The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 26, 2001, Page 6, Image 6
6
IN OUR OPINION
New rules
goodfor now
As universities across the nation start the second
week of college football since the Sept. 11 attacks on
the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, USC has
decided to take great care in dealing with visitors to
its pending game with Alabama.
The university is to be commended for its
willingness to deal with the threat of possible
terrorist attacks. The entire nation is on a
heightened state of alert, and it would be foolish for
Williams-Brice Stadium to be left out of that
equation.
USC, like the However, USC, like the
nation, must be nation, must be careful about
careful about What it dofes in the name of
what it does in safety. The ban on shoulder
the name Of bags strikes us as vague; some
safety, purses look like shoulder bags,
and university officials must
be very careful when they attempt to draw that line.
The university should also be careful to apply the
rules equally. Arab Americans must not be singled
out for more stringent searches in the name of
“safety.”
And the regulations should be temporary. As long
as there is a convincing and immediate threat of
terrorism, the university should keep the rules in
place. Maintaining them beyond that point creates a
clear and present danger to our civil liberties.
Preston should
focus on outreach
When Ken and Margaret Perkins leave Preston at
the end of this year, the residents of the building will
no doubt have few ill words to speak of them. That is
because the Perkinses have governed Preston well.
But there is a larger issue for the next principal to
focus on: reaching out to the university community.
This should, in fact, be an immediate priority for the
Perkinses and all Preston residents.
There are rampant misconceptions about Preston;
it is known as the gay dorm, the art dorm, the snob
dorm, the freak dorm, etc.
Preston’s residents and leaders must fight those
beliefs with actions, not words. The building’s
residents should reach out to the rest of the campus
and show them what living in Preston is really about.
9
GAMECOCK CORRECTIONS
If you see an error in today’s paper, we want to know. Write us
at gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
ABOUT THE GAMECOCK
Martha Wright CONTACT INFORMATION
Editor in Chief _ llL n .. u _
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
M uar*nev Editor in Chief: gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
University Editor University Desk: gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
City Desk: gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Ginn Thornton Viewpoints: gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com
Asst Univ Editor Spotlight. gamecockmixeditor@hotmail.com
Sports: gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Victoria Bennett °nline: www.dailygamecock.com
The Mix Editor Newsroom: 777-7726
__ _ _ _ ... . _ The Gamecock is the
Justin Bajan ID PLACE AN AD student newspaper of the
Asst. The Mix Editor T University of South
1400 Greene Street Carolina and is Published
Snort* Editor Columbia. SC 29208 Monday, Wednesday and
Sports Editor Advertising: 777-3888 FridaV duf'ng the fall and
Preston Baines Classified: 777-1184 spring semesters and nine
As*t7port”Editor Fax: 777-6482 “^7"
Elizabeth Swartz STUDENT MEDIA ™lTo7nionns
Online Editor Erik Collins, Faculty Adviser expressed in The
Ellen Parsons, Director of Gamecock are those of
5*7""* Student Media the editors or author and
pnoto honor Susan King, Creative Director not those of the University
. „ K ... Carolyn Griffin, Business of South Carolina. The
7*7 Manager Board of Student
oity Editor Sarah Sjms Advertising Publications and
Manager Communications is the
AHcla Balentlne sherry F Hp| Classified publisher of The
Asst. City Editor Manager Gamecock. The
Department of Student
Brandon Uirrabee Creative Services Media is the newspaper's
Viewpoints Editor Tod(j Hooks Martin parent organization. The
Salisbury, Beju Shah Gamecock is supported in
Page Designers part by student activities
Mackenzie Advertising Staff fees. One free copy per
Clements, crystal Batsy Baugh Caryn reader. Additional copies
Dukes, Katie smith, Barowsky, Denise Levereaux, may be purchased for one
David stagg Jackie Rice. Stacey Todd dollar each from the
Department of Student
CrystalVoyTes, Gamecock Community Affairs Media.
Corey Garriott, Jason Karen Yip
Harmon, Jill Martin, . ., ...
Carolyn Rowe Graphic Art^s
Candi Hauglum
COLLEGE PRESS EXCHANGE
Becoming Snake Plissken
__'
PHIL WATSON
WATSONPHIL@YAHOO.COM
What?! Apocalypse
now? But I’m right in
the middle of dinner.
This might be a little off-key
for The Gamecock, but what
you’re about to read has
nothing to do with fetish shows
involving hot-wax torture, body
suspension and spanking.
There are also no 30-inch
articles, complete with four
color pictures, about lesbians
making salad. Did The
Associated Press get that
bombshell on the wire yet?
But that could be a dead issue
soon. Many are saying our
generation’s idle hands may
soon be too bloody and tired to
push political and social
agendas. Hunter S. Thompson
called those of us in college
today “poor bastards” who will
be the first generation of
Americans to have a lower
standard of living than our
parents.
Ha! Bring it on, I say. Maybe
graduating from college,
marrying some girl and having
two and a half kids isn’t the best
route anyway. Maybe living in
a fortified compound in the
mountains, eating rationed
cans of potted meat and using
my vast arsenal to defend
myself against roaming bands
of murderous, post-apocalyptic
scavengers is what I was bom
to do. I bet I’d be pretty good at
it. I’d wear an eye patch, a
cowboy hat with those loops to
hold 12-gauge shells, a
snakeskin vest and everything!
I’d go the whole nine. I’d even
rename myself Snake Plissken.
You know what they say; if
your going to be a survivor in a
post-apocalyptic wasteland, go
all out. I’d be like Kevin Costner
in all those box office bombs he
did.
Sure, it would have been nice
have an office job and drive a
nice car. But I’m sure someone
at the trading post will give me
a rusty old military jeep if I
have four barrels of non
contaminated water to haggle
with.
I m hopmg that one day,
while patrolling the barbed
wire fence around the
perimeter of my compound, I’ll
find a stray cow or something.
I’d be a rich man then. There
would be so many options.
Would I use it for milk? Would I
eat it? Or would I trade it for
some land mines? I’ll probably
go with the latter. That way, I’ll
save ammunition when the
bands of scavengers come to kill
me and pillage my compound.
But I’m not guaranteed to
find a cow. That’s a reality I’ll
have to deal with. So I’m
planning ahead now by
hoarding large quantities of
things I think will he hot
trading items. Toothpaste,
gasoline, toilet paper, yo-yos,
blankets, cyanide capsules and
instructional books about
cannibalism will all be hot
ticket items, especially during
the holidays.
Entertainment in the post
apocalyptic age will probably
be radically different than it is
today. Instead of watching
MTV’s Real World, we’ll draw
pictures in the dirt with sticks
and make up stories about
those pictures to tell each other.
Sounds better than the Real
World to me. Instead of
watching plays and concerts,
we’ll watch death matches,
where people get in a makeshift
dirt arena surrounded by
human skulls and fight each
other to death with rusty
shovels and pitchforks, all for
the chance to win a kerosene
heater. Now that’s
entertainment. Much more
captivating than Cats.
uur society wm oe Kina oi
like the show Survivor. Only
the prize isn’t a million dollars,
it’s not dying. A good time will
be had by all. Especially me. I
think I’d be a good survivor.
For generations, my ancestors
in Europe starved and lived
under oppressive governments,
but the bloodline managed to
live on, and here I am. Survival
is in my blood, and I love a good
challenge.
But the apocalypse
probably isn’t upon us, and I’ll
probably graduate college, get
married and have two and a
half kids. Oh well, it would have
been fun to have my own
compound and stockpile
weapons, but it’s probably for
the best that we’ll be all right.
Besides, if our society crumbled
I’d never get to find out what
happens with Ross and Rachel
on Friends.
IN YOUR OPINION
Paper’s content
misses the mark
The editorial content of
The Gamecock has become
insulting. This paper has
turned into something that
ranks with primary education
newsletters and Redbook.
While The Washington
Post, USA Today and even The
State run their lead story on
the impending war the United
States might lead the world
in, The Gamecock is running
articles on gay life at USC and
Preston looking for a new
president after a four-year
term. Which of these is so
profound that it warrants a
more prestigious position
than the aforementioned
topic?
Many USC students cannot
afford a subscription to The
State, and some rely on The
Gamecock as their only form
of printed news source. I
know I’ll walk by the
newsstands and make it a
point to read the top headlines
of real papers. Then I’ll go to
pick up a Gamecock in hopes
of some tidbit of international
news, only to find on the front
page some nonsense that
belongs in the entertainment
section. It’s enough to make
me skip lunch and save my
money for a subscription to a
newspaper.
There was probably a point,
maybe middle school, when
students were more interested
in their trite little worlds than
the one around them.
However, those days are long
over. I’m sure people would
have felt a tug on their
heartstrings for USC’s gay
community, had the article
not encompassed most of page
1 and two jumps worth of
valuable news pages.
I understand that running
USC stories and running
stories written by students
are important. However, part
of that importance is
localizing national stories.
Your goal should be to draw
interest in stories by making
those students who aren’t
interested involved through
their ability to relate. That
would impress readers much
more than the paper’s ability
to copy The State’s design.
And articles would retain that
“paperzine” quality it has
recently taken on.
I hope your editorial staff
does not believe we, the USC
population, are so self-centered
that we cannot escape our slight
campus. I hope your only
concern isn’t making the paper
“look pretty” under deadline
pressure. And I certainly hope
you remember the goal of a
newspaper is still to report
news.
MIRANDA LALONDE
FOURTH-YEAR STUDENT, COLLEGE OF
JOURNALISM AND MASS
COMMUNICATIONS: FORMER EDITOR
IN CHIEF, THE GAMECOCK
Submission Policy
Letters to the editor or guest columns
are welcome from the Carolina
community. Letters should be 250-300
words. Guest columns should be about
600 words. Both must include name,
phone number, professional title or year
and major, if a student. Deliver
handwritten submissions to Russell
House room 333, or send e-mail to
gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
The Gamecock reserves the right to
edit for libel, style and space.
Anonymous letters will not be
published. Photos are required for
guest columnists and can be provided
by the submitter. Call 777-7726 for
more information.
I_I
Just who
are we
fighting?
NATHAN WHITE
NATHANAWHITE@HOTMAIL.COM
Misled Muslims who
think killing Americans
is the key to heaven.
We are at war, this much we
know. The greater and more
looming question is who are we
(America) at war with? The
obvious and most likely answer
is “suspected terrorist” Osama
bin Laden. Perhaps the answer
could be broadened to bin
Laden’s al Qaeda network.
However, these answers are so
narrow in scope that the big
picture and the real enemy is
overlooked.
These are scary times. For the
past ten years, while most
Americans lived and reclined in
the hammock of America’s free
and seemingly secure borders,
old cold warriors at the
Pentagon and throughout the
military were searching for a
new enemy. Meanwhile,
American tanks guarded (and
still guard) Germany’s plains
from a nonexistent enemy
(Poland?), and thousands of
American soldiers protect South
Korea from the desolate
wasteland that is North Korea.
Now, the enemy has been
identified, and the cold warriors
still in charge are considering
conventional and even
unconventional military forces
to combat militant fighters in
Afghanistan. This is just as
scary as the fact that terrorists
have invaded our country.
These are scary times.
My fears come from the fact
that I believe our leaders and
our nation as a whole have failed
to realize what exactly we are at
war against. To me, it is simple.
We are not at war with wealthy
Islamic radicals or their
henchmen. The United States
and all of Western Christendom
is at war with the hundreds of
thousands—if not millions — of
destitute and disenfranchised
youth around the Arab and
greater Muslim world who are
lower than the dirt that the
social ladder is grounded upon
and who have no chance of
upward social mobility, nor any
political/economic opportunity
in this world.
These children have nothing
to look forward to other than the
Paradise that awaits the faithful
in the afterlife. And how to get
there? Live a full and long life by
the rules of the Quran? Hardly,
considering these youths’
existence can hardly be
confused for living. The answer
is not found in the Quran or any
of the morally upright and
worthy precepts of the Islamic
faith. Their misguided answer
comes from fanatical clerics and
believers: “If you want to get to
Heaven, little one, you must die
in the name of Allah as a holy
warrior fighting against the
infidels.” Translated, fly a
Boeing 757 into the World Trade
Center.
This is not a new war. This is
a new age. What will the United
States do? Will it realize that
this is not a war against an
actual few, but against the
potentially limitless numbers of
young, devout Muslims with
nothing left to lose other than
their sacred honor willing to die
for a cause that they so
admirably believe in?
And what scares me more
than anything is that I don’t
believe anybody truly knows
what is going to happen. Are my
children going to be Americans?
Will there be an America left?
Will my children even be bom?
Will their father die childless in
a foreign desert fighting the
most indefatigable of enemies:
an idea?