The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 06, 2002, Page 4, Image 4
4
0
SOUND OFF ONLINE POLL
Create message boards at Should the SG presidential
www.dailygamecock.com or elections be overturned?
send letters to the editor to www.dailygamecock.com.
gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com Results published on Fridays.
IN OUR OPINION
When will SG
The students have spoken. Twice. -
They spoke last week, when they elected Ankit
Patel to the Student Government presidency. And
now, they are speaking again, asking David
Bornemann td step aside and let Patel get on with the
business of running their government.
Since Monday, The Gamecock has received an
unusually high number of letters suggesting that
David Bornemann should give up. So far, he has
appealed the outcome of the
ornema nn presidential race to the Elections
should listen to
the students: Commission and SG Attorney
Let elections Genera^ Brian Hunter. Both have
be over upheld Patel’s presidency. The
next step for Bornemann is to
appeal to Vice President of Student and Alumni
Services Dennis Pruitt, a step he has indicated he
will take today. We believe he shouldn’t.
One of the most important characteristics of any
SG president should be an ability to understand and
respond to what students want. Students have
already clearly spoken up on this issue; Bornemann
should listen.
We also call on Patel to drop his appeal to Hunter
asking him to overturn two of the three infractions
he’s received. The election is over. Students want to
move on, and their leaders should be responsive to
that.
The people have been loud and clear. Bornemann
needs to move on and find his niche elsewhere. He
has a lot to contribute to the USC community and has
done so already, but the way to get there now is not
through Pruitt.
Winners and Sinners
SWITZERLAND Joins United Nations. Now they
can join in the fight against... uh, whatever the
UN does.
ROAD RULES Team members pig out to gain
Freshman 15 at Bates House. Next week: TRL
in Patterson Patio.
SHADOW GOVERNMENT Washington Post
reveals Bush’s backup. Most astounding: We
kept a secret for almost five months.
STAUFFER AND BORNEMANN Kenny Rogers
said it best: “You gotta know when to fold ’em.”
CONDON Sues NAACP for protesting at state
rest areas. It’s time he gives it a rest.
HONORS SOPHOMORES Three cheers! You get
to live in “prestigious” housing — if it’s still
standing when the termites are through.
GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. E-mail us
at gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
»
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Mary Hartney
Editor in Chief
Ginny Thornton
News Editor
Kevin Fellner
. Asst. News Editor
Mackenzie Clements
Viewpoints Editor
Carrie Phillips
The Mix Editor
Justin Bajan
Asst. The Mix Editor
Chris Foy
Sports Editor
J. Keith Allen
Asst. Sports Editor
Brandon Larrabee
Special Projects
Adam Beam
Contributing Editor •
Martha Wright
Design Editor
Page Designers
Crystal Dukes, Sarah
McLaulin, Katie Smith
David Stagg
Kyle Almond
Copy Desk Chief
Copy Editors
Crystal Boyles, Andre'
Festa, Jason Harmon,
Jill Martin, Paul Rhine
Mark Hartney
Online Editor
Corey Davis
Photo Assignments
Photo Technicians
Robert Gruen, Candi
Hauglum
Kelly Petruska
Community Affairs
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
University Desk: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
City Desk: gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints: gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com
The Mix: gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
EDITORIAL BOARD
Kyle Almond.
Mackenzie Clements,
Chris Foy, Mary
Hartney, Brandon
Larrabee, Carrie
Phillips, Ginny
Thornton, Martha
Wright
STUDENT MEDIA
Erik Collins
Faculty Adviser
Ellen Parsons
Director of Student
Media
Susan King
Creative Director
Carolyn Griffin
• Business Manager
Sarah Scarborough
Advertising Manager
Sherry F. Holmes
Classified Manager
*
Creative Services
Derek Goode. Todd
Hooks, Earl Jones,
Jennie Moore,
Melanie Roberts,
Beju Shah
Advertising Staff
Betsy Baugh,
Amanda Ingram,
Denise Levereaux,
Jackie Rice, Stacey
Todd
The Gamecock is the
student newspaper of
the University of South
Carolina and is
published Monday,
Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and
spring semesters and
nine times during the
summer with the
exception of university
holidays and exam
periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those
of the editors or
author and not those
of the University of
South Carolina. The
Board of Student
Publications and
Communications is
the publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Media is the
newspaper's parent
organization. The
Gamecock is
supported in part by
student activities
fees. One free copy
per reader. Additional
copies may be
purchased for one
doUar each from the
Department of Student
Media.
TO PLACE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene Street
Columbia, S.C. 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
WE CAN DRIVE, BUT (MR
INSURANCE PREMIUMS
ARE AS7RON0A1ICAL...
r ^
WE CAN WTE, BUT N0NE
Of the vtunam seem
TP CARE AQOVTI&...
I
VIE CAN HAVE SEX, BUT
RISK GETTING INFECTED
WITH HIV...
I ^
WE CAN SMOKE, BUT
RISK GETTING LUNG
CANCER OR EMPH55EAVU
WE CAN ATTEND COLLEGE,
m HAVE TO GO INTO
DEBT RJR 7£ >£AR£ TO
m FOR IT- .
,,. AND THEy
WINDER WHy
WE DRINK,
CARTOON COURTESY OF KRT CAMPUS
IN YOUR OPINION
Bornemann should
accept his defeat
The Student Government
presidential election ended
last Thursday, and the drama
of campaign promises was
replaced with antics of a
school playground. One
would think that David
Bornemann could take the
loss like a man. Instead, he’s
lowered himself by allowing
his campaign manager to drag
his name through the Aiud
and accuse Ankit Patel of
everything under the sun.
Next thing we know,
Bornemann — I mean Chrissy
Stauffer — will blame Patel
for taking part in the
Watergate scandal.
r irsi, li Dornemann says
the SG election should mirror
a “real election,” then
campaigners should be able to
. go door to door. This is how
you really get to know the
voters. Second, if you aren’t
mature enough to handle
losing, why do you think you
would be mature enough to
handle the presidency? Third,
if she knew those violations
were committed, why did
Stauffer file the infractions
after the election results were
announced? That clearly
shows that you are a sore
loser!
ii s oovious mai raiei is
committed to meet the people. I
met Patel through a friend and
was pleased to know he was
willing to get out and meet the
students he wanted to serve. It
seems that Bomemann is
jealous that he didn’t think of
that idea first. I’m willing to
bet that Patel’s staff didn’t do
anything that Bomemann’s
staff didn’t do. It just seems
that a candidate with real and
concrete goals defeated
Bomemann. Maybe
Bomemann should’ve tried to
follow Patel’s ideals; it seems
to have worked for Patel. Even
if Bomemann would get his
way and the election was
thrown out, I highly doubt he
would win the presidency,
because he’s acting like a child.
I end this with a little
advice for the sore loser: Don’t
take it personally. Take the
bitter with the sweet and
accept the loss!
CHERRON J. JENKINS
THIRD-YEAR BIOLOGY STUDENT
SG presidency is
largely powerless
Student Government
should no longer be confused
about why students on this
campus are so apathetic about
university politics. The latest
chapter in this comedy is the
recently completed election.
In what appeared to be a
well-run race by both
candidates, Ankit Patel won a
close runoffby 175 votes. After
hearing both candidates speak,
I gave my vote to Patel because
he impressed me with his
knowledge of how SG funds
were distributed and his plan
to take money away from SG
committees and give it back to
student organizations. I’ve
never put much stock into the
other “buzzword” issues such
as parking and safety because
I’m of the opinion that the SG
president can do just about as
much about those subjects as
any Carolina student can do,
which is complain.
No offense to past
presidents, but I view the
position as mostly powerless.
It has little to do with the
person who holds the position
and much to do with the
structure of the university. I
apologize to Corey Ford if I
missed something, but I really
can’t name one thing his
administration has really
accomplished. Yes, he has
avidly fought budget cuts, and
yes, I see him at every
Carolina sporting event, but
these are things many
students at Carolina do
without being president. He
can fight and debate and
petition all he wants to
accomplish tasks such as
pushing back the drop date,
but the power ultimately lies
with the Faculty Senate, the
university president and the
Board of Trustees.
mus, me su presidents
job becomes a diplomatic one,
serving as a liaison between
the students and those who
can actually add parking and
lighting. Patel and
Bomemann were simply
running for the right to their
own Russell House office and
the right to complain to more
important people.
I should be happy though,
right? My guy won. But I’m
not happy by any means; I’m
just furtherdisgusted with SG.
It turns out Patel might have
violated election codes to win.
In a close race (and yes, 175
votes is surely a close race),
any violation should be
deemed a major one.
Campaigning door to door in
eight different residence halls
could easily lead to 175 extra
votes. The mass e-mail
shouldn’t be considered a
violation just because it was
sent through a listserv; I
believe Bornemann canceled
that violation out by sending
an e-mail to a list of e-mail
addresses he acquired through
his geology class.
So now Bornemann is
appealing the decision. He has
every right to do this, and I
wish I could take back my vote
and not give it to anyone. If the
results are thrown out, I
suppose that means another
election, which might mean
another week of golf carts and
dogs in T-shirts trying to get
your vote on Greene Street. It
also means I wouldn’t vote
again, not even if you held a
gun to my head. I propose a co
presidency.
It would be just as effective
as the terms of either of the
two candidates would be by
themselves; it would
accomplish little. Sure, they’d
have to share that coveted
office in the Russell House, but
it would be twice as many
people complaining to
important people.
CRAIG SMITH
THIRD-YEAR MARKETING AND
SPORTS MANAGEMENT STUDENT
Accusations aren’t
solid proof of rape
I have a question for Martha
Wright: What kind of chip on
your shoulder do you have for
men? First, we’re pigs because
we use the term “girl,” and
now, we’re automatically
assumed guilty when we’re
accused of rape. If Sen. John
Hawkins committed rape, he
should be dragged behind'a car
and locked up for the rest of his
life. Rape is a disgusting thing to
do to a person and shouldn’t be
tolerated.
However, we don’t know what
went on between Hawkins and
his accuser. If she was raped,
then she shouldn’t have dropped
the charges. Unfortunately, she
did, despite “one of the strongest
rape cases” a Spartanburg police
has ever seen. If the case was so
strong, why did she not pursue
it? Because she was afraid of
how she would be portrayed? If
the defense had done that, then
she would have had a case to sue
for libel (assuming of course,
that none of it would have been
true). Plus, we know absolutely
nothing about this woman,
except that she accused him of
rape, which seems to be enough
for some to pass verdict on
Hawkins. The facts are that he
was accused of rape, and
because there was no trial, he
had no chance to prove he might
be innocent. If she was raped,
then I hope he gets what he
deserves for doing such an
unforgivable act. But we can’t
condemn a man on accusations
without giving him the
' opportunity to defend himself
and clear his name. Rape
shouldn’t be ignored, nor should
it be thrown around and labeled
on those who might or might not
be guilty of the crime.
JASON C. STEPP
Reed should try
technical school
In response to Shanna Reed’s
column in Monday’s paper,
anyone who believes his or her
educational funds are being
wasted by reading “Hamlet”
belongs in a technical college
and not at a university.
“Higher education” is so
named because we expose
ourselves to the world outside of
high-tech computers and the
stock market. When you tear
your eyes from your most useful
companion (the computer), and
step into the outside world, you
encounter relationships with
other people and situations that
require a different kind of
knowledge. Writers see the
world in ways we can never
truly understand, and what
higher education teaches us
about the things around us and
the human race is invaluable. It
helps us to Detter unaerstana
who we are and to look at the
relationships in our lives from
new perspectives.
Math and philosophy help
stretch our minds and use
reasoning and logic. What about
art and music? Self-expression is
another key to understanding the
human spirit. History is always
relevant in our lives because it’s
apt to repeat itself if we can’t
learn from past mistakes.
If you think your money is
being wasted in college because
you’re reading the same play
twice, you have completely
missed the point. Every time
you read a book, your
experience will be different. You
will see things you didn’t before
and have fresh viewpoints from
new classmates. An older
perspective does wonders for
changing a story’s meaning.
In short, if you want to get
directly connected with your
major and bypass all the useless
knowledge, then you have no
place in a university. A
university is, after all, a
♦ LETTERS, SEE PAGE 9
Aren’t we
supposed
to evolve?
TAYLOR MARSHALL
GREEN
GAMECOCKVIEWPOINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
Bush shouldn’t grant
Yasser Arafat immunity.
I thought the world was getting
safer and smarter. You don’t have
to attend second grade to know
that evolution perpetuates
intelligence. Adam and Eve are
about as popular in science as
Commodore 64s are in computer
labs. It’s pretty easy to recognize
that we evolved from the ape,
among other things, and
gradually got smarter. We
learned to climb trees, eat
termites with a blade of grass, and
exterminate life with a blade of
steel. So we’ve come so far, right?
I thought the human race had
gone through the adolescent
phase of evolution already. I
thought we had turned away
from cutting some guy’s hand off
because he stole the loaf of bread.
Sure, you’re still not
permitted to buy Dewars in the
same room you buy your
Michelob, and Republicans want
children to carry ,357s to class
instead of lunchboxes, but I
think we’ve come pretty far.
So then why do I feel as
uiuugn we re in ior a
tremendous future of violence,
death and despair? Why do I see
the same headline everyday?
What happened to this talk
about ridding the world of
terrorism wherever it may be?
Why is it that I can tell that
Yasser Arafat is a terrorist, but
our president can’t?
The Bush administration has
one of the world’s greatest
terrorists on the phone and
they’re baby-sitting him instead
of dealing with him accordingly.
All the PLO has said is that the
violence it inflicts upon Israel is
instigated by not getting what
they want. If its plea has been
overshadowed by the graphic (
images of those blown apart, you
should know that all Arafat
wants is his own Palestinian
state. And if bombing the hell
out of the West Bank will get
that for him, he’ll give the green
light for bloodshed any day of
the week. Well, I want to be rich,
but you don’t see me robbing
banks.
It’s seems like Arafat has
been granted some type of
diplomatic immunity. With this
new type of globalization against
terrorism, Arafat’s “immunity”
is unchallenged — and also sad,
because we just kicked
Afghanistan in the groin.
We have to be fair, don’t we?
We have to be balanced in what
we concentrate on, right? Do we *
have to direct so much attention
to the conflict between Israel and
Arafat? I can only wonder what
it is about Israel that gets the
United States so hot and heavy.
Is it going to take another
century for the United States and
the world to evolve and realize
that Arafat has as much to do
with terrorism as religion does?
I love the concept of growth. It
pushes a being to a new stage in
life. I thought that we’d have
grown out of this phase of
violence and double standards.
When considering how far the
human race has come, the
diplomacy with Arafat is similar
to me going to Circle K and
spending $17 on Garbage Pail
Kids and Bazooka Joe; it’s
immature and contradictory.
Is the height of evolution a
time when the Earth’s skin isn’t
irritated because a couple
countries feel relentless
bombing of each other is the
only way to resolve the matter?
Maybe the height of evolution is
an apex of intelligence where
what’s right is right and what’s
wrong is wrong. And there is
only one way to deal with the
right and only chie way to deal
with the wrong.
Marshall-Green is a fourth-year 1
electronic journalism student.