The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 29, 2003, Page 6, Image 6
® THE GAMECOCK ♦ Wednesday, October 29, 2003
SOUNDOFF TTT^TTTTl/^TATmCi ONLINEPOLL
Create message boards at I 1-4 1 /1 / I_JI II \ I Should creationism be included in
www.dailygamecock.com or | I i i ■/ m/ I I ■ | I I l college biology textbooks?
send letters to the editor to IliWW I \ / I 1 ll Ik/ www.dailygamecock.com.
gamecockopinions@hotmail.com J —4—^4 w * —4— —4— A 1 —I— Results published on Fridays.
, IN OUR OPINION
Parkingfix
is misguided
We commend our Student Government for making
efforts to solve the never-ending parking issue.
Today, however, SG will vote on a resolution that
suggests changes to the process by which students
reserve garage spots — and the resolution’s
proposals could do more harm than good.
Stemming from a regular decrease in parking and
the eternal struggle between Parking Services and
the students, the proposal includes giving priority to
upperclassmen — defined as everyone but freshmen
— whnlivpnnramnns Thp
This proposal would
place off-<campus
upperclassmen,
who need reliable
parking more than
anyone, secondary,
and that is illogical.
resolution would place off
campus upperclassmen,
who need reliable parking
more than anyone,
secondary, and that is
illogical.
Purranflv ohirlonfc pan
reserve their spots forfce next semester. There is no
reason to stop this, as the resolution suggests.
Shuffling all of the garage assignments every semester
instead of letting students renew would only make the
system more complex.
The proposed resolution is surely driven by noble
motives, and it does contain some good ideas, such as
limiting students to one decal. But if passed by USC
Parking Director Derrick Huggins, it would serve only
to complicate and perhaps worsen the current system.
SG needs to take Ihe time to sit down and think
. this flawed resolution through.
Winners and Sinners
MERCI RETRIEVER New device might save the
lives of stroke patients.
TOM PETTY AND THE HEARTBREAKERS Win
coveted Radio Music Award. Maybe they can
melt it down to make something nice.
GAS PRICES Down 16 cents per gallon from a
month ago. Don’t go spending it all at once, now.
CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES 600,000 acres
consumed, 17 people killed. It doesn’t look to be
slowing down.
DANGEROUS ASSAULT MAN Released man
charged with kidnapping and assault is reported
lurking around campus; posted description
inspires countless Halloween costumes.
P. DIDDY Accused of using sweatshop labor for
his line of clothing.
GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us
at gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
tailor in unier
Charles Tomlinson
Managing Editor
Adam Beam
News Editor
Michael LaForgia
Asst. News Editor
Alexis Stratton
Viewpoints Editor
Gabrielle Sinclair
The Mix Editor
Meg Moore
Sports Editor
Brad Senkiw
Asst. Sports Editor
Wes Wolfe
Photo Editor
Morgan Ford
Head Page Designer
Shawn Rourk
Page Designers
Justin Bajan, Samantha
Hall, Staci Jordan, Philip
Whitehead
Slot Copy Editors
Amy Genoble. Tricia
Ridgway, Mary Waters
Copy Editors
Jessica Foster, Steven
Van Haren
Online Editor
James Tolbert
Public Affairs
Kimberly Dressier
UUNTAUI INrUKmAMUfi
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
News: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@hotmail.com
The Mix: gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Public Affairs: gckpublicaffairs@hotmail.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
Editor’s Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
Scott Lindenberg
Faculty Adviser
Erik Collins
Creative Director
Susan King
Business Manager
Carolyn Griffin
Advertising Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Classified Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Production Manager
Amber Justice
Creative Services
Whitney Bridges,
Robbie Burkett,
Sean O’Meara
Advertising Staff
John Blackshire,
Adam Bourgoin, Ben
Sinclair, Jesica
Johnson, Ryan
Gorman, Laytoya
Hines
The Gamecock is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of
the University of South
Carolina. It is
published Monday,
Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and
spring semesters and
nine times during the
summer, with the
exception of university
holidays and exam
periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those of
the editors or author
and not those of the
University of South
Carolina. The Board of
Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Media is the
newspaper’s parent
organization. The
Gamecock is
supported in part by
student-activity fees.
One free copy per
reader. Additional
copies may be
purchased for $1 each
from the Department
of Student Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene St.
Columbia, S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
?>; \ : , . <%
W^TiT
FEELS
LiKe _
• •-. m
CARTOON COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
Awards shows hit a new low
DAVID STAGG
GAMECOCKOPINIONS@HOTMAIL.COM
Categories border on
the idiotic this year.
I can’t seem to get over some of
the awards shows television is
broadcasting. This time, it was
NBC showing the Radio Music
Awards, which featured a myriad
of performers, famous presenters
and idols everyone secretly can’t
even bear to look at but will give
standing ovations for anyway.
What gets me isn’t the massive
amount of celebrities they can
gather in one room at a time.
It’s not how they can get Tim
McGraw, Nelly, P. Diddy and
Murphy Lee to perform on the
same stage (at different times, of
course, but after Diddy’s newest
collaboration with Lenny
Kravitz, Lord knows what he’s
going to do next).
It’s not even how the audience
gave a standing ovation for near
ly every performance, save a se
lect few. (Michelle Branch, I love
you, but it looked like you spent a
little too much time carousing
with Diddy before you went on.)
What gets me are the wacky
categories they dream up. I say to
myself, “Self, it’s a radio show.”
Other times, I say, “Self, they’ve
got to keep the audience en
gaged.” And yet other times, I say,
“Self, you really need to take the
trash out before the house Starts
to smell. And also, look into hir
ing a maid to wash the dishes.
Because dish-washing is no good.”
Let’s review: One of the two
striking categories this year was
“Best Driving Song.” How are you
going to accurately count votes for
“Best Driving Song?” What on
earth even constitutes a driving
song? One you could sing along to?
If so, I guess it only makes sense
that “Shake Ya Tailfeather” won.
In fact, I can’t even begin to de
scribe how appropriate this is.
Just last week, I was driving in
my car to get to work when the
song came on the radio. Not only
did I crank the volume, but I also
put the cruise control on, jumped
up in my seat, threw my rear end
out the driver’s-side window and
shook my tailfeather like it was
going out of style. Definitely the
best song to drive to.
So that category didn’t tickle
your fancy, huh? Well, thank God
it’s an awards show because I’ll
be darned if there isn’t another
one that is just as hilarious.
Striking category number two:
“Best Hook-Up Song.” Not only
did they get Nick “I Wear the
Pants” Lachey and Molly “I
Ended Up on the TV Show ‘Las
Vegas’ What Happened To Me”
Sims, but they also GAVE THE
AWARD TO JEWEL.
I can’t tell you how many times
that’s happened. In fact, just last
week, I was out late getting down
with some friends when I met this
girl. We kind of hit it off, and I
asked her to come back to my
home. We headed back and I lit
some candles, turned the lights
down low and went to the trusty
stereo to put on the perfect song
for the mood. I turned up the vol
ume, hit play and “FOLLOW
YOUR HEAAAAAART, YOUR IN
TUIIISHUUUNN! ”
She didn’t just cry; she rained
cats and dogs.
But I guess that’s just the life
we, as Americans, live. I can’t
wait for next year. We’ll have
Best Song to Wash Your Car To
While Simultaneously Washing
Your Hair Because You Haven’t
Showered In Three Days Because
You Haven’t Had Time Even
Though Last Night You Could
Have But Decided Watching
Another Awards Show Was More
Important.
Stagg is a third-year media arts
student.
IN YOUR OPINION
Eliminate religion
to solve problems
We have come upon a great
moment in this country, and we
must not allow it to pass unno
ticed. In short, a revolution is
available, and we must not let it
abandon us. I am, of course, talk
ing about the separation of
church and state. Going before
the Supreme Court this term is a
case involving the Pledge of
Allegiance; earlier this year was
the story of a State Supreme
Court Judge setting up a
monument for the Ten
Commandments (so much for
the “no graven images”), not to
mention the many other in
stances of government and reli
gious faith colliding. It is time a
decision be made once and for
all. My suggestion is fair and
constitutional (assuming an
other amendment were added).
I suggest all religion be out
ixiweu. tyc, ui uiiowuiiuj(,uavc
for too long allowed religion and
its morality to interfere in the
free flow of capital. Capitalism
cannot continue with the moral
chains that religion has tied
around its neck, limiting its
freedom and in the process lim
iting our own. Capitalism has
no morality because the market
has none. It is time that we end
the hypocrisy and state openly
. to the world that the United
States will no longer abide by
the rules of the zealots. We have
seen the damage caused by the
religious fundamentalists —
and all religions are fundamen
talist, since all have fundamen
tal rules that allow its followers
to say they belong to X and not
Y. How many must die for us to
finally be fed up?
The first step would be a se
vere tax placed upon all reli
gious organizations. This tax
would bring billions into the
coffers of the U.S. government
and would easily allow for the
funding of wars necessary for
the expansion of the market.
The second step would be an
outright elimination of all reli
gions. Those concerned about
funding need not worry. The in
crease in police needed for such
an elimination could easily be
provided for by those now as
signed to drug duty because
drugs, freed from the moral fin
ger wagging, would now be le
gal and those employed in
paramilitary groups (S.W.A.T)
could easily switch duties, not
to mention the increase of cap
ital that would follow such an
increase in consumer freedom.
Our time is now. We have
nothing to lose but our chains.
SID LITTLEFIELD
GRADUATE STUDENT IN
PHILOSOPHY
Don’t belittle the
Supreme Court
Ryan Holt made grossly er
roneous statements in his arti
cle (“Losing faith in Supreme
Court,” Wednesday) that need
correcting.
First, he said that the federal
judiciary has historically used
strict constructionism. I’m
guessing that he’s never taken
any class in Supreme Court de
cisions because if he had, he’d
know that, in countless cases,
the Court has strayed from a
“strict word-for-word perspec
tive”: Marbury (1803) establish
es judicial review on less than
explicit standards; Flast (1968)
lets taxpayers sue the federal
government without overt au
thority; McCulloch (1819) estab
lishes implicit powers; Baren
blatt (1959) permits Senate in
vestigations without express
doctrine; and Neagle (1890) allows
the President leeway stemming
from the imprecise “take care”
clause. Do I need to continue? The
Court has consistently used other
methods to. interpret the
Constitution, so his assertion of
“loose” construction being a most
ly recent phenomenon misrepre
sents the Court’s history.
Holt misrepresented other facts
as well. The Fifth Amendment,
which he says “coerces” officers to
state a person’s rights, was inter
preted that way precisely to pre
vent officers from “coercing” de
tainees into giving up their “word
for-word” rights. Also, the Pledge
of Allegiance did not contain the
phrase “under God” until 1954.
Lastly, no one should hastily
belittle the judicial branch be
cause, without its judicial review,
this country would have swung
far away from its constitutional
foundations. Sure they’ve made
controversial decisions, but
they’re the onlv bodv able to ef
fectively keep the government
from overstepping the constitu
tion. This country would be in
shambles without judicial ac
tivism, which has been happen
ing throughout our history.
Remember, Mr. Holt, just be
cause some highly educated peo
ple with power and experience
don’t agree with your interpreta
tion of the Constitution, it doesn’t
mean they’re wrong. And in the
future, do us all a favor and give
us real opinions instead of half
baked rants.
ELIZABETH BAKANIC
SECOND-YEAR LIBERAL ARTS
STUDENT
Submission Policy
, Letters to the editor should be less than
300 words and include name, phone
number, professional title or year and
major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
Letters will be edited. Anonymous letters
will not be published. Call the newsroom
at 777-7726 for more information.
Attacks
in Iraq
recall
Vietnam
f
WES WOLFE
GAMECOCKOPINIONS@HOTMAIL.COM
War shows that history
really does repeat itself.
Now can we officially call
President Bush’s venture into
Iraq a complete failure?
Sunday, a rocket attack against
the headquarters of the American
occupation killed an Army colonel '
from North Carolina and wound
ed 18 people. A Baghdad deputy
mayor was also assassinated in a
drive-by shooting on Sunday.
On Monday, 35 people, includ
ing one U.S. soldier, died in four
different attacks in Baghdad. Six
more soldiers were included
among the 230 wounded. The
guerillas targeted the Red Cross
and three Iraqi police stations.
This is in addition to more than
100 Americans who have died
since the war was declared over
Mav 1 As of now mnrp Amprirans
have died during the “peace” in
Iraq than during open warfare.
People have said rebuilding
Iraq would be like rebuilding
Germany or Japan following
World War II. That rosy scenario
simply isn’t happening in Iraq. 1
Back in May on an episode of the
CNN show “Crossfire,” commen
tator James Carville said that Iraq
would be like Vietnam. I like
Carville quite a bit, but I thought
he was nuts. Vietnam? We had just
gone in and swept aside the Iraqi
army, and it wouldn’t be long be
fore we could start rebuilding the
country. I figured the rebuilding
would get fouled up, but not in
such a horrible way that it would
merit comparisons to Vietnam.
Well, Bush and Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and
all the rest of the screw-ups in the
Bush administration really put us
in a pickle this time. More
Americans are getting killed in
Iraq, and things don’t look even ,
close to getting better — they’re
getting worse, and we’re sending
$87 billion to that money pit in the
desert.
So, Carville was right after all.
It’s looking like Vietnam.
Hearing officials from the White
House say “victory is just
around the corner,” and watch
ing more attacks on major build
ings in Baghdad sends me back
to history class.
nn hnrl /Mrnn
JL1* U LllJ
ed war hero Sen. John Kerry is
comparing the Iraq quagmire to
Vietnam. In an AP article Monday,
Kerry said: “This sounds frighten
ingly like the ‘light at the end of the
tunnel’ rhetoric of Vietnam. Every
day, the White House’s excuses be
come more insulting to our troops
on the ground.”
Monday’s attack showed how
little American authority in Iraq
has been able to secure the capi
tal. The attacks on what should
have been safely-guarded facili
ties by the simple will of the
guerillas is reminiscent of the
Viet Cong attacks against U.S.
forces in South Vietnam.
When will Bush and his cronies
uiai uu uicuici nuw mum
money we put into fixing the coun
try, it won’t happen? We can’t risk
the lives and the money it takes to
put the pieces of Iraq back togeth
er while fighting off attacks from
everyone in the country who has a
beef with the U.S.
Five or 10 years from now,
when hundreds of American lives ,
will have been lost and nothing
gained, we’ll pull out of Iraq and
try to learn a couple lessons. It’s
too bad we didn’t stop all this be
fore it started.
So, here’s to you, Georgie boy.
Back in 2000,1 said, “Well, he
can’t do that much harm to
America in four years, can he?” I
guess I was wrong.
Wolfe is a fourth-year public
relations ^uderit.