The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 17, 2005, Page 4, Image 4
VIEWPOINTS _
AMECOCK
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
IN OUR OPINION
Jailed Miller didn't aid
First Amendment Jight
After The New York Times rehashed reporter Judith Miller’s
role in the Valerie Plame scandal in Sunday’s edition, it’s becom
ing increasingly clear that Miller is anything but a champion for
the first amendment.
Miller’s detractors have long expressed cynicism over her deci
sion to go to jail rather than reveal the identity of the confiden
tial source she cited in articles that revealed the identity of an
undercover CIA agent.
Miller’s critics have pointed out that she served as more of a
cheerleader for the Bush administration’s crusade for weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq than a hard-nosed news reporter, and
it’s true that the Times eventually had to apologize for some of
her reports, in which she put too much stock in White House
claims.
The New York Times also
reported Sunday that some of
Miller’s colleagues at the paper
have refused to work with her in
the past, and the story quoted
The Times’ Executive Editor Bill
Keller as saying, “I wish it had been a reporter who came with
less public baggage.” (
While general solidarity among journalists attended the news
that Miller — and Time magazine’s Matthew Cooper — might
go to jail for refusing to reveal confidential sources, the rate at
which that support tapered off amid questions about her true
motives proved telling.
But regardless of how history will ultimately judge Miller and
The New York Times, the outcome we fear most is a concern
that others have already raised: That this high-profile case might
lead to more rollbacks of first amendment rights in courtrooms
nationwide. After all, special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald
sent Miller to jail, sat back and got exacdy what he was after —
the identity of her confidential source.
We hope these results don’t embolden other prosecutors to
use Fitzgeralds tactics in other, more legitimate cases.
The New York Times’
Judith Miller proves
anything but first
amendment martyr.
IT’S VOUR RIGHT
Exercise your right to voice your opinion.
Create message boards at
www. dailygamecock. com
or send letters to the editor to
gamecockopinions@gwm. sc. edu
CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us at
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
r? J ■ I I
MICHAEL Lzr3R3IA
Design Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Viewpoints Editor
BRINOY MCNAIR
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Asst. Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Sports Photo Editor
KATIE KIRKLAND
Page Designers
MIKE CONWAY, JESSICA
ANN NIELSEN, MEGAN
SINCLAIR
Graphic Designer
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH
Copy Editors
CHELSEA HADAWAY,
KRISTY LAUBE,
MELISSA MAULDIN,
KATIE THOMPSON,
JAMISON TINSLEY
LIZ WHITE
Online Editor
RYAN SIMMONS
Creative Services
JOSEPH DANNELLY,
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH,
MARGARET LAW,
MEGHAN WHITMAN
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock Advertising: 777-3888
1400 Greene St. Classified: 777-1184
Columbia. S.C. 29208 Fax: 777-6482
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on thirdfloor of the Russell House.
The Editors office hours are Monday and Wednesday
from 1-3 p.m.
Editor: gamecockeditorGPgwm, sc. edu
News: gamecocknews9gwm. sc. edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions9gwm.sc. edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures9gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports9gwm.sc. edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPR9yahoo.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726; Sports: 777-7182
Editor's Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
SCOTT LINDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COLLINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
Advertising Manager
SARAH
SCARBOROUGH
Classified Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
GAREN CANSLER
Advertising Staff
BREANNA EVANS,
RYAN GORMAN,
KATIE CUPPIA,
APRYL ALEXANDER,
MARY RACHEL
FREEMAN, MCKENZIE
WELSH, OEIDRE
MERRICK
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South
Carolina. It is published
Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and
spring semesters and nine
times during the summer,
with the exception of
university holidays and
exam periods. Opinions
expressed in THE
GAMECOCK are those of the
editors or author and not
those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications and
Communications is the
publisher o/THE
GAMECOCK. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspapers
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported in
part by student-activity fees.
One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchasedfor $1 each from
the Department of Student
Media.
Cartoon courtesy of KRT Campus
Thumbs up for ratified Iraqi constitution
Despite failed attempts,
new government gains
support from majority
I knew something
momentous was about to
happen in Iraq. It’s always a
good rule of thumb that if
network news isn’t reporting
anything from Iraq of
Afghanistan, great progress is
being made.
As I watched jubilant Iraqis
dancing in the streets, purple
thumbs held high to signify
they were proud of their vote
on their new constitution, my
mind could not help but drift
to a Richard Pryor movie, and
the missed public relations
opportunity it signified.
In the film, Pryor, the
notoriously profane comic, is
fired from his job as a transit
engineer. He rages at his boss,
demanding to know how he
could be fired after years of
faithful service.
wncn iic uoiic, iic
punctuates his tirade by
shoving his raised index finger
in his startled boss’ face.- The
film immediately cuts to Pryor,
back at home, being consoled
by his wife. Head in his hands,
he sobs to his wife, “all those
ye&rs, and they just fire me —
and then I gave him the wrong
finger!”
It seems like maybe
someone in the state
department could have had a
little more ingenuity in
coming up with what finger
was going to be printed. After
all, what is the vote on the
Iraqi constitution if not the
proverbial
“finger” to all
the forces of
evil and
terrorism that
have done
JACOB their ,best ,t0
OOUIS stop thls day
from coming?
Third-year Th tried t0
electronic \
journalism stoP t^ie ^.S.
student liberation of
Iraq in the first
place.
When that failed, they tried
to stop the interim government
from being set up.
Again they failed. They
failed when Iraqis turned out in
huge numbers to elect their
first representative assembly.
That same assembly has now
drafted an Iraqi constitution,
which will almost assuredly
pass.
As of Sunday, reports came
out of a more than 60 percent
turnout nationwide, with more
than 70 percent in some
traditionally repressed Shiite
areas.
The Sunni Muslims
everyone feared would try to
torpedo the election (forgive
the pun) by staying away from
the polls, turned out in strong
numbers as well, displaying
their willingness to participate
in the new Iraq.
While many Sunni voters are
expected to vote “no” on the
constitution, their votes signify
their willingness to work
within the governmental
structure, as opposed to trying
to blow up that governmental
structure. The Kurds in the
north also turned out strong in
support of the new
constitution.
Reports of violence were
virtually non-existent, as were
problems with the voting
itself. The Kurdish north,
which represents almost a
third of the country, but is
never reported on since it runs
flawlessly, could have passed
for most U.S. precincts on
voting day.
This is a historic time, not
only for Iraqis, who are taking
their first fledgling steps as a
democracy, but also for
Americans, as we help them
move forward in the
democratic process.
In only a few short years,
Iraq has been changed from a
Stone Age terrorist police state
into one that could shortly
join Israel as the middle east’s
only other democracy. It is
truly an exciting time to be
alive.
It is true that attempts to
clean up the Middle East have
come before. Since WWII, the
area has been notorious as the
hotbed for terrorism and
subversive radical Islam.
Treaty after treaty has been
signed. ,
Numerous negotiations,
peace conferences and UN
resolutions have been tried.
But never before has true
democratic reform been given a
chance.
Now, with a new
constitution being voted on in
Iraq, we are seeing history
being made right before our
eyes.
IN YOUR OPINION
Biased media outlets
hurt real journalists
As a student in the School
of Journalism and Mass
Communications, I am being
trained to become a good
reporter with some good
credentials, reporting the news
based on facts, not political
party affiliation. As I flip
through the newly revamped
Gamecock Cable, 1 see the
liberals at CNN and the
conservatives at Fox News,
talking about the happenings
of the day. Getting upset at
this visual tirade, I got up from
my chair and went to the
newspaper stands, hoping to
catch a breather from politics,
only to get my hopes crushed.
I see the conservative Wall
Street Journal and the liberal
New York Times. Geez, this
future journalist just cannot
get a break.
When I thought my day
could not get any worse, it did.
I went to Political Science 370
(an introduction to public
administration). Because this
is an upper-le^el course, there
are not many students in that
class from the journalism
school. On this particular day,
.
we started the class by
mentioning how the media
affects the process of public
administration, meaning
which stories will air on the
news tonight or which stories
will run in the newspaper the
next day.
My professor chose to start
class off with this topic
because of the Armstrong
Williams situation. Williams,
a South Carolina native, was
paid $240,000 to make
comments about President
George W. Bush’s No Child
Left Behind act of 2001 on his
radio show. To make a long
story short, Williams’ scam
was discovered, his column has
been pulled from newspapers
including The State and his
syndicated radio show has
been pulled off the air. One
comment made by my fellow
classmate placed everything
into perspective — this has
been going on, but this is the
first time somebody has been
caught.
I am sitting there, thinking
to myself, “Is it too late to
change my major?” Yes, it is
true that I am a political
science minor, but when will
this party favoritism crap stop
, *
among the networks?
In this sea of political
reporting, many networks
choose to take a side, which
goes against what was taught
in journalism schools around
the country — to provide the
public with fair and balanced
news. If getting in front of a
camera or going to the scene of
the latest conflicts means I
should forget about the proper
way of delivering news, then I
should find a new major.
Being a journalist means
telling somebody the news and
letting the people formulate an
opinion about it. I want to tell
these one-sided media outlets
to save their feelings until
Election Day. Now that is
something worth talking
about.
KIMBERLY HALLUMS
Third-year electronic
journalism student
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less
than 300 words and include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. Letters
will be edited. Anonymous letters will
not be published. Call the newsroom at
777-7726 for more information.
Student IDs:
Your ticket
to becoming
more reliable
College kids can learn
more responsibility,
stop whining about fee
Last week I lost my
CarolinaCard, and you know
what that means. I couldn’t get
-— into my dorm
or eat, and
because I put
off self-paced
astronomy to
the last minute,
- I couldn’t even
fiilcc an
mcmnnus tes,
Third-year After two days of
electronic starving, foiling
murnalism , ° ,
student “d near‘y
crying, I decided
to pay the $25 fine for my
irresponsibility.
USC is sitting on a
goldmine.
It I ve learned one thing
from The Gamecocks op-ed
page — which I haven’t — it
would be that students
complain. And one of their
favorite topics for complaint is
how pricey tuition is. But
clearly, USC must get funding
from somewhere to hire
legendary football coaches who
produce mediocre seasons.
Raising tuition, frankly, gives
students the right to complain.
But fines charge students for
their irresponsibility, giving
them no right to complain.
If USC were to double the
fines for losing a CarolinaCard,
it would give the university
nearly twice as much revenue
on CarolinaCard replacement
alone. But the CarolinaCard
Fining Department, who I’m
nearly on a first-name basis
with, must look beyond simple
replacement fees.
Should someone try to pay
with American currency in the
Thomas Cooner Librarv. fine
them $50. Should someone
try to get food by giving the
guy at Chik-fil-A their social
security number, fine them
$50 and don’t let them eat —
USC should not reward
irresponsibility with food.
If a student were to try to
take an astronomy test with
their Social Security number,
fine them $50. If not at the
last minute, still charge them
$50, but let them take the test.
While USC should exploit
students’ irresponsibility, the
university should reward the
early-bird brand of
responsibility. If it is at the last
minute, however, USC should
refuse them the test and
double the fine.
Should a student try to get
into his dorm without their
CarolinaCard, give them a
choice: Pay the $50 fine, or be
homeless for the night.
With the irresponsibility of
the student population, USC is
indeed sitting on a complaint
free goldmine, but some might
point out one potential flaw in
the university’s most obvious
choice of action: with all these
fines, students might learn a
little responsibility, and thus
destroy a good bit of the
university’s funding.
In 2001, if a student lost
their CarolinaCard — or “ID
card” as they were called in
those days — they were fined
a mere $5, but during fall
2002, the fines were increased
500 percent. USC should
simply increase the fines by
500 percent once more —
bringing it to $125, for those
of you without calculators.
In conclusion, I would like
to say, with my track record, I
hope to God USC doesn’t take
this column seriously.
T