The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 10, 2001, Page 6, Image 6
IN OUR OPINION
Fighting on
*
all the fronts
This weekend, the United States took the first step
in what will be a long and difficult war against
terrorism. However, in its eagerness to win the first
phase of the battle, our nation must not forget to fight
the war against terrorism on all fronts.
Fighting the war on terrorism will involve more
than bombing terrorist camps and rounding up
Osama bin Laden and his
followers. The terrorists are
not the cause of terrorism, but
the perpetrators; the roots lie
in a deep-seated hatred of the
United States.
The war America must now
fight is a battle for the hearts, minds'and livelihoods
of potential terrorists. The Bush administration has
taken the first step by dropping food along with its
bombs, but there are more steps to be taken, and they
must be continued long after the Taliban has been
defeated and bin Laden’s network dismantled.
First, the United States must stop a policy of
ignorance and indifferehce toward Arab states. Aid
should flow freely to states that are friendly to the
United States; pressure must be applied to make sure
that aid reaches the people.
Second, the United States must pressure friendly
regimes in the region to loosen their grip on power.
In Hosni Mubarak’s Egypt, dissidents are sometimes
jailed, and homosexuals have recently been put on
trial. America must push its allies in the Middle East
to stop such practices.
Third, America must make it clear that America’s
war is with the Taliban, not its subjects; and that we
will finish the job only if the well-being of
Afghanistan’s people is assured.
Otherwise, the United States will never win its war
against terrorism. It will continue to pull up weed
after terrorist weed, only to have more and more
ferocious enemies appear to fill the void.
GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
%
In a headline, the name of a fraternity who sponsored a step
show was misspelled. The correct spelling is Alpha Phi Alpha.
A profile about Langston Moore that ran in the Sept. 26 edition
of The Gamecock incorrectly identified the person in the photo as
Moore. The man in the picture was Larrell Johnson, of Florida, the
starting center for the Gamecocks. The Gamecock regrets the
errors.
GAMECOCK CLARIFICATIONS
A chart that accompanied a story about the termination of some
degree programs should have said no new students would be
accepted into the programs only after the closing date listed in the
graphic.
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. Write us
at gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
Fighting the war
on terrorism will
require more than
bombing terrorist
camps.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Martha Wright
Editor in Chief
Mary Hartney
University Editor
Ginny Thornton
Asst. Univ. Editor
Victoria Bennett
The Mix Editor
Justin Bajan
Asst. The Mix Edito
Chris Foy
Sports Editor
Preston Baines
Asst. Sports Editor
Elizabeth Swartz
Online Editor
Aaron Hark
Photo Editor
Greg Hambrick
City Editor
Alicia Balentine
Asst. City Editor
Brandon Larrabee
Viewpoints Editor
Page Designers
Mackenzie Clement
Crystal Dukes, Katii
Smith, David Stagg
Copy Editors
Crystal Boyles, Jasc
Harmon, Jill Martin,
Carolyn Rowe
Political Cartoonist
Graphic Artist
F^ne Moffatt
CONTACT INFORMATION
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
University Desk: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
City Desk: gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints: gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com
The Mix: gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Online: www.dailygamecock.com
Newsroom: 777-7726
TO PUCE AN AD
The Gamecock
1400 Greene Street
Columbia, SC 29208
Advertising: 777-3888
Classified: 777-1184
Fax: 777-6482
STUDENT MEDIA
Erik Collins,
Faculty Adviser
Ellen Parsons,
Director of Student Media
Susan King,
Creative Director
Carolyn Griffin,
Business Manager
Sarah Sims,
Advertising Manager
Sherry F. Holmes,
Classified Manager
Creative Services
Todd Hooks, Jennie Moore
/ Martin Salisbury, Beju Sha
Advertising Staff
Betsy Baugh, Caryn
Barowsky, Denise Leverea
n Jackie Rice, Stacey Todd
Gamecock Community Affi
, Karen Yip
Graphic Artist
Candi Hauglum
The Gamecock is the
student newspaper of the
University of South
Carolina and is published
Monday, Wednesday and
Friday during the fall and
spring semesters and nine
times during the summer
with the exception of
university holidays and
exam periods. Opinions
expressed in The
Gamecock are those of
the editors or author and
not those of the University
of South Carolina. The
Board of Student
Publications and
Communications is the
publisher of The
Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Media is the newspaper's
parent organization. The
Gamecock is supported in
part by student activities
i, fees. One free copy per
reader. Additional copies
may be purchased for one
dollar each from the
jx. Department of Student
Media.
ilrs
THE GAMECOCK
Americans hurt America, too
ANGELA WILSON
GAMECOCKVIEWPOINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
How can we clean
house on a global scale
If our own is filthy?
Let me preface this column
by saying this: I love our
country. There are few places in
the world I would rather live. I
was even about to join the
armed forces when I graduated
from high school, but Uncle
Sam said I was too fat. Having
said that, I will move on to the
rest of this column.
I was riding down the street
the other day and stopped at a
light. As I looked out the
window of the car, I saw two
women folding the flag they had
just taken down from the
flagpole outside their place of
business. I looked at my friend
who was driving and told her I
didn’t feel the patriotism that
the rest of the country was
feeling, at least not to the extent
everyone else is. I mean, I listen
to talk radio everyday, read the
paper, and watch television like
the rest of the country, but it
doesn’t make me feel patriotic
—just angry.
I have been asking myself,
what made the attack on the
World Trade Center so much
more different than the
previous attacks on Americans
within our own borders? “What
other attacks?” you ask? How
about the burning of black
churches by the KKK? What
about the daily sexual assaults
perpetrated in this country?
What about gay bashing? What
about child abuse — an attack
against the most defenseless of
Americans?
Are not all of these attacks on
us as a country? If we are up in
arms about the bombing of an
American icon and all it stood
for, then why not about these
other atrocities? We seem to be
holding in higher regard an
attack on Americans by
“outsiders” than those done by
our very own. We can’t really
expect to go to another country
and clean house when our own
is filthy.
We as a nation will unite to
show strength against an
outsider’s attack, but we shut
the door and draw the blinds to
the terrorists living in our
neighborhoods. We will sit idly
by when the woman next door
screams for help as her spouse
beats her black-and-blue. Not
many people will stand up and
report suspected child abuse
even when they see a child
covered in bruises, and even
after all the strides that have
been made towards racial
equality people still turn their
heads when they hear slurs,
pretending they are not
involved nor affected.
How can we pretend to be
united when we are so divided?
We need to take care of home
first. If all the talk radio hosts
talked as much about ways to
end spousal abuse, poverty, or
truly helping the homeless as
much as they talk about how we
should do our part to bail out
the airlines, maybe I’d feel the
love.
TN YOTTR OPTNTON
Paper shouldn’t
run Maurice’s ad
Before entering this
university, we all pledged to
“discourage bigotry, while
striving to learn from
differences in people, ideas
and opinions.” We all
understood that allegiance to
the ideals of the Carolinian
Creed required us to refrain
from and discourage
behaviors that threaten the
freedom and respect every
individual deserves.
So do African-American
students not deserve to open
up The Gamecock without
being offended? We guess not.
On Wednesday, Oct. 3, we
opened The Gamecock and
immediately got offended by
the discount coupon for
Maurice's BBQ. Why should a
company that goes against the
beliefs of the university creed
be able to advertise in the
university's main
publication? If Maurice's
beliefs are so secular, why
were his products taken down
from so many shelves in
America's grocery stores?
The University of South
Carolina is supposed to be a
multicultural school. We
would like to see ads in The
Gamecock that stand for our
creea, noi spit m laue: i ms
ad is a symbol of hatred that is
stirring the emotions of the
tuition-paying African
American students who
attend this school. We believe
this kind of behavior will lead
to other subtle, somewhat
unnoticeable forms of racism.
How would one feel if they
opened up The Gamecock and
saw an ad from a company
whose history has
discriminated against one's
race? Not very happy, huh?
We understand that this ad
supports this publication, but
it does not support the
CREED. We know there are
many more businesses here in
Columbia that would be
willing to advertise in our
publication that stand for
what USC “says” it’s all about.
With Creed Week just passed,
let’s actually live by it and not
just have something cute that
the university’s forefathers
came up with to make a week
out of.
CECELIA BOOKER
SECOND-YEAR STUDENT
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS
STEFANIE GADSON
FIRST-YEAR STUDENT
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Cuss words don’t
belong in print
Unless your faculty
adviser, student editor or the
columnist himself (herself?)
uses the s-word and the f-word
in conversation with their
mothers, I don’t think they
should be used on your Web
site or in campus
publications. If our educated
people do not practice civility
and decency in their
communications, who will?
During my 30 years as an
editor at community and
metropolitan newspapers, I
cited a simple exercise for
young reporters who wanted
to print crude wordage: call
your mother and use that
expression in the
conversation and permit your
associates to listen in. Not one
ever accepted the offer. Hard
hitting comment is often the
backbone of a good
newspaper, but we must never
offend our readers with
barracks/street-druggie
language.
JAMES P. MCFADOEN
DOYLESTOWN. PA.
Cell phones disrupt
classes too often
I am writing this letter
because something needs to be
said about the use of cell phones
in the classroom. I sit in class
every day, and every day at least
one phone rings in the middle of
lecture. I have had two people in
the middle of class actually pick
up and talk during the middle of
class. Now, I don’t pay $2,000 a
semester to hear someone have
a conversation while I am
trying to take notes and can’t
hear the professor because he or
she is talking.
Something needs to be done
about the use of cell phones in
class. It is inappropriate and
disrespectful to those of us who
actually have to pay for our
education. It isn’t like these
people are the only ones who
have a cell phone. I have one,
but mine isn’t on in the middle
of class because I have respect
for the professor who is
lecturing. Classes aren’t that
long. You can go 50 minutes or
an hour and 15 minutes without
talking on the phone.
I hope this letter gets read by
professors and that they start
enforcing rules on phones in
class. It really is annoying to me,
and, I’m sure, to most students.
S. HUFFSTETLER
FOURTH-YEAR STUDENT
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor or guest columns
are welcome from the Carolina
community. Letters should be 250-300
words. Guest columns should be about
600 words. Both must include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. Deliver
handwritten submissions to Russell
House room 333, or send e-mail to '
gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com. The
Gamecock reserves the right to edit for
libel, style and space. Anonymous letters
will not be published. Photos are required
for guest columnists and can be provided
by the submitter. Call 777-7726 ,or more
information.
The real
‘tyrants’
TAYLOR MARSHALL
GREEN
GAMECOCKVIEWPOINTS@HOTMAIL.COM
The audacity! The Taliban has
the audacity to say that U.S.-led
attacks on their country are a
“terrorist act” against Islam or
Muslims around the world? Good
men! What are your brain capacities
dwindling to?
You want to sit there and say the
U.S. is foolish to attack a “good and
peace-loving nation” such as
Afghanistan? Zaeef?! What’s up, my
man? You binnie-Laden’s lap-dog or
something? What happened to all
that “America is chickens#@t”
talk?
And you got the knockers to call
us “tyrants”? I mean, haven’t you
seen New Jack City? When
cultivating poppy seeds for your
opium trade, don’t get high on you
own supply! The smack you’re
talking about, “direct violation and
terrorist action done by the tyrant
United States of America,” is
apparently the diatribe of a junkie.
The only tyrannical shit I see is the
law you lay down on the women of
your country.
Mullah Omar?! You hear me,
man? I said women are falling from
their own balconies. They’ve taken a
liking to caustic soda. It’s got a nasty
aftertaste that lasts for three days,
and the only way to get rid of it is to
die. You and the “Students” are
driving women to this, Bro. The
suicide group of unemployed,
depressed, oppressed women in
Afghanistan is starting to look like a
dentist convention in Seattle. You
call us tyrants? I thought it was you
who prioritized blowing up
Buddhas instead of feeding your
hungry.
You got these people thinking
this is the way the world operates.
Take away their television and
photos, take away a woman’s
education, take away her
appearance, take away her ability to
live mentally sound, take away her
12-year-old sons and put ’em in
terrorist training camps. You got
the pit-sack to call us tyrants?!
Haven’t you opened the bay
windows of the cave and seen your
training grounds? Your own
soldiers are running to northern,
greener pastures.
Omar?! Didn’t we buy you a
soccer stadium so you could play
soccer in it? Weren’t you guys gonna
try to make the 2002 World Cup?
Last I heard, you were taking your
“loyal" subjects and putting barrels
of guns to their heads... “click-click
bang-bang, cause it ain’t no thang”
for you to spray a women’s frontal
lobe onto midfield. Should we have
sent instructions with the soccer
stadium, Omar? You’re supposed to
show yellow cards and Pele-like
bicycle-kicks to promote youth and
national sports initiative programs,
not lobotomize a woman with an
AK47 and 5.45-mm rounds because
she likes hanging her arm out of the
truck on sunny days.
Tyrants? Us? Hey, we’re not
perfect. Our women’s rights in this
country are still developing but
strong with commitments from both
sides of the sexes. But I think I can
say this without landing too far off...
your equal-rights laws suck. Bottom
line, Stupid.
You make it so easy for the little
one up in our Executive Mansion to
press the round, red button. You can
call us tyrant all you want. But when
the veil falls, Omar, Zaeef, Taliban,
everyone in the world is going to see
the flies. And it’s not the flies that
cover the walls and cots of your
hospitals where many of your
women sit battered and in neurosis.
It’s not the flies on the grain you feed
the young recruits who had no
choice but to give up marbles for
German G-3s. It’s the flies on your
corpse that everyone in the world
will see.
But by then your rule might
cover only the caverns of Pamir.
Then you can oppress and rape the
stalagmites and limestone, and the
only lip you’ll get from them is the
echo of your hateful and tyrannical
voice.