The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 21, 2005, Page 6, Image 6
VIEWPOINTS
th3%amegock
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
IN OUR OPINION
'Immersive memorial
makes light of tragedy
Including an “immersive” area in a Manhattan museum to
honor victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World
Trade Center is a rotten idea.
Part of the Lower Manhattan Development Corp.’s tentative
plan for the Sept. 11 museum at ground zero calls for an inter
active exhibit combining pictures of the falling towers with
recordings of howling sirens.
The intention, planners say, is to make viewers feel as if
they’re in the towers during the attacks.
Particularly reprehensible is the thought of airing voicemail
messages left by victims on Sept. 11 to dramatic effect. Who
wants the voice of a dead mother or father or sister or brother
or daughter or son forever echoing in some cheap gimmick
chamber?
That planners would even
consider an attempt to recon
struct the events of Sept. 11
reveals outrageous insensitivity.
No theme park-style experience
can ever adequately capture the
horror and chaos victims knew that day. Nothing can.
To try is to turn our nation’s most painful hour into a specta
cle. It’s like housing relics of our profoundest tragedy in a laser
tag arena. Any exhibit remembering the shock and despair
hijackers caused four years ago should be solemn and respectful,
not some attraction best viewed while eating an elephant ear.
Silence. That’s what the museum should emphasize. That’s
what hung over the nation on the morning those terrorists’
dread design sucked the breath from every man, woman and
child in America. Silence.
Have some respect for the dead. Have some respect for the
men and women still dying in the Middle East, sent there —
right or wrong — as a direct result of Sept. 11.
We hope planners will come to their senses as the museum
takes shape over the next few years, that they’ll forgo canned
sound effects for quiet and let the towers’ deafening absence
speak for itself.
It’s like housing
relics of our most
profound tragedy in
a laser tag arena.
IT’S VOUR RIGHT
Exercise your right to voice your opinion.
Create message boards at
wivw.dailygamecock. com
or send letters to the editor to
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us at
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Editor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Asst Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Sports Photo Editor
KATIE KIRKLAND
Page Designers
MIKE CONWAY, JESSICA
ANN NIELSEN, MEGAN
SINCLAIR
Graphic Designer
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH
Copy Editors
CHELSEA HAOAWAY,
KRISTY LAUBE,
KATIE THOMPSON,
JAMISON TINSLEY
LIZ WHITE
Online Editor
RYAN SIMMONS
Creative Services
JOSEPH DANNELLY,
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH,
MARGARET LAW,
MEGHAN WHITMAN
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
scon LINDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COLLINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
Advertising Manager
SARAH
SCARBOROUGH
Classified Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
GAREN CANSLER
Advertising Staff
BREANNA EVANS,
RYAN GORMAN,
KATIE CUPPIA,
APRYLALEXANDER,
MARY RACHEL
FREEMAN, MCKENZIE
WELSH, DEIDRE
MERRICK
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
The Editor's office hours are Monday and Wednesday
from 1-3 p.m.
Editor: gamecockeditor@gwm.sc. edu
News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@gwm.sc. edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPR@yahoo.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726; Sports: 777-7182
Editor’s Office: 777-3914
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South
Carolina. It is published
Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and
spring semesters and nine
times during the summer,
with the exception of
university holidays and
exam periods. Opinions
expressed in THE
GAMECOCK are those of the
editors or author and not
those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications and
Communications is the
publisher 0/THE
GAMECOCK. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspapers
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported in
part by student-activity fees.
One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchased for $1 each from
the Department of Student
Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
Some Secies op irkq
Showed R>rtY percent of
^THEIR PuSUC N»T VoTlNGr,
Cartoon courtesy of KRT Campus
Boys will soon become over-protective dads
Eventual father writes
letter to his daughter,
20 years in advance
A lot of strange things
happen to us as we’re growing
up. Going to sleep becomes
fun. Ponies start disappearing
off our holiday wish lists. Most
disturbingly, the things out
parents have told us all out
lives start to make sense.
That’s because, whether we
like it or not, we’re growing
into the adult phase of out
lives. What does this mean foi
the warm-blooded males who
read my column every week?
It means we’re about to
undergo a miraculous
transformation.
In a few years, we’ll stop
having girlfriends and start
having daughters. We’ll stop
being the offense and start
being the defense.
Last year, I printed a column
that pretty much amounted to
a letter to my future wife. If all
goes well, eventually, I’ll also
have a future daughter to
worry about. There are a
couple things I would like to
go ahead and address with het
now so I don’t have to play bad
guy when she’s old enough to
fight back.
With no further ado, and 20
years in advance, I present a
letter to my future princess.
To the most beautiful young
lady I know:
I’m so proud of you. You
turned out to be much more
rthan I ever
could have
asked for.
While you
know I
absolutely
CHHSC a^ore you, your
ST0UDEIW1IRE m°ther has
told me you
Second-year ^
history . . ,
student haPPy wlth me
right now.
Perhaps that explains why you
aren’t speaking to me. I hop^
you’ll listen as I try to explain
why I’ve done all of these
things you’re upset about.
I know you loved volleyball,
but one day you’ll be glad that
I made you quit. We both
know those shorts they made
you wear did a much better job
of showing a detailed outline
of what’s underneath than of
actually covering anything up.
I think you need to consider
taking up a less provocative
sport. Like pingpong.
I understand you don’t think
it’s fair that your brother gets
to do more things than you,
such as leave the house on the
weekends. But you also have to
understand that there are lots
of boys out there who aren’t
your brother, and one of the
things that they would like to
go out and do is, well, you.
Nothing fun happens on the
weekends, anyway.
I know you like to play
practical jokes, but the
pregnancy test in the trashcan
really took things too far. Yes, I
want grandchildren, but I can
assure you — it doesn’t take
that long to figure out how to
put A and B together. So no,
it’s not necessary to get in a few
years of practice before you —
and your HUSBAND —
decide to make it happen.
I know you’re upset that
you’re grounded, but next time
I tell you not to drink, I’ll be
sure to specify alcohol. I would
hope you don’t need me to tell
you not to drink antifreeze.
And next time, you should go
ahead and assume that when I
say be home at 11, I mean
p.m., not a.m.
Yes, it is unfortunate that
every boy you’ve brought home
for the past few years has
mysteriously disappeared
within a week, but I’m afraid
we aren’t going to be able to
have a proper relationship if
you keep accusing me of
murder.
By the way, the new shed in
the backyard needs to stay
locked at all times.
I hope that soon you’ll feel
comfortable talking to me
again instead of sending notes
scrawled in red ink. Your
mother tells me that nowadays
you feel more like a prisoner
and less like a princess.
True, you should be able to
have and do anything that
makes you happy. But if you’re
a princess, that makes me the
king. It’s the king’s job to
protect his princess.
Much love, Daddy
IN YOUR OPINION
Most white people
find race irrelevant
Demond Elliot asks Randy
Dargan how he would feel if he
was on the other “side of the
fence,” (“Dargan should think
about how blacks feel,”
Wednesday). Would Mr.
Dargan, as a white adult, share
the views of many blacks, or
would he act as if it never
happened?
Well, I cannot speak on
behalf of my friend Randy, but I
can say this: The majority of
whites at USC don’t think about
the fence.
When we were growing up in
school, we learned about racism
and its history in America. We
learned about the injustices
played out against blacks from
slavery to Jim Crow laws and
beyond. We learned about the
unfulfilled promise of 40 acres
and a mule. But we studied
black history as innocent little
children.
As a child, I knew racism had
been carried out by whites
against blacks. But I never felt
like I was part of the problem
just because I was white. My
parents weren’t racist and I
wasn’t racist, so why would I
ever think that I would be on a
certain side of the race issue?
But now I am an adult — a
white adult. And now, all of the
sudden, I’m part of the
hypocrisy in America. Now I’m
part of white America, and I’m
now partly responsible for the
injustices in America.
Ten years ago, it wasn’t my
fault. But now it is my fault.
I know there are pent-up
emotions. I’m not saying blacks
have been treated fairly — that
is certainly not the case.
But, blacks wonder why
white USC students don’t seem
to understand the race issue.
The reason we don’t see it like
most blacks is that we don’t look
at it from either a white or a
black perspective. Blacks our age
have probably felt discriminated
against. And consequently,
blacks tend to view the racial
issue in America from a black
perspective. But most young
whites haven’t ever felt like they
were the discriminators.
I understand the “try walking
in our shoes” argument. But
understand this: You might put
on “black” shoes in the morning
— and maybe some people put
on “white” shoes in the morning
— but when I wake up in the
morning, I put on my shoes and
go about with my day.
We don’t feel like we are on
the other side of the fence.
Jonathan Hardin
Third-year business student
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less
than 300 words and include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions®gwm.sc.edu. Letters
will be edited. Anonymous letters will
not be published. Call the newsroom at
777-7726 for more information.
Do you think the Sept. 11
memorial museum should
include an Immersive’
area?
www. dailygamecock. com
SECpolicy
keeps games
from being
fan-friendly
Students should not
have to worry about
other team’s feelings
So I learned the hard way.
Not physically, thank heavens,
but by exposure. I learned to
love the
American
pastime of
football.
But you can
take the
nnpnn Englishman
out of England,
BRAZIER but notthe
Third-year England out of
philosophy jje Englishman.
student ,
When I see our
sports back home, we have a
culture. An identity. A
commitment.
It’s fairly obvious most
Americans don’t really get
association football. They even
give it the old upper-class
English nickname of “soccer.”
There is a prevalent opinion
that soccer fans are somehow all
hooligans, lovers of violence.
That’s a mistake if ever I
knew one. The confusion
comes from our deep-seated
passion that burns so bright it
can be blinding. Swearing and ~
cursing at players, the referees
and especially the opposition
is everything.
But somehow, the SEC
wants me to behave. Even in
the middle of a passionate
game of football, respect is
meant to be shown to
everyone. No charging on the
field, no offensive chants —
basically, we’re supposed to be
little robots. Does that strike
anyone else as wrong?
The l band, for example,
astonishes me every time I see
the Gamecocks, by being
there for hours upon hours
trying to lead the team. In my
opinion, if they could lead
more “extreme” chants, I’d
think these people were
demigods. Even cheerleaders
mildly entertain me, but it’s all
so “nice.” Football isn’t meant
to be “nice.” “Nice” is golf. I
want blood and thunder.
The argument that football
is a family sport is ridiculous.
Having men pound into each
other and cause injuries,
intended or not, is a
celebration of violence.
Look, when we play
Alabama or whomever, I have
the right to call their team a
bunch of inbred hicks. If
students want to celebrate a
win against the basketball
college of Kentucky by running
on to the court, they should be
allowed to.
We, as both fans and
students, pay our fees and
support our teams. Student
athlete safety is paramount, but
at the same time these people
choose to play their sports. The
NCAA system is well designed
to encourage student-athletes
to be prepared beyond sports,
but sport is usually their main
reason to be here.
As it stands, I think the
SEC is a joke. I want to be
passionate and bleed garnet
every game. Going to a bar
and crying as the Gamecocks
get thrashed by Auburn does
not endear me to our
Alabaman friends, so why
should I pretend it does?
Until the day that sports
lose their soul, expect an irate
Englishman to be in Williams
Brice Stadium hurling abuse at
our opponents. If you don’t
care as much as I do, then go
and work for some governing
body and try and take away
the soul of the sport further.