The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 06, 2003, Page 4, Image 4
4 THE GAMECOCK ♦ Monday, October 6, 2003
SOUND OFF ONLINE POLL
Create message boards at ' Should the College of Liberal Arts and
www.dailygamecock.com or the College of Math and Science merge?
send letters to the editor to www.dailygamecock.com.
gamecockapinions@hotmail.com Results published on Fridays.
IN OUR OPINION
Amend, the
SG plan first
With money so scarce, Student Government
shouldn’t be hasty to use all of what we have without
taking sufficient time and effort to thoroughly
research and include all students’ perspectives.
The Student Senate will vote Wednesday on
whether to pass a plan formed by the executive staff
to use money from excess student activity fees.
Senators need to take charge and amend plans for
this year’s spending.
The student
Senate must
amend this plan
before approving
it. SG should go
back to the
drawing board if
necessary.
The money> which totals
about $190,000, can only be
spent one time. This is a
remarkable and welcome
opportunity to SG to finally
make a real, lasting difference.
But the current plan is not
perfect. It is hypocritical for SG
to say it will not return funds to
student organizations but then proceed to allocate
funds to WUSC, the Alpha Phi Omega escort service
and the Sexual Health Awareness and Rape
Prevention. If the money goes to one organization, it
should go back to all. SG must be consistent.
The Readership Program is a great investment and
needs funding. And lighting on Greene Street has
been an issue with students for years and a recurring
theme in SG.
But $6,000 is way too much to spend on gigantic 14
foot signs with maps of the campus. Those signs will
serve more as an eyesore than a lighthouse. That
money, along with the money planned to go to the
three student organizations, could be given to further
extend the readership project or help with the
lighting project.
The Student Senate must amend this plan before
approving it. SG should go back to the drawing board
if necessary. SG has an amazing opportunity. They
shouldn’t squander it by spreading themselves too
thin.
. GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
In Wednesday’s The Mix, the review of Dressy Bessy’s self-titled
album should have credited Wes Wolfe as the writer.
A graphic on Wednesday’s front page should have said Student
Government’s activity-fee surplus was $190,000.
In an article in Friday’s paper, a quote by provost Jerry Odom
should have said, “Any tinie you have a meeting like that, the
people opposed to it are the ones who will show up.”
A story in Friday’s paper about parking and shuttles should
have credited the policy changes to Parking Services.
Information in the last paragraph of Friday’s USC inn story
should have been attributed to Bob McAlister instead of Toby Ward.
Friday’s USC inn story should have specified it was referring to
the U.S. Justice Department in the second-to-last paragraph.
The Gamecock regrets the errors. If you see an error in today’s
paper, we want to know.
E-mail us at gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Editor in Chief
Charles Tomlinson
Managing Editor
Adam Beam
News Editor
Michael LaForgia
Asst. News Editor
Alexis Stratton
Viewpoints Editor
Gabrielle Sinclair
The Mix Editor
Meg Moore
Sports Editor
Brad Senkiw
Asst. Sports Editor
Wes Wolfe
Photo Editor
Morgan Ford
Head Page Designers
Shawn Rourk. David
Stagg
Page Designers
Justin Bajan, Samantha
Hall, Staci Jordan, Philip
Whitehead
Slot Copy Editors
Amy Genoble, Alyson
Goff, Trie ip Ridgway
Copy Editors
Jessica Foster, Mary
Waters, Steven Van
Haren
Online Editor
James Tolbert
Public Affairs
Kimberly Dressier
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
News: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints: gamecockopinions@hotmail.com
The Mix: gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Public Affairs: gckpublicaffairs@hotmail.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
Editor s Office: 777-3914
STUDENT MEDIA
Director
Scott Lindenberg
Faculty Adviser
Erik Collins
Creative Director
Susan King
Business Manager
Carolyn Griffin
Advertising Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Classified Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Production Manager
Amber Justice
Creative Services
Whitney Bridges.
Robbie Burkett,
Sean O’Meara
Advertising Staff
John Blackshire,
Adam Bourgoin, Ben
Sinclair, Jesica
Johnson, Ryan
Gorman, Laytoya
Hines
The Gamecock is the
editorially independent
student newspaper of
the University of South
Carolina. It is
published Monday.
Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and
spring semesters and
nine times during the
summer, with the
exception of university
holidays and exam
periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those of
the editors or author
and not those of the
University of South
Carolina. The Board of
Student Publications
and Communications
is the publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Media is the
newspaper’s parent
organization. The
Gamecock is
supported in part by
student-activity fees.
One free copy per
reader. Additional
copies may be
purchased for $1 each
from the Department
of Student Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock , Advertising: 777-3888
1400 Greene St. ' Classified: 777-1184
Columbia, S.C. 29208 Fax:777-6482
-mg??
CARTOON BY HANNAH ANGSTADT/THE GAMECOCK
Good riddance to Limbaugh
JOHN RAB'ON
GAMECOCKVIEWPOINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
Some people should
keep their mouths shut.
You know, when my brother
told me about Rush Limbaugh
becoming a commentator for
ESPN, I wondered how long it
was going to last.
I didn’t see how it could work.
A man who’s written countless
books about how conservatives
will save the country and how ev
erything that’s going wrong is
part of some liberal conspiracy
was going to be analyzing foot
ball games for the nation’s top
sports channel. You can proba
bly guess that this just didn’t sit
well with me, so I figured I’d get a
bowl of popcorn and wait for him
to stick his foot in his mouth.
As soon as I heard the news, I
started taking bets about how
much time would pass before
Rush’s political ideas leaked into
his sports commentary. The an
swer proved to be not long at all.
If you don’t know already,
Limbaugh resigned from ESPN
following comments he made
about Philadelphia Eagles quar
terback Donovan McNabb. On
the station’s “Sunday NFL
Countdown,” the former sports
analyst was quoted as saying, “I
think what we have here is a lit
tle social concern in the NFL.
The media has been very de
sirous that a black quarterback
do well.” This led to a downward
spiral of controversy that (hope
fully) ended this past Wednesday
with Limbaugh’s resignation.
Expecting Rush Limbaugh to
keep his political opinions to him
self on a sports show is like ask
ing Dennis Miller to not attempt
humor on Monday Night Football.
He can’t help it; it’s a part of what
he is. Limbaugh is a man who’s
made a career out of being vocal
about his own ideas, often to a
very annoying extent. He can’t
keep his mouth shut.
Secondly, what kind of thing
is that to say on national televi
sion? Limbaugh is pretty much
saying the only reason McNabb
is getting any recognition is be
cause he’s black. Hey Rush, ever
given any thought to the fact that
he might actually have talent?
Maybe the reason he’s getting
media exposure is because the
Eagles had a victory last Sunday
and that as quarterback, McNabb
is kind of an unelected team rep
resentative? Neither one of those
reasons is based on his race, but
Rush makes it an issue.
Finally, we get to hear more
crap from the right about how the
media is at fault for something
or-other. If there’s one thing
about Rush Limbaugh, like any
other conservative, he likes to jab
a finger at the media, saying that
they’re all a bunch of bleeding
heart liberals, except for him, of
course. This is football, for cry
ing out loud! Nobody cares if a
player is white or black as long
as their favorite team is winning.
Oh well, good riddance to bad
rubbish at any rate. From now on,
let’s just keep media personalities
in their own respective fields. No
more entertainers trying to make
us laugh it up while watching the
Panthers on television. No more
political bigwigs trying to tell me
that the only reason a black quar
terback is getting attention is be
cause of his race and not how his
team killed its opponents. A few
words to the major networks —
when hiring for a commentator’s
position, choose people who spe
cialize in sports. Just sports.
Think about it.
Rabon is a second-year English
student.
IN YOUR OPINION
Conservative words
distorted by media
I grow ever so tired of the lib
eral media and the way their
opinions dictate the entire
scope of what we, as American
citizens, are allowed to em
brace without threats of
racism, fascism, bigotry and ig
norance. Sunday morning, I
turned on ESPN’s “NFL
Countdown” to hear an ever
opinionated Rush Limbaugh
say that Donovan McNabb is
an overrated quarterback by
the media whose social concern
for the past few years is to see a
black quarterback succeed in
the NFL, a statement that
should have induced debate
throughout the sports world.
Instead it has erupted into an
auction block, with a
Limbaugh-hating media calling
Rush everything from a racist
to a drug addict. Less than a
week later, Limbaugh has re
signed, the media are still lick
ing their chops and I’m left
thinking, “Here we go again.”
Does anyone think it’s any
thing more than a coincidence
that days after Limbaugh’s
“controversial” comment was
made, a story alleging pre
scription drug abuse has sur
faced? If you don’t know me,
I’m the one with both hands
raised high in the air. If you
pull up the Internet or open
your newspaper, 80 percent of
all the articles about Rush’s
resignation are centered on al
legations of drug abuse. Not
one article is even attempting
to argue against, or spur debate
on, the comment in question;
whether McNabb is overrated,
and if so, why? All that one can
read about is how potential
presidential candidates are cry
ing racism and bigotry and the
NAACP is crying boycott and
the Enquirer is crying drug
ahuser, and it seems more and
more that the media’s been
waiting for just this opportuni
ty. I believe it’s called, “Knock
him down, and then kick him
while he’s down.” This drug
abuse story just gets swept un
der the rug if runs by itself, but
plug it together with a “racist”
comment and let the heads roll.
The media has done it again,
and they’ve done it by taking
out of context a very debatable
statement.
I m reminded ot Mark
Cuban’s comments on how the
NBA will profit from the Kobe
Bryant sexual assault case, and
how the media blew those com
ments out of proportion. All of a
* sudden, Cuban was saying that
the NBA was looking to profit
from the case, when in the
scope of the conversation, all
Mark was trying to say was
that because of court and news
exposure, many people who
would not ordinarily watch the
NBA will be tuning in this sea
son. Luckily for Cuban, he is
well liked in the media; there
fore, his evils will stay under
wraps for now. Not as much
can be said for Limbaugh, who
has made his career in going to
battle against this leftist-mind
ed media.
l want to uo nere wnat tne
sports media should have done
from the beginning. Rush, you
are wrong about Donovan
McNabb. Yes, he’s had a bad
start this 2003 season, but he
was able to lead his team to vic
tory over a very tough Buffalo
Bills squad with a stellar per
formance this past week.
Time will tell, but I believe
that before the end of the sea
son, we will see a pl^yoffs
bound Eagles team, led by
Donovan McNabb, make another
strong run for the Super Bowl. As
for your suggestion that the me
dia has a social concern for a
black quarterback to succeed in
the NFL: Let the success of the
current black quarterbacks speak
for themselves. There’s no need
for the media to prove Limbaugh
right by rushing to McNabb’s de
fense and assassinating the char
acter of his critic.
JONATHAN BUERKERT
SECOND-YEAR ENGLISH STUDENT
Viewpoints is
one-sided
without your
opinion.
Send letters to the
editor to
gamecockopinions
@hotmail.com
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less than
300 words and include name, phone
number, professional title or year and
major, if a student. E-mail letters to
gamecockopinions@hotmail.com.
Letters will be edited. Anonymous letters
will not be published. Call the newr^oom
at 777-7726 for more information.
Offering
some
sound
advice #
RACHAL HATTON
GAMECOCKVIEWPQINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
Some couples just
aren’t meant to be.
I’ve always wanted to be an ad
vice columnist. In real life,
though, I’ve stopped giving any
accurate, sound advice and re
placed reason with what I know^^
they’ll do anyway. This saves my
breath and prevents their guilt
when next they speak to me. It’s
a happier situation, I assure you.
So I’ll use this forum to inform
people what they should really do,
and before I do so, I’ll adopt the
pseudonym “Paige Segundo”:
DEAR PAIGE: I’ve realized
that I’m aging. To combat this,
I’ve had the usual face lifts, re
decorated the house, surrounded
myself with my children, changed
careers, have become less mate
rially comfortable and worry
about how I’ll pay my bills.
Maintaining my lifestyle is be
coming a primary matter. I’m
considering marriage to someone
completely different than myself.
I suspect this might be a bad idea.^P
given our on-again off-again rela
tionship and the conflicting in
terests of his family. His political
views, personal beliefs, and eco
nomic values are the polar oppo
site of my own. I fear being over
powered by his character, losing
my identity and being expected to
give up important aspects of my
personality. He’s well off, and I
know he would provide for me,
even helping my youngest com
plete school. I just can’t make up
my mind. I fear growing old alone,
and I don’t wish to do anything
that would offend. I only hope I
can make a decision that would
best benefit all involved parties.
Imploringly,
Ms. Libby Arts
LIBBY: Snap out of it. His sci
entific approach will confuse your
sensibilities and disrupt your
habits, and he will grate on your
last nerve. He isn’t interested in
your views or your propensity for
unusual foods, either. He sounds
like a man who sticks to the mode
and follows procedure. Trust me,
he’s not worth it, so stop wasting
my time. You are better off with
out him, completely.
The primary issue here is
your refusal to duke it out on your
own, and your unwillingness to
take care of yourself. No one else
is going to do it for you, Miss
Libby. You might be getting old,^^
but your approach to marriage is
still immature. Grow up already.
You are right to assume that a
marriage between you and said
man could be fruitful and materi
ally beneficial, if the conditions
are right. You already know that
these are the worst circumstances
for union. I take it that this has
been a whirlwind courtship, and
that you both know very little
about each other. Don’t be quick
to the draw; focus first learning to
take care of yourself, then you
won’t have the problem of being
weak enough to let other people
boss you around.
Don t be a burden to society by
expecting special treatment. The
rest of us have to work — it’s time
to join the club. You know it’s a
bad idea, so why entertain it?^^
Don’t be stupid; there’s no need to^Bj
worry about what every one else
wants from you. Take it from me:
It’s okay to be self-centered. You
know as well as I do that getting
hitched is not the answer to your
troubles, and I dare say it’s the tip
of the iceberg. Don’t do anything
in haste that will cause more
crises than improvements.
Leave ’Em at the Altar,
Paige in a Rage
Hatton is % third-year women’s 1
studies student.