The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, June 05, 2002, Page 3, Image 3
flights a matnh
^“""'SKSS? /
BY ANGEL SIZEMORE
THE GAMECOCK
Foundation for Individual Rights in
Education (FIRE) is concerned about the free
dom of expression, and is not afraid to express
their opinion.
FIRE, a nonprofit organization dedicated to
ensuring individual rights and due process,
sent Dr. Palms a letter more than a month ago
expressing concern about the stipulations of
class participation in "Women's Studies 797:
Seminar in Women's Studies," a required course
for a degree in Women's Studies at USC.
Professor Lynn Weber requires students to
adhere to set ideologies in order to participate
in classroom discussions. The syllabus states
that participation counts for 20 percent of a stu
dent's total grade. Weber also hands out
"Guidelines for Classroom Discussion." These
guidelines dictate students "acknowledge that
racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, and
other institutionalized forms of oppression ex
ist."
Weber's "Guidelines" also suggest that "we
are systematically taught misinformation about
our own group and about members of other
groups."
In addition, the "Guidelines" outlined in the
syllabus asks that students enrolled in the
course "agree to combat actively the myths and
stereotypes about our own group and other
groups.”
According to FIRE, a liberal arts institu
tion should not force political beliefs on its stu
dents but should promote freethinking and con
sider individual opinions.
FIRE compares Weber's insistence that stu
dents agree with set standards to a religion pro
fessor demanding that his students commit
themselves to Christian or atheistic beliefs in
order to obtain a degree in theology.
According to FIRE representatives,
"Students and professors should be at liberty
to hold and voice any viewpoints they wish. A
university in which students are not allowed
to disagree with their professors on funda
mental assumptions about reality is incapable
of intellectual innovation, critical dialogue,
meaningful discourse, or true scholarship."
FIRE contends that Dr. Palms must imme
diately address this potential breach of free
dom at USC.
Dr. Palms has yet to respond to FIRE'S let
ter. Lynn Weber and the director of FIRE could
not be reached for comment.
Comments on this story?E-mail
gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
Inmate gets new trial thanks to sleeping lawyer
BYANNEGEARAN
ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court de
livered a victory Monday to a death row inmate
who said his lawyer snoozed through much of
his trial, a possible prelude to broader exami
nation of the quality of legal help available to
poor defendants facing the death penalty.
The high court refused a request from
Texas authorities, who wanted the court to re
instate a murder conviction and death sentence
against Calvin Jerold Burdine, who claimed
that his court-appointed lawyer slept for up to
10 minutes at a time during crucial phases of
the 1984 trial.
"The Supreme Court has served justice to
day by finding it unacceptable that an attorney
should flagrantly nap during a trial in which a
man's life is at stake," said Sue Gunawardena
Vaughn, director of Amnesty International's
Program to Abolish the Death Penalty.
The case now returns to Texas, where au
thorities must decide whether to retry Burdine
or set him free. The state had argued that
Burdine could not show his trial would have
come out differently if his lawyer had stayed
awake.
The Constitution guarantees the right to a
lawyer, and the Supreme Court has previously
said that means the right to an effective lawyer.
Burdine's victory Monday is not necessari
ly encouraging for other defendants in the long
term, said Stephen Bright, a death penalty op
ponent at the Southern Center for Human
Rights.
"The constitutional rule that comes out of
this term is that courts should have very strong
coffee available to defense lawyers," Bright said.
"If the lawyer stays awake (this year's deci
sions) suggest that any lawyer is going to be
good enough for this Supreme Court. Only in
the most dramatic and outrageous cases, such
as a lawyer sleeping through the trial, is there
going to be any relief given."
After the trial, the jury foreman and a court
clerk described how court-appointed lawyer Joe
Cannon slept for up to 10 minutes at a time.
Cannon, denied falling asleep.
Burdine lost several rounds of appeals and
survived six execution dates before a federal
court agreed that Cannon's performance vio
lated Burdine’s constitutional right to an effec
tive lawyer. A federal appeals court panel first
reversed that finding in a highly criticized rul
ing in 2000. The full appeals court then agreed to
hear the case, and agreed with the first court
that Burdine did not get a fair chance to defend
himself.
The Supreme Court let that ruling stand.
•
11:00 AM
2:00 PM
Noon
1:00 PM
1:05
2:05 PM
5:00 -
5:20 PM
5:30 -
6:30 PM
i ■
5:30
6:30 PM
5:30 -
6:30 PM
6:45
7:45 PM
Women on Weights Monday. Friday
Lower Weight Room
Faculty/Staff Workout
Monday, Wednesday and Thursday
Step Combo Monday, Wednesday, Friday
Body Sculpt Tuesday and Thursday
Water Exercise
Tuesday Shallow Wednesday Deep
II
This schedule will run from
Monday, June 3 - Friday, August 2, 2002
Participants need to pay the $10 summer fitness pro
gram fee and sign a waiver before taking part in any
group exercise sessions. For information stop by the
Campus Recreation front desk, 202 Blatt PE Center
or call 777-1827.
t
wivw.sa.sc.edu/pecenter/fit.htm
*