecockopinions@gwm. sc. edu
CORRECTIONS
In the Nov. 16 The Mix, the photograph of The Letter Red featured in ]
the calendar should have been attributed to Chris Yarborough.
The Gamecock regrets this error.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
bditor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARO
Asst. Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Sports Photo Editor
KATIE KIRKLAND
Page Designers
MIKE CONWAY, JESSICA
ANN NIELSEN, MEGAN
SINCLAIR
Graphic Designer
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH
Copy Editors
CHELSEA HADAWAY,
KRISTY LAU8E,
KATIE THOMPSON,
JAMISON TINSLEY
LIZ WHITE
Online Editor
RYAN SIMMONS
Creative Services
JOSEPH DANNELLY,
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH,
MARGARET LAW,
MEGHAN WHITMAN
STUDENT MEDIA I
i
Director
SCOTT UNDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COLLINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
Advertising Manager
SARAH
SCARBOROUGH
Classified Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
C. NEIL scon
Advertising Staff
BREANNA EVANS,
RYAN GORMAN,
KATIE CUPPIA,
APRYL ALEXANDER,
MARY RACHEL
FREEMAN, MCKENZIE
WELSH, DEIDRE
MERRICK
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South
Carolina. It is published
Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and
spring semesters and nine
times during the summer,
with the exception of
university holidays and
exam periods. Opinions
expressed in THE
GAMECOCK are those of the
editors or author and not
those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications and
Communications is the
publisher 0/THE
GAMECOCK. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspaper’s
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported in
part by student-activity fees.
One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchased for $1 each from
the Department of Student
Media.
b
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
The Editor's office hours are Monday and Wednesday
from 1-3 Pm
Editor: game cock edit or@gwm. sc. edv
News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@gwm.sc. edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPR@yahoo. com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom. 777-7726; Sports: 777-7182
Editor's Office: 777-3914
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
» 1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S. C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
*WRE THANKFUL RK M BREADS, OUTSOURCING. DOWNSIZING, DOUBLE-WGfT PfiOFTT MATINS.."
Cartoon courtesy of KRT Campus
Why not just say what were all thinking.?
Far more prevalent than
parking, campus lacks
sufficient sex dialogue
As a copy editor for the
Viewpoints section of The
Gamecock, I’m sick of reading
about racism online and
parking.
Everyone knows racism
exists everywhere in the world,
so why are we surprised it exists
on the Internet?
And as for parking, it sucks.
Anyone who walks or drives
down Bull Street knows that.
If columns in our newspaper
were to actually reflect the issues
weighing on the average
student’s mind, John Doe would
be walking around thinking
about parking, Facebook and
the random political issue. But
that’s not what the average
college student spends class
daydreaming about. What’s
really on the mind of students
today?
Sex. Let’s talk about sex.
More than half the freshman
class has had sexual intercourse
or some sex act, and as they get
older the number of partners
only multiplies. So of all the
issues facing our student body,
it might be the most intimate,
but it affects us all.
From those who never have
sex to the ones who have too
much sex, it is a common
ground, something we can all
relate to. And who doesn’t need
a little sex advice? Then why
can’t we talk about it?
With eight
pages of sports
and mosdy
male
columnists, the
female portion
LIZ of our readers
UJHITC deserve a little
„ , attention, and no
second-year . .
print one ever saJo
journalism guys couldn’t
student learn a thing or
two in the
process.
Let’s face it: Most guys don’t
know what women want. They
even made a movie about it,
but men are still pretty clueless.
But I think the most
important reason why we should
have a sex column is because 50
percent of this campus is female
and 50 percent of us need
girlfriends. Maybe you think it
only happens to you, but honey,
you are not alone. We can gripe
and complain, moan and groan
about relationships together.
' I find my best friends'and I
spend a good portion of our
dinner break talking about guys,
pondering thoses infamous
questions every girl has to ask
herself and her girlfriends at
some point during her dating
career. And to be totally honest,
my friends and I are getting a
litde sick of bouncing the same
ideas off each other every AIM
chat. It’s share time, girls.
Maybe I could try to be deep
and say this is somewhat like an
anthropological testament of
college behavior, or I could just
tell the truth and say it’s time
we realize-women like to talk
about sex.
It might seem a litde shallow,
but it’s on all our minds. After
all, men think about sex about
once every 20 minutes or so, and
I don’t think — if women were
totally honest — the softer sex
would be far behind that
probably incorrect statistic.
As teenagers we learn most of
what we know from the media, a
little from that awkward “birds
and the bees” talk with the
parentals and the rest from our
peers. What girl didn’t love a
good girl gossip, when Susie said
she kissed that boy at the school
dance? And what guy didn’t love
to share his sexual triumphs with
his best friends?
As young adults we’re growing
out of that awkward stage. Sex
might be an intimate topic, but
until we’re comfortable talking
about it, how will we ever be
comfortable with our sexuality?
It’s taken a lot for me to get
here — and I won’t bore or
depress anyone with any of that
nonsense — but I’m starting to
get comfortable making other
people uncomfortable.
Some of you might be
looking for Mr. Right or maybe
just Mr. Right-now — for the
male readers substitute Mrs. —
but everyone needs to
understand you’re not alone.
We’re all going through the j
same things in our own unique,
amazing fabulous way.
So, let’s talk about sex, baby.
Tookie: Deblock dignitary or lethal infection?
Is redemption reason
enough to pardon killer,
award him Nobel Prize?
It’s almost exam week. I’d
like to discuss a related topic:
the death penalty.
Because exams usually fall
between a firing squad and
Mein Bowl’s sweet-and-sour
chicken in terms of cruel
punishment, life and death are
flashing before our eyes. If ever
we caught glimpses of Satan
out of the corners of our eyes,
now would be the time. We’re
all teetering on the brink of the
seventh circle of hell.
I’m hearing all kinds of stuff
about how the U.S. is
approaching its 1,000 th
execution since the Supreme
Court reinstated the death
penalty in 1977. This is a
pretty grim countdown, worse
than VHl’s “One Hundred
Greatest Colostomy Bags.”
I’m for the death penalty.
Forget how the Bible says “eye
for an eye.” Some crimes cross
the line into a deviance
- befitting evil that has no right
to survive. But the question still
stands: Does someone deserve a
second chance? It’s hard to say.
I saw a movie starring Randy
Quaid as a convicted murderer.
He was strapped in to the
electric chair, said his goodbyes
and they threw the switch.
Something
malfunctioned,
a bolt of
lightning shot
through his
head and the
STEUEfl circuits shorted
UMIHflREII out- When he
_ . woke up, he had
Fourth-year . ,
mechanical amnesla
engineering couldn t ever
student remember
killing anybody.
I didn’t get to the end of the
movie, but I know everyone
started grappling with whether
to try to refry his beans.
Tough call. To tell you the
truth, I haven’t made up my
mind about redemption. Take
Stanley “Tookie” Williams, the
founder of the Crips gang
scheduled to die by lethal
injection Dec. 13. He was
convicted of killing four people.
Sentencing is a funny thing.
Twenty-five years for a bag of
pot? That’s ridiculous. Five years
for stealing? That’s better. Death
for death? That’s right. At the
time he was convicted and
sentenced, this was the right call.
Skip ahead. Williams
becomes an anti-gang crusader.
He’s nominated for a Nobel
Peace Prize.
Jamie Foxx, who portrayed
Williams in a TV movie, is
pushing for clemency. Calif.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzfenegger is
considering it.
I think Williams has done
nothing more than a lot of
other changed men in prison.
They write books, they plant
trees, they build things. Most
men in prison have reformed:
“Hey, I haven’t killed anyone
since I’ve been in here! Isn’t that
something?”
I don’t see the difference
between the Nobel and fixing up
bikes for kids. Nobel’s wisened,
peacemaker connotation has
jacked up sympathy.
Williams isn’t clinically
insane. He wasn’t wrongfully
accused. DNA testing — which
I’m all for — hasn’t cleared his
name. He hasn’t spent his time
in prison inventing a machine to
reanimate dead people. Time
moves forward, and none of this
community repair can move
back the clock, no matter how
“Nobel” the cause.
No murderer will ever ride
Of Sparky if they just act real
nice and plant a tree. I’m not
saying Williams is dishonest in
his efforts; I’m saying if people
push for his release on grounds
of reformation, they’ll have to
do it for everybody, or at least
for the good actors.
(Tough decision. But it’s
time to go. This is probably
my last regular column. I can
only say thanks, a thousand
times.)
X
Our campus:
the very best,
the Very odd,
the very bad
With my last column,
campus’ crazy quirks
come to light — at last
I am tired. I have three
research papers due, and until
this morning, I
■ couldn’t come
up with a topic
for this column
worth the 500
words it would
take to fill the
sue*
' 6RCGG "*>?? “ th'
Biggest
Fourth-year Challenges
interdisciplinary ,
studies student a n
Champions
for Me on the Columbia
Campus of the University Of
South Carolina.”
No. 1 — What is up with
the BA Building? The water is
always ice cold, and there is a
terrible smell in the
classrooms that seems to get
worse as the floors get higher.
I’ve always wondered if that
smell is indicative of some
type of health hazard.
No. 2 — Why can I never
seem to find the ladies’
restrooms in the Jones
Physical Science and Sumwalt
buildings? Does there seem to
be twice as many men’s rooms,
or am I waiting too late to go?
No. 3 — Is there some
unwritten rule that says
pedestrians can walk in the
street even after the light has
changed?
No. 4 — Why can’t more
instructors get used to using
DiacKDoarar
No. 5—The most obvious
of all the challenges — the
parking situation? Why is it
that we pay tuition while it
seems university officials are
more concerned with
providing parking for guests?
An honorable mention goes
to the elevators in the
humanities building. Taking
four flights by stairs is not so
bad; but if you prefer to take
the elevator to go up, give
yourself at least 10 minutes.
The biggest champions for
me on campus are as follows:
No. 1 — VIP is the reason I
don’t know where half the
campus offices are located.
VIP cuts most of the time and
energy that could be wasted
when it is time to “take care of
business.” I believe that it is
the single best overall tool that
USC has for its students.
No. 2 — The Russell
House is a great entertainment
spot. If you haven’t had the
time to take a look a around
the facility, I believe that it
would be to your advantage.
No. 3 — Online library
resources offer many wonderful
alternatives to actually going to
the libraries in person. This is
especially helpful to a student
who does not live on campus.
No. 4 — The Gamecock
(newspaper, that is). That’s
really all that needs to be said.
No. 5 — 90.5 WUSC-FM
Columbia. Under the
leadership of former and
current station managers Rae
Hatton and Will Bovender,
the station has been doing a
great job of building upon the
foundation of educational
radio at its best. If you are
tired of listening to the same
things over and over (and
over) again, WUSC is the
experience for you.
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less
than 300 words and include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. Letters
will be edited. Anonymous letters will
not be published. Call the newsroom at
777-7726 for more information.
&