The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 21, 2004, Page 8, Image 8
ft
O m
r\ r n || t “Ippt don’t really think it
UrUiric.r Gil would be worth the money to keep
Should USC consolidate the buying one every year.”
pharmacy school with MUSC MATT SPARR
in Charleston? first-year business student on why he
vmw.dBHygamecock.com. offered0™ °NE YEARB°°K''USC
Results published Friday. , f jr
In.Our.Opinion
Merger right
for USC, state
Over the past few months, USC President Andrew
Sorensen has been faced with the difficult task of
choosing between long-term growth and prosperity
for the state and kowtowing to parochial interests
in fighting to keep the pharmacy school in
Columbia.
While consolidating the program with the more
research-oriented one in Charleston will displace
students and faculty members, and ruffle some
feathers along the way, he has ultimately made the
best decision in keeping a long-term vision for
Sorensen’s
decision to back
the pharmacy
school merger
shows dedication
to improving the
lives of all South
Carolinians.
x*___• „ J
ouutil ^cu uima.
This question probes at the
very role of a university
president — the promotion of
his school — and while it
might seem that he is trading
away prestige for USC, he does
so with the hope that a greater
iuuuo uu uu v axiu i total tii vv m
bring more jobs to the state, thus increasing the
standard of living and swelling the tax rolls,
ultimately resulting in better qualified in-state
students attending USC.
Furthermore, MUSC already has the research
facilities in place that will allow it to attract
businesses, something the research campus here
will not be able to do effectively for five to 10 years.
No decisions occur in a vacuum, and Sorensen’s
underlines the fact that he understands that for the
university to prosper, so must the rest of South
Carolina. This is no small undertaking, considering
that the state ranks last in many important
educational and economic markers, but this vision
to increase quality of life meshes nicely with Gov.
Mark Sanford’s as well. It would be easy to dismiss
the decision to support the move as political in
nature, and while such calculations always figure
in, these leaders are acting according to what they
believe to be the best for South Carolina.
Should the USC Board of Trustees approve the
merger, it is essential the money saved goes back
into the university’s general fund to be used to aid
our own research efforts.
Gamecock.Corrections
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us
at gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu.
About.The.Gamecock
Editor in Chief
Adam Beam
Copy Desk Chief
Gabrielle Sinclair
Design Director
Shawn Rourk
Asst. Design Director
Staci Jordan
News Editor
Michael LaForgia
Asst. News Editor
Alexis Stratton
Viewpoints Editor
Patrick Augustine
The Mix Editor
Meg Moore
Asst. Mix Editor
Jennifer Sitowski
Sports Editor
U/aa U/aI«a
Asst. Sports Editor
Jonathan Hillyard
Photo Editor
Morgan Ford
Asst. Photo Editor
Johnny Haynes
Page Designers
Erin Cline, Brad Senkiw,
Mary Pinckney Waters,
Chaz McCarthy
Copy Editors
Allyson Bird, Jennifer
Freeman, Jessica Fostei
Steven Van Haren, Joel
Wallace
Wire Editor
Z’Anne Covell
Online Editor
James Tolbert
Senior Writer
Keyin Fellner
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@gwm.sc.edu
News: gamecocknews@gwm.sc.edu
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu
The Mix: gamecockfeatures@gwm.sc.edu
Sports: gamecocksports@.gwm.sc.edu
Public Affairs: gamecockpr@yahoo.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
Editor's Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
Scott Lindenberg
Faculty Adviser
Erik Collins
Creative Director
Susan King
Business Manager
Carolyn Griffin
Advertising Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Classified Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Production Manager
Amber Justice
Creative Services
Whitney Bridges,
Robbie Burkett,
Burke Lauderdale
Advertising Staff
Robert Carli, Kate
Femino, Latoya Hines
Caroline Love, Jesica
Johnson, David
Weatherford
Public Affairs
Kimhprlv Drp«clpr
The Gamecock is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of
the University of South
Carolina. It is t
published Monday.
Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and
spring semesters and
nine timesf during the
summer, with the
exception of university
holidays and exam
periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those of
the editors or author
and not those of the
University of South
Carolina. The Board of
Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Studei
Media is the
newspaper's parent
organization. The
Gamecock is
supported in part by
student-activity fees.
One free copy per
reader. Additional
copies may be
purchased for $1 each
from the Department
of Student Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia. S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
'.Classified: 777-1184
f Fax: 777-6482
^ IRAQI
V
fsm
K^t cmvws
DURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
Suing away our self-respect
Is it just me, or have the
American people gotten a lot
wussier and more whiny in the
last 300 years? We used to be a na
tion of pioneers and minutemen.
Bears? No problem; nothing my
trusty musket can’t dispatch!
Redcoats? Send ‘em back to King
George with a
good ol’
American butt
kicking they
won’t soon for
get.
Nowadays,
just talking
about killing a CURT|SCH0W
bear will get cuRTISCHOW
PETA up in Third-year
' economics
arms, and am- student
bushing the
lobsterbacks is a diplomatic no
no. What is our society coming
to? Men have gone from Davy
Crockett to “Boo-hoo, my estro
gen hurts.” Women have gone
from Dolly Pitcher to “I am wom
an, hear me roar!”
If you tell a man to cowboy up
and be a man. you’re automati
cally labeled as a chauvinist with
subjective and biased views of
what a man should be. I am not
disputing that it is healthy for a
man to be in touch with his feel
ings. I would even endeavor to
propose the ability to confront
something as insubordinate and
irrepressible as human emotion
is a reflection of true masculine
strength.
Nevertheless, being true to
one’s feelings is not permission
to sit around being a whiny
(however sincere) little girl. One
facade of masculinity is being
true to one’s self; another is tak
ing action. From a young age,
boys are now being taught that
a real man is confident in his
own strength and doesn’t need to
fight to prove himself.
This results in superficially
confident boys (who have never
tested and affirmed their strength)
who are deeply insecure, and are
furthermore unwilling to fight for
what they believe in. It is no won
der that grown men simply give
up and move on when the initial
novelty of a relationship wears off,
or when they’ve gotten what they
wanted out of a relationship. It’s
not that men are selfish jerks
(though we can be) as much as
they simply don’t know how to be
a man anymore.
Now we come to the roaring
women — women who have been
damaged by men who don’t know
how to be men. Women have gone
from being affirmed in their fern
ininity and confident in their self
worth to vying for a place in soci
ety to prove themselves; specifi
cally to prove they are equal to
men and thus have as much
worth. The result is that women
are motivated by ambition rather
than the desires of their heart.
They’ve gone from confident
women of sincere action, to loud
insecure fighters of inequality.
The end result is a nation of
whiny and dysfunctional people
in desperate need of tort reform.
No one is actually motivated to
do anything out of sincere will
ingness to get a task accom
plished. Men are unwilling to
take action, and women are fight
ing for equality more than for
the actual cause (creating an
emotional breeding ground for
being whiny).
The solution? Let’s sue stuff!
The United States is the most liti
gious nation in the world today;
men suing for damages that
could have been handled out of
court if both parties would have
been willing to be true to them
selves and confront each other,
and women suing out of senti
ments of inequality. Litigation
is not the solution. People sim
ply need to truly be confident and
find rest in who they are.
In.Your.upimon
Newdow will not
eliminate religion
I am writing in response to
Ryan Holt’s column on the
Pledge of Allegiance case
(“Majority supports Pledge in
schools,” Monday). I ulti
mately agree with him that
Newdow has a long road
ahead of him if he is going to
try and stamp out any hint of
religion in the public forum.
Perhaps Newdow does not un
derstand that he is waging a
battle against an institution
that has seen thousands of
years of struggle and has yet
to fall. The presence of
Christianity, or any religion
for that matter, is everywhere.
Mr. Newdow will find he can
not escape society’s allusion
to deities.
Mr. Newdow will be thrilled
to learn that his daughter will
encounter math and science
in school. Here she will be
faced with formulas and theo
ries that allude to higher be
ings. The number “phi” is a
number that appears every
where in nature. Its origins
and occurrences are so fan
tastic that it has been dubbed
“the divine proportion.” In bi
ology and psychology, his
daughter will likely encounter
study of the temporal lobe,
dubbed “the God module” by
scientists.
In fact, Mr. Newdow’s daugh
ter will not be able to turn a pa
per in without dating it. The
date alone is enough to allude
to a higher power. We are cur
rently in the year 2004 A.D. of
the Gregorian calendar. “A.D.,”
or “anno Domini,” is Latin for
“the year of our Lord.” So even
if Mr. Newdow’s case wins, it
will be documented that he won
in 2004 “of the year of our Lord.”
Mull over that one over for a
while.
So I wish Mr. Newdow the
best of luck in his endeavors.
Why, as a Christian, would I
wish him luck? Because I
know my faith will not be
shaken because a phrase is re
moved from a pledge. And my
children will be raised as
Christians whether they in
clude “under God” in the
pledge when they are in
school. So as they say, Mr.
Newdow, you may win the bat
tle, but you’ll lose the war.
KATHERINE BALLARD
THIRD-YEAR CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Student
Culbertson’s rant
biased, pointless
After reading Graham
Culbertson’s column (“Campus
construction a waste,”
Monday), I feel that I have lost
brain cells by subjecting my
self to such completely point
less ranting and raving.
Besides the fact that
Culbertson’s column had no
main point, he also managed to
attack an entire group of dedi
cated students on this campus.
His random and idiotic com
ments about how there are no
good Greeks on campus are com
pletely biased and untrue.
Greeks contribute to most of
the leadership positions and
honor societies here as well as
raising tens of thousands of dol
lars for the community every
year through service projects.
Culbertson’s statements were
nothing more than the idiotic
rants of a student who obvious
ly has nothing better in his life
to worry about than the actions
of a group of people who are com
pletely secure in who they are.
More progress would be made
if Culbertson used his writing tal
ent to deal with real problems
and solutions instead of just at
tacking a group students based
on their noticeable presence here.
Instead of airing his own bit
terness and insecurities about
his stature on campus,
Culbertson could write some
thing interesting and thought
provoking for a change.
JULIE WALKER
THIRD-YEAR PSYCHOLOGY STUDENT
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less than
300 words and include name, phone
number, professional title or year and
major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@gwm.sc.edu. Letters
will be edited for space, possible libel
and style. Anonymous letters will not be
published. Call the newsroom at 777
7726 for more information.
Students
left out
of merger
discussion
I’m often asked why I chose to
come to USC, all the way from
California. My joke is that I got the
two USCs confused, but I really
chose USC because I wanted a full
college experience.
I wanted football games, beauti
ful old brick buildings, warm
weather and friendly teachers. I
needed a school that valued me for
the contributions that I would
make (and that would show its ap
preciation for me by giving me
scholarships). I also wanted a
□ school where I
could remain for
all six years of
my pharmacy
education, as I
didn’t want to
make friends at
one school, and
then transfer for
MCCLENDON pharmacy
, degree program
Fpharrmaff two years later.
student I wanted a
lot. But the neat
thing is that I got all that and more.
At USC’s College of Pharmacy, I
have a professor who, while trav
eling in California, visited my par
ents to let them know what a good
student I was. When my apartment
uuuucu, cuiu i vyc*o uuuci a wi w
stress, one of the associate deans
took the time to make sure I was
OK. Students in my class celebrate
fellow students’ successes (mar
riages, babies) and pull together
during low points (such as the past
few weeks).
So why are we so upset? There
are plans to merge USC’s and
MUSC’s Colleges of Pharmacy into
one.
It may not sound too bad, and it
may all work for the best, but it
doesn’t appear that way. The prob
lem is that the plan is still in its in
fancy, and many have been left in
the dark about the specifics of what
will happen to pharmacy educa
tion in South Carolina. There are
too many questions remaining, but
the USC Board of Trustees is ex
pected to make a decision soon.
The merger plans are based on a
pharmacy consultant team’s re
port, and the report focuses on
building a great research institu
tion and calls for the inclusion of
distance education in the pharma
cy program (For further informa
tion about the merger and for the
full report, check out www.pro
tectpharmacy.org). I know I would
never want a physician to earn his
degree over the Internet, and I
wouldn’t want my pharmacist to,
either. If the merger goes through,
and distance education becomes a
reality, the landscape of USC could
forever change. Future students
will choose quality education over
a focus on research and distance
education, and will attend school
elsewhere.
If so, the entire university will
suffer. Pharmacy students tend to
hang together, but what you might
not know is that pharmacy stu
dents have contributed a lot to this
university. We serve on the Senate, (
SG Executive Cabinet and
University Committees. We’ve
played music in the USC Marching
Band and were USC cheerleaders.
We are Resident Advisers in your
dorm.
We volunteer for Martin Luther
King Jr. Day of Service, the
Carolina/Clemson blood drive,
Dance Marathon, Habitat for
Humanity and Clean Carolina. The
list could go on, and doesn’t even
begin to include the accomplish
ments of College of Pharmacy’s stu
dent organizations.
If the merger goes through,
students of this high caliber will
choose to go elsewhere, where
their education is more impor
tant than the all-mighty research
dollar. And I won’t blame them,
but I might blame Andrew
Sorensen.
Winners.and.Sinners
SORENSEN Seeks to better the state, and
USC, by consolidating pharmacy college with
MUSC.
HUNLEY FUNERAL Gives us a chance to use
those hoop skirts in the back of our closet.
COLIN POWELL New book paints Secretary of
State as the only Bush cabinet official to
foresee problems invading Iraq.
ARIEL SHARON Israeli Prime Minister’s policy
of assassinating alleged terrorists makes peace
“ unlikely in the Middle East.
GREENE STREET CARS Dinner time at the Russell
House turns Greene Street into a parking lot.
JOHN KERRY 30-year-old statements calling
Vietnam actions an “atrocity” derail
campaigning to win over Florida.