The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 30, 2001, Page 5, Image 5
Quote, Unquote
“I believe that the timing is a little unfortunate, coming as it does
in the middle of the budget crisis."
William Hubbard, USO trustee, on John Palms’ consideration of a Senate run
%\it (gamecock
Serving the Carolina Community since 1Q08
I Brock Vergakis
Editor in Chief
Brandon Larrabee
University Editor
Erin O’Neal
Spotlight Editor
Kyle Almond
Sports Editor
Brad Walters
Design Editor
Cristy Infinger
Asst. University Editor
”T
Valerie Matchette
City & State Editor
Amanda Silva
Spotlight Editor
Martha Wright
Copy Desk Chief
Charles Prashaw
Asst. City & State Editor
Aubrey Fitzloff
Asst. Viewpoints Editor
Palms must act quickly
if he’s to run for Senate
USC President John Palms caught everyone off guard
Wednesday by acknowledging that he was strongly con
sidering running for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by
Strom Thurmond, which would likely lead to his resignation as
USC president. Palms would be wrong in abandoning the univer
sity at the crossroads it is facing now — particularly in light of
the current budget crisis. But if he does want to run, he must de
cide to do so quickly.
No matter Palms’ decision, damage has already been done. As
trustee Michael Mungo pointed out, Palms is now and forever a
Democrat in the eyes of the politicians in the General Assembly,
for Palms to publicly consider a run, and for USC administrators
r vTj reveal that he was doing so, was extremely unwise. Unless
Palms is definitely going to run — and we suspect he is — he and
other USC officials should have kept the matter to themselves.
But now the news is out, and a public decision from Palms
must be made swiftly. The longer Palms remains undecided, the
harder it will be for USC to find a suitable replacement for the
school’s top post.
Palms has presided over a great improvement in USC’s image
and credibility, a monumental task after the financial and person
al disasters former president James Holderman visited upon the
university. If USC is to find a replacement strong enough to take
the school to the next level — a solid research university with
AAU credentials — it will need to begin the search as soon as
possible.
Ideally, it would be in the university’s best interests for Palms
to stay and finish the work he has started. We don’t doubt Palms
could serve ably and represent South Carolina well as its junior
lOnator, and we don’t doubt that he would be a vigorous defender
of higher education, something that is badly needed in Washing
ton. But Palms still has much to do here at USC. He can do far
more good for this institution, and higher education statewide, as
a spokesman for South Carolina’s colleges and universities in
stead of one of 100 senators serving the entire nation.
Several members of the board of trustees were shocked, and
slightly dismayed, that Palms would so publicly reveal his politi
cal affiliation, especially because he will now be a possible De
mocratic candidate asking a Republican-controlled legislature to
give USC more money. These, too, are valid concerns. After all,
how could the GOP-dominated Legislature look favorably upon
the institution headed by a potential opponent of Lindsey Gra
ham?
We expected more of Palms. To leave now, having brought the
university to the cusp of the goals to which he has aspired for so
. lg, is a disservice to the faculty, staff and students of the uni
versity. But, first and foremost, it is a disservice to the legacy of
John Palms.
A B O U T U s
The Gamecock is the student newspaper of the University of South Carolina and is published Monday, Wednesday and Friday
during the fall and spring semesters and nine times during the summer with the exception of university holidays and exam
periods. Opinions expressed in The Gamecock are those of the editors or author and not those of the University of South
Carolina. The Board of Student Publications and Communications is the publisher of The Gamecock. The Department of
Student Media is the newspaper’s parent organization. The Gamecock is supported in part by student activities fees.
Address
The Gamecock
1400 Greene Street
Columbia, SC 29208
Offices on third floor of the Russell House.
Student Media Area code 803
Arfrertising 777-3888
fied 777-1184
777-6482
Office 777-3888
Gamecock Area code 803-777-7726
Editor in Chief gamecockeditor@hotmail.com
University Desk gamecockudesk@hotmail.com
City/State Desk gamecockcitydesk@hotmail.com
Viewpoints gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com
Spotlight gamecockspotlight@hotmail.com
Sports gamecocksports@hotmail.com
Online www.dailygamecock.com
SuBMttstON Policy
Letters to the editor or guest columns are
welcome from all members of the Carolina
community. Letters should be 250-300 words. Guest
columns should be an opinion piece of about 600
words.
Both must include name, phone number,
professional title or year and major, if a student.
Handwritten submissions must be personally
delivered to Russell House room 333. E-mail
submissions must include telephone number
for confirmation and should be e-mailed to
gamecockviewpoints@hotmail.com.
The Gamecock reserves the right to edit for libel,
style and space. Anonymous letters will not be
published. Photos are required for guest columnists
aryY-an be provided by the submitter.
I
The Gumehxecx
Ann Marie Miani Travis Lynn
Jennie Moore Sean Rayford
w Photo Editors
Mark Yates
Page Designers Crystal Boyles
Betsy Baugh Mackenzie Clements
Sara McLaulin Jason Harmon
Community Affairs Copy Editors
stummi-mcma
Erik Collins Carolyn Griffin
Faculty Adviser Business Manager
Ellen Parsons Sarah Sims
Director of Advertising Manager
Student Media
Susan King Jannell Deyo
Creative Director Robyn Gombar
Kera Khalil
?,* *"una Denise Levereaux
Todd Hooks Nicole Russell
Melame Hutto Advertising Staff
Emilie Moca
Martin Salisbury Sherry F. Holmes
Creative Sen/ices Classified Manager
Only two letters to the editor per siudent will be
printed in a semester. Staff columns take priority over
guest columns, unless the guest columnist offers
expertise on a subject, or if the subject's relevance is
limited by time.
Guest columns and letters may be submitted by
e-mail to gamecockviewpointsOhotmail.com.
Call 777-7726 for more information.
The Gamecock v
...r.,... .. ............................ _s s ■' . iJ *>
'jaceTHe |
TDxtSwJHjcKeJ
XHflve Tt> I
QtveTIASdA ^
OusrToftf^^
He? r/!/W!
KnctjoyouCpJtVuvm
[Geto^
I SUCKS)
IFRomNs&H'
iviuJfjfoiJ date*
’OfeiwnA
V ^qSsi.I .
" luilioiO T/tVfllEAif 'PlMS " I
Pop Culture
Hollywood shows us the way again
Traditionally, —" ——
the Oscars '
are an an- »
nual event at acwt
which people gaze
in awe as witty *
commercials and **“"**■
spoiled actresses Phil Watson
in $5,000 dresses is a third-year
are paraded across student i n the
the television Collegeof
screen. Journalism and
If you were Mass
lucky enough to Communications,
see the awards, send responses to
you saw various gamecockviewpoints
self-serving, over- @hotmai|.com.
zealous accep
tance speeches scattered between 10
minute Pepsi commercials featuring Bob
Dole and Britney Spears.
I did like the long, drawn-out
commercial breaks. They were more
entertaining than the actual awards. I’d
rather watch that lovable auto-insurance
gecko than I would the self-loving sell
outs who gathered in Hollywood to
inflate their already blimp-sized egos.
Let’s start with the Britney Shears
commercial I mentioned earlier. AtTeast
Britney and her breasts understand they
are simply marketing tools. They know
there’s nothing genuine or original about
them, and they accept that.
Unlike Spears and her silicon friends,
the vain celebrities in the awards show
actually think they’re special and that
their opinions matter. This kills me. Does
Julia Roberts really think the mindless
drivel that comes out of her mouth should
matter to anyone other than herself and
her elitist Hollywood friends?
In an interview before the awards,
Roberts found it necessary to give us
some in-depth political analysis.
Evidently, she doesn’t like Geotge-W.
Bush. She seems to think he’s stupid.
Why hasn’t she been on Hardball and
The O’Reilly Factoid Roberts is such a
talented woman. Not only is she a
good actress, but she knows why we
shouldn’t like conservative politicians.
Roberts might as well have given her
dissertation on the Bush Administration.
She seemed to do everything but that.
I don’t know exactly how long her
speech lasted, but it was much longer
than the 45-second limit the show set.
As it turns out, Roberts was protesting
that time limit by mumbling incoherently
for as long as she could. You go, Julia!
What an activist — one minute she’s
protesting the economic policies of
the president, and the next she’s going
after the fascist 45-second rule for
acceptance speeches.
It would have thrilled me to see some
hideous space aliens come down and
abduct everyone in that auditorium. I
think some rectal probing would make
Julia Roberts realize George W. Bush
and the Academy’s 45-second rule aren’t
so bad. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen.
Maybe next year.
Letters
Abortion exposure
was unnecessary
To the Editor.
How many women on campus have
had an abortion? Did all USC students have
to be exposed to such pictures as the ones
shown in last week’s display on the way
to class?
Why didn’t USC approve a display of
huge pictures of black lungs or mouth
cancer? I can’t tell you how many people
on the campus smoke. You almost walk
to class in a trail of smoke. I wonder how
many students might consider quitting if
they knew the harm it does to their
body.
The abortion display wasn’t needed.
I wasn’t able to eat for two days after seeing
the pictures, but maybe USC is
experimenting with eating disorders, too.
Julie Pike
Second-year Student
College of Journalism and Mass
Communications
Abortion should be
banned, not display
To the Editor
It wasn’t surprising that students were
offended by the genocide awareness display.
I understand their strong reactions, because
those pictures shocked and grieved me,
too. Abortion is a disturbing subject that
most would prefer to avoid. If we can’t
bear to look at images of aborted babies,
how can we allow abortion in our nation?
The reality and effects of abortion arc far
worse than those awful pictures could
depict. In attacking the display, we are
missing the point. One letter to the editor
stated, “The display is outrageous, uncalled
for and should be banned.” My response?
Abortion is outrageous, uncalled-for and
should be banned.
I
Mary Cook
Fourth-year Student
College of Engineering
Marriott should allow
Patio employee to sit
To the Editor
During a recent visit to The Patio
cafeteria, we noticed something different.
Our good friend Merrill, the man in chaige
of checking and swiping student IDs, wasn’t
in his usual position. The powers that be
at The Patio have decided Merrill shouldn’t
be allowed to sit while he works.
Instead, Merrill has been forced to
stand and work behind a raised table, which
is specifically designed to prevent him
from sitting at any time. Merrill’s job
doesn’t require him to stand for hours at
a time. This act is pointless and callous.
We feel that this is an important issue
and that the comfort and support of USC
employees should be a paramount principle
of the university. If most sweatshop
employers allow their employees to sit
while they work, why should USC Dining
Services be any different?
Andrew Griffen, Andrew Frasseto
First-year Students
College of Liberal Aits, College of Math
and Science
4
Students should think
rather than get upset
To the Editor
The purpose of last week’s abortion
display was not to upset, offend or disgust
people.
Abortion is a touchy issue; no one
really likes to talk about it, but everyone
has their stance. When dealing with a
complex issue, it’s always best to hear
everyone’s side to form your opinion. That
was the purpose of the display — to show
one group’s take on abortion.
A lot of people have complained that
the photos are just disgusting. The mission
of the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform is to
show what abortion does. There isn’t a
pretty way to show it; an aborted baby isn’t
cute. It is important to consider this. Staying
disgusted and doing nothing gets you
nowhere. A few people talked with the
people manning the display, but more
people made no attempt. I don’t think
anyone would disqgree that talking wouldn’t
hurt.
Finally, freedom of speech is anyone’s.
If you want to present other views, go for
it. Invite a group, invite a speaker, host an
event. To quote The Gamecock: “The
answer to speech you disagree with is...
to respond with speech of your own.”
ErinFlickinger
Third-year student
College of Science and Math
[Ed. Note: Erin Flickingcr is president of
Students for Life, a group that sponsored
the display]
Proper Etiquette
It’s time
to regain
common
courtesy
It’s very easy
to feel like a
small fish at
USC. One is
constantly
surrounded by
thousands of ... . „ —.
Michelle Pittman
students who are is a SKOnd.ye„
pretty much the studentinthe
same age, many of college of
whom seem to be Journalism and
achieving great Mass
things, reducing Communications,
our accomplish- Send responses to
ments to mere gamecockviewpoints
shrivels of self- ehotmail.com.
satisfaction. My
already small perception of myself is
further dwarfed by the attitude of
many of the people I encounter on a daily
basis. The congregation of so many little
souls in such a short stretch of time is
bound to cause problems, but the few
laige egos that have escaped scrutiny are
taking over.
l round mysett throwing barbecue
sauce at a stranger the other day. It already
takes 20 minutes to get a decent lunch
on campus, once you factor in the “speed”
of Maniott employees and the long lines
that defy concepts of personal space. But
when it’s chicken finger day and you’re
really hungry, you learn to have a little
patience.
Unless you’re the bitch who was
behind me in the condiment line at
Capstone on Tuesday. Everyone else
waited, but Miss Better-Than-Thou
obviously had more important things to
do. There’s no excuse for pushing or
shoving past the age of 12, and cutting
in line is about the lamest thing you can
do. So when her giant rear end was
pushing in front of me, I called her on it,
and if she hadn’t managed to get honey
mustard all over my new sweater, I would
have let it go. But how precious are clean
clothes? Someone needs to stand up to
these jerks.
I can’t do it alone. I’m not the only
one who has had those episodes of
invisibility when one can’t help but
wonder if this entire campus needs glasses.
Or maybe we’ve all just forgotten basic
human dignity in our rush to get ahead.
Wfe’ve forgotten the little things, such
as not slamming doors shut behind
ourselves, just in case someone else might
be walking in. And, excuse me; but
elevators were invented for those who
live in skyscrapers and the handicapped
who find it rather difficult to climb stairs
on wheels.
I’d especially like to remind
people of the elevator principles because
I’m tired of stepping into my steel fortress
to find all the buttons pushed or someone
hugging the door while their friend moseys
down the hall. The elevator is for the
\
general use of everyone, not to promote
the laziness of people who find it too
difficult to travel to the second floor from
the third.
I realize this is extremely petty, but
I am a firm believer in details. Life’s a
bitch, and things will go horribly wrong.
You can count on it. So in the meantime,
why not take three seconds out of your
day to look out for someone else? They
might not appreciate it as much as I do,
but catch the wrong person in the wrong
mood, and there’ll be hell to pay.
Wve got enough to worry about. It
would be nice to know that someone’s
holding the door, or a bike is swerving
to avoid passers-by, and all of you blessed
drivers are not flying past the crosswalks
as innocent pedestrians huddle under
their umbrellas. If we all start off small,
perhaps one day we can live in a world
where people are on time and phone
messages are always relayed. Life sucks
enough. Try not to contribute.