The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, July 14, 2004, Page 5, Image 5
Online.PolI the gamecock ♦ Wednesday, July h 2004 - Online.Poll.Results 5 ■
Do you agree with the Philippines’ decision ~l 1,1 ~L"TTT" "l \ ~| \ "T" ^ I 1 ^1 Do you think USC should close down two-year
to pull its troops out of Iraq? I li . \l\l I " I II \1 I satellite campuses? 29% Yes 59% No
www.dailygamecock.com -LJ—A ? T J_ Vy J—1 J_ K—/ 12% We have campuses in space?
IN OUR OPINION
Terrorism not a
political device
The unexpected defeat of Spain’s incumbent Populist
party after the March 11th Madrid train bombing was
the first instance of a government losing power because
of its support for the war in Iraq; too, this loss seemed a
statement about the power of terrorism. The Philippine
government decision on Monday to pull out its troops in
exchange for Filipino hostage Angelo dela Cruz
resounds with a similar message about terrorism — it
works.
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge is
investigating measures needed to delay November’s
election in response to “credible reports” terrorists will
target America during the elections. Since 9/11, our
nation has heard much about the people who hate our
freedom and how our people cannot let this hatred
interfere with our way of life. Yet the Bush
administration doesn’t view a delay of the democratic
right to vote as “giving in” to terrorists.
It would be foolhardy to think delaying the elections
doesn’t give power to the terrorists. Whether one agrees
with the war in Iraq, we can all agree terrorism
shouldn’t be condoned or accommodated, and barring a
major catastrophe, the elections should proceed as
scheduled. After all, voting is the American way.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
STAFF
Editor in Chief
Steven Van Haren
News Editor
Michael LaForgia
Viewpoints Editor
Paige Haggard
The Mix Editor
Megan Treacy
Sports Editor
Brad Senkiw
Photo Editor
Melissa Wallace
Page Designers
Erin Cline,
Chaz McCarthy
Copy Editors
Tracy Bealer,
Joel Wallace
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
Scott Lindberg
Faculty Advisor
Erik Collins
Advertising Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Creative Director
Susan King
Business Manager
Carolyn Griffin
Classified Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
AdRep
Jesica Johnson
Production Manager
Patrick Bergen
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@gwm.sc.edu
News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@gwm.sc.edu
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of
the University of South Carolina and is
published Monday, Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and spring semesters and
nine times during the summer with the
exception of university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in The
Gamecock are those of the editors or author
and not those of the University of South
Carolina. The Board of Student Publications
and Communications is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The Department of Student
Media is the newspaper's parent
organization. The Gamecock is supported in
part by student activities fees. One free
copy per reader. Additional copies may be
purchased for one dollar each from the
Department of Student Media.
CARTOON COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
GQ IQ is higher than Cosmo's
ANNA C. HUNTLEY
GAMECOCKOPINIONS@GWM.SC.EDU
Because of America’s pimp-over
ho culture, where women remain
secretaries to male executives, I
purchased magazines—microcosms
of pop culture whose glossy pages
color Americana—to document the
differences between men’s
magazines and women’s magazines
that support the discrepancies in
attitude toward men and women. The
sample subjects of choice were GQ
and Esquire versus Cosmopolitan
and Complete Woman.
On the cover of GQ, Will Ferrell
mimicked the sultry stare models
flaunt in Versace ads, parodying the
sex-laden covers of women’s
magazines. Printed beside the
fashionably coiffed poodle Ferrell
was clutching was a tagline for a
piece about San Francisco’s mayor.
Accordingly, the content of GQ’s
stories ranged from intelligent
humor to political examination. The
character depiction of San
Francisco’s mayor, who had ignited
nationwide controversy by
permitting gay marriage within his
city was juxtaposed against an
interview with an art-house British
comedian.
Esquire’s articles were similarly
well crafted. One article recounted
the 1988 rescue of a diver trapped 230
feet underwater, neatly spliced with
the story of the sunken German U
boat the diver had been
investigating. And in true men’s
magazine fashion was the requisite
political article, a Democrat
freshman congressman quickly
rising to become Capitol Hill’s creme
de la creme.
The articles were worthy ot
inclusion in The Atlantic Monthly,
which was not what I found within
the women’s magazines.
The “slutty tales of top stars,” “7
foods that go straight to your thighs,”
and the “great panty debate," in
which guys decided whether boy
briefs or thongs were the sexier
undergarment, came courtesy of
Cosmopolitan. With the writing style
of its articles replete with words like
“sooo” and “scoop” and “vacay,” and
with phrases like “down there
shockers” and “so-fab,” Cosmo
expected women readers to possess a
junior high mentality.
This was only Kool-Aid and hors
d’oeuvres for Complete Woman’s
tasty dishing: “frisky, fun” Paris
Hilton, “how to be this summer’s It
girl,” and how to “lose 5 lbs. in one
week! "And that was just the cover.
Inside the magazine, I learned how to
“marry money,” and how to best
pleasure a guy. It was a veritable
how-to manual on becoming a Barbie
blow-up doll, albeit a rich one.
Nearly 84 years ago, women were
granted the 19th Amendment, ending
all official distinction between
genders, an omen for the apocalypse
of American patriarchy. Yet, pop
culture has subverted long-awaited
equality in the seemingly innocuous
form of monthly magazines, which
teach that American men should be
intelligent risk-takers and well
versed in politics, while women
should be skinny, somewhat stupid,
but just smart enough to manipulate
themselves into a good marriage.
Huntley is a first-year
international studies student.