The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 21, 2005, Page 6, Image 6
MOVIE REVIEW
Fro* the <rr Iter-01 rector o»' "Soda arO donaters"
Liam Neeson Laura Linney
KINSEY
Let’s
talk
about
sex
? * -f * J » iJL l.. i i* , "'£* t > *• 1
Kinsey reverses taboos,
questions social norms
“Kinsey”
★★★★ out of ☆☆☆☆☆
By LESLIE DENNIS
THE GAMECOCK
“Let’s talk about sex.”
Most people today are not even
phased by this tagline for the film
“Kinsey.”
But in the 1930s and 1940s, the
. mere mention of sex, let alone an entire
conversation about the subject, was
taboo and mostly resulted in “don’t do
it before marriage”.
However, Alfred Kinsey attempted
to bring the most carnal of man’s desires
to the forefront of America’s
consciousness and reveal the sacred
secrets of America’s bedrooms.
The film begins with Kinsey (Liam
Neeson) coaching his research assistants
oh how to take a successful and truthful
• sexual history by revealing his own.
Moving through a childhood and
. adolescence of sexual repression and
Christian conservatism enforced by his
father (John Lithgow), Kinsey
ultimately rebels against his father’s
wishes for him to become an engineer
and goes into the biology field.
While studying, collecting and
teaching a coarse on gall wasps, Kinsey
meets and marries one of his students,
Clara “Mac” McMillen (Laura
Linney).
ru> uicii lauuiy cApauui uuuugn me
years and Kinsey continues to teach at
Indiana University, students begin to
consult Kinsey about sexual problems
they are having with their husbands,
wives or significant others.
In one of these sessions, Kinsey is
appalled to find out that the couple he is
counseling believes that oral sex causes
female reproductive problems.
When Kinsey looks into the couple’s
claims, he finds the current sexual
education is uninformative and is used
as propaganda for a certain socially
dictated type of sexual behavior.
Kinsey then decides someone must
answer questions about sex instead of
avoiding the subject and begins a
“marriage” class that quickly turns into
a research study of sexual practices.
• With the help of assistants Clyde
- Martin (Peter Sarsgaard), Wardell
. Pomeroy (Chris O’Donnell) and Paul
Gebhard (Timothy Hutton), Kinsey
' embarks on both an ambitious study of
sexual behavior and a risky game with
human emotions.
With a protagonist — or antagonist,
depending on your opinion — like
Kinsey, the film could easily be turned
into a laughable disaster or perverse
exploitation, but apt director and writer
Bill Condon, also the writer/director of
the haunting and controversial “Gods
and Monsters,” carefully handles and
openly discusses the subject matter
simultaneously.
Just as in “Gods and Monsters,”
Condon successfully recreates the life
of a man who disregards social norms
and struggles with his own inner
demons.
As Kinsey, Neeson gives an
incredibly controlled and subtle
performance, one that will most likely
gatner him a second Academy Award
nomination for best actor.
His performance is just as brilliant as
his depiction of Oskar Schindler, for
which Neeson received his first Oscar
nomination.
Linney, an Oscar nominee for “You
Can Count on Me,” plays the
supportive-yet-outspoken Mac to
perfection and once again displays her
versatility as an actress.
Veteran actor and two-time
Academy Award nominee Lithgow saves
his character from becoming the cliched
overbearing father and vigorously
exhibits the range of the character and
his own acting.
but perhaps the strongest or the
supporting cast is Sarsgaard, a young
actor on a roll with consistently amazing
performances like that of his hard-yet
fair New Republic editor Chuck Lane in
“Shattered Glass” and the constantly
stoned gravedigger Mark in “Garden
State.”
Sarsgaard seems natural and
effortless in the role of the bisexual
researcher and lover of both Kinsey and
Mac. Although Sarsgaard slips with ease
into all his roles, his understated passion
and quiet grace as Clyde firmly secures
him as one of the best actors of his
generation.
With strong performances from the
entire cast and the powerful hand of
Condon guiding the camera and script,
“Kinsey” not only shows the impact
Kinsey had on the way society perceives
and expresses sexuality but also
intelligently displays the importance of
continually questioning the social
«
norm.
Comments on this story? E-mail
gatnecockfeatures@gwm.se. edu
Spring Break on sale...save NOW!!!
X2TRAVELCUVS 1-800-592-CUTS (2887)
See the world your way Call or book online!
Movie Releases j
i;v_
L “Assault on Precinct 13”
“Are We There Yet?”
Winter weather wardrobes
add style to keeping warm
By Lisa Jones Townsel
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
When you think of a down coat, what’s the first
thing that comes to mind? Warmth? Coziness? A
profile resembling the Michelin Man?
Yeah, I thought so.
But by far, this synthetic mix of nylon, polyester
and, sometimes, down feathers is among the best
barriers against winter’s fury. The challenge is
making it look less, well, inflated.
Let’s face it. The coats are big. Bodacious. Even
the titles of a few, which refer to “puff” in the name,
point to their mammoth size.
“With the older down coats, it was like you were
carrying around an extra sleeping bag on top of you,”
suggests Maeghan O’Hagan, co-owner of Clayton
based Lusso. “Now, they’ve gone to great lengths to
make it more wearable and less like camping gear.”
Nowadays, you can dress up down.
“The right pieces together can make a great outfit,
like a great pair of cropped pants and a short-waisted
down jacket,” notes Jacob Laws, visual merchandiser
for Splash. To illustrate his point, he paired a
tangerine shrunken jacket with cropped pants with
lame banding.
People might be surprised to learn that even coats
that say down aren’t always filled exclusively with
feathers. “There’s a lot of simulated down. It has the
look and same effect: w^mth,” Laws says, adding,
“The addition of other materials helps to keep your
coat’s shape.”
Coats typically have somewhere between 20 to 80
percent down feathers combined with fillers.
Want something more than the basic blanket
form? Laws says check for designers with “a cool
edge.”
Embellishments also help. Regular white coats
with brassy gold detailing can’t help but stand out.
And coats in robust hues, including cotton candy
pink and sky blue, look good enough to be
plucked.
We caught up with Monroe G. Milstein, chief
executive officer of Burlington Coat Factory
recently. During a phone interview, Milstein called
the down coat the year’s No. 1 fashion, at least in the
coat market. “More than any other coat this year, it’s
selling,” he says. “It’s selling this year was far
superior to any other year. Ordinarily, they stop
buying coats right before Thanksgiving, but this
year’s going so strong that we put in additional
orders for January.”
But the coat mogul acknowledges that color
variety and easy maintenance are only a part of the
appeal. The puff is a must.
“The truth is, the flatter ones aren’t as warm,” he
says. “It’s from the depth of the pile; that’s where you
get the insulation. It’s not like the old Michelin Man,
but the puffier ones are warmer.”
Does he deny that that depth results in a puffier
profile?
“No, it doesn’t make you look fat, but it doesn’t
make you look anorexic either,” Milstein says before
asking, “Do fur coats make people look fat?"
Down feathers can be one of the
warmest materials for a winter coat, and
fur trim can add extra protection from
wind and harsh winter temperatures.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
Fr WUSC DESK
Destroyer
Notorious Lightning & Other Works (Merge)
Daniel Bejar is a strange one. When not working with Neko Case, A.C.
Newman and co. as a part of indie-rock supergroup the New
Pornographers, Bejar moonlights in his quirky and bookish side project
Destroyer. Based on his work in Destroyer, one imagines Bejar leads a rather
solitary life, rapidly and maniacally devouring Victorian poetry by moonlight.
But rest assured, he still finds his way to the bar, and this is where the
Destroyer persona manifests itself in a sort of magnificent oddball pomp. After
one regretful, ill-timed remark, a drunken Bejar slams his fist down and begins
to cackle, and the resulting monologue is the basis for Destroyer’s lyrics.
Bejar’s vocal delivery is one of the most unique you will ever come across. His
rambling, melodramatic style is like a cross between David Bowie’s
androgynous croon and William Shatner’s rigid method acting. Indeed, Bejar
often sounds more like a drunken, crazed, out-of-work Shakespearean actor
than a proper rock singer. On “Notorious Lightning & Other Works”, Bejar is
in rare form as he reworks songs from 2004’s “Your Blues” along with
Vancouver-based art-rockers Frog Eyes. The songs here are less
MIDI/keyboard-based, as Frog Eyes provides a twinkling, melancholic palette
that provides Bejar with all the fanfare his highly theatrical narratives demand.
The song “Notorious Lightning” is the highlight here just as it was on “Your
Blues.” Bejar’s dramatic monologue builds and builds, gaining in urgency as
he chants “Someone’s got to fall before someone goes free” until he explodes
into yelping la-la-la’s before rapidly skipping off into the sunset of his
screwball fantasy. It is a fact that Destroyer’s lovable eccentricities take some
getting used to, but to know Daniel Bejar is to love him, and if he has his way,
you too will have “Destroyer” embroidered on your jeans.
K IT TC3T
Black Mountain
Black Mountain (Jag Jaguwar)
Eugenics is a dirty little secret of this great nation. In the first half of the
20th century (and some would argue still today), our government
sought to isolate the gifted within the population and engineer a superior race
of Einsteins, Elvises and Captain Americas. Perhaps remnants of this wayward
project remain today, buried deep beneath the Appalachians. If we are seeking
proof that these mad scientists have any aspirations to create the perfect rock
‘n’ roll band, look no further than Black Mountain. Splicing the DNA of Ozzy
Osbourne, Lou Reed and Mick Jagger, Bl^ck Mountain’s debut album
amalgamates the considerable talents of these men into one monstrous rock ‘n’
roll opus.
Borrowing Black Sabbath’s penchant for blistering hard-rock grooves, the
Velvet Underground’s guitar-mangling, and the drug-induced stomp and sexy
swagger and soul of the Stones, Black Mountain appropriates everything that
is good and vital about the “classic rock” of the late ‘60s/early ‘70s. Whereas
classic rock radio has taken the sting out of many great songs by not only
beating a dead horse but continually running over it for 20 years, this band of
Vancouver revisionists still revels in the raw power and glory of classic rock ‘n’
roll music. “Don’t Run Our Hearts Around” could have been one of the best
songs on Sabbath’s “Paranoid” if Ozzy was channeling American blues and
soul music instead of Satan and evil fairies. In fact, in a just world, “Don’t Run
Our Hearts Around” would be a smash commercial hit. It’s the song Josh
Homme (Queens of the Stone Age) has been trying to write his whole career.
On its self-titled debut, Black Mountain does not simply erect a Mount
Rushmore to Ozzy, Mick, Lou and others — they manage to rework these
timeless influences in their own image.
By Jordan Redmond
WUSC MUSIC DIRECTOR
r- ' yw'