The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 29, 2004, Page 4, Image 4

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

ONLINE POLL Were you aware of the Creed p 4 Week events’ Go to rage h- www.dailygamecock.com to vote. Friday, October 29, 2004 Results posted on Friday. TH#%A! COCK EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR COPY DESK CHIEF Adam Beam Gabrielle Sinclair DESIGN DIRECTOR VIEWPOINTS EDITOR David Stagg Wes Wolfe NEWS EDITOR SENIOR WRITER Michael LaForgia Kevin Fellner THE MIX EDITOR ASST. NEWS EDITOR Meg Moore Jon Turner IN OUR OPINION USC overreaches on student groups Last November, USC President Andrew Sorensen quietly added sexual orientation to USC’s nondiscrimination policy. USC offi cials had taken lots of heat about the issue from USC students, and the administration didn’t feel it was necessary to publicize its policy change. But this semester the Student Life department sent a memo to all campus organizations stating they must update their constitu tions with the new sexual orientation clause or they cannot be an official student organization. This means, according to Student Life Director Jerry Brewer, that the USC should not , . ,, . . organization will be taken off exert so much ® . . , UoC s Web site and cannot use control over ... USC facilities for meetings or other student groups, 6 unless the events‘ university gives A maiorit>r of student orgamza the grOUpS money r‘ons rece've funding directly from the school. A portion of student activity fees goes to Student Government, who then decides how to divide up the money to student organizations. But there are a number of student groups, such as the NAACP and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, who do not receive this money because they are organizations with a political or religious mission. If a student organization receives funding, USC reserves the right to regulate it. However, if student groups don’t receive USC funding, either by force or by choice, then USC officials should not have the authority to dictate student constitutions. This issue isn’t about sexual orientation. We find it hard to believe any stu dent organization on campus would endorse discriminating against anyone. Students should have the right to organize with other students who share their interests and not have to worry about USC offi cials dictating group policy. We understand that USC has to worry about liability issues, so its regulation should be limited to restrict ing activities on USC property, not on policy and ideas expressed in student organizations. IT’S YOUR RIGHT Exercise your right to voice your opinion Create message boards at www.dailygamecock.com or send letters to the editor to gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS Ofi Wednesday’s front page, Evoka was misidentified in a photograph. In Wednesday’s The Mix, “War Pigs” should have been credited to Black Sabbath. The Gamecock regrets the errors. If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us at gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. i-——-——— -1 ABOUT THE GAMECOCK EDITOR Adam Beam CONTACT INFORMATION nc«irw niocrmo Offices on third floor of the Russell House. David Stage The Ed,tor s office hours are Monday and Wednesday from 3*5 p.m. copy desk chief Editor: gamecockeditor@gwm.sc.edu Gabrielle Sinclair News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc.edu news editor Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu Michael LcForgia The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu Sports: gamecocksports@gwm.sc.edu asst_news editor Public Affairs: gamecockPR@yahoo.com Jon Turner Online: www.dailygamecock.com viewpoints editor Newsroom: 777-7726; Sports: 777-7182 Wes Wolfe Editor's Office: 777-3914 ™E“'XEDIT0R STUDENT MEDIA The Gamecock is the Meg Moore editorially independent sports editor director ^ student newspaper of . Jonathan Hillyard Sc0,t Lindenberg the Universjty 0f south asst, sports editor faculty aoviser Carolina. It is Daniel Kerr Erik Collins • published Monday, Wednesday and Friday E“™ creative director during the fall and Susan King spring semesters and photo editor business manager nine times during the Jason Steelman Carolyn Griffin summer, with the sports photo editor exception of university Katie Kirkland advertising manager holidays and exam pageoesigners Sarab ScarborouSh periods. Opinions Erin Cline, Jennifer classified manager expressed in The Logan, Chas McCarthy, Sherry F. Holmes Gamecock are those of Jessica Ann Nielsen, the editors or author Staci Jordan production manager and not those of the copy editors Garen Cansler University of South Jennifer Freeman, creative services Carolina. The Board of Anna Huntley, Daniel Burke Lauderdale, Student Publications Regenscheit, Jason Chelsea Felder, Laura and Communications is Reynolds, Jennifer Gough Joseph tbe Publisher of The • Sitkowski, Shana Till, Danneily Kristen Gamecock. The Steven Van Haren, Joel Williams' Department of Student Wallace Media is the online editor advertising staff newspaper's parent E.B. Davis Robert Carli, Breanna organization. The Evans, Ryan Gorman, Gamecock is Jane Fiekten, Katie Miles Caroline ^s,upfoded |n Part bV Johnson, Katie Stephens student-activity fees. One free copy per TO PLACE AN AD reader. Additional The Gamecock Advertising: 777-3888 copies may be 1400 Greene St. Classified: 777-1184 purchased for $1 each Columbia, S.C. 29208 Fax: 777-6482 from the Department of ___ Student Media. y H<? WA5 f 5|TT(N6 TH^e /T'S JU5r ^ I WATCHiMb (rtfcCTlOM m 7V(AT TV HA5 PC6M F** I fl" ‘T^J'i iiS CARTOON COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS _ ; ——— - ■ : S 7 Bush creates fantasy, calls it reality ■ The president still misleading American public on the Iraq war Like George W. Bush, previous presidents, both Democratic and Republican, have led the country into wars based on lies, shrouded themselves in a veil of secrecy and used their power to enrich campaign contributors. While at an extreme level under this administration, this type of behavior is not new. Our country and the entire planet face increasingly difficult challenges, and right now the United States is led by people who live inside their own fantasy world. In a recent debate, Bush promoted America’s missile defense program. He told the world that “We say to those tyrants who believe they can blackmail America... you fire, we’re going to shoot it down” — practically daring a nuclear state to launch a nuclear missile at us. Unfortunately for us, the missile defense program doesn’t work. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, previous Pentagon evaluator Phillip Coyle, former Chief of U.S. Strategic Command Eugene Habiger and all independent evaluators the program, the missile defense system recently deployed in Alaska can’t protect America from a nuclear missile. Nor will it be functional in the near future — it might never be functional. Even the chief weapons evaluator in Bush’s Pentagon says that, at best, the missiles have “20 percent” functionality. Yet, Bush applied his “bring it on" bravado to a nuclear missile attack on our cities. Feeling safer? We know that the administration MICHAEL “ , about n p n m Saddam s non delKvj , existent nuclear, CO-HOST OF chemical and THE SEED SHOW, WCEO 840 AM biological weapons; misled the country about Iraq/al Qaeda ties; and brouglit America into an illegal, unprovoked war which has killed or wounded tens of thousands of people, including thousands of Americans. It is possible, however, to lie to the public but still understand reality yourself. The Bush administration shows no indication it can do this. As it became apparent that America was going to invade Iraq regardless of the degree to which Saddam submitted to inspections, the International Atomic Energy Agency pleaded with the administration to make sure that America secures Saddam’s largest stockpiles of high level explosives. In the build up to the invasion, the IAEA had enacted a tight monitoring process on these weapons to ensure that they did not fall into terrorist hands nor would they be used as part of a nuclear weapons program. The Bush administration ignored the warnings of the IAEA. Three hundred and eighty tons of these explosives have gone missing. These weapons are likely being used by Iraqi insurgents daily as roadside bombs, and some are probably in the hands of terrorists looking to attack the United States. So the Bush administration ignores the pleas of the IAEA. Not vety sensible, but not surprising considering his feud with the organization during the buildup to the war. Still, you would still expea them to listen to the advice of their own generals. Before the invasion, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric K. Shinseki told the administration that it would need to roughly triple the number of troops proposed by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in order to control Iraq. Instead of listening to his advice, Bush forced Shinseki into early retirement. Army Secretary Thomas White backed up Shinseki’s assessment, and Rumsfeld soon fired him. Shinseki and White were right, as even former Chief U.S. Administrator of Iraq Paul Bremer admits, and their failure to take his advice has had a lot to do with the chaos we now see in Iraq. The climate heats up, and Bush’s Gulf War ally Tony Blair calls it the most serious crisis feeing humanity. Bush puts his head in the sand. The HIV epidemic ravages America and the world — our leadership talks about abstinence-only education. As real problems emerge and grow, this administration reueats to its own Paer Pan world. And all of us living in this real world are paying the price. IN YOUR OPINION r i It upsets me when I hear about schools and communities canceling Halloween celebrations because they are supposedly “satanic” or offensive to some groups, such as Wiccans. For the satanic part, I didn’t learn about how Halloween came from a Celtic belief? that it was the eve of a new year and that the boundaries between the living and dead worlds were at their weakest. The Halloween I learned about was a secular holiday based on the Catholics’ All Saints Day/Eve. All Saints Day is a holiday designed to impress upon children that death is nothing to be scared of, just a normal pan of life. Nothing satanic there. And for offending groups, I feel that this is just like Christmas. For any information on that, just watch the second-greatest “South Park" episode of all time, where the town tries to offend nobody during Christmas — it doesn’t work. So let’s all dress up, enjoy ourselves and have some fun for a night. CHRIS HERRING Second-year criminaljustice student We’ve already paid, so stop charging us I was infuriated to read The Gamecock and see, splashed on the front cover, that parking rates have increased (“Raised garage fees due next month,” Wednesday). It’s one thing to go up on prices, and I could understand if they did so next semester. However, when students have already paid for their garage spaces it is unfair to force them to pay additional money to keep their space. I feel as though I’ve been scammed. Another problem widi parking is that people double-park and receive no fines for it. I’ve called and reported people who were double-parked, and the parking office stated that they wotdd place a ticket on said car, but they never do. If I’m going to pay $180 — now $240 — for a garage space, I expect parking enforcement to ticket the people who take up two spaces! How much can it possibly cost to pay for a new garage? I’m sure the school is turning a big profit out of the parking situation — I can just envision USC parking (or the treasurer) laughing all the way to the bank. What’s next? After we pay this increase, will there be another increase due at a later date? I shall wait and see. Since Herbert Atoms doesn't seen to thirk that $65 is a let, stating “ttet is only $2 a d^r, which is not too bad," I guess he wouldn't mind paying my increased parking payment. CHRISTINA BASS Second-year psychology student Sketch comedy flyer unnecessarily mean While talking with friends in LeConte Monday, I noticed a flyer with a familiar headline copied ont6 the top: “Comedy show suffers mishap.” The reason this headline is so familiar to me is because I cut out that article from The Gamecock when it was printed on Sept. 20. The reason I cut it out was because I was “the woman” referred to in the article. On Sept. 19, I was in the audience of Sunday Night Alive when, purely by accident, the handle of a ceramic vase broke off which sent the vase into the audience, hitting me direcdy on and around my right eye. Miraculously, an eye doctor was in the audience and I was taken immediately to his office where 1 received approximately 30 stitches. It was a totally random incident, and while I wish that it had never happened. My vision is fine and five weeks later the scars are barely visible. I have no hard feelings towards anyone on the cast of SNA. In fact, I have attended every show since and proudly support the cast for the clean yet hilarious comedy show they present every Sunday night. Therefore, it was extremely offensive to me that a group would make light of the situation and uses that particular headline to advertise for their auditions. I cannot put into words the anger that I felt when I saw this flyer and continued to see others around campus. Not only am I offended because I was the one who was hurt in the incident, but also I am offended on behalf of the cast of SNA. I would hate for anyone to be discouraged from attending SNA simply because of seeing that flyer on which the headline and the accompanying comments were placed completely out of context. I do wish that whoever is in charge of their advertising would try to be more tasteful in their method of grabbing attention in the future, instead of exploiting for their own benefit an event that was indeed misfortunate, but that had no serious consequences. I feel that if anyone truly does have the right to mock SNA, I do, and I have no desire whatsoever to do so. Whoever came up with the idea for this flyer should be ashamed. CHELSEY KARNS First-year English student f Check out Maurice Bessinger’s online column on student activism at www.dailygamecock.com . Submission Policy Letters to the editor should be less than 300 words and include name, phone number, professional title or year and major, if a student. E-mail letters to gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. Letters will be edited. Anonymous letters will not be published. Call the newsroom at 777 7726 for more information. Bush true to his word in war on terrorism ■ We can’t trust John Kerry to keep America safe from ai Qaeda The presidential election is less than a week away, and I am voting to re-elect President George W. Bush. Both candidates are patriots and would do their I-- best to serve and j: protect our great | country. The debates arise when you begin to discuss the actions needed to 1_| bring about the goals both RAY candidates desire. LEMOINE The primary issue of this NEBRASKAN election is the war on terror. The most fundamental job of the government is to provide security for its people. Make no mistake. Despite what the pundits on both sides are telling you, either candidate would aggressively pursue al Qaeda across the globe. The question is: Who will do it better? I think Bush has done a great job in unprecedented circumstances. No one could have anticipated the challenges his administration would have to face. There was no playbook for this war on terror. Kerry’s assertion that U.S. action must pass a “global test” is ridiculous. Kerry later claimed this was a misstatement on his pan, but it speaks to his mindset. The United Nations cannot be relied upon to safeguard the security of the United States. One has to look no further than the genocide in Darfur to see the United Nation’s impotence. Domestically, one of Kerry’s big failures is his refusal to disavow partial birth abortion. This brutal practice was successfully banned by the Bush administration with the help of the U.S. Congress. Bush is a strong leader. He makes the tough decisions, and he sticks with what he knows is right. It doesn’t matter to him what national polls seem to say. He doesn’t get carried away in the ebb and flow of world opinion. Bush knows the difference between right and wrong. This is why he is able to clearly define the axis of evil. It is this moral clarity that makes the media elites hate him so much. This same moral clarity makes me admire him. I am going to vote for Bush because I relate to the way he approaches his job as president. I know Bush might not always tell me v/hat I want to hear, but he does tell it the way he sees it. I don’t get the same feeling from Kerry. Kerry seems like the kind of person who will tell me anything to get my vote. He seems to tell me all the things he thinks I want to hear. I don’t want a president who waffles along with the uncertainties of poll numbers. I want a president who will lead resolutely in uncertain times. Bush has set the correct agenda to win the war on terror, and he will lead us resolutely to its successful conclusion. This doesn’t mean Bush is my dream candidate. On the contrary, I wish Bush would do certain things better. There is no doubt the intelligence in Iraq has been a disaster, both before and after the war. I don’t blame Bush for this, but I am also surprised more people weren’t held accountable for these failures. I wish the president would be quicker to react in situations like this, quicker to initiate needed reforms. But it is not a perfect world, and there are no perfect candidates. For my vote, however, Bush is the best man for the job. His moral clarity and firm leadership • will guide the United States successfully through the uncertain times of our brave new world. ONLINE POLL Will you vote on Nov. 2? Yes 91% No 7% Undecided 2% _ FROM WWW OA11.YGAMECOCK.COM