The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 06, 2002, Page 7, Image 7
AnP 6£m^a IT (5/o‘T^^
y */ Au&fZf&HTS A5 W \Jr|
fal Jr >™?£r< nunic> U ^ioe &>*e>e& W
jftfmtif C0M&ATANT5 VMe$Et M
jjjji
IN YOUR OPINION
USC police a burden
and incompetent
The USC Police Department
seems unqualified to handle any
task, including student safety
and traffic control.
While I’m certain there are
members of the campus police
force that are more than capable,
I’m saddened that the majority of
the campus police force has, at
best, an indifferent attitude
toward students’ well-being.
I’ve witnessed many
incidents where different
officers would berate students
for “getting in their way.”
Also, the incompetence of the
traffic control division is
preposterous.
Drawing from recent
experiences, it’s failed time
and time again to even attempt
to help students.
My car was towed this
morning from an area that was
not marked as a tow-away zone,
and the officer I spoke to simply
said, "There is supposed to be a
sign there.” Obviously, there
was no sign, and I wasn’t able
to get a better answer than one
claiming ignorance.
Once I got to the office to pay
my ticket, I was told that the
police department didn’t
provide change for the $5 ticket
and I would have to find
change myself. This would be
understandable had I
presented a $100 bilVor even a
$50 bill.
But I had a $20 bill, and the
student in front of me paid a
$10 ticket with two $5 bills.
Even then, I was told they had
no change. I now have a book of
20 stamps that I did not need,
want or have use for.
Also, the officers seemed
almost offended that I drew
them away from the
compelling world of daytime
television to do their job. I
wasn’t expecting a grand
welcome, but I should at least
expect someone who could do
his or her job.
I had to wait at least 30
minutes for the officers to even
locate my ticket, and even
longer for Jenny Jones to get to
commercial so they could
write my receipt.
I know we can’t do without a
police department, but I do
insist on one that can be
functional at best. I implore
the university to either
increase training for these
officers or have a more
strenuous screening process
for employment.
TONY CHANG
FOURTH-YEAR COMPUTER
INFORMATION SYSTEMS STUDENT
Age doesn’t make
girls into women
What makes a woman a
woman and a man a man? This
isn’t a question about age; one
doesn’t become an adult
because they’ve lived 18 years.
A fairy doesn’t come touch
your head with a wand and,
poof, you reach adulthood. It
has less to do with age and
more to do with responsibility,
maturity and experience. Not
every female on campus is a
woman, just like not every
male on campus is a man.
Like me, I’m sure there are
students out there being
supported by their parents —
driving cars we didn’t buy and
going to school we don’t pay for.
I hope those in this situation
truly appreciate what their
parents are doing for them, but,
unintentionally, they might be
hurting their kids in the long
run and holding them back
from taking responsibility of
their own lives.
Being an adult is about
being responsible and taking
responsibility for your actions
when you’re the goat or the
hero.
Being an adult is taking
control of your life no matter
what the consequence.
Yes, there are 18-year-olds
on campus who are men and
women, but I would contend
that there is a majority who
have a lot of growing up to do
before being considered adults.
In closing, girls and boys, we
must earn the right to be called
men and women.
JAMES ROCKWELL
FOURTH-YEAR MEDIA ARTS
STUDENT
BGLA has failed its
minority members
I was pleasantly surprised
to see in last Wednesday’s
paper that a spinoff of BGLA
was formed to address issues
of minority bisexuals, gays
and lesbians. As a former
attendee of BGLA meetings, I
was even more surprised to
find that BGLA is in an uproar
about this, thinking that the
new group is trying to “break
away” immaturely or accuse
them of some injustice.
In truth, the BGLA has
failed the minority within the
minority that has been too
polite to voice its complaints;
most minority members have
abandoned BGLA in disgust. I,
however, am more than
willing, as an open-minded
white heterosexual, to
confront BGLA with the truth
of their shortcomings.
But first, just to prove that I
think it is a great organization,
let me outline some of the goals
of BGLA and how the
organization has done a great
job in meeting them:
Goal one:... to encourage
people to be themselves, and if
they are gay, to give them a
safe place to be open and
honest...
This goal has been met
magnificently. It’s obvious
there are people who feel
comfortable with BGLA,
seeing that they all find the
need and loyalty to come
together to bash another
group, which focuses on
building the same community.
Goal two:... to increase
awareness of the group’s
existence and to discourage
bigotry on the campus...
They have accomplished
wonderful strides in this as
well. Years ago, they helped
invent the Carolinian Creed.
Goal three:... to educate...
This is where BGLA has
failed the racial minority and
the rest of the USC community
miserably.
BGLA has made it necessary
to form an organization that
targets real concerns among,
for instance, blacks... like
issues that matter, such as
HIV/AIDS, hate crimes and
racism, all of which are more
likely to affect blacks,
especially gay blacks.
Yet, BGLA is often silent on
these issues. BGLA members
talk about hate crimes amongst
themselves, fail to
acknowledge racism and
address HIV/AIDS maybe once
a year by bringing in a speaker
to talk about condoms.
This “education” is not
enough — especially
considering that a gay black
male is at an extremely high
risk of getting AIDS, especially
compared with a gay white
male.
This new organization has
no desire to handle issues
11 ii..
The group wants to
supplement meetings with
information that is actually
useful and issues that they can
do something about, instead of
dreaming away about getting
“gay rights” pushed through
Congress or attending a
worthless meeting that has
become nothing more than a
bisexual, gay and lesbian
dating service.
So here’s some advice to
BGLA: Work with this group!
They have real concerns —
concerns that are being ignored.
REBECCA GAUSE
FOURTH-YEAR HISTORY AND
POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor should be less
than 300 words and include name,
phone number, professional title or
year and major, if a student. Bring
letters to Russell House 333 or e-mail
gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
The Gamecock reserves the right to
edit for libel, style and space.
Anonymous letters will not be
published. Call the newsroom at
777-7726 for more information.
Girl, that just isn’t happening
JAY COOPER
GAMECOCKVIEWPOINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
women snouia juage
men’s disrespect on
more than word choice.
“What up, girl?”
“How you doin’, girl?”
“Girl, you look good today!”
At USC, you’re likely to heai
these statements many times a
day. They’re so common that
we usually don’t pay them any
special attention. They’re
statements made in greeting,
usually reserved for friendly
encounters. They’re
exclamations any female
might be happy to hear.
Martha Wright’s column in
Monday’s paper addresses the
issue of the “girl” word. Her
column, “Girl, You’ll be a
Woman Soon,” is about female
subjugation and how men use
the word girl to keep women
below them on the social ladder
Wright’s request is that
men always refer to females
who are 18 years old and older
as women. But Wright’s
‘ argument is nearsighted and
largely incorrect. People of
both sexes and of all different
ages and backgrounds use the
word “girl” in many different
contexts and with many
different connotations.
I suppose that from now on,
I’ll have to refer to female
friends of mine as “the
birthday woman” on their
birthdays. None of them have
ever taken offense at being
called “the birthday girl”
before, but according to
Wright’s standard, I’m subtly
plotting their subjugation.
Likewise, I’ll never again
have a girlfriend. While I
know this statement comes as
no surprise to my friends, this
time I’m using it to make a
different point. Any romantic
partner that I have from now
on will be called my
“womanfriend.” That has a
nice ring to it — “Mom, Dad,
meet my wdmanfriend.”
In her column, Wright uses
hypothetical examples of her
own. She has an office
manager approaching
assistants and asking, “What
do you girls have planned for
this weekend?” To Wright,
these words can have no other
intent than to illustrate that
- the manager doesn’t see his
female assistants as equals. As
funny as this might sound on
your lips, in one respect,
Wright is right. An office
manager could use the word
“girl” to show disrespect.
Wright is wrong, however,
because in a million other
situations, the manager might
not mean any disrespect at all.
Regardless of the manager’s
word choice, women 18 and
older have more effective
methods of judging the
intentions of their bosses. Why
is this manager, who
supposedly sees himself as so
much better than his female
assistants, asking about their
weekend at all? Couldn’t he be
doing more constructive
fascist tasks like hiding their
birth-control pills or lifting the
toilet seats in the female
restroom? Could it be that the
manager takes a genuine
interest in their lives, and is
trying to improve office
morale by asking about them?
Of course.
The manager could also be a
sexist jerk. We’ll never know.
Only the females in that
situation would know.
I would think that women 18
and older would pay more
attention to more important
aspects of the man in question
rather than his use of a single
word.
What is his past behavior?
Is he always condescending?
Does he treat men better than
he treats women? These
answers would be much more
useful in determining his level
of respect for females.
I believe that Martha
Wright means well. I think
that she would like to
eradicate misogyny and
sexism. I have no argument
with that.
It’s clear to me, however,
that she’s chosen the wrong
battle. Eliminating the use of a
word isn’t going to eliminate
the intent behind the word.
Women, girls, ladies and
females have to be trusted.
They have to be trusted to use
their own sense to recognize
when they are being
• discriminated against.
Cooper is a third-year English
student.
L__ □
It's Electric!^
IT’S SYNERGY
IT’S JOBS
IT’S VISION
IT’S CAREER
IT’S POWER
VJe're -talking, franiiviiscion lines and corporate
connections. &y attracting, new business invest
ments and providing, low-cost electricity,
Santee Cooper provides the power to prosper
Santee Coopen power
www.santeecooper.com
& PRE-PAID
PHONE CARDS
Now available at our ATM locations and offices!
Many phone cards come with "built-in, hidden charges" - but not ours!
The only fee attached is the mandatory $.49 if used from a pay phone...
YOU GET 120 MINUTES for $10...
less than 9 cents a minute!
Remember Carolina Collegiate ATM locations also
offer Postage Stamps ($6.12 for 18 stamps)
along with traditional cash ATM services!
Carolina Collegiate Federal Credit Union
710 Pulaski Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 • (803) 251-8474 • 1-800-476-5861 • www.carolina.org
Contact us for Membership Information