The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, August 22, 2005, Page 5, Image 5
_ _VIEWPOINTS
AMECOCK
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
News Editor ;
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
Design Director
chas McCarthy
IN OUR OPINION
Keep intelligent design
out of science textbooks
If, as some have suggested, American science teachers present
philosophical theories like intelligent design alongside Darwins the
ory of evolution, it would make the line between science and reli
gion — not to mention church and state — dangerously indistinct.
When President Bush this month said schools should teach both
sides of the evolution debate, it sparked controversy over what sci
ence textbooks in American schools should include.
Christian conservatives have aligned themselves on the side of
intelligent design, which argues that some organisms are too com
plex to be explained using only Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Critics have argued that no scientific basis exists for intelligent
design, and some have gone so far as to label it a clever trick for
slipping creationism back into classrooms. Sadly, the debate has fast
become more political than scientific.
. . 1 heones like intelligent design
The°nes like should be availablc to K_12 stu.
intelligent design ,
should be available 'but °"ly m prop" “““■
tO K 1 2 StUdentS Students should be left to decide
for themselves what worldviews
and personal philosophies they adopt.
However, intelligent design should not appear in science books
alongside Darwins theory of natural selection, as some have sug
gested. The former is a concept rooted more in faith than in sci
ence, while the latter is a conclusion drawn from empirical process
and the scientific method. Scientists can’t sail to the Galapagos
Islands to determine whether some higher power built the Venus
flytrap.
Intelligent design represents a subjective philosophy, not a
testable scientific theory. Therefore, it should be presented in
schools as such. One possible solution might be creating a separate
class geared toward discussing contrasting philosophical ideas.
However policymakers decide to address the controversy in the
classrooms, one can only hope that common sense and the ability
to differentiate between philosophy and science — not buzzwords
and political Web logs — will lead states to make the right deci
sion.
IT'S VOUR RIGHT
Exercise your right to voice your opinion.
Create message boards at
tvww.dailygamecock.com
or send letters to the editor to
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc. edu
CORRECTIONS
USC Football player Jonathan Joseph was misidentified in Thursdays
issue. The Gamecock regrets the error.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Editor
MICHAEL LaFORGIA
Deurn Director
chas McCarthy
Copy Desk Chief
STEVEN VAN HAREN
News Editor
STEPHEN FASTENAU
Asst. News Editor
JUSTIN CHAPURA
Viewpoints Editor
BRINDY McNAIR
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
The Editor's office hours are Monday and Wednesday
from 1-3 p-m.
Editor: gamecockeditor@gwm.sc.edu
News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc. edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc. edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@gwm.sc. edu
Public Affairs: gamecockPR@yahoo.com
Online: www.dailygttmecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726; Sports: 777-7182
Editor ’s Office: 777-3914
The Mix Editor
ALEXIS ARNONE
Sports Editor
JONATHAN HILLYARD
Asst. Sports Editor
ALEX RILEY
Photo Editor
NICK ESARES
Sports Photo Editor
KATIE KIRKLAND
Page Designers
JULIAN GARIS, JESSIC
ANN NIELSEN, MEGAN
SINCLAIR
Graphic Designer
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH
Copy Editors
KATIE THOMPSON
Online Editor
RYAN SIMMONS
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
SCOTT LINDENBERG
Faculty Adviser
ERIK COLLINS
Creative Director
SUSAN KING
Business Manager
CAROLYN GRIFFIN
l Advertising Manager
SARAH SCARBOROUGH
Classified Manager
SHERRY F. HOLMES
Production Manager
GAREN CANSLER
Creative Services
LAURA-JOYCE GOUGH,
JOSEPH DANNELLY,
MEGHAN WHITMAN,
MARGARET LAW
Advertising Staff
BREANNA EVANS, RYAN
GORMAN, KATIE
CUPPIA
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S.C.
29208
\
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
$ i
THE GAMECOCK is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of the
University of South
Carolina. It is published
Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and
tprirtg semesters and nine
times during the summer,
with the exception of
university holidays and
exam periods. Opinions
expressed in THE
GAMECOCK are those of the
editors or author and not
those of the University of
South Carolina. The Board
of Student Publications and
Communications is the
publisher o/THE
GAMECOCK The
Department of Student
Media is the newspaper’s
parent organization. THE
GAMECOCK is supported in
part by student-activity fees.
One free copy per reader.
Additional copies may be
purchased for $ I each from
the Department of Student
Media.
‘.1
—SoMUCH FoRTodATs BiOtPGr LfiSSoN onlKIfeLUGfiKTDeSiGN."
TURNING NOW TO THe SUBCTecT oF "iNTBULiGeNT GeoGRAPHY..."
Cartoon courtesy of KRT Campus
Help me stamp out sky-high gas prices
Regulations, state taxes
have more to do with
increases than Bush
Like most college students, I
think I’m pretty much oblivious to
the “real world” outside, and, don’t
get me wrong, I like it that way.
That means it takes a pretty
serious event to shock me out of
my stupor, especially this early in
the year.
I must say there is nothing like
rifling through the change tray of
your car at 2 a.m. to focus your
mind on the current gas price
hike. Jogging back out to your
car to get the change, while a line
of seedy, lottery ticket buyer
types wait for you, helps, too.
Columnist note: The writer
has no problem with people who
play the lottery, or as he likes to
call it, “the tax on people who are
bad at math,” mostly because
they’re financing his education.
However, he challenges anyone to
look him in the eye and tell him
“seedy” isn’t the right word to
describe someone buying lottery
tickets, malt liquor and copies of
Swank at 2 a.m. from the
Kangaroo off Assembly.
Additional columnist note:
The writer also does not have any
problems with malt liquor,
although he considers Swank a
bit below his taste.
Anyway, as I was fishing for a
□ precious nickel
that had fallen
between my
seats, or, as I like
to call it, .0003
gallons of gas,
Jacob my mind drifted
Dauis t0 t{ie Problem
high gas prices.
Third-year How cou,d k be
print
journalism ™at *> a t“r“*y»
student hard-working
college student in
this great state of South Carolina,
was reduced to paying for gas
with change?
I immediately dismissed the
idea that it had anything to do
with the $50 I had blown
downtown a few hours earlier. I
quickly decided this must be
someone else’s fault, and resolved
that they would get a nasty letter
from me as soon as I saved
enough to buy some stamps.
While wondering if you could
put stamps on lay-away, I began
to scan my mind for likely
culprits. I occasionally watch
CNN Headline news, mostly for
the bottom-line sports scores
when ESPN is on commercial,
but I do occasionally ingest some
“real” news.
At first I thought it might have
something to do with George W.
Bush and his “War for Oil.” After
concluding that argument was
only fit for someone not allowed
to handle anything sharper than a
cantaloupe, I started thinking
about the real reasons gas is so
expensive.
First off, thanks to many
helpful environmental regulations,
the U.S. hasn’t built enough
refineries to turn all the oil we have
into gas fast enough to keep up j
with demand. Fewer refineries j
trying to produce more and more
gas equals a shortage, and that
means more expensive gas.
Secondly, also thanks to
regulation, every state basically
produces its own blend of gas to
conform to its standards,
meaning that the few refineries
we have are not only stressed
trying to turn crude into
gasoline, but they are trying to
turn it into mora than 20
separate grades to conform to
each state’s standards.
Finally, more than half the price
you pay for gas is in taxes, a lot of
it state taxes. The price of gas
could be cut in half if the
government would get out of your
pocket when it comes to pump
and-slash gas taxes.
So, the next time the attendant
at the gas station gives you a dirty
look for handing her a sack full of
nickels, invite her to join you in
writing a nasty letter to the
government, or the Sierra Club for
that matter. Heck, I’ll even give
you the stamp.
Clean Access: A dirty new network problem
Technology Services
creates more hassle
with Cisco ‘solution’
Last year, University
Technology Services put a new
program, Perfigo SmartEnforcer,
onto the university network in an
attempt to reduce the number of
attacks by viruses, worms and
Trojan horses.
This so-called SmartEnforcer
was intended to scan your
computer for vulnerabilities and
lock them down via firewalls,
patches and virus updates. Alas,
the university’s network
bodyguard was about as effective
as a flashlight to a blind man. It
was more of an inconvenience
than anything else, and it never
really worked.
I was able to log on to the
network without the most recent
virus updates or windows patches
installed on my computer. I would
say that’s pretty ineffective
protection.
SmartEnforcer was also to
blame for the instances in which
the university network went down,
as the server that hosted
SmartEnforcer kept crashing.
University Technology Services’
response to the numerous
complaints about this was simply
that the network was working
better than it had been the year
before.
This year the university
switched from Perfigo
SmartEnforcer to a similar
program — Cisco Clean Access
Agent. I hoped
this particular
program would
be an
improvement
and would fix
Brian many of the
0 problems
Buran F c ,
bmarthnforcer
Fourth-year caused> and for
computer ,
information thc most Part “
systems student appears to have
done so.
I was required to have the most
recent virus updates and patches,
and it conveniently comes with a
little “remember me” checkbox to
make it easier for me to log in.
And surprisingly, to the best of
my knowledge, it has not crashed
the network. Some things are too
good to be true.
Last Friday, different portions
of the network began to crash
around campus. But why? Where
was our faithful network
bodyguard?
A worm — a self-replicating
code, which uses its host to find
more hosts, and so on and so
forth — had infected university
computers and was causing
excessive network traffic,
bringing the entire system to a
screeching halt.
This sort of incident was
supposed to be prevented by
Cisco Clean Access Agent. What
happened? Why was I left high
and dry and exposed? I don’t
know the answer to that
question, but if I had to venture a
guess, I would say it is simply
that, once again, the “solution of
the day” does not work.
My question to UTS is this:
How much time, money and
student inconvenience is necessary
before a solution is found to
problems like these? 1 don’t mind
the inconvenience of an
additional log-in if it means I can
access my high-speed network
connection without any worries of
slowdowns or crashing. How
about instead of fiddling and
experimenting with “solutions”
which prove to be more of a
problem than they’re worth,
people do a little research.
What are other universities
doing to control problems like
this? I mean, someone has got to
have it figured out by now, or at
least they’ve come close. I know
very few other universities have as
many widespread problems with
their networks as we do. Do they
use additional annoying programs
with multiple log-ins and
tirheouts? No. They find other
solutions that work better and
don’t inconvenience people.
Technology Services needs to
realize that simply slapping the
Cisco name onto a product will
not fix our problems.
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less
than 300 words and include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopimons@gwm.sc.edu. Letters
will be edited. Anonymous letters will not
be published. Call the newsroom at 777
7726 for more information.
www. dailygamecock. com
Purposeless
Housing fees
drain money
from students
*
New educational fee
could expand research
campus, room checks
For a while USC has sought to
expand its “research campus” and
bring new learning opportunities
j---- to its students.
Always the
innovator in thfc
_ field of
education, the
university is
implementing a
Jessica tactic that will
Foster undoubtedly
Fourth-year bring nationwide
Prmt acclaim to this
student fine institution.
What is this
tactic, you ask? It’s quite brilliant,
really. Not only will students
learn in the classroom, but they
will be further educated in the
comfort of their dorm rooms.
This, I assume, is the purpose
of the $30 “educational fee” USC
Housing is imposing on top of its
$20 activity fee for students living
in the dorms — unless its just
another way for them to pad
funds. But USC would never do
that, especially considering many
students have to live on campus
and are already paying thousands
of dollars per semester to do so.
If all dorms were filled to
capacity, there would be about
7,221 students living on campus.
That would be roughly $216,000
made available with this new
“educational fee.”
I can only imagine how
Housing will put it to use. Even
though the money might seem to
disappear into the black hole that
consumes lab fees, technology fees
and parking fees, I’m sure that this
will actually help students learn.
Rumor has it the curriculum is
to include informative seminars
like How to Prepare Easy Mac,
Parking Ticket Evasion and
Culture Shock For Y’all
Northerners. However, efforts are
still being made to ensure that
lesson plans don’t overlap with
essential survival skills taught in
University 101.
Each dorm room will come
equipped with an instructor, dry
erase board and desks that
convert into lounge chairs.
Added perks are late-night fire
drills and lectures on the dangers
of having candles and George
Foreman grills in the room.
Allow me to forewarn you that
these items are very dangerous, so
you shouldn’t even try having
them. If you do, they will catch
you and make you stand in the
corner wearing a cone-shaped hat
that will also be provided with
the “educational fee.”
If all goes as planned, this new
fee will follow the same course as
the activity fee, which has always
reaped benefits. My favorite
Housing-sponsored activities
were hall meetings and filling out
surveys. Those pencils we used
were top-of-the-line.
And I must say that I
commend University Housing
for having the courage to ignore
decisions made by the student
run Residence Hall Association.
The organization’s senate couldn’t
justify a fee increase, but
apparently Housing either didn’t
know this or didn’t care. A small
casualty for the sake of progress.
My only regret is that I don’t live
on campus to partake in this
exciting endeavor. Granted, I do
miss living in small spaces, signing
in visitors, submitting to sporadic
room checks and nighttime quiet
hours. But this is history in the
making: an all-encompassing
approach to education that will
forever change the system.
Luckily, I have my candles and
George Foreman to console me.