The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, November 17, 2003, Page 4, Image 4
SOUND OFF ONLINE POLL
Create message boards at . Should the Visitor Center
www.dailygamecock.com or move to McKissick museum?
send letters to the editor to www.dailygamecock.com.
gamecockopinions@hotmail.com Results published on Fridays.
i
IN OUR OPINION
Rivalry runs
in our blood
If we learn just one thing from the annual
Carolina-Clemson onslaught, let it be that hate can
be a good thing.
It’s hate that fuels the rivalry dividing the state
into Carolina and Clemson; hate that, every
November, manifests itself into a four-hour spectacle
of raw emotion and energy.
From the 1961 game when USC’s Sigma Nu
fraternity took uniforms from Orangeburg High
School and took the field posing as befuddled Clemson
Stop by the Russell
House this week and let
them drain some of the
garnet out of you.
players to the 2002 game
when Clemson students
used phallic balloon
labeled “Cock” as a
beach ball during the
fourth quarter, the rivalry runs deep in our blood.
For students looking for a way to show their
disgust for Clemson this week, look no further than
the Carolina-Clemson Blood Drive, held in the
Russell House Ballroom.
It’s a simple concept: You hate Clemson and you
want them to lose at everything, so you stop by the
Russell House and donate some of your blood to
make sure the Carolina student body gives more
than Clemson’s.
As a bonus, the real winners are the people the
blood goes to save. It’s kind of ironic that such a
bitter rivalry can be a lifesaver.
So, if you want to show your school spirit this week,
stop by the Russell House and let them drain some of
the garnet out of you. And don’t forget to wear your
“Clemson sucks” T-shirt to the game on Saturday.
College Quote Board
THE ORACLE
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
“As the ‘corporate vision’ in
cludes ‘a People Vision — to be
the best employer in each com
munity around the world,’ ac
cording to the McDonald’s Web
site, maybe the fast-food giant
would be better off changing
some things in their own loca
tions. Rather than complaining
about the usage of ‘McJob,’ the
corporation needs to offer better
wages in order to stray from the
stained image.”
DAILY TARGUM
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
“If a mother feels perfectly
comfortable exposing herself in
order to administer precious nu
trition to her child, she should
have the right to do as much.
And when they insist on being
fed, babies will not wait for a
more convenient location.
Indeed, who could ever expect
them to consider their mother’s
discreetness above their
hunger?”
GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
In Friday’s police report, Quanda Jefferson should have been
listed as the subject in crime number seven.
The Gamecock regrets the error.
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us
at gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Editor in Chief
Charles Tomlinson
Managing Editor
Adam Beam
News Editor
Michael LaForgia
Asst. News Editor
Alexis Stratton
Viewpoints Editor
Gabrielle Sinclair
The Mix Editor
Meg Moore
Sports Editor
Brad Senkiw
Asst. Sports Editor
Wes Wolfe
Photo Editor
Morgan Ford
Head Page Designer
Shawn Rourk
Page Designers
Justin Bajan, Staci
Jordan. Philip Whitehe
Slot Copy Editors
Amy Genoble, Tricia
Ridgway. Mary Pinckn
Waters
Copy Editors
Jessica Foster, Stevet
Van Haren
Online Editor
James Tolbert
Public Affairs
Kimjerly Dressier
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
News: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@hotmail.com
The Mix: gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Public Affairs: gckpublicaffairs@hotmail.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
Editor's Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
Scott Lindenberg
Faculty Adviser
Erik'Collins
Creative Director
SusarvKing
Business Manager
Carolyn Griffin
Advertising Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Classified Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Production Manager
Amber Justice
ad
Creative Services
Whitney Bridges,
Robbie Burkett,
ey Sean O'Meara
Advertising Staff
John Blackshire,
Adam Bourgoin, Ben
Sinclair, Jesica
Johnson, Ryan
Gorman, Laytoya
Hines
The Gamecock is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of
the University of South
Carolina. It is
published Monday,
Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and
spring semesters and
nine times during the
summer, with the
exception of university
holidays and exam
periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those of
the editors or author
and not those of the
University of South
Carolina. The Board of
Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Media is the
newspaper’s parent
organization. The
Gamecock is
supported in part by
student-activity fees.
One free copy per
reader. Additional
copies may be
purchased for $1 each
from the Department
of Student Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
^Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
'YoO SrtiNe YoUR eeACoM, T'LL SrtiNe /AiNef '
CARTOON COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
How far have women come?
RACHAL HATTON
GAMECOCKOPINIONS@HOTMAIL.COM
Females finally shatter
the glass ceiling.
Home to good football and
dirty politics, my home state of
Louisiana is best known for great
food, David Duke and Louis the
Kingfish. Lately, we have a pro
gressive reason to be proud.
Louisiana just elected its first
woman governor, Kathleen
Babineaux Blanco. She won with
52 percent of the vote. A former
stay-at-home mother of six chil
dren as well as a high school
teacher, she has served in public
office for the past 20 years, eight
as lieutenant governor.
Her platform consists of a
“scandal-free past” — big news
in Louisiana. As governor, she
hopes to expand kindergartens,
increase teacher pay and attract
more business to Louisiana.
Finally, women are getting
somewhere. This proves that
children don’t keep us from
achieving. It proves we can stay
at home and then step back in.
We no longer have to settle for
the “mommy track.” We can be
mothers, strong women and so
cial leaders if we choose. Women,
listen. The glass ceiling of public
office is shattering like a beer bot
tle on 1-26.
Or is it? We need more stories
like the one above, and less like
the one below. Read onward, dear
friend.
A 14-year-old Texan girl who
appeared on Maury Povich’s talk
show centered around the theme
of “Out-of-Control Teens” is su
ing the show. Her premise? She
was instructed to act more
promiscuous and provocative
than normal.
That’s not the shocker, even.
Her mother was promised that
the girl would receive counsel
ing, transportation and lodging
if the girl were to appear on the
show. After the girl’s appear
ance, an unidentified man pos
ing as the show’s limo driver
stepped in, told the girl she was
pretty and offered to show her
the town.
He then drove her to a seclud
ed location and raped her.
Show spokesmen claim that
even if the girl was raped, the
lawsuit is faulty because the al
leged rapist is in no way affiliated
with “The Maury Povich Show.”
So what if he’s not affiliated
with the show? The point is that
she was a minor under their
care. She shouldn’t have had the
opportunity to be in such a posi
tion. And the worst part is that
most likely the show, and the
rapist, will get off scot-free, just
like the majority of “low-profile”
rape cases.
So what is really the state of
women in the United States?
What does it mean that women
today can hold public offices, out
eam their partners, have stay-at
home husbands and have a great
level of social mobility? What do
these improvements mean if we
can still be so intimately violat
ed and have little to no legal re
course?
Forgive my rhetorical ques
tions. Women have gained social
privileges in leaps and bounds
over the past 30 or so years, but
we’re far from equal status. Until
we don’t have to fear such viola
tions and such attacks are not
legally permitted, women won’t
get the message that they’re re
ally socially valued.
Just holding important offices
and changing policy and dis
course is not enough. It’s our ev
eryday lives that see the most
problems, and it’s there we have
to help make changes.
Hatton is a third-year women's
studies student.
IN YOUR OPINION
Augustine makes
poor assumptions
I am writing in response to
Patrick Augustine’s Nov. 14
column about the war with
Iraq.
Patrick, I hope you under
stand the implications of this
war. First of all, the U.S. gov
ernment is not fighting for free
dom, it is fighting to give Iraq
a strategic advantage in an eco
nomic area where we lose.
Plain and simple.
The media are just trying to
get this point across, and I
think the Pentagon, the White
House and the appropriate sec
retaries have done their fair
share to censor the material
we see coming out of Iraq.
If you need any clarification,
please refer to Bush’s latest
plan to ban any broadcast of the
dead returning to America in
coffins. You can find the story
at www.washingtonpost.com.
The Jessica Lynch story is
being told in the media more
to establish a new jingoism in
America than to quell opin
ions about the war.
I would like to leave you
with a few words: War is
peace; freedom is slavery; ig
norance is strength.
PETER COOLIDGE
SECOND-YEAR BIOLOGY AND
SOCIOLOGY STUDENT
Offer solutions
when you complain
This letter is in response to
Bysshe Easton’s letter in the
Nov. 7 issue of The Gamecock.
The one type of person I hate
most is the guy who complains
about everything, from “injus
tices” done^to him to what so
ciety “owes1 him to the quality
of an event, service or institu
tion with which he interacts
regularly and voluntarily —
and doesn’t even offer his in
put on how to fix the problem.
My last encounter with such
an undesirable and unproduc
tive citizen came when I read
a letter to the editor from
Bysshe Easton — a student
who has recently decided that
his venerable wisdom cannot
be compromised by reading an
“amateur” paper.
Easton may have addressed
a completely valid concern in
his letter to The Gamecock last
week, but by the end of his dia
tribe, I didn’t see how he
planned to help out the alleged
"poor writing” dilemma that
apparently plagues The
Gamecock staff.
Maybe he was just venting,
or maybe he was trying to sell
you some of his six-dollar
words (ie.: “egregious” instead
of “bad”) to use in your paper.
But I’m not buying it, and nei
ther should anyone else.
People like Easton should
have to pay to complain be
cause they don’t offer any
thing in return for their con
stant moaning. You see?
There’s my solution to a prob
lem — charge for finding fault
without offering some type of
assistance. It makes sense that
Easton is a philosophy student
— he raises questions but
doesn’t offer any answers.
Anyway, while Easton
laments the crisis of the paper
and memorizes the dictionary,
I will offer publicly my time
and energy to The Gamecock, a
publication of merit in which
I witness none of the supposed
writing or editing issues. My
position? Official complaint
fee collector.
So, Easton and all ofyou
other whiners out there, try to
contribute ideas on how to end
your suffering. After all, you ob
viously know everything.
WHIT ASHLEY
FIRST-YEAR LIBERAL ARTS STUDENT
Let your voice be
heard.
Be part of your
democratic
system.
Get your name in
print.
gamecodkoptaioES
@jh©tmaiLG©m
‘‘■'V *
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less than
300 words and include name, phone
number, professional title or year and
major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
Letters will be edited. Anonymous letters
will not be published. Call the newsroc^n
at 777-7726 for more information.
Credible
reviews
are hard
to find
MATHIEU DEFLEM
GAMECOCKOPINIONS@HOTMAIL.COM
SG-sponsored site lacks
objectivity, validity.
Considering Student Govern
ment’s endorsement of the Web
site TeacherReviews.com, there
are many problems involved
with the use of such an online
service.
While we should always en
courage open dialogue among stu
dents and teachers in evaluating
one another’s performance, re
linquishing control to a private
Web site outside of USC may not
be the best way to foster useful
learning conditions.
Forgoing personal contacts
among students to get information
on their teachers, students using
the site enter an impersonal sys
tem that is deprived of any sense
of a common commitment to the
learning process.
A privately owned Web site
system not only represents a gen
eralized system of distrust, it is
redundant.
The departments in our uni
versity use teacher evaluations
which come with much better
control mechanisms than any
private Web site could offer. Our
evaluations are regulated by
USC’s policies and procedures
and are legally controlled by the
state of South Carolina. While
our system might not be perfect,
we ought to implement it the best
way we can and change it where
we see fit.
It could be proposed, for in
stance, to report the summary
statistics of the current evalua
tions via the university server.
Likewise, teachers in the uni
versity ought to be encouraged
to develop their Web pages and
offer educational materials for
their students.
A central problem with
TeacherReviews.com is that
there is no quality control and
no accountability. On the con
trary, the TeacherReviews.com
Web site comes with a long list
of disclaimers, including that the
contents is offered “on an ‘as is’
basis” and that “no representa
tions or warranties of any kind”
are implied.
The site owner even specifies
that he makes “no claims or rep
resentations as to the accuracy,
completeness or truth of any ma
terial” on the Web site.
Worse yet, tne owner ot
TeacherReviews.com adds a le
galistic disclaimer that “under no
circumstances will Teacher
Reviews.com be liable for direct,
indirect, incidental or any other
type of damages” resulting from
using the Web site. Some service!
Then what is the value of T-shirts
and stickers that advertise for
such a site?
Can students only expect SG to
adopt strategies that are “cost-ef
fective” without an attempt to ap
peal to faculty and the universi
ty administration tq collaborate
on planning useful educational
tools? Or can and should students
expect qualified and committed
teachers and the very best efforts
from their university to foster an
environment of learning?
There is an intrinsic value to
education without third-party in
terference.
Students should expect the
best from their teachers, as
much as teachers expect the
same from their students.
Resigning to an online, Web
based system that is not part of
our university will surely not be
the best way to attain our educa
tional goals.
Students and teachers should
make their own university, not
rely on others do it for them.
Deflemis art assistant professor
in the sociology department.