The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 04, 2001, Page 3, Image 3
The ©amecock
Other state colleges join USC in budget fight
■ MUSC, Winthrop
among other institutions
* presenting budget plans
by Charles Prashaw
The Gamecock
USC wasn’t the only school to give a budget
presentation to the Senate Finance Subcommittee
on Monday.
USC and its eight regional campuses, MUSC,
Winthrop, Francis Marion University, Coastal Carolina
University and Lander University gave budget
presentations.
The first half of the colleges and universities,
including Clemson and the College of Charleston,
gave their presentation, March 26.
The Senate Finance Subcommittee sent letters
to the 33 publicly funded state colleges and universities
asking them for their input on possible cuts in state
allocations to higher education.
The subcommittee will recommend the size of
the cuts for each school to a full finance committee.
From there, the finance committee will draft provisos
in the state budget, cutting the schools’ funding by
those amounts.
Schools were asked about how they could spend
less money, how a cut in state allocations would
affect them, the importance of their particular
institution and whether there was any outside revenue
the institution could find to handle the cuts.
FMU President Luther Carter said a cut in Iris
state allocations above 5 percent “would be
unthinkable.”
FMU was pondering an 18 percent tuition
increase next year, Carter said.
If state allocations are cut at FMU next year,
Carter said, the school would have to eliminate
adjunct positions and temporary employees, and each
program at the university would see an 11 percent
cut.
Carter asked the subcommittee not to cut the
university’s budget by a sizable amount because the
school teaches mostly South Carolinians who wouldn’t
be able to go to college anywhere else.
“Nearly 91 percent of our students are from right
here in South Carolina. We serve the common
people,” Carter said. “FMU is not a last resort for
higher education, but unfortunately, (it’s) sometimes
an only resort for higher education in our sector.”
Lander University President Daniel Ball said he
was told the school was facing a cut of about $2
million dollars from its $12 million state allocation.
Ball said a cut that high would cause the university
to lose 20 to 30 professors.
The school already has a hiring freeze, and classes
this fall at Lander are expected to be larger
because fewer sections will be offered.
Ball asked the subcommittee to consider doing
away with the Higher Education Price Cap that
doesn’t allow him to'raise tuition at Lander because
it’s already above the state’s average.
Following Ball, Coastal Carolina University
President Ron Engle said a budget cut would stop
the momentum his school had been working so hard
on.
Engle said he was looking for ways to pay for
new positions, including a marine science chair and
a business dean.
State officials have proposed a $ 1.59 million cut
in allocations to Coastal, but Engle said such a
large cut would greatly harm the university’s budget.
The city desk can be reached at
gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
* Budget
from page 1
Journalism and Mass Communications. Though not
mentioning him by name, Palms discussed candidate
William Norton of Nebraska, who cited budget
troubles as one reason he was reluctant to accept the
position.
“A budget cut would further threaten our financial
and academic stability, interrupt our current
momentum and immediately impair our ability to
serve the state and our students,” Palms said.
Palms said the state’s financial position could be
negatively affected by the cuts to USC.
“While we certainly understand the economic
downturn and the fiscal situation for the state of
South Carolina, we also know that our ability to help
the state weather and prevent such economic slumps
depends upon the state’s support of our joint
^ endeavor,” he said.
After the presentation, Palms answered questions
about the university’s budget. That led to a tense
exchange between Palms and Sen. Arthur
Ravenel, R-Charleston.
Ravenel, proposing that “maybe Chicken Little
was hatched over there at the university,” asked
Palms why the university had more administrative
employees per student than other state institutions.
Palms said the number Ravenel had, which
was supplied by the Commission on Higher Education,
was the number of non-faculty employees. He said
that was different from the number of administrative
staff. USC actually had a lower number of
administrative staff members per student, Palms said.
Ravenel continued to ask why the number of
non-faculty employees was higher.
“Why is there such a great disparity there?”
Ravenel asked.
1 Palms offered to supply the committee with the
figures USC had.
“Our numbers are different than those,” Palms
said. “I want to be sure we’re compared right.”
Ravenel also asked Palms how the Legislature
could shield the university from the cuts.
“You know the financial situation of the
state,” Ravenel said “How do you expect the General
Assembly, the Senate in particular, to protect you
from any significant, any reasonable cuts,” though
other services that brought in federal money were
cut.
Palms said he understood that senators had to
weigh the values of different programs.
“I’m not sitting in your chair,” Palms responded
“We’ll cooperate after you make those decisions.”
After the meeting, Palms said the Senate would
“start from scratch” with its own budget plan.
“In the past, the Senate has been very supportive
of higher education,” Palms said.
But he also recognized the reality of the shrinking
revenue that is the cause of an estimated $500 million
shortfall in next year’s budget.
“There’s less flexibility this year,” he said.
After the meeting, committee members said
their positions hadn’t changed much.
Sen. Robert Hayes, R-Rock Hill, said his support
of higher education was backed up by the presentations
of Palms and other college and university presidents.
Hayes said he was committed to finding more
funds for higher education. But, like Palms, Hayes
remained realistic.
“Wfe may not be able to find the money,” he said.
Ravenel said Palms’ presentation was about what
he had expected.
“I was disappointed,” Ravenel said.
He also said USC had a lot of what he labeled
“fat” in its budget.
“A great deal of it is in administration,” Ravenel
said. He said the state couldn’t afford to cut programs,
such as the Department of Health and Human
Services, which bring in federal funds and “are just
absolutely vital and critical to the life of a great many
South Carolinians.”
According to Ravenel, all state agencies would
have to share in the cuts. “Everyone has to realize
that good times do not last forever,” Ravenel said.
“When the lean times come, you have to accept your
responsibility to help fund the state services.”
The university desk can be reached at
gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
Burroughs
from page 1
present. She asked whether the soil quality
had been considered by Burroughs &
Chapin in its planning and about the levee’s
viability if it was built using the marshy
soil.
“How can you counteract the fact that
the existing soil is already at poor-to
moderate level?” Brady said.
Wiseman said several other projects,
such as the construction of 1-77, have been
made from the same dirt as in the
questioned area. He said Burroughs &
Chapin has taken more than 150 soil
samples and is confident in the soil quality.
“It is a concern; I think we’ve
addressed that concern,” Wiseman said.
“We felt comfortable enough to go
forward.”
According to Wiseman, 98 percent of
levees are constructed from soil rather
than concrete, so the soil would be a useful
and safe building material.
Council member Buddy Meetze
defended the levees, saying they’ve been
FEMA certified and that no certified levee
has ever breached over the amount of time
they are designed to last for. The Green
Diamond levees would last 500 years, and
Meetze asserted they would be constructed
in a safe manner.
“You don’t go out there with a
bulldozer and just mound up dirt,” Meetze
said.
Columbia Mayor Bob Coble asked
Wiseman about possible flooding,
environmental consequences and who
would be liable for damages. He asked
Wiseman to present an economic
impact study in three weeks.
The city desk can be reached at
gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Gamecock Editor
in Chief,
Summer 2001
Gamecock Editor
in Chief,
Fall 2001
The Editor in Chief is ultimately
responsible for every aspect of the
^ newspaper including editorial
content, recruitment and
supervision of editorial staff.
Garnet & Black
Editor in Chief,
2001-2002
The Editor in Chief is ultimately
responsible for every
aspect of the magazine,
including editorial content,
and recruitment and
supervision of G&B staff.
The magazine will be published
twice each semester in 2001-2002.
1 WUSC-FM
Station Manager,
2001-2002
The Station Manager is ultimately
responsible for every
aspect of the station,
including broadcast content,
publications and fundraising,
recruitment and supervision
of WUSC-FM staff.
Applications and job descriptions
may be picked up in the
Office of the Director of Student Life,
Russell House Suite 115.
►
The moon,
t's always inspired
Introducing new
MCE-A-MONTH LUNELLE™
Birth control in sync with
THE MOON AND YOU.
The moon is a source of beauty and emotion. For centuries, our
monthly cycle has mirrored the moon’s. Now, for the first time,
there’s birth control that’s monthly, not daily: new Lunelle.
An injectable that’s 99% effective without the daily hassle.
Lunelle is a combo of hormones that works continuously—all
month long. Given on time each month by your doctor,
prescription Lunelle gives you .birth control that’s 99% effective.
That means you get monthly pregnancy protection without the
daily hassle—without the daily worry—of taking the Pill. And if
you want to get pregnant? Most women get back to ovulating
about two to three months after receiving their last injection.
Lunelle doesn't protect against' HIV/AIDS or other sexually
transmitted diseases.
Hormonal birth control isn’t for everyone.
Pregnant women or women with blood clots, chest pain, certain
cancers,-unexplained vaginal bleeding, or a history of liver
disease, stroke, or heart attacks shouldn't take Lunelle. Serious
risks that can be life threatening include blood clots, stroke, and
■heart attack. And hev, no smoking! It increases these risks.
especially if you’re over 35 and smoke 15 or more cigarettes a day.
During the first few months of taking Lunelle, most women have
a change in their periods, which may include no bleeding,
irregular bleeding, or spotting. This change may continue with
use in up to one third of women. In studies, while some women
lost weight on Lunelle, the average change was an increase of
4 pounds in the first year. But you should know, some women
gained 10 or more pounds in the first year.
So ask your healthcare professional about new Lunelle.
Why worry about taking a daily Pill when there’s monthly Lunelle?
Birth control inspired by the moon.
Lunelle. In sync with the moon and you.
For more info: www.lunelle.com or 1 877 282-9273
I monthly contraceptive injection
medroxyprogesterone acetate &
estradiol cypionate injectable suspension
See the next page for important product information.
©2001 Pharmacia & Upjohn, a division of Pharmacia UX0009805 3/01